Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S-92A Helicopters, 28439-28441 [E9-14081]
Download as PDF
28439
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
Vol. 74, No. 114
Tuesday, June 16, 2009
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains regulatory documents having general
applicability and legal effect, most of which
are keyed to and codified in the Code of
Federal Regulations, which is published under
50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by
the Superintendent of Documents. Prices of
new books are listed in the first FEDERAL
REGISTER issue of each week.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0518; Directorate
Identifier 2009–SW–22–AD; Amendment 39–
15940; AD 2009–13–01]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky
Aircraft Corporation Model S–92A
Helicopters
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for
comments.
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes
an existing airworthiness directive (AD)
for Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation
(Sikorsky) Model S–92A helicopters.
That AD currently requires removing all
main gearbox (MGB) filter bowl
assembly mounting titanium studs
(titanium studs) and replacing them
with steel studs. This amendment
requires the same actions as the existing
AD as well as changes to the Rotorcraft
Flight Manual (RFM). This amendment
is prompted by an accident, by recent
RFM changes made by the manufacturer
that were not available when we issued
the existing AD, and by our
determination that certain MGB Normal
and Emergency procedures in the RFM
are unclear, may cause confusion, and
may mislead the crew regarding MGB
malfunctions, in particular the urgency
to land immediately after warning
indications of loss of MGB oil pressure
and oil pressure below 5 pounds per
square inch (psi).
Replacing the titanium studs is
intended to prevent their failure, which
could result in rapid loss of oil, failure
of the MGB, and subsequent loss of
control of the helicopter. Changing the
RFM procedures is intended to clarify
and emphasize certain Normal and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:01 Jun 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
Emergency procedures to give the crew
the best available information in the
event of certain MGB malfunctions.
DATES: Effective July 1, 2009.
The incorporation by reference of
Sikorsky Alert Service Bulletin No. 92–
63–014, Revision A, dated March 20,
2009, was approved previously for
incorporation by reference by the
Director of the Federal Register on April
27, 2009 (74 FR 18977, April 27, 2009).
Comments for inclusion in the Rules
Docket must be received on or before
August 17, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following
addresses to submit comments on this
AD:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information
identified in this AD from Sikorsky
Aircraft Corporation, Attn: Manager,
Commercial Technical Support,
mailstop s581a, 6900 Main Street,
Stratford, CT, telephone (203) 383–4866,
e-mail address tsslibrary@sikorsky.com,
or at https://www.sikorsky.com.
Examining the Docket: You may
examine the docket that contains the
AD, any comments, and other
information on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov, or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The Docket
Operations office (telephone (800) 647–
5527) is located in Room W12–140 on
the ground floor of the West Building at
the street address stated in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John
M. Coffey, Flight Test Engineer, FAA, 12
New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803, telephone (781)
238–7173, fax (781) 238–7170.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
On March
23, 2009, we issued Emergency AD
2009–07–53 for Sikorsky Model S–92A
helicopters, which requires, before
further flight, removing all titanium
studs that attach the MGB filter bowl
assembly to the MGB and replacing
them with steel studs. That action was
prompted by the failure of 2 studs that
were found broken during a fatal
accident investigation in Canada. Before
the accident, the manufacturer was
investigating a July 2008 incident that
also involved broken studs. In both
cases, the broken studs resulted in rapid
loss of MGB oil. The failures have been
tied to fretting and galling of the original
titanium studs. That emergency AD was
published as Amendment 39–15886 on
April 27, 2009 (74 FR 18977). This AD
continues to require removing all
titanium studs and replacing them with
steel studs.
Since the fatal accident and since
issuing AD 2009–07–53, Sikorsky has
issued revisions to the Normal and
Emergency procedures of the RFM. We
have determined that these revisions are
necessary because the existing
procedures are unclear, may cause
confusion, and may mislead the crew
regarding MGB malfunctions, in
particular the urgency to land
immediately after warning indications
of loss of MGB oil pressure and oil
pressure below 5 psi. This action does
not mandate the procedures the pilot
must perform in an emergency, but
requires making changes to the RFM to
clarify and emphasize the Normal and
Emergency procedures addressing
specified MGB malfunctions, thus
giving the pilot the necessary
information to make an informed
decision. We are superseding the
existing AD to include the most recent
RFM revisions because the revisions
were not available when we originally
issued AD 2009–07–53.
We have reviewed Sikorsky Alert
Service Bulletin No. 92–63–014A,
Revision A, dated March 20, 2009
(ASB), which describes procedures for
removing titanium studs and replacing
them with steel suds. We have also
reviewed the RFM revisions and, after
full coordination with Sikorsky,
approved them on May 13, 2009.
Sikorsky has since assured us that they
have provided the revised RFM
procedures to all affected operators. The
RFM revisions are as follows:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
28440
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 16, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
• SA S92A–RFM–000 Revision No. 4,
• SA S92A–RFM–002 Revision No.
10,
• SA S92A–RFM–003 Revision No.
10,
• SA S92A–RFM–004 Revision No. 8,
• SA S92A–RFM–005 Revision No. 7,
• SA S92A–RFM–006 Revision No. 8,
and
• S92A–RFM Supplement No. 3,
Revision No. 2.
In addition to the RFM revisions, we
have also reviewed associated Errata
Sheets, dated June 4, 2009, that provide
corrections to those RFM revisions;
however, we are not mandating that
they be incorporated.
Since an unsafe condition has been
identified that is likely to exist or
develop on other Sikorsky Model S–92A
helicopters of the same type design, this
AD supersedes AD 2009–07–53 to
require, before further flight, removing
all titanium studs and replacing them
with steel studs. These actions must be
accomplished by following the specified
portions of the ASB described
previously. Because the critical unsafe
condition can adversely affect the
structural integrity and controllability of
the helicopter, AD 2009–07–53 remains
in full effect until the effective date of
this AD.
Making the Normal and Emergency
RFM revisions that were not available
when we issued AD 2009–07–53 is
required within 10 hours time-inservice. The short compliance time is
required because certain procedures in
the existing RFM may be misleading,
presenting an unacceptable level of risk,
and because the required RFM revisions
are already approved by the FAA and
available to operators, imposing a
minimal burden. Therefore, it is found
that notice and opportunity for prior
public comment hereon are unnecessary
and contrary to the public interest, and
that good cause also exists for making
this amendment effective in less than 30
days.
We estimate that this AD will affect
35 helicopters of U.S. registry.
Replacing the studs will take
approximately 6 work hours per
helicopter to accomplish at an average
labor rate of $80 per work hour. In
accordance with the ASB, required parts
and tooling are available at no cost.
Making the changes to the RFM will
take a minimal amount of time and cost.
Based on these figures, we estimate the
total cost impact of the AD on U.S.
operators to be $16,800, assuming there
are no parts and tooling costs.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves
requirements that affect flight safety and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:01 Jun 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
was not preceded by notice and an
opportunity for public comment;
however, we invite you to submit any
written data, views, or arguments
regarding this AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under ADDRESSES.
Include ‘‘Docket No. FAA–2009–0518;
Directorate Identifier 2009–SW–22–AD’’
at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the
overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of
the AD. We will consider all comments
received by the closing date and may
amend the AD in light of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this AD. Using the
search function of our docket Web site,
you can find and read the comments to
any of our dockets, including the name
of the individual who sent the
comment. You may review the DOT’s
complete Privacy Act Statement in the
Federal Register published on April 11,
2000 (65 FR 19477–78).
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will
not have federalism implications under
Executive Order 13132. This AD will
not have a substantial direct effect on
the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify that the regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this AD. See the AD docket to examine
the economic evaluation.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
Section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII,
Aviation Programs, describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701,
‘‘General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the Federal Aviation Administration
amends part 39 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
■
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. Section 39.13 is amended by
removing Amendment 39–15886 (74 FR
18977, April 27, 2009), and by adding
a new airworthiness directive (AD),
Amendment 39–15940, to read as
follows:
■
2009–13–01 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation:
Amendment 39–15940. Docket No.
FAA–2009–0518; Directorate Identifier
2009–SW–22–AD. Supersedes AD 2009–
07–53, Amendment 39–15886, Docket
No. FAA–2009–0351, Directorate
Identifier 2009–SW–08–AD.
Applicability: Model S–92A helicopters,
certificated in any category.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless
accomplished previously.
To prevent failure of a main gearbox (MGB)
filter bowl assembly mounting titanium stud
(titanium stud), which could result in rapid
loss of oil, failure of the MGB, and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter;
and to clarify and emphasize certain Normal
and Emergency procedures to give the crew
the best available information in the event of
certain MGB malfunctions, accomplish the
following:
(a) Before further flight, for all Model S–
92A helicopters with a MGB housing
assembly, part number (P/N) 92351–15110–
042, –043, or –044, that is not marked with
‘‘TS–062–01’’ near the P/N:
(1) Remove the titanium studs by following
the Accomplishment Instructions in Sikorsky
Alert Service Bulletin No. 92–63–014, Rev.
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 16, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
A, dated March 20, 2009 (ASB), paragraph
3.A.
Note 1: Figure 1 of the ASB contains
guidance for removal and installation of the
studs
(2) Visually inspect the tapped holes and
the MGB housing lockring counterbore for
RFM
damage. If you find damage in the tapped
holes or in the MGB housing lockring
counterbore, contact the Boston Aircraft
Certification Office for an approved repair.
(3) Install steel studs and mark the MGB
housing as ‘‘TS–062–01’’ near the P/N by
following the Accomplishment Instructions
in the ASB, paragraph 3.C.
28441
(b) Within 10 hours time-in-service, for all
helicopters regardless of MGB housing
assembly P/N:
(1) Revise the Normal and Emergency
procedures sections of the Rotorcraft Flight
Manual (RFM) by making the following
changes, approved May 13, 2009:
Remove
Remove
Insert
SA S92A–RFM–002
Part I.
Temporary Revision (T-Rev) No.
1, Revised Main Gearbox
Emergency Procedure.
T-Rev No. 5, Revised Main Gearbox Emergency Procedure.
SA S92A–RFM–003
Part I.
T-Rev No. 4, Revised Main Gearbox Emergency Procedure.
SA S92A–RFM–004
Part I.
T-Rev No. 4, Revised Main Gearbox Emergency Procedure.
SA S92A–RFM–005
Part I.
T-Rev No. 3, Revised Main Gearbox Emergency Procedure.
SA S92A–RFM–006
Part I.
T-Rev No. 2, Revised Main Gearbox Emergency Procedure.
S92A–RFMS No. 3 ......
N/A ................................................
Page 2–12, and Sub-Section 7
‘‘Gear Box Malfunctions’’ from
Section III.
Page 2–13, and Sub-Section 7
‘‘Gear Box Malfunctions’’ from
Section III.
Page 2–13, and Sub-Section 7
‘‘Gear Box Malfunctions’’ from
Section III.
Page 2–12, and Sub-Section 7
‘‘Gear Box Malfunctions’’ from
Section III.
Page 2–13, and Sub-Section 7
‘‘Gear Box Malfunctions’’ from
Section III.
Page 2–13, and Sub-Section 7
‘‘Gear Box Malfunctions’’ from
Section III.
Sub-Section 7 ‘‘Gear Box Malfunctions’’ from Section III.
Page 2–12, and Sub-Section 7 ‘‘Gear Box
Malfunctions’’ from Section III of SA S92A–
RFM–000, Revision No. 4.
Page 2–13, and Sub-Section 7 ‘‘Gear Box
Malfunctions’’ from Section III of SA S92A–
RFM–002, Revision No. 10.
Page 2–13, and Sub-Section 7 ‘‘Gear Box
Malfunctions’’ from Section III of SA S92A–
RFM–003, Revision No. 10.
Page 2–12, and Sub-Section 7 ‘‘Gear Box
Malfunctions’’ from Section III of SA S92A–
RFM–004, Revision No. 8.
Page 2–13, and Sub-Section 7 ‘‘Gear Box
Malfunctions’’ from Section III of SA S92A–
RFM–005, Revision No. 7.
Page 2–13, and Sub-Section 7 ‘‘Gear Box
Malfunctions’’ from Section III of SA S92A–
RFM–006, Revision No. 8.
Sub-Section 7 ‘‘Gear Box Malfunctions’’ from
Section III of S92A-RFM Supplement No.
3, Revision No. 2.
SA S92A–RFM–000
Part I.
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES
All paragraphs of subsection 7 ‘‘Gear Box Malfunctions’’ starting with paragraph 7.0 are affected.
Note 2: Inserting the following revisions,
approved on May 13, 2009, and their
associated Errata Sheets, dated June 4, 2009,
into the RFM, as applicable, satisfies the
requirements of this AD:
(i) SA S92A–RFM–000 Revision No. 4,
(ii) SA S92A–RFM–002 Revision No. 10,
(iii) SA S92A–RFM–003 Revision No. 10,
(iv) SA S92A–RFM–004 Revision No. 8,
(v) SA S92A–RFM–005 Revision No. 7,
(vi) SA S92A–RFM–006 Revision No. 8,
and
(vii) S92A–RFM Supplement No. 3,
Revision No. 2.
(c) To request a different method of
compliance or a different compliance time
for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR
39.19. Contact the Manager, Boston Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, Attn: John M.
Coffey, FAA, 12 New England Executive
Park, Burlington, MA 01803, telephone (781)
238–7173, fax (781) 238–7170, for
information about previously approved
alternative methods of compliance.
(d) Special flight permits will not be
issued.
(e) Remove and replace the titanium studs
by following the specified portions of
Sikorsky Alert Service Bulletin No. 92–63–
014, Revision A, dated March 20, 2009. The
Director of the Federal Register previously
approved the incorporation by reference of
this information on April 27, 2009 under 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51 (74 FR
18977, April 27, 2009. Copies may be
obtained from Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation,
Attn: Manager, Commercial Technical
Support, mailstop s581a, 6900 Main Street,
Stratford, CT, telephone (203) 383–4866, email address tsslibrary@sikorsky.com or at
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:01 Jun 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
https://www.sikorsky.com. Copies may be
inspected at the FAA, Office of the Regional
Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham
Blvd., Room 663, Fort Worth, Texas, or at the
National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call
202–741–6030, or go to: https://www.archives.
gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_
regulations/ibr_locations.html.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on
July 1, 2009.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 9,
2009.
Mark R. Schilling,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–14081 Filed 6–15–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
23 CFR Parts 192, 470, 625, 634, 650,
655, 772, 971, 972, 973, 1206, 1208,
1210, and 1215
[FHWA Docket No. FHWA–2009–0028]
RIN 2125–AF30
Address Correction
AGENCY: Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
SUMMARY: The FHWA is amending a
number of its regulations to reflect the
move of DOT’s headquarters site in
Washington, DC.
DATES: Effective Date: June 16, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jennifer Outhouse, Office of Chief
Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590; (202) 366–1381.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
publication makes corrections to the
FHWA regulations to update the DOT
headquarters address. Since this
amendment relates to departmental
management, organization, procedure,
and practice, notice and comment are
unnecessary under 5 U.S.C. 553(b).
Further, since the amendment merely
makes technical corrections and
updates, the FHWA finds good cause
under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3) for the final
rule to be effective on the date of
publication in the Federal Register.
Regulatory Analyses and Notices
A. Executive Order 12866 and DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures
This final rule is not considered a
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866 and DOT
regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034). It was not reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget.
There are no costs associated with this
rule.
E:\FR\FM\16JNR1.SGM
16JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 114 (Tuesday, June 16, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 28439-28441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-14081]
========================================================================
Rules and Regulations
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains regulatory documents
having general applicability and legal effect, most of which are keyed
to and codified in the Code of Federal Regulations, which is published
under 50 titles pursuant to 44 U.S.C. 1510.
The Code of Federal Regulations is sold by the Superintendent of Documents.
Prices of new books are listed in the first FEDERAL REGISTER issue of each
week.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 114 / Tuesday, June 16, 2009 / Rules
and Regulations
[[Page 28439]]
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0518; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-22-AD;
Amendment 39-15940; AD 2009-13-01]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation Model S-
92A Helicopters
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration, DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This amendment supersedes an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) for Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation (Sikorsky) Model S-92A
helicopters. That AD currently requires removing all main gearbox (MGB)
filter bowl assembly mounting titanium studs (titanium studs) and
replacing them with steel studs. This amendment requires the same
actions as the existing AD as well as changes to the Rotorcraft Flight
Manual (RFM). This amendment is prompted by an accident, by recent RFM
changes made by the manufacturer that were not available when we issued
the existing AD, and by our determination that certain MGB Normal and
Emergency procedures in the RFM are unclear, may cause confusion, and
may mislead the crew regarding MGB malfunctions, in particular the
urgency to land immediately after warning indications of loss of MGB
oil pressure and oil pressure below 5 pounds per square inch (psi).
Replacing the titanium studs is intended to prevent their failure,
which could result in rapid loss of oil, failure of the MGB, and
subsequent loss of control of the helicopter. Changing the RFM
procedures is intended to clarify and emphasize certain Normal and
Emergency procedures to give the crew the best available information in
the event of certain MGB malfunctions.
DATES: Effective July 1, 2009.
The incorporation by reference of Sikorsky Alert Service Bulletin
No. 92-63-014, Revision A, dated March 20, 2009, was approved
previously for incorporation by reference by the Director of the
Federal Register on April 27, 2009 (74 FR 18977, April 27, 2009).
Comments for inclusion in the Rules Docket must be received on or
before August 17, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Use one of the following addresses to submit comments on
this AD:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 202-493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
You may get the service information identified in this AD from
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, Attn: Manager, Commercial Technical
Support, mailstop s581a, 6900 Main Street, Stratford, CT, telephone
(203) 383-4866, e-mail address tsslibrary@sikorsky.com, or at https://www.sikorsky.com.
Examining the Docket: You may examine the docket that contains the
AD, any comments, and other information on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov, or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
located in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the West Building at the
street address stated in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: John M. Coffey, Flight Test Engineer,
FAA, 12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803, telephone
(781) 238-7173, fax (781) 238-7170.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On March 23, 2009, we issued Emergency AD
2009-07-53 for Sikorsky Model S-92A helicopters, which requires, before
further flight, removing all titanium studs that attach the MGB filter
bowl assembly to the MGB and replacing them with steel studs. That
action was prompted by the failure of 2 studs that were found broken
during a fatal accident investigation in Canada. Before the accident,
the manufacturer was investigating a July 2008 incident that also
involved broken studs. In both cases, the broken studs resulted in
rapid loss of MGB oil. The failures have been tied to fretting and
galling of the original titanium studs. That emergency AD was published
as Amendment 39-15886 on April 27, 2009 (74 FR 18977). This AD
continues to require removing all titanium studs and replacing them
with steel studs.
Since the fatal accident and since issuing AD 2009-07-53, Sikorsky
has issued revisions to the Normal and Emergency procedures of the RFM.
We have determined that these revisions are necessary because the
existing procedures are unclear, may cause confusion, and may mislead
the crew regarding MGB malfunctions, in particular the urgency to land
immediately after warning indications of loss of MGB oil pressure and
oil pressure below 5 psi. This action does not mandate the procedures
the pilot must perform in an emergency, but requires making changes to
the RFM to clarify and emphasize the Normal and Emergency procedures
addressing specified MGB malfunctions, thus giving the pilot the
necessary information to make an informed decision. We are superseding
the existing AD to include the most recent RFM revisions because the
revisions were not available when we originally issued AD 2009-07-53.
We have reviewed Sikorsky Alert Service Bulletin No. 92-63-014A,
Revision A, dated March 20, 2009 (ASB), which describes procedures for
removing titanium studs and replacing them with steel suds. We have
also reviewed the RFM revisions and, after full coordination with
Sikorsky, approved them on May 13, 2009. Sikorsky has since assured us
that they have provided the revised RFM procedures to all affected
operators. The RFM revisions are as follows:
[[Page 28440]]
SA S92A-RFM-000 Revision No. 4,
SA S92A-RFM-002 Revision No. 10,
SA S92A-RFM-003 Revision No. 10,
SA S92A-RFM-004 Revision No. 8,
SA S92A-RFM-005 Revision No. 7,
SA S92A-RFM-006 Revision No. 8, and
S92A-RFM Supplement No. 3, Revision No. 2.
In addition to the RFM revisions, we have also reviewed associated
Errata Sheets, dated June 4, 2009, that provide corrections to those
RFM revisions; however, we are not mandating that they be incorporated.
Since an unsafe condition has been identified that is likely to
exist or develop on other Sikorsky Model S-92A helicopters of the same
type design, this AD supersedes AD 2009-07-53 to require, before
further flight, removing all titanium studs and replacing them with
steel studs. These actions must be accomplished by following the
specified portions of the ASB described previously. Because the
critical unsafe condition can adversely affect the structural integrity
and controllability of the helicopter, AD 2009-07-53 remains in full
effect until the effective date of this AD.
Making the Normal and Emergency RFM revisions that were not
available when we issued AD 2009-07-53 is required within 10 hours
time-in-service. The short compliance time is required because certain
procedures in the existing RFM may be misleading, presenting an
unacceptable level of risk, and because the required RFM revisions are
already approved by the FAA and available to operators, imposing a
minimal burden. Therefore, it is found that notice and opportunity for
prior public comment hereon are unnecessary and contrary to the public
interest, and that good cause also exists for making this amendment
effective in less than 30 days.
We estimate that this AD will affect 35 helicopters of U.S.
registry. Replacing the studs will take approximately 6 work hours per
helicopter to accomplish at an average labor rate of $80 per work hour.
In accordance with the ASB, required parts and tooling are available at
no cost. Making the changes to the RFM will take a minimal amount of
time and cost. Based on these figures, we estimate the total cost
impact of the AD on U.S. operators to be $16,800, assuming there are no
parts and tooling costs.
Comments Invited
This AD is a final rule that involves requirements that affect
flight safety and was not preceded by notice and an opportunity for
public comment; however, we invite you to submit any written data,
views, or arguments regarding this AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under ADDRESSES. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0518; Directorate
Identifier 2009-SW-22-AD'' at the beginning of your comments. We
specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory, economic,
environmental, and energy aspects of the AD. We will consider all
comments received by the closing date and may amend the AD in light of
those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this AD. Using the search function of our
docket Web site, you can find and read the comments to any of our
dockets, including the name of the individual who sent the comment. You
may review the DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
Regulatory Findings
We have determined that this AD will not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This AD will not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship between
the national Government and the States, or on the distribution of power
and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify that the regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared an economic evaluation of the estimated costs to comply
with this AD. See the AD docket to examine the economic evaluation.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, Section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701, ``General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
Adoption of the Amendment
0
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the Federal Aviation Administration amends part 39 of
the Federal Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 39) as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
0
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
0
2. Section 39.13 is amended by removing Amendment 39-15886 (74 FR
18977, April 27, 2009), and by adding a new airworthiness directive
(AD), Amendment 39-15940, to read as follows:
2009-13-01 Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation: Amendment 39-15940. Docket
No. FAA-2009-0518; Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-22-AD. Supersedes
AD 2009-07-53, Amendment 39-15886, Docket No. FAA-2009-0351,
Directorate Identifier 2009-SW-08-AD.
Applicability: Model S-92A helicopters, certificated in any
category.
Compliance: Required as indicated, unless accomplished
previously.
To prevent failure of a main gearbox (MGB) filter bowl assembly
mounting titanium stud (titanium stud), which could result in rapid
loss of oil, failure of the MGB, and subsequent loss of control of
the helicopter; and to clarify and emphasize certain Normal and
Emergency procedures to give the crew the best available information
in the event of certain MGB malfunctions, accomplish the following:
(a) Before further flight, for all Model S-92A helicopters with
a MGB housing assembly, part number (P/N) 92351-15110-042, -043, or
-044, that is not marked with ``TS-062-01'' near the P/N:
(1) Remove the titanium studs by following the Accomplishment
Instructions in Sikorsky Alert Service Bulletin No. 92-63-014, Rev.
[[Page 28441]]
A, dated March 20, 2009 (ASB), paragraph 3.A.
Note 1: Figure 1 of the ASB contains guidance for removal and
installation of the studs
.(2) Visually inspect the tapped holes and the MGB housing
lockring counterbore for damage. If you find damage in the tapped
holes or in the MGB housing lockring counterbore, contact the Boston
Aircraft Certification Office for an approved repair.
(3) Install steel studs and mark the MGB housing as ``TS-062-
01'' near the P/N by following the Accomplishment Instructions in
the ASB, paragraph 3.C.
(b) Within 10 hours time-in-service, for all helicopters
regardless of MGB housing assembly P/N:
(1) Revise the Normal and Emergency procedures sections of the
Rotorcraft Flight Manual (RFM) by making the following changes,
approved May 13, 2009:
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RFM Remove Remove Insert
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SA S92A-RFM-000 Part I............. Temporary Revision (T- Page 2-12, and Sub- Page 2-12, and Sub-Section
Rev) No. 1, Revised Section 7 ``Gear Box 7 ``Gear Box
Main Gearbox Malfunctions'' from Malfunctions'' from
Emergency Procedure. Section III. Section III of SA S92A-RFM-
000, Revision No. 4.
SA S92A-RFM-002 Part I............. T-Rev No. 5, Revised Page 2-13, and Sub- Page 2-13, and Sub-Section
Main Gearbox Section 7 ``Gear Box 7 ``Gear Box
Emergency Procedure. Malfunctions'' from Malfunctions'' from
Section III. Section III of SA S92A-RFM-
002, Revision No. 10.
SA S92A-RFM-003 Part I............. T-Rev No. 4, Revised Page 2-13, and Sub- Page 2-13, and Sub-Section
Main Gearbox Section 7 ``Gear Box 7 ``Gear Box
Emergency Procedure. Malfunctions'' from Malfunctions'' from
Section III. Section III of SA S92A-RFM-
003, Revision No. 10.
SA S92A-RFM-004 Part I............. T-Rev No. 4, Revised Page 2-12, and Sub- Page 2-12, and Sub-Section
Main Gearbox Section 7 ``Gear Box 7 ``Gear Box
Emergency Procedure. Malfunctions'' from Malfunctions'' from
Section III. Section III of SA S92A-RFM-
004, Revision No. 8.
SA S92A-RFM-005 Part I............. T-Rev No. 3, Revised Page 2-13, and Sub- Page 2-13, and Sub-Section
Main Gearbox Section 7 ``Gear Box 7 ``Gear Box
Emergency Procedure. Malfunctions'' from Malfunctions'' from
Section III. Section III of SA S92A-RFM-
005, Revision No. 7.
SA S92A-RFM-006 Part I............. T-Rev No. 2, Revised Page 2-13, and Sub- Page 2-13, and Sub-Section
Main Gearbox Section 7 ``Gear Box 7 ``Gear Box
Emergency Procedure. Malfunctions'' from Malfunctions'' from
Section III. Section III of SA S92A-RFM-
006, Revision No. 8.
S92A-RFMS No. 3.................... N/A................... Sub-Section 7 ``Gear Sub-Section 7 ``Gear Box
Box Malfunctions'' Malfunctions'' from
from Section III. Section III of
S92A[dash]RFM Supplement
No. 3, Revision No. 2.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All paragraphs of subsection 7 ``Gear Box Malfunctions'' starting with paragraph 7.0 are affected.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note 2: Inserting the following revisions, approved on May 13,
2009, and their associated Errata Sheets, dated June 4, 2009, into
the RFM, as applicable, satisfies the requirements of this AD:
(i) SA S92A-RFM-000 Revision No. 4,
(ii) SA S92A-RFM-002 Revision No. 10,
(iii) SA S92A-RFM-003 Revision No. 10,
(iv) SA S92A-RFM-004 Revision No. 8,
(v) SA S92A-RFM-005 Revision No. 7,
(vi) SA S92A-RFM-006 Revision No. 8, and
(vii) S92A-RFM Supplement No. 3, Revision No. 2.
(c) To request a different method of compliance or a different
compliance time for this AD, follow the procedures in 14 CFR 39.19.
Contact the Manager, Boston Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
Attn: John M. Coffey, FAA, 12 New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803, telephone (781) 238-7173, fax (781) 238-7170,
for information about previously approved alternative methods of
compliance.
(d) Special flight permits will not be issued.
(e) Remove and replace the titanium studs by following the
specified portions of Sikorsky Alert Service Bulletin No. 92-63-014,
Revision A, dated March 20, 2009. The Director of the Federal
Register previously approved the incorporation by reference of this
information on April 27, 2009 under 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part
51 (74 FR 18977, April 27, 2009. Copies may be obtained from
Sikorsky Aircraft Corporation, Attn: Manager, Commercial Technical
Support, mailstop s581a, 6900 Main Street, Stratford, CT, telephone
(203) 383-4866, e-mail address tsslibrary@sikorsky.com or at https://www.sikorsky.com. Copies may be inspected at the FAA, Office of the
Regional Counsel, Southwest Region, 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663,
Fort Worth, Texas, or at the National Archives and Records
Administration (NARA). For information on the availability of this
material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to: https://www.archives.gov/federal_register/code_of_federal_regulations/ibr_locations.html.
(f) This amendment becomes effective on July 1, 2009.
Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on June 9, 2009.
Mark R. Schilling,
Acting Manager, Rotorcraft Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9-14081 Filed 6-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P