Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Importer's Entry Notice, 25554-25556 [E9-12317]

Download as PDF 25554 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 101 / Thursday, May 28, 2009 / Notices is necessary for the proper performance of the functions of the agency, including whether the information shall have practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the burden of the proposed collection of information; (c) ways to enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and (d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on respondents, including the use of automated collection techniques or other forms of information technology. Written comments should be received within 60 days of this notice. Proposed Project National Health Interview Survey (NHIS), (OMB No. 0920–0214)— Revision—National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description Section 306 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act (42 U.S.C. 242k), as amended, authorizes that the Secretary of Health and Human Services (DHHS), acting through NCHS, shall collect statistics on the extent and nature of illness and disability of the population of the United States. The annual National Health Interview Survey is a major source of general statistics on the health of the U.S. population and has been in the field continuously since 1957. Clearance is sought for three years, to collect data for 2010, 2011, and 2012. This voluntary household-based survey collects demographic and health-related information on a nationally representative sample of persons and households throughout the country. Information is collected using computer assisted personal interviews (CAPI). A core set of data is collected each year while sponsored supplements vary from year to year. For 2010, supplement information will be collected on cancer, occupational injury, epilepsy, and child mental health. The child mental health component includes a follow-up study to assess the validity of a short series of questions for measuring mental distress in children. In accordance with the 1995 initiative to increase the integration of surveys within the Department of Health and Human Services, respondents to the NHIS serve as the sampling frame for the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey conducted by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The NHIS has long been used by government, university, and private researchers to evaluate both general health and specific issues, such as cancer, diabetes, and access to health care. It is a leading source of data for the Congressionallymandated ‘‘Health US’’ and related publications, as well as the single most important source of statistics to track progress toward the National Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Objectives, ‘‘Healthy People 2010.’’ There is no cost to the respondents other than their time. ANNUALIZED BURDEN TABLE Average burden per response in hours Number of responses per respondent Questionnaire (respondent) Number of respondents Screener Questionnaire (adult family member) ............................................... Family Core (adult family member) ................................................................. Adult Core (sample adult) ................................................................................ Child Core (adult family member) .................................................................... Adult Cancer (sample adult) ............................................................................ Child Cancer (adult family member) ................................................................ Adult Occupational Injury (sample adult) ......................................................... Adult Epilepsy (sample adult) .......................................................................... Child Mental Health (adult family member) ..................................................... Child Mental Health Follow-Up (parent) .......................................................... Child Mental Health Follow-Up (child) ............................................................. Re-interview Survey) ....................................................................................... 10,000 33,000 25,000 10,000 25,000 10,000 25,000 25,000 10,000 430 319 ........................ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5/60 23/60 17/60 9/60 19/60 1/60 2/60 1/60 2/60 40/60 28/60 5/60 833 12,650 7,083 1,500 7,917 167 833 417 333 287 149 250 Total Burden Hours .................................................................................. ........................ ........................ ........................ 32,419 Maryam I. Daneshvar, Acting Reports Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief Science Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [FR Doc. E9–12393 Filed 5–27–09; 8:45 am] DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES (OMB) for review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. Food and Drug Administration DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by June 29, 2009. [Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0050] BILLING CODE 4163–18–P Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Importer’s Entry Notice AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. ACTION: Notice. SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of Management and Budget VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:11 May 27, 2009 Jkt 217001 Total burden in hours PO 00000 Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ADDRESSES: To ensure that comments on the information collection are received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, FAX: 202–395–6974, or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910–0046. Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of this document. E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM 28MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 101 / Thursday, May 28, 2009 / Notices FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of Information Management (HFA–710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301–796–3792. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for review and clearance. Importer’s Entry Notice (OMB Control Number 0910–0046)—Extension In order to make an admissibility decision for each entry, FDA needs four additional pieces of information that are not available in the U.S. Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP’s) dataset. These data elements are the FDA Product Code, FDA country of production, FDA manufacturer/shipper, and ultimate consignee. It is the ‘‘automated’’ collection of these four data elements for which OMB approval is requested. FDA construes this request as an extension of the prior approval of collection of this data via a different media, i.e., paper. There are additional data elements which filers can provide to FDA along with other entry-related information which, by doing so, may result in their receiving an FDA admissibility decision more expeditiously, e.g., the quantity, value, and Affirmation(s) of Compliance with Qualifier(s). At each U.S. port of entry (seaport, landport, and airport) where foreignorigin FDA-regulated products are offered for import, FDA is notified, through CBP’s Automated Commercial System (ACS) by the importer (or his agent) of the arrival of each entry. Following such notification, FDA reviews relevant data to ensure the imported product meets the standards as are required for domestic products, makes an admissibility decision, and informs the importer and CBP of its decision. A single entry frequently contains multiple lines of different products. FDA may authorize specific lines to enter the United States unimpeded, while others in the same entry are to be held pending further FDA review/action. An important feature developed and programmed into FDA’s automated system is that all entry data passes through a screening criteria program. FDA’s electronic screening criteria module makes the initial screening decision on every entry of foreign-origin FDA-regulated product. Virtually instantaneously after the entry is filed, the filer receives FDA’s admissibility decision covering each entry, i.e., ‘‘MAY PROCEED’’ or ‘‘FDA REVIEW.’’ Examples of FDA’s need to further review an entry include: Products originating from a specific country or manufacturer known to have a history of problems, FDA has no previous knowledge of the foreign manufacturer and/or product, or an import alert covering the product has been issued, etc. The system assists FDA entry reviewers by notifying them of information, such as the issuance of import alerts, thus averting the chance that such information will be missed. With the inception of the interface with CBP’s ACS, FDA’s electronic screening criteria program is applied nationwide. This virtually eliminates problems such as ‘‘port shopping,’’ e.g., attempts to intentionally slip products through one FDA port when refused by another, or to file entries at a port known to receive a high volume of entries. Every electronically submitted entry line of foreign-origin FDAregulated product undergoes automated screening described previously. The screening criteria can be set to be as specific or as broad as applicable; changes are virtually immediately effective. This capability is of tremendous value in protecting the public in the event there is a need to immediately halt a specific product from entering the United States. 25555 In the Federal Register of February 25, 2009 (74 FR 8549), FDA published a 60-day notice requesting comments on the information collection requirements for FDA regulated products. Two comments were received. One comment was submitted by the American Association of Exporters and Importers. General comments expressed support for the automation of the data elements sought by FDA. A second comment encouraged FDA to pursue risk management methodologies which will reduce FDA’s dependence on transaction data for admissibility decisions. The comments encouraged FDA to develop risk management methodologies using account management techniques assessing the internal controls of foreign manufacturers and U.S. importers will provide FDA with better insight into admissibility decisions before entry of the merchandise. FDA agrees that risk management methodologies are key to effective and efficient oversight of FDA regulated commodities. However, different commodities may have different risk factors and being able to identify the commodity, where it was manufactured, and who shipped the commodity are essential for FDA to determine the risk factors that should be applied when the product is offered for entry. These data elements are key for FDA in order to apply the appropriate risk strategy. A second comment was submitted by Organon Schering-Plough. No specific comments were provided about the collection of the additional FDA data elements. The submission suggested that FDA develop a process similar to the ‘‘binding ruling’’ process that is maintained by CBP because of the impact on the filers compliance-score rating. However, the development of a ‘‘binding ruling’’ process is outside the scope of this announcement. FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as follows: TABLE 1—ESTIMATED ANNUAL REPORTING BURDEN1 Annual Frequency per Response Number of Respondents 3,727 1 There Total Annual Responses 1,070 Hours per Response 3,988,371 .263 are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information. VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:11 May 27, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM Total Hours 28MYN1 1,048,447 25556 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 101 / Thursday, May 28, 2009 / Notices Dated: May 20, 2009. Jeffrey Shuren, Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning. [FR Doc. E9–12317 Filed 5–27–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [30Day–09–08AW] Agency Forms Undergoing Paperwork Reduction Act Review The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) publishes a list of information collection requests under review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35). To request a copy of these requests, call the CDC Reports Clearance Officer at (404) 639–5960 or send an email to omb@cdc.gov. Send written comments to CDC Desk Officer, Office of Management and Budget, Washington, DC or by fax to (202) 395–6974. Written comments should be received within 30 days of this notice. Proposed Project Quarantine Station Illness Response Forms: Airline, Maritime, and Land/ Border Crossing—Existing Collection in Use without an OMB Number—National Center for Preparedness, Detection, and Control of Infectious Diseases (NCPDCID), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Background and Brief Description CDC proposes to collect patient-level clinical, epidemiologic, and demographic data from ill travelers and their possible contacts in order to fulfill its regulatory responsibility to prevent the importation of communicable diseases from foreign countries (42 CFR Part 71) and interstate control of communicable diseases in humans (42 CFR Part 70). Section 361 of the Public Health Service (PHS) Act (42 U.S.C. 264) authorizes the Secretary of Health and Human Services to make and enforce regulations necessary to prevent the introduction, transmission or spread of communicable diseases from foreign countries into the United States. The regulations that implement this law, 42 CFR Parts 70 and 71, authorize quarantine officers and other personnel to inspect and undertake necessary control measures with respect to conveyances (e.g., airplanes, cruise ships, trucks, etc.), persons, and shipments of animals and etiologic agents in order to protect the public health. The regulations also require conveyances to immediately report an ‘‘ill person’’ or any death on board to the Quarantine Station prior to arrival in the United States. An ‘‘ill person’’ is defined in statute by: — Fever (≥100° F or 38° C) persisting ≥48 hours. — Fever (≥100° F or 38° C) and rash, glandular swelling, or jaundice. — Diarrhea (≥3 stools in 24 hours or greater than normal amount). The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) situation and concern about pandemic influenza and other communicable diseases have prompted CDC Quarantine Stations to recommend that all illnesses be reported prior to arrival. CDC Quarantine Stations are currently located at 20 international U.S. Ports of Entry. When a suspected illness is reported to the Quarantine Station, officers promptly respond to this report by meeting the incoming conveyance (when possible), collecting information and evaluating the patient(s), and determining whether an ill person can safely be admitted into the U.S. If Quarantine Station staff is unable to meet the conveyance, the crew or medical staff of the conveyance is trained to complete the required documentation and forward it (using a secure system) to the Quarantine Station for review and follow-up. To perform these tasks in a streamlined manner and ensure that all relevant information is collected in the most efficient and timely manner possible, Quarantine Stations use a number of forms—the Airline Screening and Illness Response Form, the Ship Illness/Death Reporting Form, and the Land/Border Crossing Form—to collect data on passengers with suspected illness and other travelers/crew who may have been exposed to an illness. These forms are also used to respond to a report of a death aboard a conveyance. The purpose of all of the forms is the same: to collect information that helps quarantine officials detect and respond to potential public health communicable disease threats. All forms collect the following categories of information: demographics and mode of transportation, clinical and medical history, and any other relevant facts (e.g., travel history, traveling companions, etc.). As part of this documentation, quarantine public health officers look for specific signs and symptoms common to the nine quarantinable diseases (Pandemic influenza; SARS; Cholera; Plague; Diphtheria; Infectious Tuberculosis; Smallpox; Yellow fever; and Viral Hemorrhagic Fevers), as well as most communicable diseases in general. These signs and symptoms include fever, difficulty breathing, shortness of breath, cough, diarrhea, jaundice, or signs of a neurological infection. The forms also collect data specific to the traveler’s conveyance. These data are used by Quarantine Stations to make decisions about a passenger’s suspected illness as well as its communicability. This in turn enables Quarantine Station staff to assist conveyances in the public health management of passengers and crew. The estimated total burden on the public, included in the chart below, can vary a great deal depending on the severity of the illness being reported, the number of contacts, the number of follow-up inquiries required, and who is recording the information (e.g., Quarantine Station staff versus the conveyance medical authority). In all cases, Quarantine Stations have implemented practices and procedures that balance the health and safety of the American public against the public’s desire for minimal interference with their travel and trade. Whenever possible, Quarantine Station staff obtain information from other documentation (e.g., manifest order, other airline documents) to reduce the amount of the public burden. There is no cost to respondents other than their time to complete the survey. The estimated annual burden for this data collection is 172 hours. ESTIMATE OF ANNUALIZED BURDEN Number of respondents Respondents Form Quarantine Staff / Crew or Medical Staff ....... Airline Illness or Death Investigation Form .... VerDate Nov<24>2008 17:11 May 27, 2009 Jkt 217001 PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM Number of responses per respondent 1320 28MYN1 1 Average burden per response (in hours) 6/60

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 101 (Thursday, May 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25554-25556]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12317]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Food and Drug Administration

[Docket No. FDA-2009-N-0050]


Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office 
of Management and Budget Review; Comment Request; Importer's Entry 
Notice

AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing that a 
proposed collection of information has been submitted to the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) for review and clearance under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995.

DATES: Fax written comments on the collection of information by June 
29, 2009.

ADDRESSES:  To ensure that comments on the information collection are 
received, OMB recommends that written comments be faxed to the Office 
of Information and Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attn: FDA Desk Officer, 
FAX: 202-395-6974, or e-mailed to oira_submission@omb.eop.gov. All 
comments should be identified with the OMB control number 0910-0046. 
Also include the FDA docket number found in brackets in the heading of 
this document.

[[Page 25555]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Elizabeth Berbakos, Office of 
Information Management (HFA-710), Food and Drug Administration, 5600 
Fishers Lane, Rockville, MD 20857, 301-796-3792.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In compliance with 44 U.S.C. 3507, FDA has 
submitted the following proposed collection of information to OMB for 
review and clearance.

Importer's Entry Notice (OMB Control Number 0910-0046)--Extension

    In order to make an admissibility decision for each entry, FDA 
needs four additional pieces of information that are not available in 
the U.S. Customs and Border Protection's (CBP's) dataset. These data 
elements are the FDA Product Code, FDA country of production, FDA 
manufacturer/shipper, and ultimate consignee. It is the ``automated'' 
collection of these four data elements for which OMB approval is 
requested. FDA construes this request as an extension of the prior 
approval of collection of this data via a different media, i.e., paper. 
There are additional data elements which filers can provide to FDA 
along with other entry-related information which, by doing so, may 
result in their receiving an FDA admissibility decision more 
expeditiously, e.g., the quantity, value, and Affirmation(s) of 
Compliance with Qualifier(s).
    At each U.S. port of entry (seaport, landport, and airport) where 
foreign-origin FDA-regulated products are offered for import, FDA is 
notified, through CBP's Automated Commercial System (ACS) by the 
importer (or his agent) of the arrival of each entry. Following such 
notification, FDA reviews relevant data to ensure the imported product 
meets the standards as are required for domestic products, makes an 
admissibility decision, and informs the importer and CBP of its 
decision. A single entry frequently contains multiple lines of 
different products. FDA may authorize specific lines to enter the 
United States unimpeded, while others in the same entry are to be held 
pending further FDA review/action.
    An important feature developed and programmed into FDA's automated 
system is that all entry data passes through a screening criteria 
program. FDA's electronic screening criteria module makes the initial 
screening decision on every entry of foreign-origin FDA-regulated 
product. Virtually instantaneously after the entry is filed, the filer 
receives FDA's admissibility decision covering each entry, i.e., ``MAY 
PROCEED'' or ``FDA REVIEW.''
    Examples of FDA's need to further review an entry include: Products 
originating from a specific country or manufacturer known to have a 
history of problems, FDA has no previous knowledge of the foreign 
manufacturer and/or product, or an import alert covering the product 
has been issued, etc. The system assists FDA entry reviewers by 
notifying them of information, such as the issuance of import alerts, 
thus averting the chance that such information will be missed.
    With the inception of the interface with CBP's ACS, FDA's 
electronic screening criteria program is applied nationwide. This 
virtually eliminates problems such as ``port shopping,'' e.g., attempts 
to intentionally slip products through one FDA port when refused by 
another, or to file entries at a port known to receive a high volume of 
entries. Every electronically submitted entry line of foreign-origin 
FDA-regulated product undergoes automated screening described 
previously. The screening criteria can be set to be as specific or as 
broad as applicable; changes are virtually immediately effective. This 
capability is of tremendous value in protecting the public in the event 
there is a need to immediately halt a specific product from entering 
the United States.
    In the Federal Register of February 25, 2009 (74 FR 8549), FDA 
published a 60-day notice requesting comments on the information 
collection requirements for FDA regulated products. Two comments were 
received.
    One comment was submitted by the American Association of Exporters 
and Importers. General comments expressed support for the automation of 
the data elements sought by FDA. A second comment encouraged FDA to 
pursue risk management methodologies which will reduce FDA's dependence 
on transaction data for admissibility decisions. The comments 
encouraged FDA to develop risk management methodologies using account 
management techniques assessing the internal controls of foreign 
manufacturers and U.S. importers will provide FDA with better insight 
into admissibility decisions before entry of the merchandise.
    FDA agrees that risk management methodologies are key to effective 
and efficient oversight of FDA regulated commodities. However, 
different commodities may have different risk factors and being able to 
identify the commodity, where it was manufactured, and who shipped the 
commodity are essential for FDA to determine the risk factors that 
should be applied when the product is offered for entry. These data 
elements are key for FDA in order to apply the appropriate risk 
strategy.
    A second comment was submitted by Organon Schering-Plough. No 
specific comments were provided about the collection of the additional 
FDA data elements. The submission suggested that FDA develop a process 
similar to the ``binding ruling'' process that is maintained by CBP 
because of the impact on the filers compliance-score rating. However, 
the development of a ``binding ruling'' process is outside the scope of 
this announcement.
    FDA estimates the burden of this collection of information as 
follows:

                                                      Table 1--Estimated Annual Reporting Burden\1\
 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             Annual Frequency  per
                   Number of Respondents                            Response         Total Annual  Responses   Hours per  Response       Total Hours
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3,727                                                                         1,070                3,988,371                  .263             1,048,447
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ There are no capital costs or operating and maintenance costs associated with this collection of information.



[[Page 25556]]

    Dated: May 20, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.>
[FR Doc. E9-12317 Filed 5-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.