Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology; Health Information Technology Extension Program, 25550-25552 [E9-12419]
Download as PDF
25550
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 101 / Thursday, May 28, 2009 / Notices
Operations, Office of the Chief Financial
Officer, General Services
Administration, 1800 F Street, NW.,
Washington DC, 20405.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURE:
Employees may obtain information
about whether they are a part of this
system of records from the system
manager at the above address.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
Requests from individuals for access
to their records should be addressed to
the system manager.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
GSA rules for access to systems of
records, contesting the contents of
systems of records, and appealing initial
determinations are published at 41 CFR
Part 105—64.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
The sources are individuals, other
employees, supervisors, other agencies,
management officials, and non-Federal
sources such as private firms.
[FR Doc. E9–12372 Filed 5–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820–34–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology; Health
Information Technology Extension
Program
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
draft description of the program for
establishing regional centers to assist
providers seeking to adopt and become
meaningful users of health information
technology, as required under Section
3012(c) of the Public Health Service Act,
as added by the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111–
5) (ARRA).
DATES: All comments on the draft Plan
should be received no later than 5 p.m.
on June 11, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Electronic responses are
preferred and should be addressed to
HealthIT-comments@hhs.gov. Written
comments may also be submitted and
should be addressed to the Office of the
National Coordinator for Health
Information Technology, 200
Independence Ave, SW., Suite 729D,
Washington, DC 20201, Attention:
Health IT Extension Program
Comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of the National Coordinator for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:11 May 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
Health, Information Technology, 200
Independence Ave, SW., Suite 729D,
Washington, DC 20201, Phone 202–690–
7151, E-mail: onc.request@hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111–
5) (ARRA) includes provisions to
promote the adoption of interoperable
health information technology to
promote meaningful use of health
information technology to improve the
quality and value of American health
care. These provisions are set forth in
Title XIII of Division A and Title IV of
Division B, which may together be cited
as the ‘‘Health Information Technology
for Economic and Clinical Health Act’’
or the ‘‘HITECH Act’’.
The ARRA appropriates a total of $2
billion in discretionary funding, in
addition to incentive payments under
the Medicare and Medicaid programs
for providers’ adoption and meaningful
use of certified electronic health record
technology.
Providers that seek to adopt and
effectively use health information
technology (health IT) face a complex
variety of tasks. Those tasks include
assessing needs, selecting and
negotiating with a system vendor or
reseller, and implementing workflow
changes to improve clinical
performance and, ultimately, outcomes.
Past experiences have shown that
without robust technical assistance,
many EHRs that are purchased are never
installed or are not used by some
providers.
Section 3012 of the Public Health
Service Act (PHSA), as added by the
HITECH Act, authorizes a Health
Information Technology Extension
Program to make assistance available to
all providers, but with priority given to
assisting specific types of providers. By
statute, the health information
technology extension program (or
‘‘Extension Program’’) consists of a
National Health Information Technology
Research Center (HITRC) and Regional
Extension Centers (or ‘‘regional
centers’’).
The major focus for the Centers’ work
with most of the providers that they
serve will be to help to select and
successfully implement certified
electronic health records (EHRs). While
those providers that have already
implemented a basic EHR may not
require implementation assistance, they
may require other technical assistance
to achieve ‘‘meaningful user’’ status. All
regional centers will assist adopters to
effectively meet or exceed the
requirements to be determined a
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
‘‘meaningful user’’ for purposes of
earning the incentives authorized under
Title IV of Division B. Lessons learned
in the support of providers, both before
and after their initial implementation of
the EHR, will be shared among the
regional centers and made publicly
available.
The HITECH Act prioritizes access to
health information technology for
uninsured, underinsured, historically
underserved and other special-needs
populations, and use of that technology
to achieve reduction in health
disparities. The Extension Program will
include provisions in both the HITRC
and regional centers awards to assure
that the program addresses the unique
needs of providers serving American
Indian and Alaska Native, non-Englishspeaking and other historically
underserved populations, as well as
those that serve patients with maternal,
child, long-term care, and behavioral
health needs.
II. Detailed Explanation and Goals of
the Program
The HITECH Act directs the Secretary
of Health and Human Services, through
the Office of the National Coordinator
for Health Information Technology
(ONC), to establish Health Information
Technology Regional Extension Centers
to provide technical assistance and
disseminate best practices and other
information learned from the Center to
support and accelerate efforts to adopt,
implement and effectively utilize health
information technology. In developing
and implementing this and other
programs pursuant to the HITECH Act,
ONC is consulting with other Federal
agencies with demonstrated experience
and expertise in information technology
services, such as the National Institute
of Standards and Technology.
We propose that the goals of the
regional center program should be to:
—Encourage adoption of electronic
health records by clinicians and
hospitals;
—Assist clinicians and hospitals to
become meaningful users of electronic
health records; and
—Increase the probability that adopters
of electronic health record systems
will become meaningful users of the
technology.
The HITECH Act states that ‘‘the
objective of the regional centers is to
enhance and promote the adoption of
health information technology
through—
(A) Assistance with the
implementation, effective use,
upgrading, and ongoing maintenance of
health information technology,
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 101 / Thursday, May 28, 2009 / Notices
including electronic health records, to
healthcare providers nationwide;
(B) broad participation of individuals
from industry, universities, and State
governments;
(C) active dissemination of best
practices and research on the
implementation, effective use,
upgrading, and ongoing maintenance of
health information technology,
including electronic health records, to
health care providers in order to
improve the quality of healthcare and
protect the privacy and security of
health information;
(D) participation, to the extent
practicable, in health information
exchanges;
(E) utilization, when appropriate, of
the expertise and capability that exists
in Federal agencies other than the
Department; and
(F) integration of health information
technology, including electronic health
records, into the initial and ongoing
training of health professionals and
others in the healthcare industry that
would be instrumental to improving the
quality of healthcare through the
smooth and accurate electronic use and
exchange of health information.’’
To achieve the centers’ statutory
objectives, we propose to establish
regional centers to offer to all providers
in a designated region access to
information and to some level of
assistance. The regional centers will
become, upon award, members of a
consortium that will be coordinated and
facilitated by the Health Information
Technology Research Center (HITRC)
that the Secretary is directed to establish
by Section 3012(b) of the PHSA as
added by the HITECH Act. Whereas
research and analysis of best practices
regarding health IT utilization rests
primarily with the HITRC,
dissemination and implementation of
those best practices learned from the
HITRC will rest with the regional
centers.
Per Section 3012(c)(4) of the PHSA as
added by the HITECH Act, each regional
center shall ‘‘aim to provide assistance
and education to all providers in a
region but shall prioritize any direct
assistance first to the following:
• Public or not-for-profit hospitals or
critical-access hospitals.
• Federally qualified health centers
(as defined in section 1861(aa)(4) of the
Social Security Act).
• Entities that are located in rural and
other areas that serve uninsured,
underinsured, and medically
underserved individuals (regardless of
whether such area is urban or rural).
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:11 May 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
• Individual or small group practices
(or a consortium thereof) that are
primarily focused on primary care.’’
Regional centers will therefore, as a
core purpose of their establishment,
furnish direct, individualized, and (as
needed) on-site assistance to individual
providers. This intensive assistance is,
per statute, to be prioritized to providers
identified in the statute. We expect that
on-site assistance will be a key service
offered by the regional centers to
providers prioritized by the statute for
direct assistance, and will represent a
significant portion of the regional
centers’ activities.
Because of the nationwide scope of
the Medicare and Medicaid payment
incentives for adoption and meaningful
use of certified EHRs, the Extension
Program should provide at least a
minimal level of technical assistance
across the nation. We propose that the
minimal level of support must include
the provision of unbiased information
on mechanisms to exchange health
information in compliance with
applicable statutory and regulatory
requirements, and information to
support the effective integration of
health information exchange activities
into practice workflow.
It is expected that each regional center
will provide technical assistance within
a defined geographic area, and that each
defined geographic area will be served
by only one center. At a minimum, the
support should consist of materials
designed to be widely and rapidly
disseminated, both for provider selfstudy and for use by entities other than
regional centers that have an interest
and the ability to provide some
assistance and information to providers
adopting health IT.
As required by Section 3012(c)(8) of
the Public Health Service Act as added
by the HITECH Act, all regional centers
will be evaluated to ensure they are
meeting the needs of the health
providers in their geographic area in a
manner consistent with specified
statutory objectives. All lessons learned
from these efforts will be exchanged
across regional centers, and with other
stakeholders, including but not limited
to other federal programs, to promote
the availability of highly effective
support to providers across the nation.
All regional centers will be expected to
use the lessons learned as important,
but not the only, information to guide
their internal self-evaluation and
ongoing improvement processes.
A. Criteria for Determining Qualified
Applicants
Section 3012(c)(2) of the PHSA as
added by the HITECH Act requires that:
PO 00000
Frm 00073
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25551
‘‘Regional centers shall be affiliated
with any United States-based nonprofit
organization, or group thereof, that
applies and is awarded financial
assistance under this section. Individual
awards shall be decided on the basis of
merit.’’ In addition, we propose the
following requirements and preference
criteria.
Required Criteria may include:
• Define the geographic region and
the provider population within that
region it proposes to serve.
• Describe proposed levels and
approaches of support for prioritized
and other providers to be served.
• Address how the applicant would
structure its organization and staffing to
enable providers served to have ready
access to reasonably local health IT
‘‘extension agents’’ and provide training
and on-going support for these critical
workers.
• Demonstrate the capacity to
facilitate and support cooperation
among local providers, health systems,
communities, and health information
exchanges.
• Demonstrate that the applicant is
able to meet the needs of providers
prioritized for direct assistance by
Section 3012(c)(4) of the PHSA as added
by the HITECH Act.
• Propose an efficient and feasible
strategy to furnish deep specialized
expertise (in such areas as
organizational development, legal
issues, privacy and security, economic
and financing issues, and evaluation)
broadly to all providers served and
intensive, individualized, ‘‘local’’
presence from an interdisciplinary
extension agent to smaller groups of
providers assigned to individual agents.
Preference Criteria may include:
• We propose to give preference to
proposed regional center organizational
plans and implementation strategies
incorporating multi-stakeholder
collaborations that leverage local
resources. The local stakeholders and
resources that applicants may wish to
consider including in some
combination, though not limited to, the
following: Public and/or private
universities with health professions,
informatics, and allied health programs;
state or regional medical/professional
societies and other provider
organizations; federally recognized state
primary care associations; state or
regional hospital organizations; large
health centers and networks of rural
and/or community health centers; other
relevant health professional
organizations; the regionally relevant
state Area Health Education Center(s);
health information exchange
organizations serving providers in the
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
25552
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 101 / Thursday, May 28, 2009 / Notices
region; the Medicare Quality
Improvement Organization(s)(QIO(s)
serving providers that the proposed
regional center aims to serve; state and
tribal government entities in the center’s
geographic service area including, but
not limited to, public health agencies;
libraries and information centers with
health professional and community
outreach programs; and consumer/
patient organizations.
• As noted below, we propose to give
preference to applicants identifying
viable sources of matching funds. Viable
sources could include grants from
states, non-profit foundations, and
payment for services from providers
able to make such payment. For
example, Medicaid providers could
choose to contract with a regional center
in lieu of a corporate vendor for
implementation and meaningful use
support services, for which costs are
reimbursable under Section 1903 of the
Social Security Act, as amended by the
HITECH Act. A regional center could
also, theoretically, seek to establish
itself as a first-choice source of
assistance that would realize net
retained earnings on service to nonprioritized providers and use those
retained earnings as a source of
matching funds for its grant-funded
activities.
B. Maximum Support Levels Expected
To Be Available to Centers Under the
Program
Given current national economic
conditions, we propose to exercise the
option in the HITECH Act to not require
matching funds for awards made in FY
2010. We will encourage use of
matching funds and the coordination of
existing resources to strengthen
proposals for regional centers and
potentially expand the number of
providers that can be assisted. Review
criteria may be established that give
preference to proposals including
matching funds but that do not
automatically preclude otherwise
technically meritorious proposals that
do not include matching funds.
We propose using ARRA funding for
two-year awards made in FY2010 and
furnishing providers in awardees’ areas
with robust support. While we expect
the actual ARRA funding awarded per
center will vary based on the number
and types of providers proposed to be
served, and the amount of matching
funds proposed by each regional center,
we anticipate an average award value on
the order of $1 million to $2 million per
center. The maximum award value we
anticipate making available to any one
regional center is $10 million. Funding
may also be approximately allocated to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:11 May 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
the regional centers in relative
proportion to the numbers of prioritized
direct assistance recipients identified in
the HITECH Act.
C. Procedures To Be Followed by the
Applicants
Timelines
This notice makes public and invites
comments on the draft description of
the regional centers program and is not
a solicitation of proposals to serve as
extension centers under this program.
The Federal Government will award
funding for the regional centers through
a solicitation of proposals, after
considering the comments obtained
through this notice. The availability of
this solicitation will be broadly
announced through appropriate and
familiar means, including publication in
the Federal Register of a Notice of the
solicitation’s availability. This
announcement of the solicitation will
provide further details on the finalized
requirements and application process
for regional centers, pursuant to and in
compliance with all applicable statutes
and regulations, including but not
limited to the Paperwork Reduction Act
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Applicants well prepared to provide
robust extension services will likely
need at least two months to provide
high quality proposals. It is expected,
however, that other potential applicants
will need more time to prepare
proposals.
We propose to make initial awards for
regional centers as early as the first
quarter of FY2010 and continuing
through the fourth quarter of FY2010.
Multiple, closely spaced proposal
submission dates will be established to
allow each geographic area to begin
receiving benefit of a regional center as
soon as possible. We believe this
approach is necessary to allow areas
with well prepared applicants to begin
work sooner, without excluding from
consideration those areas where the best
applicants require more time to convene
a multi-stakeholder collaboration to
develop a robust proposal that includes
a viable organizational plan and
implementation strategy. We solicit
comment on our phased approach to
proposal submission dates and issuance
of awards.
The target timeframe for awards is
intended to enable regional centers to
begin supporting provider adoption in
time for providers to receive incentive
payments with respect to Fiscal Year
(hospitals) or Calendar Year
(physicians) 2011 and 2012, when
potential Medicare incentives are
greatest.
PO 00000
Frm 00074
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
D. Comments on Draft Description
ONC requests comments on this draft
description of the regional centers
within the Extension Program. Please
send comments to the address, for
receipt by the due date, specified at the
beginning of this notice.
Dated: May 22, 2009.
Charles P. Friedman,
Deputy National Coordinator for Health
Information Technology.
[FR Doc. E9–12419 Filed 5–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150–45–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[60Day–0923–09BR]
Proposed Data Collections Submitted
for Public Comment and
Recommendations
In compliance with the requirement
of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 for
opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) will publish periodic
summaries of proposed projects. To
request more information on the
proposed projects or to obtain a copy of
the data collection plans and
instruments, call 404–639–5960 and
send comments to Maryam I. Daneshvar,
CDC Acting Reports Clearance Officer,
1600 Clifton Road, MS–D74, Atlanta,
GA 30333 or send an e-mail to
omb@cdc.gov.
Comments are invited on: (a) Whether
the proposed collection of information
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including through the
use of automated collection techniques
or other forms of information
technology. Written comments should
be received within 60 days of this
notice.
Proposed Project
Registration of individuals with
Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS) in
the National ALS Registry—New—
Agency for Toxic Substances and
Disease Registry (ATSDR), Coordinating
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 101 (Thursday, May 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25550-25552]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12419]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information
Technology; Health Information Technology Extension Program
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the draft description of the program for
establishing regional centers to assist providers seeking to adopt and
become meaningful users of health information technology, as required
under Section 3012(c) of the Public Health Service Act, as added by the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5) (ARRA).
DATES: All comments on the draft Plan should be received no later than
5 p.m. on June 11, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Electronic responses are preferred and should be addressed
to HealthIT-comments@hhs.gov. Written comments may also be submitted
and should be addressed to the Office of the National Coordinator for
Health Information Technology, 200 Independence Ave, SW., Suite 729D,
Washington, DC 20201, Attention: Health IT Extension Program Comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of the National Coordinator
for Health, Information Technology, 200 Independence Ave, SW., Suite
729D, Washington, DC 20201, Phone 202-690-7151, E-mail:
onc.request@hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Pub. L. 111-5)
(ARRA) includes provisions to promote the adoption of interoperable
health information technology to promote meaningful use of health
information technology to improve the quality and value of American
health care. These provisions are set forth in Title XIII of Division A
and Title IV of Division B, which may together be cited as the ``Health
Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act'' or the
``HITECH Act''.
The ARRA appropriates a total of $2 billion in discretionary
funding, in addition to incentive payments under the Medicare and
Medicaid programs for providers' adoption and meaningful use of
certified electronic health record technology.
Providers that seek to adopt and effectively use health information
technology (health IT) face a complex variety of tasks. Those tasks
include assessing needs, selecting and negotiating with a system vendor
or reseller, and implementing workflow changes to improve clinical
performance and, ultimately, outcomes. Past experiences have shown that
without robust technical assistance, many EHRs that are purchased are
never installed or are not used by some providers.
Section 3012 of the Public Health Service Act (PHSA), as added by
the HITECH Act, authorizes a Health Information Technology Extension
Program to make assistance available to all providers, but with
priority given to assisting specific types of providers. By statute,
the health information technology extension program (or ``Extension
Program'') consists of a National Health Information Technology
Research Center (HITRC) and Regional Extension Centers (or ``regional
centers'').
The major focus for the Centers' work with most of the providers
that they serve will be to help to select and successfully implement
certified electronic health records (EHRs). While those providers that
have already implemented a basic EHR may not require implementation
assistance, they may require other technical assistance to achieve
``meaningful user'' status. All regional centers will assist adopters
to effectively meet or exceed the requirements to be determined a
``meaningful user'' for purposes of earning the incentives authorized
under Title IV of Division B. Lessons learned in the support of
providers, both before and after their initial implementation of the
EHR, will be shared among the regional centers and made publicly
available.
The HITECH Act prioritizes access to health information technology
for uninsured, underinsured, historically underserved and other
special-needs populations, and use of that technology to achieve
reduction in health disparities. The Extension Program will include
provisions in both the HITRC and regional centers awards to assure that
the program addresses the unique needs of providers serving American
Indian and Alaska Native, non-English-speaking and other historically
underserved populations, as well as those that serve patients with
maternal, child, long-term care, and behavioral health needs.
II. Detailed Explanation and Goals of the Program
The HITECH Act directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services,
through the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information
Technology (ONC), to establish Health Information Technology Regional
Extension Centers to provide technical assistance and disseminate best
practices and other information learned from the Center to support and
accelerate efforts to adopt, implement and effectively utilize health
information technology. In developing and implementing this and other
programs pursuant to the HITECH Act, ONC is consulting with other
Federal agencies with demonstrated experience and expertise in
information technology services, such as the National Institute of
Standards and Technology.
We propose that the goals of the regional center program should be
to:
--Encourage adoption of electronic health records by clinicians and
hospitals;
--Assist clinicians and hospitals to become meaningful users of
electronic health records; and
--Increase the probability that adopters of electronic health record
systems will become meaningful users of the technology.
The HITECH Act states that ``the objective of the regional centers
is to enhance and promote the adoption of health information technology
through--
(A) Assistance with the implementation, effective use, upgrading,
and ongoing maintenance of health information technology,
[[Page 25551]]
including electronic health records, to healthcare providers
nationwide;
(B) broad participation of individuals from industry, universities,
and State governments;
(C) active dissemination of best practices and research on the
implementation, effective use, upgrading, and ongoing maintenance of
health information technology, including electronic health records, to
health care providers in order to improve the quality of healthcare and
protect the privacy and security of health information;
(D) participation, to the extent practicable, in health information
exchanges;
(E) utilization, when appropriate, of the expertise and capability
that exists in Federal agencies other than the Department; and
(F) integration of health information technology, including
electronic health records, into the initial and ongoing training of
health professionals and others in the healthcare industry that would
be instrumental to improving the quality of healthcare through the
smooth and accurate electronic use and exchange of health
information.''
To achieve the centers' statutory objectives, we propose to
establish regional centers to offer to all providers in a designated
region access to information and to some level of assistance. The
regional centers will become, upon award, members of a consortium that
will be coordinated and facilitated by the Health Information
Technology Research Center (HITRC) that the Secretary is directed to
establish by Section 3012(b) of the PHSA as added by the HITECH Act.
Whereas research and analysis of best practices regarding health IT
utilization rests primarily with the HITRC, dissemination and
implementation of those best practices learned from the HITRC will rest
with the regional centers.
Per Section 3012(c)(4) of the PHSA as added by the HITECH Act, each
regional center shall ``aim to provide assistance and education to all
providers in a region but shall prioritize any direct assistance first
to the following:
Public or not-for-profit hospitals or critical-access
hospitals.
Federally qualified health centers (as defined in section
1861(aa)(4) of the Social Security Act).
Entities that are located in rural and other areas that
serve uninsured, underinsured, and medically underserved individuals
(regardless of whether such area is urban or rural).
Individual or small group practices (or a consortium
thereof) that are primarily focused on primary care.''
Regional centers will therefore, as a core purpose of their
establishment, furnish direct, individualized, and (as needed) on-site
assistance to individual providers. This intensive assistance is, per
statute, to be prioritized to providers identified in the statute. We
expect that on-site assistance will be a key service offered by the
regional centers to providers prioritized by the statute for direct
assistance, and will represent a significant portion of the regional
centers' activities.
Because of the nationwide scope of the Medicare and Medicaid
payment incentives for adoption and meaningful use of certified EHRs,
the Extension Program should provide at least a minimal level of
technical assistance across the nation. We propose that the minimal
level of support must include the provision of unbiased information on
mechanisms to exchange health information in compliance with applicable
statutory and regulatory requirements, and information to support the
effective integration of health information exchange activities into
practice workflow.
It is expected that each regional center will provide technical
assistance within a defined geographic area, and that each defined
geographic area will be served by only one center. At a minimum, the
support should consist of materials designed to be widely and rapidly
disseminated, both for provider self-study and for use by entities
other than regional centers that have an interest and the ability to
provide some assistance and information to providers adopting health
IT.
As required by Section 3012(c)(8) of the Public Health Service Act
as added by the HITECH Act, all regional centers will be evaluated to
ensure they are meeting the needs of the health providers in their
geographic area in a manner consistent with specified statutory
objectives. All lessons learned from these efforts will be exchanged
across regional centers, and with other stakeholders, including but not
limited to other federal programs, to promote the availability of
highly effective support to providers across the nation. All regional
centers will be expected to use the lessons learned as important, but
not the only, information to guide their internal self-evaluation and
ongoing improvement processes.
A. Criteria for Determining Qualified Applicants
Section 3012(c)(2) of the PHSA as added by the HITECH Act requires
that: ``Regional centers shall be affiliated with any United States-
based nonprofit organization, or group thereof, that applies and is
awarded financial assistance under this section. Individual awards
shall be decided on the basis of merit.'' In addition, we propose the
following requirements and preference criteria.
Required Criteria may include:
Define the geographic region and the provider population
within that region it proposes to serve.
Describe proposed levels and approaches of support for
prioritized and other providers to be served.
Address how the applicant would structure its organization
and staffing to enable providers served to have ready access to
reasonably local health IT ``extension agents'' and provide training
and on-going support for these critical workers.
Demonstrate the capacity to facilitate and support
cooperation among local providers, health systems, communities, and
health information exchanges.
Demonstrate that the applicant is able to meet the needs
of providers prioritized for direct assistance by Section 3012(c)(4) of
the PHSA as added by the HITECH Act.
Propose an efficient and feasible strategy to furnish deep
specialized expertise (in such areas as organizational development,
legal issues, privacy and security, economic and financing issues, and
evaluation) broadly to all providers served and intensive,
individualized, ``local'' presence from an interdisciplinary extension
agent to smaller groups of providers assigned to individual agents.
Preference Criteria may include:
We propose to give preference to proposed regional center
organizational plans and implementation strategies incorporating multi-
stakeholder collaborations that leverage local resources. The local
stakeholders and resources that applicants may wish to consider
including in some combination, though not limited to, the following:
Public and/or private universities with health professions,
informatics, and allied health programs; state or regional medical/
professional societies and other provider organizations; federally
recognized state primary care associations; state or regional hospital
organizations; large health centers and networks of rural and/or
community health centers; other relevant health professional
organizations; the regionally relevant state Area Health Education
Center(s); health information exchange organizations serving providers
in the
[[Page 25552]]
region; the Medicare Quality Improvement Organization(s)(QIO(s) serving
providers that the proposed regional center aims to serve; state and
tribal government entities in the center's geographic service area
including, but not limited to, public health agencies; libraries and
information centers with health professional and community outreach
programs; and consumer/patient organizations.
As noted below, we propose to give preference to
applicants identifying viable sources of matching funds. Viable sources
could include grants from states, non-profit foundations, and payment
for services from providers able to make such payment. For example,
Medicaid providers could choose to contract with a regional center in
lieu of a corporate vendor for implementation and meaningful use
support services, for which costs are reimbursable under Section 1903
of the Social Security Act, as amended by the HITECH Act. A regional
center could also, theoretically, seek to establish itself as a first-
choice source of assistance that would realize net retained earnings on
service to non-prioritized providers and use those retained earnings as
a source of matching funds for its grant-funded activities.
B. Maximum Support Levels Expected To Be Available to Centers Under the
Program
Given current national economic conditions, we propose to exercise
the option in the HITECH Act to not require matching funds for awards
made in FY 2010. We will encourage use of matching funds and the
coordination of existing resources to strengthen proposals for regional
centers and potentially expand the number of providers that can be
assisted. Review criteria may be established that give preference to
proposals including matching funds but that do not automatically
preclude otherwise technically meritorious proposals that do not
include matching funds.
We propose using ARRA funding for two-year awards made in FY2010
and furnishing providers in awardees' areas with robust support. While
we expect the actual ARRA funding awarded per center will vary based on
the number and types of providers proposed to be served, and the amount
of matching funds proposed by each regional center, we anticipate an
average award value on the order of $1 million to $2 million per
center. The maximum award value we anticipate making available to any
one regional center is $10 million. Funding may also be approximately
allocated to the regional centers in relative proportion to the numbers
of prioritized direct assistance recipients identified in the HITECH
Act.
C. Procedures To Be Followed by the Applicants
Timelines
This notice makes public and invites comments on the draft
description of the regional centers program and is not a solicitation
of proposals to serve as extension centers under this program. The
Federal Government will award funding for the regional centers through
a solicitation of proposals, after considering the comments obtained
through this notice. The availability of this solicitation will be
broadly announced through appropriate and familiar means, including
publication in the Federal Register of a Notice of the solicitation's
availability. This announcement of the solicitation will provide
further details on the finalized requirements and application process
for regional centers, pursuant to and in compliance with all applicable
statutes and regulations, including but not limited to the Paperwork
Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
Applicants well prepared to provide robust extension services will
likely need at least two months to provide high quality proposals. It
is expected, however, that other potential applicants will need more
time to prepare proposals.
We propose to make initial awards for regional centers as early as
the first quarter of FY2010 and continuing through the fourth quarter
of FY2010. Multiple, closely spaced proposal submission dates will be
established to allow each geographic area to begin receiving benefit of
a regional center as soon as possible. We believe this approach is
necessary to allow areas with well prepared applicants to begin work
sooner, without excluding from consideration those areas where the best
applicants require more time to convene a multi-stakeholder
collaboration to develop a robust proposal that includes a viable
organizational plan and implementation strategy. We solicit comment on
our phased approach to proposal submission dates and issuance of
awards.
The target timeframe for awards is intended to enable regional
centers to begin supporting provider adoption in time for providers to
receive incentive payments with respect to Fiscal Year (hospitals) or
Calendar Year (physicians) 2011 and 2012, when potential Medicare
incentives are greatest.
D. Comments on Draft Description
ONC requests comments on this draft description of the regional
centers within the Extension Program. Please send comments to the
address, for receipt by the due date, specified at the beginning of
this notice.
Dated: May 22, 2009.
Charles P. Friedman,
Deputy National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.
[FR Doc. E9-12419 Filed 5-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-45-P