Notice of Informational Filing, 30203-30204 [E9-14825]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 24, 2009 / Notices
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None.
DATE OF UPDATE:
June 3, 2009.
Dated: June 18, 2009.
Habib Azarsina,
Departmental Privacy Officer, 202–366–1965.
[FR Doc. E9–14837 Filed 6–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Application for Approval of
Discontinuance or Modification of a
Railroad Signal System or Relief From
the Requirements of Title 49 Code of
Federal Regulations Part 236
Pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Part 235 and 49
U.S.C. 20502(a), the following railroad
has petitioned the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) seeking approval
for the discontinuance or modification
of the signal system or relief from the
requirements of 49 CFR Part 236, as
detailed below.
Docket Number FRA–2009–0052.
Applicant: Norfolk Southern
Corporation, Mr. Donald D. Graab,
Assistant Vice-President Mechanical,
Mechanical Department, 1200 Peachtree
Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia 30309–
3579.
The Norfolk Southern Corporation
(NS) seeks relief from the requirements
of the Rules, Standards, and
Instructions, 49 CFR Part 236,
§§ 236.586 and 236.110. NS seeks a
waiver from compliance with § 236.586
Daily or after trip test, in its entirety for
locomotives equipped with UltraCab
equipment. NS seeks a waiver from that
portion of § 236.110 that requires
record-keeping and record retention for
tests performed under § 236.586.
The reason given for the proposed
changes is that UltraCab locomotive cab
signal equipment is microprocessorbased, and it is universally recognized
that this technology has provided vast
breakthroughs in advanced train stop
and train control equipment. These
systems offer improvements far superior
to their predecessors in performance,
reliability, and safety. Equipment is now
capable of checking itself several times
a second and verifying that the system
is functioning properly and that all
external inputs are valid.
Any interested party desiring to
protest the granting of an application
shall set forth specifically the grounds
upon which the protest is made, and
include a concise statement of the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Jun 23, 2009
Jkt 217001
interest of the party in the proceeding.
Additionally, one copy of the protest
shall be furnished to the applicant at the
address listed above.
FRA expects to be able to determine
these matters without an oral hearing.
However, if a specific request for an oral
hearing is accompanied by a showing
that the party is unable to adequately
present his or her position by written
statements, an application may be set
for public hearing.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2009–
0052) and may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Communications received within 45
days of the date of this notice will be
considered by FRA before final action is
taken. Comments received after that
date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
PO 00000
Frm 00163
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30203
Issued in Washington, DC on June 17,
2009.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9–14830 Filed 6–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Informational Filing
For informational purposes only, the
Federal Railroad Administration (FRA)
is providing notice that it has received
an informational filing from the BNSF
Railway Company (BNSF) to conduct
testing of Configuration IV of BNSF’s
Electronic Train Management System
(ETMS) submitted pursuant to Title 49
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR)
236.913. The informational filing is
described below, including the
submitting party and the requisite
docket number where the informational
filing and any related information may
be found. The document is available for
public inspection; however, FRA is not
accepting public comment on the
document.
BNSF Railway Company
[Docket Number FRA–2006–23687]
BNSF has submitted an informational
filing to FRA to begin operational
testing of ETMS Version IV on BNSF’s
Stampede Subdivision. This testing will
allow BNSF to obtain the necessary
assessments required to amend BNSF’s
currently approved Product Safety Plan
(PSP) for ETMS Version I for a future
submittal to FRA. In addition, this
testing will allow BNSF to substantiate
the ETMS technology on mountain
grade territory with freight operations.
The informational filing has been placed
under Docket Number FRA–2006–23687
and is available for public inspection.
Interested parties are invited to
review the informational filing and
associated documents at the DOT
Docket Management facility during
regular business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Room
W12–140, Washington, DC 20590. All
documents in the public docket are also
available for inspection and copying on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications received into any of
our dockets by name of the individual
submitting the document (or signing the
document, if submitted on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
30204
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 24, 2009 / Notices
You may review the DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(Volume 65, Number 70; Pages 19477–
78).
Issued in Washington, DC on June 17,
2009.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9–14825 Filed 6–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Petition for Waiver of Compliance
In accordance with Part 211 of Title
49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR),
notice is hereby given that the Federal
Railroad Administration (FRA) has
received a request for a waiver of
compliance from certain requirements
of its safety standards. The individual
petition is described below, including
the party seeking relief, the regulatory
provisions involved, the nature of the
relief being requested, and the
petitioner’s arguments in favor of relief.
BNSF Railway Company
[Waiver Petition Docket Number FRA–2009–
0048]
The BNSF Railway Company (BNSF)
requests a waiver of compliance from
the requirements of 49 CFR Part 240,
Qualification and Certification of
Locomotive Engineers, specifically,
§ 240.129. BNSF’s specific request is for
a waiver from the requirement that
locomotive engineers have annual
operational performance evaluations as
provided under the procedures pursuant
to Sections 240.129(b), (c), and (e).
Section 240.129(b) requires a railroad
to ‘‘have procedures for monitoring the
operational performance of those it has
determined as qualified as a locomotive
engineer.’’ Section 240.129(c) provides
the requirements of the procedures
referenced under (b), including that the
engineer ‘‘shall be annually monitored
(check ride) by a Designated Supervisor
of Locomotive Engineers’’ and is either
‘‘accompanied by the designated
supervisor’’ or ‘‘has his or her train
handling activities electronically
recorded.’’ BNSF has a program to
comply with these requirements.
Section 240.129(e) requires the railroad
to have an operational testing and
monitoring program in place, and to
perform at least one unannounced test
each calendar year. This program must
be designed to monitor compliance with
railroad operating rules and other
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Jun 23, 2009
Jkt 217001
directives, and to examine and test such
compliance.
BNSF is currently working to
implement an automatic control system
that will allow the engineer certification
database to connect directly to the crew
database. By connecting these systems,
BNSF will then be able to constantly
validate information to safeguard
against engineers falling outside of the
provisions of Section 240.129. Once this
system is fully functioning, individuals
who are not current on the check-ride
requirement or operational testing will
automatically be prevented from
operating a locomotive until such time
as they meet the requirements of this
rule. BNSF plans to have this system in
place and fully functional by the end of
August 2009. As a result, the relief
granted under this waiver request will
neither lead to a degradation of safety
nor to any conflict with the intent of the
rule.
BNSF has several employees certified
under 49 CFR Part 240 for service who
are not currently performing the duties
that require this certification. Some of
these individuals have bid on and taken
positions in other service, while others
have been furloughed. As a result, these
individuals are not in a position to
operate locomotives as an engineer.
BNSF requests relief from Section
240.129 to avoid having to perform
operational performance evaluations on
individuals who are currently out of
locomotive engineer service. Waiving
performance of these evaluations on
individuals not currently active as
locomotive engineers is consistent with
the general application of Part 240,
which applies to ‘‘any person who
operates locomotives.’’
These individuals are not operating
locomotives, nor will they be allowed to
operate locomotives under BNSF’s
control system. Performance of the
operational evaluation on individuals
not currently operating locomotives
causes safety concerns because it
requires calling a person in for the sole
purpose of an evaluation ride and also
because it would lead to those
individuals achieving technical
compliance with the rule only to go
back to prolonged service in areas other
than operation of locomotives. BNSF’s
proposal provides the operational
evaluation at a time prior to the full
operation of a locomotive, in
compliance with the rules, but also at a
time that is contemporary to the return
to the active operation of locomotives.
BNSF requests this waiver as a
method of ensuring that active
locomotive engineers receive timely and
appropriate training and monitoring as
required for compliance with the rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00164
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Through granting this waiver, BNSF
believes there will be no negative
impact on safety. As described, BNSF
will not permit any locomotive engineer
to operate a locomotive without being in
full compliance with Part 240, including
Section 129, of which relief is
requested. BNSF believes this process
will promote enhanced safety by
providing for the operational
performance evaluations to be done as
these engineers return to active engine
service such that safe operation is fresh
in their minds upon their return.
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2009–
0048) and may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Communications received within 45
days of the date of this notice will be
considered by FRA before final action is
taken. Comments received after that
date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.–5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30203-30204]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14825]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Railroad Administration
Notice of Informational Filing
For informational purposes only, the Federal Railroad
Administration (FRA) is providing notice that it has received an
informational filing from the BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) to conduct
testing of Configuration IV of BNSF's Electronic Train Management
System (ETMS) submitted pursuant to Title 49 Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) 236.913. The informational filing is described below,
including the submitting party and the requisite docket number where
the informational filing and any related information may be found. The
document is available for public inspection; however, FRA is not
accepting public comment on the document.
BNSF Railway Company
[Docket Number FRA-2006-23687]
BNSF has submitted an informational filing to FRA to begin
operational testing of ETMS Version IV on BNSF's Stampede Subdivision.
This testing will allow BNSF to obtain the necessary assessments
required to amend BNSF's currently approved Product Safety Plan (PSP)
for ETMS Version I for a future submittal to FRA. In addition, this
testing will allow BNSF to substantiate the ETMS technology on mountain
grade territory with freight operations. The informational filing has
been placed under Docket Number FRA-2006-23687 and is available for
public inspection.
Interested parties are invited to review the informational filing
and associated documents at the DOT Docket Management facility during
regular business hours (9 a.m.-5 p.m.) at 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590. All documents in the public docket
are also available for inspection and copying on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the electronic form of any written
communications received into any of our dockets by name of the
individual submitting the document (or signing the document, if
submitted on behalf of an association, business, labor union, etc.).
[[Page 30204]]
You may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 70; Pages
19477-78).
Issued in Washington, DC on June 17, 2009.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety Standards and Program
Development.
[FR Doc. E9-14825 Filed 6-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-06-P