Safety Zone; Ohio River, Mile 460.0 to 470.5, Cincinnati, OH, 28614-28616 [E9-14166]
Download as PDF
28614
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, state, and federal law
enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the
Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of San Diego or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to
transit through the safety zone may
request authorization to do so from the
Sector San Diego Command Center. The
Command Center may be contacted on
VHF–FM Channel 16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the
designated representative. Upon being
hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol
personnel by siren, radio, flashing light,
or other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed.
(4) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
Dated: June 2, 2009.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. E9–14163 Filed 6–16–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0310]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Ohio River, Mile 460.0 to
470.5, Cincinnati, OH
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone for
all waters of the Ohio River, beginning
at mile marker 460.0 and ending at
470.5. This zone is necessary to protect
participants, spectators, and vessels
from the potential safety hazards
associated with the 8th Annual Ohio
River Way Paddlefest marine event.
Entry into this zone is prohibited unless
specifically authorized by the Captain of
the Port Ohio Valley or other designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m.
to 12:30 p.m. on June 27, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Jun 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
docket are part of docket USCG–2009–
0310 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, selecting
the Advanced Docket Search option on
the right side of the screen, inserting
USCG–2009–0310 in the Docket ID box,
pressing Enter, and then clicking on the
item in the Docket ID column. They are
also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M–
30), U.S. Department of Transportation,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Saturday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Chief Petty Officer
Don Laisure, Prevention Department,
Sector Ohio Valley, U.S. Coast Guard;
telephone 502–893–8186, e-mail
Donald.L.Laisure@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V.
Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing
so and delaying its effective date would
be contrary to public interest since
immediate action is needed to protect
persons and vessels from the hazards
associated with the 8th Annual Ohio
River Way Paddlefest marine event.
For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C.
553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for making this rule
effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The 8th Annual Ohio River Way
Paddlefest Marine Event consists of
kayak and canoe races on June 27, 2009.
A safety zone encompassing the entire
marine event area is required to ensure
the safety of participants, spectators and
vessels in the area.
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone from 8 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on
Saturday, June 27, 2009 for the 8th
Annual Ohio River Way Paddlefest
marine event. This temporary safety
zone is necessary for the safety of the
participants, spectators and vessels, and
will impact the use of the waterway
during the period of the event. The
limits of this temporary safety zone
encompass all waters of the Ohio River
between Ohio River Mile 460.0 and
470.5.
The Coast Guard will enforce the
safety zone and may be assisted by other
Federal, State and local agencies,
including the Coast Guard Auxiliary.
Persons and vessels will be prohibited
from entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or
other designated representative.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order. We expect the economic impact
of this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the size,
location, and duration of the safety
zone.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
E:\FR\FM\17JNR1.SGM
17JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
or anchor between Ohio River Mile
460.0 and 470.5 from 8 a.m. to 12:30
p.m. on June 27, 2009.
This safety zone would not have a
significant impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons. This safety zone
would be activated, and thus subject to
enforcement, for only 4 hours and 30
minutes. Before activation of the zone,
we would issue maritime advisories
widely available to users of the river.
Consideration will be given to vessels
desiring transit through the safety zone
on a case-by-case basis. When safety
permits, vessel transits will be granted
by and under the conditions set forth by
the COTP or designated representative.
Before activation of the zone, we will
issue maritime advisories widely
available to users of the river.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Assistance for Small Entities
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call 1–
888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The
Coast Guard will not retaliate against
small entities that question or complain
about this rule or any policy or action
of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Federalism
A rule has implications for
Federalism under Executive Order
13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial
direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt
State law or impose a substantial direct
cost of compliance on them. We have
analyzed this rule under that Order and
have determined that it does not have
implications for Federalism.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Jun 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children From Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
28615
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023.1 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves implementation of regulations
within 33 CFR Part 165 that apply to
safety zones on the navigable waters of
the United States. An environmental
analysis checklist and a categorical
exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5;
E:\FR\FM\17JNR1.SGM
17JNR1
28616
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 115 / Wednesday, June 17, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1
2. Add temporary § 165.T08–0310 to
read as follows:
■
165.T08–0310 Safety Zone; Ohio River,
Miles 460.0 to 470.5, Cincinnati, OH.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of the Ohio
River, from surface to bottom, beginning
at mile marker 460.0 and ending at mile
marker 470.5.
(b) Effective Period. This section is
effective from 8 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on
June 27, 2009.
(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance
with the general regulations in § 165.23
of this part, entry into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a
designated representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry
into or passage through the zone must
request permission from the Captain of
the Port Ohio Valley or a designated
representative. U.S. Coast Guard Sector
Ohio Valley may be contacted on VHF
Channel 13 or 16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Captain of the Port Ohio Valley and
designated U.S. Coast Guard patrol
personnel. On-scene U.S. Coast Guard
patrol personnel include commissioned,
warrant, and Petty Officers of the U.S.
Coast Guard.
Dated: May 5, 2009.
A.E. Tucci,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of
the Port Ohio Valley, Acting.
[FR Doc. E9–14166 Filed 6–16–09; 8:45 am]
2007. In the direct final rule, EPA stated
that if adverse comments were
submitted by June 4, 2009, the rule
would be withdrawn and not take effect.
On May 19, 2009, EPA received a
comment. EPA believes this comment is
adverse and, therefore, EPA is
withdrawing the direct final rule. EPA
will address the comment in a
subsequent final action based upon the
proposed action also published on May
5, 2009 (74 FR 20665). EPA will not
institute a second comment period on
this action.
DATES: The direct final rule published at
74 FR 20599 on May 5, 2009, is
withdrawn as of June 17, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sam
Portanova, Environmental Engineer, Air
Permits Section, Air Programs Branch
(AR–18J), USEPA, Region 5, 77 West
Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois
60604, (312) 886–3189,
portanova.sam@epa.gov.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Lead,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate
matter, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: June 4, 2009.
Walter W. Kovalick Jr.,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
PART 52—[AMENDED]
Accordingly, the amendment to 40
CFR 52.770 published in the Federal
Register on May 5, 2009 (74 FR 20599)
on page 20601 is withdrawn as of June
17, 2009.
■
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[FR Doc. E9–14240 Filed 6–16–09; 8:45 am]
40 CFR Part 52
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
[R05–OAR–2008–0031; FRL–8919–7]
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana;
Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.
AGENCY:
Due to the receipt of an
adverse comment, the EPA is
withdrawing the May 5, 2009 (74 FR
20599), direct final rule approving a rule
revision to extend Federally Enforceable
State Operating Permit renewal terms
from five years to ten years. The State
of Indiana submitted this revision as a
modification to the State
Implementation Plan on December 19,
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:23 Jun 16, 2009
Jkt 217001
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 180
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0738; FRL–8418–6]
Alkyl Amine Polyalkoxylates;
Exemption from the Requirement of a
Tolerance
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes an
exemption from the requirement of a
tolerance for residues of alkyl amine
polyalkoxylates when used as inert
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ingredients in pesticide formulations
applied to growing crops and animals.
The Joint Inerts Task Force (JITF),
Cluster Support Team Number 4
submitted a petition to EPA under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA), requesting an exemption from
the requirement of a tolerance. This
regulation eliminates the need to
establish a maximum permissible level
for residues of alkyl amine
polyalkoxylates.
DATES: This regulation is effective June
17, 2009. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
August 17, 2009, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2008–0738. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
Facility telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kerry Leifer, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 308–8811; e-mail address:
leifer.kerry@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. General Information
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to those engaged in the
following activities:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
E:\FR\FM\17JNR1.SGM
17JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 115 (Wednesday, June 17, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28614-28616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14166]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2009-0310]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Ohio River, Mile 460.0 to 470.5, Cincinnati, OH
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone for
all waters of the Ohio River, beginning at mile marker 460.0 and ending
at 470.5. This zone is necessary to protect participants, spectators,
and vessels from the potential safety hazards associated with the 8th
Annual Ohio River Way Paddlefest marine event. Entry into this zone is
prohibited unless specifically authorized by the Captain of the Port
Ohio Valley or other designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. on June 27,
2009.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2009-0310 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, selecting the Advanced Docket
Search option on the right side of the screen, inserting USCG-2009-0310
in the Docket ID box, pressing Enter, and then clicking on the item in
the Docket ID column. They are also available for inspection or copying
at the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Saturday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Chief Petty Officer Don Laisure, Prevention
Department, Sector Ohio Valley, U.S. Coast Guard; telephone 502-893-
8186, e-mail Donald.L.Laisure@uscg.mil. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright,
Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because doing so and delaying its effective
date would be contrary to public interest since immediate action is
needed to protect persons and vessels from the hazards associated with
the 8th Annual Ohio River Way Paddlefest marine event.
For the same reasons, under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard
finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than
30 days after publication in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The 8th Annual Ohio River Way Paddlefest Marine Event consists of
kayak and canoe races on June 27, 2009. A safety zone encompassing the
entire marine event area is required to ensure the safety of
participants, spectators and vessels in the area.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone from 8 a.m. to 12:30
p.m. on Saturday, June 27, 2009 for the 8th Annual Ohio River Way
Paddlefest marine event. This temporary safety zone is necessary for
the safety of the participants, spectators and vessels, and will impact
the use of the waterway during the period of the event. The limits of
this temporary safety zone encompass all waters of the Ohio River
between Ohio River Mile 460.0 and 470.5.
The Coast Guard will enforce the safety zone and may be assisted by
other Federal, State and local agencies, including the Coast Guard
Auxiliary. Persons and vessels will be prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or other designated
representative.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. We expect the economic impact of this
rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the size, location, and duration of the
safety zone.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some
of which might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit
[[Page 28615]]
or anchor between Ohio River Mile 460.0 and 470.5 from 8 a.m. to 12:30
p.m. on June 27, 2009.
This safety zone would not have a significant impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
safety zone would be activated, and thus subject to enforcement, for
only 4 hours and 30 minutes. Before activation of the zone, we would
issue maritime advisories widely available to users of the river.
Consideration will be given to vessels desiring transit through the
safety zone on a case-by-case basis. When safety permits, vessel
transits will be granted by and under the conditions set forth by the
COTP or designated representative. Before activation of the zone, we
will issue maritime advisories widely available to users of the river.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for Federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
Federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children From Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded
this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually
or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment.
This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves implementation of
regulations within 33 CFR Part 165 that apply to safety zones on the
navigable waters of the United States. An environmental analysis
checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are available in
the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR
part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6 and 160.5;
[[Page 28616]]
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1
0
2. Add temporary Sec. 165.T08-0310 to read as follows:
165.T08-0310 Safety Zone; Ohio River, Miles 460.0 to 470.5,
Cincinnati, OH.
(a) Location. The following area is a safety zone: All waters of
the Ohio River, from surface to bottom, beginning at mile marker 460.0
and ending at mile marker 470.5.
(b) Effective Period. This section is effective from 8 a.m. to
12:30 p.m. on June 27, 2009.
(d) Regulations. (1) In accordance with the general regulations in
Sec. 165.23 of this part, entry into this zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley or a designated
representative.
(2) Persons or vessels requiring entry into or passage through the
zone must request permission from the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley
or a designated representative. U.S. Coast Guard Sector Ohio Valley may
be contacted on VHF Channel 13 or 16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Captain of the Port Ohio Valley and designated U.S. Coast Guard
patrol personnel. On-scene U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel include
commissioned, warrant, and Petty Officers of the U.S. Coast Guard.
Dated: May 5, 2009.
A.E. Tucci,
Commander, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port Ohio Valley, Acting.
[FR Doc. E9-14166 Filed 6-16-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P