Drawbridge Operation Regulations; CSX Railroad, Trout River, Mile 0.9, Jacksonville, FL, 26820-26823 [E9-12979]
Download as PDF
26820
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, and
44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.17; 14 CFR 11.38
and 11.19.
The Proposed Special Conditions
Accordingly, the Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) proposes the
following special conditions as part of
the type certification basis for Cessna
Aircraft Company, model 525C (CJ4)
airplanes.
Cessna Aircraft Company, Model 525C
(CJ4) Lithium Ion Battery Installation
In lieu of the requirements of 14 CFR
part 23, § 23.1353(a) through (e), lithium
ion batteries and battery installations on
the Cessna Aircraft Company, model
525C (CJ4) airplane must be designed
and installed as follows:
(1) Safe cell temperatures and
pressures must be maintained during
any probable charging or discharging
condition, or during any failure of the
charging or battery monitoring system
not shown to be extremely remote. The
Li-ion battery installation must be
designed to preclude explosion or fire in
the event of those failures.
(2) Li-ion batteries must be designed
to preclude the occurrence of selfsustaining, uncontrolled increases in
temperature or pressure.
(3) No explosive or toxic gasses
emitted by any Li-ion battery in normal
operation or as the result of any failure
of the battery charging or monitoring
system, or battery installation not
shown to be extremely remote, may
accumulate in hazardous quantities
within the airplane.
(4) Li-ion batteries that contain
flammable fluids must comply with the
flammable fluid fire protection
requirements of 14 CFR part 23,
§ 23.863(a) through (d).
(5) No corrosive fluids or gasses that
may escape from any Li-ion battery may
damage surrounding airplane structure
or adjacent essential equipment.
(6) Each Li-ion battery installation
must have provisions to prevent any
hazardous effect on structure or
essential systems that may be caused by
the maximum amount of heat the
battery can generate during a short
circuit of the battery or of its individual
cells.
(7) Li-ion battery installations must
have a system to control the charging
rate of the battery automatically, so as
to prevent battery overheating or
overcharging, and
(i) A battery temperature sensing and
over-temperature warning system with a
means for automatically disconnecting
the battery from its charging source in
the event of an over-temperature
condition, or,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:50 Jun 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
(ii) A battery failure sensing and
warning system with a means for
automatically disconnecting the battery
from its charging source in the event of
battery failure.
(8) Any Li-ion battery installation
whose function is required for safe
operation of the airplane, must
incorporate a monitoring and warning
feature that will provide an indication
to the appropriate flight crewmembers,
whenever the capacity and SOC of the
batteries have fallen below levels
considered acceptable for dispatch of
the airplane.
(9) The Instructions for Continued
Airworthiness (ICAW) must contain
recommended manufacturers
maintenance and inspection
requirements to ensure that batteries,
including single cells, meet a safety
function level essential to the aircraft’s
continued airworthiness.
(i) The ICAW must contain operating
instructions and equipment limitations
in an installation maintenance manual.
(ii) The ICAW must contain
installation procedures and limitation in
a maintenance manual, sufficient to
ensure that cells or batteries, when
installed according to the installation
procedures, still meet safety functional
levels, essential to the aircraft’s
continued airworthiness. The limitation
must identify any unique aspects of the
installation.
(iii) The ICAW must contain
corrective maintenance procedures to
functionally check battery capacity at
manufacturers recommended inspection
intervals.
(iv) The ICAW must contain
scheduled servicing information to
replace batteries at manufacturers
recommended replacement time.
(v) The ICAW must contain
maintenance inspection requirements to
visually check for a battery and/or
charger degradation.
(10) Batteries in a rotating stock
(spares) that have experienced degraded
charge retention capability or other
damage due to prolonged storage must
be functionally checked at
manufacturers recommended inspection
intervals.
(11) System Safety Assessment
process should address the software and
complex hardware levels for the
sensing, monitoring and warning
systems, if these systems contain
complex devices. The functional hazard
assessment (FHA) for the system is
required based on the intended
functions described. The criticality of
the specific functions will be
determined by the safety assessment
process for compliance with 14 CFR
part 23, § 23.1309, and Advisory
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Circular 23.1309–1D contains
acceptable means for accomplishing this
requirement. For determining the failure
condition, the criticality of a function
will include the mitigating factors. The
failure conditions must address the loss
of function and improper operations.
These special conditions are not
intended to replace 14 CFR part 23,
§ 23.1353 in the certification basis of the
Cessna Aircraft Company, model 525C
(CJ4) airplanes. The proposed special
conditions would apply only to Li-ion
batteries and battery installations. The
battery requirements of 14 CFR part 23,
§ 23.1353 would remain in effect for
batteries and battery installations on the
Cessna Aircraft Company, model 525C
(CJ4) airplane that do not use Li-ion
chemistry.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on May 27,
2009.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–12994 Filed 6–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[USCG–2009–0249]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations;
CSX Railroad, Trout River, Mile 0.9,
Jacksonville, FL
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
change the regulations governing the
operation of the CSX Railroad Bridge
across the Trout River, mile 0.9,
Jacksonville, Florida. This proposed
rule would allow the bridge to operate
using an automated system, without an
onsite bridge tender. Currently, the
bridge is required to open on signal
from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m.; and from 10
p.m. until 6 a.m. The draw shall open
on signal if at least 12 hours notice is
given.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before August 3, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2009–0249 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these methods. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Mr. Barry Dragon,
Seventh Coast Guard District, Bridge
Branch, telephone number 305–415–
6743, e-mail barry.dragon@uscg.mil. If
you have questions on viewing or
submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2009–0249),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material Online (https://
www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment Online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand delivery, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a phone number in the body
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:50 Jun 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
of your document so that we can contact
you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment Online, go
to https://www.regulations.gov, select the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert ‘‘USCG–
2009–0249’’ in the Docket ID box, press
Enter, and then click on the balloon
shape in the Actions column. If you
submit your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit them by mail and
would like to know that they reached
the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period
and may change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, select the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert USCG–
2009–0249 in the Docket ID box, press
Enter, and then click on the item in the
Docket ID column. You may also visit
the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12–140 on the ground floor of
the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. We have an
agreement with the Department of
Transportation to use the Docket
Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of comments received into any of
our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review a Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one using one of the four methods
specified under ADDRESSES. Please
explain why one would be beneficial. If
we determine that one would aid this
rulemaking, we will hold one at a time
and place announced by a later notice
in the Federal Register.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26821
Background and Purpose
The CSX Railroad owner has
requested that the Coast Guard remove
the existing regulations governing the
operation of the CSX Railroad Bridge
over the Trout River and allow the
bridge to operate utilizing an automated
system. The request is made because
there are only four train transits per day,
which require short transit times. Under
the proposed rule, the bridge would
remain in the open position to vessel
traffic at all other times.
The CSX Railroad Bridge is located on
the Trout River, mile 0.9, Jacksonville,
Florida. The current regulation
governing the operation of the CSX
Railroad Bridge is published in 33 CFR
117.337 and requires the bridge to open
on signal from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m.; and
from 10 p.m. until 6 a.m. the draw shall
open on signal if at least 12 hours notice
is given.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to change
the operating regulations of the CSX
Railroad Bridge so that the bridge can
operate automatically. There are only
four train transits per day across this
bridge. The proposed action would
remove the requirement that a bridge
tender be present to open the bridge on
signal for vessel traffic. The bridge
would remain in the open position until
a train approaches to cross the bridge.
When a train approaches, the CSX
signal department shall send an
electronic signal to the bridge to order
the closure sequence to begin. The
bridge control system will activate a
series of scanners along the water level
to detect any marine traffic within the
bridge closure area. The bridge control
system will turn off the green channel
markers and turn on the red bridge
warning strobe lights and
simultaneously sound a signal, which
will last throughout the entire closing
period. The bridge shall remain closed
position to vessel traffic until the train
has sufficiently cleared the bridge area.
When the train has cleared, the bridge
control system shall again sound a
signal for the entire period the bridge is
opening. When the bridge is in the fully
open position, the red bridge warning
strobe lights shall turn off, and the green
channel marker lights will relight. The
bridge will remain in the open to vessel
traffic position until the next train
crossing. If at any time the scanners
detect a vessel within the bridge
structure, the opening/closing sequence
will automatically be halted until the
vessel clears the structure. Additional
strobe lighting shall be placed on the
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
26822
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules
structure to warn vessels of impending
closure.
Signs shall be posted on both sides of
the navigation channel indicating,
‘‘Caution; this bridge operates by remote
control.’’ A toll-free, CSX contact
telephone number shall be posted on
the signs for emergencies.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order. Vessel
traffic will be able to transit under the
bridge with the exception of the short
closure periods required for the trains to
transit over the bridge.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities. The proposed rule will affect
vessel traffic under the bridge and daily
train crossings over the bridge.
However, the proposed rule will not
change the number of times the bridge
will need to be in a closed position for
trains. Additionally, the bridge will
remain in the open to navigation
position at all other times for the benefit
of vessel traffic.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:50 Jun 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
Assistance for Small Entities
Protection of Children
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please consult Mr. Barry
Dragon, Seventh Coast Guard District,
Bridge Branch, telephone 305–415–
6743, e-mail barry.dragon@uscg.mil.
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for
Federalism under Executive Order
13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial
direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt
State law or impose a substantial direct
cost of compliance on them. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule will not
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 0023.1,
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment because it
simply promulgates the operating
regulations or procedures for
drawbridges. We seek any comments or
information that may lead to the
discovery of a significant environmental
impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Regulations
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117—DRAWBRIDGE
OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of
Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1; 33
CFR 1.05–1(g).
2. Revise § 117.337 as follows:
§ 117.337
Trout River.
The draw of the CSX Railroad Bridge
across the Trout River, mile 0.9 at
Jacksonville, operates as follows:
The bridge is not tender.
(a) The draw is normally in the fully
open position, displaying green lights to
indicate that vessels may pass.
(b) As a train approaches, provided
the scanners do not detect a vessel
under the draw, the lights change to
flashing red and a horn continuously
sounds while the draw closes. The draw
remains closed until the train passes.
(c) After the train clears the bridge,
the lights continue to flash red and the
horn again continuously sounds while
the draw opens, until the draw is fully
open and the lights return to green.
Dated: May 12, 2009.
R.S. Branham,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander,
Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E9–12979 Filed 6–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:50 Jun 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0342]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zones; Annual Events
Requiring Safety Zones in the Captain
of the Port Lake Michigan Zone
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR Part 165 to amend the
rules that restrict vessels from portions
of water areas during events that pose a
hazard to public safety. The safety zones
proposed in this rulemaking are
necessary to protect spectators,
participants, and vessels from the
hazards associated with fireworks
displays, air shows, and other events.
DATES: Comments and related materials
must reach the Coast Guard on or before
July 6, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG–2009–0342 to the Docket
Management Facility at the U.S.
Department of Transportation. To avoid
duplication, please use only one of the
following methods:
(1) Online: https://
www.regulations.gov.
(2) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(3) Hand Delivery: Room W12–140 on
the Ground Floor of the West Building,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202–366–9329.
(4) Fax: 202–493–2251.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call BM2 Adam Kraft, Prevention
Department, Coast Guard Sector Lake
Michigan, Milwaukee, WI at (414) 747–
7154. If you have questions on viewing
or submitting material to the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26823
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2009–0342),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail, or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand deliver, or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, select the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert ‘‘USCG–
2009–0342’’ in the Docket ID box, press
Enter, and then click on the balloon
shape in the Actions column. If you
submit your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit comments by mail
and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, select the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert USCG–
2009–0342 in the Docket ID box, press
Enter, and then click on the item in the
Docket ID column. You may also visit
the Docket Management Facility in
Room W12–140 on the ground floor of
the Department of Transportation West
Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
E:\FR\FM\04JNP1.SGM
04JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 106 (Thursday, June 4, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26820-26823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12979]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[USCG-2009-0249]
RIN 1625-AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulations; CSX Railroad, Trout River, Mile
0.9, Jacksonville, FL
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes to change the regulations governing
the operation of the CSX Railroad Bridge across the Trout River, mile
0.9, Jacksonville, Florida. This proposed rule would allow the bridge
to operate using an automated system, without an onsite bridge tender.
Currently, the bridge is required to open on signal from 6 a.m. until
10 p.m.; and from 10 p.m. until 6 a.m. The draw shall open on signal if
at least 12 hours notice is given.
DATES: Comments and related material must be received by the Coast
Guard on or before August 3, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by docket number USCG-
2009-0249 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
[[Page 26821]]
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand Delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only one of these methods. See the
``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call or e-mail Mr. Barry Dragon, Seventh Coast Guard District,
Bridge Branch, telephone number 305-415-6743, e-mail
barry.dragon@uscg.mil. If you have questions on viewing or submitting
material to the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket
Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2009-0249), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
Online (https://www.regulations.gov), or by fax, mail or hand delivery,
but please use only one of these means. If you submit a comment Online
via https://www.regulations.gov, it will be considered received by the
Coast Guard when you successfully transmit the comment. If you fax,
hand delivery, or mail your comment, it will be considered as having
been received by the Coast Guard when it is received at the Docket
Management Facility. We recommend that you include your name and a
mailing address, an e-mail address, or a phone number in the body of
your document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding
your submission.
To submit your comment Online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the
screen, insert ``USCG-2009-0249'' in the Docket ID box, press Enter,
and then click on the balloon shape in the Actions column. If you
submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the
screen, insert USCG-2009-0249 in the Docket ID box, press Enter, and
then click on the item in the Docket ID column. You may also visit the
Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground floor of the
Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New Jersey Avenue,
SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. We have an agreement with the
Department of Transportation to use the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review a Privacy Act notice
regarding our public dockets in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one using one of the four methods specified under
ADDRESSES. Please explain why one would be beneficial. If we determine
that one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and
place announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
The CSX Railroad owner has requested that the Coast Guard remove
the existing regulations governing the operation of the CSX Railroad
Bridge over the Trout River and allow the bridge to operate utilizing
an automated system. The request is made because there are only four
train transits per day, which require short transit times. Under the
proposed rule, the bridge would remain in the open position to vessel
traffic at all other times.
The CSX Railroad Bridge is located on the Trout River, mile 0.9,
Jacksonville, Florida. The current regulation governing the operation
of the CSX Railroad Bridge is published in 33 CFR 117.337 and requires
the bridge to open on signal from 6 a.m. until 10 p.m.; and from 10
p.m. until 6 a.m. the draw shall open on signal if at least 12 hours
notice is given.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes to change the operating regulations of the
CSX Railroad Bridge so that the bridge can operate automatically. There
are only four train transits per day across this bridge. The proposed
action would remove the requirement that a bridge tender be present to
open the bridge on signal for vessel traffic. The bridge would remain
in the open position until a train approaches to cross the bridge. When
a train approaches, the CSX signal department shall send an electronic
signal to the bridge to order the closure sequence to begin. The bridge
control system will activate a series of scanners along the water level
to detect any marine traffic within the bridge closure area. The bridge
control system will turn off the green channel markers and turn on the
red bridge warning strobe lights and simultaneously sound a signal,
which will last throughout the entire closing period. The bridge shall
remain closed position to vessel traffic until the train has
sufficiently cleared the bridge area. When the train has cleared, the
bridge control system shall again sound a signal for the entire period
the bridge is opening. When the bridge is in the fully open position,
the red bridge warning strobe lights shall turn off, and the green
channel marker lights will relight. The bridge will remain in the open
to vessel traffic position until the next train crossing. If at any
time the scanners detect a vessel within the bridge structure, the
opening/closing sequence will automatically be halted until the vessel
clears the structure. Additional strobe lighting shall be placed on the
[[Page 26822]]
structure to warn vessels of impending closure.
Signs shall be posted on both sides of the navigation channel
indicating, ``Caution; this bridge operates by remote control.'' A
toll-free, CSX contact telephone number shall be posted on the signs
for emergencies.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. Vessel traffic will be
able to transit under the bridge with the exception of the short
closure periods required for the trains to transit over the bridge.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities. The proposed rule will affect vessel traffic
under the bridge and daily train crossings over the bridge. However,
the proposed rule will not change the number of times the bridge will
need to be in a closed position for trains. Additionally, the bridge
will remain in the open to navigation position at all other times for
the benefit of vessel traffic.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please consult Mr. Barry Dragon, Seventh Coast
Guard District, Bridge Branch, telephone 305-415-6743, e-mail
barry.dragon@uscg.mil.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for Federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule will not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
[[Page 26823]]
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 0023.1, and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD which guides the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment because it simply
promulgates the operating regulations or procedures for drawbridges. We
seek any comments or information that may lead to the discovery of a
significant environmental impact from this proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 117
Bridges.
Regulations
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 117 as follows:
PART 117--DRAWBRIDGE OPERATION REGULATIONS
1. The authority citation for part 117 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 499; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1; 33 CFR 1.05-1(g).
2. Revise Sec. 117.337 as follows:
Sec. 117.337 Trout River.
The draw of the CSX Railroad Bridge across the Trout River, mile
0.9 at Jacksonville, operates as follows:
The bridge is not tender.
(a) The draw is normally in the fully open position, displaying
green lights to indicate that vessels may pass.
(b) As a train approaches, provided the scanners do not detect a
vessel under the draw, the lights change to flashing red and a horn
continuously sounds while the draw closes. The draw remains closed
until the train passes.
(c) After the train clears the bridge, the lights continue to flash
red and the horn again continuously sounds while the draw opens, until
the draw is fully open and the lights return to green.
Dated: May 12, 2009.
R.S. Branham,
Rear Admiral, U.S. Coast Guard Commander, Seventh Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. E9-12979 Filed 6-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P