Intent To Prepare a Draft Supplement No. 2 to the Final Environmental Impact Statement for the West Tennessee Tributaries (WTT) General Reevaluation, 25723-25724 [E9-12567]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Notices
mission and functions. Written
statements may be submitted at any
time or in response to the stated agenda
of planned meeting of the Committee.
All written statements shall be
submitted to the Designated Federal
Officer for the Committee, and this
individual will ensure that the written
statements are provided to the
membership for their consideration.
Contact information for the Department
of Defense Audit Advisory Committee’s
Designated Federal Officer can be
obtained from the GSA’s FACA
Database—https://www.fido.gov/
facadatabase/public.asp.
The Designated Federal Officer,
pursuant to 41 CFR 102–3.150, will
announce planned meetings of the
Committee. The Designated Federal
Officer, at that time, may provide
additional guidance on the submission
of written statements that are in
response to the stated agenda for the
planned meeting in question.
Dated: May 20, 2009.
Morgan E. Frazier,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
[FR Doc. E9–12500 Filed 5–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of
Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft Supplement
No. 2 to the Final Environmental
Impact Statement for the West
Tennessee Tributaries (WTT) General
Reevaluation
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S.
Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
SUMMARY: The draft supplement no. 2
will be prepared in conjunction with a
general reevaluation report (GRR) and
will supplement the ‘‘Final Supplement
to the Final Environmental Impact
Statement, West Tennessee Tributaries
Project (Obion-Forked Deer River
Basin),’’ filed with the Environmental
Protection Agency on February 25,
1983. A general reevaluation study will
be conducted for the entire WTT project
area to determine if there is still a
federal interest in pursuing a flood risk
management project and, if so,
recommend a plan of improvement. The
GRR and draft supplement no. 2 to the
final environmental impact statement
(FEIS) will focus on methods that
reduce flood risks within the Obion and
Forked Deer watersheds by restoring
natural floodplain functions and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:24 May 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
reducing sedimentation that could cause
channel blockages.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Michael Thron, telephone (901) 544–
0708, CEMVM–PM–E, 167 N. Main,
Room B–202, Memphis, TN 38103, email—john.m.thron@usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Proposed Action: The project study
consists of determining flood risk
management solutions in the Obion and
Forked Deer watersheds in west
Tennessee. The project is authorized by
Section 203 of the Flood Control Act of
June 30, 1948 (Pub. L. 80–858, 62 Stat.
1171, 1175, 1178), and amended and
modified by Section 207 of the Rivers
and Harbors Act of November 7, 1966
(Pub. L. 89–789, 80 Stat. 1405), and
further amended by Section 3 of the
Water Resources Development Act of
March 7, 1974 (Pub. L. 93–251, 88 Stat.
12, 14) and Section 183 of the Water
Resources Development Act of October
22, 1976 (Pub. L. 94–587, 90 Stat. 2917).
Construction began in 1961. The initial
project environmental impact statement
(EIS) was filed with the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) on
February 3, 1971. The federal court
determined in 1973 that the 1971 EIS
prepared by the Corps did not meet
National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) standards and enjoined the
Corps from further construction on
March 2, 1973. The Corps filed a revised
EIS with CEQ on July 21, 1975, entitled,
‘‘Final Environmental Impact Statement
West Tennessee Tributaries Project;’’
however, the federal court in its
decision of January 27, 1978 again
determined that the FEIS was not
sufficient to meet NEPA standards and
directed that it be supplemented. A final
supplement to the FEIS was filed with
the Environmental Protection Agency
on February 25, 1983 (Record of
Decision signed August 8, 1983),
entitled, ‘‘Final Supplement to the Final
Environmental Impact Statement, West
Tennessee Tributaries Project.’’ The
final supplement to the FEIS included
the addition of certain soil erosion
control and timber, fish, and wildlife
conservation features to the flood
control plan. Construction resumed in
1985 after the issuance of a consent
order (Civil Action Number C–70–349)
stating the Corps was allowed to
proceed provided they follow a protocol
in the acquisition of the 32,000 acres of
mitigation lands authorized by Section
3 of the Water Resources Development
Act of 1974 (Pub. L. 93–251, 88 Stat. 12,
14). However, in June of 1987, the State
of Tennessee denied water quality
certification for the next item of work
and construction was again suspended.
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25723
All attempts to resolve the denial were
unproductive. By April of 1990, the
Corps had acquired 13,527 acres of
mitigation lands for the project. Several
demonstration projects were pursued
between 1992 and 2008. Most notably,
a limited reevaluation was performed in
1996 for a demonstration project in the
Middle Fork Forked Deer River and a
demonstration project in the Stokes
Creek watershed. However, the costs of
compliance with the consent order were
too great to pursue the demonstration
projects. By letter dated December 23,
2008, the State of Tennessee requested
that a general reevaluation study be
conducted for the entire project area to
determine if there is still a federal
interest in pursuing a flood risk
management project and, if so,
recommend a plan of improvement.
2. Reasonable Alternatives: A wide
range of alternatives will be examined
for the study. Alternatives will focus on
methods that control sediment entering
the Obion and Forked Deer watersheds,
restore natural floodplain functions, and
comply with the consent order while
achieving the authorized project
purpose of flood risk management.
Comparisons will be made among the
alternative plans, including the ‘‘no
action’’ alternative.
3. The Scoping Process: The purpose
of this notice is to advise all interested
parties of the intent to supplement the
‘‘Final Supplement to the Final
Environmental Impact Statement, West
Tennessee Tributaries Project (ObionForked Deer River Basin)’’ and to solicit
comments and information concerning
the study. A public involvement
program has been initiated and will be
maintained throughout the study to
solicit input from individuals and
interested parties and to identify any
concerns or significant issues related to
the project. This notice is being
circulated to federal, state, and local
environmental resource and regulatory
agencies; Indian Tribes; nongovernmental organizations; and the
general public. All interested parties are
encouraged to participate in the scoping
process. A public scoping meeting will
be held on June 23, 2009, 7 p.m., at the
Temple Baptist Church, 9105 East Van
Hook, Milan, Tennessee. It is
anticipated that the draft supplement
no. 2 to the FEIS will be available for
public review during the fall of 2014. A
public meeting will be held during the
review period to receive comments and
address questions concerning the draft
report.
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
25724
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Notices
Dated: May 22, 2009.
Thomas P. Smith,
Colonel, Corps of Engineers, District Engineer,
Memphis District.
[FR Doc. E9–12567 Filed 5–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710–KS–P
Dated: May 21, 2009.
Morgan E. Frazier,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
ROUTINE USE OF THE RECORDS MAINTAINED IN
THE SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATEGORIES OF USERS
AND THE PURPOSE OF SUCH USES:
GNSA 10
SYSTEM NAME:
NSA/CSS Personnel Security File
(February 22, 1993, 58 FR 10531).
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
CHANGES:
[Docket ID DOD–2009–OS–0072]
CATEGORIES OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
*
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records
AGENCY: National Security Agency/
Central Security Service, DoD.
ACTION: Notice to Alter a System of
Records.
SUMMARY: The National Security
Agency/Central Security Service is
proposing to alter an exempt system of
records to its existing inventory of
record systems subject to the Privacy
Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as
amended.
DATES: This proposed action would be
effective without further notice on June
29, 2009 unless comments are received
which result in a contrary
determination.
Send comments to the
National Security Agency/Central
Security Service, Office of Policy, 9800
Savage Road, Suite 6248, Ft. George G.
Meade, MD 20755–6248.
ADDRESSES:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Ms.
Anne Hill at (301) 688–6527.
The
National Security Agency’s record
system notices for records systems
subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5
U.S.C. 552a), as amended, have been
published in the Federal Register and
are available from the address above.
The proposed system report, as
required by 5 U.S.C. 552a(r) of the
Privacy Act of 1974, as amended, was
submitted on May 21, 2009, to the
House Committee on Oversight and
Government Reform, the Senate
Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs, and the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB)
pursuant to paragraph 4c of Appendix I
to OMB Circular No. A–130, ‘Federal
Agency Responsibilities for Maintaining
Records About Individuals,’ dated
February 8, 1996 (February 20, 1996, 61
FR 6427).
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:24 May 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
*
*
*
*
Delete entry and replace with
‘‘Records relevant to access classified
information, assignment and
reassignment, foreign official and
unofficial travel, access to NSA/CSS
spaces or facilities, access to NSA’s
Intranet, and other personnel actions
where security represents a relevant and
valid element of the determination.
Records may consist of name, Social
Security Number (SSN), home address,
home phone number, security file
number, statement of personal history,
photograph, fingerprint data,
agreements with respect to specific
security processing procedures, security
processing forms and records,
investigative and polygraph reports,
appeal records, incident and complaint
reports, unsolicited information when
relevant, reports by domestic law
enforcement agencies when relevant,
clearance data, access authorization,
foreign travel data, security secrecy
agreements and financial data’’.
AUTHORITY FOR MAINTENANCE OF SYSTEM:
Delete entry and replace with ‘‘50
U.S.C. Sections 831–835, Personnel
Security Procedures in the National
Security Agency; E.O.10450, as
amended, Security Requirements for
Government Employment; E.O.10865, as
amended, Safeguarding Classified
Information Within Industry, E.O.12968,
Access to Classified Information; and
E.O 9397 (SSN)’’.
PURPOSE(S):
Delete entry and replace with ‘‘The
records are used for the purpose of
determining suitability, eligibility, or
qualification for civil employment,
federal contracts, or access to classified
information and/or NSA/CSS spaces
and facilities; to determine access to
NSA’s Intranet, to determine and ensure
continued eligibility for access to
classified information; to record
adjudicative actions and
determinations; to record processing
steps taken; to document due process
actions taken; to make determinations
on official and unofficial foreign travel;
to make determinations on assignment
PO 00000
Frm 00028
and reassignment and other actions
where security represents a relevant and
valid element of the determination’’.
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Delete entry and replace with ‘‘In
addition to those disclosures generally
permitted under 5 U.S.C. 552a(b) of the
Privacy Act of 1974, these records
contained therein may specifically be
disclosed outside the DoD as a routine
use pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(b)(3) as
follows:
To agencies outside DoD, to include
but not limited to other clearance holder
agencies or agencies charged with
making clearance determinations,
government agencies involved with
national security or clearance
investigations, other government
agencies and private contractors
requiring clearance status information
and authorized to receive same; the
Director National Intelligence (DNI) and
his General Counsel in the event of
litigation or anticipated litigation with
respect to unauthorized disclosures of
classified intelligence or intelligence
sources and methods and related court
actions; judicial branch elements
pursuant to specific court orders or
litigation.
In addition, other government
agencies or private contractors may be
informed of information developed by
NSA which bears on assignee’s or
affiliate’s status at NSA with regard to
security considerations.
To local law enforcement (county and
state) and other federal, state, or local
agencies or departments for hiring
purposes.
To any entity or individual under
contract with NSA/CSS for the purpose
of providing security-related services.
To any party, council, representative,
and/or witness in any legal proceeding,
where pertinent, to which DoD is a
party before a court or administrative
body (including, but not limited to, the
Equal Employment Opportunity
Commission and Merit System
Protection Board).
The DoD ‘Blanket Routine Uses’ set
forth at the beginning of the NSA/CSS’
compilation of systems of records
notices apply to this system’’.
POLICIES AND PRACTICES FOR STORING,
RETRIEVING, ACCESSING, RETAINING, AND
DISPOSING OF RECORDS IN THE SYSTEM:
STORAGE:
Delete entry and replace with ‘‘Paper
in file folders and electronic storage
media’’.
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 102 (Friday, May 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25723-25724]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12567]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Army; Corps of Engineers
Intent To Prepare a Draft Supplement No. 2 to the Final
Environmental Impact Statement for the West Tennessee Tributaries (WTT)
General Reevaluation
AGENCY: Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, DoD.
ACTION: Notice of Intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The draft supplement no. 2 will be prepared in conjunction
with a general reevaluation report (GRR) and will supplement the
``Final Supplement to the Final Environmental Impact Statement, West
Tennessee Tributaries Project (Obion-Forked Deer River Basin),'' filed
with the Environmental Protection Agency on February 25, 1983. A
general reevaluation study will be conducted for the entire WTT project
area to determine if there is still a federal interest in pursuing a
flood risk management project and, if so, recommend a plan of
improvement. The GRR and draft supplement no. 2 to the final
environmental impact statement (FEIS) will focus on methods that reduce
flood risks within the Obion and Forked Deer watersheds by restoring
natural floodplain functions and reducing sedimentation that could
cause channel blockages.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Michael Thron, telephone (901)
544-0708, CEMVM-PM-E, 167 N. Main, Room B-202, Memphis, TN 38103, e-
mail_john.m.thron@usace.army.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
1. Proposed Action: The project study consists of determining flood
risk management solutions in the Obion and Forked Deer watersheds in
west Tennessee. The project is authorized by Section 203 of the Flood
Control Act of June 30, 1948 (Pub. L. 80-858, 62 Stat. 1171, 1175,
1178), and amended and modified by Section 207 of the Rivers and
Harbors Act of November 7, 1966 (Pub. L. 89-789, 80 Stat. 1405), and
further amended by Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of
March 7, 1974 (Pub. L. 93-251, 88 Stat. 12, 14) and Section 183 of the
Water Resources Development Act of October 22, 1976 (Pub. L. 94-587, 90
Stat. 2917). Construction began in 1961. The initial project
environmental impact statement (EIS) was filed with the Council on
Environmental Quality (CEQ) on February 3, 1971. The federal court
determined in 1973 that the 1971 EIS prepared by the Corps did not meet
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) standards and enjoined the
Corps from further construction on March 2, 1973. The Corps filed a
revised EIS with CEQ on July 21, 1975, entitled, ``Final Environmental
Impact Statement West Tennessee Tributaries Project;'' however, the
federal court in its decision of January 27, 1978 again determined that
the FEIS was not sufficient to meet NEPA standards and directed that it
be supplemented. A final supplement to the FEIS was filed with the
Environmental Protection Agency on February 25, 1983 (Record of
Decision signed August 8, 1983), entitled, ``Final Supplement to the
Final Environmental Impact Statement, West Tennessee Tributaries
Project.'' The final supplement to the FEIS included the addition of
certain soil erosion control and timber, fish, and wildlife
conservation features to the flood control plan. Construction resumed
in 1985 after the issuance of a consent order (Civil Action Number C-
70-349) stating the Corps was allowed to proceed provided they follow a
protocol in the acquisition of the 32,000 acres of mitigation lands
authorized by Section 3 of the Water Resources Development Act of 1974
(Pub. L. 93-251, 88 Stat. 12, 14). However, in June of 1987, the State
of Tennessee denied water quality certification for the next item of
work and construction was again suspended. All attempts to resolve the
denial were unproductive. By April of 1990, the Corps had acquired
13,527 acres of mitigation lands for the project. Several demonstration
projects were pursued between 1992 and 2008. Most notably, a limited
reevaluation was performed in 1996 for a demonstration project in the
Middle Fork Forked Deer River and a demonstration project in the Stokes
Creek watershed. However, the costs of compliance with the consent
order were too great to pursue the demonstration projects. By letter
dated December 23, 2008, the State of Tennessee requested that a
general reevaluation study be conducted for the entire project area to
determine if there is still a federal interest in pursuing a flood risk
management project and, if so, recommend a plan of improvement.
2. Reasonable Alternatives: A wide range of alternatives will be
examined for the study. Alternatives will focus on methods that control
sediment entering the Obion and Forked Deer watersheds, restore natural
floodplain functions, and comply with the consent order while achieving
the authorized project purpose of flood risk management. Comparisons
will be made among the alternative plans, including the ``no action''
alternative.
3. The Scoping Process: The purpose of this notice is to advise all
interested parties of the intent to supplement the ``Final Supplement
to the Final Environmental Impact Statement, West Tennessee Tributaries
Project (Obion-Forked Deer River Basin)'' and to solicit comments and
information concerning the study. A public involvement program has been
initiated and will be maintained throughout the study to solicit input
from individuals and interested parties and to identify any concerns or
significant issues related to the project. This notice is being
circulated to federal, state, and local environmental resource and
regulatory agencies; Indian Tribes; non-governmental organizations; and
the general public. All interested parties are encouraged to
participate in the scoping process. A public scoping meeting will be
held on June 23, 2009, 7 p.m., at the Temple Baptist Church, 9105 East
Van Hook, Milan, Tennessee. It is anticipated that the draft supplement
no. 2 to the FEIS will be available for public review during the fall
of 2014. A public meeting will be held during the review period to
receive comments and address questions concerning the draft report.
[[Page 25724]]
Dated: May 22, 2009.
Thomas P. Smith,
Colonel, Corps of Engineers, District Engineer, Memphis District.
[FR Doc. E9-12567 Filed 5-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3710-KS-P