Safety Zone; Sea World June Fireworks; Mission Bay, San Diego, CA, 26782-26785 [E9-12980]
Download as PDF
26782
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
[FR Doc. E9–12991 Filed 6–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION
17 CFR Parts 239 and 274
[Release Nos. 33–8998A; IC–28584A; File
No. S7–28–07]
RIN 3235–AJ44
Enhanced Disclosure and New
Prospectus Delivery Option for
Registered Open-End Management
Investment Companies
AGENCY: Securities and Exchange
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
SUMMARY: In connection with rules
adopted in Release No. 33–8998
(January 13, 2009), which appeared in
the Federal Register on January 26,
2009 (74 FR 4546), the Securities and
Exchange Commission is making
technical corrections to Form N–1A and
Form N–4. Specifically, the Commission
is correcting certain cross-references
appearing in each Form and correcting
a citation appearing in Form N–1A. The
citation being corrected was originally
adopted in its incorrect form in Release
No. IC–23064 (Mar. 13, 1998), which
appeared in the Federal Register on
March 23, 1998 (63 FR 13916).
DATES: Effective Date: June 4, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kieran G. Brown, Senior Counsel, Office
of Disclosure Regulation, at (202) 551–
6784, Division of Investment
Management, Securities and Exchange
Commission, 100 F Street, NE.,
Washington, DC 20549–5720.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Commission is making the following
corrections to Release No. 33–8998
(January 13, 2009), which was
published in FR Doc E9–1035 appearing
on page 4546 in the Federal Register on
January 26, 2009:
Note: The text of the form does not, and
these amendments will not, appear in the
Code of Federal Regulations.
1. On page 4588, second column,
amendment 13, paragraph m.ii.,
beginning on line four, revise the
reference ‘‘Items 17(d) and 22(b)’’ to
read ‘‘Items 17(d) and 23(b)’’.
2. On page 4588, second column,
amendment 13, paragraph m.iii., on the
second line, revise ‘‘reference’’ to read
‘‘references’’, and on the third line,
revise the reference ‘‘Item 22(a)’’ to read
‘‘Item 23(a)’’.
3. On page 4593, second column, add
amendment 13(a) to read as follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:50 Jun 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
13(a). Form N–1A (referenced in
§§ 239.15A and 274.11A) is amended
by:
a. In the General Instructions, revising
the citation ‘‘[15 U.S.C. 80a–24f–2]’’ in
paragraph B.3. to read ‘‘[15 U.S.C. 80a–
24(f)]’’; and
b. In newly redesignated Item 17(c)(2),
revising the reference ‘‘paragraph (d)(1)’’
to read ‘‘paragraph (c)(1)’’.
4. On page 4593, second column,
amendment 14, beginning on the fourth
line and continuing on to the third
column, revise the reference ‘‘Item
27(b)(ii) of Form N–1A’’ to read ‘‘Item
26(b)(4) of Form N–1A’’; in the third
column on the third line, revise the
reference ‘‘Item 27(b)(ii) equation’’ to
read ‘‘Item 26(b)(4) equation’’; and in
the third column on the fourth line,
revise the reference ‘‘Item 20(b)(ii)’’ to
read ‘‘Item 21(b)(ii)’’.
Dated: May 28, 2009.
Elizabeth M. Murphy,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9–12956 Filed 6–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8010–01–P
(diclofenac sodium) topical cream and
NADA 141–174 for ACAREXX
(ivermectin) otic suspension to
Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc.,
2621 North Belt Highway, St. Joseph,
MO 64506–2002. Accordingly, the
regulations are amended in 21 CFR
524.590 and 524.1195 to reflect the
change of sponsorship.
This rule does not meet the definition
of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because
it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’
Therefore, it is not subject to the
congressional review requirements in 5
U.S.C. 801–808.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 524
Animal drugs.
Therefore, under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under
authority delegated to the Commissioner
of Food and Drugs and redelegated to
the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21
CFR part 524 is amended as follows:
■
PART 524—OPHTHALMIC AND
TOPICAL DOSAGE FORM NEW
ANIMAL DRUGS
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 524 continues to read as follows:
■
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
Ophthalmic and Topical Dosage Form
New Animal Drugs; Change of
Sponsor; Diclofenac; Ivermectin Otic
Suspension
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
Final rule.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is amending the
animal drug regulations to reflect a
change of sponsor for diclofenac sodium
cream and ivermectin otic suspension
from IDEXX Pharmaceuticals, Inc., to
Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc.
DATES: This rule is effective June 4,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David R. Newkirk, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–100), Food and Drug
Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–8307,
e-mail: david.newkirk@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: IDEXX
Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 7009 Albert Pick
Rd., Greensboro, NC 27409, has
informed FDA that it has transferred
ownership of, and all rights and interest
in, NADA 141–186 for SURPASS
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
[Amended]
2. In paragraph (b) of § 524.590,
remove ‘‘065274’’ and in its place add
‘‘000010’’.
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0665]
ACTION:
§ 524.590
■
21 CFR Part 524
AGENCY:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b.
Sfmt 4700
§ 524.1195
[Amended]
3. In paragraph (b) of § 524.1195,
remove ‘‘065274’’ and in its place add
‘‘000010’’.
■
Dated: May 27, 2009.
Bernadette Dunham,
Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine.
[FR Doc. E9–13015 Filed 6–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0267]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Sea World June
Fireworks; Mission Bay, San Diego, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone, on the
navigable waters of Mission Bay in
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
support of the Sea World June Nights
Fireworks. This safety zone is necessary
to provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators,
participating vessels, and other vessels
and users of the waterway. Persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or anchoring
within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or
his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 p.m.
on June 5, 2009 to 10 p.m. June 7, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2009–
0267 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, selecting
the Advanced Docket Search option on
the right side of the screen, inserting
USCG–2009–0267 in the Docket ID box,
pressing Enter, and then clicking on the
item in the Docket ID column. They are
also available for inspection or copying
two locations: the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays,
and the Coast Guard Sector San Diego,
2710 N. Harbor Drive, San Diego, CA
92101–1064 between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail, Petty Officer Shane
Jackson, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego, CA;
telephone (619) 278–7262, e-mail
Shane.E.Jackson@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
immediate action is necessary to ensure
the safety of vessels, spectators,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:50 Jun 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
participants, and others in the vicinity
of the marine event on the dates and
times this rule will be in effect and
delay would be contrary to the public
interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register because delaying the effective
date would be contrary to the public
interest, since immediate action is
needed to ensure the public’s safety.
Background and Purpose
Sea World is sponsoring the Sea
World June Fireworks, which will
include a fireworks presentation from a
barge in Mission Bay. The safety zone
will be a 600 foot radius around the
barge in approximate position 32°46′03″
N, 117°13′11″ W. This temporary safety
zone is necessary to provide for the
safety of the crew, spectators,
participants, and other vessels and users
of the waterway.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone that will be enforced from 8
p.m. to 10 p.m. on June 5, 2009 through
June 7, 2009. The limits of the safety
zone will be a 600 foot radius around
the barge in approximate position
32°46′03″ N, 117°13′11″ W. The safety
zone is necessary to provide for the
safety of the crew, spectators,
participants, and other vessels and users
of the waterway. Persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring within this safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port, or his designated
representative.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the size
and location of the safety zone.
Commercial vessels will not be
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26783
hindered by the safety zone.
Recreational vessels will not be allowed
to transit through the designated safety
zone during the specified times.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons: Vessel traffic can
pass safely around the safety zone.
Before the effective period, the Coast
Guard will publish a local notice to
mariners (LNM) and will issue
broadcast notice to mariners (BNM)
alerts via marine channel 16 VHF before
the safety zone is enforced.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
26784
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:50 Jun 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation. This rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone around a fireworks barge. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
■
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Public Law 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064;
Department of Homeland Security Delegation
No. 0170.1.
2. Add new temporary zone
§ 165.T11–187 to read as follows:
■
§ 165.T11–187 Safety zone; Sea World
June Fireworks; Mission Bay, San Diego,
California.
(a) Location. The limits of the safety
zone will include a 600 foot radius
around the barge in approximate
position 32°46′03″ N, 117°13′11″ W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m.
on June 5, 2009 through June 7, 2009.
If the event concludes prior to the
scheduled termination time, the Captain
of the Port will cease enforcement of
this safety zone and will announce that
fact via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
designated representative, means any
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, state, and federal law
enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the
Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of San Diego or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to
transit through the safety zone may
request authorization to do so from the
Sector San Diego Command Center. The
Command Center may be contacted on
VHF–FM Channel 16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the
designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: May 18, 2009.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. E9–12980 Filed 6–3–09; 8:45 am]
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
On April 20, 2009 we published a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
entitled ‘‘Safety zone; Sea World 4th of
July Fireworks Display; Mission Bay,
San Diego, California’’ in the Federal
Register (74 FR 17926). We received no
comments on the proposed rule. No
public meeting was requested, and none
was held.
Regulatory Information
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0103]
Background and Purpose
RIN 1625–AA00
Fireworks & Stage FX Inc is
sponsoring the Sea World 4th of July
Fireworks Display, which will include a
fireworks presentation originating from
a land based firing site located at
approximately 32°46′17.20″ N,
117°13′24.72″ W. The safety zone will
encompass all navigable waters within
800 feet of the firing site. This safety
zone is necessary to provide for the
safety of the crew, spectators, and other
users and vessels of the waterway.
Safety Zone; Sea World 4th of July
Fireworks Display; Mission Bay, San
Diego, CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone on the
navigable waters of Mission Bay in
support of the Sea World 4th of July
Fireworks Display. This safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of
crew, spectators, and other users and
vessels of the waterway. Persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or anchoring
within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port or
his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 p.m.
on July 3, 2009 to 9:45 p.m. on July 5,
2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2009–0103 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, selecting the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, inserting USCG–
2009–0103 in the Docket ID box,
pressing Enter, and then clicking on the
item in the Docket ID column. This
material is also available for inspection
or copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Petty Officer Shane
Jackson, Waterways Management, Coast
Guard; telephone 619–278–7262, e-mail
Shane.E.Jackson@uscg.mil. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:50 Jun 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
This determination is based on the
size and location of the safety zone.
Commercial vessels will not be
hindered by the safety zone.
Recreational vessels will not be allowed
to transit through the designated safety
zone during the specified times.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
26785
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will affect the following
entities, some of which may be small
entities: the owners or operators of
vessels intending to transit or anchor in
a portion of Mission Bay from 8 p.m. to
9:45 p.m. on July 3, 2009 thru July 5,
2009.
This safety zone will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. The safety zone
will only be in effect for one hour and
45 minutes late in the evening. Before
the effective period, we will publish a
Local Notice to Mariners (LNM).
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
in the NPRM we offered to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so
that they could better evaluate its effects
on them and participate in the
rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 106 (Thursday, June 4, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26782-26785]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12980]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2009-0267]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Sea World June Fireworks; Mission Bay, San Diego, CA
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone, on the
navigable waters of Mission Bay in
[[Page 26783]]
support of the Sea World June Nights Fireworks. This safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of the participants, crew,
spectators, participating vessels, and other vessels and users of the
waterway. Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 8 p.m. on June 5, 2009 to 10 p.m.
June 7, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2009-0267 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, selecting the Advanced Docket
Search option on the right side of the screen, inserting USCG-2009-0267
in the Docket ID box, pressing Enter, and then clicking on the item in
the Docket ID column. They are also available for inspection or copying
two locations: the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department
of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, and the Coast Guard
Sector San Diego, 2710 N. Harbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92101-1064
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call or e-mail, Petty Officer Shane Jackson, Waterways
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego, CA; telephone (619) 278-
7262, e-mail Shane.E.Jackson@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing
the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations,
telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because immediate action is necessary to
ensure the safety of vessels, spectators, participants, and others in
the vicinity of the marine event on the dates and times this rule will
be in effect and delay would be contrary to the public interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register because delaying the effective date
would be contrary to the public interest, since immediate action is
needed to ensure the public's safety.
Background and Purpose
Sea World is sponsoring the Sea World June Fireworks, which will
include a fireworks presentation from a barge in Mission Bay. The
safety zone will be a 600 foot radius around the barge in approximate
position 32[deg]46'03'' N, 117[deg]13'11'' W. This temporary safety
zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the crew, spectators,
participants, and other vessels and users of the waterway.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone that will be enforced
from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m. on June 5, 2009 through June 7, 2009. The limits
of the safety zone will be a 600 foot radius around the barge in
approximate position 32[deg]46'03'' N, 117[deg]13'11'' W. The safety
zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the crew, spectators,
participants, and other vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port, or his designated representative.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. This determination is based
on the size and location of the safety zone. Commercial vessels will
not be hindered by the safety zone. Recreational vessels will not be
allowed to transit through the designated safety zone during the
specified times.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: Vessel
traffic can pass safely around the safety zone. Before the effective
period, the Coast Guard will publish a local notice to mariners (LNM)
and will issue broadcast notice to mariners (BNM) alerts via marine
channel 16 VHF before the safety zone is enforced.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
[[Page 26784]]
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one of a category of actions which
do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the
human environment. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-
1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction, from further environmental
documentation. This rule involves the establishment of a safety zone
around a fireworks barge. An environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where
indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Public Law 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add new temporary zone Sec. 165.T11-187 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-187 Safety zone; Sea World June Fireworks; Mission Bay,
San Diego, California.
(a) Location. The limits of the safety zone will include a 600 foot
radius around the barge in approximate position 32[deg]46[min]03[sec]
N, 117[deg]13[min]11[sec] W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 8 p.m.
to 10 p.m. on June 5, 2009 through June 7, 2009. If the event concludes
prior to the scheduled termination time, the Captain of the Port will
cease enforcement of this safety zone and will announce that fact via
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section:
designated representative, means any commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, and local, state, and federal law enforcement vessels who
have been authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port of San Diego or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to transit through the safety
zone may request authorization to do so from the Sector San Diego
Command Center. The Command Center may be contacted on VHF-FM Channel
16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other federal, state, or
local agencies.
[[Page 26785]]
Dated: May 18, 2009.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. E9-12980 Filed 6-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P