NRC Enforcement Policy Revision, 27191-27192 [E9-13298]
Download as PDF
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 108 / Monday, June 8, 2009 / Notices
the NRC for January 30, April 15, and
August 24, 2007. The Petitioner
requested that (1) the Indian Point
facilities be shut down until such time
as the new emergency siren system with
backup electrical power is fully
operational and has met all Federal
Emergency Management Agency
(FEMA) and NRC requirements and (2)
Entergy be fined $130,000 per day from
the date of his petition until Entergy
complies with the NRC’s Confirmatory
Order dated January 31, 2006.
As the basis for the January 24, 2008,
request that amended the original
petition, the Petitioner cited Entergy’s
lack of adequate maintenance and aging
management procedures leading to the
discovery of significant corrosion on
components of the new emergency siren
system. The Petitioner requested that (1)
the Indian Point facilities be shut down,
(2) the operating licenses for the Indian
Point facilities be suspended until they
are in full compliance with their design
basis threat, current licensing basis, and
all NRC rules and regulations, and (3)
Entergy be fined $500,000 per day until
the new siren system has been fully
approved by all levels of government.
As the basis for the March 30, 2008,
request, the Petitioner citing numerous
discharges of radiological and chemical
carcinogens, both legal and illegal, over
an extended period of time that
continue to expose the Petitioner, his
family, and pets to contaminants. The
Petitioner again requested that the
Indian Point facilities be shut down and
remain shut down until a large number
of actions are completed including
implementation of the new emergency
siren system that has received all
government approvals.
On December 21, 2007, and August
14, 2008, the Petitioner and the licensee
met with the staff’s Petition Review
Board. The meetings gave the Petitioner
and the licensee an opportunity to
provide additional information and to
clarify issues cited in the petition.
The NRC sent a copy of the proposed
Director’s Decision to the Petitioner and
to Entergy for comment on March 23,
2009. The staff did not receive any
comments on the proposed Director’s
Decision.
The Director of the Office of Nuclear
Reactor Regulation denied the
Petitioner’s request to suspend the
operating licenses of the Indian Point
Nuclear Generating Unit Nos. 2 and 3
and the Petitioner’s request to impose
daily civil penalties for the untimely
implementation of the new siren
system. In addition, the Petitioner’s
request to place Indian Point Unit Nos.
2 and 3 in cold shutdown, and to
suspend the licenses of Indian Point
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:15 Jun 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
Unit Nos. 2 and 3 until the licensee
comes into full compliance with the
design basis threat, the current licensing
basis and all NRC rules, because of
corrosion in siren components, was also
denied. The reasons for this decision are
explained in the Director’s Decision
pursuant to Title 10 of Code of Federal
Regulations (10 CFR) Section 2.206
[DD–09–01], the complete text of which
is available in Agencywide documents
Access and Management System
(ADAMS) Accession No. ML091210629
for inspection at the Commission’s
Public Document Room, located at One
White Flint North, Public File Area O1
F21, 11555 Rockville Pike (first floor),
Rockville, Maryland, and from the
ADAMS Public Library component on
the NRC’s Web site, https://www.nrc.gov/
reading-rm.html (the Public Electronic
Reading Room).
A copy of the Director’s Decision will
be filed with the Secretary of the
Commission for the Commission’s
review in accordance with 10 CFR 2.206
of the Commission’s regulations. As
provided for by this regulation, the
Director’s Decision will constitute the
final action of the Commission 25 days
after the date of the decision, unless the
Commission, on its own motion,
institutes a review of the director’s
decision in that time.
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 29th day
of May 2009.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Eric J. Leeds,
Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation.
[FR Doc. E9–13297 Filed 6–5–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2008–0497]
NRC Enforcement Policy Revision
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Notice of availability of revised
draft supplements and request for
comments.
SUMMARY: On September 15, 2008 (73
FR 53286), the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) published a notice
of availability and request for comments
on its draft proposed revised
Enforcement Policy (Enforcement
Policy). A corrected proposed revised
Enforcement Policy was published on
October 16, 2008 (73 FR 61442). The
public comment period for the revised
Enforcement Policy ended on November
14, 2008. The NRC is now soliciting
PO 00000
Frm 00104
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27191
written comments from interested
parties including public interest groups,
States, members of the public and the
regulated industry (i.e., reactor and
materials licensees, vendors, and
contractors), on additional proposed
revisions to Section 6.0, Supplements–
Violation Examples, of the proposed
revised Enforcement Policy. This Notice
of Availability and request for
comments apply only to new proposed
revisions to Section 6.0 of the proposed
revised Enforcement Policy.
DATES: Submit comments on or before
July 8, 2009. Comments received after
this date will be considered if it is
practical to do so, but the Commission
is able to assure consideration only for
comments received on or before this
date.
ADDRESSES: Comments will be made
available to the public in their entirety;
personal information, such as your
name, address, telephone number, email address, etc. will not be removed
from your submission. You may submit
comments by any one of the following
methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov; search on docket
ID: NRC–2008–0497.
Mail Comments to: Michael T. Lesar,
Chief, Rulemaking and Directives
Branch, Mail Stop: TWB–05–B01M,
Division of Administrative Services,
Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington,
DC 20555–0001.
You can access publicly available
documents related to this notice using
the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
Documents related to this notice,
including public comments, are
accessible at https://
www.regulations.gov, by searching on
docket ID: NRC–2008–0497.
NRC’s Public Document Room (PDR):
The public may examine and have
copied for a fee, publicly available
documents at the NRC’s PDR, Public
File Area O–1F21, One White Flint
North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland.
NRC’s Agencywide Document Access
and Management System (ADAMS): The
revised draft Supplements of the
proposed revised Enforcement Policy
are available electronically at the NRC’s
Electronic Reading Room at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html
under ADAMS Accession Number
(ML091520156). From this site, the
public can gain entry into ADAMS,
which provides text and image files of
the NRC’s public documents. In
addition, revised draft Supplements of
the proposed revised Enforcement
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
27192
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 108 / Monday, June 8, 2009 / Notices
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with NOTICES
Policy will be available at https://
www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/
enforcement/public-involvement.html. If
you do not have Internet access or if
there are problems in accessing the
documents located in ADAMS, contact
the PDR Reference staff at 1–800–397–
4209, 301–415–4737 or by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Doug Starkey, Office of Enforcement,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555;
Doug.Starkey@nrc.gov, 301–415–3456.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
As discussed in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION of the September 15, 2008
document (73 FR 53286), the NRC, in
developing the proposed revised
Enforcement Policy, in many instances
reworded, deleted, or moved (i.e.,
moved to the NRC Enforcement Manual,
an NRC staff guidance document) some
of the information in the current
Enforcement Policy. (See the table at
ML083050133 for a listing of subject
matter in the current Enforcement
Policy which was not carried over into
the proposed revised Enforcement
Policy.) For example, Section 6.0,
Supplements–Violation Examples, of
the proposed revised Enforcement
Policy was significantly reorganized,
reworded, and contained much less
detail than the supplements in the
current Enforcement Policy. In addition,
the NRC had also planned to add
detailed violation examples to the
Enforcement Manual to serve as further
guidance to NRC inspectors. However,
based on public comments received in
response to the September and October
2008 publications of the proposed
revised Enforcement Policy, the NRC
has reconsidered its original plan to
have abbreviated violation examples in
the revised Enforcement Policy and
detailed violation examples in the
Enforcement Manual. The NRC now
proposes to continue its past practice of
providing violation example
supplements in the Enforcement Policy.
These revised supplements are intended
to cover, in more detail than originally
planned, a broad range of circumstances
in each of the four severity levels in
each of 14 activity areas. It should be
noted that the supplements in Section
6.0 of the proposed revised Enforcement
Policy are not intended to address every
possible circumstance and are therefore
neither exhaustive nor controlling.
Because the revised violation
supplements that are being proposed for
the revised Enforcement Policy have, in
some instances, been changed
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:15 Jun 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
significantly from those previously
published, the NRC is providing an
opportunity for public comments on the
proposed revised supplements.
The NRC maintains the Enforcement
Policy on its Web site at https://
www.nrc.gov; select Public Meetings
and Involvement, Enforcement, and
then Enforcement Policy.
Procedural Requirements:
Paperwork Reduction Act
This policy statement does not
contain new or amended information
collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing
requirements were approved by the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), approval number 3150–0136.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a request for information or an
information collection requirement
unless the requesting document
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Congressional Review Act
In accordance with the Congressional
Review Act of 1996, the NRC has
determined that this action is not a
major rule and has verified this
determination with the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Dated at Rockville, MD, this 1st day of June
2009.
Cynthia A. Carpenter,
Director, Office of Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E9–13298 Filed 6–5–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
[NRC–2009–0208]
Report to Congress on Abnormal
Occurrences; Fiscal Year 2008;
Dissemination of Information
Section 208 of the Energy
Reorganization Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93–
438) defines an abnormal occurrence
(AO) as an unscheduled incident or
event which the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC)
determines to be significant from the
standpoint of public health or safety.
The Federal Reports Elimination and
Sunset Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–68)
requires that AOs be reported to
Congress annually. During Fiscal Year
2008, ten events that occurred at
facilities licensed or otherwise regulated
PO 00000
Frm 00105
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
by the NRC and/or Agreement States
were determined to be AOs. The report
describes five events at NRC-licensed
facilities. The first NRC-licensee event
involved radiation exposure to an
embryo/fetus. The other four NRClicensee events were medical events, as
defined in Title 10, Part 35, of the Code
of Federal Regulations (10 CFR Part 35).
All five NRC-licensee events occurred at
medical institutions. The report also
describes five events at Agreement
State-licensed facilities. [Agreement
States are those States that have entered
into formal agreements with the NRC
pursuant to Section 274 of the Atomic
Energy Act (AEA) to regulate certain
quantities of AEA licensed material at
facilities located within their borders.]
Currently, there are 35 Agreement
States. The first Agreement Statelicensee event involved radiation
exposure to an embryo/fetus. The other
four Agreement State-licensee events
were medical events, as defined in 10
CFR Part 35, and occurred at medical
institutions. As required by Section 208,
the discussion for each event includes
the date and place, nature and probable
consequences, the cause or causes, and
the actions taken to prevent recurrence.
Each event is also being described in
NUREG–0090, Vol. 31, ‘‘Report to
Congress on Abnormal Occurrences:
Fiscal Year 2008.’’ This report is
available electronically at the NRC Web
site https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doccollections/nuregs/staff/.
There are three major categories of
events reported in this document: I. For
All Licensees, II. For Commercial
Nuclear Power Plant Licensees, and III.
Events at Facilities Other Than Nuclear
Power Plants and all Transportation
Events. The full report, available on the
NRC Web site, provides the specific
criteria for determining when an event
is an abnormal occurrence (AO) and
discusses ‘‘Other Events of Interest’’ that
do not meet the AO criteria but which
the Commission has determined should
be included in the report. The event
identification number begins with ‘‘AS’’
for Agreement State AO events and
‘‘NRC’’ for NRC AO events.
I. For All Licensees
Human Exposure to Radiation From
Licensed Material
During this reporting period, one
event at an NRC-licensed facility and
one event at an Agreement Statelicensed facility were significant enough
to be reported as abnormal occurrences
(AOs).
E:\FR\FM\08JNN1.SGM
08JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 108 (Monday, June 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27191-27192]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13298]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
[NRC-2008-0497]
NRC Enforcement Policy Revision
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
ACTION: Notice of availability of revised draft supplements and request
for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: On September 15, 2008 (73 FR 53286), the Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) published a notice of availability and request for
comments on its draft proposed revised Enforcement Policy (Enforcement
Policy). A corrected proposed revised Enforcement Policy was published
on October 16, 2008 (73 FR 61442). The public comment period for the
revised Enforcement Policy ended on November 14, 2008. The NRC is now
soliciting written comments from interested parties including public
interest groups, States, members of the public and the regulated
industry (i.e., reactor and materials licensees, vendors, and
contractors), on additional proposed revisions to Section 6.0,
Supplements-Violation Examples, of the proposed revised Enforcement
Policy. This Notice of Availability and request for comments apply only
to new proposed revisions to Section 6.0 of the proposed revised
Enforcement Policy.
DATES: Submit comments on or before July 8, 2009. Comments received
after this date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the
Commission is able to assure consideration only for comments received
on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: Comments will be made available to the public in their
entirety; personal information, such as your name, address, telephone
number, e-mail address, etc. will not be removed from your submission.
You may submit comments by any one of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov; search on
docket ID: NRC-2008-0497.
Mail Comments to: Michael T. Lesar, Chief, Rulemaking and
Directives Branch, Mail Stop: TWB-05-B01M, Division of Administrative
Services, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001.
You can access publicly available documents related to this notice
using the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: Documents related to this notice,
including public comments, are accessible at https://www.regulations.gov, by searching on docket ID: NRC-2008-0497.
NRC's Public Document Room (PDR): The public may examine and have
copied for a fee, publicly available documents at the NRC's PDR, Public
File Area O-1F21, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,
Rockville, Maryland.
NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS): The
revised draft Supplements of the proposed revised Enforcement Policy
are available electronically at the NRC's Electronic Reading Room at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html under ADAMS Accession Number
(ML091520156). From this site, the public can gain entry into ADAMS,
which provides text and image files of the NRC's public documents. In
addition, revised draft Supplements of the proposed revised Enforcement
[[Page 27192]]
Policy will be available at https://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/regulatory/enforcement/public-involvement.html. If you do not have Internet access
or if there are problems in accessing the documents located in ADAMS,
contact the PDR Reference staff at 1-800-397-4209, 301-415-4737 or by
e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Doug Starkey, Office of Enforcement,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555;
Doug.Starkey@nrc.gov, 301-415-3456.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
As discussed in the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION of the September 15,
2008 document (73 FR 53286), the NRC, in developing the proposed
revised Enforcement Policy, in many instances reworded, deleted, or
moved (i.e., moved to the NRC Enforcement Manual, an NRC staff guidance
document) some of the information in the current Enforcement Policy.
(See the table at ML083050133 for a listing of subject matter in the
current Enforcement Policy which was not carried over into the proposed
revised Enforcement Policy.) For example, Section 6.0, Supplements-
Violation Examples, of the proposed revised Enforcement Policy was
significantly reorganized, reworded, and contained much less detail
than the supplements in the current Enforcement Policy. In addition,
the NRC had also planned to add detailed violation examples to the
Enforcement Manual to serve as further guidance to NRC inspectors.
However, based on public comments received in response to the September
and October 2008 publications of the proposed revised Enforcement
Policy, the NRC has reconsidered its original plan to have abbreviated
violation examples in the revised Enforcement Policy and detailed
violation examples in the Enforcement Manual. The NRC now proposes to
continue its past practice of providing violation example supplements
in the Enforcement Policy. These revised supplements are intended to
cover, in more detail than originally planned, a broad range of
circumstances in each of the four severity levels in each of 14
activity areas. It should be noted that the supplements in Section 6.0
of the proposed revised Enforcement Policy are not intended to address
every possible circumstance and are therefore neither exhaustive nor
controlling.
Because the revised violation supplements that are being proposed
for the revised Enforcement Policy have, in some instances, been
changed significantly from those previously published, the NRC is
providing an opportunity for public comments on the proposed revised
supplements.
The NRC maintains the Enforcement Policy on its Web site at https://www.nrc.gov; select Public Meetings and Involvement, Enforcement, and
then Enforcement Policy.
Procedural Requirements:
Paperwork Reduction Act
This policy statement does not contain new or amended information
collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing requirements were approved by the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB), approval number 3150-0136.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection
requirement unless the requesting document displays a currently valid
OMB control number.
Congressional Review Act
In accordance with the Congressional Review Act of 1996, the NRC
has determined that this action is not a major rule and has verified
this determination with the Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
Dated at Rockville, MD, this 1st day of June 2009.
Cynthia A. Carpenter,
Director, Office of Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E9-13298 Filed 6-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P