Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Modifications to Renewable Fuel Standard Program Requirements, 29948-29952 [E9-14849]

Download as PDF 29948 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 24, 2009 / Rules and Regulations Under the provisions of 33 CFR 165.1191, unauthorized persons or vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring in the safety zone during all applicable effective dates and times, unless authorized to do so by the PATCOM. Additionally, each person who receives notice of a lawful order or direction issued by an official patrol vessel shall obey the order of direction. The PATCOM is empowered to forbid entry into and control the regulated area. The PATCOM shall be designated by the Commander, Coast Guard Sector San Francisco. The PATCOM may, upon request, allow the transit of commercial vessels through regulated areas when it is safe to do so. This notice is issued under authority of 33 CFR 165.1191 and 5 U.S.C. 552 (a). In addition to this notice in the Federal Register, the Coast Guard will provide the maritime community with extensive advance notification of this enforcement period via the Local Notice to Mariners. If the Captain of the Port determines that the regulated area need not be enforced for the full duration stated in this notice, he or she may use a Broadcast Notice to Mariners to grant general permission to enter the regulated area. Dated: June 8, 2009. P.M. Gugg, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port San Francisco . [FR Doc. E9–14770 Filed 6–23–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–15–P * * * * [FR Doc. E9–14992 Filed 6–23–09; 8:45 am] VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:46 Jun 23, 2009 Standards of Performance for New Stationary Sources CFR Correction In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Part 60 (§ 60.1 to end of part 60 sections), revised as of July 1, 2008, on page 637, in § 60.664, the equation in paragraph (f)(1) introductory text is corrected to read as follows: § 60.664 * Test methods and procedures. * * (f) * * * (1) * * * * * 1 ⎡ 0.88 0.88 0.5 0.88 a + b ( Qs ) + c ( Qs ) + d ( Qs ) ( H T ) + e ( Qs ) ( H T ) + f ( Ys ) ⎤ ⎣ ⎦ E TOC make the appropriate corrections, clarifications and modifications. However, EPA received adverse BILLING CODE 1505–01–D comment on several provisions in the parallel proposed and direct final rules and, on November 26, 2008, withdrew ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION those provisions from the direct final AGENCY rule that drew adverse comment. In 40 CFR Part 80 today’s action, EPA is addressing the comments received on the portions of [EPA EPA–HQ–OAR–2005–0161; FRL–8922– the direct final rule that were 6] withdrawn and is finalizing those RIN 2060–AO80 withdrawn provisions with minor clarifying changes. Regulation of Fuels and Fuel DATES: This final rule is effective on Additives: Modifications to Renewable August 24, 2009. Fuel Standard Program Requirements ADDRESSES: EPA has established a AGENCY: Environmental Protection docket for this action under Docket ID Agency (EPA). No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2005–0161. All documents in the docket are listed on ACTION: Final rule. the https://www.regulations.gov Web SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing amendments site. Although listed in the index, some to the Renewable Fuel Standard information is not publicly available, program requirements. Following e.g., CBI or other information whose publication of the May 1, 2007, final disclosure is restricted by statute. rule promulgating the Renewable Fuel Certain other material, such as Standard regulations, EPA discovered a copyrighted material, is not placed on number of technical errors and areas the Internet and will be publicly within the regulations that could benefit available only in hard copy form. from clarification or modification. In Publicly available docket materials are parallel proposed and direct final rules available either electronically through published on October 8, 2008, EPA https://www.regulations.gov or in hard proposed to amend the regulations to copy at the Air and Radiation Docket, ID * 40 CFR Part 60 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2005–0161, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket is (202) 566–9744. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Meg McCarthy, Compliance and Innovative Strategies Division, Office of Transportation and Air Quality (6406J), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., 20460; telephone number: (202) 343–9968; fax number: (202) 343–2802; e-mail address: mccarthy.meg@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does This Action Apply to Me? Entities potentially affected by this action include those involved with the production, importation, distribution and sale of gasoline motor fuel or renewable fuels such as ethanol and biodiesel. Regulated categories and entities affected by this action include: E:\FR\FM\24JNR1.SGM 24JNR1 EC16NO91.104 TRE = ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 24, 2009 / Rules and Regulations NAICS codes a Category Industry Industry Industry Industry Industry Industry Examples of potentially regulated parties SIC codes b ......................................................................... ......................................................................... ......................................................................... ......................................................................... ......................................................................... ......................................................................... 324110 325193 325199 424690 424710 424720 2911 2869 2869 5169 5171 5172 Industry ......................................................................... 454319 5989 29949 Petroleum refiners, importers. Ethyl alcohol manufacturers. Other basic organic chemical manufacturers. Chemical and allied products merchant wholesalers. Petroleum bulk stations and terminals. Petroleum and petroleum products merchant wholesalers. Other fuel dealers. a North American Industry Classification System (NAICS). b Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system code. This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this action. This table lists the types of entities that EPA is now aware could be potentially regulated by this action. Other types of entities not listed in the table could also be regulated. To determine whether your entity is regulated by this action, you should carefully examine the applicability criteria of part 80, subpart K of title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations. If you have any question regarding applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person in the preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above. II. Renewable Fuel Standard Program Amendments EPA issued final regulations implementing the Renewable Fuel Standard Program on May 1, 2007. EPA subsequently identified a number of technical errors and ambiguities in the regulations and, in parallel proposed and direct final rules published on October 2, 2008, proposed to amend the regulations to correct these deficiencies. EPA received adverse comment on certain of the proposed changes, so, on November 26, 2008, formally withdrew the portions of the direct final rule that were the subject of adverse comment. Those provisions consisted of amendments to 40 CFR 80.1129(b)(1) and 80.1129(b)(8) (providing that a party with a small refinery or small refiner exemption may only separate RINs that have been assigned to a volume of renewable fuel that the party blends into motor vehicle fuel), 40 CFR 80.1129(b)(4) (providing that any party may separate the RINs from renewable fuel that it produces or markets for use in motor vehicles, or uses in motor vehicles without further blending), and 40 CFR 80.1131(a)(8) and 80.1131(b)(4) (changing the location in the RFS regulations of a provision stating that a RIN that is transferred to two or more parties is considered an invalid RIN unless EPA in its sole discretion VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:46 Jun 23, 2009 Jkt 217001 determines that some portion of these RINs is valid). EPA published a parallel proposed rule (73 FR 57274) on the same day as the direct final rule. The proposed rule invited comment on the substance of the direct final rule and indicated that a second comment period would not be offered on the proposal in the event that portions of the direct final rule were withdrawn in response to adverse comment. In this action, we are responding to the comments received on the portions of the direct final rule that were withdrawn, and we are finalizing the proposed technical corrections with minor clarifying changes. A. Separating RINs: Parties With Small Refiner or Small Refinery Exemption EPA proposed the addition of 40 CFR 80.1129(b)(8) and a conforming change to 80.1129(b)(1) to clarify that a party with a small refinery or small refiner exemption may only separate Renewable Identification Numbers (RINs) that have been assigned to a volume of renewable fuel that the party blends into motor vehicle fuel. In response to this proposed amendment, EPA received a comment which stated that the proposed 80.1129(b)(8) would result in the provision being overly broad. The comment further articulated a concern that EPA has mistakenly concluded that all refiners who have received either a small refiner exemption under 40 CFR 80.1142 or a small refinery exemption under 40 CFR 80.1141 are not obligated parties under the RFS program, and therefore, that those refiners may only separate RINs that have been assigned to volumes of renewable fuel that the refiner blends into motor vehicle fuel. Refiners who have received the small refinery exemption either are not obligated parties because they do not operate other non-exempt refineries or they are obligated parties because they do operate other non-exempt refineries. The commenter argued that the proposed technical amendment to add 40 CFR 80.1129(b)(8), as written, applies to both groups, but that it should apply PO 00000 Frm 00017 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 only to the former group of refiners and not the latter. EPA agrees with the comment and has added a clause to the final amendment to 40 80.1129(b)(8) to clarify our intention. Thus, the final rule states that it applies only to parties that have received a small refinery or small refiner exemption and who are ‘‘not otherwise obligated parties.’’ B. Separating RINs for Renewable Fuel Designated for Use as Motor Vehicle Fuel and Used as Motor Vehicle Fuel EPA proposed changes to 40 CFR 80.1129(b)(4) in order to clarify that any party, not just renewable fuel producers or importers, may separate the RINs from renewable fuel when it designates that fuel for use in motor vehicles and the renewable fuel is used in motor vehicles in that designated form. EPA received a comment on 80.1129(b)(4) which stated that that regulation should clarify that EPA intends the provision to apply to motor vehicle fuel used in its neat form, deposited directly into a motor vehicle fuel supply tank as motor vehicle fuel. In response, EPA confirms that the provision was originally meant to apply to neat renewable fuel that is designated for use as motor vehicle fuel, and is used as motor vehicle fuel in its designated form. In other words, the provision applies to neat renewable fuel that is directly used as motor vehicle fuel and is not blended any further. For purposes of the RFS program, ‘‘neat renewable fuel’’ is defined in 80.1101(p) as ‘‘a renewable fuel to which only de minimis amounts of conventional gasoline or diesel have been added.’’ Under the RFS program, denatured ethanol is considered neat renewable fuel, as is denatured ethanol with only an additional de minimis quantity of gasoline added. In the case of biodiesel, a biodiesel producer would be authorized under 80.1129(b)(4) to separate RINs for B100 or B99 that it designates as motor vehicle fuel, providing that the fuel is in fact used that way. E:\FR\FM\24JNR1.SGM 24JNR1 29950 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 24, 2009 / Rules and Regulations In contrast, any party that blends ethanol with more than a de minimis additional amount of gasoline beyond what is used for denaturing, or blends biodiesel with 20 volume percent or more of conventional diesel must separate any RINs assigned to that volume of renewable fuel, as required under 80.1129(b)(2). Biodiesel blends in which conventional diesel constitutes less than 20 volume percent and more than one percent are ineligible for RIN separation under any circumstances, as specified in 80.1129(b)(2) and (b)(5). As noted in the preamble to the final RFS regulations, it is EPA’s understanding that in the vast majority of cases, biodiesel is blended with diesel in biodiesel concentrations of 80 volume percent or less. Therefore, EPA did not anticipate that this restriction would operate to significantly restrict biodiesel blending for fuel production, while it would afford some measure of protection against the possibility that renewable fuel producers could hold back RINs from obligated parties for the purpose of driving up their price. However, we may revisit this issue in a future RFS rulemaking since circumstances may change such that biodiesel blends of 81 percent or greater begin to be used more commonly as motor vehicle fuel. In the proposed technical amendments, EPA proposed to expand the parties eligible to separate RINS for neat renewable fuel to include any party that produces, imports, owns, sells or uses such fuel. EPA is finalizing the proposed change to 80.1129(b)(4) and, in response to comment, is clarifying that this section applies only to neat renewable fuel. In addition, EPA is making conforming amendments to 80.1151(b)(5) and 80.11129(b)5)(ii) to reflect the expanded applicability of 80.1129(b)(4). C. Duplicate RINs EPA proposed changes to 40 CFR 80.1131(a)(8) and 80.1131(b)(4), which consisted of changing the location in the RFS regulations of a provision stating that a RIN that is transferred to two or more parties is considered an invalid RIN unless EPA in its sole discretion determines that some portion of these RINs is valid. EPA received a comment which stated that EPA should not invalidate all duplicate RINs, but, rather, the party transferring duplicate RINs should be required to take appropriate actions such as notifying all parties who have received the duplicate RINs, determine which RINs are valid and which are invalid, and transfer replacement RINs VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:46 Jun 23, 2009 Jkt 217001 to those parties that received invalid RINs. In response, EPA believes that if duplicate RINs are not made automatically invalid, problems associated with the duplicate RINs may be compounded downstream from the original duplication. For example, additional downstream transfers of duplicate RINs could occur if transferees are confused about which RINs are valid and which are not. EPA believes this type of confusion is minimized by automatically invalidating all RINs for which duplicates have been identified, and giving EPA sole discretion to determine if any of the duplicate RINs are valid. Since EPA received no comment on its proposed relocation of this provision within the RFS program regulations, EPA is finalizing the technical amendments to 40 CFR 80.1131(a)(8) and 80.1131(b)(4) as proposed. III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review Under Executive Order 12866, (58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993)) the Agency must determine whether the regulatory action is ‘‘significant’’ and therefore subject to OMB review and the requirements of the Executive Order. The Order defines ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ as one that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive Order. It has been determined that this action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under the terms of Executive Order 12866 and is therefore not subject to OMB review. This final rule simply makes minor technical changes to the RFS regulations and modifies certain requirements to make them less burdensome for regulated parties. PO 00000 Frm 00018 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 B. Paperwork Reduction Act This action does not impose any new information collection burden. This action makes minor technical corrections to the regulations and modifies certain requirements to lessen the burden on related parties while maintaining the overall goals of the program. None of the changes in the rule require any additional information collection burdens. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has previously approved the information collection requirements contained in the existing regulations 40 CFR part 80, subpart K, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and has assigned OMB control number 2060–0600. The OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9. C. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses, small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions. For purposes of assessing the impacts of today’s rule on small entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business as defined by the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) regulations at 13 CFR 121.201; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of a city, county, town, school district or special district with a population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field. In determining whether a rule has a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities, the impact of concern is any significant adverse economic impact on small entities, since the primary purpose of the regulatory flexibility analyses is to identify and address regulatory alternatives ‘‘which minimize any significant economic impact of the rule on small entities.’’ 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. Thus, an agency may certify that a rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities if the rule relieves regulatory burden, or otherwise has a positive economic effect on all of the small entities subject to the rule. This action E:\FR\FM\24JNR1.SGM 24JNR1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 24, 2009 / Rules and Regulations F. Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments) makes minor technical corrections to the regulations and modifies certain requirements to lessen the burden on regulated parties. Thus, after considering the economic impacts of today’s final rule on small entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act This rule does not contain a Federal mandate that may result in expenditures of $100 million or more for State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector in any one year. This action makes minor technical corrections to the RFS regulations and modifies certain provisions to lessen the requirements for regulated parties. As a result, this rule will have the overall effect of reducing the burden of the RFS regulations on regulated parties. Thus, this rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 or 205 of UMRA. This rule is also not subject to the requirements of section 203 of UMRA because it contains no regulatory requirements that might significantly or uniquely affect small governments. It only applies to gasoline and renewable fuel producers, importers, distributors and marketers and makes minor corrections and modifications to the RFS regulations. E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism) Executive Order 13132, entitled ‘‘Federalism’’ (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure ‘‘meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the development of regulatory policies that have Federalism implications.’’ ‘‘Policies that have Federalism implications’’ is defined in the Executive Order to include regulations that have ‘‘substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.’’ This final rule does not have Federalism implications. It will not have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship between the national government and the States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132. This action makes minor technical corrections and certain modifications that lessen the burden on related parties. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this rule. VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:46 Jun 23, 2009 Jkt 217001 This final rule does not have tribal implications, as specified in Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). It applies to gasoline and renewable fuel producers, importers, distributors and marketers. This action makes minor corrections and modifications to the RFS regulations, and does not impose any enforceable duties on communities of Indian tribal governments. Thus, Executive Order 13175 does not apply to this action. G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks EPA interprets EO 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as applying only to those regulatory actions that concern health or safety risks, such that the analysis required under section 5–501 of the EO has the potential to influence the regulation. This action is not subject to EO 13045 because it does not establish an environmental standard intended to mitigate health or safety risks. H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 18355 (May 22, 2001)), because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (‘‘NTTAA’’), Public Law 104–113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to provide Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides not to use available and applicable voluntary consensus standards. This action does not involve technical standards. Therefore, EPA did not consider the use of any voluntary consensus standards. PO 00000 Frm 00019 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 29951 J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income populations in the United States. EPA has determined that this final rule will not have disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not affect the level of protection provided to human health or the environment. These technical amendments do not relax the control measures on sources regulated by the RFS regulations and therefore will not cause emissions increases from these sources. K. Congressional Review Act The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 80 Environmental protection, Fuel additives, Gasoline, Imports, Motor vehicle pollution, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements. Dated: June 18, 2009. Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator. ■ 40 CFR Part 80 is amended as follows: E:\FR\FM\24JNR1.SGM 24JNR1 29952 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 24, 2009 / Rules and Regulations PART 80–REGULATION OF FUEL AND FUEL ADDITIVES * 1. The authority citation for part 80 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7414, 7542, 7545, and 7601(a). 2. Section 80.1129 is amended as follows: ■ a. By revising paragraph (b)(1). ■ b. By revising paragraph (b)(4). ■ c. By revising paragraph (b)(5)(ii). ■ d. By adding paragraph (b)(8). ■ BILLING CODE 6560–50–P * * * * * (b) * * * (1) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(6) and (b)(8) of this section, a party that is an obligated party according to § 80.1106 must separate any RINs that have been assigned to a volume of renewable fuel if they own that volume. * * * * * (4) Any party that produces, imports, owns, sells or uses a volume of neat renewable fuel may separate any RINs that have been assigned to that volume of neat renewable fuel if the party designates the neat renewable fuel as motor vehicle fuel, and the neat renewable fuel is used as a motor vehicle fuel. (5) * * * (ii) This paragraph (b)(5) shall not apply to any party meeting the requirements of paragraph (b)(4) of this section. * * * * * (8) For a party that has received a small refinery exemption under § 80.1141 or a small refiner exemption under § 80.1142, and who is not otherwise an obligated party, during the period of time that the small refinery or small refiner exemption is in effect the party may only separate RINs that have been assigned to volumes of renewable fuel that the party blends into motor vehicle fuel in accordance with paragraph (b)(2) of this section. * * * * * 3. Section 80.1131 is amended by adding paragraph (a)(8) and removing paragraph (b)(4) to read as follows: Treatment of invalid RINs. (a) * * * (8) In the event that the same RIN is transferred to two or more parties, all such RINs will be deemed to be invalid, unless EPA in its sole discretion determines that some portion of these RINs is valid. * * * * * 4. Section 80.1151 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(5) to read as follows: VerDate Nov<24>2008 15:46 Jun 23, 2009 Jkt 217001 * * * * (b) * * * (5) Records related to the production, importation, ownership, sale or use of any volume of neat renewable fuel that any party designates as motor vehicle fuel and uses as motor vehicle fuel. * * * * * [FR Doc. E9–14849 Filed 6–23–09; 8:45 am] § 80.1129 Requirements for separating RINs from volumes of renewable fuel. § 80.1131 § 80.1151 What are the recordkeeping requirements under the RFS program? ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 82 [EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0503; FRL–8922–7] RIN–2060–AO77 Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Allocation of Essential Use Allowances for Calendar Year 2009 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Final rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: With this action, EPA is allocating essential use allowances for import and production of Class I ozonedepleting substances for calendar year 2009. Essential use allowances enable a person to obtain controlled Class I ozone depleting substances as part of an exemption to the regulatory ban on the production and import of these chemicals, which became effective January 1, 1996. EPA allocates essential use allowances for production and import of a specific quantity of Class I substances solely for the designated essential purpose. The allocation in this action is 63.0 metric tons of chlorofluorocarbons for use in metered dose inhalers for 2009. DATES: This final rule is effective June 24, 2009. ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2008–0503. All documents in the docket are listed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, e.g., confidential business information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air Docket, EPA/DC, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., PO 00000 Frm 00020 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 NW., Washington, DC 20460. This Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566–1744, and the telephone number for the Air Docket is (202) 566– 1742. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jennifer Bohman, by regular mail: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Stratospheric Protection Division (6205J), 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW., Washington, DC, 20460; by courier service or overnight express: 1301 L Street, NW., Room 1047A, Washington DC, 20005; by telephone: (202) 343– 9548; or by e-mail: bohman.jennifer@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Table of Contents I. Basis for Allocating Essential Use Allowances A. What are essential use allowances? B. Under what authority does EPA allocate essential use allowances? C. What is the process for allocating essential use allowances? II. Essential Use Allowances for Medical Devices III. Response to Comments IV. Allocation of Essential Use Allowances for Calendar Year 2009 V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review B. Paperwork Reduction Act C. Regulatory Flexibility Act D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations K. Congressional Review Act VI. Effective Date of This Final Rule I. Basis for Allocating Essential Use Allowances A. What are essential use allowances? Essential use allowances are allowances to produce or import certain ozone-depleting substances (ODSs) in the U.S. for purposes that have been deemed ‘‘essential’’ by the U.S. Government and by the Parties to the Montreal Protocol on Substances that E:\FR\FM\24JNR1.SGM 24JNR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 24, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29948-29952]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14849]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 80

[EPA EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161; FRL-8922-6]
RIN 2060-AO80


Regulation of Fuels and Fuel Additives: Modifications to 
Renewable Fuel Standard Program Requirements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is finalizing amendments to the Renewable Fuel Standard 
program requirements. Following publication of the May 1, 2007, final 
rule promulgating the Renewable Fuel Standard regulations, EPA 
discovered a number of technical errors and areas within the 
regulations that could benefit from clarification or modification. In 
parallel proposed and direct final rules published on October 8, 2008, 
EPA proposed to amend the regulations to make the appropriate 
corrections, clarifications and modifications. However, EPA received 
adverse comment on several provisions in the parallel proposed and 
direct final rules and, on November 26, 2008, withdrew those provisions 
from the direct final rule that drew adverse comment. In today's 
action, EPA is addressing the comments received on the portions of the 
direct final rule that were withdrawn and is finalizing those withdrawn 
provisions with minor clarifying changes.

DATES: This final rule is effective on August 24, 2009.

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID 
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161. All documents in the docket are listed on the 
https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some 
information is not publicly available, e.g., CBI or other information 
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such 
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be 
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket 
materials are available either electronically through https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Air and Radiation Docket, ID 
No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2005-0161, EPA West, Room 3334, 1301 Constitution Ave., 
NW., Washington, DC. The Public Reading Room is open from 8:30 a.m. to 
4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The 
telephone number for the Public Reading Room is (202) 566-1744, and the 
telephone number for the Air and Radiation Docket is (202) 566-9744.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Meg McCarthy, Compliance and 
Innovative Strategies Division, Office of Transportation and Air 
Quality (6406J), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania 
Avenue, NW., 20460; telephone number: (202) 343-9968; fax number: (202) 
343-2802; e-mail address: mccarthy.meg@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. General Information

A. Does This Action Apply to Me?

    Entities potentially affected by this action include those involved 
with the production, importation, distribution and sale of gasoline 
motor fuel or renewable fuels such as ethanol and biodiesel. Regulated 
categories and entities affected by this action include:

[[Page 29949]]



----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                  NAICS codes                        Examples of potentially
                   Category                           \a\        SIC codes \b\          regulated parties
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Industry......................................          324110            2911  Petroleum refiners, importers.
Industry......................................          325193            2869  Ethyl alcohol manufacturers.
Industry......................................          325199            2869  Other basic organic chemical
                                                                                 manufacturers.
Industry......................................          424690            5169  Chemical and allied products
                                                                                 merchant wholesalers.
Industry......................................          424710            5171  Petroleum bulk stations and
                                                                                 terminals.
Industry......................................          424720            5172  Petroleum and petroleum products
                                                                                 merchant wholesalers.
Industry......................................          454319            5989  Other fuel dealers.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\a\ North American Industry Classification System (NAICS).
\b\ Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) system code.

    This table is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a 
guide for readers regarding entities likely to be regulated by this 
action. This table lists the types of entities that EPA is now aware 
could be potentially regulated by this action. Other types of entities 
not listed in the table could also be regulated. To determine whether 
your entity is regulated by this action, you should carefully examine 
the applicability criteria of part 80, subpart K of title 40 of the 
Code of Federal Regulations. If you have any question regarding 
applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person 
in the preceding FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section above.

II. Renewable Fuel Standard Program Amendments

    EPA issued final regulations implementing the Renewable Fuel 
Standard Program on May 1, 2007. EPA subsequently identified a number 
of technical errors and ambiguities in the regulations and, in parallel 
proposed and direct final rules published on October 2, 2008, proposed 
to amend the regulations to correct these deficiencies. EPA received 
adverse comment on certain of the proposed changes, so, on November 26, 
2008, formally withdrew the portions of the direct final rule that were 
the subject of adverse comment. Those provisions consisted of 
amendments to 40 CFR 80.1129(b)(1) and 80.1129(b)(8) (providing that a 
party with a small refinery or small refiner exemption may only 
separate RINs that have been assigned to a volume of renewable fuel 
that the party blends into motor vehicle fuel), 40 CFR 80.1129(b)(4) 
(providing that any party may separate the RINs from renewable fuel 
that it produces or markets for use in motor vehicles, or uses in motor 
vehicles without further blending), and 40 CFR 80.1131(a)(8) and 
80.1131(b)(4) (changing the location in the RFS regulations of a 
provision stating that a RIN that is transferred to two or more parties 
is considered an invalid RIN unless EPA in its sole discretion 
determines that some portion of these RINs is valid). EPA published a 
parallel proposed rule (73 FR 57274) on the same day as the direct 
final rule. The proposed rule invited comment on the substance of the 
direct final rule and indicated that a second comment period would not 
be offered on the proposal in the event that portions of the direct 
final rule were withdrawn in response to adverse comment. In this 
action, we are responding to the comments received on the portions of 
the direct final rule that were withdrawn, and we are finalizing the 
proposed technical corrections with minor clarifying changes.

A. Separating RINs: Parties With Small Refiner or Small Refinery 
Exemption

    EPA proposed the addition of 40 CFR 80.1129(b)(8) and a conforming 
change to 80.1129(b)(1) to clarify that a party with a small refinery 
or small refiner exemption may only separate Renewable Identification 
Numbers (RINs) that have been assigned to a volume of renewable fuel 
that the party blends into motor vehicle fuel.
    In response to this proposed amendment, EPA received a comment 
which stated that the proposed 80.1129(b)(8) would result in the 
provision being overly broad. The comment further articulated a concern 
that EPA has mistakenly concluded that all refiners who have received 
either a small refiner exemption under 40 CFR 80.1142 or a small 
refinery exemption under 40 CFR 80.1141 are not obligated parties under 
the RFS program, and therefore, that those refiners may only separate 
RINs that have been assigned to volumes of renewable fuel that the 
refiner blends into motor vehicle fuel. Refiners who have received the 
small refinery exemption either are not obligated parties because they 
do not operate other non-exempt refineries or they are obligated 
parties because they do operate other non-exempt refineries. The 
commenter argued that the proposed technical amendment to add 40 CFR 
80.1129(b)(8), as written, applies to both groups, but that it should 
apply only to the former group of refiners and not the latter.
    EPA agrees with the comment and has added a clause to the final 
amendment to 40 80.1129(b)(8) to clarify our intention. Thus, the final 
rule states that it applies only to parties that have received a small 
refinery or small refiner exemption and who are ``not otherwise 
obligated parties.''

B. Separating RINs for Renewable Fuel Designated for Use as Motor 
Vehicle Fuel and Used as Motor Vehicle Fuel

    EPA proposed changes to 40 CFR 80.1129(b)(4) in order to clarify 
that any party, not just renewable fuel producers or importers, may 
separate the RINs from renewable fuel when it designates that fuel for 
use in motor vehicles and the renewable fuel is used in motor vehicles 
in that designated form.
    EPA received a comment on 80.1129(b)(4) which stated that that 
regulation should clarify that EPA intends the provision to apply to 
motor vehicle fuel used in its neat form, deposited directly into a 
motor vehicle fuel supply tank as motor vehicle fuel. In response, EPA 
confirms that the provision was originally meant to apply to neat 
renewable fuel that is designated for use as motor vehicle fuel, and is 
used as motor vehicle fuel in its designated form. In other words, the 
provision applies to neat renewable fuel that is directly used as motor 
vehicle fuel and is not blended any further. For purposes of the RFS 
program, ``neat renewable fuel'' is defined in 80.1101(p) as ``a 
renewable fuel to which only de minimis amounts of conventional 
gasoline or diesel have been added.'' Under the RFS program, denatured 
ethanol is considered neat renewable fuel, as is denatured ethanol with 
only an additional de minimis quantity of gasoline added. In the case 
of biodiesel, a biodiesel producer would be authorized under 
80.1129(b)(4) to separate RINs for B100 or B99 that it designates as 
motor vehicle fuel, providing that the fuel is in fact used that way.

[[Page 29950]]

    In contrast, any party that blends ethanol with more than a de 
minimis additional amount of gasoline beyond what is used for 
denaturing, or blends biodiesel with 20 volume percent or more of 
conventional diesel must separate any RINs assigned to that volume of 
renewable fuel, as required under 80.1129(b)(2). Biodiesel blends in 
which conventional diesel constitutes less than 20 volume percent and 
more than one percent are ineligible for RIN separation under any 
circumstances, as specified in 80.1129(b)(2) and (b)(5). As noted in 
the preamble to the final RFS regulations, it is EPA's understanding 
that in the vast majority of cases, biodiesel is blended with diesel in 
biodiesel concentrations of 80 volume percent or less. Therefore, EPA 
did not anticipate that this restriction would operate to significantly 
restrict biodiesel blending for fuel production, while it would afford 
some measure of protection against the possibility that renewable fuel 
producers could hold back RINs from obligated parties for the purpose 
of driving up their price. However, we may revisit this issue in a 
future RFS rulemaking since circumstances may change such that 
biodiesel blends of 81 percent or greater begin to be used more 
commonly as motor vehicle fuel.
    In the proposed technical amendments, EPA proposed to expand the 
parties eligible to separate RINS for neat renewable fuel to include 
any party that produces, imports, owns, sells or uses such fuel. EPA is 
finalizing the proposed change to 80.1129(b)(4) and, in response to 
comment, is clarifying that this section applies only to neat renewable 
fuel.
    In addition, EPA is making conforming amendments to 80.1151(b)(5) 
and 80.11129(b)5)(ii) to reflect the expanded applicability of 
80.1129(b)(4).

C. Duplicate RINs

    EPA proposed changes to 40 CFR 80.1131(a)(8) and 80.1131(b)(4), 
which consisted of changing the location in the RFS regulations of a 
provision stating that a RIN that is transferred to two or more parties 
is considered an invalid RIN unless EPA in its sole discretion 
determines that some portion of these RINs is valid.
    EPA received a comment which stated that EPA should not invalidate 
all duplicate RINs, but, rather, the party transferring duplicate RINs 
should be required to take appropriate actions such as notifying all 
parties who have received the duplicate RINs, determine which RINs are 
valid and which are invalid, and transfer replacement RINs to those 
parties that received invalid RINs.
    In response, EPA believes that if duplicate RINs are not made 
automatically invalid, problems associated with the duplicate RINs may 
be compounded downstream from the original duplication. For example, 
additional downstream transfers of duplicate RINs could occur if 
transferees are confused about which RINs are valid and which are not. 
EPA believes this type of confusion is minimized by automatically 
invalidating all RINs for which duplicates have been identified, and 
giving EPA sole discretion to determine if any of the duplicate RINs 
are valid. Since EPA received no comment on its proposed relocation of 
this provision within the RFS program regulations, EPA is finalizing 
the technical amendments to 40 CFR 80.1131(a)(8) and 80.1131(b)(4) as 
proposed.

III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

    Under Executive Order 12866, (58 FR 51735 (October 4, 1993)) the 
Agency must determine whether the regulatory action is ``significant'' 
and therefore subject to OMB review and the requirements of the 
Executive Order. The Order defines ``significant regulatory action'' as 
one that is likely to result in a rule that may:
    (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or 
adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the 
economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public 
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or 
communities;
    (2) Create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an 
action taken or planned by another agency;
    (3) Materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, 
user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients 
thereof; or
    (4) Raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal 
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in 
the Executive Order.
    It has been determined that this action is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under the terms of Executive Order 12866 and is 
therefore not subject to OMB review. This final rule simply makes minor 
technical changes to the RFS regulations and modifies certain 
requirements to make them less burdensome for regulated parties.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act

    This action does not impose any new information collection burden. 
This action makes minor technical corrections to the regulations and 
modifies certain requirements to lessen the burden on related parties 
while maintaining the overall goals of the program. None of the changes 
in the rule require any additional information collection burdens. The 
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has previously approved the 
information collection requirements contained in the existing 
regulations 40 CFR part 80, subpart K, under the provisions of the 
Paperwork Reduction Act, 44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. and has assigned OMB 
control number 2060-0600. The OMB control numbers for EPA's regulations 
in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA) generally requires an agency 
to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis of any rule subject to 
notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative 
Procedure Act or any other statute unless the agency certifies that the 
rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial 
number of small entities. Small entities include small businesses, 
small organizations, and small governmental jurisdictions.
    For purposes of assessing the impacts of today's rule on small 
entities, small entity is defined as: (1) A small business as defined 
by the Small Business Administration's (SBA) regulations at 13 CFR 
121.201; (2) a small governmental jurisdiction that is a government of 
a city, county, town, school district or special district with a 
population of less than 50,000; and (3) a small organization that is 
any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated 
and is not dominant in its field.
    In determining whether a rule has a significant economic impact on 
a substantial number of small entities, the impact of concern is any 
significant adverse economic impact on small entities, since the 
primary purpose of the regulatory flexibility analyses is to identify 
and address regulatory alternatives ``which minimize any significant 
economic impact of the rule on small entities.'' 5 U.S.C. 603 and 604. 
Thus, an agency may certify that a rule will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities if the rule 
relieves regulatory burden, or otherwise has a positive economic effect 
on all of the small entities subject to the rule. This action

[[Page 29951]]

makes minor technical corrections to the regulations and modifies 
certain requirements to lessen the burden on regulated parties. Thus, 
after considering the economic impacts of today's final rule on small 
entities, I certify that this action will not have a significant 
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities.

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    This rule does not contain a Federal mandate that may result in 
expenditures of $100 million or more for State, local, and tribal 
governments, in the aggregate, or the private sector in any one year. 
This action makes minor technical corrections to the RFS regulations 
and modifies certain provisions to lessen the requirements for 
regulated parties. As a result, this rule will have the overall effect 
of reducing the burden of the RFS regulations on regulated parties. 
Thus, this rule is not subject to the requirements of sections 202 or 
205 of UMRA.
    This rule is also not subject to the requirements of section 203 of 
UMRA because it contains no regulatory requirements that might 
significantly or uniquely affect small governments. It only applies to 
gasoline and renewable fuel producers, importers, distributors and 
marketers and makes minor corrections and modifications to the RFS 
regulations.

E. Executive Order 13132 (Federalism)

    Executive Order 13132, entitled ``Federalism'' (64 FR 43255, August 
10, 1999), requires EPA to develop an accountable process to ensure 
``meaningful and timely input by State and local officials in the 
development of regulatory policies that have Federalism implications.'' 
``Policies that have Federalism implications'' is defined in the 
Executive Order to include regulations that have ``substantial direct 
effects on the States, on the relationship between the national 
government and the States, or on the distribution of power and 
responsibilities among the various levels of government.''
    This final rule does not have Federalism implications. It will not 
have substantial direct effects on the States, on the relationship 
between the national government and the States, or on the distribution 
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government, 
as specified in Executive Order 13132. This action makes minor 
technical corrections and certain modifications that lessen the burden 
on related parties. Thus, Executive Order 13132 does not apply to this 
rule.

F. Executive Order 13175 (Consultation and Coordination With Indian 
Tribal Governments)

    This final rule does not have tribal implications, as specified in 
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). It applies to 
gasoline and renewable fuel producers, importers, distributors and 
marketers. This action makes minor corrections and modifications to the 
RFS regulations, and does not impose any enforceable duties on 
communities of Indian tribal governments. Thus, Executive Order 13175 
does not apply to this action.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental 
Health Risks and Safety Risks

    EPA interprets EO 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997) as applying 
only to those regulatory actions that concern health or safety risks, 
such that the analysis required under section 5-501 of the EO has the 
potential to influence the regulation. This action is not subject to EO 
13045 because it does not establish an environmental standard intended 
to mitigate health or safety risks.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions Concerning Regulations That 
Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use

    This rule is not subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 18355 (May 
22, 2001)), because it is not a significant regulatory action under 
Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act

    Section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement 
Act of 1995 (``NTTAA''), Public Law 104-113, 12(d) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) 
directs EPA to use voluntary consensus standards in its regulatory 
activities unless to do so would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., materials specifications, test methods, sampling 
procedures, and business practices) that are developed or adopted by 
voluntary consensus standards bodies. NTTAA directs EPA to provide 
Congress, through OMB, explanations when the Agency decides not to use 
available and applicable voluntary consensus standards.
    This action does not involve technical standards. Therefore, EPA 
did not consider the use of any voluntary consensus standards.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental 
Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

    Executive Order (EO) 12898 (59 FR 7629 (Feb. 16, 1994)) establishes 
Federal executive policy on environmental justice. Its main provision 
directs Federal agencies, to the greatest extent practicable and 
permitted by law, to make environmental justice part of their mission 
by identifying and addressing, as appropriate, disproportionately high 
and adverse human health or environmental effects of their programs, 
policies, and activities on minority populations and low-income 
populations in the United States.
    EPA has determined that this final rule will not have 
disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental 
effects on minority or low-income populations because it does not 
affect the level of protection provided to human health or the 
environment. These technical amendments do not relax the control 
measures on sources regulated by the RFS regulations and therefore will 
not cause emissions increases from these sources.

K. Congressional Review Act

    The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the 
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally 
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating 
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, 
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the 
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other 
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of 
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior 
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot 
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal 
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C. 
804(2).

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 80

    Environmental protection, Fuel additives, Gasoline, Imports, Motor 
vehicle pollution, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

    Dated: June 18, 2009.
Lisa P. Jackson,
Administrator.

0
40 CFR Part 80 is amended as follows:

[[Page 29952]]

PART 80-REGULATION OF FUEL AND FUEL ADDITIVES

0
1. The authority citation for part 80 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7414, 7542, 7545, and 7601(a).


0
2. Section 80.1129 is amended as follows:
0
a. By revising paragraph (b)(1).
0
b. By revising paragraph (b)(4).
0
c. By revising paragraph (b)(5)(ii).
0
d. By adding paragraph (b)(8).


Sec.  80.1129   Requirements for separating RINs from volumes of 
renewable fuel.

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (1) Except as provided in paragraphs (b)(6) and (b)(8) of this 
section, a party that is an obligated party according to Sec.  80.1106 
must separate any RINs that have been assigned to a volume of renewable 
fuel if they own that volume.
* * * * *
    (4) Any party that produces, imports, owns, sells or uses a volume 
of neat renewable fuel may separate any RINs that have been assigned to 
that volume of neat renewable fuel if the party designates the neat 
renewable fuel as motor vehicle fuel, and the neat renewable fuel is 
used as a motor vehicle fuel.
    (5) * * *
    (ii) This paragraph (b)(5) shall not apply to any party meeting the 
requirements of paragraph (b)(4) of this section.
* * * * *
    (8) For a party that has received a small refinery exemption under 
Sec.  80.1141 or a small refiner exemption under Sec.  80.1142, and who 
is not otherwise an obligated party, during the period of time that the 
small refinery or small refiner exemption is in effect the party may 
only separate RINs that have been assigned to volumes of renewable fuel 
that the party blends into motor vehicle fuel in accordance with 
paragraph (b)(2) of this section.
* * * * *
    3. Section 80.1131 is amended by adding paragraph (a)(8) and 
removing paragraph (b)(4) to read as follows:


Sec.  80.1131   Treatment of invalid RINs.

    (a) * * *
    (8) In the event that the same RIN is transferred to two or more 
parties, all such RINs will be deemed to be invalid, unless EPA in its 
sole discretion determines that some portion of these RINs is valid.
* * * * *
    4. Section 80.1151 is amended by revising paragraph (b)(5) to read 
as follows:


Sec.  80.1151   What are the recordkeeping requirements under the RFS 
program?

* * * * *
    (b) * * *
    (5) Records related to the production, importation, ownership, sale 
or use of any volume of neat renewable fuel that any party designates 
as motor vehicle fuel and uses as motor vehicle fuel.
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-14849 Filed 6-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.