Safety Zone; Thunder on Niagara, Niagara River, North Tonawanda, NY, 29129-29131 [E9-14382]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 117 / Friday, June 19, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Congressional Review Act
This action pertains to agency
organization and management and does
not substantially affect the rights or
obligations of non-agency parties.
Accordingly, it is not a ‘‘rule’’ as that
term is used by the Congressional
Review Act (Subtitle E of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (SBREFA)).
Therefore, the reporting requirement of
5 U.S.C. 801 does not apply.
List of Subjects in 28 CFR Part 0
Authority delegations (Government
agencies), Government employees,
Organization and functions
(Government agencies).
Accordingly, by virtue of the authority
vested in me as Attorney General,
including 5 U.S.C. 301 and 28 U.S.C.
509 and 510, part 0 of title 28 of the
Code of Federal Regulations is amended
as follows:
■
PART 0—ORGANIZATION OF THE
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
1. The authority citation for part 0
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 28 U.S.C. 509,
510, 515–19.
§ 0.23a
[Redesignated as § 0.24]
2. Section 0.23a, currently under
Subpart D–2, is redesignated as § 0.24,
transferred to new Subpart D–3, and
revised to read as follows:
■
Subpart D–3—Office of Information
Policy
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
§ 0.24
General functions.
The Office of Information Policy shall
be headed by a Director appointed by
the Attorney General. The Director shall
report to the Associate Attorney
General. The following functions are
assigned to, and shall be conducted,
handled, or supervised by the Director
of the Office of Information Policy:
(a) Exercising the power and
performing the functions vested in the
Attorney General under 5 U.S.C. 552(e).
(b) Developing, coordinating, and
implementing policy with regard to the
Freedom of Information Act (‘‘FOIA’’),
including publishing guidance and
other material related to FOIA matters;
(c) Providing legal assistance and
advice to government agencies and
organizational components of the
Department on questions regarding the
interpretation and application of the
FOIA;
(d) Undertaking, arranging, or
supporting training and informational
programs concerning the FOIA for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:33 Jun 18, 2009
Jkt 217001
government agencies and the
Department;
(e) Responding to initial requests
made under the FOIA and the Privacy
Act for the Office of Information Policy,
as well as for the following Leadership
Offices:
(i) Office of the Attorney General;
(ii) Office of the Deputy Attorney
General;
(iii) Office of the Associate Attorney
General;
(iv) Office of Legal Policy;
(v) Office of Legislative Affairs;
(vi) Office of Public Affairs;
(vii) Office of Intergovernmental and
Public Liaison; and
(viii) Any other Department
component that the Attorney General
assigns to the Office of Information
Policy for responding to requests made
to such component under the FOIA and
the Privacy Act.
(f) Acting on behalf of the Attorney
General on FOIA and Privacy Act access
administrative appeals for all
components of the Department, except
that a denial of a request by the
Attorney General is the final action of
the Department on that request;
(g) Representing government agencies
in civil litigation claims arising under
the FOIA through and under the
direction of the United States Attorney’s
Office for the District of Columbia and
any such other districts as may be
designated;
(h) Providing staff support to the
Department Review Committee,
established by § 17.14 of this chapter;
and
(i) Encouraging all Federal agencies
that intend to deny FOIA requests
raising novel issues to consult with the
Office of Information Policy to the
extent practicable.
Dated: June 12, 2009.
Eric H. Holder, Jr.,
Attorney General.
[FR Doc. E9–14413 Filed 6–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–BE–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0110]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Thunder on Niagara,
Niagara River, North Tonawanda, NY
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29129
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing of a safety zone for a
powerboat race in the Captain of the
Port Buffalo zone. This rule is intended
to restrict vessels from areas of water
during events that pose a hazard to
public safety. The safety zone
established by this rule is necessary to
protect spectators, participants, and
vessels from the hazards associated with
a powerboat race.
DATES: This rule is effective from 11
a.m. August 29, 2009 to 6 p.m. August
30, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2009–0110 and are
available online at https://
www.regulations.gov, selecting the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, inserting USCG–
2009–0110 in the Docket ID box,
pressing Enter, and then clicking on the
item in the Docket ID column. This
material is also available for inspection
or copying at two locations: The Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays and the Coast
Guard Sector Buffalo, 1 Fuhrmann Blvd,
Buffalo, NY 14203 between 8 a.m. and
4 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call Lieutenant Brian Sadler,
Prevention Department, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector Buffalo, at (716) 843–9385.
If you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On April 30, 2009, we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled Safety Zone; Thunder on
Niagara, Niagara River, North
Tonawanda, NY in the Federal Register
(74 FR 82). We received no comments
on the proposed rule. No public meeting
was requested, and none was held.
Background and Purpose
Temporary safety zones are necessary
to ensure the safety of vessels and
spectators from the hazards associated
with powerboat races. Based on recent
accidents that have occurred in other
Captain of the Port zones, the Captain of
E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM
19JNR1
29130
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 117 / Friday, June 19, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
the Port Buffalo, has determined
powerboat races pose significant risks to
public safety and property. The likely
combination of large numbers of
recreational vessels, congested
waterways, and alcohol use, could
easily result in serious injuries or
fatalities.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
There were no comments made to the
proposed rule. Therefore, the temporary
final rule is the same as the proposed
rule.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
The Coast Guard’s use of this safety
zone will be periodic in nature, of short
duration, and designed to minimize the
impact on navigable waters. This safety
zone will only be enforced immediately
before and during the time the event
occurs. Furthermore, this safety zone
has been designed to allow vessels to
transit unrestricted to portions of the
waterway not affected by the safety
zone. The Coast Guard expects
insignificant adverse impact to mariners
from the activation of this safety zone.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This temporary final rule may affect
the following entities, some of which
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:33 Jun 18, 2009
Jkt 217001
might be small entities: The owners of
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in the area designated as the
safety zone by this rule. This safety zone
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities for the following reasons. The
safety zone in this temporary final rule
would be in effect for short periods of
time and only once per year. The safety
zone has been designed to allow traffic
to pass safely around the zone whenever
possible and vessels will be allowed to
pass through the zone with the
permission of the Captain of the Port.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process. Collection of
Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM
19JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 117 / Friday, June 19, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves a regulated navigation area and
as such is covered by this paragraph.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
(1) All persons and vessels must
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the
designated on scene patrol personnel.
Coast Guard patrol personnel include
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the U.S. Coast Guard. Upon
being hailed by a U.S. Coast Guard
vessel via siren, radio, flashing light, or
other means, the operator shall proceed
as directed.
(2) Commercial vessels may request
permission from the Captain of the Port
Buffalo to transit the safety zone.
Approval will be made on a case-bycase basis. Requests must be made in
advance and approved by the Captain of
the Port before transits will be
authorized. The Captain of the Port may
be contacted via U.S. Coast Guard
Sector Buffalo on Channel 16, VHF–FM.
Dated: May 29, 2009.
R.S. Burchell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. E9–14382 Filed 6–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
33 CFR Part 165
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0472]
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add new temporary § 165.T09–
0110 to read as follows:
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
§ 165.T09–0110 Safety Zone; Thunder on
Niagara, Niagara River, North Tonawanda,
NY.
(a) Location. The following area is a
temporary safety zone: all waters of the
Upper Niagara River, North Tonawanda,
NY within two miles of the Grand
Island Bridge located at 42°03′36″ N,
078°54′45″ W to 43°03′09″ N, 078°55′21″
W to 43°03′00″ N, 078°53′42″ W to
43°02′42″ N, 078°54′09″ W. All
Geographic coordinates are North
American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
(b) Effective Period. This regulation is
effective from 11 a.m. August 29, 2009
to 6 p.m. August 30, 2009. This zone
will be enforced from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m.
on August 29, 2009 and August 30,
2009.
(c) Regulations. The general
regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23
apply.
14:33 Jun 18, 2009
Jkt 217001
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of enforcement of
regulation.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
■
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Safety Zones: Annual Events
Requiring Safety Zones in the Captain
of the Port Buffalo Zone
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard will enforce
the safety zones for annual fireworks
displays in the Captain of the Port
Buffalo Zone during June 1, 2009
through June 30, 2009. This action is
necessary for the safety of life and
property on navigable waters during
these events. During the enforcement
period, no person or vessel may enter
the safety zones without the permission
of the Captain of the Port Buffalo.
DATES: The regulations in 33 CFR
165.939(a)(10) and (a)(12) will be
enforced on June 26, 2009 at 9:30 p.m.
to 10:30 p.m. and June 27, 2009 at 8
p.m. to 10 p.m. respectively.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this notice, call
or e-mail LT Brian Sadler, Waterways
Management Division Chief, Coast
Guard Sector Buffalo, 1 Fuhrmann
Blvd., Buffalo, NY 14203; telephone
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
29131
716–843–9573, e-mail
Brian.L.Sadler@USCG.MIL.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
The Coast Guard will enforce the
safety zone for the City of Syracuse
Fireworks Celebration on Onondaga
Lake Inner Harbor, Syracuse, NY in 33
CFR 165.939(a)(10) on June 26, 2009
from 9:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. and the
safety zone for Rochester Harbor and
Carousel Festival Fireworks on the
Genesee River at Lake Ontario,
Rochester, NY in 33 CFR 165.939(a)(12)
on June 27, 2009 from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m.
These regulations can be found in the
May 19, 2008 issue of the Federal
Register (73 FR 28704).
Under the provisions of 33 CFR
165.20, entry into, transiting, or
anchoring within these safety zones is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Buffalo or his
designated representative. Vessels that
wish to transit through the safety zones
may request permission from the
Captain of the Port Buffalo. Requests
must be made in advance and approved
by the Captain of Port before transits
will be authorized. Approvals will be
granted on a case by case basis. The
Captain of the Port may be contacted via
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo on
channel 16, VHF–FM. The Coast Guard
will give notice to the public via a
Broadcast to Mariners that the
regulation is in effect.
This notice is issued under authority
of 33 CFR 165.939 and 5 U.S.C. 552(a).
If the District Commander, Captain of
the Port, or other official authorized to
do so, determines that the regulated area
need not be enforced for the full
duration stated in this notice, he or she
may use a Broadcast Notice to Mariners
to grant general permission to enter the
safety zone.
Dated: June 4, 2009.
R.S. Burchell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. E9–14384 Filed 6–18–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0478]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Southside Summer
Fireworks, St. Clair River, Port Huron,
MI
AGENCY:
E:\FR\FM\19JNR1.SGM
Coast Guard, DHS.
19JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 117 (Friday, June 19, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 29129-29131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14382]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2009-0110]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Thunder on Niagara, Niagara River, North Tonawanda,
NY
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing of a safety zone for a
powerboat race in the Captain of the Port Buffalo zone. This rule is
intended to restrict vessels from areas of water during events that
pose a hazard to public safety. The safety zone established by this
rule is necessary to protect spectators, participants, and vessels from
the hazards associated with a powerboat race.
DATES: This rule is effective from 11 a.m. August 29, 2009 to 6 p.m.
August 30, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble as being available in the docket,
are part of docket USCG-2009-0110 and are available online at https://www.regulations.gov, selecting the Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, inserting USCG-2009-0110 in the Docket ID
box, pressing Enter, and then clicking on the item in the Docket ID
column. This material is also available for inspection or copying at
two locations: The Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department
of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays and the Coast Guard
Sector Buffalo, 1 Fuhrmann Blvd, Buffalo, NY 14203 between 8 a.m. and 4
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call Lieutenant Brian Sadler, Prevention Department,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo, at (716) 843-9385. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee
V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
On April 30, 2009, we published a notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM) entitled Safety Zone; Thunder on Niagara, Niagara River, North
Tonawanda, NY in the Federal Register (74 FR 82). We received no
comments on the proposed rule. No public meeting was requested, and
none was held.
Background and Purpose
Temporary safety zones are necessary to ensure the safety of
vessels and spectators from the hazards associated with powerboat
races. Based on recent accidents that have occurred in other Captain of
the Port zones, the Captain of
[[Page 29130]]
the Port Buffalo, has determined powerboat races pose significant risks
to public safety and property. The likely combination of large numbers
of recreational vessels, congested waterways, and alcohol use, could
easily result in serious injuries or fatalities.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
There were no comments made to the proposed rule. Therefore, the
temporary final rule is the same as the proposed rule.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
The Coast Guard's use of this safety zone will be periodic in
nature, of short duration, and designed to minimize the impact on
navigable waters. This safety zone will only be enforced immediately
before and during the time the event occurs. Furthermore, this safety
zone has been designed to allow vessels to transit unrestricted to
portions of the waterway not affected by the safety zone. The Coast
Guard expects insignificant adverse impact to mariners from the
activation of this safety zone.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This temporary final rule may affect the following entities, some
of which might be small entities: The owners of operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in the area designated as the safety
zone by this rule. This safety zone would not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the
following reasons. The safety zone in this temporary final rule would
be in effect for short periods of time and only once per year. The
safety zone has been designed to allow traffic to pass safely around
the zone whenever possible and vessels will be allowed to pass through
the zone with the permission of the Captain of the Port.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), in the NPRM we offered to
assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they could
better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking
process. Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
[[Page 29131]]
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves a regulated navigation
area and as such is covered by this paragraph.
An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add new temporary Sec. 165.T09-0110 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T09-0110 Safety Zone; Thunder on Niagara, Niagara River,
North Tonawanda, NY.
(a) Location. The following area is a temporary safety zone: all
waters of the Upper Niagara River, North Tonawanda, NY within two miles
of the Grand Island Bridge located at 42[deg]03'36'' N, 078[deg]54'45''
W to 43[deg]03'09'' N, 078[deg]55'21'' W to 43[deg]03'00'' N,
078[deg]53'42'' W to 43[deg]02'42'' N, 078[deg]54'09'' W. All
Geographic coordinates are North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83).
(b) Effective Period. This regulation is effective from 11 a.m.
August 29, 2009 to 6 p.m. August 30, 2009. This zone will be enforced
from 11 a.m. to 6 p.m. on August 29, 2009 and August 30, 2009.
(c) Regulations. The general regulations contained in 33 CFR 165.23
apply.
(1) All persons and vessels must comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated on scene patrol
personnel. Coast Guard patrol personnel include commissioned, warrant,
and petty officers of the U.S. Coast Guard. Upon being hailed by a U.S.
Coast Guard vessel via siren, radio, flashing light, or other means,
the operator shall proceed as directed.
(2) Commercial vessels may request permission from the Captain of
the Port Buffalo to transit the safety zone. Approval will be made on a
case-by-case basis. Requests must be made in advance and approved by
the Captain of the Port before transits will be authorized. The Captain
of the Port may be contacted via U.S. Coast Guard Sector Buffalo on
Channel 16, VHF-FM.
Dated: May 29, 2009.
R.S. Burchell,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Buffalo.
[FR Doc. E9-14382 Filed 6-18-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P