Environmental Impact Statements: National Summary of Rescinded Notices of Intent, 25797-25798 [E9-12526]
Download as PDF
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Notices
1200 Peachtree Street, N.E.—Box 123,
Atlanta, Georgia 30309.
The Norfolk Southern Corporation
(NS) request a waiver pertaining to the
use of a device for automated execution
of certain FRA required tests made at
interlockings and control points on the
NS system.
The reasons given for the proposed
waiver is to permit NS to use the
automated test system, known as the
InterTest® system, for subject testing in
lieu of tests being performed manually,
as well as to permit use of electronic
signature for documentation and storage
of results of tests performed during two
year and in service testing.
The InterTest® system is a processorbased system that performs testing by
electronically exercising the inputs to
the interlocking and control point
locking circuitry in a manner which
replicates that done by humans during
a manual test. The interlocking tester
consists of three subsystems that are
tied together by a central control
computer.
NS proposes to use the automated
tester to make the following FRA
required 2-year tests: 49 CFR 236.378—
Time Locking; 49 CFR 236.379—Route
Locking; 49 CFR 236.380—Indication
Locking;
NS proposes to use the automated
tester to make the following in service
tests: 49 CFR 236.201—Track circuit
control of signals; 49 CFR 236.202—
Signal governing movements over handoperated switch; 49 CFR 236.204—
Track signaled for movements in both
directions, requirements; 49 CFR
236.402—Signals controlled by track
circuits and control operator; 49 CFR
236.403—Signals at control point; 49
CFR 236.404—Signal at adjacent control
points; 49 CFR 236.405—Track signaled
for movements in both directions,
change of direction of traffic; 49 CFR
236.107—Ground Tests; and to create
and maintain records of tests according
to 49 CFR 236.110—Results of tests.
Any interested party desiring to
protest the granting of an application
shall set forth specifically the grounds
upon which the protest is made, and
include a concise statement of the
interest of the party in the proceeding.
Additionally, one copy of the protest
shall be furnished to the applicant at the
address listed above.
FRA expects to be able to determine
these matters without an oral hearing.
However, if a specific request for an oral
hearing is accompanied by a showing
that the party is unable to adequately
present his or her position by written
statements, an application may be set
for public hearing.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:24 May 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
Interested parties are invited to
participate in these proceedings by
submitting written views, data, or
comments. FRA does not anticipate
scheduling a public hearing in
connection with these proceedings since
the facts do not appear to warrant a
hearing. If any interested party desires
an opportunity for oral comment, they
should notify FRA, in writing, before
the end of the comment period and
specify the basis for their request.
All communications concerning these
proceedings should identify the
appropriate docket number (e.g., Waiver
Petition Docket Number FRA–2009–
0037) and may be submitted by any of
the following methods:
• Web site: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the online
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: Docket Operations Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
Communications received within 45
days of the date of this notice will be
considered by FRA before final action is
taken. Comments received after that
date will be considered as far as
practicable. All written communications
concerning these proceedings are
available for examination during regular
business hours (9 a.m.—5 p.m.) at the
above facility. All documents in the
public docket are also available for
inspection and copying on the Internet
at the docket facility’s Web site at
https://www.regulations.gov.
Anyone is able to search the
electronic form of any written
communications and comments
received into any of our dockets by the
name of the individual submitting the
comment (or signing the comment, if
submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may
review DOT’s complete Privacy Act
Statement in the Federal Register
published on April 11, 2000 (Volume
65, Number 70; Pages 19477–78).
Issued in Washington, DC; on May 22,
2009.
Grady C. Cothen, Jr.,
Deputy Associate Administrator for Safety
Standards and Program Development.
[FR Doc. E9–12423 Filed 5–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–06–P
PO 00000
Frm 00101
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25797
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statements:
National Summary of Rescinded
Notices of Intent
AGENCY: Federal Highway
Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this
notice to advise the public that 12 States
have rescinded Notices of Intent (NOI)
to prepare 17 Environmental Impact
Statements (EISs) for proposed highway
projects. FHWA Division Offices, in
consultation with the State Departments
of Transportation (State DOT),
determined that eight projects were no
longer viable and have formally
cancelled the projects. No resources will
be expended on these projects; the
environmental review process has been
terminated. Seven projects are being
reevaluated and, or have been reduced
in scope and now meet the criteria for
an Environmental Assessment (EA) or a
Categorical Exclusion (CE). Two projects
rescinded NOIs and will issue new NOIs
as the project limits and impacts have
changed.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Bethaney Bacher-Gresock, Office of
Project Development and Environmental
Review, (202) 366–4196; Janet Myers,
Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366–
2019; Federal Highway Administration,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
An electronic copy of this document
may be downloaded by accessing the
Federal Register’s home page at:
https://www.archives.gov and the
Government Printing Office’s Web page
at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara.
Background
The FHWA, as lead Federal agency
under the National Environmental
Policy Act and in furtherance of its
oversight and stewardship
responsibilities under the Federal-aid
Highway Program, has requested that its
Division Offices review, with the State
DOTs, the status of all EISs and place
those projects that are not actively
progressing in a timely manner in an
inactive project status. The FHWA
maintains lists of active and inactive
projects on its Web site at
https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/.
The FHWA has determined that inactive
projects that are no longer a priority or
that lack resources should be rescinded
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
25798
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 102 / Friday, May 29, 2009 / Notices
with a Federal Register notice notifying
the public that project activity has been
terminated. As always, FHWA
encourages State DOTs to work with
their FHWA Division Office to
determine when it is most prudent to
initiate an EIS in order to best balance
available resources as well as the
expectations of the public.
The FHWA is issuing this notice to
advise the public that 12 States
(California, Colorado, Idaho, Indiana,
Massachusetts, Minnesota, Mississippi,
Missouri, New York, Ohio,
Pennsylvania, Tennessee) have recently
rescinded previously issued NOIs for 17
EISs for proposed highway projects. A
listing of these projects, general
location, original NOI date of
publication in the Federal Register, and
the date that the NOI was formally
rescinded by notice published in the
Federal Register, is provided below.
The FHWA Division Offices, in
consultation with the State DOTs,
determined that eight of these projects
were no longer viable projects and have
formally cancelled those projects. The
projects are: Northwest Corridor/
Northwest Parkway project in
Broomfield and Jefferson Counties,
Colorado; TH 169 in Millie Lacs and
Crow Wing Counties, Minnesota; TH 10
project in Sherburne County,
Minnesota; TH 10 in Otter Tail and
Wadena Counties, Minnesota; TH 14 in
Olmsted County, Minnesota; I 55
connection to I 20 in Hinds and
Madison Counties, Mississippi;
improvements to the transportation
system in Lawrence, Christian and
Greene Counties, Missouri; and US–127
and SR–63/SR–4 Interchange highway
improvements near Trenton in Butler
County, Ohio.
The FHWA Division Offices, in
consultation with the State DOTs,
determined that seven projects should
be reevaluated and, or reduced in scope.
In California, the US 395 project from I
15 to Farmington Road in San
Bernardino County is being reduced in
scope; the I 5 HOV Truck Lanes project
between SR 14 and Parker Road in Los
Angeles County has been reviewed and
will now be processed with an EA. In
Idaho, the I 84 Karcher Interchange
project in Ada and Canyon Counties
will now most likely be processed as an
EA. In Indiana, the proposed relocation
of railroad lines in Knox County,
Indiana and Lawrence County, IL will
be reduced in scope. In Massachusetts,
the Berkley-Dighton Bridge over the
Taunton River, Bristol County project
has been reduced in scope and now
meets the criteria for a CE. In New York,
the Millennium Parkway project in
Chautauqua County has been reduced in
scope and now meets the criteria for a
CE. In Pennsylvania, SR 56 in
Johnstown has been reduced in scope
and now meets the criteria for a CE.
In addition, the FHWA Division
Office, in consultation with the State
DOT, determined that two projects in
Tennessee had changed project limits
and impacts therefore it was best to
rescind the original NOIs and issue new
NOIs. The SR 374 project from SR 13 to
SR 76 in Montgomery County,
Tennessee will reissue an NOI. The
North Second Street Connector project
in Shelby County issued a new NOI on
February 5, 2009.
State
Project name—location
CA ..................................
CA ..................................
U.S. 395 Realignment—San Bernardino County ........................................................
Interstate 5 (I–5) HOV Truck Lanes SR14 and Parker Road Interchange—Los Angeles County.
Northwest Corridor/Northwest Parkway—Broomfield and Jefferson Counties ...........
I 84 Karcher Interchange—Ada and Canyon Counties ..............................................
Railroad Line Relocations—Knox County, Indiana and Lawrence County Illinois .....
Berkley-Dighton Bridge over the Taunton River—Bristol County ...............................
TH 169—Mille Lacs and Crow Wing Counties ...........................................................
CO ..................................
ID ...................................
IN ...................................
MA ..................................
MN .................................
MN .................................
MN .................................
MN .................................
MS ..................................
MO .................................
NY ..................................
OH ..................................
PA ..................................
TN ..................................
TN ..................................
Rescinded
date
NOI date
Tier 1—TH 10—Sherburne County .............................................................................
TH 10—Otter Tail and Wadena Counties ...................................................................
TH 14—Olmstead County ...........................................................................................
Interstate Facility Connecting I–55 with I–20—Hinds and Madison Counties ............
Transportation System in Lawrence Christian and Green Counties ..........................
Millennium Parkway Project Chautauqua County .......................................................
Highway Improvement Project US–127 and SR–63/SR–4 Interchange—Trenton,
Butler County.
SR 56—Johnstown ......................................................................................................
State Route 374, State Route 13, State Route 76—Montgomery County .................
North Second Street Connector—Shelby County .......................................................
7/5/2006
5/10/2007
10/30/2008
11/10/2008
7/21/2003
7/17/2007
3/16/2007
10/9/1985
7/17/2000
2/4/2002
7/28/2003
3/27/2003
10/7/2002
8/10/2007
7/1/2008
7/17/2008
11/25/2008
6/19/2008
7/8/2009
12/27/2007
10/6/2000
10/10/2008
10/10/2008
10/10/2008
10/1/2008
1/23/2009
3/3/2009
6/30/2008
7/14/2001
11/12/1996
11/2/2002
10/l/2008
12/24/2008
12/24/2008
(1)
1 Unknown.
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with NOTICES
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Program Number 20.205, Highway Planning
and Construction. The regulations
implementing Executive Order 12372
regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this
program.)
Issued on: May 14, 2009.
Jeffrey F. Paniati,
Acting Deputy Federal Highway
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9–12526 Filed 5–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–22–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:24 May 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Surface Transportation Board
[STB Finance Docket No. 35249]
Kern W. Schumacher—Continuance in
Control Exemption—Granada Railway,
LLC and Natchez Railway, LLC
Kern W. Schumacher (Mr.
Schumacher), a noncarrier, has filed a
verified notice of exemption under 49
CFR 1180.2(d)(2) to continue in control
of Grenada Railway, LLC (Grenada), and
Natchez Railway, LLC (Natchez), upon
PO 00000
Frm 00102
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Grenada’s and Natchez’s becoming Class
III rail carriers.
This transaction is related to a
concurrently filed verified notice of
exemption in STB Finance Docket No.
35247, Grenada Railway, LLC—
Acquisition and Operation Exemption—
Illinois Central Railroad Company and
Waterloo Railway Company, wherein
Grenada seeks to acquire from the
Illinois Central Railroad Company (ICR)
and to operate an approximately 175.4mile rail line between milepost 403.0 at
Southhaven, MS, and milepost 703.8
near Canton, MS, and to acquire from
E:\FR\FM\29MYN1.SGM
29MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 102 (Friday, May 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25797-25798]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12526]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Environmental Impact Statements: National Summary of Rescinded
Notices of Intent
AGENCY: Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that 12
States have rescinded Notices of Intent (NOI) to prepare 17
Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) for proposed highway projects.
FHWA Division Offices, in consultation with the State Departments of
Transportation (State DOT), determined that eight projects were no
longer viable and have formally cancelled the projects. No resources
will be expended on these projects; the environmental review process
has been terminated. Seven projects are being reevaluated and, or have
been reduced in scope and now meet the criteria for an Environmental
Assessment (EA) or a Categorical Exclusion (CE). Two projects rescinded
NOIs and will issue new NOIs as the project limits and impacts have
changed.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Bethaney Bacher-Gresock, Office of
Project Development and Environmental Review, (202) 366-4196; Janet
Myers, Office of the Chief Counsel, (202) 366-2019; Federal Highway
Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Electronic Access
An electronic copy of this document may be downloaded by accessing
the Federal Register's home page at: https://www.archives.gov and the
Government Printing Office's Web page at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara.
Background
The FHWA, as lead Federal agency under the National Environmental
Policy Act and in furtherance of its oversight and stewardship
responsibilities under the Federal-aid Highway Program, has requested
that its Division Offices review, with the State DOTs, the status of
all EISs and place those projects that are not actively progressing in
a timely manner in an inactive project status. The FHWA maintains lists
of active and inactive projects on its Web site at https://www.environment.fhwa.dot.gov/. The FHWA has determined that inactive
projects that are no longer a priority or that lack resources should be
rescinded
[[Page 25798]]
with a Federal Register notice notifying the public that project
activity has been terminated. As always, FHWA encourages State DOTs to
work with their FHWA Division Office to determine when it is most
prudent to initiate an EIS in order to best balance available resources
as well as the expectations of the public.
The FHWA is issuing this notice to advise the public that 12 States
(California, Colorado, Idaho, Indiana, Massachusetts, Minnesota,
Mississippi, Missouri, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee) have
recently rescinded previously issued NOIs for 17 EISs for proposed
highway projects. A listing of these projects, general location,
original NOI date of publication in the Federal Register, and the date
that the NOI was formally rescinded by notice published in the Federal
Register, is provided below.
The FHWA Division Offices, in consultation with the State DOTs,
determined that eight of these projects were no longer viable projects
and have formally cancelled those projects. The projects are: Northwest
Corridor/Northwest Parkway project in Broomfield and Jefferson
Counties, Colorado; TH 169 in Millie Lacs and Crow Wing Counties,
Minnesota; TH 10 project in Sherburne County, Minnesota; TH 10 in Otter
Tail and Wadena Counties, Minnesota; TH 14 in Olmsted County,
Minnesota; I 55 connection to I 20 in Hinds and Madison Counties,
Mississippi; improvements to the transportation system in Lawrence,
Christian and Greene Counties, Missouri; and US-127 and SR-63/SR-4
Interchange highway improvements near Trenton in Butler County, Ohio.
The FHWA Division Offices, in consultation with the State DOTs,
determined that seven projects should be reevaluated and, or reduced in
scope. In California, the US 395 project from I 15 to Farmington Road
in San Bernardino County is being reduced in scope; the I 5 HOV Truck
Lanes project between SR 14 and Parker Road in Los Angeles County has
been reviewed and will now be processed with an EA. In Idaho, the I 84
Karcher Interchange project in Ada and Canyon Counties will now most
likely be processed as an EA. In Indiana, the proposed relocation of
railroad lines in Knox County, Indiana and Lawrence County, IL will be
reduced in scope. In Massachusetts, the Berkley-Dighton Bridge over the
Taunton River, Bristol County project has been reduced in scope and now
meets the criteria for a CE. In New York, the Millennium Parkway
project in Chautauqua County has been reduced in scope and now meets
the criteria for a CE. In Pennsylvania, SR 56 in Johnstown has been
reduced in scope and now meets the criteria for a CE.
In addition, the FHWA Division Office, in consultation with the
State DOT, determined that two projects in Tennessee had changed
project limits and impacts therefore it was best to rescind the
original NOIs and issue new NOIs. The SR 374 project from SR 13 to SR
76 in Montgomery County, Tennessee will reissue an NOI. The North
Second Street Connector project in Shelby County issued a new NOI on
February 5, 2009.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rescinded
State Project name--location NOI date date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CA......................................... U.S. 395 Realignment--San 7/5/2006 10/30/2008
Bernardino County.
CA......................................... Interstate 5 (I-5) HOV Truck Lanes 5/10/2007 11/10/2008
SR14 and Parker Road Interchange--
Los Angeles County.
CO......................................... Northwest Corridor/Northwest 7/21/2003 7/1/2008
Parkway--Broomfield and Jefferson
Counties.
ID......................................... I 84 Karcher Interchange--Ada and 7/17/2007 7/17/2008
Canyon Counties.
IN......................................... Railroad Line Relocations--Knox 3/16/2007 11/25/2008
County, Indiana and Lawrence
County Illinois.
MA......................................... Berkley-Dighton Bridge over the 10/9/1985 6/19/2008
Taunton River--Bristol County.
MN......................................... TH 169--Mille Lacs and Crow Wing 7/17/2000 7/8/2009
Counties. 2/4/2002
MN......................................... Tier 1--TH 10--Sherburne County.... 7/28/2003 10/10/2008
MN......................................... TH 10--Otter Tail and Wadena 3/27/2003 10/10/2008
Counties.
MN......................................... TH 14--Olmstead County............. 10/7/2002 10/10/2008
MS......................................... Interstate Facility Connecting I-55 8/10/2007 10/1/2008
with I-20--Hinds and Madison
Counties.
MO......................................... Transportation System in Lawrence \(1)\ 1/23/2009
Christian and Green Counties.
NY......................................... Millennium Parkway Project 12/27/2007 3/3/2009
Chautauqua County.
OH......................................... Highway Improvement Project US-127 10/6/2000 6/30/2008
and SR-63/SR-4 Interchange--
Trenton, Butler County.
PA......................................... SR 56--Johnstown................... 7/14/2001 10/l/2008
TN......................................... State Route 374, State Route 13, 11/12/1996 12/24/2008
State Route 76--Montgomery County.
TN......................................... North Second Street Connector-- 11/2/2002 12/24/2008
Shelby County.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Unknown.
(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Number 20.205,
Highway Planning and Construction. The regulations implementing
Executive Order 12372 regarding intergovernmental consultation on
Federal programs and activities apply to this program.)
Issued on: May 14, 2009.
Jeffrey F. Paniati,
Acting Deputy Federal Highway Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-12526 Filed 5-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-22-P