Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Importer's Entry Notice, 25554-25556 [E9-12317]
Download as PDF
25554
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 101 / Thursday, May 28, 2009 / Notices
is necessary for the proper performance
of the functions of the agency, including
whether the information shall have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of the burden of the
proposed collection of information; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on respondents, including the use of
automated collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Written comments should be received
within 60 days of this notice.
Proposed Project
National Health Interview Survey
(NHIS), (OMB No. 0920–0214)—
Revision—National Center for Health
Statistics (NCHS), Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
Section 306 of the Public Health
Service (PHS) Act (42 U.S.C. 242k), as
amended, authorizes that the Secretary
of Health and Human Services (DHHS),
acting through NCHS, shall collect
statistics on the extent and nature of
illness and disability of the population
of the United States.
The annual National Health Interview
Survey is a major source of general
statistics on the health of the U.S.
population and has been in the field
continuously since 1957. Clearance is
sought for three years, to collect data for
2010, 2011, and 2012. This voluntary
household-based survey collects
demographic and health-related
information on a nationally
representative sample of persons and
households throughout the country.
Information is collected using computer
assisted personal interviews (CAPI). A
core set of data is collected each year
while sponsored supplements vary from
year to year. For 2010, supplement
information will be collected on cancer,
occupational injury, epilepsy, and child
mental health. The child mental health
component includes a follow-up study
to assess the validity of a short series of
questions for measuring mental distress
in children.
In accordance with the 1995 initiative
to increase the integration of surveys
within the Department of Health and
Human Services, respondents to the
NHIS serve as the sampling frame for
the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
conducted by the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality. The NHIS has
long been used by government,
university, and private researchers to
evaluate both general health and
specific issues, such as cancer, diabetes,
and access to health care. It is a leading
source of data for the Congressionallymandated ‘‘Health US’’ and related
publications, as well as the single most
important source of statistics to track
progress toward the National Health
Promotion and Disease Prevention
Objectives, ‘‘Healthy People 2010.’’
There is no cost to the respondents
other than their time.
ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE
Average
burden per
response
in hours
Number of
responses per
respondent
Questionnaire
(respondent)
Number of
respondents
Screener Questionnaire (adult family member) ...............................................
Family Core (adult family member) .................................................................
Adult Core (sample adult) ................................................................................
Child Core (adult family member) ....................................................................
Adult Cancer (sample adult) ............................................................................
Child Cancer (adult family member) ................................................................
Adult Occupational Injury (sample adult) .........................................................
Adult Epilepsy (sample adult) ..........................................................................
Child Mental Health (adult family member) .....................................................
Child Mental Health Follow-Up (parent) ..........................................................
Child Mental Health Follow-Up (child) .............................................................
Re-interview Survey) .......................................................................................
10,000
33,000
25,000
10,000
25,000
10,000
25,000
25,000
10,000
430
319
........................
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
5/60
23/60
17/60
9/60
19/60
1/60
2/60
1/60
2/60
40/60
28/60
5/60
833
12,650
7,083
1,500
7,917
167
833
417
333
287
149
250
Total Burden Hours ..................................................................................
........................
........................
........................
32,419
Maryam I. Daneshvar,
Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Office of
the Chief Science Officer, Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. E9–12393 Filed 5–27–09; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
(OMB) for review and clearance under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
Food and Drug Administration
DATES: Fax written comments on the
collection of information by June 29,
2009.
[Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0050]
BILLING CODE 4163–18–P
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission for Office of
Management and Budget Review;
Comment Request; Importer’s Entry
Notice
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION:
Notice.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is announcing
that a proposed collection of
information has been submitted to the
Office of Management and Budget
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:11 May 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
Total burden
in hours
PO 00000
Frm 00076
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on
the information collection are received,
OMB recommends that written
comments be faxed to the Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX:
202–395–6974, or e-mailed to
oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the
OMB control number 0910–0046. Also
include the FDA docket number found
in brackets in the heading of this
document.
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 101 / Thursday, May 28, 2009 / Notices
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management (HFA–710),
Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857,
301–796–3792.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In
compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA
has submitted the following proposed
collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Importer’s Entry Notice (OMB Control
Number 0910–0046)—Extension
In order to make an admissibility
decision for each entry, FDA needs four
additional pieces of information that are
not available in the U.S. Customs and
Border Protection’s (CBP’s) dataset.
These data elements are the FDA
Product Code, FDA country of
production, FDA manufacturer/shipper,
and ultimate consignee. It is the
‘‘automated’’ collection of these four
data elements for which OMB approval
is requested. FDA construes this request
as an extension of the prior approval of
collection of this data via a different
media, i.e., paper. There are additional
data elements which filers can provide
to FDA along with other entry-related
information which, by doing so, may
result in their receiving an FDA
admissibility decision more
expeditiously, e.g., the quantity, value,
and Affirmation(s) of Compliance with
Qualifier(s).
At each U.S. port of entry (seaport,
landport, and airport) where foreignorigin FDA-regulated products are
offered for import, FDA is notified,
through CBP’s Automated Commercial
System (ACS) by the importer (or his
agent) of the arrival of each entry.
Following such notification, FDA
reviews relevant data to ensure the
imported product meets the standards
as are required for domestic products,
makes an admissibility decision, and
informs the importer and CBP of its
decision. A single entry frequently
contains multiple lines of different
products. FDA may authorize specific
lines to enter the United States
unimpeded, while others in the same
entry are to be held pending further
FDA review/action.
An important feature developed and
programmed into FDA’s automated
system is that all entry data passes
through a screening criteria program.
FDA’s electronic screening criteria
module makes the initial screening
decision on every entry of foreign-origin
FDA-regulated product. Virtually
instantaneously after the entry is filed,
the filer receives FDA’s admissibility
decision covering each entry, i.e., ‘‘MAY
PROCEED’’ or ‘‘FDA REVIEW.’’
Examples of FDA’s need to further
review an entry include: Products
originating from a specific country or
manufacturer known to have a history of
problems, FDA has no previous
knowledge of the foreign manufacturer
and/or product, or an import alert
covering the product has been issued,
etc. The system assists FDA entry
reviewers by notifying them of
information, such as the issuance of
import alerts, thus averting the chance
that such information will be missed.
With the inception of the interface
with CBP’s ACS, FDA’s electronic
screening criteria program is applied
nationwide. This virtually eliminates
problems such as ‘‘port shopping,’’ e.g.,
attempts to intentionally slip products
through one FDA port when refused by
another, or to file entries at a port
known to receive a high volume of
entries. Every electronically submitted
entry line of foreign-origin FDAregulated product undergoes automated
screening described previously. The
screening criteria can be set to be as
specific or as broad as applicable;
changes are virtually immediately
effective. This capability is of
tremendous value in protecting the
public in the event there is a need to
immediately halt a specific product
from entering the United States.
25555
In the Federal Register of February
25, 2009 (74 FR 8549), FDA published
a 60-day notice requesting comments on
the information collection requirements
for FDA regulated products. Two
comments were received.
One comment was submitted by the
American Association of Exporters and
Importers. General comments expressed
support for the automation of the data
elements sought by FDA. A second
comment encouraged FDA to pursue
risk management methodologies which
will reduce FDA’s dependence on
transaction data for admissibility
decisions. The comments encouraged
FDA to develop risk management
methodologies using account
management techniques assessing the
internal controls of foreign
manufacturers and U.S. importers will
provide FDA with better insight into
admissibility decisions before entry of
the merchandise.
FDA agrees that risk management
methodologies are key to effective and
efficient oversight of FDA regulated
commodities. However, different
commodities may have different risk
factors and being able to identify the
commodity, where it was manufactured,
and who shipped the commodity are
essential for FDA to determine the risk
factors that should be applied when the
product is offered for entry. These data
elements are key for FDA in order to
apply the appropriate risk strategy.
A second comment was submitted by
Organon Schering-Plough. No specific
comments were provided about the
collection of the additional FDA data
elements. The submission suggested
that FDA develop a process similar to
the ‘‘binding ruling’’ process that is
maintained by CBP because of the
impact on the filers compliance-score
rating. However, the development of a
‘‘binding ruling’’ process is outside the
scope of this announcement.
FDA estimates the burden of this
collection of information as follows:
TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1
Annual Frequency
per Response
Number of Respondents
3,727
1 There
Total Annual
Responses
1,070
Hours per
Response
3,988,371
.263
are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:11 May 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00077
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
Total Hours
28MYN1
1,048,447
25556
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 101 / Thursday, May 28, 2009 / Notices
Dated: May 20, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E9–12317 Filed 5–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
[30Day–09–08AW]
Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork
Reduction Act Review
The Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of
information collection requests under
review by the Office of Management and
Budget (OMB) in compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
Chapter 35). To request a copy of these
requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance
Officer at (404) 639–5960 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written
comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of
Management and Budget, Washington,
DC or by fax to (202) 395–6974. Written
comments should be received within 30
days of this notice.
Proposed Project
Quarantine Station Illness Response
Forms: Airline, Maritime, and Land/
Border Crossing—Existing Collection in
Use without an OMB Number—National
Center for Preparedness, Detection, and
Control of Infectious Diseases
(NCPDCID), Centers for Disease Control
and Prevention (CDC).
Background and Brief Description
CDC proposes to collect patient-level
clinical, epidemiologic, and
demographic data from ill travelers and
their possible contacts in order to fulfill
its regulatory responsibility to prevent
the importation of communicable
diseases from foreign countries (42 CFR
Part 71) and interstate control of
communicable diseases in humans (42
CFR Part 70).
Section 361 of the Public Health
Service (PHS) Act (42 U.S.C. 264)
authorizes the Secretary of Health and
Human Services to make and enforce
regulations necessary to prevent the
introduction, transmission or spread of
communicable diseases from foreign
countries into the United States. The
regulations that implement this law, 42
CFR Parts 70 and 71, authorize
quarantine officers and other personnel
to inspect and undertake necessary
control measures with respect to
conveyances (e.g., airplanes, cruise
ships, trucks, etc.), persons, and
shipments of animals and etiologic
agents in order to protect the public
health. The regulations also require
conveyances to immediately report an
‘‘ill person’’ or any death on board to
the Quarantine Station prior to arrival in
the United States. An ‘‘ill person’’ is
defined in statute by:
— Fever (≥100° F or 38° C) persisting
≥48 hours.
— Fever (≥100° F or 38° C) and rash,
glandular swelling, or jaundice.
— Diarrhea (≥3 stools in 24 hours or
greater than normal amount).
The Severe Acute Respiratory
Syndrome (SARS) situation and concern
about pandemic influenza and other
communicable diseases have prompted
CDC Quarantine Stations to recommend
that all illnesses be reported prior to
arrival.
CDC Quarantine Stations are currently
located at 20 international U.S. Ports of
Entry. When a suspected illness is
reported to the Quarantine Station,
officers promptly respond to this report
by meeting the incoming conveyance
(when possible), collecting information
and evaluating the patient(s), and
determining whether an ill person can
safely be admitted into the U.S. If
Quarantine Station staff is unable to
meet the conveyance, the crew or
medical staff of the conveyance is
trained to complete the required
documentation and forward it (using a
secure system) to the Quarantine Station
for review and follow-up.
To perform these tasks in a
streamlined manner and ensure that all
relevant information is collected in the
most efficient and timely manner
possible, Quarantine Stations use a
number of forms—the Airline Screening
and Illness Response Form, the Ship
Illness/Death Reporting Form, and the
Land/Border Crossing Form—to collect
data on passengers with suspected
illness and other travelers/crew who
may have been exposed to an illness.
These forms are also used to respond to
a report of a death aboard a conveyance.
The purpose of all of the forms is the
same: to collect information that helps
quarantine officials detect and respond
to potential public health
communicable disease threats. All forms
collect the following categories of
information: demographics and mode of
transportation, clinical and medical
history, and any other relevant facts
(e.g., travel history, traveling
companions, etc.). As part of this
documentation, quarantine public
health officers look for specific signs
and symptoms common to the nine
quarantinable diseases (Pandemic
influenza; SARS; Cholera; Plague;
Diphtheria; Infectious Tuberculosis;
Smallpox; Yellow fever; and Viral
Hemorrhagic Fevers), as well as most
communicable diseases in general.
These signs and symptoms include
fever, difficulty breathing, shortness of
breath, cough, diarrhea, jaundice, or
signs of a neurological infection. The
forms also collect data specific to the
traveler’s conveyance.
These data are used by Quarantine
Stations to make decisions about a
passenger’s suspected illness as well as
its communicability. This in turn
enables Quarantine Station staff to assist
conveyances in the public health
management of passengers and crew.
The estimated total burden on the
public, included in the chart below, can
vary a great deal depending on the
severity of the illness being reported,
the number of contacts, the number of
follow-up inquiries required, and who is
recording the information (e.g.,
Quarantine Station staff versus the
conveyance medical authority). In all
cases, Quarantine Stations have
implemented practices and procedures
that balance the health and safety of the
American public against the public’s
desire for minimal interference with
their travel and trade. Whenever
possible, Quarantine Station staff obtain
information from other documentation
(e.g., manifest order, other airline
documents) to reduce the amount of the
public burden.
There is no cost to respondents other
than their time to complete the survey.
The estimated annual burden for this
data collection is 172 hours.
ESTIMATE OF ANNUALIZED BURDEN
Number of
respondents
Respondents
Form
Quarantine Staff / Crew or Medical Staff .......
Airline Illness or Death Investigation Form ....
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:11 May 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00078
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
Number of
responses per
respondent
1320
28MYN1
1
Average
burden per
response
(in hours)
6/60
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 101 (Thursday, May 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25554-25556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12317]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0050]
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Importer's Entry
Notice
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.
DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by June
29, 2009.
ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer,
FAX: 202-395-6974, or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0046.
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of
this document.
[[Page 25555]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of
Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3792.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for
review and clearance.
Importer's Entry Notice (OMB Control Number 0910-0046)--Extension
In order to make an admissibility decision for each entry, FDA
needs four additional pieces of information that are not available in
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's (CBP's) dataset. These data
elements are the FDA Product Code, FDA country of production, FDA
manufacturer/shipper, and ultimate consignee. It is the ``automated''
collection of these four data elements for which OMB approval is
requested. FDA construes this request as an extension of the prior
approval of collection of this data via a different media, i.e., paper.
There are additional data elements which filers can provide to FDA
along with other entry-related information which, by doing so, may
result in their receiving an FDA admissibility decision more
expeditiously, e.g., the quantity, value, and Affirmation(s) of
Compliance with Qualifier(s).
At each U.S. port of entry (seaport, landport, and airport) where
foreign-origin FDA-regulated products are offered for import, FDA is
notified, through CBP's Automated Commercial System (ACS) by the
importer (or his agent) of the arrival of each entry. Following such
notification, FDA reviews relevant data to ensure the imported product
meets the standards as are required for domestic products, makes an
admissibility decision, and informs the importer and CBP of its
decision. A single entry frequently contains multiple lines of
different products. FDA may authorize specific lines to enter the
United States unimpeded, while others in the same entry are to be held
pending further FDA review/action.
An important feature developed and programmed into FDA's automated
system is that all entry data passes through a screening criteria
program. FDA's electronic screening criteria module makes the initial
screening decision on every entry of foreign-origin FDA-regulated
product. Virtually instantaneously after the entry is filed, the filer
receives FDA's admissibility decision covering each entry, i.e., ``MAY
PROCEED'' or ``FDA REVIEW.''
Examples of FDA's need to further review an entry include: Products
originating from a specific country or manufacturer known to have a
history of problems, FDA has no previous knowledge of the foreign
manufacturer and/or product, or an import alert covering the product
has been issued, etc. The system assists FDA entry reviewers by
notifying them of information, such as the issuance of import alerts,
thus averting the chance that such information will be missed.
With the inception of the interface with CBP's ACS, FDA's
electronic screening criteria program is applied nationwide. This
virtually eliminates problems such as ``port shopping,'' e.g., attempts
to intentionally slip products through one FDA port when refused by
another, or to file entries at a port known to receive a high volume of
entries. Every electronically submitted entry line of foreign-origin
FDA-regulated product undergoes automated screening described
previously. The screening criteria can be set to be as specific or as
broad as applicable; changes are virtually immediately effective. This
capability is of tremendous value in protecting the public in the event
there is a need to immediately halt a specific product from entering
the United States.
In the Federal Register of February 25, 2009 (74 FR 8549), FDA
published a 60-day notice requesting comments on the information
collection requirements for FDA regulated products. Two comments were
received.
One comment was submitted by the American Association of Exporters
and Importers. General comments expressed support for the automation of
the data elements sought by FDA. A second comment encouraged FDA to
pursue risk management methodologies which will reduce FDA's dependence
on transaction data for admissibility decisions. The comments
encouraged FDA to develop risk management methodologies using account
management techniques assessing the internal controls of foreign
manufacturers and U.S. importers will provide FDA with better insight
into admissibility decisions before entry of the merchandise.
FDA agrees that risk management methodologies are key to effective
and efficient oversight of FDA regulated commodities. However,
different commodities may have different risk factors and being able to
identify the commodity, where it was manufactured, and who shipped the
commodity are essential for FDA to determine the risk factors that
should be applied when the product is offered for entry. These data
elements are key for FDA in order to apply the appropriate risk
strategy.
A second comment was submitted by Organon Schering-Plough. No
specific comments were provided about the collection of the additional
FDA data elements. The submission suggested that FDA develop a process
similar to the ``binding ruling'' process that is maintained by CBP
because of the impact on the filers compliance-score rating. However,
the development of a ``binding ruling'' process is outside the scope of
this announcement.
FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as
follows:
Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Annual Frequency per
Number of Respondents Response Total Annual Responses Hours per Response Total Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3,727 1,070 3,988,371 .263 1,048,447
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.
[[Page 25556]]
Dated: May 20, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.>
[FR Doc. E9-12317 Filed 5-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S