Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest; Evanston-Mountain View Ranger District; Utah; Blacks Fork Salvage Project, 25483-25485 [E9-12124]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 101 / Thursday, May 28, 2009 / Notices
Scoring criteria
8. Extent to which the work plan
clearly articulates a well
thought out approach to accomplishing objectives; and
clearly defines who will be
served by the study.
9. Extent to which the evaluation
methods are specific to the
program, clearly defined,
measurable, with expected
project outcomes.
10. Type of technical assistance
applicant is providing.
11. Project duration ....................
Points
Up to 40.
Up to 20.
Up to 20.
Up to 5.
VI. Award Administration Information
A. RUS will rank all qualifying
applications by their final score.
Applications will be selected for
funding, based on the highest scores and
the availability of funding for the Water
Resource Studies grants. Each applicant
will be notified in writing of the score
its application receives.
B. In making its decision about your
application, RUS may determine that
your application is:
1. Eligible and selected for funding;
2. Eligible but offered fewer funds than
requested;
3. Eligible but not selected for funding;
or
4. Ineligible for the grant.
C. In accordance with 7 CFR part
1900, subpart B, you generally have the
right to appeal adverse decisions. Some
adverse decisions cannot be appealed.
For example, if you are denied RUS
funding due to a lack of funds available
for the grant program, this decision
cannot be appealed. However, you may
make a request to the National Appeals
Division (NAD) to review the accuracy
of our finding that the decision cannot
be appealed. The appeal must be in
writing and filed at the appropriate
Regional Office, which can be found at
https://www.nad.usda.gov/offices.htm or
by calling (703) 305–1166.
D. Applicants selected for funding
will complete a grant agreement, which
outlines the terms and conditions of the
grant award.
E. Grantees will be reimbursed as
follows:
1. SF–270, ‘‘Request for Advance or
Reimbursement,’’ will be completed by
the grantee and submitted to either the
State or National Office not more
frequently than monthly.
2. Upon receipt of a properly
completed SF–270, payment will
ordinarily be made within 30 days.
3. Grantees are encouraged to use
women- and minority-owned banks (a
bank which is owned at least 50 percent
by women or minority group members)
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:11 May 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
for the deposit and disbursement of
funds.
F. Any change in the scope of the
project, budget adjustments of more
than 10 percent of the total budget, or
any other significant change in the
project must be reported to and
approved by the approval official by
written amendment to RUS Guide 1775–
1 (Grant Agreement). Any change not
approved may be cause for termination
of the grant.
G. Project reporting.
1. Grantees shall constantly monitor
performance to ensure that time
schedules are being met, projected work
by time periods is being accomplished,
and other performance objectives are
being achieved.
2. SF–269, ‘‘Financial Status Report
(short form),’’ and a project performance
activity report will be required of all
grantees on a quarterly basis, due 30
days after the end of each quarter.
3. A final project performance report
will be required with the last SF–269
due 90 days after the end of the last
quarter in which the project is
completed. The final report may serve
as the last quarterly report.
4. All multi-State grantees are to
submit an original of each report to the
National Office. Grantees serving only
one State are to submit an original of
each report to the State Office. The
project performance reports should
detail, preferably in a narrative format,
activities that have transpired for the
specific time period.
H. The grantee will provide an audit
report or financial statements as follows:
1. Grantees expending $500,000 or
more Federal funds per fiscal year will
submit an audit conducted in
accordance with OMB Circular A–133.
The audit will be submitted within 9
months after the grantee’s fiscal year.
Additional audits may be required if the
project period covers more than one
fiscal year.
2. Grantees expending less than
$500,000 will provide annual financial
statements covering the grant period,
consisting of the Grantee’s statement of
income and expense and balance sheet
signed by an appropriate official of the
Grantee. Financial statements will be
submitted within 90 days after the
grantee’s fiscal year.
VII. Agency Contacts
A. Web site: https://www.usda.gov/rus/
water. The RUS’ Web site maintains upto-date resources and contact
information for Technical Assistance
and Training Grants program.
B. Phone: 202–720–9586.
C. Fax: 202–690–0649.
D. E-mail: anita.obrien@wdc.usda.gov.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25483
E. Main point of contact: Anita
O’Brien, Loan Specialist, Water and
Environmental Programs, Water
Programs Division, Rural Utilities
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture.
Dated: May 1, 2009.
James R Newby,
Acting Administrator, Rural Utilities Service.
[FR Doc. E9–12344 Filed 5–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest;
Evanston-Mountain View Ranger
District; Utah; Blacks Fork Salvage
Project
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Evanston-Mountain View
Ranger District of the Uinta-WasatchCache National Forest proposes to treat
about 3,000 acres of a variety of
vegetation types within the 39,800 acre
Blacks Fork project area, located in
Summit County, Utah approximately 20
miles southeast of Evanston, Wyoming.
Proposed treatments include timber
harvest, prescribed fire, and mechanical
thinning. This proposal is being
developed in direct response to the
continuing mountain pine beetle
epidemic in the area and its potential
long-term impacts on the Blacks Fork
area.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope
of the analysis must be received by June
24, 2009. The draft environmental
impact statement is expected November
2009 and the final environmental
impact statement is expected March
2010.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to:
Blacks Fork Salvage Project, Attn:
Stephen Ryberg, P.O. Box 1880,
Evanston, WY 82931. Comments can
also be hand delivered Monday through
Friday 8 to 4:30 at the following
address: 1565 Highway 150 suite A
located in Evanston, Wyoming. In
addition, comments can be submitted
electronically to: comments-intermtnwasatch-cache-evanstonmtnview@fs.fed.us or submitted via
facsimile to 307–789–8639.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such a way that they are useful to the
Agency’s preparation of the EIS.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
25484
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 101 / Thursday, May 28, 2009 / Notices
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions. The submission of timely
and specific comments can affect a
reviewer’s ability to participate in
subsequent administrative review or
judicial review.
Comments received in response to
this solicitation, including names and
addresses of those who comment, will
be part of the public record for this
proposed action. Comments submitted
anonymously will be accepted and
considered; however, anonymous
comments will not provide the
respondent with standing to participate
in subsequent administrative review or
judicial review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Stephen Ryberg, District Ranger or Amy
Barker, Environmental Coordinator at
307–789–3194.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The primary purpose of this project is
to salvage dead lodgepole pine.
Associated with this site is the removal
of mistletoe infested trees within the
treatment units which will prevent
infection onto the lodgepole pine that
will regenerate in the salvaged
openings. The need for action now is
due to the ongoing mountain pine beetle
epidemic and resulting mortality. Trees
rapidly lose value as sawtimber once
they are dead and begin to dry and
decay. Salvaging dead conifers will
provide commercial timber that
contributes to a sustainable level of
goods and services within area
communities. The Wasatch-Cache
Revised Forest Plan (2003) directs the
use of timber harvest where allowed, to
contribute to the economy while
achieving properly functioning
conditions of vegetation and
watersheds.
A second purpose of this project is to
provide wildlife habitat improvements
to aspen, willow, and lodgepole habitat
components. There is concern about the
loss of aspen to conifer encroachment
adjacent to riparian areas, wetlands, and
beaver ponds. Stimulating aspen
regeneration via salvage harvest and/or
prescribed fire will improve beaver
habitat, riparian hardwood health, and
wetland hydrologic functions. There is
a need to treat willow to increase vigor
and age class diversity to improve
wildlife browse. Salvaged lodgepole
pine units will regenerate evenly to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:11 May 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
create large and dense lodgepole pine
stands for future goshawk habitat.
A third purpose of this project is to
reduce overall fuel loadings in treated
stands. This reduction in fuel loading
within treated stands is expected to
result in a more patchy mosaic of burn
conditions (compared to large expanses
of heavy fuels across the landscape) for
future wildfires, producing a more
resilient landscape. Defensible space/
fuel breaks created around or on the
upwind side of the developed sites at
the Lyman Lake Youth Camp, access
road, and campground will alter local
fire behavior and help alleviate
concerns regarding protection of
structures and visitors in the event of a
wildfire. Salvaging lodgepole pine in
the units adjacent to these
developments and treating the resulting
slash will further modify large fire
behavior in this general vicinity.
Proposed Action
The proposed project includes
treatment over approximately 3,000
acres of aspen, mixed aspen/lodgepole,
and willow communities using timber
harvest, prescribed fire, and mechanical
fuels treatments.
Timber salvage harvest would be used
over approximately 1,880 acres of the
lodgepole pine and mixed lodgepole
pine/aspen. Salvage of the dead and
removal of the beetle infested and/or
dwarf mistletoe infected trees would
result in treatments with essentially all
but the snags removed. Snags would be
left in clumps and islands to keep them
wind firm and intact. Regeneration of
lodgepole pine and/or aspen can be
expected within the treatment units.
Approximately 560 acres (primarily
aspen-conifer communities) of the 1,880
salvage acres described previously
would also be treated with prescribed
fire in a mosaic pattern following the
timber harvest. This will help stimulate
aspen regeneration by causing at least
60% mortality in the aspen overstory.
Slash from the logging operations would
create a fuel bed sufficient to carry the
fire.
Approximately 980 acres of the mixed
aspen and conifer type would be
burned, in a mosaic pattern to stimulate
aspen and mixed aspen/lodgepole
regeneration in patches. Approximately
40% to 80% of these acres would be
burned with sufficient intensity to
create these patches. A focus in this is
to burn areas near old beaver ponds to
recreate favorable habitat conditions
and restore hydrologic function in these
areas.
Approximately 90 acres of willow,
along the river’s edge would be treated
with fire to create openings and patches
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
for young willows to become
established.
Approximately 50 acres near Lyman
Lake campground and youth camp will
be treated by thinning, hand felling, and
piling of ladder fuels and dead wood to
create defensible space/fuelbreaks. This
is likely to be mostly small, noncommercial material, but there may be
some commercial size trees treated as
well (such as larger trees overhanging
buildings).
The Blacks Fork project area has a
fairly extensive road system in place
and most of the general treatment areas
are accessible. However, approximately
12.0 miles of temporary roads may be
constructed to access specific treatment
units. Of the 12.0 miles, about 3.0 miles
are old logging roads (2 track) that are
not considered system roads. While
these are considered new construction,
analysis should recognize that the prism
is in place and construction thus will
result in less soil disturbance. Following
treatments, all temporary roads would
be obliterated, the road prism returned
to contour, and the surface revegetated.
Surface roughening and slash will be
used on the obliterated sections to
reduce erosion potential while
vegetation becomes established.
Approximately 1.1 miles of FS Road
#80064 that is currently open to four
wheel drive traffic would be improved
to accommodate salvage logging traffic.
Approximately 1.2 miles of the Brush
Creek Road (#8 1657) would be also
used. Approximately 3.0 miles of the
Horse Creek Road (#885 13) and 0.7
miles of Road #84090 would also be
improved and used.
The Brush Creek portion of the
analysis area contains mixed National
Forest System land and private land
ownership. Access to this area has been
via an old decaying wood bridge which
was overlaid with a newer railcar bridge
in 2001. The Brush Creek road was built
by private parties roughly 40 years ago
to access their lands south of the West
Fork Blacks Fork, however, they
constructed the bridge and portions of
their access road on National Forest
System lands. While the area is
currently accessable using the railcar
bridge, this type of bridge is not an
engineered structure and thus cannot be
certified by Forest Service engineers as
safe for travel. Until it is replaced with
a permanent engineer rated bridge,
proper easements cannot be executed
between the private landowner and the
Forest Service to provide legal access to
the area. The current location of the
bridge abutments constrain water flow
in the West Fork Blacks Fork channel
resulting in downstream erosion of the
south bank. These abutments are rotting
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 101 / Thursday, May 28, 2009 / Notices
and the original wooden bridge stringers
and deck are beginning to fall into the
stream channel. Constructing the bridge
so the structure does not impede water
flow, particularily during periods of
high water, will be beneficial to the
aquatic habitats. As part of the proposed
action the West Fork Blacks Fork bridge
will be replaced to provide access to
salvage the lodgepole pine stands in
Section 18, which are heavily infested
by mountain pine beetles. Over the long
term, it would provide access for the
private property owner while allowing
fire access, and other types of
administrative uses on the National
Forest by the Forest Service. This road
has been gated for many years and this
would continue if the bridge were
replaced. The road would be
periodically maintained to prevent
erosion and deterioration of the road
prism. The execution of easements
would establish legal access and also
provide for future maintenance.
There are five basic techniques that
will be used to contain prescribed fire
in the treatment units. Fire will be used
alone or in conjunction with
commercial timber harvest to achieve a
mosaic of burned and unburned patches
within some of the units. Specific
methods of line control will be specified
in the burn plan. Construction of line
will use the minimum necessary
disturbance. The following estimates of
miles of each kind of fire line are
approximate, but represent the upper
end (most line construction) for control
lines. It is likely that firing techniques
will be utilized more and constructed
lines less than the estimates given.
At least 3.9 miles of unit perimeter
will utilize terrain features in
conjunction with the firing patterns to
selectively burn portions of the units.
Natural features such as rock outcrops,
openings, and wet riparian/stream
corridors, will serve as anchors for
utilizing firing techniques. In particular,
Blacks Fork will function as the west
fireline for most of the eastern burn
unit. Created features such as areas
where timber has been harvested may
also be appropriate for control lines,
depending on fuel conditions.
Up to about 0.3 miles of handline
(averaging 24 to 36 inches wide and
cleared to mineral soil) will be built and
rehabilitated. Where vegetation is short
and light, such as in sage and grass,
fireline constructed by hand will be
used to anchor the burning. Line will be
appropriately rehabilitated (by
mulching, seeding, and/or water
barring, as needed) following
completion of the burning to prevent
erosion.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:11 May 27, 2009
Jkt 217001
Approximately 1.0 miles of machine
line could be used. Heavy equipment
will be used to construct fireline where
fuels are larger than feasible for
handline, and natural features/firing
techniques are not adequate for control.
Line will average 72 to 96 inches in
width and be cleared to mineral soil.
Possible equipment includes (but is not
limited to) bulldozers, rubber tired
skidders, trail cats, and tracked
excavators. Following burning, the lines
will be rehabilitated (seeded and water
barred as needed, and where available
woody debris may be scattered along for
microsite protection).
Approximately 0.9 miles of skid trails
(including incidental machine line) will
be used as fire containment lines. In
timber sale units that have burning as
secondary treatments skid trails for log
removal will be placed along the
perimeter and used also for containment
of the fire. Skid trails are generally
about 96 inches in width and have
mineral soil exposed throughout much
of their surface. As in the machine line,
these will be rehabilitated following
burning to prevent erosion. In small
portions where it is not feasible to skid
along the boundary then machine line
will be built.
Approximately 4.1 miles of Forest
System Road will be used for fire
containment. Where existing roads
coincide with burn unit boundaries
these will be used as fire lines, such as
along the eastern boundary of the
eastern burn unit.
Possible Alternatives
In addition to the Proposed Action, a
no action alternative will be considered.
This alternative would simply continue
current management without the actions
of this proposal. Other alternatives may
be developed in response to issues
generated during the scoping process.
Responsible Official
Evanston-Mountain View District
Ranger.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is whether or
not to implement vegetation treatments
in the Blacks Fork project area, and if
so, to what degree and where.
Preliminary Issues
Preliminary issues are the effects of
treatments on wildlife habitat, and the
effects of insect and disease outbreaks
on current forest health.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process, which guides the
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
25485
development of the environmental
impact statement.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such manner that they are useful to the
agency’s preparation of the
environmental impact statement.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions. The submission of timely
and specific comments can affect a
reviewer’s ability to participate in
subsequent administrative appeal or
judicial review.
Dated: May 19, 2009.
Stephen M. Ryberg,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. E9–12124 Filed 5–27–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Rural Utilities Service
Dairyland Power Cooperative, Inc.:
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement and
Hold Public Scoping Meetings
Rural Utilities Service, USDA.
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement and
Hold Public Scoping Meetings.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Rural Utilities Service
(RUS) intends to prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement (EIS)
and hold public scoping meetings and
in connection with possible impacts
related to a project proposed by
Dairyland Power Cooperative in the
CapX 2020 Hampton-Rochester-La
Crosse Transmission Line Project. The
proposal consists of the construction of
a 345-kilovolt (kV) transmission line
and associated infrastructure between
Hampton, Minnesota and the La Crosse
area in Wisconsin. The project also
includes construction of new 161-kV
transmission lines and associated
facilities in the area of Rochester,
Minnesota. The total length of 345-kV
and 161-kV transmission lines
associated with the proposed project
will be approximately 150 miles.
Proposed and alternate transmission
segments and locations for proposed
and alternate associated facilities have
been identified by Dairyland Power
Cooperative. Dairyland Power
Cooperative is requesting RUS to
provide financing for its portion of the
proposed project.
DATES: RUS will conduct six public
scoping meetings in an open-house
format followed by a discussion period:
E:\FR\FM\28MYN1.SGM
28MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 101 (Thursday, May 28, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 25483-25485]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12124]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest; Evanston-Mountain View
Ranger District; Utah; Blacks Fork Salvage Project
AGENCY: Forest Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of intent to prepare an environmental impact statement.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Evanston-Mountain View Ranger District of the Uinta-
Wasatch-Cache National Forest proposes to treat about 3,000 acres of a
variety of vegetation types within the 39,800 acre Blacks Fork project
area, located in Summit County, Utah approximately 20 miles southeast
of Evanston, Wyoming. Proposed treatments include timber harvest,
prescribed fire, and mechanical thinning. This proposal is being
developed in direct response to the continuing mountain pine beetle
epidemic in the area and its potential long-term impacts on the Blacks
Fork area.
DATES: Comments concerning the scope of the analysis must be received
by June 24, 2009. The draft environmental impact statement is expected
November 2009 and the final environmental impact statement is expected
March 2010.
ADDRESSES: Send written comments to: Blacks Fork Salvage Project, Attn:
Stephen Ryberg, P.O. Box 1880, Evanston, WY 82931. Comments can also be
hand delivered Monday through Friday 8 to 4:30 at the following
address: 1565 Highway 150 suite A located in Evanston, Wyoming. In
addition, comments can be submitted electronically to: comments-intermtn-wasatch-cache-evanston-mtnview@fs.fed.us or submitted via
facsimile to 307-789-8639.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such a way that they are useful to the Agency's preparation of
the EIS. Therefore, comments should be provided prior to the close of
the comment period and should clearly
[[Page 25484]]
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions. The submission of
timely and specific comments can affect a reviewer's ability to
participate in subsequent administrative review or judicial review.
Comments received in response to this solicitation, including names
and addresses of those who comment, will be part of the public record
for this proposed action. Comments submitted anonymously will be
accepted and considered; however, anonymous comments will not provide
the respondent with standing to participate in subsequent
administrative review or judicial review.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Stephen Ryberg, District Ranger or Amy
Barker, Environmental Coordinator at 307-789-3194.
Individuals who use telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD)
may call the Federal Information Relay Service (FIRS) at 1-800-877-8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose and Need for Action
The primary purpose of this project is to salvage dead lodgepole
pine. Associated with this site is the removal of mistletoe infested
trees within the treatment units which will prevent infection onto the
lodgepole pine that will regenerate in the salvaged openings. The need
for action now is due to the ongoing mountain pine beetle epidemic and
resulting mortality. Trees rapidly lose value as sawtimber once they
are dead and begin to dry and decay. Salvaging dead conifers will
provide commercial timber that contributes to a sustainable level of
goods and services within area communities. The Wasatch-Cache Revised
Forest Plan (2003) directs the use of timber harvest where allowed, to
contribute to the economy while achieving properly functioning
conditions of vegetation and watersheds.
A second purpose of this project is to provide wildlife habitat
improvements to aspen, willow, and lodgepole habitat components. There
is concern about the loss of aspen to conifer encroachment adjacent to
riparian areas, wetlands, and beaver ponds. Stimulating aspen
regeneration via salvage harvest and/or prescribed fire will improve
beaver habitat, riparian hardwood health, and wetland hydrologic
functions. There is a need to treat willow to increase vigor and age
class diversity to improve wildlife browse. Salvaged lodgepole pine
units will regenerate evenly to create large and dense lodgepole pine
stands for future goshawk habitat.
A third purpose of this project is to reduce overall fuel loadings
in treated stands. This reduction in fuel loading within treated stands
is expected to result in a more patchy mosaic of burn conditions
(compared to large expanses of heavy fuels across the landscape) for
future wildfires, producing a more resilient landscape. Defensible
space/fuel breaks created around or on the upwind side of the developed
sites at the Lyman Lake Youth Camp, access road, and campground will
alter local fire behavior and help alleviate concerns regarding
protection of structures and visitors in the event of a wildfire.
Salvaging lodgepole pine in the units adjacent to these developments
and treating the resulting slash will further modify large fire
behavior in this general vicinity.
Proposed Action
The proposed project includes treatment over approximately 3,000
acres of aspen, mixed aspen/lodgepole, and willow communities using
timber harvest, prescribed fire, and mechanical fuels treatments.
Timber salvage harvest would be used over approximately 1,880 acres
of the lodgepole pine and mixed lodgepole pine/aspen. Salvage of the
dead and removal of the beetle infested and/or dwarf mistletoe infected
trees would result in treatments with essentially all but the snags
removed. Snags would be left in clumps and islands to keep them wind
firm and intact. Regeneration of lodgepole pine and/or aspen can be
expected within the treatment units.
Approximately 560 acres (primarily aspen-conifer communities) of
the 1,880 salvage acres described previously would also be treated with
prescribed fire in a mosaic pattern following the timber harvest. This
will help stimulate aspen regeneration by causing at least 60%
mortality in the aspen overstory. Slash from the logging operations
would create a fuel bed sufficient to carry the fire.
Approximately 980 acres of the mixed aspen and conifer type would
be burned, in a mosaic pattern to stimulate aspen and mixed aspen/
lodgepole regeneration in patches. Approximately 40% to 80% of these
acres would be burned with sufficient intensity to create these
patches. A focus in this is to burn areas near old beaver ponds to
recreate favorable habitat conditions and restore hydrologic function
in these areas.
Approximately 90 acres of willow, along the river's edge would be
treated with fire to create openings and patches for young willows to
become established.
Approximately 50 acres near Lyman Lake campground and youth camp
will be treated by thinning, hand felling, and piling of ladder fuels
and dead wood to create defensible space/fuelbreaks. This is likely to
be mostly small, non-commercial material, but there may be some
commercial size trees treated as well (such as larger trees overhanging
buildings).
The Blacks Fork project area has a fairly extensive road system in
place and most of the general treatment areas are accessible. However,
approximately 12.0 miles of temporary roads may be constructed to
access specific treatment units. Of the 12.0 miles, about 3.0 miles are
old logging roads (2 track) that are not considered system roads. While
these are considered new construction, analysis should recognize that
the prism is in place and construction thus will result in less soil
disturbance. Following treatments, all temporary roads would be
obliterated, the road prism returned to contour, and the surface
revegetated. Surface roughening and slash will be used on the
obliterated sections to reduce erosion potential while vegetation
becomes established.
Approximately 1.1 miles of FS Road 80064 that is currently
open to four wheel drive traffic would be improved to accommodate
salvage logging traffic. Approximately 1.2 miles of the Brush Creek
Road (8 1657) would be also used. Approximately 3.0 miles of
the Horse Creek Road (885 13) and 0.7 miles of Road
84090 would also be improved and used.
The Brush Creek portion of the analysis area contains mixed
National Forest System land and private land ownership. Access to this
area has been via an old decaying wood bridge which was overlaid with a
newer railcar bridge in 2001. The Brush Creek road was built by private
parties roughly 40 years ago to access their lands south of the West
Fork Blacks Fork, however, they constructed the bridge and portions of
their access road on National Forest System lands. While the area is
currently accessable using the railcar bridge, this type of bridge is
not an engineered structure and thus cannot be certified by Forest
Service engineers as safe for travel. Until it is replaced with a
permanent engineer rated bridge, proper easements cannot be executed
between the private landowner and the Forest Service to provide legal
access to the area. The current location of the bridge abutments
constrain water flow in the West Fork Blacks Fork channel resulting in
downstream erosion of the south bank. These abutments are rotting
[[Page 25485]]
and the original wooden bridge stringers and deck are beginning to fall
into the stream channel. Constructing the bridge so the structure does
not impede water flow, particularily during periods of high water, will
be beneficial to the aquatic habitats. As part of the proposed action
the West Fork Blacks Fork bridge will be replaced to provide access to
salvage the lodgepole pine stands in Section 18, which are heavily
infested by mountain pine beetles. Over the long term, it would provide
access for the private property owner while allowing fire access, and
other types of administrative uses on the National Forest by the Forest
Service. This road has been gated for many years and this would
continue if the bridge were replaced. The road would be periodically
maintained to prevent erosion and deterioration of the road prism. The
execution of easements would establish legal access and also provide
for future maintenance.
There are five basic techniques that will be used to contain
prescribed fire in the treatment units. Fire will be used alone or in
conjunction with commercial timber harvest to achieve a mosaic of
burned and unburned patches within some of the units. Specific methods
of line control will be specified in the burn plan. Construction of
line will use the minimum necessary disturbance. The following
estimates of miles of each kind of fire line are approximate, but
represent the upper end (most line construction) for control lines. It
is likely that firing techniques will be utilized more and constructed
lines less than the estimates given.
At least 3.9 miles of unit perimeter will utilize terrain features
in conjunction with the firing patterns to selectively burn portions of
the units. Natural features such as rock outcrops, openings, and wet
riparian/stream corridors, will serve as anchors for utilizing firing
techniques. In particular, Blacks Fork will function as the west
fireline for most of the eastern burn unit. Created features such as
areas where timber has been harvested may also be appropriate for
control lines, depending on fuel conditions.
Up to about 0.3 miles of handline (averaging 24 to 36 inches wide
and cleared to mineral soil) will be built and rehabilitated. Where
vegetation is short and light, such as in sage and grass, fireline
constructed by hand will be used to anchor the burning. Line will be
appropriately rehabilitated (by mulching, seeding, and/or water
barring, as needed) following completion of the burning to prevent
erosion.
Approximately 1.0 miles of machine line could be used. Heavy
equipment will be used to construct fireline where fuels are larger
than feasible for handline, and natural features/firing techniques are
not adequate for control. Line will average 72 to 96 inches in width
and be cleared to mineral soil. Possible equipment includes (but is not
limited to) bulldozers, rubber tired skidders, trail cats, and tracked
excavators. Following burning, the lines will be rehabilitated (seeded
and water barred as needed, and where available woody debris may be
scattered along for microsite protection).
Approximately 0.9 miles of skid trails (including incidental
machine line) will be used as fire containment lines. In timber sale
units that have burning as secondary treatments skid trails for log
removal will be placed along the perimeter and used also for
containment of the fire. Skid trails are generally about 96 inches in
width and have mineral soil exposed throughout much of their surface.
As in the machine line, these will be rehabilitated following burning
to prevent erosion. In small portions where it is not feasible to skid
along the boundary then machine line will be built.
Approximately 4.1 miles of Forest System Road will be used for fire
containment. Where existing roads coincide with burn unit boundaries
these will be used as fire lines, such as along the eastern boundary of
the eastern burn unit.
Possible Alternatives
In addition to the Proposed Action, a no action alternative will be
considered. This alternative would simply continue current management
without the actions of this proposal. Other alternatives may be
developed in response to issues generated during the scoping process.
Responsible Official
Evanston-Mountain View District Ranger.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The decision to be made is whether or not to implement vegetation
treatments in the Blacks Fork project area, and if so, to what degree
and where.
Preliminary Issues
Preliminary issues are the effects of treatments on wildlife
habitat, and the effects of insect and disease outbreaks on current
forest health.
Scoping Process
This notice of intent initiates the scoping process, which guides
the development of the environmental impact statement.
It is important that reviewers provide their comments at such times
and in such manner that they are useful to the agency's preparation of
the environmental impact statement. Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer's concerns and contentions. The submission of
timely and specific comments can affect a reviewer's ability to
participate in subsequent administrative appeal or judicial review.
Dated: May 19, 2009.
Stephen M. Ryberg,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. E9-12124 Filed 5-27-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-M