Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; 2010-2012 American Community Survey Methods Panel Testing, 27013-27014 [E9-13130]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 107 / Friday, June 5, 2009 / Notices
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: June 2, 2009.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–13153 Filed 6–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Proposed Information Collection;
Comment Request; 2010–2012
American Community Survey Methods
Panel Testing
AGENCY: U.S. Census Bureau,
Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The Department of
Commerce, as part of its continuing
effort to reduce paperwork and
respondent burden, invites the general
public and other Federal agencies to
take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information
collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: To ensure consideration, written
comments must be submitted on or
before August 4, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments
to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer,
Department of Commerce, Room 7845,
14th and Constitution Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20230 (or via the
Internet at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection
instrument(s) and instructions should
be directed to Susan Schechter, U.S.
Census Bureau, American Community
Survey Office, Washington, DC 20233,
by FAX to (301) 763–8620 or e-mail at
susan.schechter.bortner@census.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
erowe on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
I. Abstract
Given the rapid demographic changes
experienced in recent years and the
strong expectation that such changes
will continue and accelerate, the oncea-decade data collection approach of a
census is no longer acceptable as a
source for the housing and socioeconomic data collected on the census
long form. To meet the needs and
expectations of the country, the Census
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:06 Jun 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
Bureau developed the American
Community Survey (ACS). This survey
collects detailed socioeconomic data
every month and provides tabulations of
these data on a yearly basis. The ACS
allows the Census Bureau to provide
more timely and relevant housing and
socio-economic data while also
reducing operational risks in the census
by eliminating the long form historically
given to one in every six addresses.
Full implementation of the ACS
includes an annual sample of
approximately three million residential
addresses a year in the 50 States and the
District of Columbia, and another 36,000
addresses in Puerto Rico. A sample this
large allows for annual production and
release of single-year estimates for areas
with a population of 65,000 or more.
Lower levels of geography require
aggregates of three and five years’ worth
of data in order to produce estimates of
comparable quality to the census long
form. An ongoing data collection effort
with an annual sample of this
magnitude requires that the ACS
continue research, testing and
evaluations aimed at improving overall
ACS data quality, achieving survey cost
efficiencies, and developing and
improving ACS questionnaire content
and related data collection materials.
The ACS Methods Panel during the
2010–2012 period may include testing
methods for increasing survey and
operational efficiencies; alternative
methods or procedures may be
developed and evaluated that could
potentially reduce the overall survey
cost, lessen respondent burden, and
improve response rates. At this time,
specific plans are in place to propose
three methods panel tests: a content
reinterview study, 2010 ACS Content
Test, and an Internet Test. Since the
ACS Methods Panel is designed to
address emerging issues, we may
conduct additional testing as needed.
Testing would focus on methods for
reducing data collection costs or testing
new questions that have an urgent need
to be included on the ACS.
During the decennial census year, a
content reinterview study (CRS) was
conducted in conjunction with the long
form, which the ACS now replaces. The
decennial CRS was an evaluation of the
quality of the data collected in the
census, focusing on response bias and
simple response variance (reliability).
The Census Bureau proposes to design
and implement a continuous CRS to
look at the current ACS production
questions on an ongoing basis. This will
allow for the identification of problems
with reliability. Results from the CRS
will provide data users with concrete
data quality measures (such as
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
27013
reliability or bias measures) for each
ACS item.
The ACS CRS will allow the Census
Bureau to continuously monitor the data
quality of the ACS and identify
questions that are currently unreliable
or that may become unreliable due to
changes in the survey climate (e.g.,
changes in policy that change the
definition of what the ACS is trying to
measure). The results from the CRS,
generated on a yearly basis, would
identify which questions require
modifications and future testing via a
content test, thus providing a more
scientific approach to determining the
need for content testing of current ACS
items. The CRS will be conducted by
telephone only with a small sample of
cases that responded during production.
Second, in response to Federal
agencies’ requests for new and revised
ACS questions, the Census Bureau plans
to conduct the 2010 ACS Content Test.
Changes to the current ACS content and
the addition of new content were
identified through the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
Interagency Committee for the ACS and
through recent or anticipated legislative
action. The primary objective of the
ACS 2010 Content Test is to test
whether changes to question wording,
response categories, and redefinition of
underlying constructs improve the
quality of data collected. The Census
Bureau proposes to evaluate changes to
the questions by comparing the revised
questions to the current ACS questions,
or for new questions, to compare the
performance of question versions to
each other as well as to other wellknown sources of such information. The
proposed topics for content testing are
new questions to measure computer and
Internet access and usage, as well as
parental place of birth and revisions to
veteran’s identification and period of
service, cash public assistance, wages
income and property income, and the
Food Stamps program name.
A third test, the ACS Internet Test, is
planned to determine the best methods
for informing sample households about
an ACS Internet response option and
encouraging them to respond. By
offering an Internet response option in
the ACS, the Census Bureau is taking
further steps to comply with the e-gov
initiative and potentially reduce data
collection costs. The objectives of the
Internet Test include: potential
improvement in self-response rates;
potential cost savings if we can change
the distribution of responses by mode
(i.e., obtain more responses by Internet);
and potential improvement in data
quality including a potential reduction
in item nonresponse.
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
27014
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 107 / Friday, June 5, 2009 / Notices
erowe on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES
II. Method of Collection
Continuous ACS CRS—Cases that
responded to production ACS from all
three ACS response modes (mail,
telephone, and personal visit) will be
included. Reinterview modules
containing a subset of the questions will
be created so that the entire ACS
questionnaire can be tested over several
months. Each question set or module of
the CRS will require multiple data
collection months to provide enough
sample for analysis purposes.
Reinterviews will be conducted within
2 to 4 weeks of the original data
collection. It is important that the
reinterview is close enough timing-wise
to the original data collection to
minimize the possibility of changes in
what is being measured, but far enough
away so respondents do not exactly
remember previous responses.
2010 Content Test—The field test
portion of the ACS content test will be
largely based on the data collection
methods currently used in the
production ACS. Sampled addresses
will be mailed a pre-notice letter, a selfadministered paper questionnaire, and a
reminder postcard. Households that do
not return their initial questionnaire in
a timely manner will also be mailed a
replacement questionnaire. For
households that do not return their
mailed questionnaire, we will attempt to
collect their data through Computer
Assisted Telephone Interviewing or
Computer Assisted Personal
Interviewing.
There will also be a Content Followup reinterview as part of the content
test. That is, we will attempt a followup CATI reinterview with all
households that responded in the field
test and for whom we have a telephone
number. This reinterview will focus on
the particular questions that we are
evaluating in the field test, and will not
include every question asked in the
original interview.
Internet Test—Currently, the ACS and
the Puerto Rico Community Survey
(PRCS) collect data using three modes:
mailout/mailback of a paper
questionnaire, telephone, and personal
visit. In the proposed test we will offer
a fourth response mode—an Internet
self-response option—to respondents in
the ACS and the PRCS during the mail
data collection phase.
Different strategies will be used to
inform respondents of the Internet
response option. In all strategies, the
URL for the secure ACS Internet site and
instructions for completing the survey
online will be provided to respondents
by mail.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:06 Jun 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
The Census Bureau plans to design
four versions of the ACS Internet
instrument—an English version and a
Spanish version for both the ACS and
the PRCS. Households that do not
respond by mail or Internet will be
contacted for a telephone interview,
similar to ACS production, since a voice
message could encourage a household to
respond by mail or Internet. This test
will not include a personal visit
operation like ACS production.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0607–0936.
Form Number: ACS–1, ACS1(SP),
ACS–1(PR), ACS–1(PR)SP, ACS
CATI(HU), and ACS RI(HU).
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals and
households.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
We plan to contact the following
number of respondents: Content
Reinterview Study, 71,520 responding
addresses per year; 2010 Content Test,
70,000 residential addresses during the
field test and 40,000 responding
addresses during the content follow-up
conducted by telephone; Internet Test,
90,000 residential addresses. Other
potential content test: 70,000 residential
addresses during the field test and
40,000 responding addresses during the
content follow-up conducted by
telephone. Other potential test of new
methods: 30,000 residential addresses.
Estimated Time per Response:
Estimates are: Content Test field test, 38
minutes, content test follow-up, 15
minutes; Internet Test, 38 minutes;
Content Reinterview Study, 15 minutes;
other potential test of new methods, 38
minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden
Hours: 67,515.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: Except
for their time, there is no cost to
respondents.
Respondent Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C.
Section 182.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to
this notice will be summarized and/or
included in the request for OMB
approval of this information collection;
they also will become a matter of public
record.
Dated: June 2, 2009.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief
Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–13130 Filed 6–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510–07–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–427–818]
Notice of Rescission of Antidumping
Duty Administrative Reviews: Low
Enriched Uranium From France
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
EFFECTIVE DATE: June 5, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Myrna Lobo or Justin Neuman, Office of
AD/CVD Enforcement VI, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–2371 or (202) 482–
0486, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On December 21, 2001, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) published the antidumping
duty order on low enriched uranium
from France. See Notice of Amended
Final Determination of Sales at Less
Than Fair Value and Antidumping Duty
Order: Low Enriched Uranium From
France, 67 FR 6680 (February 13, 2002).
On February 4, 2009, the Department
published in the Federal Register a
notice of opportunity to request an
administrative review of the
antidumping order on low enriched
uranium from France for the period of
February 1, 2008 through January 31,
2009. See Antidumping or
Countervailing Duty Order, Finding, or
Suspended Investigation; Opportunity
to Request Administrative Review, 74
FR 6013 (February 4, 2009). On
February 19, 2009, USEC timely
requested that the Department conduct
an administrative review of Eurodif for
the period of February 1, 2008 through
January 31, 2009. USEC was the only
party to request this administrative
E:\FR\FM\05JNN1.SGM
05JNN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 107 (Friday, June 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 27013-27014]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-13130]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Census Bureau
Proposed Information Collection; Comment Request; 2010-2012
American Community Survey Methods Panel Testing
AGENCY: U.S. Census Bureau, Commerce.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce, as part of its continuing effort
to reduce paperwork and respondent burden, invites the general public
and other Federal agencies to take this opportunity to comment on
proposed and/or continuing information collections, as required by the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13 (44 U.S.C.
3506(c)(2)(A)).
DATES: To ensure consideration, written comments must be submitted on
or before August 4, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Direct all written comments to Diana Hynek, Departmental
Paperwork Clearance Officer, Department of Commerce, Room 7845, 14th
and Constitution Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20230 (or via the Internet
at dHynek@doc.gov).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information or
copies of the information collection instrument(s) and instructions
should be directed to Susan Schechter, U.S. Census Bureau, American
Community Survey Office, Washington, DC 20233, by FAX to (301) 763-8620
or e-mail at susan.schechter.bortner@census.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Abstract
Given the rapid demographic changes experienced in recent years and
the strong expectation that such changes will continue and accelerate,
the once-a-decade data collection approach of a census is no longer
acceptable as a source for the housing and socio-economic data
collected on the census long form. To meet the needs and expectations
of the country, the Census Bureau developed the American Community
Survey (ACS). This survey collects detailed socioeconomic data every
month and provides tabulations of these data on a yearly basis. The ACS
allows the Census Bureau to provide more timely and relevant housing
and socio-economic data while also reducing operational risks in the
census by eliminating the long form historically given to one in every
six addresses.
Full implementation of the ACS includes an annual sample of
approximately three million residential addresses a year in the 50
States and the District of Columbia, and another 36,000 addresses in
Puerto Rico. A sample this large allows for annual production and
release of single-year estimates for areas with a population of 65,000
or more. Lower levels of geography require aggregates of three and five
years' worth of data in order to produce estimates of comparable
quality to the census long form. An ongoing data collection effort with
an annual sample of this magnitude requires that the ACS continue
research, testing and evaluations aimed at improving overall ACS data
quality, achieving survey cost efficiencies, and developing and
improving ACS questionnaire content and related data collection
materials. The ACS Methods Panel during the 2010-2012 period may
include testing methods for increasing survey and operational
efficiencies; alternative methods or procedures may be developed and
evaluated that could potentially reduce the overall survey cost, lessen
respondent burden, and improve response rates. At this time, specific
plans are in place to propose three methods panel tests: a content
reinterview study, 2010 ACS Content Test, and an Internet Test. Since
the ACS Methods Panel is designed to address emerging issues, we may
conduct additional testing as needed. Testing would focus on methods
for reducing data collection costs or testing new questions that have
an urgent need to be included on the ACS.
During the decennial census year, a content reinterview study (CRS)
was conducted in conjunction with the long form, which the ACS now
replaces. The decennial CRS was an evaluation of the quality of the
data collected in the census, focusing on response bias and simple
response variance (reliability). The Census Bureau proposes to design
and implement a continuous CRS to look at the current ACS production
questions on an ongoing basis. This will allow for the identification
of problems with reliability. Results from the CRS will provide data
users with concrete data quality measures (such as reliability or bias
measures) for each ACS item.
The ACS CRS will allow the Census Bureau to continuously monitor
the data quality of the ACS and identify questions that are currently
unreliable or that may become unreliable due to changes in the survey
climate (e.g., changes in policy that change the definition of what the
ACS is trying to measure). The results from the CRS, generated on a
yearly basis, would identify which questions require modifications and
future testing via a content test, thus providing a more scientific
approach to determining the need for content testing of current ACS
items. The CRS will be conducted by telephone only with a small sample
of cases that responded during production.
Second, in response to Federal agencies' requests for new and
revised ACS questions, the Census Bureau plans to conduct the 2010 ACS
Content Test. Changes to the current ACS content and the addition of
new content were identified through the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Interagency Committee for the ACS and through recent or
anticipated legislative action. The primary objective of the ACS 2010
Content Test is to test whether changes to question wording, response
categories, and redefinition of underlying constructs improve the
quality of data collected. The Census Bureau proposes to evaluate
changes to the questions by comparing the revised questions to the
current ACS questions, or for new questions, to compare the performance
of question versions to each other as well as to other well-known
sources of such information. The proposed topics for content testing
are new questions to measure computer and Internet access and usage, as
well as parental place of birth and revisions to veteran's
identification and period of service, cash public assistance, wages
income and property income, and the Food Stamps program name.
A third test, the ACS Internet Test, is planned to determine the
best methods for informing sample households about an ACS Internet
response option and encouraging them to respond. By offering an
Internet response option in the ACS, the Census Bureau is taking
further steps to comply with the e-gov initiative and potentially
reduce data collection costs. The objectives of the Internet Test
include: potential improvement in self-response rates; potential cost
savings if we can change the distribution of responses by mode (i.e.,
obtain more responses by Internet); and potential improvement in data
quality including a potential reduction in item nonresponse.
[[Page 27014]]
II. Method of Collection
Continuous ACS CRS--Cases that responded to production ACS from all
three ACS response modes (mail, telephone, and personal visit) will be
included. Reinterview modules containing a subset of the questions will
be created so that the entire ACS questionnaire can be tested over
several months. Each question set or module of the CRS will require
multiple data collection months to provide enough sample for analysis
purposes. Reinterviews will be conducted within 2 to 4 weeks of the
original data collection. It is important that the reinterview is close
enough timing-wise to the original data collection to minimize the
possibility of changes in what is being measured, but far enough away
so respondents do not exactly remember previous responses.
2010 Content Test--The field test portion of the ACS content test
will be largely based on the data collection methods currently used in
the production ACS. Sampled addresses will be mailed a pre-notice
letter, a self-administered paper questionnaire, and a reminder
postcard. Households that do not return their initial questionnaire in
a timely manner will also be mailed a replacement questionnaire. For
households that do not return their mailed questionnaire, we will
attempt to collect their data through Computer Assisted Telephone
Interviewing or Computer Assisted Personal Interviewing.
There will also be a Content Follow-up reinterview as part of the
content test. That is, we will attempt a follow-up CATI reinterview
with all households that responded in the field test and for whom we
have a telephone number. This reinterview will focus on the particular
questions that we are evaluating in the field test, and will not
include every question asked in the original interview.
Internet Test--Currently, the ACS and the Puerto Rico Community
Survey (PRCS) collect data using three modes: mailout/mailback of a
paper questionnaire, telephone, and personal visit. In the proposed
test we will offer a fourth response mode--an Internet self-response
option--to respondents in the ACS and the PRCS during the mail data
collection phase.
Different strategies will be used to inform respondents of the
Internet response option. In all strategies, the URL for the secure ACS
Internet site and instructions for completing the survey online will be
provided to respondents by mail.
The Census Bureau plans to design four versions of the ACS Internet
instrument--an English version and a Spanish version for both the ACS
and the PRCS. Households that do not respond by mail or Internet will
be contacted for a telephone interview, similar to ACS production,
since a voice message could encourage a household to respond by mail or
Internet. This test will not include a personal visit operation like
ACS production.
III. Data
OMB Control Number: 0607-0936.
Form Number: ACS-1, ACS1(SP), ACS-1(PR), ACS-1(PR)SP, ACS CATI(HU),
and ACS RI(HU).
Type of Review: Regular submission.
Affected Public: Individuals and households.
Estimated Number of Respondents: We plan to contact the following
number of respondents: Content Reinterview Study, 71,520 responding
addresses per year; 2010 Content Test, 70,000 residential addresses
during the field test and 40,000 responding addresses during the
content follow-up conducted by telephone; Internet Test, 90,000
residential addresses. Other potential content test: 70,000 residential
addresses during the field test and 40,000 responding addresses during
the content follow-up conducted by telephone. Other potential test of
new methods: 30,000 residential addresses.
Estimated Time per Response: Estimates are: Content Test field
test, 38 minutes, content test follow-up, 15 minutes; Internet Test, 38
minutes; Content Reinterview Study, 15 minutes; other potential test of
new methods, 38 minutes.
Estimated Total Annual Burden Hours: 67,515.
Estimated Total Annual Cost: Except for their time, there is no
cost to respondents.
Respondent Obligation: Mandatory.
Legal Authority: Title 13 U.S.C. Section 182.
IV. Request for Comments
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of
the agency, including whether the information shall have practical
utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the burden
(including hours and cost) of the proposed collection of information;
(c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on respondents, including through the use of
automated collection techniques or other forms of information
technology.
Comments submitted in response to this notice will be summarized
and/or included in the request for OMB approval of this information
collection; they also will become a matter of public record.
Dated: June 2, 2009.
Glenna Mickelson,
Management Analyst, Office of the Chief Information Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-13130 Filed 6-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-07-P