Emission Standards for Turbine Engine Powered Airplanes; Correction, 26778-26779 [E9-12977]
Download as PDF
26778
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
evaluated using the criteria of § 23.1309,
the integral nature of systems such as
these makes it unfeasible to evaluate the
airplane portion of the system without
including the engine portion of the
system.
In some cases, the airplane that the
engine is used in will determine a
higher classification (Advisory Circular
(AC) 23.1309) than the engine controls
are certificated for, which will require
that the FADEC/DEEC systems be
analyzed at a higher classification. Since
November 2005, FADEC special
conditions have mandated the
classification for § 23.1309 analysis for
loss of FADEC control as catastrophic
for any airplane. This is not to imply
that an engine failure is classified as
catastrophic, but that the digital engine
control must provide an equivalent
reliability to mechanical engine
controls.
Type Certification Basis
Under the provisions of 14 CFR 21.17,
Spectrum Aeronautical, LLC must show
that the Model S–40 meets the
applicable provisions of 14 CFR part 23,
as amended by Amendments 23–1
through 23–57, thereto.
If the Administrator finds that the
applicable airworthiness regulations
(i.e., 14 CFR part 23) do not contain
adequate or appropriate safety standards
for the Model S–40 because of a novel
or unusual design feature, special
conditions are prescribed under the
provisions of § 21.16.
In addition to the applicable
airworthiness regulations and special
conditions, the Model S–40 must
comply with the fuel vent and exhaust
emission requirements of 14 CFR part
34 and the noise certification
requirements of 14 CFR part 36, and the
FAA must issue a finding of regulatory
adequacy under § 611 of Public Law 92–
574, the ‘‘Noise Control Act of 1972.’’
The FAA issues special conditions, as
appropriate, as defined in § 11.19, under
§ 11.38, and they become part of the
type certification basis under
§ 21.17(a)(2).
Special conditions are initially
applicable to the model for which they
are issued. Should the type certificate
for that model be amended later to
include any other model that
incorporates the same novel or unusual
design feature, the special conditions
would also apply to the other model.
Novel or Unusual Design Features
The Spectrum Aeronautical, LLC
Model S–40 will incorporate the
following novel or unusual design
features: Electronic engine control
system.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:50 Jun 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
Applicability
As discussed above, these special
conditions are applicable to the Model
S–40. Should Spectrum Aeronautical,
LLC apply at a later date for a change
to the type certificate to include another
model incorporating the same novel or
unusual design feature, the special
conditions would apply to that model as
well.
Under standard practice, the effective
date of final special conditions would
be 30 days after the date of publication
in the Federal Register; however, as the
certification date for the Spectrum
Aeronautical, LLC Model S–40 is
imminent, the FAA finds that good
cause exists to make these special
conditions effective upon issuance.
Conclusion
This action affects only certain novel
or unusual design features on one
model, Model S–40, of airplane. It is not
a rule of general applicability, and it
affects only the applicant who applied
to the FAA for approval of these features
on the airplane.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 23
Aircraft, Aviation safety, Signs and
symbols.
Citation
The authority citation for these
special conditions is as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113 and
44701; 14 CFR 21.16 and 21.17; and 14 CFR
11.38 and 11.19.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the following special conditions are
issued as part of the type certification
basis for Spectrum Aeronautical, LLC
Model S–40 airplanes.
■
1. Electronic Engine Control
The installation of the electronic
engine control system must comply
with the requirements of § 23.1309(a)
through (e) at Amendment 23–49. The
intent of this requirement is not to reevaluate the inherent hardware
reliability of the control itself, but rather
to determine the effects, including
environmental effects addressed in
§ 23.1309(e), on the airplane systems
and engine control system when
installing the control on the airplane.
When appropriate, engine certification
data may be used when showing
compliance with this requirement;
however, the effects of the installation
on this data must be addressed.
For these evaluations, the loss of
FADEC control will be analyzed
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
utilizing the threat levels associated
with a catastrophic failure.
Issued in Kansas City, Missouri on May 26,
2009.
John Colomy,
Acting Manager, Small Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–12992 Filed 6–3–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 34
[Docket No.: FAA–2009–0112; Amendment
No. 34–4]
RIN 2120–AJ41
Emission Standards for Turbine
Engine Powered Airplanes; Correction
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA) is amending an
error in its emission standards for
turbine engine powered airplanes. The
paragraph that describes the sampling
and analytical procedures for measuring
smoke exhaust emissions contains an
erroneous cross reference which was
included in the final rule. This
document corrects that error so that the
reader is able to locate the correct
information.
DATES: This correction is effective June
29, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
technical questions concerning this final
rule, contact Aimee Fisher, Emissions
Division (AEE–300), Office of
Environment and Energy, Federal
Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202)
267–7705; e-mail: aimee.fisher@faa.gov.
For legal questions concerning this rule,
contact Karen Petronis (AGC–200),
Office of the Chief Counsel, Regulations
Division, Federal Aviation
Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591;
telephone (202) 267–3073; e-mail:
karen.petronis@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FAA published a final rule
entitled ‘‘Emission Standards for
Turbine Engine Powered Airplanes’’ in
the Federal Register on Tuesday, April
28, 2009 (74 FR 19128). The final rule
amended emissions standards for
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 106 / Thursday, June 4, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
turbine engine powered airplanes to
incorporate the standards adopted by
the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA). This rule also
amended certain test procedures for
gaseous exhaust emissions, which are
based on the standards of the
International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) for gaseous
emissions of oxides of nitrogen (NOX).
This final rule, as published, contained
an erroneous cross reference to an ICAO
Annex in § 34.82. The correct reference
is ICAO Annex 16.
Correction
In FR Doc. E9–9433 appearing on page
19125 of the Federal Register of
Tuesday, April 28, 2009, make the
following corrections:
■
§ 34.82
[Amended]
1. On page 19128, second column, in
the first sentence of § 34.82, remove the
phrase ‘‘Appendix 2 to ICAO Annex 2
to ICAO Annex 16’’ and add the phrase
‘‘Appendix 2 to ICAO Annex 16’’ in its
place.
■
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 29,
2009.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E9–12977 Filed 6–3–09; 8:45 am]
direct routes for which a minimum or
maximum en route authorized IFR
altitude is prescribed. This regulatory
action is needed because of changes
occurring in the National Airspace
System. These changes are designed to
provide for the safe and efficient use of
the navigable airspace under instrument
conditions in the affected areas.
DATES: Effective Date: 0901 UTC, July
02, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Harry Hodges, Flight Procedure
Standards Branch (AMCAFS–420),
Flight Technologies and Programs
Division, Flight Standards Service,
Federal Aviation Administration, Mike
Monroney Aeronautical Center, 6500
South MacArthur Blvd., Oklahoma City,
OK 73169 (Mail Address: P.O. Box
25082, Oklahoma City, OK 73125)
telephone: (405) 954–4164.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This
amendment to part 95 of the Federal
Aviation Regulations (14 CFR part 95)
amends, suspends, or revokes IFR
altitudes governing the operation of all
aircraft in flight over a specified route
or any portion of that route, as well as
the changeover points (COPs) for
Federal airways, jet routes, or direct
routes as prescribed in part 95.
The Rule
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 95
[Docket No. 30669; Amdt. No. 481]
IFR Altitudes; Miscellaneous
Amendments
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This amendment adopts
miscellaneous amendments to the
required IFR (instrument flight rules)
altitudes and changeover points for
certain Federal airways, jet routes, or
The specified IFR altitudes, when
used in conjunction with the prescribed
changeover points for those routes,
ensure navigation aid coverage that is
adequate for safe flight operations and
free of frequency interference. The
reasons and circumstances that create
the need for this amendment involve
matters of flight safety and operational
efficiency in the National Airspace
System, are related to published
aeronautical charts that are essential to
the user, and provide for the safe and
efficient use of the navigable airspace.
In addition, those various reasons or
circumstances require making this
amendment effective before the next
scheduled charting and publication date
of the flight information to assure its
timely availability to the user. The
26779
effective date of this amendment reflects
those considerations. In view of the
close and immediate relationship
between these regulatory changes and
safety in air commerce, I find that notice
and public procedure before adopting
this amendment are impracticable and
contrary to the public interest and that
good cause exists for making the
amendment effective in less than 30
days.
Conclusion
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current. It, therefore—(1) is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
regulatory evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. For the same
reason, the FAA certifies that this
amendment will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 95
Airspace, Navigation (air).
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 29,
2009.
John M. Allen,
Director, Flight Standards Service.
Adoption of the Amendment
Accordingly, pursuant to the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
part 95 of the Federal Aviation
Regulations (14 CFR part 95) is
amended as follows effective at 0901
UTC, July 2, 2009.
■ 1. The authority citation for part 95
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40103, 40106,
40113, 40114, 40120, 44502, 44514, 44719,
44721.
■
2. Part 95 is amended as follows:
REVISIONS TO IFR ALTITUDES & CHANGEOVER POINTS
[Amendment 481 Effective Date, July 02, 2009]
From
To
§ 95.6031
§ 95.6001 Victor Routes-U.S.
VOR Federal Airway V31 Is Amended To Read in Part
Patuxent, MD VORTAC ................................................................
*6000–MRA
*Aruye, MD FIX .............................................................................
*6000–MRA
**3000–GNSS MEA
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:50 Jun 03, 2009
Jkt 217001
MEA
PO 00000
Frm 00009
*Aruye, MD FIX ............................................................................
2500
Nottingham, MD VORTAC ...........................................................
#**6000
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\04JNR1.SGM
04JNR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 106 (Thursday, June 4, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26778-26779]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12977]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 34
[Docket No.: FAA-2009-0112; Amendment No. 34-4]
RIN 2120-AJ41
Emission Standards for Turbine Engine Powered Airplanes;
Correction
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Final rule; correction.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is amending an error
in its emission standards for turbine engine powered airplanes. The
paragraph that describes the sampling and analytical procedures for
measuring smoke exhaust emissions contains an erroneous cross reference
which was included in the final rule. This document corrects that error
so that the reader is able to locate the correct information.
DATES: This correction is effective June 29, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For technical questions concerning
this final rule, contact Aimee Fisher, Emissions Division (AEE-300),
Office of Environment and Energy, Federal Aviation Administration, 800
Independence Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-
7705; e-mail: aimee.fisher@faa.gov. For legal questions concerning this
rule, contact Karen Petronis (AGC-200), Office of the Chief Counsel,
Regulations Division, Federal Aviation Administration, 800 Independence
Avenue, SW., Washington, DC 20591; telephone (202) 267-3073; e-mail:
karen.petronis@faa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The FAA published a final rule entitled ``Emission Standards for
Turbine Engine Powered Airplanes'' in the Federal Register on Tuesday,
April 28, 2009 (74 FR 19128). The final rule amended emissions
standards for
[[Page 26779]]
turbine engine powered airplanes to incorporate the standards adopted
by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This rule
also amended certain test procedures for gaseous exhaust emissions,
which are based on the standards of the International Civil Aviation
Organization (ICAO) for gaseous emissions of oxides of nitrogen
(NOX). This final rule, as published, contained an erroneous
cross reference to an ICAO Annex in Sec. 34.82. The correct reference
is ICAO Annex 16.
Correction
0
In FR Doc. E9-9433 appearing on page 19125 of the Federal Register of
Tuesday, April 28, 2009, make the following corrections:
Sec. 34.82 [Amended]
0
1. On page 19128, second column, in the first sentence of Sec. 34.82,
remove the phrase ``Appendix 2 to ICAO Annex 2 to ICAO Annex 16'' and
add the phrase ``Appendix 2 to ICAO Annex 16'' in its place.
Issued in Washington, DC, on May 29, 2009.
Pamela Hamilton-Powell,
Director, Office of Rulemaking.
[FR Doc. E9-12977 Filed 6-3-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P