Office of Research and Development; Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and Equivalent Methods: Designation of Four New Equivalent Methods, 28696-28698 [E9-14231]
Download as PDF
28696
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 17, 2009 / Notices
What Feedback Is EPA Particularly
Interested in?
Pursuant to section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
the PRA, EPA specifically solicits
comments and information to enable it
to:
(i) Evaluate whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the Agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility;
(ii) Evaluate the accuracy of the
Agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information;
(iii) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected;
(iv) Minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond
What Should I Consider When I
Prepare My Comments for EPA?
You may find the following
suggestions helpful for preparing your
comments:
1. Explain your views as clearly as
possible and provide specific examples.
2. Describe any assumptions you
used.
3. Provide copies of any technical
information and/or data you used that
support your views.
4. If you estimate potential burden or
costs, explain how you arrived at the
estimate you provide.
5. Offer alternative ways to improve
the collection activity.
6. Make sure to submit your
comments by the deadline identified
under DATES.
7. To ensure proper receipt by EPA,
be sure to identify the docket ID number
assigned to this action in the subject
line on the first page of your response.
You may also provide the name, date,
and Federal Register citation.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
What Information Collection Activity or
ICR Does This Apply to?
Affected entities: Entities potentially
affected by this action are municipal
water utility managers and members of
the public participating in focus groups.
Title: Critical Public Information
Needs during Drinking Water
Emergencies (New)
ICR numbers: EPA ICR No. 2322.01,
OMB Control No. 2080–NEW.
ICR status: This ICR is for a new
information collection activity. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information, unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The OMB control numbers for
EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:33 Jun 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
after appearing in the Federal Register
when approved, are listed in 40 CFR
part 9, are displayed either by
publication in the Federal Register or
by other appropriate means, such as on
the related collection instrument or
form, if applicable. The display of OMB
control numbers in certain EPA
regulations is consolidated in 40 CFR
part 9.
Abstract: EPA is collecting this
information as part of a formative
research study to identify critical
information the public will need from
water utilities and other decisionmakers during a crisis event impacting
drinking water. The research will probe
consumers’ and water sector
professionals’ beliefs, opinions, and
knowledge about water security risks to
assist public officials in planning
effective crisis communication strategies
for such emergencies. Good
communication can rally support, calm
fears, provide needed instructions, and
encourage cooperative behaviors.
Study participants will also provide
feedback on the effectiveness of draft
sample messages previously developed
by EPA in consultation with subject
matter experts from water utilities,
public health, emergency response, law
enforcement, and water trade/
professional organizations. Voluntary
participants for this one-time study will
include water utility managers, public
information officers, and members of
the public who consume drinking water
supplied by water utilities.
Confidentiality of responses from
respondents will be assured by using an
independent contractor to collect the
information, enacting procedures to
prevent unauthorized access to
respondent data, and preventing public
disclosure of the responses of individual
participants.
Burden Statement: The annual public
reporting and recordkeeping burden for
this collection of information is
estimated to average 1.7 hours per
response. Burden is defined as the total
time, effort, or financial resources
expended by persons to generate,
maintain, retain, or disclose or provide
information to or for a Federal agency.
This includes the time needed to:
Review instructions; develop, acquire,
install, and utilize technology and
systems for the purposes of collecting,
validating, and verifying information,
processing and maintaining
information, and disclosing and
providing information; adjust the
existing ways to comply with any
previously applicable instructions and
requirements which have subsequently
changed; train personnel to be able to
respond to a collection of information;
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
search data sources; complete and
review the collection of information;
and transmit or otherwise disclose the
information.
The ICR provides a detailed
explanation of the Agency’s estimate,
which is only briefly summarized here:
Estimated total number of potential
respondents: 52 water utility
professional staff and 128 members of
the public participating in focus group
discussions.
Frequency of response: Once.
Estimated total average number of
burden hours for each respondent: 1
hour for water utility professional staff
and 2 hours for members of the public
participating in focus group discussions.
Estimated total annual respondent
burden hours: 308 hours.
Estimated total annual costs:
$1,380.46. This includes an estimated
burden cost of $1,380.46 for
participating water utility professional
staff and $0 for members of the public
participating in focus group discussions
and an estimated cost of $0 for capital
investment or maintenance and
operational costs.
What Is the Next Step in the Process for
This ICR?
EPA will consider the comments
received and amend the ICR as
appropriate. The final ICR package will
then be submitted to OMB for review
and approval pursuant to 5 CFR
1320.12. At that time, EPA will issue
another Federal Register notice
pursuant to 5 CFR 1320.5(a)(1)(iv) to
announce the submission of the ICR to
OMB and the opportunity to submit
additional comments to OMB. If you
have any questions about this ICR or the
approval process, please contact the
technical person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
Dated: May 29, 2009.
Cynthia Sonich-Mullin,
Acting Director, National Homeland Security
Research Center, Office of Research and
Development.
[FR Doc. E9–14239 Filed 6–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FRL–8914–7]
Office of Research and Development;
Ambient Air Monitoring Reference and
Equivalent Methods: Designation of
Four New Equivalent Methods
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency.
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 17, 2009 / Notices
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
ACTION: Notice of the designation of four
new equivalent methods for monitoring
ambient air quality.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) has designated, in accordance
with 40 CFR Part 53, four new
equivalent methods for measuring
concentrations of PM2.5 in the ambient
air.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Surender Kaushik, Human Exposure
and Atmospheric Sciences Division
(MD–D205–03), National Exposure
Research Laboratory, U.S. EPA,
Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
27711. Phone: (919) 541–5691, e-mail:
Kaushik.Surender@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
accordance with regulations at 40 CFR
Part 53, the EPA evaluates various
methods for monitoring the
concentrations of those ambient air
pollutants for which EPA has
established National Ambient Air
Quality Standards (NAAQSs) as set
forth in 40 CFR Part 50. Monitoring
methods that are determined to meet
specific requirements for adequacy are
designated by the EPA as either
reference methods or equivalent
methods (as applicable), thereby
permitting their use under 40 CFR Part
58 by States and other agencies for
determining compliance with the
NAAQSs.
The EPA hereby announces the
designation of four new equivalent
methods for measuring concentrations
of PM2.5 in the ambient air. These
designations are made under the
provisions of 40 CFR Part 53, as
amended on October 17, 2006 (71 FR
61271).
Two of the new equivalent methods
for PM2.5 are automated methods
(analyzers) utilizing the measurement
principle based on filter sample
collection and analysis by an inertial
micro-balance that provides direct mass
measurements in near real time.
Separation of the PM2.5 particle size
range is by a cyclone in the first method
and by a virtual impactor in the second
method. These two newly designated
equivalent methods are identified as
follows:
EQPM–0609–181, ‘‘Thermo Scientific
TEOM® 1400a Ambient Particular
Monitor with Series 8500C FDMSTM,’’
configured for PM2.5 with the US EPA
PM10 inlet specified in 40 CFR Part
50, Appendix L, Figs. L–2 thru L–19,
followed by a BGI Inc. Very Sharp Cut
Cyclone (VSCCTM) particle size
separator, operated with a total actual
flow of 16.67/min., loaded with Series
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:33 Jun 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
FDMS (Filter Dynamics Measurement
System) 8500 module operating
software and an FDMS kit, and
operated with firmware version 3.20
and later, according to the Thermo
Scientific TEOM® 1400a Ambient
Particular Monitor with Series 8500C
FDMSTM operating manual.
EQPM–0609–182, ‘‘Thermo Scientific
TEOM® 1405–DF Dichotomous
Ambient Particular Monitor with
FDMS®,’’ configured for dual filter
sampling of fine (PM2.5) and coarse
particles using the US EPA PM10 inlet
specified in 40 CFR Part 50, Appendix
L, Figs. L–2 thru L–19 and a virtual
impactor, with a total flow rate of
16.67 L/min, fine sample flow of 3 L/
min, and coarse sample flow rate of
1.67 L/min, and operating with
firmware version 1.50 and later,
operated with or without external
enclosures, and operated in
accordance with the Thermo
Scientific TEOM® 1405–DF
Dichotomous Ambient Particulate
Monitor Instruction Manual
(designated for PM2.5 measurements
only).
The other two new equivalent
methods for PM2.5 are automated
methods (analyzers) utilizing the
measurement principle based on
cyclonic separation of the PM2.5 particle
size range with filter sample collection
and analysis by beta attenuation. The
newly designated equivalent methods
are identified as follows:
EQPM–0609–183, ‘‘Thermo Scientific
FH62C14–DHS Continuous Ambient
Particle Monitor’’ operated at a flow
rate of 16.67 liters per minute for 24hour average measurements
configured for PM2.5 with a louvered
PM10 size selective inlet as specified
in 40 CFR Part 50, Appendix L, Figs.
L–2 through L–19, a PM2.5 BGI Inc.
Very Sharp Cut Cyclone (VSCCTM)
particle size separator, inlet
connector, sample tube, DHS heater
with 35% RH threshold, mass foil kit,
GF10 filter tape, 8-hour filter change,
and operational calibration and
servicing as outlined in the FH62C14–
DHS Continuous Ambient Particulate
Monitor operating manual.
EQPM–0609–184, ‘‘Thermo Scientific
Model 5030 SHARP Monitor’’
operated at a flow rate of 16.67 liters
per minute for 24-hour average
measurements configured for PM2.5
with a louvered PM10 size selective
inlet as specified in 40 CFR Part 50,
Appendix L, Figs. L–2 through L–19,
a PM2.5 BGI Inc. Very Sharp Cut
Cyclone (VSCCTM) particle size
separator, inlet connector, sample
tube, DHS heater with 35% RH
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
28697
threshold, mass foil kit, GF10 filter
tape, nephelometer zeroing kit, 8-hour
filter change, and operational
calibration and servicing as outlined
in the Model 5030 SHARP
instructional manual.
Applications for equivalent method
determinations for these candidate
methods were received by the EPA on
June 30, 2008 and July 14, 2008. The
monitors are commercially available
from the applicant, Thermo Fisher
Scientific, Air Quality Instruments,
Environmental Instruments Division, 27
Forge Parkway, Franklin, MA 02038.
Test analyzers representative of these
methods have been tested in accordance
with the applicable test procedures
specified in 40 CFR Part 53 (as amended
on October 17, 2006). After reviewing
the results of those tests and other
information submitted by the applicant
in the respective applications, EPA has
determined, in accordance with Part 53,
that these methods should be designated
as equivalent methods. The information
submitted by the applicant in the
respective applications will be kept on
file, either at EPA’s National Exposure
Research Laboratory, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711 or in an
approved archive storage facility, and
will be available for inspection (with
advance notice) to the extent consistent
with 40 CFR Part 2 (EPA’s regulations
implementing the Freedom of
Information Act).
As designated equivalent methods,
these methods are acceptable for use by
states and other air monitoring agencies
under the requirements of 40 CFR Part
58, Ambient Air Quality Surveillance.
For such purposes, each method must
be used in strict accordance with the
operation or instruction manual
associated with the method and subject
to any specifications and limitations
(e.g., configuration or operational
settings) specified in the applicable
designated method description (see the
identifications of the methods above).
Use of the method should also be in
general accordance with the guidance
and recommendations of applicable
sections of the ‘‘Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume I,’’ EPA/
600/R–94/038a and ‘‘Quality Assurance
Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume II,
Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Program’’ EPA–454/B–08–003,
December, 2008 (available at https://
www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/qabook.html).
Vendor modifications of a designated
equivalent method used for purposes of
Part 58 are permitted only with prior
approval of the EPA, as provided in Part
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
28698
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 17, 2009 / Notices
53. Provisions concerning modification
of such methods by users are specified
under Section 2.8 (Modifications of
Methods by Users) of Appendix C to 40
CFR Part 58.
In general, a method designation
applies to any sampler or analyzer
which is identical to the sampler or
analyzer described in the application for
designation. In some cases, similar
samplers or analyzers manufactured
prior to the designation may be
upgraded or converted (e.g., by minor
modification or by substitution of the
approved operation or instruction
manual) so as to be identical to the
designated method and thus achieve
designated status. The manufacturer
should be consulted to determine the
feasibility of such upgrading or
conversion.
Part 53 requires that sellers of
designated reference or equivalent
method analyzers or samplers comply
with certain conditions. These
conditions are specified in 40 CFR 53.9.
Aside from occasional breakdowns or
malfunctions, consistent or repeated
noncompliance with any of these
conditions should be reported to:
Director, Human Exposure and
Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD–
E205–01), National Exposure Research
Laboratory, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle
Park, North Carolina 27711.
Designation of these new equivalent
methods is intended to assist the States
in establishing and operating their air
quality surveillance systems under 40
CFR Part 58. Questions concerning the
commercial availability or technical
aspects of the method should be
directed to the applicant.
Dated: June 1, 2009.
Jewel F. Morris,
Acting Director, National Exposure Research
Laboratory.
[FR Doc. E9–14231 Filed 6–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2009–0186; FRL–8410–7]
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with NOTICES
Clomazone and Fomesafen
Registration Review Draft Ecological
Risk Assessments; Notice of
Availability; Extension of Comment
Period
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice; extension of comment
period.
SUMMARY: EPA issued a notice in the
Federal Register of April 22, 2009,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:33 Jun 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
concerning the availability of EPA’s
draft ecological risk assessments for the
registration review of both clomazone
and fomesafen and opened a public
comment period on these documents.
This document extends the comment
period for 60 days, from June 22, 2009
to August 21, 2009.
DATES: Comments, identified by docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2009–0186 (74 FR 18374), must be
received on or before August 21, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Follow the detailed
instructions as provided under
ADDRESSES in the Federal Register
document of April 22, 2009 (74 FR
18374).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
pesticide specific information, contact:
The chemical review manager identified
in the Federal Register document of
April 22, 2009 for the pesticide of
interest.
For general questions on the
registration review program, contact:
Kevin Costello, Special Review and
Reregistration Division (7508P), Office
of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001; telephone number: (703) 305–
5026; e-mail address:
costello.kevin@epa.gov.
For general questions on OPP’s
Endangered Species Protection Program
contact: Arty Williams, Environmental
Fate and Effects Division (7508P), Office
of Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–
0001; telephone number (703) 305–
7695; fax number (703) 308–4776; email address: williams.arty@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
document extends the public comment
period established in the Federal
Register of April 22, 2009, 74 FR 18374
(FRL–8410–7). In that document, EPA
announced the availability of the draft
ecological risk assessments for the
registration review of both clomazone
and fomesafen and opened a public
comment period on these documents.
EPA is hereby extending the comment
period, which was set to end on June 22,
2009, to August 21, 2009.
To submit comments, or access the
public docket, please follow the detailed
instructions as provided under
ADDRESSES in the April 22, 2009 Federal
Register document. If you have
questions, consult the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
List of Subjects
Environmental protection,
Registration Review, Pesticide pests.
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Dated: June 10, 2009.
Richard P. Keigwin, Jr.,
Director, Special Review and Reregistration
Division, Office of Pesticide Programs.
[FR Doc. E9–14227 Filed 6–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–S
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–1145; FRL–8916–4]
Draft Risk and Exposure Assessment
Report for Review of the Secondary
National Ambient Air Quality
Standards for Oxides of Nitrogen and
Oxides of Sulfur
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of draft report for public
review and comment.
SUMMARY: On or about June 5, 2009, the
Office of Air Quality Planning and
Standards (OAQPS) of EPA is making
available for public review and
comment a draft document titled ‘‘Risk
and Exposure Assessment to Support
the Review of the Secondary National
Ambient Air Quality Standards for
Oxides of Nitrogen and Oxides of
Sulfur: Second Draft.’’ The purpose of
this draft document is to convey the
approach taken to assess environmental
exposures to ambient oxides of nitrogen
and sulfur and to characterize
associated public welfare risks, as well
as to present the results of those
assessments.
DATES: Comments on the above report
must be received on or before July 17,
2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–HQ–
OAR–2007–1145, by one of the
following methods:
• www.regulations.gov: Follow the
on-line instructions for submitting
comments.
• E-mail: Comments may be sent by
electronic mail (e-mail) to a-and-rdocket@epa.gov, Attention Docket ID
No. EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–1145.
• Fax: Fax your comments to 202–
566–9744, Attention Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–1145.
• Mail: Send your comments to: Air
and Radiation Docket and Information
Center, Environmental Protection
Agency, Mailcode: 2822T, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460, Attention Docket ID No.
EPA–HQ–OAR–2007–1145.
• Hand Delivery or Courier: Deliver
your comments to: EPA Docket Center,
1301 Constitution Ave., NW., Room
3334, Washington, DC. Such deliveries
E:\FR\FM\17JNN1.SGM
17JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 17, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28696-28698]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14231]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[FRL-8914-7]
Office of Research and Development; Ambient Air Monitoring
Reference and Equivalent Methods: Designation of Four New Equivalent
Methods
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency.
[[Page 28697]]
ACTION: Notice of the designation of four new equivalent methods for
monitoring ambient air quality.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) has designated, in accordance with 40 CFR Part 53, four
new equivalent methods for measuring concentrations of PM2.5
in the ambient air.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Surender Kaushik, Human Exposure and
Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD-D205-03), National Exposure Research
Laboratory, U.S. EPA, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.
Phone: (919) 541-5691, e-mail: Kaushik.Surender@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with regulations at 40 CFR
Part 53, the EPA evaluates various methods for monitoring the
concentrations of those ambient air pollutants for which EPA has
established National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQSs) as set
forth in 40 CFR Part 50. Monitoring methods that are determined to meet
specific requirements for adequacy are designated by the EPA as either
reference methods or equivalent methods (as applicable), thereby
permitting their use under 40 CFR Part 58 by States and other agencies
for determining compliance with the NAAQSs.
The EPA hereby announces the designation of four new equivalent
methods for measuring concentrations of PM2.5 in the ambient
air. These designations are made under the provisions of 40 CFR Part
53, as amended on October 17, 2006 (71 FR 61271).
Two of the new equivalent methods for PM2.5 are
automated methods (analyzers) utilizing the measurement principle based
on filter sample collection and analysis by an inertial micro-balance
that provides direct mass measurements in near real time. Separation of
the PM2.5 particle size range is by a cyclone in the first
method and by a virtual impactor in the second method. These two newly
designated equivalent methods are identified as follows:
EQPM-0609-181, ``Thermo Scientific TEOM[supreg] 1400a Ambient
Particular Monitor with Series 8500C FDMS\TM\,'' configured for
PM2.5 with the US EPA PM10 inlet specified in 40
CFR Part 50, Appendix L, Figs. L-2 thru L-19, followed by a BGI Inc.
Very Sharp Cut Cyclone (VSCC\TM\) particle size separator, operated
with a total actual flow of 16.67/min., loaded with Series FDMS (Filter
Dynamics Measurement System) 8500 module operating software and an FDMS
kit, and operated with firmware version 3.20 and later, according to
the Thermo Scientific TEOM[supreg] 1400a Ambient Particular Monitor
with Series 8500C FDMS\TM\ operating manual.
EQPM-0609-182, ``Thermo Scientific TEOM[supreg] 1405-DF Dichotomous
Ambient Particular Monitor with FDMS[supreg],'' configured for dual
filter sampling of fine (PM2.5) and coarse particles using
the US EPA PM10 inlet specified in 40 CFR Part 50, Appendix
L, Figs. L-2 thru L-19 and a virtual impactor, with a total flow rate
of 16.67 L/min, fine sample flow of 3 L/min, and coarse sample flow
rate of 1.67 L/min, and operating with firmware version 1.50 and later,
operated with or without external enclosures, and operated in
accordance with the Thermo Scientific TEOM[supreg] 1405-DF Dichotomous
Ambient Particulate Monitor Instruction Manual (designated for
PM2.5 measurements only).
The other two new equivalent methods for PM2.5 are
automated methods (analyzers) utilizing the measurement principle based
on cyclonic separation of the PM2.5 particle size range with
filter sample collection and analysis by beta attenuation. The newly
designated equivalent methods are identified as follows:
EQPM-0609-183, ``Thermo Scientific FH62C14-DHS Continuous Ambient
Particle Monitor'' operated at a flow rate of 16.67 liters per minute
for 24-hour average measurements configured for PM2.5 with a
louvered PM10 size selective inlet as specified in 40 CFR
Part 50, Appendix L, Figs. L-2 through L-19, a PM2.5 BGI
Inc. Very Sharp Cut Cyclone (VSCC\TM\) particle size separator, inlet
connector, sample tube, DHS heater with 35% RH threshold, mass foil
kit, GF10 filter tape, 8-hour filter change, and operational
calibration and servicing as outlined in the FH62C14-DHS Continuous
Ambient Particulate Monitor operating manual.
EQPM-0609-184, ``Thermo Scientific Model 5030 SHARP Monitor'' operated
at a flow rate of 16.67 liters per minute for 24-hour average
measurements configured for PM2.5 with a louvered
PM10 size selective inlet as specified in 40 CFR Part 50,
Appendix L, Figs. L-2 through L-19, a PM2.5 BGI Inc. Very
Sharp Cut Cyclone (VSCC\TM\) particle size separator, inlet connector,
sample tube, DHS heater with 35% RH threshold, mass foil kit, GF10
filter tape, nephelometer zeroing kit, 8-hour filter change, and
operational calibration and servicing as outlined in the Model 5030
SHARP instructional manual.
Applications for equivalent method determinations for these
candidate methods were received by the EPA on June 30, 2008 and July
14, 2008. The monitors are commercially available from the applicant,
Thermo Fisher Scientific, Air Quality Instruments, Environmental
Instruments Division, 27 Forge Parkway, Franklin, MA 02038.
Test analyzers representative of these methods have been tested in
accordance with the applicable test procedures specified in 40 CFR Part
53 (as amended on October 17, 2006). After reviewing the results of
those tests and other information submitted by the applicant in the
respective applications, EPA has determined, in accordance with Part
53, that these methods should be designated as equivalent methods. The
information submitted by the applicant in the respective applications
will be kept on file, either at EPA's National Exposure Research
Laboratory, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 or in an
approved archive storage facility, and will be available for inspection
(with advance notice) to the extent consistent with 40 CFR Part 2
(EPA's regulations implementing the Freedom of Information Act).
As designated equivalent methods, these methods are acceptable for
use by states and other air monitoring agencies under the requirements
of 40 CFR Part 58, Ambient Air Quality Surveillance. For such purposes,
each method must be used in strict accordance with the operation or
instruction manual associated with the method and subject to any
specifications and limitations (e.g., configuration or operational
settings) specified in the applicable designated method description
(see the identifications of the methods above).
Use of the method should also be in general accordance with the
guidance and recommendations of applicable sections of the ``Quality
Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution Measurement Systems, Volume I,''
EPA/600/R-94/038a and ``Quality Assurance Handbook for Air Pollution
Measurement Systems, Volume II, Ambient Air Quality Monitoring
Program'' EPA-454/B-08-003, December, 2008 (available at https://www.epa.gov/ttn/amtic/qabook.html). Vendor modifications of a
designated equivalent method used for purposes of Part 58 are permitted
only with prior approval of the EPA, as provided in Part
[[Page 28698]]
53. Provisions concerning modification of such methods by users are
specified under Section 2.8 (Modifications of Methods by Users) of
Appendix C to 40 CFR Part 58.
In general, a method designation applies to any sampler or analyzer
which is identical to the sampler or analyzer described in the
application for designation. In some cases, similar samplers or
analyzers manufactured prior to the designation may be upgraded or
converted (e.g., by minor modification or by substitution of the
approved operation or instruction manual) so as to be identical to the
designated method and thus achieve designated status. The manufacturer
should be consulted to determine the feasibility of such upgrading or
conversion.
Part 53 requires that sellers of designated reference or equivalent
method analyzers or samplers comply with certain conditions. These
conditions are specified in 40 CFR 53.9.
Aside from occasional breakdowns or malfunctions, consistent or
repeated noncompliance with any of these conditions should be reported
to: Director, Human Exposure and Atmospheric Sciences Division (MD-
E205-01), National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711.
Designation of these new equivalent methods is intended to assist
the States in establishing and operating their air quality surveillance
systems under 40 CFR Part 58. Questions concerning the commercial
availability or technical aspects of the method should be directed to
the applicant.
Dated: June 1, 2009.
Jewel F. Morris,
Acting Director, National Exposure Research Laboratory.
[FR Doc. E9-14231 Filed 6-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P