International Conference on Harmonisation; Guidance on Q8(R1) Pharmaceutical Development; Addition of Annex; Availability, 27325-27326 [E9-13374]
Download as PDF
27325
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 9, 2009 / Notices
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.
Proposed Project
National Survey of Residential Care
Facilities (NSRCF), (OMB No. 0920–
0780)—Revision— National Center for
Health Statistics (NCHS), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
Section 306 of the Public Health
Service (PHS) Act (42 U.S.C. 242k), as
amended, authorizes that the Secretary
of Health and Human Services (DHHS),
acting through NCHS, ‘‘shall collect
statistics on health resources * * *
[and] utilization of health care,
including extended care facilities, and
other institutions.’’
In 2008, NCHS sought approval for a
pretest and full survey of The National
Survey of Residential Care Facilities
(NSRCF). OMB approved only the
pretest which has been completed.
NCHS now seeks approval to collect the
full survey. The survey is designed to
complement data collected by other
federal surveys and to fill a significant
data gap about a major portion of the
long-term care population. Data from
NSRCF will provide information on
residential care facilities that
policymakers, providers, and
researchers can use to address a wide
array of policy and research questions.
The survey will utilize a computerassisted personal interviewing (CAPI)
system to collect information about
facility and resident characteristics.
This computerized system speeds the
flow of data and makes it possible to
release information on a timelier basis
and easier for respondents to participate
in the survey. The CAPI system may
also enhance data quality. Clearance for
two years is requested.
A stratified random sample of
residential care facilities across four
strata (small, medium, large and very
large) will be selected to participate in
NSRCF. Within each facility a random
sample of residents will be selected. To
be eligible a facility must be licensed,
registered, listed, certified, or otherwise
regulated by the State; provide room
and board with at least two meals a day;
provide around-the-clock on-site
supervision; help with activities of daily
living (e.g., bathing, eating, or dressing)
or medication supervision; serve
primarily an adult population; and have
at least four beds.
The facility questionnaire will collect
data about facility characteristics (e.g.,
size, age, types of rooms), services
offered, characteristics of the resident
population, facility policies and
services, charges for services, and
background of the director. The resident
questionnaire collects information on
resident demographics, current living
arrangements within the facility,
involvement in activities, use of
services, charges for care, health status,
and cognitive and physical functioning.
For the national survey, approximately
2,250 facilities will be surveyed for an
annual average of 1,125 facilities.
Information on an average of 4 residents
will be collected from an annual average
of 1,125 facility staff. Residents
themselves will not be interviewed.
Users of NSRCF data include, but are
not limited to CDC; other Department of
Health and Human Services (DHHS)
agencies, such as the Office of the
Assistant Secretary for Planning and
Evaluation and the Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality; and
associations, such as the American
Association of Homes and Services for
the Aging, National Center for Assisted
Living, American Seniors Housing
Association, Assisted Living Federation
of America; universities; foundations;
and other private sector organizations.
There is no cost to respondents other
than their time to participate.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE
Type of respondent
Facility
Facility
Facility
Facility
Facility
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Number of
respondents
Name of form
Average
burden/
response
(in hours)
Number of
responses/
respondent
Response
burden
in hours
.....................................
.....................................
.....................................
.....................................
or Staff Member ..........
Facility Screener ..................................
Resident Selection ...............................
Pre-Interview Worksheet ......................
Facility Questionnaire ...........................
Resident Questionnaire ........................
1125
1125
1125
1125
1125
1
1
1
1
4
10/60
10/60
15/60
1.25
20/60
188
188
281
1,406
1,500
Total ...............................................
...............................................................
......................
......................
......................
3,563
Dated: June 3, 2009.
Maryam I. Daneshvar,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Office of
the Chief Science Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9–13409 Filed 6–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2007–D–0148] (formerly
Docket No. 2007D–0493)
International Conference on
Harmonisation; Guidance on Q8(R1)
Pharmaceutical Development; Addition
of Annex; Availability
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:45 Jun 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Notice.
Frm 00050
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance entitled
‘‘Q8(R1) Pharmaceutical Development.’’
The guidance was prepared under the
auspices of the International Conference
on Harmonisation of Technical
Requirements for Registration of
Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH).
The ICH Q8(R1) guidance includes the
previously published parent guidance
entitled ‘‘Q8 Pharmaceutical
Development’’ (Q8 parent guidance) (71
FR 29344; May 22, 2006) and a newly
added annex. The annex provides
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
27326
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 109 / Tuesday, June 9, 2009 / Notices
further clarification of key concepts
outlined in the Q8 parent guidance and
describes the principles of quality by
design (QbD). The annex is intended to
show how concepts and tools (e.g.,
design space) outlined in the Q8 parent
guidance could be put into practice by
the applicant for all dosage forms.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on agency guidances at any
time.
Submit written requests for
single copies of the guidance to the
Division of Drug Information, Center for
Drug Evaluation and Research, Food
and Drug Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 51, rm. 2201,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002, or the
Office of Communication, Outreach and
Development (HFM–40), Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research
(CBER), Food and Drug Administration,
1401 Rockville Pike, suite 200N,
Rockville, MD 20852–1448. The
guidance may also be obtained by mail
by calling CBER at 1–800–835–4709 or
301–827–1800. Send two self-addressed
adhesive labels to assist the office in
processing your requests. Submit
written comments on the guidance to
the Division of Dockets Management
(HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. Submit
electronic comments to https://
www.regulations.gov. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for
electronic access to the guidance
document.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regarding the guidance: Moheb Nasr,
Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug
Administration, 10903 New
Hampshire Ave., Bldg. 21, rm. 2630,
Silver Spring, MD 20993–0002,
301–796–1900; or
Christopher Joneckis, Center for
Biologics Evaluation and Research
(HFM–25), Food and Drug
Administration, 1401 Rockville
Pike, suite 200, Rockville, MD
20852–1448, 301–827–0373.
Regarding the ICH: Michelle Limoli,
Office of International Programs
(HFG–1), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–827–
4480.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In recent years, many important
initiatives have been undertaken by
regulatory authorities and industry
associations to promote international
harmonization of regulatory
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:45 Jun 08, 2009
Jkt 217001
requirements. FDA has participated in
many meetings designed to enhance
harmonization and is committed to
seeking scientifically based harmonized
technical procedures for pharmaceutical
development. One of the goals of
harmonization is to identify and then
reduce differences in technical
requirements for drug development
among regulatory agencies.
ICH was organized to provide an
opportunity for tripartite harmonization
initiatives to be developed with input
from both regulatory and industry
representatives. FDA also seeks input
from consumer representatives and
others. ICH is concerned with
harmonization of technical
requirements for the registration of
pharmaceutical products among three
regions: The European Union, Japan,
and the United States. The six ICH
sponsors are the European Commission;
the European Federation of
Pharmaceutical Industries Associations;
the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour,
and Welfare; the Japanese
Pharmaceutical Manufacturers
Association; the Centers for Drug
Evaluation and Research and Biologics
Evaluation and Research, FDA; and the
Pharmaceutical Research and
Manufacturers of America. The ICH
Secretariat, which coordinates the
preparation of documentation, is
provided by the International
Federation of Pharmaceutical
Manufacturers Associations (IFPMA).
The ICH Steering Committee includes
representatives from each of the ICH
sponsors and the IFPMA, as well as
observers from the World Health
Organization, Health Canada, and the
European Free Trade Area.
In the Federal Register of January 10,
2008 (73 FR 1890), FDA published a
notice announcing the availability of a
draft guidance entitled ‘‘Q8(R1)
Pharmaceutical Development Revision
1.’’ The notice gave interested persons
an opportunity to submit comments by
April 9, 2008.
After consideration of the comments
received and revisions to the guidance,
a final draft of the guidance was
submitted to the ICH Steering
Committee and endorsed by the three
participating regulatory agencies in
November 2008. Revisions were made
in response to comments received by
the three ICH regions to better express
the original intent of the draft.
The annex added to the Q8 parent
guidance provides further clarification
of key concepts outlined in the Q8
parent guidance and describes the
principles of QbD. The annex is not
intended to establish new standards or
increase regulatory expectations. It is
PO 00000
Frm 00051
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
intended to show how concepts and
tools (e.g., design space) outlined in the
Q8 parent guidance could be put into
practice by the applicant for all dosage
forms. Following the addition of the
annex to the Q8 parent guidance, ICH
recoded the parent guidance Q8(R1).
This guidance is being issued
consistent with FDA’s good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115).
The guidance represents the agency’s
current thinking on this topic. It does
not create or confer any rights for or on
any person and does not operate to bind
FDA or the public. An alternative
approach may be used if such approach
satisfies the requirements of the
applicable statutes and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the
Division of Dockets Management (see
ADDRESSES) written comments on the
guidance. Submit a single copy of
electronic comments or two paper
copies of any mailed comments, except
that individuals may submit one paper
copy. Comments are to be identified
with the docket number found in
brackets in the heading of this
document. Received comments may be
seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m.,
Monday through Friday.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet
may obtain the document at https://
www.regulations.gov, https://www.fda.
gov/Drugs/GuidanceCompliance
RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/
default.htm, or https://www.fda.gov/
BiologicsBloodVaccines/Guidance
ComplianceRegulatoryInformation/
default.htm.
Dated: May 27, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E9–13374 Filed 6–8–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0664]
Psychopharmacologic Drugs Advisory
Committee; Notice of Meeting
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
This notice announces a forthcoming
meeting of a public advisory committee
of the Food and Drug Administration
E:\FR\FM\09JNN1.SGM
09JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 109 (Tuesday, June 9, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27325-27326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13374]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2007-D-0148] (formerly Docket No. 2007D-0493)
International Conference on Harmonisation; Guidance on Q8(R1)
Pharmaceutical Development; Addition of Annex; Availability
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the
availability of a guidance entitled ``Q8(R1) Pharmaceutical
Development.'' The guidance was prepared under the auspices of the
International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for
Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). The ICH Q8(R1)
guidance includes the previously published parent guidance entitled
``Q8 Pharmaceutical Development'' (Q8 parent guidance) (71 FR 29344;
May 22, 2006) and a newly added annex. The annex provides
[[Page 27326]]
further clarification of key concepts outlined in the Q8 parent
guidance and describes the principles of quality by design (QbD). The
annex is intended to show how concepts and tools (e.g., design space)
outlined in the Q8 parent guidance could be put into practice by the
applicant for all dosage forms.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on agency guidances at any
time.
ADDRESSES: Submit written requests for single copies of the guidance to
the Division of Drug Information, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
51, rm. 2201, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, or the Office of
Communication, Outreach and Development (HFM-40), Center for Biologics
Evaluation and Research (CBER), Food and Drug Administration, 1401
Rockville Pike, suite 200N, Rockville, MD 20852-1448. The guidance may
also be obtained by mail by calling CBER at 1-800-835-4709 or 301-827-
1800. Send two self-addressed adhesive labels to assist the office in
processing your requests. Submit written comments on the guidance to
the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852.
Submit electronic comments to https://www.regulations.gov. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section for electronic access to the guidance
document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regarding the guidance: Moheb Nasr, Center for Drug Evaluation and
Research, Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Bldg.
21, rm. 2630, Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002, 301-796-1900; or
Christopher Joneckis, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
(HFM-25), Food and Drug Administration, 1401 Rockville Pike, suite 200,
Rockville, MD 20852-1448, 301-827-0373.
Regarding the ICH: Michelle Limoli, Office of International
Programs (HFG-1), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-827-4480.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In recent years, many important initiatives have been undertaken by
regulatory authorities and industry associations to promote
international harmonization of regulatory requirements. FDA has
participated in many meetings designed to enhance harmonization and is
committed to seeking scientifically based harmonized technical
procedures for pharmaceutical development. One of the goals of
harmonization is to identify and then reduce differences in technical
requirements for drug development among regulatory agencies.
ICH was organized to provide an opportunity for tripartite
harmonization initiatives to be developed with input from both
regulatory and industry representatives. FDA also seeks input from
consumer representatives and others. ICH is concerned with
harmonization of technical requirements for the registration of
pharmaceutical products among three regions: The European Union, Japan,
and the United States. The six ICH sponsors are the European
Commission; the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries
Associations; the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare; the
Japanese Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association; the Centers for Drug
Evaluation and Research and Biologics Evaluation and Research, FDA; and
the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. The ICH
Secretariat, which coordinates the preparation of documentation, is
provided by the International Federation of Pharmaceutical
Manufacturers Associations (IFPMA).
The ICH Steering Committee includes representatives from each of
the ICH sponsors and the IFPMA, as well as observers from the World
Health Organization, Health Canada, and the European Free Trade Area.
In the Federal Register of January 10, 2008 (73 FR 1890), FDA
published a notice announcing the availability of a draft guidance
entitled ``Q8(R1) Pharmaceutical Development Revision 1.'' The notice
gave interested persons an opportunity to submit comments by April 9,
2008.
After consideration of the comments received and revisions to the
guidance, a final draft of the guidance was submitted to the ICH
Steering Committee and endorsed by the three participating regulatory
agencies in November 2008. Revisions were made in response to comments
received by the three ICH regions to better express the original intent
of the draft.
The annex added to the Q8 parent guidance provides further
clarification of key concepts outlined in the Q8 parent guidance and
describes the principles of QbD. The annex is not intended to establish
new standards or increase regulatory expectations. It is intended to
show how concepts and tools (e.g., design space) outlined in the Q8
parent guidance could be put into practice by the applicant for all
dosage forms. Following the addition of the annex to the Q8 parent
guidance, ICH recoded the parent guidance Q8(R1).
This guidance is being issued consistent with FDA's good guidance
practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the
agency's current thinking on this topic. It does not create or confer
any rights for or on any person and does not operate to bind FDA or the
public. An alternative approach may be used if such approach satisfies
the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.
II. Comments
Interested persons may submit to the Division of Dockets Management
(see ADDRESSES) written comments on the guidance. Submit a single copy
of electronic comments or two paper copies of any mailed comments,
except that individuals may submit one paper copy. Comments are to be
identified with the docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document. Received comments may be seen in the Division of Dockets
Management between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday.
III. Electronic Access
Persons with access to the Internet may obtain the document at
https://www.regulations.gov, https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/default.htm, or
https://www.fda.gov/BiologicsBloodVaccines/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/default.htm.
Dated: May 27, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E9-13374 Filed 6-8-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S