Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Experimental Study of Nutrition Symbols on Food Packages, 26244-26246 [E9-12669]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
26244
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 103 / Monday, June 1, 2009 / Notices
Estimated
number of
responses per
respondent
Estimated
number of
respondents
Type of respondents
Average
burden hours
per response
Estimated
total annual
burden hours
requested
Public Sector Groups .......................................................................................
Health Professionals ........................................................................................
332
711
0.33
0.33
0.2
0.2
22
47
Totals ........................................................................................................
2,450
........................
........................
162
Request for Comments: Written
comments and/or suggestions from the
public and affected agencies are invited
on one or more of the following points:
(1) Whether the proposed collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the function of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) The accuracy of the agency’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) Ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
Ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Direct Comments to OMB: Written
comments and/or suggestions regarding
the item(s) contained in this notice,
especially regarding the estimated
public burden and associated response
time, should be directed to the: Office
of Management and Budget, Office of
Regulatory Affairs,
OIRA_submission@omb.eop.gov or by
fax to 202–395–6974, Attention: Desk
Officer for NIH. To request more
information on the proposed project or
to obtain a copy of the data collection
plans and instruments, contact: Dr. Ann
M. Taubenheim, Principal Investigator,
National Heart, Lung, and Blood
Institute, Office of Communications and
Legislative Activities, NIH, 31 Center
Drive, Building 31, Room 4A10,
Bethesda, MD 21045, or call non-tollfree number 301–496–4236 or e-mail
your request, including your address, to
taubenha@nhlbi.nih.gov.
Comments Due Date: Comments
regarding this information collection are
best assured of having their full effect if
received within 30 days of the date of
this publication.
Dated: May 22, 2009.
Ann M. Taubenheim,
Principal Investigator, NHLBI, National
Institutes of Health.
[FR Doc. E9–12604 Filed 5–29–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140–10–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:29 May 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0220]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Experimental
Study of Nutrition Symbols on Food
Packages
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the
proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (the
PRA), Federal agencies are required to
publish notice in the Federal Register
concerning each proposed collection of
information, and to allow 60 days for
public comment in response to the
notice. This notice solicits comments on
the Experimental Study of Nutrition
Symbols on Food Packages.
DATES: Submit written or electronic
comments on the collection of
information by July 31, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic
comments on the collection of
information to https://
www.regulations.gov. Submit written
comments on the collection of
information to the Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305), Food and Drug
Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm.
1061, Rockville, MD 20852. All
comments should be identified with the
docket number found in brackets in the
heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information
Management (HFA–710), Food and Drug
Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301–796–3794.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501–3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of
information they conduct or sponsor.
‘‘Collection of information’’ is defined
in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests
or requirements that members of the
public submit reports, keep records, or
provide information to a third party.
Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44
U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A)) requires Federal
agencies to provide a 60-day notice in
the Federal Register concerning each
proposed collection of information,
before submitting the collection to OMB
for approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing notice
of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following
collection of information, FDA invites
comments on these topics: (1) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of FDA’s functions, including whether
the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA’s
estimate of the burden of the proposed
collection of information, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance
the quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (4)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on
respondents, including through the use
of automated collection techniques,
when appropriate, and other forms of
information technology.
Experimental Study of Nutrition
Symbols on Food Packages
FDA has been following the
emergence of front-of-package nutrition
symbols in the marketplace. These
symbols are associated with programs
from sources including food
manufacturers, retailers, and third party
organizations (e.g., trade and health
organizations). The symbols are
intended to assist consumer choice by
providing simplified and easilyaccessible information on the
nutritional attributes of a food product.
Relevant and nonproprietary
information about the effects of
nutrition symbols on consumers,
however, is limited (see, for example,
Feunekes et al., 2008; ‘‘FDA Comments
on Symbols Public Hearing and Current
Plans for Addressing Issues,’’ Docket
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
26245
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 103 / Monday, June 1, 2009 / Notices
No. FDA–2007–N–0198).1 2 Therefore,
FDA is proposing to conduct an
experimental study to assess
quantitative consumer reactions to
front-of-package nutrition symbols.
FDA conducts research and
educational and public information
programs relating to food safety under
its broad statutory authority, set forth in
section 903(b)(2) of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act (the act) (21
U.S.C. 393 (b)(2)), to protect the public
health by ensuring that foods are ‘‘safe,
wholesome, sanitary, and properly
labeled,’’ and in section 903(d)(2)(C) (21
U.S.C. 393 (d)(2)(C)), to conduct
research relating to foods, drugs,
cosmetics and devices in carrying out
the act.
The purpose of the study is to help
enhance FDA’s understanding of
consumer understanding and use of a
selected sample of nutrition symbols in
the domestic marketplace. The study is
part of the agency’s continuing effort to
enable consumers to make informed
dietary choices and construct healthful
diets.
The proposed experimental study will
use a Web-based survey to collect
information from a sample of adult
members in an online consumer panel
established by a contractor. The study
plans to randomly assign each of 2,400
participants to view a label from a set
of food labels that vary in the presence
and type of symbol, the type of food
product, and the quality of nutritional
attributes of the product. The study
plans to make the mandatory Nutrition
Facts label available to all participants.
The study will focus on the following
types of consumer reaction: (1)
Judgments about a food product in
terms of its nutritional attributes, overall
healthfulness, health benefits, and other
characteristics such as taste; (2)
judgments about a label in terms of its
credibility in conveying the product’s
nutritional attributes and helpfulness in
product choices; (3) identification of the
more nutritious product in a pair of
products; and (4) impact of the symbol
on the use of the Nutrition Facts label.
To help understand consumer reactions,
the study will also collect information
on participants’ background, including
but not limited to consumption and
perceptions of food products, nutrition
attitudes and practice, food label use,
health literacy, and health status.
In addition, the study will conduct a
separate face-to-face eye-tracking
examination using a separate sample of
30 adult consumers to explore their
label viewing patterns when they are
asked to judge product attributes and to
compare products. Participants will be
selected from a commercial database of
consumers.
The study results will be used to help
the agency in its continuing evaluation
of issues related to the use of nutrition
symbols in food labeling. The results of
the experimental study will not be used
to develop population estimates.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1.—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
No. of
Respondents
Portion of Study
Cognitive interview screener
Annual Frequency
per Response
Total Annual
Responses
Hours per
Response
144
1
144
0.083
12
18
1
18
1
18
1,600
1
1,600
0.033
53
200
1
200
0.25
50
19,200
1
19,200
0.033
634
2,400
1
2,400
0.25
600
240
1
240
0.083
20
30
1
30
1
30
Cognitive interview
Pretest invitation
Pretest
Survey invitation
Survey
Eye-tracking screener
Eye-tracking
Total
1 There
Total Hours
1,417
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information..
To help design and refine the
questionnaire to be used for the
experimental study, we plan to conduct
cognitive interviews by screening 144
adult consumers in order to obtain 18
participants in the interviews. Each
screening is expected to take 5 minutes
(0.083 hours) and each cognitive
interview is expected to take 1 hour.
The total for cognitive interview
activities is 30 hours (12 hours + 18
hours). Subsequently, we plan to
conduct pretests of the survey
questionnaire before it is administered
in the study. We expect that 1,600
invitations, each taking 2 minutes (0.033
hours), will need to be sent to adult
members of an online consumer panel
to have 200 of them complete a 15–
minute (0.025 hours) pretest. The total
for the pretest activities is 103 hours (53
hours + 50 hours). For the survey, we
estimate that 19,200 invitations, each
taking 2 minutes (0.033 hours), will
need to be sent to adult members of an
online consumer panel to have 2,400 of
them complete a 15–minute (0.025
hours) questionnaire. The total for the
survey activities is 1,234 hours (634
hours + 600 hours). To conduct the eye-
1 Feunekes, G. I. J., I. A. Gortemaker, A. A.
Willems, and R. Lion, Front-of-pack Nutrition
Labeling: Testing Effectiveness of Different
Nutrition Labeling Formats Front-of-pack in Four
European Countries, Appetite 50(1): 57-70, 2008.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:29 May 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
tracking study, we expect to screen 240
adult consumers, each taking 5 minutes
(0.083 hours), to have 30 of them
participate in an 1-hour interview. The
total for the eye-tracking activities is 50
hours (20 hours + 30 hours). Thus, the
total estimated burden is 1,417 hours.
FDA’s burden estimate is based on prior
experience with research that is similar
to this proposed study.
2 https://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/cfsup196.html.
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
26246
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 103 / Monday, June 1, 2009 / Notices
Dated: May 26, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E9–12669 Filed 5–29–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
in the United States and Territories
(OMB Control No. 0920–0743, Exp. 7/
31/2009)–Revision–National Center for
Chronic Disease Prevention and Health
Promotion (NCCDPHP), Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day–09–0743]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of
information collection requests under
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance
Officer at (404) 639–5960 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written
comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC or by fax to (202) 395–6974. Written
comments should be received within 30
days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Assessment and Monitoring of
Breastfeeding-Related Maternity Care
Practices in Intra-partum Care Facilities
Substantial evidence demonstrates the
health benefits of breastfeeding.
Breastfeeding mothers have lower risks
of breast and ovarian cancers and type
2 diabetes, and breastfeeding better
protects infants against infections,
chronic diseases like diabetes and
obesity, and even childhood leukemia
and sudden infant death syndrome
(SIDS). However, the groups that are at
higher risk for diabetes, obesity, and
poor health overall persistently have the
lowest breastfeeding rates. Public health
priorities for the U.S. include increasing
the overall rate of breastfeeding, and
reducing variation in breastfeeding rates
across population subgroups.
The health care system is one of the
most important and effective settings to
improve breastfeeding. In 2007, CDC
conducted the first national survey of
Maternity Practices in Infant Nutrition
and Care (known as the mPINC Survey)
in health care facilities (hospitals and
free-standing childbirth centers). The
survey was designed to provide baseline
information and to be repeated again in
2009. It inquired about patient
education and support for breastfeeding
throughout the maternity stay as well as
staff training and maternity care
policies. Each responding organization
received a customized Benchmark
Report as well as other feedback to use
in self-assessment and quality
improvement activities.
CDC proposes to repeat the mPINC in
2009 using previously fielded questions
and methodology. In addition to all
facilities that participated in 2007, the
2009 survey will include those that
were invited but did not participate in
2007 and any that are new since then.
All birth centers and hospitals with ≥ 1
registered maternity beds will be
screened via a brief phone call to assess
their eligibility, identify additional
locations, and identify the appropriate
point of contact.
A major goal of the 2009 survey is to
be fully responsive to respondents’
needs for information and technical
assistance. CDC will again provide
customized benchmark reports to
respondents and document progress
since 2007 on their quality
improvement efforts. National and state
reports will use de-identified data to
describe incremental changes in
practices and care processes over time at
the facility, state, and national levels.
Participation in the survey is
voluntary, and responses may be
submitted by mail or through a webbased system. There are no costs to
respondents other than their time. The
total estimated annualized burden hours
are 1,686.
ESTIMATED ANNUALIZED BURDEN HOURS
Type of
respondents
Form name
Hospitals .................................
Telephone Screening Interview for Hospitals ........................
2009 mPINC Survey for Hospitals .........................................
Telephone Screening Interview for Birth Centers ..................
2009 mPINC Survey for Birth Centers ...................................
Birth Centers ...........................
Number of
respondents
Dated: May 26, 2009.
Maryam I. Daneshvar,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9–12631 Filed 5–29–09; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
[60Day-0920–09BS]
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for
opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
Centers for Disease Control and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:29 May 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3,897
2,568
192
122
Number of
responses per
respondent
1
1
1
1
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
5/60
30/60
5/60
30/60
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic
summaries of proposed projects. To
request more information on the
proposed projects or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and
instruments, call 404–639–5960 and
send comments to Maryam I. Daneshvar,
CDC Acting Reports Clearance Officer,
1600 Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta,
GA 30333 or send an e-mail to
omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
E:\FR\FM\01JNN1.SGM
01JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 103 (Monday, June 1, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26244-26246]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12669]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0220]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposed Collection;
Comment Request; Experimental Study of Nutrition Symbols on Food
Packages
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing an
opportunity for public comment on the proposed collection of certain
information by the agency. Under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(the PRA), Federal agencies are required to publish notice in the
Federal Register concerning each proposed collection of information,
and to allow 60 days for public comment in response to the notice. This
notice solicits comments on the Experimental Study of Nutrition Symbols
on Food Packages.
DATES: Submit written or electronic comments on the collection of
information by July 31, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Submit electronic comments on the collection of information
to https://www.regulations.gov. Submit written comments on the
collection of information to the Division of Dockets Management (HFA-
305), Food and Drug Administration, 5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061,
Rockville, MD 20852. All comments should be identified with the docket
number found in brackets in the heading of this document.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jonna Capezzuto, Office of Information
Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane,
Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3794.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520), Federal
agencies must obtain approval from the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) for each collection of information they conduct or sponsor.
``Collection of information'' is defined in 44 U.S.C. 3502(3) and 5 CFR
1320.3(c) and includes agency requests or requirements that members of
the public submit reports, keep records, or provide information to a
third party. Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the PRA (44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(2)(A))
requires Federal agencies to provide a 60-day notice in the Federal
Register concerning each proposed collection of information, before
submitting the collection to OMB for approval. To comply with this
requirement, FDA is publishing notice of the proposed collection of
information set forth in this document.
With respect to the following collection of information, FDA
invites comments on these topics: (1) Whether the proposed collection
of information is necessary for the proper performance of FDA's
functions, including whether the information will have practical
utility; (2) the accuracy of FDA's estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (3) ways to enhance the quality,
utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (4) ways
to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents,
including through the use of automated collection techniques, when
appropriate, and other forms of information technology.
Experimental Study of Nutrition Symbols on Food Packages
FDA has been following the emergence of front-of-package nutrition
symbols in the marketplace. These symbols are associated with programs
from sources including food manufacturers, retailers, and third party
organizations (e.g., trade and health organizations). The symbols are
intended to assist consumer choice by providing simplified and easily-
accessible information on the nutritional attributes of a food product.
Relevant and nonproprietary information about the effects of nutrition
symbols on consumers, however, is limited (see, for example, Feunekes
et al., 2008; ``FDA Comments on Symbols Public Hearing and Current
Plans for Addressing Issues,'' Docket
[[Page 26245]]
No. FDA-2007-N-0198).\1\ \2\ Therefore, FDA is proposing to conduct an
experimental study to assess quantitative consumer reactions to front-
of-package nutrition symbols.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Feunekes, G. I. J., I. A. Gortemaker, A. A. Willems, and R.
Lion, Front-of-pack Nutrition Labeling: Testing Effectiveness of
Different Nutrition Labeling Formats Front-of-pack in Four European
Countries, Appetite 50(1): 57-70, 2008.
\2\ https://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/cfsup196.html.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
FDA conducts research and educational and public information
programs relating to food safety under its broad statutory authority,
set forth in section 903(b)(2) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic
Act (the act) (21 U.S.C. 393 (b)(2)), to protect the public health by
ensuring that foods are ``safe, wholesome, sanitary, and properly
labeled,'' and in section 903(d)(2)(C) (21 U.S.C. 393 (d)(2)(C)), to
conduct research relating to foods, drugs, cosmetics and devices in
carrying out the act.
The purpose of the study is to help enhance FDA's understanding of
consumer understanding and use of a selected sample of nutrition
symbols in the domestic marketplace. The study is part of the agency's
continuing effort to enable consumers to make informed dietary choices
and construct healthful diets.
The proposed experimental study will use a Web-based survey to
collect information from a sample of adult members in an online
consumer panel established by a contractor. The study plans to randomly
assign each of 2,400 participants to view a label from a set of food
labels that vary in the presence and type of symbol, the type of food
product, and the quality of nutritional attributes of the product. The
study plans to make the mandatory Nutrition Facts label available to
all participants. The study will focus on the following types of
consumer reaction: (1) Judgments about a food product in terms of its
nutritional attributes, overall healthfulness, health benefits, and
other characteristics such as taste; (2) judgments about a label in
terms of its credibility in conveying the product's nutritional
attributes and helpfulness in product choices; (3) identification of
the more nutritious product in a pair of products; and (4) impact of
the symbol on the use of the Nutrition Facts label. To help understand
consumer reactions, the study will also collect information on
participants' background, including but not limited to consumption and
perceptions of food products, nutrition attitudes and practice, food
label use, health literacy, and health status.
In addition, the study will conduct a separate face-to-face eye-
tracking examination using a separate sample of 30 adult consumers to
explore their label viewing patterns when they are asked to judge
product attributes and to compare products. Participants will be
selected from a commercial database of consumers.
The study results will be used to help the agency in its continuing
evaluation of issues related to the use of nutrition symbols in food
labeling. The results of the experimental study will not be used to
develop population estimates.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1.--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. of Annual Frequency Total Annual Hours per
Portion of Study Respondents per Response Responses Response Total Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cognitive interview screener 144 1 144 0.083 12
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cognitive interview 18 1 18 1 18
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretest invitation 1,600 1 1,600 0.033 53
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pretest 200 1 200 0.25 50
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Survey invitation 19,200 1 19,200 0.033 634
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Survey 2,400 1 2,400 0.25 600
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eye-tracking screener 240 1 240 0.083 20
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eye-tracking 30 1 30 1 30
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 1,417
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information..
To help design and refine the questionnaire to be used for the
experimental study, we plan to conduct cognitive interviews by
screening 144 adult consumers in order to obtain 18 participants in the
interviews. Each screening is expected to take 5 minutes (0.083 hours)
and each cognitive interview is expected to take 1 hour. The total for
cognitive interview activities is 30 hours (12 hours + 18 hours).
Subsequently, we plan to conduct pretests of the survey questionnaire
before it is administered in the study. We expect that 1,600
invitations, each taking 2 minutes (0.033 hours), will need to be sent
to adult members of an online consumer panel to have 200 of them
complete a 15-minute (0.025 hours) pretest. The total for the pretest
activities is 103 hours (53 hours + 50 hours). For the survey, we
estimate that 19,200 invitations, each taking 2 minutes (0.033 hours),
will need to be sent to adult members of an online consumer panel to
have 2,400 of them complete a 15-minute (0.025 hours) questionnaire.
The total for the survey activities is 1,234 hours (634 hours + 600
hours). To conduct the eye-tracking study, we expect to screen 240
adult consumers, each taking 5 minutes (0.083 hours), to have 30 of
them participate in an 1-hour interview. The total for the eye-tracking
activities is 50 hours (20 hours + 30 hours). Thus, the total estimated
burden is 1,417 hours. FDA's burden estimate is based on prior
experience with research that is similar to this proposed study.
[[Page 26246]]
Dated: May 26, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E9-12669 Filed 5-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
