Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request, 27796-27798 [E9-13643]
Download as PDF
27796
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 111 / Thursday, June 11, 2009 / Notices
laboratory to locate and recruit subjects
and conduct the experiments.
Staff will pre-test the experimental
procedures with 9 subjects to ensure
that the instructions provided to
participants are clear and
comprehensible, and that the
experimental procedures are workable.
Pre-test subjects will be drawn from
FTC staff not involved with the study.
B. Estimated Hours Burden
The FTC plans to seek information
from up to 250 respondents for
approximately 90 minutes each; thus,
approximately 375 hours in total. Pretesting hours are not included in the
estimated burden because the pre-test
subjects will be FTC employees.
C. Estimated Costs Burden
The cost per respondent should be
negligible. Participation will not require
start-up, capital, or labor expenditures
by respondents. The above-noted
contractor will recruit the student and
community member subjects to
participate in this study; subjects will be
asked to respond to an initial
recruitment email to participate
voluntarily. Staff will compensate all
subjects for their participation in the 90minute study. Subjects will receive
approximately $8 as a show-up fee; in
addition, they will be compensated
according to their choices for some of
the tasks. Staff expects subjects to earn
on average $22 for these tasks, with a
range of approximately $12-$32, based
on expectations of possible
experimental outcomes. As such,
subjects will receive approximately $20$40 for the 90-minute study.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary
[FR Doc. E9–13642 Filed 6–10–09: 8:45 am]
[BILLING CODE 6750–01–S]
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission
(‘‘FTC’’ or ‘‘Commission’’).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The FTC intends to conduct
two exploratory studies on consumer
susceptibility to fraudulent and
deceptive marketing. This research will
be conducted to further the FTC’s
mission of protecting consumers from
unfair and deceptive marketing. Before
gathering this information, the FTC is
seeking public comments on its
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:37 Jun 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
proposed research. This notice seeks
comments on the Fraud Susceptibility
Internet Panel Study, one of the two
studies. The Commission is also seeking
comments on the other study in a
separate Federal Register notice.
Comments will be considered before the
FTC submits a request for Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) review
under the Paperwork Reduction Act
(PRA).
DATES: Comments must be submitted on
or before August 10, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are
invited to submit written comments
electronically or in paper form.
Comments should refer to ‘‘Fraud
Susceptibility Internet Panel Study, FTC
File No. P095500’’ to facilitate the
organization of comments. Please note
that your comment—including your
name and your state—will be placed on
the public record of this proceeding,
including on the publicly accessible
FTC Website, at (https://www.ftc.gov/os/
publiccomments.shtm).
Because comments will be made
public, they should not include any
sensitive personal information, such as
an individual’s Social Security Number;
date of birth; driver’s license number or
other state identification number, or
foreign country equivalent; passport
number; financial account number; or
credit or debit card number. Comments
also should not include any sensitive
health information, such as medical
records or other individually
identifiable health information. In
addition, comments should not include
any ‘‘[t]rade secret or any commercial or
financial information which is obtained
from any person and which is privileged
or confidential. . . .,’’ as provided in
Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade
Commission Act (‘‘FTC Act’’), 15 U.S.C.
46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR
4.10(a)(2). Comments containing
material for which confidential
treatment is requested must be filed in
paper form, must be clearly labeled
‘‘Confidential,’’ and must comply with
FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).1
Because paper mail addressed to the
FTC is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening, please
consider submitting your comments in
electronic form. Comments filed in
electronic form should be submitted by
using the following weblink: (https://
1 The comment must be accompanied by an
explicit request for confidential treatment,
including the factual and legal basis for the request,
and must identify the specific portions of the
comment to be withheld from the public record.
The request will be granted or denied by the
Commission’s General Counsel, consistent with
applicable law and the public interest. See FTC
Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
secure.commentworks.com/ftcfraudinternetpanel) (and following the
instructions on the web-based form). To
ensure that the Commission considers
an electronic comment, you must file it
on the web-based form at the weblink:
(https://secure.commentworks.com/ftcfraudinternetpanel). If this Notice
appears at (https://www.regulations.gov/
search/index.jsp), you may also file an
electronic comment through that
website. The Commission will consider
all comments that regulations.gov
forwards to it. You may also visit the
FTC Website at https://www.ftc.gov to
read the Notice and the news release
describing it.
A comment filed in paper form
should include the reference Fraud
Susceptibility Internet Panel Study, FTC
File No. P095500’’ both in the text and
on the envelope, and should be mailed
or delivered to the following address:
Federal Trade Commission, Office of the
Secretary, Room H-135 (Annex J), 600
Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington,
DC 20580. The FTC is requesting that
any comment filed in paper form be sent
by courier or overnight service, if
possible, because U.S. postal mail in the
Washington area and at the Commission
is subject to delay due to heightened
security precautions.
The FTC Act and other laws the
Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to
consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will
consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives,
whether filed in paper or electronic
form. Comments received will be
available to the public on the FTC
Website, to the extent practicable, at
(https://www.ftc.gov/os/
publiccomments.shtm). As a matter of
discretion, the Commission makes every
effort to remove home contact
information for individuals from the
public comments it receives before
placing those comments on the FTC
Website. More information, including
routine uses permitted by the Privacy
Act, may be found in the FTC’s privacy
policy, at (https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/
privacy.shtm).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be addressed to Keith B.
Anderson, Economist, Bureau of
Economics, Federal Trade Commission,
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Mail
Stop NJ-4136, Washington, DC 20580.
Telephone: (202) 326-3428; e-mail:
fraudinternetpanel@ftc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 111 / Thursday, June 11, 2009 / Notices
I. Background
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
As part of its consumer protection
mission, the FTC has brought hundreds
of cases targeting fraud, and has
committed significant resources to
educational initiatives designed to
protect consumers from fraud. The
Commission hosted a Fraud Forum2 on
February 25-26, 2009 to examine fraud
in the market place. The Commission
also conducted telephone surveys in
2003 and 2005 designed to measure the
proportion of the U.S. adult population
that has fallen victim to various
consumer frauds.3 Despite this,
surprisingly little is known about what
determines consumers’ susceptibility to
fraud. For example, the 2003 and 2005
FTC Consumer Fraud surveys found
that education was not a significant
predictor of fraud victimization.
Understanding when and why people
are vulnerable to fraud would better
inform the FTC’s substantial, ongoing
efforts to fight fraud through law
enforcement and consumer education.
Any additional insights into how and
why people fall victim to fraud could
also help improve any future fraud
surveys the Commission may undertake.
The study being announced in this
notice is a preliminary and exploratory
step toward facilitating those efforts.
The study is not intended to lead to
enforcement actions; rather, study
results may aid the FTC’s efforts to
better target its enforcement actions and
consumer education initiatives and
improve future fraud surveys.
Economic and psychological
experiments have identified several
decision-making biases, such as
impulsivity, over-confidence, overoptimism, and loss aversion, that can
cause inaccurate assessments of the
risks, costs, and benefits of various
choices. In the study announced in this
notice, FTC staff proposes to conduct a
survey using an Internet survey protocol
to examine whether susceptibility to
consumer fraud is related to these types
of decision biases. Study results also
might shed light on whether consumers
with certain behavioral traits are more
or less likely to be skeptical about
advertisements and whether there is a
relationship between ad skepticism and
2 Information on the Fraud Forum is available at:
(https://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/fraudforum/
index.shtm).
3 The Commission has published two staff reports
describing the results of these surveys—Consumer
Fraud in the United States: An FTC Survey
(published August 2004 and available at (https://
www.ftc.gov/reports/consumerfraud/
040805confraudrpt.pdf) and Consumer Fraud in the
United States: The Second FTC Survey (published
in October 2007 and available at (https://
www.ftc.gov/opa/2007/10/fraud.pdf).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:37 Jun 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
the likelihood of having been a victim
of fraud.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act
As required by Section 3506(c)(2)(A)
of the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501-21, the FTC
is providing this opportunity for public
comment before requesting that OMB
approve the study. Under the PRA,
federal agencies must obtain OMB
approval for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ means
agency requests or requirements that
members of the public submit reports,
keep records, or provide information to
a third party. 44 U.S.C. 3502(3); 5 CFR
1320.3(c).
Specifically, the FTC invites
comments on: (1) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the FTC, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of the FTC’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information; (3) ways to
enhance the quality, utility, and clarity
of the information to be collected; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of
collecting information on those who
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology, e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses. All
comments should be filed as prescribed
in the ADDRESSES section above, and
must be received on or before August
10, 2009.
A. Description of the Collection of
Information and Proposed Use
The FTC proposes to conduct a survey
which will include approximately 5,000
interviews with individuals
representing a large spectrum of the U.S.
adult population. The survey will be
conducted over the Internet, and
participants will be drawn from an
Internet survey panel maintained by a
commercial survey firm that operates
such panels. While the sample will not
be nationally representative, it will still
provide useful insights into consumer
susceptibility to fraud.4
The study will examine whether
participants have been the victim of
certain forms of consumer fraud in the
4 The FTC recognizes, of course, that a sample
drawn from an Internet panel does not represent a
random sample of the U.S. population. However,
the purpose of this study is to compare the
experiences and attitudes of people with different
characteristics rather than to estimate the
percentage or number of U.S. consumers who have
particular characteristics or experiences. As such,
using an Internet panel should not pose significant
problems.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27797
recent past. In addition, staff may
attempt to measure consumer
skepticism about advertisements, as
well as consumer knowledge, risk
attitudes, and impulsivity using existing
methods from economics and
psychological research. Staff may
measure consumer knowledge using
consumer literacy and financial literacy
surveys 5 in order to test subjects’
marketplace understanding and
sophistication. Staff seeks to determine
if the presence of such knowledge and
behavioral characteristics affects the
likelihood a person will have been a
victim of fraud.
The study will measure subjects’ risk
attitudes through a series of choices
between smaller certain amounts of
money and larger risky amounts.6 The
study’s design may describe the product
to some subjects as creating benefits,
while presenting to other subjects nearly
identical information depicted as a
reduction in harm. Staff would then test
whether fraud victims tend to be less
likely to be risk-averse and/or lossaverse than non-victims. Staff also may
seek to determine whether risk-averse
and/or loss-averse subjects are
particularly susceptible to fraudulent
claims framed as opportunities to
escape losses.7 The study may measure
subjects’ impulsivity through a series of
choices between smaller monetary
amounts received sooner and larger
amounts received later.8 Staff then
would test to see if impulsive subjects
are more likely to have been victims of
fraud and/or are more susceptible to
fraudulent claims. The study also may
measure participants’ optimism 9 and
5 See Annamaria Lusardi, Financial Literacy: An
Essential Tool for Informed Consumer Choice?,
Working Paper, Joint Center for Housing Studies,
Harvard University (2008), for examples of financial
literacy questions similar to those the FTC is
considering.
6 Staff anticipates using standard risk aversion
measurement methodologies akin to those in
Charles Holt and Susan Laury, Risk Aversion and
Incentive Effects, American Economic Review,
December 2002, 1644-1655. Some changes may be
made to the questions and question sequence since
participants in this study will not receive actual
cash payments reflecting the results of their
decisions.
7 Several academic articles report that people are
more willing to take identical risks over monetary
gambles if the risk is presented as an opportunity
to escape losses rather than as a chance to gain. Our
‘‘framing’’ methodologies may emulate those in
Amos Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, The Framing
of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice, Science,
Vol. 211, No. 4481 (Jan. 30, 1981), 453-458.
8 Staff anticipates using methodology similar to
that in Stephan Meier and Charles Sprenger,
Impatience and Credit Behavior: Evidence from a
Field Experiment, Working Papers 07-3, Federal
Reserve Bank of Boston (2007).
9 Staff plans to use standard questions similar to
those in Manju Puri and David Robinson, Optimism
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
Continued
11JNN1
27798
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 111 / Thursday, June 11, 2009 / Notices
skepticism 10 to determine how these
characteristics affect the likelihood that
someone becomes a victim of consumer
fraud. In addition, staff anticipates
collecting demographic information
from the surveyed subjects.
B. Estimated Burden Hours
The FTC plans to seek information
from approximately 5,000 respondents
using a questionnaire that should take
no more than 30 minutes to complete.
Prior to that, a pre-test of up to 100
participants will be conducted.
Allowing for an extra two minutes for
questions unique to the pretest, the
pretest should total no more than 32
minutes to complete. Accordingly, the
information collection burden of the
Internet Panel study should total no
more than 2,553 hours. Finally, the cost
per respondent should be negligible.
Participants will be compensated for
their participation in the study using the
contractor’s standard method of
rewarding members of its Internet panel
for survey participation. Participation is
voluntary and will not require start-up,
capital, or labor expenditures by
respondents.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary
[FR Doc. E9–13643 Filed 6–10–09: 8:45 am]
[BILLING CODE 6750–01–S]
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 3090–00xx]
General Services Administration
Acquisition Regulation; Submission
´ ´
for OMB Review; GSA Mentor-Protege
Program
AGENCIES: Office of the Chief
Acquisition Officer, General Services
Administration (GSA).
ACTION: Notice of request for a new
information collection.
jlentini on PROD1PC65 with NOTICES
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Regulatory
Secretariat will be submitting to the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) a request to review and approve
a new information collection concerning
´ ´
the GSA Mentor-Protege Program,
General Services Administration
and Economic Choice, Journal of Financial
Economics, 2007, Vol. 86, 71-99.
10 Staff may use the scale developed in Carl
Obermiller and Eric Spangenberg, Development of
a Scale to Measure Consumer Skepticism toward
Advertising, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol.
7, No. 2, 1998, 159-186.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:37 Jun 10, 2009
Jkt 217001
Acquisition Manual (GSAM). A request
for public comments was published in
the Federal Register at 73 FR 32669,
June 10, 2008. No comments were
received.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary; whether it will
have practical utility; whether our
estimate of the public burden of this
collection of information is accurate,
and based on valid assumptions and
methodology; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways in
which we can minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, through the use of
appropriate technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
July 13, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments regarding
this burden estimate or any other aspect
of this new information collection,
including suggestions for reducing this
burden to: General Services
Administration (GSA) OMB Desk
Officer, Room 10236, NEOB,
Washington, DC 20503, and send a copy
to the Regulatory Secretariat (VPR),
1800 F Street NW., Room 4041,
Washington, DC 20405. Please cite OMB
Control No. 3090–00xx, GSA Mentor´ ´
Protege Program, in all correspondence.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Rhonda Cundiff, Procurement Analyst,
Contract Policy Division, GSA, (202)
501–4082.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Purpose
´ ´
The GSA Mentor-Protege Program is
designed to encourage GSA prime
contractors to assist small businesses,
small disadvantaged businesses,
women-owned small businesses,
veteran-owned small businesses,
service-disabled veteran-owned small
businesses, and HUBZone small
businesses in enhancing their
capabilities to perform GSA contracts
and subcontracts, foster the
establishment of long-term business
relationships between these small
business entities and GSA prime
contractors, and increase the overall
number of small business entities that
receive GSA contract and subcontract
awards.
B. Annual Reporting Burden
Respondents: 300.
Responses per Respondent: 4.
Annual Responses: 1200.
Hours per Response: 3.
Total Burden Hours: 3600.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Obtaining Copies of Proposals:
Requesters may obtain a copy of the
information collection documents from
the General Services Administration,
Regulatory Secretariat (VPR), 1800 F
Street NW., Room 4041, Washington,
DC 20405, telephone (202) 501–4755.
Please cite OMB Control No. 3090–00xx,
´ ´
GSA Mentor-Protege Program, in all
correspondence.
Dated: June 5, 2009.
Al Matera,
Director, Office of Acquisition Policy.
[FR Doc. E9–13738 Filed 6–10–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–EP–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND
SPACE ADMINISTRATION
[OMB Control No. 9000–0069]
Federal Acquisition Regulation;
Information Collection; Indirect Cost
Rates
Agencies: Department of Defense
(DOD), General Services Administration
(GSA), and National Aeronautics and
Space Administration (NASA).
ACTION: Notice of request for comments
regarding a renewal to an existing OMB
clearance.
SUMMARY: Under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. Chapter 35), the Federal
Acquisition Regulation (FAR)
Regulatory Secretariat will be
submitting to the Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) a request to review
and approve an extension of a currently
approved information collection
requirement concerning Indirect Cost
Rates.
Public comments are particularly
invited on: Whether this collection of
information is necessary; whether it will
have practical utility; whether our
estimate of the public burden of this
collection of information is accurate,
and based on valid assumptions and
methodology; ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways in
which we can minimize the burden of
the collection of information on those
who are to respond, through the use of
appropriate technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
August 10, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\11JNN1.SGM
11JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 111 (Thursday, June 11, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27796-27798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13643]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request
AGENCY: Federal Trade Commission (``FTC'' or ``Commission'').
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FTC intends to conduct two exploratory studies on consumer
susceptibility to fraudulent and deceptive marketing. This research
will be conducted to further the FTC's mission of protecting consumers
from unfair and deceptive marketing. Before gathering this information,
the FTC is seeking public comments on its proposed research. This
notice seeks comments on the Fraud Susceptibility Internet Panel Study,
one of the two studies. The Commission is also seeking comments on the
other study in a separate Federal Register notice. Comments will be
considered before the FTC submits a request for Office of Management
and Budget (OMB) review under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
DATES: Comments must be submitted on or before August 10, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Interested parties are invited to submit written comments
electronically or in paper form. Comments should refer to ``Fraud
Susceptibility Internet Panel Study, FTC File No. P095500'' to
facilitate the organization of comments. Please note that your
comment--including your name and your state--will be placed on the
public record of this proceeding, including on the publicly accessible
FTC Website, at (https://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm).
Because comments will be made public, they should not include any
sensitive personal information, such as an individual's Social Security
Number; date of birth; driver's license number or other state
identification number, or foreign country equivalent; passport number;
financial account number; or credit or debit card number. Comments also
should not include any sensitive health information, such as medical
records or other individually identifiable health information. In
addition, comments should not include any ``[t]rade secret or any
commercial or financial information which is obtained from any person
and which is privileged or confidential. . . .,'' as provided in
Section 6(f) of the Federal Trade Commission Act (``FTC Act''), 15
U.S.C. 46(f), and FTC Rule 4.10(a)(2), 16 CFR 4.10(a)(2). Comments
containing material for which confidential treatment is requested must
be filed in paper form, must be clearly labeled ``Confidential,'' and
must comply with FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR 4.9(c).\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The comment must be accompanied by an explicit request for
confidential treatment, including the factual and legal basis for
the request, and must identify the specific portions of the comment
to be withheld from the public record. The request will be granted
or denied by the Commission's General Counsel, consistent with
applicable law and the public interest. See FTC Rule 4.9(c), 16 CFR
4.9(c).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Because paper mail addressed to the FTC is subject to delay due to
heightened security screening, please consider submitting your comments
in electronic form. Comments filed in electronic form should be
submitted by using the following weblink: (https://secure.commentworks.com/ftc-fraudinternetpanel) (and following the
instructions on the web-based form). To ensure that the Commission
considers an electronic comment, you must file it on the web-based form
at the weblink: (https://secure.commentworks.com/ftc-fraudinternetpanel). If this Notice appears at (https://www.regulations.gov/search/index.jsp), you may also file an electronic
comment through that website. The Commission will consider all comments
that regulations.gov forwards to it. You may also visit the FTC Website
at https://www.ftc.gov to read the Notice and the news release
describing it.
A comment filed in paper form should include the reference Fraud
Susceptibility Internet Panel Study, FTC File No. P095500'' both in the
text and on the envelope, and should be mailed or delivered to the
following address: Federal Trade Commission, Office of the Secretary,
Room H-135 (Annex J), 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Washington, DC
20580. The FTC is requesting that any comment filed in paper form be
sent by courier or overnight service, if possible, because U.S. postal
mail in the Washington area and at the Commission is subject to delay
due to heightened security precautions.
The FTC Act and other laws the Commission administers permit the
collection of public comments to consider and use in this proceeding as
appropriate. The Commission will consider all timely and responsive
public comments that it receives, whether filed in paper or electronic
form. Comments received will be available to the public on the FTC
Website, to the extent practicable, at (https://www.ftc.gov/os/publiccomments.shtm). As a matter of discretion, the Commission makes
every effort to remove home contact information for individuals from
the public comments it receives before placing those comments on the
FTC Website. More information, including routine uses permitted by the
Privacy Act, may be found in the FTC's privacy policy, at (https://www.ftc.gov/ftc/privacy.shtm).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be addressed to Keith B. Anderson, Economist, Bureau of
Economics, Federal Trade Commission, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Mail
Stop NJ-4136, Washington, DC 20580. Telephone: (202) 326-3428; e-mail:
fraudinternetpanel@ftc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 27797]]
I. Background
As part of its consumer protection mission, the FTC has brought
hundreds of cases targeting fraud, and has committed significant
resources to educational initiatives designed to protect consumers from
fraud. The Commission hosted a Fraud Forum\2\ on February 25-26, 2009
to examine fraud in the market place. The Commission also conducted
telephone surveys in 2003 and 2005 designed to measure the proportion
of the U.S. adult population that has fallen victim to various consumer
frauds.\3\ Despite this, surprisingly little is known about what
determines consumers' susceptibility to fraud. For example, the 2003
and 2005 FTC Consumer Fraud surveys found that education was not a
significant predictor of fraud victimization. Understanding when and
why people are vulnerable to fraud would better inform the FTC's
substantial, ongoing efforts to fight fraud through law enforcement and
consumer education. Any additional insights into how and why people
fall victim to fraud could also help improve any future fraud surveys
the Commission may undertake. The study being announced in this notice
is a preliminary and exploratory step toward facilitating those
efforts. The study is not intended to lead to enforcement actions;
rather, study results may aid the FTC's efforts to better target its
enforcement actions and consumer education initiatives and improve
future fraud surveys.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Information on the Fraud Forum is available at: (https://www.ftc.gov/bcp/workshops/fraudforum/index.shtm).
\3\ The Commission has published two staff reports describing
the results of these surveys--Consumer Fraud in the United States:
An FTC Survey (published August 2004 and available at (https://www.ftc.gov/reports/consumerfraud/040805confraudrpt.pdf) and
Consumer Fraud in the United States: The Second FTC Survey
(published in October 2007 and available at (https://www.ftc.gov/opa/2007/10/fraud.pdf).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Economic and psychological experiments have identified several
decision-making biases, such as impulsivity, over-confidence, over-
optimism, and loss aversion, that can cause inaccurate assessments of
the risks, costs, and benefits of various choices. In the study
announced in this notice, FTC staff proposes to conduct a survey using
an Internet survey protocol to examine whether susceptibility to
consumer fraud is related to these types of decision biases. Study
results also might shed light on whether consumers with certain
behavioral traits are more or less likely to be skeptical about
advertisements and whether there is a relationship between ad
skepticism and the likelihood of having been a victim of fraud.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act
As required by Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA, 44 U.S.C. 3501-21,
the FTC is providing this opportunity for public comment before
requesting that OMB approve the study. Under the PRA, federal agencies
must obtain OMB approval for each collection of information they
conduct or sponsor. ``Collection of information'' means agency requests
or requirements that members of the public submit reports, keep
records, or provide information to a third party. 44 U.S.C. 3502(3); 5
CFR 1320.3(c).
Specifically, the FTC invites comments on: (1) whether the proposed
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the FTC, including whether the information will have
practical utility; (2) the accuracy of the FTC's estimate of the burden
of the proposed collection of information; (3) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(4) ways to minimize the burden of collecting information on those who
respond, including through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology, e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses. All comments should be filed as prescribed in
the ADDRESSES section above, and must be received on or before August
10, 2009.
A. Description of the Collection of Information and Proposed Use
The FTC proposes to conduct a survey which will include
approximately 5,000 interviews with individuals representing a large
spectrum of the U.S. adult population. The survey will be conducted
over the Internet, and participants will be drawn from an Internet
survey panel maintained by a commercial survey firm that operates such
panels. While the sample will not be nationally representative, it will
still provide useful insights into consumer susceptibility to fraud.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The FTC recognizes, of course, that a sample drawn from an
Internet panel does not represent a random sample of the U.S.
population. However, the purpose of this study is to compare the
experiences and attitudes of people with different characteristics
rather than to estimate the percentage or number of U.S. consumers
who have particular characteristics or experiences. As such, using
an Internet panel should not pose significant problems.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The study will examine whether participants have been the victim of
certain forms of consumer fraud in the recent past. In addition, staff
may attempt to measure consumer skepticism about advertisements, as
well as consumer knowledge, risk attitudes, and impulsivity using
existing methods from economics and psychological research. Staff may
measure consumer knowledge using consumer literacy and financial
literacy surveys \5\ in order to test subjects' marketplace
understanding and sophistication. Staff seeks to determine if the
presence of such knowledge and behavioral characteristics affects the
likelihood a person will have been a victim of fraud.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See Annamaria Lusardi, Financial Literacy: An Essential Tool
for Informed Consumer Choice?, Working Paper, Joint Center for
Housing Studies, Harvard University (2008), for examples of
financial literacy questions similar to those the FTC is
considering.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The study will measure subjects' risk attitudes through a series of
choices between smaller certain amounts of money and larger risky
amounts.\6\ The study's design may describe the product to some
subjects as creating benefits, while presenting to other subjects
nearly identical information depicted as a reduction in harm. Staff
would then test whether fraud victims tend to be less likely to be
risk-averse and/or loss-averse than non-victims. Staff also may seek to
determine whether risk-averse and/or loss-averse subjects are
particularly susceptible to fraudulent claims framed as opportunities
to escape losses.\7\ The study may measure subjects' impulsivity
through a series of choices between smaller monetary amounts received
sooner and larger amounts received later.\8\ Staff then would test to
see if impulsive subjects are more likely to have been victims of fraud
and/or are more susceptible to fraudulent claims. The study also may
measure participants' optimism \9\ and
[[Page 27798]]
skepticism \10\ to determine how these characteristics affect the
likelihood that someone becomes a victim of consumer fraud. In
addition, staff anticipates collecting demographic information from the
surveyed subjects.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Staff anticipates using standard risk aversion measurement
methodologies akin to those in Charles Holt and Susan Laury, Risk
Aversion and Incentive Effects, American Economic Review, December
2002, 1644-1655. Some changes may be made to the questions and
question sequence since participants in this study will not receive
actual cash payments reflecting the results of their decisions.
\7\ Several academic articles report that people are more
willing to take identical risks over monetary gambles if the risk is
presented as an opportunity to escape losses rather than as a chance
to gain. Our ``framing'' methodologies may emulate those in Amos
Tversky and Daniel Kahneman, The Framing of Decisions and the
Psychology of Choice, Science, Vol. 211, No. 4481 (Jan. 30, 1981),
453-458.
\8\ Staff anticipates using methodology similar to that in
Stephan Meier and Charles Sprenger, Impatience and Credit Behavior:
Evidence from a Field Experiment, Working Papers 07-3, Federal
Reserve Bank of Boston (2007).
\9\ Staff plans to use standard questions similar to those in
Manju Puri and David Robinson, Optimism and Economic Choice, Journal
of Financial Economics, 2007, Vol. 86, 71-99.
\10\ Staff may use the scale developed in Carl Obermiller and
Eric Spangenberg, Development of a Scale to Measure Consumer
Skepticism toward Advertising, Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol.
7, No. 2, 1998, 159-186.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Estimated Burden Hours
The FTC plans to seek information from approximately 5,000
respondents using a questionnaire that should take no more than 30
minutes to complete. Prior to that, a pre-test of up to 100
participants will be conducted. Allowing for an extra two minutes for
questions unique to the pretest, the pretest should total no more than
32 minutes to complete. Accordingly, the information collection burden
of the Internet Panel study should total no more than 2,553 hours.
Finally, the cost per respondent should be negligible. Participants
will be compensated for their participation in the study using the
contractor's standard method of rewarding members of its Internet panel
for survey participation. Participation is voluntary and will not
require start-up, capital, or labor expenditures by respondents.
By direction of the Commission.
Donald S. Clark,
Secretary
[FR Doc. E9-13643 Filed 6-10-09: 8:45 am]
[BILLING CODE 6750-01-S]