Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 Airplanes; and Model ERJ 190-100 LR, -100 IGW, -100 STD, -200 STD, -200 LR, and -200 IGW Airplanes, 26315-26317 [E9-12802]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI European Union
Airworthiness Directive 2008–0212, dated
December 4, 2008; and Airbus Mandatory
Service Bulletin A310–53–2124, Revision 02,
dated May 22, 2008; for related information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 15,
2009.
Ali Bahrami,
Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate,
Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–12740 Filed 6–1–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0497; Directorate
Identifier 2009–NM–019–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 Airplanes;
and Model ERJ 190–100 LR, –100 IGW,
–100 STD, –200 STD, –200 LR, and
–200 IGW Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed
AD results from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
originated by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
It has been found the possibility of cracks
developing in the ram air turbine (RAT)
machined support, located in the forward
compartment [zone 124] of [the] aircraft, due
to downlock pin not [being] pull[ed] during
its retraction. In case of RAT failure or
malfunction, it will not provide electrical
power to essential systems of [the] aircraft in
[an] electrical emergency situation.
*
*
*
*
*
Lack of electrical power could result
in reduced controllability of the
airplane. The proposed AD would
require actions that are intended to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:00 Jun 01, 2009
Jkt 217001
address the unsafe condition described
in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 2, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact Empresa
Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER), Technical Publications
Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro Faria
˜
Lima, 2170–Putim–12227–901 Sao Jose
dos Campos–SP–BRASIL; telephone:
+55 12 3927–5852 or +55 12 3309–0732;
fax: +55 12 3927–7546; e-mail:
distrib@embraer.com.br; Internet: https://
www.flyembraer.com. You may review
copies of the referenced service
information at the FAA, Transport
Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind
Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 425–227–1221
or 425–227–1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM–116,
Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 227–2848; fax (425) 227–1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26315
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2009–0497; Directorate Identifier
2009–NM–019–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
ˆ
The Agencia Nacional de Aviacao
¸˜
Civil (ANAC), which is the aviation
authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian
Airworthiness Directives 2008–10–05
and 2008–10–06, both dated November
10, 2008 (referred to after this as ‘‘the
MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition
for the specified products. The MCAI
states:
It has been found the possibility of cracks
developing in the ram air turbine (RAT)
machined support, located in the forward
compartment [zone 124] of [the] aircraft, due
to downlock pin not [being] pull[ed] during
its retraction. In case of RAT failure or
malfunction, it will not provide electrical
power to essential systems of [the] aircraft in
[an] electrical emergency situation.
*
*
*
*
*
Lack of electrical power could result in
reduced controllability of the airplane.
Corrective actions include a detailed
visual inspection for cracking of the
RAT machined support, replacing the
support with a new part if any crack is
found, and reinforcing or replacing the
support if no crack is found. You may
obtain further information by examining
the MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Embraer has issued Service Bulletins
170–53–0057, dated February 21, 2008;
and 190–53–0027, dated February 18,
2008. The actions described in this
service information are intended to
correct the unsafe condition identified
in the MCAI.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
26316
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
develop on other products of the same
type design.
Differences Between This AD and the
MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and
related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But
we might have found it necessary to use
different words from those in the MCAI
to ensure the AD is clear for U.S.
operators and is enforceable. In making
these changes, we do not intend to differ
substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related
service information.
We might also have proposed
different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA
policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the
proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 163 products of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would
take about 60 work-hours per product to
comply with the basic requirements of
this proposed AD. The average labor
rate is $80 per work-hour. Required
parts would cost about $7,535 per
product. Where the service information
lists required parts costs that are
covered under warranty, we have
assumed that there will be no charge for
these costs. As we do not control
warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher
than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be
$2,010,605, or $12,335 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:00 Jun 01, 2009
Jkt 217001
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Incorporation by reference,
Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA–2009–
0497; Directorate Identifier 2009–NM–
019–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by July 2,
2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to EMBRAER Model
ERJ 170–100 LR, –100 STD, –100 SE, –100
SU, –200 LR, –200 STD, and –200 SU
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
airplanes, serial numbers 17000002,
17000004 through 17000013 inclusive, and
17000015 through 17000208 inclusive; and
Model ERJ 190–100 LR, –100 IGW, –100 STD,
–200 STD, –200 LR, and –200 IGW airplanes,
serial numbers 19000002, 19000004, and
19000006 through 19000152 inclusive;
certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of
America Code 53: Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI) states:
It has been found the possibility of cracks
developing in the ram air turbine (RAT)
machined support, located in the forward
compartment [zone 124] of [the] aircraft, due
to downlock pin not [being] pull[ed] during
its retraction. In case of RAT failure or
malfunction, it will not provide electrical
power to essential systems of [the] aircraft in
[an] electrical emergency situation.
*
*
*
*
*
Lack of electrical power could result in
reduced controllability of the airplane.
Corrective actions include a detailed visual
inspection for cracking of the RAT machined
support, replacing the support with a new
part if any crack is found, and reinforcing or
replacing the support if no crack is found.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following
actions. Within 600 flight hours after the
effective date of this AD: Perform a detailed
visual inspection for cracks in the RAT
machined support, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions in Embraer
Service Bulletin 170–53–0057, dated
February 21, 2008; or Embraer Service
Bulletin 190–53–0027, dated February 18,
2008; as applicable.
(1) If no crack is found, at the earlier of the
times specified in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and
(f)(1)(ii) of this AD, install reinforcements in
the RAT machined support or replace the
RAT machined support with a new support
having part number 170–18676–405, in
accordance with the Accomplishment
Instructions of Embraer Service Bulletin 170–
53–0057, dated February 21, 2008; or
Embraer Service Bulletin 190–53–0027, dated
February 18, 2008; as applicable.
(i) Within 5,000 flight hours after
accomplishing the inspection required by
paragraph (f) of this AD.
(ii) Before further flight after the next two
RAT deployments—which can be a flight
deployment or a maintenance review board
task procedure—after accomplishing the
inspection required by paragraph (f) of this
AD.
(2) If any cracking is found, before further
flight, replace the RAT machined support
with a new support having part number 170–
18676–405, in accordance with the
Accomplishment Instructions of Embraer
Service Bulletin 170–53–0057, dated
February 21, 2008; or Embraer Service
Bulletin 190–53–0027, dated February 18,
2008; as applicable.
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
FAA AD Differences
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI
and/or service information as follows:
Although the MCAI or service information
allows further flight after cracks are found
during compliance with the required action,
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD requires that you
replace any cracked lug of the RAT machined
support with a new support before further
flight.
Federal Aviation Administration
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to
this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs): The Manager, International
Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Send information to ATTN: Kenny Kaulia,
Aerospace Engineer, International Branch,
ANM–116, Transport Airplane Directorate,
FAA, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425)
227–2848; fax (425) 227–1149. Before using
any approved AMOC on any airplane to
which the AMOC applies, notify your
principal maintenance inspector (PMI) or
principal avionics inspector (PAI), as
appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector,
your local Flight Standards District Office.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement
in this AD to obtain corrective actions from
a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective
actions are considered FAA-approved if they
are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required
to assure the product is airworthy before it
is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any
reporting requirement in this AD, under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act,
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB)
has approved the information collection
requirements and has assigned OMB Control
Number 2120–0056.
Related Information
ˆ
(h) Refer to MCAI Agencia Nacional de
Aviacao Civil (ANAC) Airworthiness
¸˜
Directives 2008–10–05 and 2008–10–06, both
dated November 10, 2008; Embraer Service
Bulletin 170–53–0057, dated February 21,
2008; and Embraer Service Bulletin 190–53–
0027, dated February 18, 2008; for related
information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 20,
2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–12802 Filed 6–1–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:00 Jun 01, 2009
Jkt 217001
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0454; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NM–156–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Boeing
Model 747–400, 747–400D, and 747–
400F Series Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for certain
Boeing Model 747–400, 747–400D, and
747–400F series airplanes. For all
airplanes, this proposed AD would
require installing new pump control and
time delay relays, doing related
investigative and corrective actions if
necessary, and changing the wiring for
the center and main fuel tanks override/
jettison fuel pumps; and, for certain
airplanes, installing new relays and
wiring for the horizontal stabilizer
override/jettison fuel pumps. This
proposed AD would also require a
revision to the maintenance program to
incorporate Airworthiness Limitation
No. 28–AWL–24 and No. 28–AWL–26.
For certain airplanes, this proposed AD
would also require installing an
automatic shutoff system for the
horizontal stabilizer tank fuel pumps
and installing a new integrated display
system. This proposed AD results from
fuel system reviews conducted by the
manufacturer. We are proposing this AD
to prevent uncommanded operation of
certain override/jettison pumps which
could cause overheat, electrical arcs, or
frictional sparks, and could lead to an
ignition source inside a fuel tank. This
condition, in combination with
flammable fuel vapors, could result in a
fuel tank explosion and consequent loss
of the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by July 17, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26317
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this AD, contact Boeing Commercial
Airplanes, Attention: Data & Services
Management, P.O. Box 3707, MC 2H–65,
Seattle, Washington 98124–2207;
telephone 206–544–5000, extension 1,
fax 206–766–5680; e-mail
me.boecom@boeing.com; Internet
https://www.myboeingfleet.com.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Management Facility between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD
docket contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Office
(telephone 800–647–5527) is in the
ADDRESSES section. Comments will be
available in the AD docket shortly after
receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jon
Regimbal, Aerospace Engineer,
Propulsion Branch, ANM–140S, FAA,
Seattle Aircraft Certification Office,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington 98057–3356; telephone
(425) 917–6506; fax (425) 917–6590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2009–0454; Directorate Identifier
2008–NM–156–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD because of those
comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The FAA has examined the
underlying safety issues involved in fuel
tank explosions on several large
transport airplanes, including the
adequacy of existing regulations, the
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 2, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26315-26317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12802]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2009-0497; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-019-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A.
(EMBRAER) Model ERJ 170 Airplanes; and Model ERJ 190-100 LR, -100 IGW,
-100 STD, -200 STD, -200 LR, and -200 IGW Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM).
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This proposed AD results from mandatory
continuing airworthiness information (MCAI) originated by an aviation
authority of another country to identify and correct an unsafe
condition on an aviation product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
It has been found the possibility of cracks developing in the
ram air turbine (RAT) machined support, located in the forward
compartment [zone 124] of [the] aircraft, due to downlock pin not
[being] pull[ed] during its retraction. In case of RAT failure or
malfunction, it will not provide electrical power to essential
systems of [the] aircraft in [an] electrical emergency situation.
* * * * *
Lack of electrical power could result in reduced controllability of
the airplane. The proposed AD would require actions that are intended
to address the unsafe condition described in the MCAI.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by July 2, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Mail: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket
Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
For service information identified in this proposed AD, contact
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER), Technical
Publications Section (PC 060), Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170-Putim-
12227-901 S[atilde]o Jose dos Campos-SP-BRASIL; telephone: +55 12 3927-
5852 or +55 12 3309-0732; fax: +55 12 3927-7546; e-mail:
distrib@embraer.com.br; Internet: https://www.flyembraer.com. You may
review copies of the referenced service information at the FAA,
Transport Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton,
Washington. For information on the availability of this material at the
FAA, call 425-227-1221 or 425-227-1152.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
in the ADDRESSES section. Comments will be available in the AD docket
shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone (425)
227-2848; fax (425) 227-1149.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2009-0497;
Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-019-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact we
receive about this proposed AD.
Discussion
The Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC),
which is the aviation authority for Brazil, has issued Brazilian
Airworthiness Directives 2008-10-05 and 2008-10-06, both dated November
10, 2008 (referred to after this as ``the MCAI''), to correct an unsafe
condition for the specified products. The MCAI states:
It has been found the possibility of cracks developing in the
ram air turbine (RAT) machined support, located in the forward
compartment [zone 124] of [the] aircraft, due to downlock pin not
[being] pull[ed] during its retraction. In case of RAT failure or
malfunction, it will not provide electrical power to essential
systems of [the] aircraft in [an] electrical emergency situation.
* * * * *
Lack of electrical power could result in reduced controllability of the
airplane. Corrective actions include a detailed visual inspection for
cracking of the RAT machined support, replacing the support with a new
part if any crack is found, and reinforcing or replacing the support if
no crack is found. You may obtain further information by examining the
MCAI in the AD docket.
Relevant Service Information
Embraer has issued Service Bulletins 170-53-0057, dated February
21, 2008; and 190-53-0027, dated February 18, 2008. The actions
described in this service information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the MCAI.
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation in the United States. Pursuant
to our bilateral agreement with the State of Design Authority, we have
been notified of the unsafe condition described in the
[[Page 26316]]
MCAI and service information referenced above. We are proposing this AD
because we evaluated all pertinent information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of
the same type design.
Differences Between This AD and the MCAI or Service Information
We have reviewed the MCAI and related service information and, in
general, agree with their substance. But we might have found it
necessary to use different words from those in the MCAI to ensure the
AD is clear for U.S. operators and is enforceable. In making these
changes, we do not intend to differ substantively from the information
provided in the MCAI and related service information.
We might also have proposed different actions in this AD from those
in the MCAI in order to follow FAA policies. Any such differences are
highlighted in a Note within the proposed AD.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 163 products of U.S. registry. We also estimate that
it would take about 60 work-hours per product to comply with the basic
requirements of this proposed AD. The average labor rate is $80 per
work-hour. Required parts would cost about $7,535 per product. Where
the service information lists required parts costs that are covered
under warranty, we have assumed that there will be no charge for these
costs. As we do not control warranty coverage for affected parties,
some parties may incur costs higher than estimated here. Based on these
figures, we estimate the cost of the proposed AD on U.S. operators to
be $2,010,605, or $12,335 per product.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Incorporation by
reference, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Empresa Brasileira de Aeronautica S.A. (EMBRAER): Docket No. FAA-
2009-0497; Directorate Identifier 2009-NM-019-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by July 2, 2009.
Affected ADs
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to EMBRAER Model ERJ 170-100 LR, -100 STD, -
100 SE, -100 SU, -200 LR, -200 STD, and -200 SU airplanes, serial
numbers 17000002, 17000004 through 17000013 inclusive, and 17000015
through 17000208 inclusive; and Model ERJ 190-100 LR, -100 IGW, -100
STD, -200 STD, -200 LR, and -200 IGW airplanes, serial numbers
19000002, 19000004, and 19000006 through 19000152 inclusive;
certificated in any category.
Subject
(d) Air Transport Association (ATA) of America Code 53:
Fuselage.
Reason
(e) The mandatory continuing airworthiness information (MCAI)
states:
It has been found the possibility of cracks developing in the
ram air turbine (RAT) machined support, located in the forward
compartment [zone 124] of [the] aircraft, due to downlock pin not
[being] pull[ed] during its retraction. In case of RAT failure or
malfunction, it will not provide electrical power to essential
systems of [the] aircraft in [an] electrical emergency situation.
* * * * *
Lack of electrical power could result in reduced controllability of
the airplane. Corrective actions include a detailed visual
inspection for cracking of the RAT machined support, replacing the
support with a new part if any crack is found, and reinforcing or
replacing the support if no crack is found.
Actions and Compliance
(f) Unless already done, do the following actions. Within 600
flight hours after the effective date of this AD: Perform a detailed
visual inspection for cracks in the RAT machined support, in
accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions in Embraer Service
Bulletin 170-53-0057, dated February 21, 2008; or Embraer Service
Bulletin 190-53-0027, dated February 18, 2008; as applicable.
(1) If no crack is found, at the earlier of the times specified
in paragraphs (f)(1)(i) and (f)(1)(ii) of this AD, install
reinforcements in the RAT machined support or replace the RAT
machined support with a new support having part number 170-18676-
405, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of Embraer
Service Bulletin 170-53-0057, dated February 21, 2008; or Embraer
Service Bulletin 190-53-0027, dated February 18, 2008; as
applicable.
(i) Within 5,000 flight hours after accomplishing the inspection
required by paragraph (f) of this AD.
(ii) Before further flight after the next two RAT deployments--
which can be a flight deployment or a maintenance review board task
procedure--after accomplishing the inspection required by paragraph
(f) of this AD.
(2) If any cracking is found, before further flight, replace the
RAT machined support with a new support having part number 170-
18676-405, in accordance with the Accomplishment Instructions of
Embraer Service Bulletin 170-53-0057, dated February 21, 2008; or
Embraer Service Bulletin 190-53-0027, dated February 18, 2008; as
applicable.
[[Page 26317]]
FAA AD Differences
Note 1: This AD differs from the MCAI and/or service information
as follows:
Although the MCAI or service information allows further flight
after cracks are found during compliance with the required action,
paragraph (f)(2) of this AD requires that you replace any cracked
lug of the RAT machined support with a new support before further
flight.
Other FAA AD Provisions
(g) The following provisions also apply to this AD:
(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs): The Manager,
International Branch, ANM-116, FAA, has the authority to approve
AMOCs for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19. Send information to ATTN: Kenny Kaulia, Aerospace Engineer,
International Branch, ANM-116, Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA,
1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057-3356; telephone
(425) 227-2848; fax (425) 227-1149. Before using any approved AMOC
on any airplane to which the AMOC applies, notify your principal
maintenance inspector (PMI) or principal avionics inspector (PAI),
as appropriate, or lacking a principal inspector, your local Flight
Standards District Office.
(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement in this AD to obtain
corrective actions from a manufacturer or other source, use these
actions if they are FAA-approved. Corrective actions are considered
FAA-approved if they are approved by the State of Design Authority
(or their delegated agent). You are required to assure the product
is airworthy before it is returned to service.
(3) Reporting Requirements: For any reporting requirement in
this AD, under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act, the
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has approved the information
collection requirements and has assigned OMB Control Number 2120-
0056.
Related Information
(h) Refer to MCAI Ag[ecirc]ncia Nacional de
Avia[ccedil][atilde]o Civil (ANAC) Airworthiness Directives 2008-10-
05 and 2008-10-06, both dated November 10, 2008; Embraer Service
Bulletin 170-53-0057, dated February 21, 2008; and Embraer Service
Bulletin 190-53-0027, dated February 18, 2008; for related
information.
Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 20, 2009.
Stephen P. Boyd,
Acting Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification
Service.
[FR Doc. E9-12802 Filed 6-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P