Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Florida; Removal of Gasoline Vapor Recovery From the Southeast Florida Area, 26103-26107 [E9-12575]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
26103
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 103 / Monday, June 1, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: May 15, 2009.
Beverly H. Banister,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Intergovernmental
relations, Incorporation by reference,
Ozone, Nitrogen dioxides, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Volatile organic compounds.
■
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart PP—South Carolina
2. Section 52.2120(e) is amended by
adding a new entry for the ‘‘Cherokee
County 8-Hour Ozone Section 110(a)(1)
Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-hour
ozone standard’’ to read as follows:
■
§ 52.2210
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED SOUTH CAROLINA NON-REGULATORY PROVISIONS
Applicable
geographic or
nonattainment
area
Name of nonregulatory SIP provision
*
*
Cherokee County 110(a)(1) Maintenance Plan for the 1997 8-Hour
Ozone Standard.
Effective date
*
Cherokee County
[FR Doc. E9–12546 Filed 5–29–09; 8:45 am]
DATES:
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
*
12/13/2007
EPA approval date
*
*
July 31, 2009. [Insert citation of publication].
This rule will be effective July 1,
2009.
EPA has established a
docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA–R04–OAR–
2007–0836. All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the https://
www.regulations.gov Web site. Although
listed in the index, some information is
not publicly available, i.e., Confidential
Business Information or other
information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Certain other
material, such as copyrighted material,
is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy
form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either
electronically in https://
www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at
the Regulatory Development Section,
Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and
Toxics Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. EPA
requests that, if at all possible, you
contact the person listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section to
schedule your inspection. The Regional
Office’s official hours of business are
Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding Federal holidays.
ADDRESSES:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R04–OAR–2007–0836–200739(f);
FRL–8911–6]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Florida;
Removal of Gasoline Vapor Recovery
From the Southeast Florida Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION:
Final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to
approve revisions to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by
the State of Florida on May 31, 2007, for
the purpose of removing Stage II vapor
control requirements for new and
upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities
in Dade, Broward, and Palm Beach
Counties (hereafter referred to as the
‘‘Southeast Florida Area’’), and to phase
out Stage II requirements for existing
facilities in those counties. In addition,
EPA is approving this SIP revision
which requires new and upgraded
gasoline dispensing facilities and new
bulk gasoline plants statewide to
employ Stage I vapor control systems,
and phases in Stage I vapor control
requirements statewide for existing
gasoline dispensing facilities. This final
rule addresses a comment made on
EPA’s proposed rulemaking previously
published for this action.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 May 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Twunjala Bradley, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning
Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency,
Region 4, 61 Forsyth Street, SW.,
Atlanta, Georgia 30303–8960. The
telephone number is (404) 562–9352.
Ms. Bradley can also be reached via
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4700
Explanation
Sfmt 4700
*
electronic mail at
bradley.twunjala@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. EPA Guidance and Clean Air Act (CAA)
Requirements
III. Today’s Action
IV. Comment and Response
V. Final Action
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Review
I. Background
On January 6, 1992, EPA designated
the Southeast Florida Area as a
‘‘moderate’’ ozone nonattainment area
for the 1-hour ozone standard (56 FR
56694). As a result of the designation,
the State of Florida was required to
implement Stage II vapor recovery.
Pursuant to the requirements of section
182(b)(3) of the CAA, Florida developed
Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.)
Rule 62–252.400, ‘‘Gasoline Dispensing
Facilities-Stage II Vapor Recovery.’’ The
rule established that new gasoline
dispensing facilities built after
November 15, 1992, were required to
employ Stage II systems upon start-up;
and existing facilities were required to
install Stage II systems by specific dates
ranging from June 30, 1993, to
November 15, 1994. This State rule was
submitted as part of Florida’s SIP and
approved by EPA effective April 25,
1994 (59 FR 13883).
On November 8, 1993, Florida
submitted to EPA an ozone
redesignation request and maintenance
plan for the Southeast Florida Area for
attainment status for the 1-hour ozone
standard. This request was due to the
State implementing all measures
required for moderate ozone
E:\FR\FM\01JNR1.SGM
01JNR1
26104
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 103 / Monday, June 1, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
nonattainment areas under the CAA and
exhibiting three years of clean data
(1990–1992) for the 1-hour ozone
standard. The maintenance plan,
demonstrated that nitrogen oxides
(NOX) and volatile organic compound
(VOC) emissions in the area would
remain below the 1990 ‘‘attainment
year’’ levels throughout the ten-year
period from 1995 to 2005. In making
these projections, Florida factored in the
emissions benefit (primarily VOCs) of
the area’s Stage II program, thereby
maintaining this program as part of its
1-hour ozone SIP. EPA approved the
maintenance plan and redesignation
request effective April 25, 1995 (60 FR
10325). Subsequently, the maintenance
plan was extended by Florida to 2015
and approved by EPA, effective April
13, 2004 (69 FR 7127).
On May 31, 2007, Florida submitted
a SIP revision requesting the removal of
Stage II vapor control requirements for
new and upgraded gasoline dispensing
facilities in the Southeast Florida Area,
and to phase out Stage II requirements
for existing facilities in those counties.
In addition to removing Stage II
requirements for the Southeast Florida
Area, Florida’s SIP revision requires
Stage I vapor recovery at new and
upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities
statewide; phase in Stage I vapor
recovery statewide for existing gasoline
dispensing facilities not previously
required to have Stage I; and tanker
trucks and trailers to ensure connection
of the vapor return line at facilities
equipped for Stage I vapor recovery
statewide. Currently, Florida’s Stage I
vapor recovery is required for gasoline
dispensing facilities in seven counties
designated as maintenance areas for 8hour ozone (including Duval, Orange,
Hillsborough, Pinellas, Palm Beach,
Broward, and Miami-Dade Counties).
On September 16, 2008, EPA
simultaneously published a proposed
rule (73 FR 53404) and a direct final
rule (73 FR 53378) approving the
aforementioned revisions to Florida’s
SIP. The proposed and direct final rules
stated that if EPA received adverse
comment by October 16, 2008, the direct
final rule would be withdrawn and
would not take effect. EPA subsequently
received an adverse comment regarding
the approval of the submittal on
September 16, 2008, and thus withdrew
the direct final rulemaking on October
27, 2008 (73 FR 63639).
Under CAA section 202(a)(6) areas
classified under section 181 as moderate
ozone nonattainment areas were not
required to implement Stage II vapor
recovery programs after promulgation of
the ORVR standards. The CAA no
longer required moderate areas to
impose Stage II controls under section
182(b)(3) and such areas could
implement SIP revisions to remove the
requirements. However, at the time of
ORVR promulgation, the Southeast
Florida Area Stage II program was
already in place and had been included
in the State’s November 8, 1993,
redesignation request and 1-hour ozone
maintenance plan for the area; therefore
Florida elected not to remove the
program from the SIP at that time.
As mentioned above, the Southeast
Florida Area is currently designated as
attainment for the 1997 8-hour (0.08
parts per million (ppm)) ozone standard
and has had an approved attainment
and maintenance plan for the 1-hour
ozone standard since April 25, 1995 (60
FR 10325). On March 12, 2008, EPA
strengthened its National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS) for the 8hour primary ground-level ozone
standard from 0.08 ppm (previously set
in 1997) to 0.075 ppm. The Southeast
Florida Area’s 8-hour ozone standard
design values for the years 2005–2007
were 0.074 ppm for Dade County, 0.067
ppm for Broward County and 0.066 ppm
for Palm Beach County. These levels
were below both the 1997 8-hour ozone
standard and the 2008 8-hour ozone
standard. Preliminary data through 2008
indicates that the Southeast Florida
Area is in compliance of both the 1997
and 2008 8-hour ozone standards.
On January 5, 2005, EPA published
nonattainment and attainment
designations for the PM2.5 standard (70
FR 944). The Southeast Florida Area
was designated as attainment for the
PM2.5 standard and has remained in
attainment through 2008. The level of
the current PM2.5 annual standard is 15
micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3).
The annual PM2.5 design value for
Southeast Florida Area for the period of
2005–2007 was 8.6 μg/m3. On October
17, 2006, EPA promulgated a revised
NAAQS for PM2.5 retaining the annual
PM2.5 standard of 15 μg/m3 and revising
the 24-hour PM2.5 standard from 65
μg/m3 to 35 μg/m3. The effective date for
the new standard was December 18,
2006.1 Florida submitted a letter dated
II. EPA Guidance and CAA
Requirements
On April 6, 1994, EPA promulgated
the regulations requiring the phase-in of
on-board refueling vapor recovery
(ORVR) systems on new motor vehicles.
1 On February 24, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals
for the DC Circuit granted a petition for review of
EPA’s decision to retain the annual PM2.5 standard
of 15 μg/m3 and remanded the matter to EPA for
further proceedings but did not vacate the standard.
American Farm Bureau Federation v. EPA (D.C.
Cir., No. 06–1410).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 May 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00028
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
December 12, 2007, which
recommended that the entire State of
Florida be designated as attainment for
the PM2.5 standard. On December 22,
2008, in accordance with the CAA, EPA
designated the State of Florida
(including Southeast Florida Area) as
attainment of the 2006, 24-hour PM2.5
standard. The daily PM2.5 design value
for Southeast Florida Area for the period
of 2005–2007 was 24.3 μg/m3.
Preliminary data through 2008 indicates
that the Southeast Florida Area is in
compliance of both the 1997 and 2006
particulate matter standards.
EPA’s primary consideration for
determining the approvability of
Florida’s request to remove Stage II
vapor control requirements for new and
upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities
in the Southeast Florida Area, and for
the phase out of Stage II requirements
for existing facilities in those counties,
is contingent on whether this requested
action complies with section 110(l) of
the CAA. Section 110(l) of the CAA
states that:
Each revision to an implementation plan
submitted by a State under this Chapter shall
be adopted by such State after reasonable
notice and public hearing. The administrator
shall not approve a revision of a plan if the
revision would interfere with any applicable
requirement concerning attainment and
reasonable further progress (as defined in
Section 7501 of this title), or any other
applicable requirement of this chapter.
III. Today’s Action
EPA is taking final action to approve
the SIP revision submitted by Florida
for the purpose of removing Stage II
vapor control requirements for new and
upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities
in Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm
Beach Counties, and phasing out Stage
II requirements for existing facilities in
those counties. Additionally, EPA is
approving rule changes which would
require new and upgraded gasoline
dispensing facilities and new bulk
gasoline plants statewide to employ
Stage I vapor control systems, and
would phase in Stage I vapor control
requirements statewide for existing
gasoline dispensing facilities. EPA is
also responding to the adverse comment
received on the September 16, 2008,
rulemaking proposing to approve the
aforementioned revisions (see 73 FR
53378). These approval actions are
based on EPA’s analyses of whether
these requests comply with section
110(l) of the CAA. EPA’s analyses for
the State of Florida’s submittal are
described in detail in the proposed and
direct final rules published September
16, 2008 (73 FR 53404 and 73 FR 53378,
respectively).
E:\FR\FM\01JNR1.SGM
01JNR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 103 / Monday, June 1, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
IV. Comment and Response
The following is a summary of the
adverse comment received on the direct
final and proposed rules published,
September 16, 2008, and EPA’s response
to the comment.
Comment: The commenter alleges that
removal of the Stage II vapor recovery
requirement with sole reliance on ORVR
canisters to reduce vehicle refueling
emissions violates the EPA rules for
such emissions to be less than or equal
to 0.2 grams/gallon. The commenter
provided data from a study that the
commenter believes supports his claim.
Response: The commenter provided
three sets of test data that he alleges
shows that existing ORVR systems emit
in excess of 0.2 grams/gallon. The
results of the three sets of test data
presented claim that actual emissions
range from 0.481 to 1.002 grams/gallon.
The commenter does not explain why
he believes this is relevant to the
removal of Stage II requirements in the
Southeast Florida Area.
In this rulemaking, EPA is making no
finding on the validity of the test data
or the commenter’s interpretation of the
results presented. Rather, EPA assessed
whether excess emissions of the
magnitude alleged to occur by the
commenter could impact the
noninterference demonstration prepared
by Florida.
Removing the Stage II vapor recovery
requirement from the Southeast Florida
Area’s portion of the Florida SIP may
result in a small, temporary increase in
VOC emissions within the three
26105
Southeast Florida counties. In the May
31, 2007, SIP revision, Florida estimated
anthropogenic VOC emissions in the
Southeast Florida Area to be 512.6 tons/
day in 2005, falling to 494.6 tons/day in
2010 and 467.2 tons/day in 2015. By
comparison, 1990 VOC emission rates
were 867.8 tons/day. Florida has
projected a continued decrease in VOC
emissions from 2005 to 2010 and 2015
even with the removal of Stage II vapor
recovery systems. Specifically, Florida
projects reductions from 2005 VOC
emission rates of 18 tons/day in 2010
and 45.4 tons/day in 2015. The
following table shows the expected
emission changes in comparison with
the emissions that would occur if the
Stage II vapor recovery requirement
were to remain in force.
TABLE 1—TOTAL VOC 2 EMISSIONS FROM SOUTHEAST FLORIDA AREA WITH & WITHOUT VEHICLE REFUELING (STAGE II)
[Tons per day]
1990
2005
without
Stage II
2010
with
Stage II
with
Stage II
2015
without
Stage II
with
Stage II
without
Stage II
Miami-Dade ..............................................
Broward ....................................................
Palm Beach ..............................................
399.8
239.6
228.4
208.3
154.6
149.7
200.0
145.3
143.2
202.1
147.2
144.7
191.6
135.9
136.7
192.8
136.9
137.5
SE Florida Total ................................
867.8
512.6
488.4
494.0
464.2
467.2
Using 2007 gasoline and gasohol sales
data, if the commenter’s data are
accurate, the Southeast Florida Area
emission inventories projections for
2010 and 2015 would only increase by
1.98 to 5.64 tons/day. This is
significantly less than the expected
reductions projected to occur from 2005
to 2010 (18 tons/day) and 2015 (45 tons/
day). Hence, EPA concludes that even if
the commenter’s data are accurate,
emissions of VOCs in the Southeast
Florida Area would still continue to
decrease from 2005 emission levels.
Since the Southeast Florida Area was in
attainment in 2005 for the ozone
NAAQS, and continues to be in
attainment, EPA has determined that
removal of Stage II vapor recovery
systems in the Southeast Florida Area
would not result in interference with
attainment or maintenance of the ozone
NAAQS. Similarly, the Southeast
Florida area is in attainment for the
particulate matter NAAQS and, for the
reasons stated in the proposal and
2 The total VOC emissions in this area also
include a biogenic component that is assumed
constant over time. The biogenic VOC emissions for
the individual counties are estimated at 211.3 tpd
for Miami-Dade, 174.5 tpd for Broward, and 399.6
tpd for Palm Beach. These amounts can be added
to the man-made emissions to get the total VOC
emissions.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 May 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
previous direct final rule, EPA has
determined that removal of Stage II
vapor recovery systems in the Southeast
Florida Area would not result in
interference with attainment or
maintenance of the ozone and
particulate matter NAAQS, or any other
Clean Air Act applicable requirement.
Based on the factors mentioned above,
EPA believes that Florida’s
demonstration to remove the Stage II
requirement from the Florida SIP for the
Southeast Florida Area is consistent
with section 110(l) of the CAA.
revision includes changes to F.A.C.
Chapters 62–210.200 Definitions, 62–
210.310 Air General Permits, 62–
210.920 Air General Permit Forms, 62–
252.200 Definitions, 62–252.300
Gasoline Dispensing Facilities—Stage I
Vapor Recovery, 62–252.400 Gasoline
Dispensing Facilities—Stage II Vapor
Recovery, 62–252.500 Gasoline Tanker
Trucks, 62–296–418 Bulk Gasoline
Plants, and 62–296.509 Bulk Gasoline
Plants (Repealed). These revisions are
consistent with EPA guidance and the
CAA, as amended in 1990.
V. Final Action
EPA is taking final action to approve
the revisions to the Florida SIP for the
purpose of removing Stage II vapor
control requirements for new and
upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities
in Miami-Dade, Broward, and Palm
Beach Counties, and phasing out Stage
II requirements for existing facilities in
those counties. Additionally, EPA is
approving rule changes that would
require new and upgraded gasoline
dispensing facilities and new bulk
gasoline plants statewide to employ
Stage I vapor control systems, and
would phase in Stage I vapor control
requirements statewide for existing
gasoline dispensing facilities. This SIP
VI. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is
required to approve a SIP submission
that complies with the provisions of the
Act and applicable Federal regulations.
42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a).
Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions,
EPA’s role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the CAA. Accordingly, this action
merely approves State law as meeting
Federal requirements and does not
impose additional requirements beyond
those imposed by State law. For that
reason, this action:
• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ subject to review by the Office
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01JNR1.SGM
01JNR1
26106
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 103 / Monday, June 1, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
of Management and Budget under
Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
• Does not impose an information
collection burden under the provisions
of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
• Is certified as not having a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5
U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
• Does not contain any unfunded
mandate or significantly or uniquely
affect small governments, as described
in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);
• Does not have Federalism
implications as specified in Executive
Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10,
1999);
• Is not an economically significant
regulatory action based on health or
safety risks subject to Executive Order
13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);
• Is not a significant regulatory action
subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR
28355, May 22, 2001);
• Is not subject to requirements of
Section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because
application of those requirements would
be inconsistent with the CAA; and
• Does not provide EPA with the
discretionary authority to address, as
appropriate, disproportionate human
health or environmental effects, using
practicable and legally permissible
methods, under Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have
Tribal implications as specified by
Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249,
November 9, 2000), because the SIP is
not approved to apply in Indian country
located in the State, and EPA notes that
it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt
Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this action and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA,
petitions for judicial review of this
action must be filed in the United States
Court of Appeals for the appropriate
circuit by July 31, 2009. Filing a petition
for reconsideration by the Administrator
of this final rule does not affect the
finality of this action for the purposes of
judicial review nor does it extend the
time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not
postpone the effectiveness of such rule
or action. This action may not be
challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone,
particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: May 11, 2009.
Beverly H. Banister,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
■
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart K—Florida
2. Section 52.520(c) is amended by:
a. Under Chapter 62–210 revising
entries for ‘‘62–210.200’’ and ‘‘62–
210.300’’ and
■ b. Under Chapter 62–252 revising
entries for ‘‘62–252.200’’, ‘‘62–252.300’’,
‘‘62–252.400’’ and ‘‘62–252.500’’ and
■ c. Under Chapter 62–296, revising
entry for ‘‘62–296–509’’ and
■ d. Under Chapter 62–210, adding
entries for ‘‘62–210.310’’ and ‘‘62–
210.920’’ and
■ e. Under Chapter 62–296, adding the
entry for ‘‘62–296.418’’ to read as
follows:
■
■
§ 52.520
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED FLORIDA REGULATIONS
State citation
*
State effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
EPA approval date
*
Chapter 62–210
*
Explanation
*
*
Stationary Sources—General Requirements
*
62–210.200 ...............
*
*
Definitions ........................................
*
9/4/2006
*
*
June 1, 2009. [Insert citation of
publication].
*
*
62–210.300 ...............
*
*
Permits Required ............................
*
9/4/2006
*
62–210.310 ...............
Air General Permits .........................
9/4/2006
*
*
June 1, 2009. [Insert citation of
publication].
June 1, 2009. [Insert citation of
publication].
*
62–210.920 ...............
*
*
Air General Permit Forms ...............
*
9/4/2006
*
*
June 1, 2009. [Insert citation of
publication].
*
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 May 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\01JNR1.SGM
01JNR1
26107
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 103 / Monday, June 1, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
EPA-APPROVED FLORIDA REGULATIONS—Continued
State citation
State effective
date
Title/subject
*
*
*
*
Chapter 62–252
*
*
*
Definitions ........................................
*
9/4/2006
62–252.300 ...............
Gasoline
Dispensing
FacilitiesStage I Vapor Recovery.
Gasoline
Dispensing
FacilitiesStage II Vapor Recovery.
Gasoline Tanker Trucks ..................
9/4/2006
62–252.500 ...............
*
*
*
9/4/2006
9/4/2006
*
June 1, 2009.
publication].
June 1, 2009.
publication].
June 1, 2009.
publication].
June 1, 2009.
publication].
*
Chapter 62–296
Explanation
*
*
Gasoline Vapor Control
*
62–252.200 ...............
62–252.400 ...............
EPA approval date
*
[Insert citation of
*
[Insert citation of
[Insert citation of
[Insert citation of
*
*
*
Stationary Sources—Emission Standards
*
62–296.418 ...............
*
*
Bulk Gasoline Plants .......................
*
9/4/2006
*
*
June 1, 2009. [Insert citation of
publication].
*
62–296.509 ...............
*
*
Bulk Gasoline Plants .......................
*
........................
*
*
June 1, 2009. [Insert citation of
publication].
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E9–12575 Filed 5–29–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
GENERAL SERVICES
ADMINISTRATION
48 CFR Parts 546 and 552
[GSAR Amendment 2009–08; GSAR Case
2008–G514 (Change 36); Docket 2008–0007;
Sequence 7]
RIN 3090–AI69
General Services Administration
Acquisition Regulation; GSAR Case
2008–G514; Rewrite of Part 546,
Quality Assurance
AGENCIES: General Services
Administration (GSA), Office of the
Chief Acquisition Officer.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: The General Services
Administration (GSA) is amending the
General Services Administration
Acquisition Regulation (GSAR) by
revising sections of GSAR Part 546 and
552 that provides requirements for
quality assurance.
DATES: Effective Date: June 1, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
clarification of content, contact Jeritta
Parnell, Procurement Analyst, at (202)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:22 May 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
*
*
501–4082. For information pertaining to
status or publication schedules, contact
the Regulatory Secretariat (VPR), 1800 F
Street, NW, Room 4041, Washington,
DC, 20405, (202) 501–4755. Please cite
Amendment 2009–08, GSAR case 2008–
G514 (Change 36).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
A. Background
The GSA is amending the General
Services Administration Acquisition
Regulation (GSAR) to revise GSAR Parts
546 and 552 as follows:
The GSAR section 546.302–70, Source
Inspection by Quality Approved
Manufacturer for fixed-price supply
contracts, is revised to include
applicability to certain programs, i.e.,
stock, special order program, wildfire.
The subsection is revised to include
reference to FAR 52.246–2, Inspection
of Supplies—Fixed Price.
The GSAR section 546.302–71, Source
inspection, is retained with no revisions
to the clause except for the replacement
of Federal Supply Service (FSS) with
Federal Acquisition Service (FAS).
The GSAR section 546.302–72,
Destination inspection, is added to
prescribe the clause at 552.246–78,
Inspection at Destination.
The language in GSAR 546.312,
Construction contracts, that prescribes
the clause at 552.246–72, Final
Inspection and Tests, is retained.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
Repealed.
*
The language in GSAR 546.470–2,
Certification Testing, is deleted.
The language in GSAR 546.708,
Warranties of data, is revised to place
emphasis on the role of the contracting
officer.
The language in GSAR 546.710,
Contract clause, is revised to add the
clause at 552.246–77, Additional
Contract Warranty Provisions for
Supplies of a Noncomplex Nature. This
clause is used when the FAR clause at
52.246–17, Warranty of Supplies of a
Noncomplex Nature, is included in
solicitations and contracts. The
prescriptive language in paragraphs (b),
(c), and (d) is deleted. The clauses
prescribed in paragraphs (b), (c), and (d)
are being deleted.
The clause at GSAR 552.246–17,
Warranty of Supplies of a Noncomplex
Nature, is being deleted as it
unnecessarily repeats, paraphrases, or
otherwise restates material contained in
the FAR. A new clause GSAR 552.246–
77, Additional Contract Warranty
Provisions for Supplies of a
Noncomplex Nature, is added to
provide for GSA unique rights and
remedies.
The clause at GSAR 552.246.70,
Source Inspection by Quality Approved
Manufacturer, is revised to edit and
clarify existing clause language.
E:\FR\FM\01JNR1.SGM
01JNR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 103 (Monday, June 1, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 26103-26107]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12575]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R04-OAR-2007-0836-200739(f); FRL-8911-6]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Florida;
Removal of Gasoline Vapor Recovery From the Southeast Florida Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking final action to approve revisions to the State
Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Florida on May 31,
2007, for the purpose of removing Stage II vapor control requirements
for new and upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities in Dade, Broward,
and Palm Beach Counties (hereafter referred to as the ``Southeast
Florida Area''), and to phase out Stage II requirements for existing
facilities in those counties. In addition, EPA is approving this SIP
revision which requires new and upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities
and new bulk gasoline plants statewide to employ Stage I vapor control
systems, and phases in Stage I vapor control requirements statewide for
existing gasoline dispensing facilities. This final rule addresses a
comment made on EPA's proposed rulemaking previously published for this
action.
DATES: This rule will be effective July 1, 2009.
ADDRESSES: EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket
Identification No. EPA-R04-OAR-2007-0836. All documents in the
electronic docket are listed in the https://www.regulations.gov Web
site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly
available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such
as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be
publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket
materials are available either electronically in https://www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at the Regulatory Development
Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management
Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61 Forsyth
Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. EPA requests that, if at all
possible, you contact the person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT section to schedule your inspection. The Regional Office's
official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 to 4:30,
excluding Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Twunjala Bradley, Regulatory
Development Section, Air Planning Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics
Management Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, 61
Forsyth Street, SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960. The telephone number
is (404) 562-9352. Ms. Bradley can also be reached via electronic mail
at bradley.twunjala@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Background
II. EPA Guidance and Clean Air Act (CAA) Requirements
III. Today's Action
IV. Comment and Response
V. Final Action
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Review
I. Background
On January 6, 1992, EPA designated the Southeast Florida Area as a
``moderate'' ozone nonattainment area for the 1-hour ozone standard (56
FR 56694). As a result of the designation, the State of Florida was
required to implement Stage II vapor recovery. Pursuant to the
requirements of section 182(b)(3) of the CAA, Florida developed Florida
Administrative Code (F.A.C.) Rule 62-252.400, ``Gasoline Dispensing
Facilities-Stage II Vapor Recovery.'' The rule established that new
gasoline dispensing facilities built after November 15, 1992, were
required to employ Stage II systems upon start-up; and existing
facilities were required to install Stage II systems by specific dates
ranging from June 30, 1993, to November 15, 1994. This State rule was
submitted as part of Florida's SIP and approved by EPA effective April
25, 1994 (59 FR 13883).
On November 8, 1993, Florida submitted to EPA an ozone
redesignation request and maintenance plan for the Southeast Florida
Area for attainment status for the 1-hour ozone standard. This request
was due to the State implementing all measures required for moderate
ozone
[[Page 26104]]
nonattainment areas under the CAA and exhibiting three years of clean
data (1990-1992) for the 1-hour ozone standard. The maintenance plan,
demonstrated that nitrogen oxides (NOX) and volatile organic
compound (VOC) emissions in the area would remain below the 1990
``attainment year'' levels throughout the ten-year period from 1995 to
2005. In making these projections, Florida factored in the emissions
benefit (primarily VOCs) of the area's Stage II program, thereby
maintaining this program as part of its 1-hour ozone SIP. EPA approved
the maintenance plan and redesignation request effective April 25, 1995
(60 FR 10325). Subsequently, the maintenance plan was extended by
Florida to 2015 and approved by EPA, effective April 13, 2004 (69 FR
7127).
On May 31, 2007, Florida submitted a SIP revision requesting the
removal of Stage II vapor control requirements for new and upgraded
gasoline dispensing facilities in the Southeast Florida Area, and to
phase out Stage II requirements for existing facilities in those
counties. In addition to removing Stage II requirements for the
Southeast Florida Area, Florida's SIP revision requires Stage I vapor
recovery at new and upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities statewide;
phase in Stage I vapor recovery statewide for existing gasoline
dispensing facilities not previously required to have Stage I; and
tanker trucks and trailers to ensure connection of the vapor return
line at facilities equipped for Stage I vapor recovery statewide.
Currently, Florida's Stage I vapor recovery is required for gasoline
dispensing facilities in seven counties designated as maintenance areas
for 8-hour ozone (including Duval, Orange, Hillsborough, Pinellas, Palm
Beach, Broward, and Miami-Dade Counties).
On September 16, 2008, EPA simultaneously published a proposed rule
(73 FR 53404) and a direct final rule (73 FR 53378) approving the
aforementioned revisions to Florida's SIP. The proposed and direct
final rules stated that if EPA received adverse comment by October 16,
2008, the direct final rule would be withdrawn and would not take
effect. EPA subsequently received an adverse comment regarding the
approval of the submittal on September 16, 2008, and thus withdrew the
direct final rulemaking on October 27, 2008 (73 FR 63639).
II. EPA Guidance and CAA Requirements
On April 6, 1994, EPA promulgated the regulations requiring the
phase-in of on-board refueling vapor recovery (ORVR) systems on new
motor vehicles. Under CAA section 202(a)(6) areas classified under
section 181 as moderate ozone nonattainment areas were not required to
implement Stage II vapor recovery programs after promulgation of the
ORVR standards. The CAA no longer required moderate areas to impose
Stage II controls under section 182(b)(3) and such areas could
implement SIP revisions to remove the requirements. However, at the
time of ORVR promulgation, the Southeast Florida Area Stage II program
was already in place and had been included in the State's November 8,
1993, redesignation request and 1-hour ozone maintenance plan for the
area; therefore Florida elected not to remove the program from the SIP
at that time.
As mentioned above, the Southeast Florida Area is currently
designated as attainment for the 1997 8-hour (0.08 parts per million
(ppm)) ozone standard and has had an approved attainment and
maintenance plan for the 1-hour ozone standard since April 25, 1995 (60
FR 10325). On March 12, 2008, EPA strengthened its National Ambient Air
Quality Standard (NAAQS) for the 8-hour primary ground-level ozone
standard from 0.08 ppm (previously set in 1997) to 0.075 ppm. The
Southeast Florida Area's 8-hour ozone standard design values for the
years 2005-2007 were 0.074 ppm for Dade County, 0.067 ppm for Broward
County and 0.066 ppm for Palm Beach County. These levels were below
both the 1997 8-hour ozone standard and the 2008 8-hour ozone standard.
Preliminary data through 2008 indicates that the Southeast Florida Area
is in compliance of both the 1997 and 2008 8-hour ozone standards.
On January 5, 2005, EPA published nonattainment and attainment
designations for the PM2.5 standard (70 FR 944). The
Southeast Florida Area was designated as attainment for the
PM2.5 standard and has remained in attainment through 2008.
The level of the current PM2.5 annual standard is 15
micrograms per cubic meter ([mu]g/m3). The annual
PM2.5 design value for Southeast Florida Area for the period
of 2005-2007 was 8.6 [mu]g/m3. On October 17, 2006, EPA
promulgated a revised NAAQS for PM2.5 retaining the annual
PM2.5 standard of 15 [mu]g/m3 and revising the
24-hour PM2.5 standard from 65 [mu]g/m3 to 35
[mu]g/m3. The effective date for the new standard was
December 18, 2006.\1\ Florida submitted a letter dated December 12,
2007, which recommended that the entire State of Florida be designated
as attainment for the PM2.5 standard. On December 22, 2008,
in accordance with the CAA, EPA designated the State of Florida
(including Southeast Florida Area) as attainment of the 2006, 24-hour
PM2.5 standard. The daily PM2.5 design value for
Southeast Florida Area for the period of 2005-2007 was 24.3 [mu]g/
m3. Preliminary data through 2008 indicates that the
Southeast Florida Area is in compliance of both the 1997 and 2006
particulate matter standards.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ On February 24, 2009, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the DC
Circuit granted a petition for review of EPA's decision to retain
the annual PM2.5 standard of 15 [mu]g/m3 and
remanded the matter to EPA for further proceedings but did not
vacate the standard. American Farm Bureau Federation v. EPA (D.C.
Cir., No. 06-1410).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
EPA's primary consideration for determining the approvability of
Florida's request to remove Stage II vapor control requirements for new
and upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities in the Southeast Florida
Area, and for the phase out of Stage II requirements for existing
facilities in those counties, is contingent on whether this requested
action complies with section 110(l) of the CAA. Section 110(l) of the
CAA states that:
Each revision to an implementation plan submitted by a State
under this Chapter shall be adopted by such State after reasonable
notice and public hearing. The administrator shall not approve a
revision of a plan if the revision would interfere with any
applicable requirement concerning attainment and reasonable further
progress (as defined in Section 7501 of this title), or any other
applicable requirement of this chapter.
III. Today's Action
EPA is taking final action to approve the SIP revision submitted by
Florida for the purpose of removing Stage II vapor control requirements
for new and upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities in Miami-Dade,
Broward, and Palm Beach Counties, and phasing out Stage II requirements
for existing facilities in those counties. Additionally, EPA is
approving rule changes which would require new and upgraded gasoline
dispensing facilities and new bulk gasoline plants statewide to employ
Stage I vapor control systems, and would phase in Stage I vapor control
requirements statewide for existing gasoline dispensing facilities. EPA
is also responding to the adverse comment received on the September 16,
2008, rulemaking proposing to approve the aforementioned revisions (see
73 FR 53378). These approval actions are based on EPA's analyses of
whether these requests comply with section 110(l) of the CAA. EPA's
analyses for the State of Florida's submittal are described in detail
in the proposed and direct final rules published September 16, 2008 (73
FR 53404 and 73 FR 53378, respectively).
[[Page 26105]]
IV. Comment and Response
The following is a summary of the adverse comment received on the
direct final and proposed rules published, September 16, 2008, and
EPA's response to the comment.
Comment: The commenter alleges that removal of the Stage II vapor
recovery requirement with sole reliance on ORVR canisters to reduce
vehicle refueling emissions violates the EPA rules for such emissions
to be less than or equal to 0.2 grams/gallon. The commenter provided
data from a study that the commenter believes supports his claim.
Response: The commenter provided three sets of test data that he
alleges shows that existing ORVR systems emit in excess of 0.2 grams/
gallon. The results of the three sets of test data presented claim that
actual emissions range from 0.481 to 1.002 grams/gallon. The commenter
does not explain why he believes this is relevant to the removal of
Stage II requirements in the Southeast Florida Area.
In this rulemaking, EPA is making no finding on the validity of the
test data or the commenter's interpretation of the results presented.
Rather, EPA assessed whether excess emissions of the magnitude alleged
to occur by the commenter could impact the noninterference
demonstration prepared by Florida.
Removing the Stage II vapor recovery requirement from the Southeast
Florida Area's portion of the Florida SIP may result in a small,
temporary increase in VOC emissions within the three Southeast Florida
counties. In the May 31, 2007, SIP revision, Florida estimated
anthropogenic VOC emissions in the Southeast Florida Area to be 512.6
tons/day in 2005, falling to 494.6 tons/day in 2010 and 467.2 tons/day
in 2015. By comparison, 1990 VOC emission rates were 867.8 tons/day.
Florida has projected a continued decrease in VOC emissions from 2005
to 2010 and 2015 even with the removal of Stage II vapor recovery
systems. Specifically, Florida projects reductions from 2005 VOC
emission rates of 18 tons/day in 2010 and 45.4 tons/day in 2015. The
following table shows the expected emission changes in comparison with
the emissions that would occur if the Stage II vapor recovery
requirement were to remain in force.
Table 1--Total VOC \2\ Emissions From Southeast Florida Area With & Without Vehicle Refueling (Stage II)
[Tons per day]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1990 2005 2010 2015
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
without Stage without Stage without Stage
II with Stage II with Stage II II with Stage II II
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Miami-Dade.............................................. 399.8 208.3 200.0 202.1 191.6 192.8
Broward................................................. 239.6 154.6 145.3 147.2 135.9 136.9
Palm Beach.............................................. 228.4 149.7 143.2 144.7 136.7 137.5
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SE Florida Total.................................... 867.8 512.6 488.4 494.0 464.2 467.2
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using 2007\\ gasoline and gasohol sales data, if the commenter's
data are accurate, the Southeast Florida Area emission inventories
projections for 2010 and 2015 would only increase by 1.98 to 5.64 tons/
day. This is significantly less than the expected reductions projected
to occur from 2005 to 2010 (18 tons/day) and 2015 (45 tons/day). Hence,
EPA concludes that even if the commenter's data are accurate, emissions
of VOCs in the Southeast Florida Area would still continue to decrease
from 2005 emission levels. Since the Southeast Florida Area was in
attainment in 2005 for the ozone NAAQS, and continues to be in
attainment, EPA has determined that removal of Stage II vapor recovery
systems in the Southeast Florida Area would not result in interference
with attainment or maintenance of the ozone NAAQS. Similarly, the
Southeast Florida area is in attainment for the particulate matter
NAAQS and, for the reasons stated in the proposal and previous direct
final rule, EPA has determined that removal of Stage II vapor recovery
systems in the Southeast Florida Area would not result in interference
with attainment or maintenance of the ozone and particulate matter
NAAQS, or any other Clean Air Act applicable requirement.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ The total VOC emissions in this area also include a biogenic
component that is assumed constant over time. The biogenic VOC
emissions for the individual counties are estimated at 211.3 tpd for
Miami-Dade, 174.5 tpd for Broward, and 399.6 tpd for Palm Beach.
These amounts can be added to the man-made emissions to get the
total VOC emissions.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Based on the factors mentioned above, EPA believes that Florida's
demonstration to remove the Stage II requirement from the Florida SIP
for the Southeast Florida Area is consistent with section 110(l) of the
CAA.
V. Final Action
EPA is taking final action to approve the revisions to the Florida
SIP for the purpose of removing Stage II vapor control requirements for
new and upgraded gasoline dispensing facilities in Miami-Dade, Broward,
and Palm Beach Counties, and phasing out Stage II requirements for
existing facilities in those counties. Additionally, EPA is approving
rule changes that would require new and upgraded gasoline dispensing
facilities and new bulk gasoline plants statewide to employ Stage I
vapor control systems, and would phase in Stage I vapor control
requirements statewide for existing gasoline dispensing facilities.
This SIP revision includes changes to F.A.C. Chapters 62-210.200
Definitions, 62-210.310 Air General Permits, 62-210.920 Air General
Permit Forms, 62-252.200 Definitions, 62-252.300 Gasoline Dispensing
Facilities--Stage I Vapor Recovery, 62-252.400 Gasoline Dispensing
Facilities--Stage II Vapor Recovery, 62-252.500 Gasoline Tanker Trucks,
62-296-418 Bulk Gasoline Plants, and 62-296.509 Bulk Gasoline Plants
(Repealed). These revisions are consistent with EPA guidance and the
CAA, as amended in 1990.
VI. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP
submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable
Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in
reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve State choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this
action merely approves State law as meeting Federal requirements and
does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by State
law. For that reason, this action:
Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' subject to
review by the Office
[[Page 26106]]
of Management and Budget under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735,
October 4, 1993);
Does not impose an information collection burden under the
provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.);
Is certified as not having a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.);
Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4);
Does not have Federalism implications as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);
Is not an economically significant regulatory action based
on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997);
Is not a significant regulatory action subject to
Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);
Is not subject to requirements of Section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272
note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent
with the CAA; and
Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to
address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental
effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under
Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).
In addition, this rule does not have Tribal implications as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000),
because the SIP is not approved to apply in Indian country located in
the State, and EPA notes that it will not impose substantial direct
costs on Tribal governments or preempt Tribal law.
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and
other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review
of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for
the appropriate circuit by July 31, 2009. Filing a petition for
reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect
the finality of this action for the purposes of judicial review nor
does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may
be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or
action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, particulate matter, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: May 11, 2009.
Beverly H. Banister,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart K--Florida
0
2. Section 52.520(c) is amended by:
0
a. Under Chapter 62-210 revising entries for ``62-210.200'' and ``62-
210.300'' and
0
b. Under Chapter 62-252 revising entries for ``62-252.200'', ``62-
252.300'', ``62-252.400'' and ``62-252.500'' and
0
c. Under Chapter 62-296, revising entry for ``62-296-509'' and
0
d. Under Chapter 62-210, adding entries for ``62-210.310'' and ``62-
210.920'' and
0
e. Under Chapter 62-296, adding the entry for ``62-296.418'' to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.520 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Florida Regulations
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State EPA approval
State citation Title/subject effective date date Explanation
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 62-210 Stationary Sources--General Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
62-210.200................. Definitions..... 9/4/2006 June 1, 2009.
[Insert
citation of
publication].
* * * * * * *
62-210.300................. Permits Required 9/4/2006 June 1, 2009.
[Insert
citation of
publication].
62-210.310................. Air General 9/4/2006 June 1, 2009.
Permits. [Insert
citation of
publication].
* * * * * * *
62-210.920................. Air General 9/4/2006 June 1, 2009.
Permit Forms. [Insert
citation of
publication].
[[Page 26107]]
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 62-252 Gasoline Vapor Control
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
62-252.200................. Definitions..... 9/4/2006 June 1, 2009.
[Insert
citation of
publication].
62-252.300................. Gasoline 9/4/2006 June 1, 2009.
Dispensing [Insert
Facilities- citation of
Stage I Vapor publication].
Recovery.
62-252.400................. Gasoline 9/4/2006 June 1, 2009.
Dispensing [Insert
Facilities- citation of
Stage II Vapor publication].
Recovery.
62-252.500................. Gasoline Tanker 9/4/2006 June 1, 2009.
Trucks. [Insert
citation of
publication].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Chapter 62-296 Stationary Sources--Emission Standards
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
62-296.418................. Bulk Gasoline 9/4/2006 June 1, 2009.
Plants. [Insert
citation of
publication].
* * * * * * *
62-296.509................. Bulk Gasoline .............. June 1, 2009. Repealed.
Plants. [Insert
citation of
publication].
* * * * * * *
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
[FR Doc. E9-12575 Filed 5-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
