Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Supplemental Notice of Intent to Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Planned 300 Line Project and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues, 30065-30067 [E9-14785]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 24, 2009 / Notices
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. PF09–1–000]
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company;
Supplemental Notice of Intent to
Prepare an Environmental Assessment
for the Planned 300 Line Project and
Request for Comments on
Environmental Issues
June 17, 2009.
As previously noticed on February 4,
2009, and supplemented herein, the
staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (FERC or Commission) is
preparing an environmental assessment
(EA) that will discuss the environmental
impacts that could result from the
construction and operation of the 300
Line Project. The project is planned by
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (TGP)
to expand the natural gas transportation
capacity of its existing 300 Line pipeline
in northern Pennsylvania and
northwestern New Jersey. The EA will
be used by the Commission in its
decision-making process to determine
whether the project is in the public
convenience and necessity.
This Supplemental Notice of Intent
(NOI) announces the opening of a
limited scoping period the Commission
will use to gather input from the public
and interested agencies on a new
alternative which will be included in
the EA, identified as the Eastern
Alternative Loop. This alternative
consists of about 2.2 miles at the eastern
end of the planned Loop 325 in Passaic
County, New Jersey and would replace
2.0 miles at the western end of Loop
325. Use of the alternative would avoid
crossing the Wallkill River National
Wildlife Refuge (WRNWR) in Sussex
County, New Jersey, if it is found to be
feasible in meeting the project
objectives. Your input will help
determine what issues need to be
evaluated in the EA regarding use of the
Eastern Alternative Loop. Please note
that this limited scoping period will
close on July 17, 2009.
This notice is being sent to
landowners who would be affected by
the Eastern Alternative Loop (including
those that would no longer be affected
by the 300 Line Project if this alternative
is ultimately approved by the
Commission); Federal, State, and local
government representatives and
agencies; environmental and public
interest groups; Native American tribes;
other interested parties; and local
libraries and newspapers. We encourage
government representatives to notify
their constituents of the Eastern
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Jun 23, 2009
Jkt 217001
Alternative Loop and encourage them to
comment on their areas of concern.
If you are a landowner receiving this
notice, you may be contacted by a
pipeline company representative about
the acquisition of an easement to
construct, operate, and maintain the
planned facilities. The pipeline
company would seek to negotiate a
mutually acceptable agreement.
However, if the 300 Line Project is
approved by the Commission, that
approval conveys with it the right of
eminent domain. Therefore, if easement
negotiations fail to produce an
agreement, the pipeline company could
initiate condemnation proceedings in
accordance with State law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC
entitled ‘‘An Interstate Natural Gas
Facility on My Land? What Do I Need
To Know?’’ is available for viewing on
the FERC Internet Web site (https://
www.ferc.gov). This fact sheet addresses
a number of typically asked questions,
including the use of eminent domain
and how to participate in the
Commission’s proceedings.
Summary of the Planned Project
TGP plans to request authorization to
construct, own, and operate the
facilities necessary to increase natural
gas delivery capacity to the northeast
region of the United States by
approximately 300,000 dekatherms per
day. In addition to increasing natural
gas delivery capacity to the region, TGP
would also upgrade certain existing
compressor units to improve overall
system reliability.
The 300 Line Project would consist of
the following facilities:
• Installation of approximately 128.4
miles of new 30-inch-diameter pipeline
and associated appurtenant
aboveground facilities in seven separate
looping 1 segments in Potter, Tioga,
Bradford, Susquehanna, Wayne, and
Pike Counties, Pennsylvania; and
Sussex and Passaic Counties, New
Jersey;
• construction of new compressor
stations in Venango and McKean
Counties, Pennsylvania;
• modifications to seven existing
compressor stations in Potter, Tioga,
Bradford, Susquehanna, and Pike
Counties, Pennsylvania, and Sussex
County, New Jersey, and to an existing
meter station in Bergen County, New
Jersey; and
• installation of associated
appurtenant aboveground facilities
1 A loop is a segment of pipeline that is usually
installed adjacent to an existing pipeline and
connected to it at both ends. The loop allows more
gas to be moved through the system.
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
30065
including mainline valves and pig 2
launchers and receivers.
Eastern Alternative Loop
This supplemental NOI concerns only
TGP’s planned Loop 325 in Sussex and
Passaic Counties, New Jersey. Planned
Loop 325 would begin at milepost (MP)
0.0 in Sussex County, and terminate at
MP 17.3 in Passaic County. As planned,
Loop 325 would cross the WRNWR from
approximate MPs 1.0 to 1.8.
The Eastern Alternative Loop would
begin approximately 2.0 miles to the
east of MP 0.0 and end approximately
2.2 miles to the east of MP 17.3. Thus,
the alternative would avoid impacts
from MPs 0.0 to 2.0 of Loop 325,
including the WRNWR, but would
impact areas that would not be affected
by TGP’s Loop 325 configuration. The
route would remain as initially planned
for the approximately 15.3-mile-long
segment between the eastern and
western portions of the loop whether
the Commission would approve either
the planned Loop 325 or the Eastern
Alternative Loop.
Maps depicting Loop 325 and Eastern
Alternative Loop are included in
appendix 1.3
Land Requirements
We have requested that TGP provide
additional information regarding the
Eastern Alternative Loop. However,
because the length of Loop 325 is
similar for TGP’s planned configuration
and the Eastern Alternative Loop, land
requirements for either configuration are
expected to be similar. In general, Loop
325 would be located within and
directly adjacent to the existing 300
Line right-of-way and at a typical offset
of 25 feet from the existing pipeline to
the extent practicable. The area
temporarily disturbed during
construction but not required for
operation would generally be allowed to
revert to pre-construction condition and
uses. The area required for operation of
Loop 325 would vary depending on the
width of TGP’s existing right-of-way,
but would generally be maintained in an
herbaceous state. Permanent structures
such as buildings would not be allowed
within the new, permanent right-of-way.
2 A pig is an internal tool that can be used to
clean and dry a pipeline and/or to inspect it for
damage or corrosion.
3 The appendices referenced in this notice are not
being printed in the Federal Register but were sent
to all those receiving this notice in the mail. Copies
of all appendices are available at https://
www.ferc.gov using the link called ‘‘eLibrary’’ or
from the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426, or call
(202) 502–8371. For instructions on connecting to
eLibrary, refer to the last page of this notice.
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
30066
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 24, 2009 / Notices
The EA Process
The National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) requires the Commission to
take into account the environmental
impacts that could result from an action
whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and
Necessity. NEPA also requires us 4 to
discover and address concerns the
public may have about proposals. This
process is referred to as ‘‘scoping.’’ The
main goal of the scoping process is to
focus the analysis in the EA on the
important environmental issues. By this
supplemental NOI, the Commission
requests public comments on the scope
of the issues to address in the EA
regarding the Eastern Alternative Loop.
All comments received will be
considered during the preparation of the
EA. State and local government
representatives are encouraged to notify
their constituents of this proposed
action and encourage them to comment
on their areas of concern.
In the EA, we will compare impacts
that could occur as a result of the
construction and operation of Loop 325
under these general headings:
• Geology and soils;
• land use;
• water resources, fisheries, and
wetlands;
• cultural resources;
• vegetation and wildlife;
• air quality and noise;
• endangered and threatened species;
and
• public safety.
We will also evaluate possible
alternatives to the planned project or
portions of the project, including the
Eastern Alternative Loop. Our analysis
will also include recommendations on
how to lessen or avoid impacts on the
various resource areas. Although no
formal application has been filed, we
have already initiated our NEPA review
under the Commission’s Pre-filing
Process. The purpose of the Pre-Filing
Process is to encourage early
involvement of interested stakeholders
and to identify and resolve issues before
an application is filed with the FERC.
As part of our Pre-filing Process review,
we have contacted Federal and State
agencies to discuss their involvement in
the scoping process and the preparation
of the EA. The FERC is the lead Federal
agency in the preparation of the EA, and
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and
the U.S. Bureau of Land Management
have agreed to participate as
cooperating agencies in the preparation
of the EA to satisfy their respective
4 ‘‘We’’, ‘‘us’’, and ‘‘our’’ refer to the
environmental staff of the Office of Energy Projects
(OEP).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Jun 23, 2009
Jkt 217001
NEPA responsibilities. Representatives
from the FERC also participated in
public open houses sponsored by TGP
in the project area in December 2008
and January 2009, to explain the
environmental review process to
interested stakeholders. The initial NOI
for this project was issued by the FERC
on February 4, 2009. In addition, we
conducted three public scoping
meetings in the project area to hear
public concerns and comments on the
planned project. One of these scoping
meetings was held near Loop 325 in
Vernon, New Jersey, on February 24,
2009.
Our independent analysis of the
issues will be presented in the EA. The
EA will be published and mailed to the
entities on our mailing list (see
discussion on how to remain on our list
under Environmental Mailing List
below). A 30-day comment period will
be allotted for review of the EA. We will
consider all comments on the EA before
we make our recommendations to the
Commission. To ensure your comments
are considered, please carefully follow
the instructions in the Public
Participation section below.
Currently Identified Environmental
Issues
We have already identified several
issues that we think deserve attention
based on a preliminary review of Loop
325 and the Eastern Alternative Loop.
This preliminary list of issues may be
changed based on your comments and
our analysis:
• Impacts on the WRNWR, which
would be crossed by the planned Loop
325 but avoided by the Eastern
Alternative Loop;
• impacts on lands under jurisdiction
of the New Jersey Highlands Act;
• potential impacts on nearby
residences;
• aesthetic impacts, including the
loss of trees in forested areas; and
• potential impacts on threatened or
endangered species including the
Indiana bat and the bog turtle.
Public Participation
You can make a difference by
providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about the Eastern
Alternative Loop. Your comments
should focus on the potential
environmental effects, reasonable
alternatives, and measures to avoid or
lessen environmental impacts. The more
specific your comments, the more useful
they will be. To ensure that your
comments are timely and properly
recorded, please send in your comments
so that they will be received in
PO 00000
Frm 00026
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Washington, DC on or before July 17,
2009.
For your convenience, there are three
methods you can use to submit your
written comments to the Commission.
In all instances, please reference the
project docket number PF09–1–000 with
your submission. The Commission
encourages electronic filing of
comments and has dedicated eFiling
expert staff available to assist you at
202–502–8258 or efiling@ferc.gov.
(1) You may file your comments
electronically by using the Quick
Comment feature, which is located on
the Commission’s Web site at https://
www.ferc.gov under the link to
Documents and Filings. A Quick
Comment is an easy method for
interested persons to submit text-only
comments on a project;
(2) You may file your comments
electronically by using the eFiling
feature, which is located on the
Commission’s Web site at https://
www.ferc.gov under the link to
Documents and Filings. eFiling involves
preparing your submission in the same
manner as you would if filing on paper,
and then saving the file on your
computer’s hard drive. You will attach
that file as your submission. New
eFiling users must first create an
account by clicking on ‘‘Sign up’’ or
‘‘eRegister.’’ You will be asked to select
the type of filing you are making. A
comment on a particular project is
considered a ‘‘Comment on a Filing’’; or
(3) You may file your comments via
mail to the Commission by sending an
original and two copies of your letter to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Room 1A,
Washington, DC 20426.
In all instances, please reference the
project docket number PF09–1–000 with
your submission. Label one copy of the
comments for the attention of Gas
Branch 1, PJ–11.1.
Environmental Mailing List
An effort is being made to send this
notice to all individuals, organizations,
and government entities interested in
and/or potentially affected by the first
2.0 miles of the planned Loop 325 and
the last 2.2 miles of the Eastern
Alternative Loop. This includes all
landowners who are potential right-ofway grantors or whose property may be
used temporarily for project purposes.
If you do not want to send comments
at this time but still want to remain on
our mailing list, please return the
Information Request (Appendix 2). If
you do not return the Information
Request, you will be taken off the
mailing list.
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 120 / Wednesday, June 24, 2009 / Notices
Becoming an Intervenor
Once TGP formally files its
application with the Commission, you
may want to become an ‘‘intervenor,’’
which is an official party to the
proceeding. Intervenors play a more
formal role in the process and are able
to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be
heard by the courts if they choose to
appeal the Commission’s final ruling.
An intervenor formally participates in a
Commission proceeding by filing a
request to intervene. Instructions for
becoming an intervenor are included in
the User’s Guide under the ‘‘eFiling’’
link on the Commission’s Web site.
Please note that you may not request
intervenor status at this time; you must
wait until the formal application is filed
with the Commission.
Availability of Additional Information
Additional information about the
project is available from the
Commission’s Office of External Affairs,
at 1–866–208–FERC or on the FERC
Web site (https://www.ferc.gov) using the
eLibrary link. Click on the eLibrary link,
click on ‘‘General Search’’ and enter the
docket number excluding the last three
digits in the Docket Number field. Be
sure you have selected an appropriate
date range. For assistance, please
contact FERC Online Support at
FercOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll free
at 1–866–208–3676, or for TTY, contact
(202)502–8659. The eLibrary link also
provides access to the texts of formal
documents issued by the Commission,
such as orders, notices, and
rulemakings.
In addition, the Commission now
offers a free service called eSubscription
which allows you to keep track of all
formal issuances and submittals in
specific dockets. This can reduce the
amount of time you spend researching
proceedings by automatically providing
you with notification of these filings,
document summaries and direct links to
the documents. Go to https://
www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm.
Public meetings or site visits will be
posted on the Commission’s calendar
located at https://www.ferc.gov/
EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx along
with other related information.
Finally, to request additional
information on the project or to provide
comments directly to the project
sponsor, you can contact TGP directly
by calling toll free at 1–866–683–5587.
Also, TGP has established a Web site at
https://www.elpaso.com/
tgp300lineproject/. The Web site
includes a description of the project, an
overview map of the planned facilities,
and links to related documents. TGP
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:46 Jun 23, 2009
Jkt 217001
will update the Web site as the
environmental review of its project
proceeds.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–14785 Filed 6–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. ER09–1278–000]
AES Mountain Wind, LLC;
Supplemental Notice That Initial
Market-Based Rate Filing Includes
Request for Blanket Section 204
Authorization
30067
The filings in the above-referenced
proceeding are accessible in the
Commission’s eLibrary system by
clicking on the appropriate link in the
above list.
They are also available for review in
the Commission’s Public Reference
Room in Washington, DC. There is an
eSubscription link on the Web site that
enables subscribers to receive e-mail
notification when a document is added
to a subscribed dockets(s). For
assistance with any FERC Online
service, please e-mail
FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov. or call
(866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call
(202) 502–8659.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–14794 Filed 6–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717–01–P
June 17, 2009.
This is a supplemental notice in the
above-referenced proceeding of AES
Mountain Wind, LLC’s application for
market-based rate authority, with an
accompanying rate tariff, noting that
such application includes a request for
blanket authorization, under 18 CFR
part 34, of future issuances of securities
and assumptions of liability.
Any person desiring to intervene or to
protest should file with the Federal
Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,
in accordance with Rules 211 and 214
of the Commission’s Rules of Practice
and Procedure (18 CFR 385.211 and
385.214). Anyone filing a motion to
intervene or protest must serve a copy
of that document on the Applicant.
Notice is hereby given that the
deadline for filing protests with regard
to the applicant’s request for blanket
authorization, under 18 CFR part 34, of
future issuances of securities and
assumptions of liability, is July 16,
2009.
The Commission encourages
electronic submission of protests and
interventions in lieu of paper, using the
FERC Online links at https://
www.ferc.gov. To facilitate electronic
service, persons with Internet access
who will eFile a document and/or be
listed as a contact for an intervenor
must create and validate an
eRegistration account using the
eRegistration link. Select the eFiling
link to log on and submit the
intervention or protests.
Persons unable to file electronically
should submit an original and 14 copies
of the intervention or protest to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission,
888 First St., NE., Washington, DC
20426.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission
[Docket No. RM06–22–006; Order No. 706–
C]
Mandatory Reliability Standards for
Critical Infrastructure Protection
Issued June 18, 2009.
AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Order denying request for
clarification.
SUMMARY: On March 19, 2009, the
Commission issued Order No. 706–B
which clarified the scope of Critical
Infrastructure Protection Reliability
Standards which were approved in
Commission Order No. 706. The
Commission is denying a request for
clarification of Order No. 706–B filed by
the Edison Electric Institute.
DATES: Effective Date: This rule will
become effective June 24, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonathan First (Legal Information),
Office of General Counsel, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,
(202) 502–8529.
Regis Binder (Technical Information),
Office of Electric Reliability, 888 First
Street, NE., Washington, DC 20426,
(301) 665–1601.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Before Commissioners: Jon Wellinghoff,
Chairman; Suedeen G. Kelly, Marc Spitzer,
and Philip D. Moeller.
Order Denying Request for Clarification
Issued June 18, 2009.
1. In this order, the Commission
denies the Edison Electric Institute’s
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 120 (Wednesday, June 24, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30065-30067]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14785]
[[Page 30065]]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
[Docket No. PF09-1-000]
Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company; Supplemental Notice of Intent to
Prepare an Environmental Assessment for the Planned 300 Line Project
and Request for Comments on Environmental Issues
June 17, 2009.
As previously noticed on February 4, 2009, and supplemented herein,
the staff of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC or
Commission) is preparing an environmental assessment (EA) that will
discuss the environmental impacts that could result from the
construction and operation of the 300 Line Project. The project is
planned by Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company (TGP) to expand the natural
gas transportation capacity of its existing 300 Line pipeline in
northern Pennsylvania and northwestern New Jersey. The EA will be used
by the Commission in its decision-making process to determine whether
the project is in the public convenience and necessity.
This Supplemental Notice of Intent (NOI) announces the opening of a
limited scoping period the Commission will use to gather input from the
public and interested agencies on a new alternative which will be
included in the EA, identified as the Eastern Alternative Loop. This
alternative consists of about 2.2 miles at the eastern end of the
planned Loop 325 in Passaic County, New Jersey and would replace 2.0
miles at the western end of Loop 325. Use of the alternative would
avoid crossing the Wallkill River National Wildlife Refuge (WRNWR) in
Sussex County, New Jersey, if it is found to be feasible in meeting the
project objectives. Your input will help determine what issues need to
be evaluated in the EA regarding use of the Eastern Alternative Loop.
Please note that this limited scoping period will close on July 17,
2009.
This notice is being sent to landowners who would be affected by
the Eastern Alternative Loop (including those that would no longer be
affected by the 300 Line Project if this alternative is ultimately
approved by the Commission); Federal, State, and local government
representatives and agencies; environmental and public interest groups;
Native American tribes; other interested parties; and local libraries
and newspapers. We encourage government representatives to notify their
constituents of the Eastern Alternative Loop and encourage them to
comment on their areas of concern.
If you are a landowner receiving this notice, you may be contacted
by a pipeline company representative about the acquisition of an
easement to construct, operate, and maintain the planned facilities.
The pipeline company would seek to negotiate a mutually acceptable
agreement. However, if the 300 Line Project is approved by the
Commission, that approval conveys with it the right of eminent domain.
Therefore, if easement negotiations fail to produce an agreement, the
pipeline company could initiate condemnation proceedings in accordance
with State law.
A fact sheet prepared by the FERC entitled ``An Interstate Natural
Gas Facility on My Land? What Do I Need To Know?'' is available for
viewing on the FERC Internet Web site (https://www.ferc.gov). This fact
sheet addresses a number of typically asked questions, including the
use of eminent domain and how to participate in the Commission's
proceedings.
Summary of the Planned Project
TGP plans to request authorization to construct, own, and operate
the facilities necessary to increase natural gas delivery capacity to
the northeast region of the United States by approximately 300,000
dekatherms per day. In addition to increasing natural gas delivery
capacity to the region, TGP would also upgrade certain existing
compressor units to improve overall system reliability.
The 300 Line Project would consist of the following facilities:
Installation of approximately 128.4 miles of new 30-inch-
diameter pipeline and associated appurtenant aboveground facilities in
seven separate looping \1\ segments in Potter, Tioga, Bradford,
Susquehanna, Wayne, and Pike Counties, Pennsylvania; and Sussex and
Passaic Counties, New Jersey;
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ A loop is a segment of pipeline that is usually installed
adjacent to an existing pipeline and connected to it at both ends.
The loop allows more gas to be moved through the system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
construction of new compressor stations in Venango and
McKean Counties, Pennsylvania;
modifications to seven existing compressor stations in
Potter, Tioga, Bradford, Susquehanna, and Pike Counties, Pennsylvania,
and Sussex County, New Jersey, and to an existing meter station in
Bergen County, New Jersey; and
installation of associated appurtenant aboveground
facilities including mainline valves and pig \2\ launchers and
receivers.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ A pig is an internal tool that can be used to clean and dry
a pipeline and/or to inspect it for damage or corrosion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eastern Alternative Loop
This supplemental NOI concerns only TGP's planned Loop 325 in
Sussex and Passaic Counties, New Jersey. Planned Loop 325 would begin
at milepost (MP) 0.0 in Sussex County, and terminate at MP 17.3 in
Passaic County. As planned, Loop 325 would cross the WRNWR from
approximate MPs 1.0 to 1.8.
The Eastern Alternative Loop would begin approximately 2.0 miles to
the east of MP 0.0 and end approximately 2.2 miles to the east of MP
17.3. Thus, the alternative would avoid impacts from MPs 0.0 to 2.0 of
Loop 325, including the WRNWR, but would impact areas that would not be
affected by TGP's Loop 325 configuration. The route would remain as
initially planned for the approximately 15.3-mile-long segment between
the eastern and western portions of the loop whether the Commission
would approve either the planned Loop 325 or the Eastern Alternative
Loop.
Maps depicting Loop 325 and Eastern Alternative Loop are included
in appendix 1.\3\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ The appendices referenced in this notice are not being
printed in the Federal Register but were sent to all those receiving
this notice in the mail. Copies of all appendices are available at
https://www.ferc.gov using the link called ``eLibrary'' or from the
Commission's Public Reference Room, 888 First Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20426, or call (202) 502-8371. For instructions on
connecting to eLibrary, refer to the last page of this notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Land Requirements
We have requested that TGP provide additional information regarding
the Eastern Alternative Loop. However, because the length of Loop 325
is similar for TGP's planned configuration and the Eastern Alternative
Loop, land requirements for either configuration are expected to be
similar. In general, Loop 325 would be located within and directly
adjacent to the existing 300 Line right-of-way and at a typical offset
of 25 feet from the existing pipeline to the extent practicable. The
area temporarily disturbed during construction but not required for
operation would generally be allowed to revert to pre-construction
condition and uses. The area required for operation of Loop 325 would
vary depending on the width of TGP's existing right-of-way, but would
generally be maintained in an herbaceous state. Permanent structures
such as buildings would not be allowed within the new, permanent right-
of-way.
[[Page 30066]]
The EA Process
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires the
Commission to take into account the environmental impacts that could
result from an action whenever it considers the issuance of a
Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. NEPA also requires us
\4\ to discover and address concerns the public may have about
proposals. This process is referred to as ``scoping.'' The main goal of
the scoping process is to focus the analysis in the EA on the important
environmental issues. By this supplemental NOI, the Commission requests
public comments on the scope of the issues to address in the EA
regarding the Eastern Alternative Loop. All comments received will be
considered during the preparation of the EA. State and local government
representatives are encouraged to notify their constituents of this
proposed action and encourage them to comment on their areas of
concern.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ ``We'', ``us'', and ``our'' refer to the environmental staff
of the Office of Energy Projects (OEP).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the EA, we will compare impacts that could occur as a result of
the construction and operation of Loop 325 under these general
headings:
Geology and soils;
land use;
water resources, fisheries, and wetlands;
cultural resources;
vegetation and wildlife;
air quality and noise;
endangered and threatened species; and
public safety.
We will also evaluate possible alternatives to the planned project
or portions of the project, including the Eastern Alternative Loop. Our
analysis will also include recommendations on how to lessen or avoid
impacts on the various resource areas. Although no formal application
has been filed, we have already initiated our NEPA review under the
Commission's Pre-filing Process. The purpose of the Pre-Filing Process
is to encourage early involvement of interested stakeholders and to
identify and resolve issues before an application is filed with the
FERC. As part of our Pre-filing Process review, we have contacted
Federal and State agencies to discuss their involvement in the scoping
process and the preparation of the EA. The FERC is the lead Federal
agency in the preparation of the EA, and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the U.S. Bureau of Land Management have agreed to
participate as cooperating agencies in the preparation of the EA to
satisfy their respective NEPA responsibilities. Representatives from
the FERC also participated in public open houses sponsored by TGP in
the project area in December 2008 and January 2009, to explain the
environmental review process to interested stakeholders. The initial
NOI for this project was issued by the FERC on February 4, 2009. In
addition, we conducted three public scoping meetings in the project
area to hear public concerns and comments on the planned project. One
of these scoping meetings was held near Loop 325 in Vernon, New Jersey,
on February 24, 2009.
Our independent analysis of the issues will be presented in the EA.
The EA will be published and mailed to the entities on our mailing list
(see discussion on how to remain on our list under Environmental
Mailing List below). A 30-day comment period will be allotted for
review of the EA. We will consider all comments on the EA before we
make our recommendations to the Commission. To ensure your comments are
considered, please carefully follow the instructions in the Public
Participation section below.
Currently Identified Environmental Issues
We have already identified several issues that we think deserve
attention based on a preliminary review of Loop 325 and the Eastern
Alternative Loop. This preliminary list of issues may be changed based
on your comments and our analysis:
Impacts on the WRNWR, which would be crossed by the
planned Loop 325 but avoided by the Eastern Alternative Loop;
impacts on lands under jurisdiction of the New Jersey
Highlands Act;
potential impacts on nearby residences;
aesthetic impacts, including the loss of trees in forested
areas; and
potential impacts on threatened or endangered species
including the Indiana bat and the bog turtle.
Public Participation
You can make a difference by providing us with your specific
comments or concerns about the Eastern Alternative Loop. Your comments
should focus on the potential environmental effects, reasonable
alternatives, and measures to avoid or lessen environmental impacts.
The more specific your comments, the more useful they will be. To
ensure that your comments are timely and properly recorded, please send
in your comments so that they will be received in Washington, DC on or
before July 17, 2009.
For your convenience, there are three methods you can use to submit
your written comments to the Commission. In all instances, please
reference the project docket number PF09-1-000 with your submission.
The Commission encourages electronic filing of comments and has
dedicated eFiling expert staff available to assist you at 202-502-8258
or efiling@ferc.gov.
(1) You may file your comments electronically by using the Quick
Comment feature, which is located on the Commission's Web site at
https://www.ferc.gov under the link to Documents and Filings. A Quick
Comment is an easy method for interested persons to submit text-only
comments on a project;
(2) You may file your comments electronically by using the eFiling
feature, which is located on the Commission's Web site at https://www.ferc.gov under the link to Documents and Filings. eFiling involves
preparing your submission in the same manner as you would if filing on
paper, and then saving the file on your computer's hard drive. You will
attach that file as your submission. New eFiling users must first
create an account by clicking on ``Sign up'' or ``eRegister.'' You will
be asked to select the type of filing you are making. A comment on a
particular project is considered a ``Comment on a Filing''; or
(3) You may file your comments via mail to the Commission by
sending an original and two copies of your letter to:
Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888
First Street, NE., Room 1A, Washington, DC 20426.
In all instances, please reference the project docket number PF09-
1-000 with your submission. Label one copy of the comments for the
attention of Gas Branch 1, PJ-11.1.
Environmental Mailing List
An effort is being made to send this notice to all individuals,
organizations, and government entities interested in and/or potentially
affected by the first 2.0 miles of the planned Loop 325 and the last
2.2 miles of the Eastern Alternative Loop. This includes all landowners
who are potential right-of-way grantors or whose property may be used
temporarily for project purposes.
If you do not want to send comments at this time but still want to
remain on our mailing list, please return the Information Request
(Appendix 2). If you do not return the Information Request, you will be
taken off the mailing list.
[[Page 30067]]
Becoming an Intervenor
Once TGP formally files its application with the Commission, you
may want to become an ``intervenor,'' which is an official party to the
proceeding. Intervenors play a more formal role in the process and are
able to file briefs, appear at hearings, and be heard by the courts if
they choose to appeal the Commission's final ruling. An intervenor
formally participates in a Commission proceeding by filing a request to
intervene. Instructions for becoming an intervenor are included in the
User's Guide under the ``eFiling'' link on the Commission's Web site.
Please note that you may not request intervenor status at this time;
you must wait until the formal application is filed with the
Commission.
Availability of Additional Information
Additional information about the project is available from the
Commission's Office of External Affairs, at 1-866-208-FERC or on the
FERC Web site (https://www.ferc.gov) using the eLibrary link. Click on
the eLibrary link, click on ``General Search'' and enter the docket
number excluding the last three digits in the Docket Number field. Be
sure you have selected an appropriate date range. For assistance,
please contact FERC Online Support at FercOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or
toll free at 1-866-208-3676, or for TTY, contact (202)502-8659. The
eLibrary link also provides access to the texts of formal documents
issued by the Commission, such as orders, notices, and rulemakings.
In addition, the Commission now offers a free service called
eSubscription which allows you to keep track of all formal issuances
and submittals in specific dockets. This can reduce the amount of time
you spend researching proceedings by automatically providing you with
notification of these filings, document summaries and direct links to
the documents. Go to https://www.ferc.gov/esubscribenow.htm.
Public meetings or site visits will be posted on the Commission's
calendar located at https://www.ferc.gov/EventCalendar/EventsList.aspx
along with other related information.
Finally, to request additional information on the project or to
provide comments directly to the project sponsor, you can contact TGP
directly by calling toll free at 1-866-683-5587. Also, TGP has
established a Web site at https://www.elpaso.com/tgp300lineproject/. The
Web site includes a description of the project, an overview map of the
planned facilities, and links to related documents. TGP will update the
Web site as the environmental review of its project proceeds.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-14785 Filed 6-23-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P