Incorporation by Reference of Regulatory Guide 1.84, Revision 35, and Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision 16, Into 10 CFR 50.55a, 26303-26310 [E9-12751]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
§ 894.510 When may I decrease my type of
enrollment?
recordkeeping requirements,
Retirement.
*
John Berry,
Director, U.S. Office of Personnel
Management.
Accordingly, OPM is amending 5 CFR
part 894 as follows:
PART 894—FEDERAL EMPLOYEES
DENTAL AND VISION PROGRAM
1. The authority citation for part 894
is revised to read as follows:
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 8962; 5 U.S.C. 8992;
subpart C also issued under sec. 1 of Public
Law 110–279, 122 Stat. 2604.
Subpart C—Eligibility
2. Revise § 894.301 to read as follows
§ 894.301
FEDVIP?
Am I eligible to enroll in the
You are eligible if—
(a) You meet the definition of
employee in 5 U.S.C. 8901(1), unless
you are in an excluded position;
(b) You are an employee of the United
States Postal Service or the District of
Columbia courts;
(c)(1) You were employed by the
Architect of the Capitol as a Senate
Restaurants employee the day before the
food services operations of the Senate
Restaurants were transferred to a private
business concern; and
(2) You accepted employment by the
business concern and elected to
continue your Federal retirement
benefits and your FEDVIP coverage. You
continue to be eligible for FEDVIP
coverage as long as you remain
employed by the business concern or its
successor.
3. Revise § 894.302 introductory text
to read as follows:
§ 894.302
[FR Doc. E9–12617 Filed 6–1–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325–39–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 50
RIN 3150–AI37
[NRC 2009–0014]
What is an excluded position?
Excluded positions are described in 5
U.S.C. 8901(1)(i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) and
5 CFR 890.102(c), except that employees
of the United States Postal Service and
District of Columbia courts are not
excluded positions.
*
*
*
*
*
Subpart E—Enrollment and Changing
Enrollment
4. Revise § 894.501(d) to read as
follows:
§ 894.501
*
*
*
*
(c)(1) Except as provided in paragraph
(c)(2) of this section, you may decrease
your type of enrollment only during the
period beginning 31 days before your
QLE and ending 60 days after your QLE.
(2) You may make any of the
following enrollment changes at any
time beginning 31 days before a QLE
listed in § 894.511(a):
(i) A decrease in your self plus one
enrollment;
(ii) A decrease in your self and family
enrollment to a self plus one
enrollment, when you have only one
remaining eligible family member; or
(iii) A decrease in your self and family
enrollment to a self only enrollment,
when you have no remaining eligible
family members.
(d)(1) Except as provided in paragraph
(d)(2) of this section, your change in
enrollment is effective the first day of
the first pay period following the one in
which you make the change.
(2) If you are making an enrollment
change described in paragraph (c)(2) of
this section, your change in enrollment
is effective on the first day of the first
pay period following the QLE on which
the enrollment change is based.
*
*
*
*
*
When may I enroll?
*
*
*
*
*
(d) From 31 days before you or an
eligible family member loses other
dental/vision coverage to 60 days after
a QLE that allows you to enroll.
5. Revise § 894.510(c) and (d) to read
as follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:00 Jun 01, 2009
Jkt 217001
Incorporation by Reference of
Regulatory Guide 1.84, Revision 35,
and Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision
16, Into 10 CFR 50.55a
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The NRC is proposing to
amend its regulations to incorporate by
reference the latest revisions of two
regulatory guides (RG) that would
approve new and revised code cases
published by the American Society of
Mechanical Engineers (ASME). These
are RG 1.84, ‘‘Design, Fabrication, and
Materials Code Case Acceptability,
ASME Section III,’’ Revision 35, and RG
1.147, ‘‘Inservice Inspection Code Case
Acceptability, ASME Section XI,
Division 1,’’ Revision 16. This action
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26303
would allow the use of the code cases
listed in these RGs as alternatives to
requirements in the ASME Boiler and
Pressure Vessel (BPV) Code regarding
the construction and inservice
inspection (ISI) of nuclear power plant
components. Concurrent with this
action, the NRC is publishing a notice
of the issuance and availability of the
RGs in the Federal Register.
DATES: Submit comments by August 17,
2009. Comments received after this date
will be considered if it is practical to do
so, but the Commission is able to ensure
consideration only of comments
received on or before this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by any one of the following methods.
Please include the number RN 3150–
AI37 in the subject line of your
comments. Comments submitted in
writing or in electronic form will be
made available for public inspection.
Because your comments will not be
edited to remove any identifying or
contact information, the NRC cautions
you against including any information
in your submission that you do not want
to be publicly disclosed.
Federal e Rulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for documents filed under Docket ID
NRC–2009–0014. Address questions
about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher at
301–492–3668, e-mail
Carol.Gallager@nrc.gov.
Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, Attn:
Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.
E-mail comments to:
Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. If you
do not receive a reply e-mail confirming
that we have received your comments,
contact us directly at 301–415–1677.
Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission at 301–
415–1101.
Publicly available documents related
to this rulemaking, including comments,
may be viewed electronically on the
public computers located at the NRC’s
Public Document Room (PDR), O1–F21,
One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville
Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The
PDR reproduction contractor will copy
documents for a fee.
Publicly available documents created
or received at the NRC after November
1, 1999, are available electronically at
the NRC’s Electronic Reading Room at
https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/
adams.html. From this site, the public
can gain entry into ADAMS, which
provides text and image files of NRC’s
public documents. If you do not have
access to ADAMS or if there are
problems in accessing the documents
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
26304
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
located in ADAMS, contact the PDR
Reference staff at 800–397–4209, 301–
415–4737, or by e-mail to
pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Manash K. Bagchi or L. M. Padovan,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001, telephone
301–415–2905, e-mail
Manash.Bagchi@nrc.gov, or 301–415–
1423, e-mail Mark.Padovan@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The ASME develops and publishes
the ASME BPV Code, which contains
requirements for the design,
construction, and ISI of nuclear power
plant components, and the Code for
Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear
Power Plants (OM Code), which
contains requirements for inservice
testing (IST) of nuclear power plant
components. In response to BPV and
OM Code user requests, the ASME
develops ASME Code Cases which
provide alternatives to BPV and OM
Code requirements under special
circumstances.
The NRC approves and/or mandates
the use of the ASME BPV and OM Code
in 10 CFR 50.55a through the process of
incorporation by reference. As such,
each provision of the ASME Codes
incorporated by reference into, and
mandated by, § 50.55a constitutes a
legally-binding NRC requirement
imposed by rule. As noted above, ASME
Code Cases, for the most part, represent
alternative approaches for complying
with provisions of the ASME BPV and
OM Codes. Accordingly, the NRC
periodically amends § 50.55 to
incorporate by reference NRC RGs
listing approved ASME Code Cases
which may be used as alternatives to the
BPV Code and the OM Code. See 68 FR
40469 (July 8, 2003).
This rulemaking is the latest in a
series of rulemakings which incorporate
by reference new versions of several
RGs identifying new and revised 1
ASME Code Cases which are approved
for use, either unconditionally or with
conditions. In developing these RGs, the
NRC staff reviews ASME BPV and OM
Code Cases, determines the
acceptability of each Code Case, and
publishes its findings in RGs. The RGs
are revised periodically as new code
cases are published by the ASME. The
NRC incorporates by reference the RGs
listing acceptable and conditionally
acceptable ASME Code Cases into 10
CFR 50.55a. Currently, NRC RG 1.84,
Revision 34, ‘‘Design, Fabrication, and
Materials Code Case Acceptability,
ASME Section III;’’ RG 1.147, Revision
15, ‘‘Inservice Inspection Code Case
Acceptability, ASME Section XI,
Division 1;’’ and RG 1.192, ‘‘Operation
and Maintenance Code Case
Acceptability, ASME OM Code,’’ are
incorporated into the NRC’s regulations
at 10 CFR 50.55a, Codes and standards.
Description of NRC Approval of New
and Amended ASME Code Cases
This proposed rule would incorporate
by reference the latest revisions of the
NRC RGs that list acceptable and
conditionally acceptable ASME BPV
Code Cases. RG 1.84, Revision 35, Draft
Regulatory Guide (DG) 1191, would
supersede the incorporation by
reference of Revision 34; and RG 1.147,
Revision 16, DG 1192, would supersede
the incorporation by reference of
Revision 15. RG 1192 dated June 2003
would not be revised because there have
been no new OM Code Cases published
by the ASME since the last NRC staff
review.
The ASME Code Cases which are the
subject of this rulemaking are the new
revised Section III and Section XI Code
Cases listed in Supplements 2 through
11 to the 2004 BPV Code, and
Supplement 0 published with the 2007
Edition of the BPV Code (Supplement 0
also serves as Supplement 12 to the
2004 Edition) of the code. The NRC
follows a three step process to
determine acceptability of new and
revised ASME Code Cases and the need
for conditions on the uses of these Code
Cases. This process was employed in
the review of the ASME Code Cases
which are the subject of this proposed
rule. First, NRC staff actively
participates with other ASME
committee members with full
involvement in discussions and
technical debates in the development of
new and revised code cases. This
includes a technical justification in
support of each new or revised code
case. Second, the NRC committee
representatives distribute the code case
and technical justification to other
cognizant NRC staff to ensure an
adequate technical review. Finally, the
proposed NRC position on each code
case is reviewed and approved by NRC
management as part of the rulemaking
amending 10 CFR 50.55a to incorporate
by reference new revisions of the RGs
listing the relevant ASME Code Cases
and conditions on their use. This
regulatory process, when considered
together with the ASME’s own process
for development and approval of ASME
Code Cases, provides reasonable
assurances that the NRC approves for
use only those new and revised ASME
Code Cases (with conditions as
necessary) which provide reasonable
assurance of adequate protection to
public health and safety and which do
not have significant adverse impacts on
the environment.
Code Cases Approved Unconditionally
for Use
The NRC concluded, in accordance
with the process for review of ASME
Code Cases, that each of the ASME Code
Cases listed in Table 1 is technically
adequate and consistent with current
NRC regulations.
TABLE 1
Code case No.
Supplement
Title
Section III
N–4–12 .....................
N–284–2 ...................
N–373–3 ...................
4
12
3
N–621–1 ...................
3
Special Type 403 Modified Forgings or Bars, Class and CS, Section III, Division 1.
Metal Containment Shell Buckling Design Methods, Class MC, Section III, Division 1.
Alternative postweld heat treatment (PWHT) Time at Temperature for P–No. 5A or P–No. 5B Group 1
Material, Classes 1, 2, and 3 Section III, Division 1.
Ni-Cr-Mo Alloy Unified Numbering System (UNS) N06022) Weld Construction to 800 °F, Section III, Division 1.
1 ASME Code Cases can be categorized as one of
one of two types: new and revised. A new Code
Case provides for the first time an alternative to
specific ASME Code provisions or addresses a new
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:00 Jun 01, 2009
Jkt 217001
need. A revised Code Case is a revision
(modification) to an existing Code Case to address,
for example, technological advancements in
examination techniques or to address NRC
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
conditions imposed in one of the regulatory guides
which have been incorporated by reference into 10
CFR 50.55a.
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
26305
TABLE 1—Continued
Code case No.
Supplement
N–699 .......................
8
N–725 .......................
4
N–727 .......................
9
N–732 .......................
N–736 .......................
5
8
N–738 .......................
N–741 .......................
6
7
N–744 .......................
N–746 .......................
11
8
N–756 .......................
12
N–759 .......................
11
Title
Use of Titanium Grade 2 (UNS R50400) Tube and Bar, and Grade 1 (UNS R50250) Plate and Sheet for
Class 1 Construction, Section III, Division 1.
Design Stress Values for UNS N06690 With Minimum Specified Yield Strength of 35 Ksi (240 Mpa),
Classes 2 and 3 Components, Section III, Division 1.
Dissimilar Welding Using Continuous Drive Friction Welding for Reactor Vessel Control Rod Drive Mechanism (CRDM)/Control Element Drive Mechanism (CEDM) Nozzle to Flange/Adapter Welds, Class 1,
Section III, Division 1.
Magnetic Particle Examination of Forgings for Construction, Section III, Division 1.
Use UNS S32050 Welded and Seamless Pipe and Tubing, Forgings, and Plates Conforming to SA–249/
SA–249M, SA–479/SA–479M, and SA–240/SA–240M, and Grade CK35MN Castings Conforming to
ASTM A 743–03 for Construction of Class 1, 2, and 3 Components, Section III, Division 1.
NDE of Full Penetration Butt Welds in Class 2 Supports, Section III, Division 1.
Use of 22Cr-5Ni-3Mo-N (Alloy UNS S32205 Austenitic/Ferritic Duplex Stainless Steel) Forgings, Plate,
Welded and Seamless Pipe Tubing, and Fittings to SA–182, SA–240, SA–789, A 790–04a, SA–815,
Classes 2 and 3, Section III, Division 1.
Use of Metric Units Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section III, Division 1.
Use of 46Fe-24Ni-21Cr-6Mo-Cu-N (UNS N08367) Bolting Materials for Class 2 and 3 Components, Section III, Division 1.
Alternative Rules for Acceptability for Class 1 Valves, nominal pipe size (NPS) diameter nominelle (DN
25) and Smaller with Non-Welded End Connections Other than Flanges, Section III, Division III
Alternative Rules for Determining Allowable External Pressure and Compressive Stresses for Cylinders,
Cones, Spheres, and Formed Heads, Section III, Division 1.
Section XI
N–494–4 ...................
7
N–496–2 ...................
N–666 .......................
N–686–1 ...................
N–705 .......................
2
9
12
11
N–706–1 ...................
12
N–712 .......................
2
N–730 .......................
N–731 .......................
N–733 .......................
11
5
6
N–735 .......................
N–739 .......................
11
11
N–753 .......................
10
Pipe Specific Evaluation Procedures and Acceptance Criteria for Flaws in Piping that Exceed the Acceptance Standards, Section XI, Division 1.
Reaffirmed Helical-Coil Threaded Inserts, Section XI, Division 1.
Weld Overlay of Class 1, 2, and 3 Socket Welded Connections, Section XI, Division 1.
Alternative Requirements for Visual Examinations VT–1, VT–2, and VT–3, Section XI, Division 1.
Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of Degradation in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Vessels
and Tanks, Section XI, Division 1.
Alternative Examination Requirements of Table IWB–2500–1 and Table IWC–2500–1 for Pressurized
Water Reactor (PWR) Stainless Steel Residual and Regenerative Heat Exchangers, Section XI, Division 1.
Roll Expansion of Class 1 Control Rod Drive Bottom Head Penetrations in Boiling Water Reactors (BWR),
Section XI, Division 1.
Class 1 Socket Weld Examinations, Section XI, Division 1.
Alternative Class 1 System Leakage Test Pressure Requirements, Section XI, Division 1.
Mitigation of Flaws in NPS 2 (DN 50) and Smaller Nozzles and Nozzle Partial Penetration Welds in Vessels and Piping by Use of a Mechanical Connection Modification, Section XI, Division 1.
Successive Inspection of Class 1 and 2 Piping Welds, Section XI, Division 1.
Alternative Qualification Requirements for Personnel Performing Class CC Concrete and Post-tensioning
System Visual Examinations, Section XI, Division 1.
Vision Tests, Section XI, Division 1.
Code Case Approved for Use With
Conditions
As a result of the NRC staff’s review,
the NRC determined that certain code
cases were technically inadequate or
required supplemental guidance.
Accordingly, the NRC proposes to
impose conditions upon the use of these
code cases. These ASME Code Cases are
included in DG–1191 (RG 1.84, in Table
2, and in DG–1192 (RG–1.147) in Table
2. The NRC’s evaluation of the code
cases and the reasons for the NRC’s
proposed conditions are discussed in
the following paragraphs. Notations
have been made to indicate the
conditions duplicated from previous
versions of the regulatory guides.
The NRC requests public comment on
these code cases as part of this
rulemaking. It should also be noted that
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:00 Jun 01, 2009
Jkt 217001
the following paragraphs only address
those code cases for which the NRC
proposes to impose condition which are
listed in the regulatory guides for the
first time (e.g., Code Case N–532–4,
which is listed in Supplement 9, has
already been approved in Revision 15 to
RG 1.147).
4.5
Section III
Code Case N–570–1 [S8]
Type: Revised.
Title: Alternative Rules for Linear
Piping and Linear Standard Supports
for Classes 1, 2, 3, and [Metal Cladding
(MC)], Section III, Division 1.
Code Case N–570–1 references
American National Standards Institute
(ANSI)/American Institute of Steel
Construction (AISC) N690–1994 s1,
‘‘Supplement No. 1 to the Specification
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
for the Design, Fabrication, and Erection
of Steel Safety-Related Structures for
Nuclear Facilities.’’ However, the AISC
issued Supplement 2 on October 6,
2004. Supplement 2 supersedes
Supplement 1.
The updated supplement
(Supplement 2) is consistent with NRC
positions and requirements for new
reactor support design. Thus, the NRC is
proposing to condition Code Case N–
570–1 to require that ANSI/AISC N690–
1994 s2, ‘‘Supplement No. 2 to the
Specification for the Design,
Fabrication, and Erection of Steel
Safety-Related Structures for Nuclear
Facilities,’’ be used when this code case
is implemented.
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
26306
4.6
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Section XI
Code Case N–416–4 [S1]
Type: Revised.
Title: Alternative Pressure Test
Requirement for Welded Repairs or
Installation of Replacement Items by
Welding, Class 1, 2, and 3, Section XI,
Division 1.
The NRC proposes to condition Code
Case N–416–4 to require that
nondestructive examination be
performed for welded or brazed repairs
and fabrication and installation joints in
accordance with the methods and
acceptance criteria of the applicable
subsection of the 1992 Edition of
Section III.
For certain welding repairs or
replacements, the previous version of
this code case (Code Case N–416–3)
permitted a system leakage test to be
performed in lieu of performing a
hydrostatic pressure test provided that
certain requirements are met. One of the
requirements was that nondestructive
examination (NDE) be performed on
welded repairs, fabrication, and
installation joints in accordance with
the methods and acceptance criteria of
the applicable subsection of the 1992
Edition of Section III.
This NDE requirement was removed
when Code Case N–416–4 was issued.
When Code Case N–416 was originally
developed, the NRC agreed to the
performance of system leakage testing in
lieu of hydrostatic testing provided that
NDE performed in conjunction with the
repair met the requirements of the 1992
Edition of Section III. The reason for
this stipulation is that some
construction codes are less rigorous
than others, depending on when the
provisions were developed. The NRC
believes that to justify the elimination of
the NDE provision a hydrostatic
pressure test would be required. It is the
NRC’s position that a system leakage
pressure test does not provide an
equivalent level of safety as a
hydrostatic pressure test. The higher
pressure of the hydrostatic pressure test
would make any potential leakage more
evident than if a system leakage test was
performed, particularly in the case of
smaller defects. In as much as the NRC
believes that a hydrostatic pressure test
would not be effective in this situation,
the more rigorous NDE requirements of
Section III must be performed (as is
currently required by N–416–3).
As discussed above, the NDE
provision is contained in Code Case N–
416–3. Code Case N–416–3 was
approved in Revision 14 of Regulatory
Guide 1.147 (August 2005), which has
already been implemented by licensees.
Thus, requiring the performance of NDE
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:00 Jun 01, 2009
Jkt 217001
after these repairs and replacements is
not a new position and is merely the
continuation of current practice. It
should be noted that the NDE
requirement was also removed from
paragraph IWA–4540(a) of the 2003
Addenda to Section XI. The NRC
imposed a condition similar to the one
discussed above for Code Case N–416–
3 in 10 CFR 50.55a on the use of IWA–
4540(a) in the 2003 Addendum to
Section XI.
Code Case N–504–4 [S10]
Type: Revised.
Title: Alternate Rules for Repair of
Classes 1, 2, and 3 Austenitic Stainless
Steel Piping, Section XI, Division 1.
Revision 3 to this code case was
conditionally approved in Revision 15
to RG 1.147 to require that Section XI,
Nonmandatory Appendix Q, ‘‘Weld
Overlay Repair of Class 1, 2, and 3
Austenitic Stainless Steel Piping
Weldments,’’ must also be met. The
NRC has determined that N–504–4 is
acceptable with the same condition.
Accordingly, the regulatory position has
not changed.
Code Case N–638–4 [S11]
Type: Revised.
Title: Similar and Dissimilar Metal
Welding Using Ambient Temperature
Machine (GTAW) Temper Bead
Technique, Section XI, Division 1.
The same conditions applied to the
previous version of the code case (N–
638–1) which was approved in Revision
15 to RG 1.147 (Revisions 2 and 3 to the
code case were published by the ASME
between regulatory guide cycles).
Accordingly, the NRC’s position has not
changed.
Code Case N–661–1 [S7]
Type: Revised.
Title: Alternative Requirements for
Wall Thickness Restoration of Class 2
and 3 Carbon Steel Piping for Raw
Water Service, Section XI, Division 1.
With regard to Code Case N–661–1,
the NRC is proposing to retain
conditions (a) and (c) of the following
three conditions that were imposed on
Code Case N–661 in RG 1.147, Revision
15:
(a) If the root cause of the degradation
has not been determined, the repair is
only acceptable for one cycle.
(b) Weld overlay repair of an area can
only be performed once in the same
location.
(c) When through-wall repairs are
made by welding on surfaces that are
wet or exposed to water, the weld
overlay repair is only acceptable until
the next refueling outage.
Code Case N–661–1 uses the term
‘‘one fuel cycle.’’ It is unclear what one
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
fuel cycle actually infers if a repair is
performed in mid-cycle. It may be
interpreted that the repair is acceptable
for the remainder of the current fuel
cycle plus the subsequent fuel cycle. As
can be seen from the conditions above,
other terms such as ‘‘one cycle’’ have
been used. To be unambiguous and
ensure that a suitable re-inspection
frequency has been established when
the cause of the degradation is unknown
or when the potential for hydrogen
cracking exists due to the welding
conditions, the term ‘‘next refueling
outage’’ has been adopted in condition
(a) rather than the term ‘‘one cycle.’’
There is no change needed regarding
condition (c).
With regard to condition (b) on Code
Case N–661, ASME made technical
changes to the code case to address the
NRC’s concerns. The NRC finds the
changes acceptable and thus condition
(b) has been deleted relative to the
implementation of Code Case N–661–1.
Code Case N–751 [S11]
Type: New.
Title: Pressure Testing of Containment
Penetration Piping, Section XI, Division
1—When a 10 CFR [Part] 50,
Appendix[–]J, Type[–]C, test is
performed as an alternative to the
requirements of IWA–4540 (IWA–4700
in the 1989 edition through the 1995
edition) during repair and replacement
activities, nondestructive examination
must be performed in accordance with
IWA–4540(a)(2) of the 2002 Addenda of
Section XI.
The code case would allow an
Appendix–J Type–C test to be
performed as an alternative to the ASME
Code requirement to pressure test
piping that penetrates a containment
vessel if the piping and isolation valves
that are part of the containment system
are Class 2 and the balance of the piping
system is outside the scope of Section
XI. However, in IWA–4540 of the 2003
addenda and later edition and addenda
of the ASME Code, the NDE
requirement associated with the system
leakage test has been removed. For the
plants that used the ASME B31.1 Code
for construction, there was no
requirement to volumetrically examine
certain piping components during
fabrication. Section XI requires NDE per
the construction code as part of repair/
replacement activities. Thus, if a B31.1
plant performs a repair to certain Class
2 or Class 3 piping, the construction
code does not contain a provision for
the NDE (as required by Section XI).
Volumetric examination after repair or
replacement is required to ensure high
quality welds. A pressure test is only
capable of determining the leak-
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
tightness of a weld at the time of the
pressure test. Volumetric examination
ensures high quality welds capable of
performing their design function for the
life of the component. Therefore, the
NRC proposes a limitation on the use of
Code Case N–751 so that when a 10 CFR
Part 50, Appendix–J, Type–C test is
performed as an alternative to the
requirements of IWA–4540 (IWA–4700
in the 1989 edition through the 1995
edition) during repair and replacement
activities, NDE must be performed in
accordance with IWA–4540(a)(2) of the
2002 Addenda of Section XI.
ASME Code Cases Not Approved for
Use
ASME Code Cases which are
currently issued by the ASME but not
approved for generic use by the NRC are
listed in RG 1.193, ‘‘ASME Code Cases
Not Approved for Use.’’ The ASME
Code Cases which are not approved for
use include those code cases on hightemperature gas-cooled reactors; certain
requirements in Section III, Division 2,
that are not endorsed by the NRC; liquid
metal; and submerged spent fuel waste
casks. RG 1.193 complements RGs 1.84
and 1.147. It should be noted that RG
1.193 is not part of this rulemaking as
the NRC is not proposing to adopt any
of the code cases listed in this RG. Also,
the NRC is not seeking public comment
on whether the NRC should approve
any of the ASME Code Cases in RG
1.193. The RG is merely discussed as a
matter of completeness.
Paragraph-by-Paragraph Discussion
Overall Considerations on the Use of
ASME Code Cases
This rulemaking would amend 10
CFR 50.55a to incorporate by reference
RG 1.84, Revision 35, which would
supersede Revision 34, and RG 1.147,
Revision 16, which would supersede
Revision 15. The following general
guidance applies to the use of the ASME
Code Cases approved in the latest
versions of the regulatory guides which
are incorporated by reference into 10
CFR 50.55a as part of this rulemaking.
The endorsement of a code case in
NRC RGs constitutes acceptance of its
technical position for applications
which are not precluded by regulatory
or other requirements or by the
recommendations in these or other RGs.
The applicant and licensee are
responsible for ensuring that use of the
code case does not conflict with
regulatory requirements or licensee
commitments. The code cases listed in
the RGs are acceptable for use within
the limits specified in the code case. If
the RG states an NRC condition on the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:00 Jun 01, 2009
Jkt 217001
use of a code case, then the NRC
condition supplements and does not
supersede any condition(s) specified in
the code case, unless otherwise stated in
the NRC condition.
ASME Code Cases may be revised for
many reasons, e.g., to incorporate
operational examination and testing
experience and to update material
requirements based on research result.
On occasion, an inaccuracy in an
equation is discovered or an
examination, as practiced, is found not
to be adequate to detect a newly
discovered degradation mechanism.
Hence, when an applicant or a licensee
initially implements a code case, 10
CFR 50.55a requires that the applicant
or the licensee implement the most
recent version of that code case as listed
in the RGs incorporated by reference.
Code cases superseded by revision are
no longer acceptable for new
application unless otherwise indicated.
Section III of the ASME BPV Code
applies only to new construction (i.e.,
the edition and addenda to be used in
the construction of a plant are selected
based on the date of the construction
permit and are not changed thereafter,
except voluntarily by the applicant or
the licensee). Hence, if a Section III code
case is implemented by an applicant or
a licensee and a later version of the code
case is incorporated by reference into
§ 50.55a and listed in the RGs, the
applicant or the licensee may use either
version of the code case (subject,
however, to whatever change
requirements apply to its licensing
basis, e.g., 10 CFR 50.59).
A licensee’s ISI and OM IST programs
must be updated every 10 years to the
latest edition and addenda of Section XI
and the OM Code, respectively, that
were incorporated by reference to 10
CFR 50.55a and in effect 12 months
prior to the start of the next inspection
and testing interval. Licensees who were
using a code case prior to the effective
date of its revision may continue to use
the previous version for the remainder
of the 120-month ISI or IST interval.
This relieves licensees of the burden of
having to update their ISI or IST
program each time a code case is revised
by the ASME and approved for use by
the NRC. Since code cases apply to
specific editions and addenda and since
code cases may be revised because they
are no longer accurate or adequate,
licensees choosing to continue using a
code case during the subsequent ISI
interval must implement the latest
version incorporated by reference into
10 CFR 50.55a and listed in the RGs.
The ASME may annul code cases that
are no longer required, are determined
to be inaccurate or inadequate, or have
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26307
been incorporated into the BPV or OM
Codes. If an applicant or a licensee
applied a code case before it was listed
as annulled or expired, the applicant or
the licensee may continue to use the
code case until the applicant or the
licensee updates its construction Code
of Record (in the case of an applicant,
updates its application) or until the
licensee’s 120-month ISI/IST update
interval expires, after which the
continued use of the code case is
prohibited unless NRC approval is
granted under 10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3). If a
code case is incorporated by reference
into 10 CFR 50.55a and later annulled
by the ASME because experience has
shown that the design analysis,
construction method, examination
method, or testing method is
inadequate; the NRC will amend 10 CFR
50.55a and the relevant RG to remove
the approval of the annulled code case.
Applicants and licensees should not
begin to implement such annulled code
cases in advance of the rulemaking.
Concurrent with this action, the NRC
is publishing in the Federal Register
Notices of availability of these RGs
listing acceptable ASME BPV Code
Cases.
Paragraph 50.55a(b)
In paragraphs (b), and (b)(4) of 10 CFR
50.55a, the reference to the revision
number for RG 1.84 would be changed
from ‘‘Revision 34’’ to ‘‘Revision 35.’’ In
paragraph (b)(5) of 10 CFR 50.55a, the
reference to the revision number for RG
1.147 would be changed from ‘‘Revision
15’’ to ‘‘Revision 16.’’;
Paragraph 50.55a(f)(2), (f)(3)(iii)(A),
(f)(3)(iv)(A), (f)(4)(ii), (g)(2), (g)(3)(i),
(g)(3)(ii), (g)(4)(i), and (g)(4)(ii)
In paragraphs (f)(2), (f)(3)(iii)(A),
(f)(3)(iv)(A), (f)(4)(ii), (g)(2), (g)(3)(i),
(g)(3)(ii), (g)(4)(i), and (g)(4)(ii) of 10
CFR 50.55a, the reference to the revision
number for RG 1.147 would be changed
from ‘‘Revision 15’’ to ‘‘Revision 16.’’
Availability of Documents
The NRC is making the documents
identified below available to interested
persons through one or more of the
following:
Public Document Room (PDR). The
NRC PDR is located at 11555 Rockville
Pike, Public File Area O–1F21,
Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. The
Web site is located at https://
regulations.gov.
The NRC’s Public Electronic Reading
Room. The NRC’s public electronic
reading room is located at https://
www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html.
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
26308
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
TABLE 2
Document
PDR
Web
Proposed Rule—Regulatory Analysis ...................................................................................................
RG 1.84, Revision 35 (DG1191) ...........................................................................................................
RG 1.147, Revision 16 (DG1192) .........................................................................................................
RG 1.193, Revision 2 (DG1193) ...........................................................................................................
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act of 1995, Public
Law 104–113, requires agencies to use
technical standards developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies unless the use of such
standards is inconsistent with
applicable law or is otherwise
impractical. In this action, the NRC is
amending its regulations to incorporate
by reference RGs that list ASME BPV
Code Cases approved by the NRC.
ASME Code Cases, which are ASMEapproved alternatives to the provisions
of ASME Code editions and addenda,
are national consensus standards as
defined in Public Law 104–113 and
OMB Circular A–119. They are
developed by bodies whose members
(including the NRC and utilities) have
broad and varied interests.
The NRC reviews each Section III and
Section XI Code Case published by the
ASME to ascertain whether it is
consistent with the safe operation of
nuclear power plants. Those code cases
found to be generically acceptable are
listed in the RGs that are incorporated
by reference in 10 CFR 50.55a(b). Those
that are found to be unacceptable are
listed in RG 1.193, but licensees may
still seek NRC’s approval to apply these
code cases through the relief request
process permitted in 10 CFR
50.55a(a)(3). Other code cases, which
the NRC finds to be conditionally
acceptable, are also listed in the RGs
that are incorporated by reference along
with the conditions under which they
may be applied. If the NRC did not
conditionally accept ASME code cases,
it would disapprove these code cases
entirely. The effect would be that
licensees would need to submit a larger
number of relief requests, which would
be an unnecessary additional burden for
both the licensee and the NRC. For these
reasons, the treatment of ASME BPV
and OM Code Cases and any conditions
proposed to be placed on them in this
proposed rule does not conflict with any
policy on agency use of consensus
standards specified in OMB Circular
A–119.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:00 Jun 01, 2009
Jkt 217001
Finding of No Significant
Environmental Impact: Environmental
Assessment
This proposed action stems from the
Commission’s practice of incorporating
by reference the RGs listing the most
recent set of NRC-approved ASME code
cases. The purpose of this proposed
action is to allow licensees to use the
code cases listed in the RGs as
alternatives to requirements in the
ASME BPV Code for the construction
and ISI of nuclear power plant
components. This proposed action is
intended to advance the NRC’s strategic
goal of ensuring adequate protection of
public health and safety and the
environment. It also demonstrates the
agency’s commitment to participate in
the national consensus standards
process under the National Technology
Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–113.
The National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) requires Federal
government agencies to study the
impacts of their ‘‘major Federal actions
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment’’ and prepare
detailed statements on the
environmental impacts of the action and
alternatives to the action (United States
Code, Vol. 42, Section 4332(C) [42
U.S.C. Sec. 4332(C)]; NEPA Sec. 102(C)).
The Commission has determined
under NEPA, as amended, and the
Commission’s regulations in Subpart A
of 10 CFR Part 51 that this proposed
rule would not be a major Federal action
significantly affecting the quality of the
human environment. Therefore, an
environmental impact statement is not
required.
As alternatives to the ASME Code,
NRC-approved code cases provide an
equivalent level of safety. Therefore, the
probability or consequences of accidents
is not changed. There are also no
significant, non-radiological impacts
associated with this action because no
changes would be made affecting nonradiological plant effluents and because
no changes would be made in activities
that would adversely affect the
environment. The determination of this
environmental assessment is that there
will be no significant offsite impact to
the public from this proposed action.
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
e-Reading room
ML082540559
ML080910389
ML080910245
ML080920854
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
This proposed rule increases the
burden on licensees applying ASME
Code Case N–730 to maintain repair
records of the current control drive
bottom head penetrations in BWRs for
the life of the reactor vessel (10 CFR
50.55a). The public burden for this
information collection is estimated to
average 5 hours per request. Because the
burden for this information collection is
insignificant, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) clearance is not required.
Existing requirements were approved by
the OMB approval number 3150–0011.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a request for information or an
information collection unless the
requesting document displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
Regulatory Analysis
The ASME Code Cases listed in the
RGs to be incorporated by reference
provide voluntary alternatives to the
provisions in the ASME BPV Code for
design, construction, and ISI of specific
structures, systems, and components
used in nuclear power plants.
Implementation of these code cases is
not required. Licensees use NRCapproved ASME Code Cases to reduce
unnecessary regulatory burden or gain
additional operational flexibility. It
would be difficult for the NRC to
provide these advantages independently
of the ASME Code Case publication
process without expending considerable
additional resources. The NRC has
prepared a regulatory analysis
addressing the qualitative benefits of the
alternatives considered in this proposed
rulemaking and comparing the costs
associated with each alternative. The
regulatory analysis is available for
inspection on public computers in the
NRC PDR, located at One White Flint
North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852, Room O–1 F21. Copies
of the regulatory analysis are also
available to the public as indicated
under the Availability of Documents
heading in this preamble.
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Regulatory Flexibility Certification
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the
Commission certifies that this proposed
rule would not impose a significant
economical impact on a substantial
number of small entities. This proposed
rule would affect only the licensing and
operation of nuclear power plants. The
companies that own these plants are not
‘‘small entities’’ as defined in the
Regulatory Flexibility Act or the size
standards established by the NRC (10
CFR 2.810).
Backfitting Analysis
The provisions in this proposed
rulemaking would allow licensees to
voluntarily apply NRC-approved code
cases, sometimes with conditions. The
voluntary implementation of an
approved code case would not
constitute a backfit. Thus, the
Commission finds that this proposed
rule does not involve any provisions
that constitute a backfit as defined in 10
CFR 50.109(a)(1) and that a backfit rule
is not required. Accordingly, a backfit
analysis has not been prepared for this
rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 50
Antitrust, Classified information,
Criminal penalties, Fire protection,
Incorporation by reference,
Intergovernmental relations, Nuclear
power plants and reactors, Radiation
protection, Reactor siting criteria,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, and under the authority of the
Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended;
the Energy Reorganization Act of 1974,
as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 553, the NRC
proposes to adopt the following
amendments to 10 CFR Part 50.
PART 50—DOMESTIC LICENSING OF
PRODUCTION AND UTILIZATION
FACILITIES
1. The authority citation for Part 50 is
revised to read as follows:
Authority: Secs. 102, 103, 104, 105, 161,
182, 183, 186, 189, 68 Stat. 936, 937, 938,
948, 953, 954, 955, 956, as amended, sec.
234, 83 Stat. 444, as amended (42 U.S.C.
2132, 2133, 2134, 2135, 2201, 2232, 2233,
2236, 2239, 2282); secs. 201, as amended,
202, 206, 88 Stat. 1242, as amended, 1244,
1246 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842, 5846); sec. 1704,
112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note); Energy
Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109–58, 119 Stat.
194 (2005).
Section 50.7 also issued under Pub. L. 95–
601, sec. 10, 92 Stat. 2951 as amended by
Pub. L. 102–486, sec. 2902, 106 Stat. 3123 (42
U.S.C. 5841), Section 50.10 also issued under
secs. 101, 185, 68 Stat. 955, as amended (42
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:00 Jun 01, 2009
Jkt 217001
U.S.C. 2131, 2235); sec. 102, Pub. L. 91–190,
83 Stat. 853 (42 U.S.C. 4332). Sections 50.13,
50.54(d), and 50.103 also issued under sec.
108, 68 Stat. 939, as amended (42 U.S.C.
2138). Sections 50.23, 50.35, 50.55, and 50.56
also issued under sec. 185, 68 Stat. 955 (42
U.S.C. 2235). Sections 50.33a, 50.55a and
Appendix Q also issued under sec. 102, Pub.
L. 91–190, 83 Stat. 853 (42 U.S.C. 4332).
Sections 50.34 and 50.54 also issued under
sec. 204, 88 Stat. 1245 (42 U.S.C. 5844).
Sections 50.58, 50.91, and 50.92 also issued
under Pub. L. 97–415, 96 Stat. 2073 (42
U.S.C. 2239). Section 50.78 also issued under
sec. 122, 68 Stat. 939 (42 U.S.C. 2152).
Sections 50.80–50.81 also issued under sec.
184, 68 Stat. 954, as amended (42 U.S.C.
2234). Appendix F also issued under sec.
187, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C. 2237).
2. Section 50.55a is amended by
revising the introductory text of
paragraphs (b), (b)(4), and (b)(5), and
paragraphs (f)(2), (f)(3)(iii)(A),
(f)(3)(iv)(A), (f)(4)(ii), (g)(2), (g)(3)(i),
(g)(3)(ii), (g)(4)(i) and (g)(4)(ii) to read as
follows:
§ 50.55a
Codes and Standards.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) The ASME Boiler and Pressure
Vessel Code and the ASME Code for
Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear
Power Plants, which are referenced in
paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(3) of
this section, were approved for
incorporation by reference by the
Director of the Office of the Federal
Register pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and
1 CFR part 51. NRC Regulatory Guide
1.84, Revision 35, ‘‘Design, Fabrication,
and Materials Code Case Acceptability,
ASME Section III’’ [temporarily
designated DG–1191]; NRC Regulatory
Guide 1.147, Revision 16, ‘‘Inservice
Inspection Code Case Acceptability,
ASME Section XI, Division 1’’
[temporarily designated DG–1192]; and
Regulatory Guide 1.192, ‘‘Operation and
Maintenance Code Case Acceptability,
ASME OM Code,’’ (June 2003), have
been approved for incorporation by
reference by the Director of the Office of
the Federal Register pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. These
Regulatory Guides list ASME Code cases
that the NRC has approved in
accordance with the requirements in
paragraphs (b)(4), (b)(5), and (b)(6) of
this section. Copies of the ASME Boiler
and Pressure Vessel Code and the ASME
Code for Operation and Maintenance of
Nuclear Power Plants may be purchased
from the American Society of
Mechanical Engineers, Three Park
Avenue, New York, NY 10016. Single
copies of NRC Regulatory Guides 1.84,
Revision 35; 1.147, Revision 16; and
1.192 may be obtained free of charge by
writing the Reproduction and
Distribution Services Section, U.S.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
26309
Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555–0001; or by fax
to 301–415–2289; or by e-mail to
Distribution.Resource@nrc.gov. Copies
of the ASME Codes and NRC Regulatory
Guides incorporated by reference in this
section may be inspected at the NRC
Technical Library, Two White Flint
North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
MD 20852–2738, or at the National
Archives and Records Administration
(NARA). For information on the
availability of this material at NARA,
call 202–741–6030, or go to: https://
www.archives.gov/federal register/code
of federal regulations/ibr locations.html.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) Design, Fabrication, and Materials
Code Cases. Applicants and licensees
may apply the ASME Boiler and
Pressure Vessel Code cases listed in
NRC Regulatory Guide 1.84, Revision 35
without prior NRC approval subject to
the following:
*
*
*
*
*
(5) In-service Inspection Code Cases.
Licensees may apply the ASME Boiler
and Pressure Vessel Code cases listed in
Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision 16,
without prior NRC approval subject to
the following:
*
*
*
*
*
(f) * * *
(2) For a boiling or pressurized watercooled nuclear power facility whose
construction permit was issued on or
after January 1, 1971, but before July 1,
1974, pumps and valves which are
classified as ASME Code Class 1 and
Class 2 must be designed and be
provided with access to enable the
performance of inservice tests for
operational readiness set forth in
editions and addenda of Section XI of
the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel
Code incorporated by reference in
paragraph (b) of this section (or the
optional ASME Code cases listed in
NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision
16; or Regulatory Guide 1.192 that are
incorporated by reference in paragraph
(b) of this section) in effect 6 months
before the date of issuance of the
construction permit. The pumps and
valves may meet the inservice test
requirements set forth in subsequent
editions of this Code and addenda
which are incorporated by reference in
paragraph (b) of this section (or the
optional ASME Code Cases listed in
NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision
16; or Regulatory Guide 1.192 that are
incorporated by reference in paragraph
(b) of this section), subject to the
applicable limitations and modifications
listed therein.
(3) * * *
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
26310
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 104 / Tuesday, June 2, 2009 / Proposed Rules
(iii) (A) Pumps and valves, in
facilities whose construction permit was
issued before November 22, 1999, which
are classified as ASME Code Class 1
must be designed and be provided with
access to enable the performance of
inservice testing of the pumps and
valves for assessing operational
readiness set forth in the editions and
addenda of Section XI of the ASME
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code
incorporated by reference in paragraph
(b) of this section (or the optional ASME
Code cases listed in NRC Regulatory
Guide 1.147, Revision 16; or Regulatory
Guide 1.192 that are incorporated by
reference in paragraph (b) of this
section) applied to the construction of
the particular pump or valve or the
Summer 1973 Addenda, whichever is
later.
*
*
*
*
*
(iv)(A) Pumps and valves, in facilities
whose construction permit was issued
before November 22, 1999, which are
classified as ASME Code Class 2 and
Class 3 must be designed and be
provided with access to enable the
performance of inservice testing of the
pumps and valves for assessing
operational readiness set forth in the
editions and addenda of Section XI of
the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel
Code incorporated by reference in
paragraph (b) of this section (or the
optional ASME Code Cases listed in
NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision
16, that are incorporated by reference in
paragraph (b) of this section) applied to
the construction of the particular pump
or valve or the Summer 1973 Addenda,
whichever is later.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(ii) Inservice tests to verify
operational readiness of pumps and
valves, whose function is required for
safety, conducted during successive
120-month intervals must comply with
the requirements of the latest edition
and addenda of the Code incorporated
by reference in paragraph (b) of this
section 12 months before the start of the
120-month interval (or the optional
ASME Code cases listed in NRC
Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision 16; or
Regulatory Guide 1.192 that are
incorporated by reference in paragraph
(b) of this section), subject to the
conditions listed in paragraph (b) of this
section.
*
*
*
*
*
(g) * * *
(2) For a boiling or pressurized watercooled nuclear power facility whose
construction permit was issued on or
after January 1, 1971, but before July 1,
1974, components (including supports)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:00 Jun 01, 2009
Jkt 217001
which are classified as ASME Code
Class 1 and Class 2 must be designed
and be provided with access to enable
the performance of inservice
examination of such components
(including supports) and must meet the
preservice examination requirements set
forth in editions and addenda of Section
XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure
Vessel Code incorporated by reference
in paragraph (b) of this section (or the
optional ASME Code cases listed in
NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision
16, that are incorporated by reference in
paragraph (b) of this section) in effect 6
months before the date of issuance of
the construction permit. The
components (including supports) may
meet the requirements set forth in
subsequent editions and addenda of this
Code which are incorporated by
reference in paragraph (b) of this section
(or the optional ASME Code cases listed
in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147,
Revision 16, that are incorporated by
reference in paragraph (b) of this
section), subject to the applicable
limitations and modifications.
(3) * * *
(i) Components (including supports)
which are classified as ASME Code
Class 1 must be designed and be
provided with access to enable the
performance of inservice examination of
these components and must meet the
preservice examination requirements set
forth in the editions and addenda of
Section XI of the ASME Boiler and
Pressure Vessel Code incorporated by
reference in paragraph (b) of this section
(or the optional ASME Code cases listed
in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147,
Revision 16, that are incorporated by
reference in paragraph (b) of this
section) applied to the construction of
the particular component.
(ii) Components which are classified
as ASME Code Class 2 and Class 3 and
supports for components which are
classified as ASME Code Class 1, Class
2, and Class 3 must be designed and be
provided with access to enable the
performance of inservice examination of
these components and must meet the
preservice examination requirements set
forth in the editions and addenda of
Section XI of the ASME Boiler and
Pressure Vessel Code incorporated by
reference in paragraph (b) of this section
(or the optional ASME Code Cases listed
in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147,
Revision 16, that are incorporated by
reference in paragraph (b) of this
section) applied to the construction of
the particular component.
*
*
*
*
*
(4) * * *
(i) Inservice examination of
components and system pressure tests
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
conducted during the initial 120-month
inspection interval must comply with
the requirements in the latest edition
and addenda of the Code incorporated
by reference in paragraph (b) of this
section on the date 12 months before the
date of issuance of the operating license
(or the optional ASME Code cases listed
in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147,
Revision 16, that are incorporated by
reference in paragraph (b) of this
section, subject to the conditions listed
in paragraph (b) of this section.
(ii) Inservice examination of
components and system pressure tests
conducted during successive 120-month
inspection intervals must comply with
the requirements of the latest edition
and addenda of the Code incorporated
by reference in paragraph (b) of this
section 12 months before the start of the
120-month inspection interval (or the
optional ASME Code cases listed in
NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision
16, that are incorporated by reference in
paragraph (b) of this section), subject to
the conditions listed in paragraph (b) of
this section.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day
of May 2009.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
R.W. Borchardt,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. E9–12751 Filed 6–1–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590–01–P
NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 72
RIN 3150–AI60
[NRC–2009–0132]
List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage
Casks: HI–STORM 100 Revision 6
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory
Commission.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is proposing to
amend its spent fuel storage cask
regulations by revising the Holtec
International HI–STORM 100 dry
storage cask system listing within the
‘‘List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage
Casks’’ to include Amendment No. 6 to
Certificate of Compliance (CoC) Number
1014. Amendment No. 6 would modify
the CoC to add instrument tube tie rods
used for pressurized water reactor 15x15
and 17x17 fuel lattices, for both intact
and damaged fuel assemblies, to the
approved contents of the MPC–24,
MPC–24E, MPC–24EF, MPC–32, and
E:\FR\FM\02JNP1.SGM
02JNP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 104 (Tuesday, June 2, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 26303-26310]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12751]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
10 CFR Part 50
RIN 3150-AI37
[NRC 2009-0014]
Incorporation by Reference of Regulatory Guide 1.84, Revision 35,
and Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision 16, Into 10 CFR 50.55a
AGENCY: Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The NRC is proposing to amend its regulations to incorporate
by reference the latest revisions of two regulatory guides (RG) that
would approve new and revised code cases published by the American
Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME). These are RG 1.84, ``Design,
Fabrication, and Materials Code Case Acceptability, ASME Section III,''
Revision 35, and RG 1.147, ``Inservice Inspection Code Case
Acceptability, ASME Section XI, Division 1,'' Revision 16. This action
would allow the use of the code cases listed in these RGs as
alternatives to requirements in the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel
(BPV) Code regarding the construction and inservice inspection (ISI) of
nuclear power plant components. Concurrent with this action, the NRC is
publishing a notice of the issuance and availability of the RGs in the
Federal Register.
DATES: Submit comments by August 17, 2009. Comments received after this
date will be considered if it is practical to do so, but the Commission
is able to ensure consideration only of comments received on or before
this date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by any one of the following methods.
Please include the number RN 3150-AI37 in the subject line of your
comments. Comments submitted in writing or in electronic form will be
made available for public inspection. Because your comments will not be
edited to remove any identifying or contact information, the NRC
cautions you against including any information in your submission that
you do not want to be publicly disclosed.
Federal e Rulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and
search for documents filed under Docket ID NRC-2009-0014. Address
questions about NRC dockets to Carol Gallagher at 301-492-3668, e-mail
Carol.Gallager@nrc.gov.
Mail comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,
Washington, DC 20555-0001, Attn: Rulemakings and Adjudications Staff.
E-mail comments to: Rulemaking.Comments@nrc.gov. If you do not
receive a reply e-mail confirming that we have received your comments,
contact us directly at 301-415-1677.
Fax comments to: Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission at
301-415-1101.
Publicly available documents related to this rulemaking, including
comments, may be viewed electronically on the public computers located
at the NRC's Public Document Room (PDR), O1-F21, One White Flint North,
11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland 20852. The PDR reproduction
contractor will copy documents for a fee.
Publicly available documents created or received at the NRC after
November 1, 1999, are available electronically at the NRC's Electronic
Reading Room at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html. From this
site, the public can gain entry into ADAMS, which provides text and
image files of NRC's public documents. If you do not have access to
ADAMS or if there are problems in accessing the documents
[[Page 26304]]
located in ADAMS, contact the PDR Reference staff at 800-397-4209, 301-
415-4737, or by e-mail to pdr.resource@nrc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Manash K. Bagchi or L. M. Padovan,
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001, telephone 301-415-2905, e-mail
Manash.Bagchi@nrc.gov, or 301-415-1423, e-mail Mark.Padovan@nrc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The ASME develops and publishes the ASME BPV Code, which contains
requirements for the design, construction, and ISI of nuclear power
plant components, and the Code for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear
Power Plants (OM Code), which contains requirements for inservice
testing (IST) of nuclear power plant components. In response to BPV and
OM Code user requests, the ASME develops ASME Code Cases which provide
alternatives to BPV and OM Code requirements under special
circumstances.
The NRC approves and/or mandates the use of the ASME BPV and OM
Code in 10 CFR 50.55a through the process of incorporation by
reference. As such, each provision of the ASME Codes incorporated by
reference into, and mandated by, Sec. 50.55a constitutes a legally-
binding NRC requirement imposed by rule. As noted above, ASME Code
Cases, for the most part, represent alternative approaches for
complying with provisions of the ASME BPV and OM Codes. Accordingly,
the NRC periodically amends Sec. 50.55 to incorporate by reference NRC
RGs listing approved ASME Code Cases which may be used as alternatives
to the BPV Code and the OM Code. See 68 FR 40469 (July 8, 2003).
This rulemaking is the latest in a series of rulemakings which
incorporate by reference new versions of several RGs identifying new
and revised \1\ ASME Code Cases which are approved for use, either
unconditionally or with conditions. In developing these RGs, the NRC
staff reviews ASME BPV and OM Code Cases, determines the acceptability
of each Code Case, and publishes its findings in RGs. The RGs are
revised periodically as new code cases are published by the ASME. The
NRC incorporates by reference the RGs listing acceptable and
conditionally acceptable ASME Code Cases into 10 CFR 50.55a. Currently,
NRC RG 1.84, Revision 34, ``Design, Fabrication, and Materials Code
Case Acceptability, ASME Section III;'' RG 1.147, Revision 15,
``Inservice Inspection Code Case Acceptability, ASME Section XI,
Division 1;'' and RG 1.192, ``Operation and Maintenance Code Case
Acceptability, ASME OM Code,'' are incorporated into the NRC's
regulations at 10 CFR 50.55a, Codes and standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ ASME Code Cases can be categorized as one of one of two
types: new and revised. A new Code Case provides for the first time
an alternative to specific ASME Code provisions or addresses a new
need. A revised Code Case is a revision (modification) to an
existing Code Case to address, for example, technological
advancements in examination techniques or to address NRC conditions
imposed in one of the regulatory guides which have been incorporated
by reference into 10 CFR 50.55a.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Description of NRC Approval of New and Amended ASME Code Cases
This proposed rule would incorporate by reference the latest
revisions of the NRC RGs that list acceptable and conditionally
acceptable ASME BPV Code Cases. RG 1.84, Revision 35, Draft Regulatory
Guide (DG) 1191, would supersede the incorporation by reference of
Revision 34; and RG 1.147, Revision 16, DG 1192, would supersede the
incorporation by reference of Revision 15. RG 1192 dated June 2003
would not be revised because there have been no new OM Code Cases
published by the ASME since the last NRC staff review.
The ASME Code Cases which are the subject of this rulemaking are
the new revised Section III and Section XI Code Cases listed in
Supplements 2 through 11 to the 2004 BPV Code, and Supplement 0
published with the 2007 Edition of the BPV Code (Supplement 0 also
serves as Supplement 12 to the 2004 Edition) of the code. The NRC
follows a three step process to determine acceptability of new and
revised ASME Code Cases and the need for conditions on the uses of
these Code Cases. This process was employed in the review of the ASME
Code Cases which are the subject of this proposed rule. First, NRC
staff actively participates with other ASME committee members with full
involvement in discussions and technical debates in the development of
new and revised code cases. This includes a technical justification in
support of each new or revised code case. Second, the NRC committee
representatives distribute the code case and technical justification to
other cognizant NRC staff to ensure an adequate technical review.
Finally, the proposed NRC position on each code case is reviewed and
approved by NRC management as part of the rulemaking amending 10 CFR
50.55a to incorporate by reference new revisions of the RGs listing the
relevant ASME Code Cases and conditions on their use. This regulatory
process, when considered together with the ASME's own process for
development and approval of ASME Code Cases, provides reasonable
assurances that the NRC approves for use only those new and revised
ASME Code Cases (with conditions as necessary) which provide reasonable
assurance of adequate protection to public health and safety and which
do not have significant adverse impacts on the environment.
Code Cases Approved Unconditionally for Use
The NRC concluded, in accordance with the process for review of
ASME Code Cases, that each of the ASME Code Cases listed in Table 1 is
technically adequate and consistent with current NRC regulations.
Table 1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Code case No. Supplement Title
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section III
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N-4-12..................................... 4 Special Type 403 Modified Forgings or Bars, Class and
CS, Section III, Division 1.
N-284-2.................................... 12 Metal Containment Shell Buckling Design Methods, Class
MC, Section III, Division 1.
N-373-3.................................... 3 Alternative postweld heat treatment (PWHT) Time at
Temperature for P-No. 5A or P-No. 5B Group 1
Material, Classes 1, 2, and 3 Section III, Division
1.
N-621-1.................................... 3 Ni-Cr-Mo Alloy Unified Numbering System (UNS) N06022)
Weld Construction to 800 [deg]F, Section III,
Division 1.
[[Page 26305]]
N-699...................................... 8 Use of Titanium Grade 2 (UNS R50400) Tube and Bar, and
Grade 1 (UNS R50250) Plate and Sheet for Class 1
Construction, Section III, Division 1.
N-725...................................... 4 Design Stress Values for UNS N06690 With Minimum
Specified Yield Strength of 35 Ksi (240 Mpa), Classes
2 and 3 Components, Section III, Division 1.
N-727...................................... 9 Dissimilar Welding Using Continuous Drive Friction
Welding for Reactor Vessel Control Rod Drive
Mechanism (CRDM)/Control Element Drive Mechanism
(CEDM) Nozzle to Flange/Adapter Welds, Class 1,
Section III, Division 1.
N-732...................................... 5 Magnetic Particle Examination of Forgings for
Construction, Section III, Division 1.
N-736...................................... 8 Use UNS S32050 Welded and Seamless Pipe and Tubing,
Forgings, and Plates Conforming to SA-249/SA-249M, SA-
479/SA-479M, and SA-240/SA-240M, and Grade CK35MN
Castings Conforming to ASTM A 743-03 for Construction
of Class 1, 2, and 3 Components, Section III,
Division 1.
N-738...................................... 6 NDE of Full Penetration Butt Welds in Class 2
Supports, Section III, Division 1.
N-741...................................... 7 Use of 22Cr-5Ni-3Mo-N (Alloy UNS S32205 Austenitic/
Ferritic Duplex Stainless Steel) Forgings, Plate,
Welded and Seamless Pipe Tubing, and Fittings to SA-
182, SA-240, SA-789, A 790-04a, SA-815, Classes 2 and
3, Section III, Division 1.
N-744...................................... 11 Use of Metric Units Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code,
Section III, Division 1.
N-746...................................... 8 Use of 46Fe-24Ni-21Cr-6Mo-Cu-N (UNS N08367) Bolting
Materials for Class 2 and 3 Components, Section III,
Division 1.
N-756...................................... 12 Alternative Rules for Acceptability for Class 1
Valves, nominal pipe size (NPS) diameter nominelle
(DN 25) and Smaller with Non-Welded End Connections
Other than Flanges, Section III, Division III
N-759...................................... 11 Alternative Rules for Determining Allowable External
Pressure and Compressive Stresses for Cylinders,
Cones, Spheres, and Formed Heads, Section III,
Division 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section XI
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
N-494-4.................................... 7 Pipe Specific Evaluation Procedures and Acceptance
Criteria for Flaws in Piping that Exceed the
Acceptance Standards, Section XI, Division 1.
N-496-2.................................... 2 Reaffirmed Helical-Coil Threaded Inserts, Section XI,
Division 1.
N-666...................................... 9 Weld Overlay of Class 1, 2, and 3 Socket Welded
Connections, Section XI, Division 1.
N-686-1.................................... 12 Alternative Requirements for Visual Examinations VT-1,
VT-2, and VT-3, Section XI, Division 1.
N-705...................................... 11 Evaluation Criteria for Temporary Acceptance of
Degradation in Moderate Energy Class 2 or 3 Vessels
and Tanks, Section XI, Division 1.
N-706-1.................................... 12 Alternative Examination Requirements of Table IWB-2500-
1 and Table IWC-2500-1 for Pressurized Water Reactor
(PWR) Stainless Steel Residual and Regenerative Heat
Exchangers, Section XI, Division 1.
N-712...................................... 2 Roll Expansion of Class 1 Control Rod Drive Bottom
Head Penetrations in Boiling Water Reactors (BWR),
Section XI, Division 1.
N-730...................................... 11 Class 1 Socket Weld Examinations, Section XI, Division
1.
N-731...................................... 5 Alternative Class 1 System Leakage Test Pressure
Requirements, Section XI, Division 1.
N-733...................................... 6 Mitigation of Flaws in NPS 2 (DN 50) and Smaller
Nozzles and Nozzle Partial Penetration Welds in
Vessels and Piping by Use of a Mechanical Connection
Modification, Section XI, Division 1.
N-735...................................... 11 Successive Inspection of Class 1 and 2 Piping Welds,
Section XI, Division 1.
N-739...................................... 11 Alternative Qualification Requirements for Personnel
Performing Class CC Concrete and Post-tensioning
System Visual Examinations, Section XI, Division 1.
N-753...................................... 10 Vision Tests, Section XI, Division 1.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Code Case Approved for Use With Conditions
As a result of the NRC staff's review, the NRC determined that
certain code cases were technically inadequate or required supplemental
guidance. Accordingly, the NRC proposes to impose conditions upon the
use of these code cases. These ASME Code Cases are included in DG-1191
(RG 1.84, in Table 2, and in DG-1192 (RG-1.147) in Table 2. The NRC's
evaluation of the code cases and the reasons for the NRC's proposed
conditions are discussed in the following paragraphs. Notations have
been made to indicate the conditions duplicated from previous versions
of the regulatory guides.
The NRC requests public comment on these code cases as part of this
rulemaking. It should also be noted that the following paragraphs only
address those code cases for which the NRC proposes to impose condition
which are listed in the regulatory guides for the first time (e.g.,
Code Case N-532-4, which is listed in Supplement 9, has already been
approved in Revision 15 to RG 1.147).
4.5 Section III
Code Case N-570-1 [S8]
Type: Revised.
Title: Alternative Rules for Linear Piping and Linear Standard
Supports for Classes 1, 2, 3, and [Metal Cladding (MC)], Section III,
Division 1.
Code Case N-570-1 references American National Standards Institute
(ANSI)/American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) N690-1994 s1,
``Supplement No. 1 to the Specification for the Design, Fabrication,
and Erection of Steel Safety-Related Structures for Nuclear
Facilities.'' However, the AISC issued Supplement 2 on October 6, 2004.
Supplement 2 supersedes Supplement 1.
The updated supplement (Supplement 2) is consistent with NRC
positions and requirements for new reactor support design. Thus, the
NRC is proposing to condition Code Case N-570-1 to require that ANSI/
AISC N690-1994 s2, ``Supplement No. 2 to the Specification for the
Design, Fabrication, and Erection of Steel Safety-Related Structures
for Nuclear Facilities,'' be used when this code case is implemented.
[[Page 26306]]
4.6 Section XI
Code Case N-416-4 [S1]
Type: Revised.
Title: Alternative Pressure Test Requirement for Welded Repairs or
Installation of Replacement Items by Welding, Class 1, 2, and 3,
Section XI, Division 1.
The NRC proposes to condition Code Case N-416-4 to require that
nondestructive examination be performed for welded or brazed repairs
and fabrication and installation joints in accordance with the methods
and acceptance criteria of the applicable subsection of the 1992
Edition of Section III.
For certain welding repairs or replacements, the previous version
of this code case (Code Case N-416-3) permitted a system leakage test
to be performed in lieu of performing a hydrostatic pressure test
provided that certain requirements are met. One of the requirements was
that nondestructive examination (NDE) be performed on welded repairs,
fabrication, and installation joints in accordance with the methods and
acceptance criteria of the applicable subsection of the 1992 Edition of
Section III.
This NDE requirement was removed when Code Case N-416-4 was issued.
When Code Case N-416 was originally developed, the NRC agreed to the
performance of system leakage testing in lieu of hydrostatic testing
provided that NDE performed in conjunction with the repair met the
requirements of the 1992 Edition of Section III. The reason for this
stipulation is that some construction codes are less rigorous than
others, depending on when the provisions were developed. The NRC
believes that to justify the elimination of the NDE provision a
hydrostatic pressure test would be required. It is the NRC's position
that a system leakage pressure test does not provide an equivalent
level of safety as a hydrostatic pressure test. The higher pressure of
the hydrostatic pressure test would make any potential leakage more
evident than if a system leakage test was performed, particularly in
the case of smaller defects. In as much as the NRC believes that a
hydrostatic pressure test would not be effective in this situation, the
more rigorous NDE requirements of Section III must be performed (as is
currently required by N-416-3).
As discussed above, the NDE provision is contained in Code Case N-
416-3. Code Case N-416-3 was approved in Revision 14 of Regulatory
Guide 1.147 (August 2005), which has already been implemented by
licensees. Thus, requiring the performance of NDE after these repairs
and replacements is not a new position and is merely the continuation
of current practice. It should be noted that the NDE requirement was
also removed from paragraph IWA-4540(a) of the 2003 Addenda to Section
XI. The NRC imposed a condition similar to the one discussed above for
Code Case N-416-3 in 10 CFR 50.55a on the use of IWA-4540(a) in the
2003 Addendum to Section XI.
Code Case N-504-4 [S10]
Type: Revised.
Title: Alternate Rules for Repair of Classes 1, 2, and 3 Austenitic
Stainless Steel Piping, Section XI, Division 1.
Revision 3 to this code case was conditionally approved in Revision
15 to RG 1.147 to require that Section XI, Nonmandatory Appendix Q,
``Weld Overlay Repair of Class 1, 2, and 3 Austenitic Stainless Steel
Piping Weldments,'' must also be met. The NRC has determined that N-
504-4 is acceptable with the same condition. Accordingly, the
regulatory position has not changed.
Code Case N-638-4 [S11]
Type: Revised.
Title: Similar and Dissimilar Metal Welding Using Ambient
Temperature Machine (GTAW) Temper Bead Technique, Section XI, Division
1.
The same conditions applied to the previous version of the code
case (N-638-1) which was approved in Revision 15 to RG 1.147 (Revisions
2 and 3 to the code case were published by the ASME between regulatory
guide cycles). Accordingly, the NRC's position has not changed.
Code Case N-661-1 [S7]
Type: Revised.
Title: Alternative Requirements for Wall Thickness Restoration of
Class 2 and 3 Carbon Steel Piping for Raw Water Service, Section XI,
Division 1.
With regard to Code Case N-661-1, the NRC is proposing to retain
conditions (a) and (c) of the following three conditions that were
imposed on Code Case N-661 in RG 1.147, Revision 15:
(a) If the root cause of the degradation has not been determined,
the repair is only acceptable for one cycle.
(b) Weld overlay repair of an area can only be performed once in
the same location.
(c) When through-wall repairs are made by welding on surfaces that
are wet or exposed to water, the weld overlay repair is only acceptable
until the next refueling outage.
Code Case N-661-1 uses the term ``one fuel cycle.'' It is unclear
what one fuel cycle actually infers if a repair is performed in mid-
cycle. It may be interpreted that the repair is acceptable for the
remainder of the current fuel cycle plus the subsequent fuel cycle. As
can be seen from the conditions above, other terms such as ``one
cycle'' have been used. To be unambiguous and ensure that a suitable
re-inspection frequency has been established when the cause of the
degradation is unknown or when the potential for hydrogen cracking
exists due to the welding conditions, the term ``next refueling
outage'' has been adopted in condition (a) rather than the term ``one
cycle.'' There is no change needed regarding condition (c).
With regard to condition (b) on Code Case N-661, ASME made
technical changes to the code case to address the NRC's concerns. The
NRC finds the changes acceptable and thus condition (b) has been
deleted relative to the implementation of Code Case N-661-1.
Code Case N-751 [S11]
Type: New.
Title: Pressure Testing of Containment Penetration Piping, Section
XI, Division 1--When a 10 CFR [Part] 50, Appendix[-]J, Type[-]C, test
is performed as an alternative to the requirements of IWA-4540 (IWA-
4700 in the 1989 edition through the 1995 edition) during repair and
replacement activities, nondestructive examination must be performed in
accordance with IWA-4540(a)(2) of the 2002 Addenda of Section XI.
The code case would allow an Appendix-J Type-C test to be performed
as an alternative to the ASME Code requirement to pressure test piping
that penetrates a containment vessel if the piping and isolation valves
that are part of the containment system are Class 2 and the balance of
the piping system is outside the scope of Section XI. However, in IWA-
4540 of the 2003 addenda and later edition and addenda of the ASME
Code, the NDE requirement associated with the system leakage test has
been removed. For the plants that used the ASME B31.1 Code for
construction, there was no requirement to volumetrically examine
certain piping components during fabrication. Section XI requires NDE
per the construction code as part of repair/replacement activities.
Thus, if a B31.1 plant performs a repair to certain Class 2 or Class 3
piping, the construction code does not contain a provision for the NDE
(as required by Section XI). Volumetric examination after repair or
replacement is required to ensure high quality welds. A pressure test
is only capable of determining the leak-
[[Page 26307]]
tightness of a weld at the time of the pressure test. Volumetric
examination ensures high quality welds capable of performing their
design function for the life of the component. Therefore, the NRC
proposes a limitation on the use of Code Case N-751 so that when a 10
CFR Part 50, Appendix-J, Type-C test is performed as an alternative to
the requirements of IWA-4540 (IWA-4700 in the 1989 edition through the
1995 edition) during repair and replacement activities, NDE must be
performed in accordance with IWA-4540(a)(2) of the 2002 Addenda of
Section XI.
ASME Code Cases Not Approved for Use
ASME Code Cases which are currently issued by the ASME but not
approved for generic use by the NRC are listed in RG 1.193, ``ASME Code
Cases Not Approved for Use.'' The ASME Code Cases which are not
approved for use include those code cases on high-temperature gas-
cooled reactors; certain requirements in Section III, Division 2, that
are not endorsed by the NRC; liquid metal; and submerged spent fuel
waste casks. RG 1.193 complements RGs 1.84 and 1.147. It should be
noted that RG 1.193 is not part of this rulemaking as the NRC is not
proposing to adopt any of the code cases listed in this RG. Also, the
NRC is not seeking public comment on whether the NRC should approve any
of the ASME Code Cases in RG 1.193. The RG is merely discussed as a
matter of completeness.
Paragraph-by-Paragraph Discussion
Overall Considerations on the Use of ASME Code Cases
This rulemaking would amend 10 CFR 50.55a to incorporate by
reference RG 1.84, Revision 35, which would supersede Revision 34, and
RG 1.147, Revision 16, which would supersede Revision 15. The following
general guidance applies to the use of the ASME Code Cases approved in
the latest versions of the regulatory guides which are incorporated by
reference into 10 CFR 50.55a as part of this rulemaking.
The endorsement of a code case in NRC RGs constitutes acceptance of
its technical position for applications which are not precluded by
regulatory or other requirements or by the recommendations in these or
other RGs. The applicant and licensee are responsible for ensuring that
use of the code case does not conflict with regulatory requirements or
licensee commitments. The code cases listed in the RGs are acceptable
for use within the limits specified in the code case. If the RG states
an NRC condition on the use of a code case, then the NRC condition
supplements and does not supersede any condition(s) specified in the
code case, unless otherwise stated in the NRC condition.
ASME Code Cases may be revised for many reasons, e.g., to
incorporate operational examination and testing experience and to
update material requirements based on research result. On occasion, an
inaccuracy in an equation is discovered or an examination, as
practiced, is found not to be adequate to detect a newly discovered
degradation mechanism. Hence, when an applicant or a licensee initially
implements a code case, 10 CFR 50.55a requires that the applicant or
the licensee implement the most recent version of that code case as
listed in the RGs incorporated by reference. Code cases superseded by
revision are no longer acceptable for new application unless otherwise
indicated.
Section III of the ASME BPV Code applies only to new construction
(i.e., the edition and addenda to be used in the construction of a
plant are selected based on the date of the construction permit and are
not changed thereafter, except voluntarily by the applicant or the
licensee). Hence, if a Section III code case is implemented by an
applicant or a licensee and a later version of the code case is
incorporated by reference into Sec. 50.55a and listed in the RGs, the
applicant or the licensee may use either version of the code case
(subject, however, to whatever change requirements apply to its
licensing basis, e.g., 10 CFR 50.59).
A licensee's ISI and OM IST programs must be updated every 10 years
to the latest edition and addenda of Section XI and the OM Code,
respectively, that were incorporated by reference to 10 CFR 50.55a and
in effect 12 months prior to the start of the next inspection and
testing interval. Licensees who were using a code case prior to the
effective date of its revision may continue to use the previous version
for the remainder of the 120-month ISI or IST interval. This relieves
licensees of the burden of having to update their ISI or IST program
each time a code case is revised by the ASME and approved for use by
the NRC. Since code cases apply to specific editions and addenda and
since code cases may be revised because they are no longer accurate or
adequate, licensees choosing to continue using a code case during the
subsequent ISI interval must implement the latest version incorporated
by reference into 10 CFR 50.55a and listed in the RGs.
The ASME may annul code cases that are no longer required, are
determined to be inaccurate or inadequate, or have been incorporated
into the BPV or OM Codes. If an applicant or a licensee applied a code
case before it was listed as annulled or expired, the applicant or the
licensee may continue to use the code case until the applicant or the
licensee updates its construction Code of Record (in the case of an
applicant, updates its application) or until the licensee's 120-month
ISI/IST update interval expires, after which the continued use of the
code case is prohibited unless NRC approval is granted under 10 CFR
50.55a(a)(3). If a code case is incorporated by reference into 10 CFR
50.55a and later annulled by the ASME because experience has shown that
the design analysis, construction method, examination method, or
testing method is inadequate; the NRC will amend 10 CFR 50.55a and the
relevant RG to remove the approval of the annulled code case.
Applicants and licensees should not begin to implement such annulled
code cases in advance of the rulemaking.
Concurrent with this action, the NRC is publishing in the Federal
Register Notices of availability of these RGs listing acceptable ASME
BPV Code Cases.
Paragraph 50.55a(b)
In paragraphs (b), and (b)(4) of 10 CFR 50.55a, the reference to
the revision number for RG 1.84 would be changed from ``Revision 34''
to ``Revision 35.'' In paragraph (b)(5) of 10 CFR 50.55a, the reference
to the revision number for RG 1.147 would be changed from ``Revision
15'' to ``Revision 16.'';
Paragraph 50.55a(f)(2), (f)(3)(iii)(A), (f)(3)(iv)(A), (f)(4)(ii),
(g)(2), (g)(3)(i), (g)(3)(ii), (g)(4)(i), and (g)(4)(ii)
In paragraphs (f)(2), (f)(3)(iii)(A), (f)(3)(iv)(A), (f)(4)(ii),
(g)(2), (g)(3)(i), (g)(3)(ii), (g)(4)(i), and (g)(4)(ii) of 10 CFR
50.55a, the reference to the revision number for RG 1.147 would be
changed from ``Revision 15'' to ``Revision 16.''
Availability of Documents
The NRC is making the documents identified below available to
interested persons through one or more of the following:
Public Document Room (PDR). The NRC PDR is located at 11555
Rockville Pike, Public File Area O-1F21, Rockville, Maryland 20852.
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal. The Web site is located at https://regulations.gov.
The NRC's Public Electronic Reading Room. The NRC's public
electronic reading room is located at https://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html.
[[Page 26308]]
Table 2
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Document PDR Web e-Reading room
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Proposed Rule--Regulatory Analysis............ X X ML082540559
RG 1.84, Revision 35 (DG1191)................. X X ML080910389
RG 1.147, Revision 16 (DG1192)................ X X ML080910245
RG 1.193, Revision 2 (DG1193)................. X X ML080920854
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Voluntary Consensus Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995,
Public Law 104-113, requires agencies to use technical standards
developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies unless the
use of such standards is inconsistent with applicable law or is
otherwise impractical. In this action, the NRC is amending its
regulations to incorporate by reference RGs that list ASME BPV Code
Cases approved by the NRC. ASME Code Cases, which are ASME-approved
alternatives to the provisions of ASME Code editions and addenda, are
national consensus standards as defined in Public Law 104-113 and OMB
Circular A-119. They are developed by bodies whose members (including
the NRC and utilities) have broad and varied interests.
The NRC reviews each Section III and Section XI Code Case published
by the ASME to ascertain whether it is consistent with the safe
operation of nuclear power plants. Those code cases found to be
generically acceptable are listed in the RGs that are incorporated by
reference in 10 CFR 50.55a(b). Those that are found to be unacceptable
are listed in RG 1.193, but licensees may still seek NRC's approval to
apply these code cases through the relief request process permitted in
10 CFR 50.55a(a)(3). Other code cases, which the NRC finds to be
conditionally acceptable, are also listed in the RGs that are
incorporated by reference along with the conditions under which they
may be applied. If the NRC did not conditionally accept ASME code
cases, it would disapprove these code cases entirely. The effect would
be that licensees would need to submit a larger number of relief
requests, which would be an unnecessary additional burden for both the
licensee and the NRC. For these reasons, the treatment of ASME BPV and
OM Code Cases and any conditions proposed to be placed on them in this
proposed rule does not conflict with any policy on agency use of
consensus standards specified in OMB Circular A-119.
Finding of No Significant Environmental Impact: Environmental
Assessment
This proposed action stems from the Commission's practice of
incorporating by reference the RGs listing the most recent set of NRC-
approved ASME code cases. The purpose of this proposed action is to
allow licensees to use the code cases listed in the RGs as alternatives
to requirements in the ASME BPV Code for the construction and ISI of
nuclear power plant components. This proposed action is intended to
advance the NRC's strategic goal of ensuring adequate protection of
public health and safety and the environment. It also demonstrates the
agency's commitment to participate in the national consensus standards
process under the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of
1995, Public Law 104-113.
The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires Federal
government agencies to study the impacts of their ``major Federal
actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment''
and prepare detailed statements on the environmental impacts of the
action and alternatives to the action (United States Code, Vol. 42,
Section 4332(C) [42 U.S.C. Sec. 4332(C)]; NEPA Sec. 102(C)).
The Commission has determined under NEPA, as amended, and the
Commission's regulations in Subpart A of 10 CFR Part 51 that this
proposed rule would not be a major Federal action significantly
affecting the quality of the human environment. Therefore, an
environmental impact statement is not required.
As alternatives to the ASME Code, NRC-approved code cases provide
an equivalent level of safety. Therefore, the probability or
consequences of accidents is not changed. There are also no
significant, non-radiological impacts associated with this action
because no changes would be made affecting non-radiological plant
effluents and because no changes would be made in activities that would
adversely affect the environment. The determination of this
environmental assessment is that there will be no significant offsite
impact to the public from this proposed action.
Paperwork Reduction Act Statement
This proposed rule increases the burden on licensees applying ASME
Code Case N-730 to maintain repair records of the current control drive
bottom head penetrations in BWRs for the life of the reactor vessel (10
CFR 50.55a). The public burden for this information collection is
estimated to average 5 hours per request. Because the burden for this
information collection is insignificant, Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) clearance is not required. Existing requirements were
approved by the OMB approval number 3150-0011.
Public Protection Notification
The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to
respond to, a request for information or an information collection
unless the requesting document displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Regulatory Analysis
The ASME Code Cases listed in the RGs to be incorporated by
reference provide voluntary alternatives to the provisions in the ASME
BPV Code for design, construction, and ISI of specific structures,
systems, and components used in nuclear power plants. Implementation of
these code cases is not required. Licensees use NRC-approved ASME Code
Cases to reduce unnecessary regulatory burden or gain additional
operational flexibility. It would be difficult for the NRC to provide
these advantages independently of the ASME Code Case publication
process without expending considerable additional resources. The NRC
has prepared a regulatory analysis addressing the qualitative benefits
of the alternatives considered in this proposed rulemaking and
comparing the costs associated with each alternative. The regulatory
analysis is available for inspection on public computers in the NRC
PDR, located at One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville,
Maryland 20852, Room O-1 F21. Copies of the regulatory analysis are
also available to the public as indicated under the Availability of
Documents heading in this preamble.
[[Page 26309]]
Regulatory Flexibility Certification
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 605(b)), the
Commission certifies that this proposed rule would not impose a
significant economical impact on a substantial number of small
entities. This proposed rule would affect only the licensing and
operation of nuclear power plants. The companies that own these plants
are not ``small entities'' as defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act
or the size standards established by the NRC (10 CFR 2.810).
Backfitting Analysis
The provisions in this proposed rulemaking would allow licensees to
voluntarily apply NRC-approved code cases, sometimes with conditions.
The voluntary implementation of an approved code case would not
constitute a backfit. Thus, the Commission finds that this proposed
rule does not involve any provisions that constitute a backfit as
defined in 10 CFR 50.109(a)(1) and that a backfit rule is not required.
Accordingly, a backfit analysis has not been prepared for this
rulemaking.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 50
Antitrust, Classified information, Criminal penalties, Fire
protection, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nuclear power plants and reactors, Radiation protection, Reactor siting
criteria, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, and under the authority
of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended; the Energy Reorganization
Act of 1974, as amended; and 5 U.S.C. 553, the NRC proposes to adopt
the following amendments to 10 CFR Part 50.
PART 50--DOMESTIC LICENSING OF PRODUCTION AND UTILIZATION
FACILITIES
1. The authority citation for Part 50 is revised to read as
follows:
Authority: Secs. 102, 103, 104, 105, 161, 182, 183, 186, 189,
68 Stat. 936, 937, 938, 948, 953, 954, 955, 956, as amended, sec.
234, 83 Stat. 444, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2132, 2133, 2134, 2135,
2201, 2232, 2233, 2236, 2239, 2282); secs. 201, as amended, 202,
206, 88 Stat. 1242, as amended, 1244, 1246 (42 U.S.C. 5841, 5842,
5846); sec. 1704, 112 Stat. 2750 (44 U.S.C. 3504 note); Energy
Policy Act of 2005, Pub. L. 109-58, 119 Stat. 194 (2005).
Section 50.7 also issued under Pub. L. 95-601, sec. 10, 92 Stat.
2951 as amended by Pub. L. 102-486, sec. 2902, 106 Stat. 3123 (42
U.S.C. 5841), Section 50.10 also issued under secs. 101, 185, 68
Stat. 955, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2131, 2235); sec. 102, Pub. L. 91-
190, 83 Stat. 853 (42 U.S.C. 4332). Sections 50.13, 50.54(d), and
50.103 also issued under sec. 108, 68 Stat. 939, as amended (42
U.S.C. 2138). Sections 50.23, 50.35, 50.55, and 50.56 also issued
under sec. 185, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C. 2235). Sections 50.33a,
50.55a and Appendix Q also issued under sec. 102, Pub. L. 91-190, 83
Stat. 853 (42 U.S.C. 4332). Sections 50.34 and 50.54 also issued
under sec. 204, 88 Stat. 1245 (42 U.S.C. 5844). Sections 50.58,
50.91, and 50.92 also issued under Pub. L. 97-415, 96 Stat. 2073 (42
U.S.C. 2239). Section 50.78 also issued under sec. 122, 68 Stat. 939
(42 U.S.C. 2152). Sections 50.80-50.81 also issued under sec. 184,
68 Stat. 954, as amended (42 U.S.C. 2234). Appendix F also issued
under sec. 187, 68 Stat. 955 (42 U.S.C. 2237).
2. Section 50.55a is amended by revising the introductory text of
paragraphs (b), (b)(4), and (b)(5), and paragraphs (f)(2),
(f)(3)(iii)(A), (f)(3)(iv)(A), (f)(4)(ii), (g)(2), (g)(3)(i),
(g)(3)(ii), (g)(4)(i) and (g)(4)(ii) to read as follows:
Sec. 50.55a Codes and Standards.
* * * * *
(b) The ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code and the ASME Code for
Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants, which are referenced
in paragraphs (b)(1), (b)(2), and (b)(3) of this section, were approved
for incorporation by reference by the Director of the Office of the
Federal Register pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. NRC
Regulatory Guide 1.84, Revision 35, ``Design, Fabrication, and
Materials Code Case Acceptability, ASME Section III'' [temporarily
designated DG-1191]; NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision 16,
``Inservice Inspection Code Case Acceptability, ASME Section XI,
Division 1'' [temporarily designated DG-1192]; and Regulatory Guide
1.192, ``Operation and Maintenance Code Case Acceptability, ASME OM
Code,'' (June 2003), have been approved for incorporation by reference
by the Director of the Office of the Federal Register pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552(a) and 1 CFR part 51. These Regulatory Guides list ASME Code
cases that the NRC has approved in accordance with the requirements in
paragraphs (b)(4), (b)(5), and (b)(6) of this section. Copies of the
ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code and the ASME Code for Operation
and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants may be purchased from the
American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Three Park Avenue, New York,
NY 10016. Single copies of NRC Regulatory Guides 1.84, Revision 35;
1.147, Revision 16; and 1.192 may be obtained free of charge by writing
the Reproduction and Distribution Services Section, U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; or by fax to 301-415-
2289; or by e-mail to Distribution.Resource@nrc.gov. Copies of the ASME
Codes and NRC Regulatory Guides incorporated by reference in this
section may be inspected at the NRC Technical Library, Two White Flint
North, 11545 Rockville Pike, Rockville, MD 20852-2738, or at the
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). For information on
the availability of this material at NARA, call 202-741-6030, or go to:
https://www.archives.gov/federal register/code of federal regulations/
ibr locations.html.
* * * * *
(4) Design, Fabrication, and Materials Code Cases. Applicants and
licensees may apply the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code cases
listed in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.84, Revision 35 without prior NRC
approval subject to the following:
* * * * *
(5) In-service Inspection Code Cases. Licensees may apply the ASME
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code cases listed in Regulatory Guide 1.147,
Revision 16, without prior NRC approval subject to the following:
* * * * *
(f) * * *
(2) For a boiling or pressurized water-cooled nuclear power
facility whose construction permit was issued on or after January 1,
1971, but before July 1, 1974, pumps and valves which are classified as
ASME Code Class 1 and Class 2 must be designed and be provided with
access to enable the performance of inservice tests for operational
readiness set forth in editions and addenda of Section XI of the ASME
Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code incorporated by reference in paragraph
(b) of this section (or the optional ASME Code cases listed in NRC
Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision 16; or Regulatory Guide 1.192 that are
incorporated by reference in paragraph (b) of this section) in effect 6
months before the date of issuance of the construction permit. The
pumps and valves may meet the inservice test requirements set forth in
subsequent editions of this Code and addenda which are incorporated by
reference in paragraph (b) of this section (or the optional ASME Code
Cases listed in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision 16; or Regulatory
Guide 1.192 that are incorporated by reference in paragraph (b) of this
section), subject to the applicable limitations and modifications
listed therein.
(3) * * *
[[Page 26310]]
(iii) (A) Pumps and valves, in facilities whose construction permit
was issued before November 22, 1999, which are classified as ASME Code
Class 1 must be designed and be provided with access to enable the
performance of inservice testing of the pumps and valves for assessing
operational readiness set forth in the editions and addenda of Section
XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code incorporated by
reference in paragraph (b) of this section (or the optional ASME Code
cases listed in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision 16; or Regulatory
Guide 1.192 that are incorporated by reference in paragraph (b) of this
section) applied to the construction of the particular pump or valve or
the Summer 1973 Addenda, whichever is later.
* * * * *
(iv)(A) Pumps and valves, in facilities whose construction permit
was issued before November 22, 1999, which are classified as ASME Code
Class 2 and Class 3 must be designed and be provided with access to
enable the performance of inservice testing of the pumps and valves for
assessing operational readiness set forth in the editions and addenda
of Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code incorporated
by reference in paragraph (b) of this section (or the optional ASME
Code Cases listed in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision 16, that are
incorporated by reference in paragraph (b) of this section) applied to
the construction of the particular pump or valve or the Summer 1973
Addenda, whichever is later.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) Inservice tests to verify operational readiness of pumps and
valves, whose function is required for safety, conducted during
successive 120-month intervals must comply with the requirements of the
latest edition and addenda of the Code incorporated by reference in
paragraph (b) of this section 12 months before the start of the 120-
month interval (or the optional ASME Code cases listed in NRC
Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision 16; or Regulatory Guide 1.192 that are
incorporated by reference in paragraph (b) of this section), subject to
the conditions listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
* * * * *
(g) * * *
(2) For a boiling or pressurized water-cooled nuclear power
facility whose construction permit was issued on or after January 1,
1971, but before July 1, 1974, components (including supports) which
are classified as ASME Code Class 1 and Class 2 must be designed and be
provided with access to enable the performance of inservice examination
of such components (including supports) and must meet the preservice
examination requirements set forth in editions and addenda of Section
XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code incorporated by
reference in paragraph (b) of this section (or the optional ASME Code
cases listed in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision 16, that are
incorporated by reference in paragraph (b) of this section) in effect 6
months before the date of issuance of the construction permit. The
components (including supports) may meet the requirements set forth in
subsequent editions and addenda of this Code which are incorporated by
reference in paragraph (b) of this section (or the optional ASME Code
cases listed in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision 16, that are
incorporated by reference in paragraph (b) of this section), subject to
the applicable limitations and modifications.
(3) * * *
(i) Components (including supports) which are classified as ASME
Code Class 1 must be designed and be provided with access to enable the
performance of inservice examination of these components and must meet
the preservice examination requirements set forth in the editions and
addenda of Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code
incorporated by reference in paragraph (b) of this section (or the
optional ASME Code cases listed in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision
16, that are incorporated by reference in paragraph (b) of this
section) applied to the construction of the particular component.
(ii) Components which are classified as ASME Code Class 2 and Class
3 and supports for components which are classified as ASME Code Class
1, Class 2, and Class 3 must be designed and be provided with access to
enable the performance of inservice examination of these components and
must meet the preservice examination requirements set forth in the
editions and addenda of Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure
Vessel Code incorporated by reference in paragraph (b) of this section
(or the optional ASME Code Cases listed in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147,
Revision 16, that are incorporated by reference in paragraph (b) of
this section) applied to the construction of the particular component.
* * * * *
(4) * * *
(i) Inservice examination of components and system pressure tests
conducted during the initial 120-month inspection interval must comply
with the requirements in the latest edition and addenda of the Code
incorporated by reference in paragraph (b) of this section on the date
12 months before the date of issuance of the operating license (or the
optional ASME Code cases listed in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision
16, that are incorporated by reference in paragraph (b) of this
section, subject to the conditions listed in paragraph (b) of this
section.
(ii) Inservice examination of components and system pressure tests
conducted during successive 120-month inspection intervals must comply
with the requirements of the latest edition and addenda of the Code
incorporated by reference in paragraph (b) of this section 12 months
before the start of the 120-month inspection interval (or the optional
ASME Code cases listed in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.147, Revision 16, that
are incorporated by reference in paragraph (b) of this section),
subject to the conditions listed in paragraph (b) of this section.
* * * * *
Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 12th day of May 2009.
For the Nuclear Regulatory Commission
R.W. Borchardt,
Executive Director for Operations.
[FR Doc. E9-12751 Filed 6-1-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7590-01-P