Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maryland; Reasonably Available Control Technology Requirements for Volatile Organic Compounds: Correction, 24703-24705 [E9-12139]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone to provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators,
participating vessels, and other vessels
and users of the waterway. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
[EPA–R03–OAR–2009–0058; FRL–8909–5]
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
(a) Location. The limits of the safety
zone will include all waters of Copper
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:39 May 22, 2009
Jkt 217001
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Reasonably Available
Control Technology Requirements for
Volatile Organic Compounds:
Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
§ 165.T11–179 Safety zone; Copper
Canyon Clean up; Lake Havasu, Arizona
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
40 CFR Part 52
■
2. Add new temporary zone
§ 165.T11–179 to read as follows:
Dated: May 4, 2009.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. E9–12062 Filed 5–22–09; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
■
Canyon extending from the surface to
the river bottom, within 500 feet of the
divers.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced from 7 a.m. to 11 a.m.
on May 26, 2009. If the event concludes
prior to the scheduled termination time,
the Captain of the Port will cease
enforcement of this safety zone.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
Designated representative, means any
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, state, and federal law
enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the
Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of San Diego or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the
designated representative.
(3) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(4) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
SUMMARY: This document corrects errors
in the amendatory instructions
regarding EPA’s action to convert
Maryland regulations governing volatile
organic compound (VOC) reasonable
available control technology (RACT)
from conditional limited approval to
full approval.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DATE:
24703
Effective Date: May 26, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacqueline Lewis, (215) 814–2037, or by
e-mail at lewis.jacqueline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used we mean EPA.
On March 25, 2009 (74 FR 12556), we
published a final rulemaking action
announcing our approval of State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions to
Maryland regulations (COMAR
26.11.19.02G and COMAR 26.11.06.06)
governing VOC RACT. In that
document, we provided an incorrect
amendatory instruction on page 12559
regarding the removal of nonexistent
tables in paragraphs 52.1072(d) and
52.1073(e). This action corrects the
erroneous amendatory instruction in
part 52 for these paragraphs.
In the Rule document E9–6654
published in the Federal Register on
March 25, 2009 (74 FR 12556),
Amendatory Instruction Numbers 3 and
4 on page 12559, second and third
columns respectively are revised to read
as follows:
‘‘3. In § 52.1072, paragraph (d) is
removed and reserved.
4. In § 52.1073, paragraph (e) is
removed and reserved.’’
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B),
provides that, when an agency for good
cause finds that notice and public
procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a rule
without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. We
have determined that there is good
cause for making today’s rule final
without prior proposal and opportunity
for comment because this rule is not
substantive and imposes no regulatory
requirements, but merely corrects a
citation in a previous action. Thus,
notice and public procedure are
unnecessary. We find that this
constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ and is therefore not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)). Because the agency has made
a ‘‘good cause’’ finding that this action
is not subject to notice-and-comment
requirements under the Administrative
E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM
26MYR1
24704
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Procedures Act or any other statute as
indicated in the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION section above, it is not
subject to the regulatory flexibility
provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C 601 et seq.), or to sections
202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L.
104–4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments or impose a significant
intergovernmental mandate, as
described in sections 203 and 204 of
UMRA. This rule also does not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on
the States, on the relationship between
the national government and the States,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of governments, as specified by
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR
19885, April 23, 1997), because it
approves a State rule implementing a
Federal standard.
This technical correction action does
not involve technical standards; thus
the requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. The rule also
does not involve special consideration
of environmental justice related issues
as required by Executive Order 12898
(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In
issuing this rule, EPA has taken the
necessary steps to eliminate drafting
errors and ambiguity, minimize
potential litigation, and provide a clear
legal standard for affected conduct, as
required by section 3 of Executive Order
12988 (61 FR 4729, February 7, 1996).
EPA has complied with Executive Order
12630 (53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by
examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the
‘‘Attorney General’s Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk
and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings’’ issued under the executive
order. This rule does not impose an
information collection burden under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq).
The Congressional Review Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. Section 808 allows
the issuing agency to make a rule
effective sooner than otherwise
provided by the CRA if the agency
makes a good cause finding that notice
and public procedure is impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest. This determination must be
supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C.
808(2). As stated previously, EPA had
made such a good cause finding,
including the reasons therefore, and
established an effective date of May 26,
2009. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. This correction for
40 CFR part 52, subpart V (Maryland) is
not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5
U.S.C. 804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: May 14, 2009.
William C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
■
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V—Maryland
2. In § 52.1070, the table in paragraph
(c) is amended by revising the entry for
COMAR 26.11.19.02G to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.1070
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA-APPROVED REGULATIONS IN THE MARYLAND SIP
Code of Maryland administrative regulations (COMAR) citation
*
Title/subject
*
*
26.11.19
26.11.19.02 ..............................
*
VerDate Nov<24>2008
*
*
5/4/98, 12/10/01
*
Jkt 217001
Additional explanation/citation at 40 CFR 52.1100
EPA approval date
*
*
Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes
Applicability,
Determining
Compliance, Reporting, and
General Requirements.
*
14:39 May 22, 2009
State effective date
PO 00000
*
Frm 00010
Fmt 4700
3/25/09, 74 FR 12556 ......
*
Sfmt 4700
E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM
*
26MYR1
(c) (174), (c) (175). On 2/
27/03 (68 FR 9012),
EPA approved a revised
rule citation with a State
effective date of 5/8/95
[(c)(182)(i)(D)].
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
*
*
*
*
*
3. In § 52.1072, paragraph (d) is
removed and reserved.
■ 4. In § 52.1073, paragraph (e) is
removed and reserved.
■
[FR Doc. E9–12139 Filed 5–22–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
Facility telephone number is (703) 305–
5805.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Susan Stanton, Registration Division
(7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs,
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001; telephone number:
(703) 305–5218; e-mail address:
stanton.susan@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
40 CFR Part 180
I. General Information
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0270; FRL–8413–7]
A. Does this Action Apply to Me?
You may be potentially affected by
this action if you are an agricultural
producer, food manufacturer, or
pesticide manufacturer. Potentially
affected entities may include, but are
not limited to those engaged in the
following activities:
• Crop production (NAICS code 111).
• Animal production (NAICS code
112).
• Food manufacturing (NAICS code
311).
• Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS
code 32532).
This listing is not intended to be
exhaustive, but rather to provide a guide
for readers regarding entities likely to be
affected by this action. Other types of
entities not listed in this unit could also
be affected. The North American
Industrial Classification System
(NAICS) codes have been provided to
assist you and others in determining
whether this action might apply to
certain entities. If you have any
questions regarding the applicability of
this action to a particular entity, consult
the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
Acibenzolar-S-methyl; Pesticide
Tolerances
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This regulation establishes
tolerances for residues of acibenzolar-Smethyl in or on onion, bulb, subgroup
3-07A; and vegetable, cucurbit, group 9.
It also removes the section 18 timelimited tolerance on onion, bulb which
is superseded by the new tolerance on
onion, bulb, subgroup 3-07A.
Interregional Research Project Number 4
(IR-4) and Syngenta Crop Protection
requested these tolerances under the
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
(FFDCA).
DATES: This regulation is effective May
26, 2009. Objections and requests for
hearings must be received on or before
July 27, 2009, and must be filed in
accordance with the instructions
provided in 40 CFR part 178 (see also
Unit I.C. of the SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION).
EPA has established a
docket for this action under docket
identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2008–0270. All documents in the
docket are listed in the docket index
available at https://www.regulations.gov.
Although listed in the index, some
information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information
(CBI) or other information whose
disclosure is restricted by statute.
Certain other material, such as
copyrighted material, is not placed on
the Internet and will be publicly
available only in hard copy form.
Publicly available docket materials are
available in the electronic docket at
https://www.regulations.gov, or, if only
available in hard copy, at the OPP
Regulatory Public Docket in Rm. S–
4400, One Potomac Yard (South Bldg.),
2777 S. Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. The
Docket Facility is open from 8:30 a.m.
to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday,
excluding legal holidays. The Docket
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:39 May 22, 2009
Jkt 217001
B. How Can I Access Electronic Copies
of this Document?
In addition to accessing electronically
available documents at https://
www.regulations.gov, you may access
this Federal Register document
electronically through the EPA Internet
under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at
https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr. You may
also access a frequently updated
electronic version of EPA’s tolerance
regulations at 40 CFR part 180 through
the Government Printing Office’s e-CFR
cite at https://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
C. Can I File an Objection or Hearing
Request?
Under section 408(g) of FFDCA, 21
U.S.C. 346a, any person may file an
objection to any aspect of this regulation
and may also request a hearing on those
objections. You must file your objection
or request a hearing on this regulation
in accordance with the instructions
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24705
provided in 40 CFR part 178. To ensure
proper receipt by EPA, you must
identify docket ID number EPA–HQ–
OPP–2008–0270 in the subject line on
the first page of your submission. All
requests must be in writing, and must be
mailed or delivered to the Hearing Clerk
as required by 40 CFR part 178 on or
before July 27, 2009.
In addition to filing an objection or
hearing request with the Hearing Clerk
as described in 40 CFR part 178, please
submit a copy of the filing that does not
contain any CBI for inclusion in the
public docket that is described in
ADDRESSES. Information not marked
confidential pursuant to 40 CFR part 2
may be disclosed publicly by EPA
without prior notice. Submit this copy,
identified by docket ID number EPA–
HQ–OPP–2008–0270, by one of the
following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Mail: Office of Pesticide Programs
(OPP) Regulatory Public Docket (7502P),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1200
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
DC 20460–0001.
• Delivery: OPP Regulatory Public
Docket (7502P), Environmental
Protection Agency, Rm. S–4400, One
Potomac Yard (South Bldg.), 2777 S.
Crystal Dr., Arlington, VA. Deliveries
are only accepted during the Docket
Facility’s normal hours of operation
(8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through
Friday, excluding legal holidays).
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information. The
Docket Facility telephone number is
(703) 305–5805.
II. Petition for Tolerance
In the Federal Register of May 16,
2008 (73FR 28461) (FRL–8361–6), EPA
issued a notice pursuant to section
408(d)(3) of FFDCA, 21 U.S.C.
346a(d)(3), announcing the filing of a
pesticide petition (PP 8E7337) by
Interregional Research Project Number 4
(IR-4), 500 College Road East, Suite
201W, Princeton, NJ 08540. The petition
requested that 40 CFR 180.561 be
amended by establishing a tolerance for
residues of the fungicide acibenzolar-Smethyl, benzo(1,2,3)thiadiazole-7carbothioic acid-S-methyl ester, in or on
onion, bulb, subgroup 3-07A at 0.07
parts per million (ppm). That notice
referenced a summary of the petition
prepared on behalf of IR-4 by Syngenta
Crop Protection, the registrant, which is
available to the public in the docket,
https://www.regulations.gov. There were
no comments received in response to
the notice of filing.
E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM
26MYR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 26, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24703-24705]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12139]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R03-OAR-2009-0058; FRL-8909-5]
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Reasonably Available Control Technology Requirements for
Volatile Organic Compounds: Correction
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document corrects errors in the amendatory instructions
regarding EPA's action to convert Maryland regulations governing
volatile organic compound (VOC) reasonable available control technology
(RACT) from conditional limited approval to full approval.
DATE: Effective Date: May 26, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jacqueline Lewis, (215) 814-2037, or
by e-mail at lewis.jacqueline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we'' or
``our'' are used we mean EPA. On March 25, 2009 (74 FR 12556), we
published a final rulemaking action announcing our approval of State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions to Maryland regulations (COMAR
26.11.19.02G and COMAR 26.11.06.06) governing VOC RACT. In that
document, we provided an incorrect amendatory instruction on page 12559
regarding the removal of nonexistent tables in paragraphs 52.1072(d)
and 52.1073(e). This action corrects the erroneous amendatory
instruction in part 52 for these paragraphs.
In the Rule document E9-6654 published in the Federal Register on
March 25, 2009 (74 FR 12556), Amendatory Instruction Numbers 3 and 4 on
page 12559, second and third columns respectively are revised to read
as follows:
``3. In Sec. 52.1072, paragraph (d) is removed and reserved.
4. In Sec. 52.1073, paragraph (e) is removed and reserved.''
Section 553 of the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), provides that, when an agency for good cause finds that
notice and public procedure are impracticable, unnecessary or contrary
to the public interest, the agency may issue a rule without providing
notice and an opportunity for public comment. We have determined that
there is good cause for making today's rule final without prior
proposal and opportunity for comment because this rule is not
substantive and imposes no regulatory requirements, but merely corrects
a citation in a previous action. Thus, notice and public procedure are
unnecessary. We find that this constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993),
this action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and is therefore
not subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355 (May 22, 2001)). Because
the agency has made a ``good cause'' finding that this action is not
subject to notice-and-comment requirements under the Administrative
[[Page 24704]]
Procedures Act or any other statute as indicated in the Supplementary
Information section above, it is not subject to the regulatory
flexibility provisions of the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C 601
et seq.), or to sections 202 and 205 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform
Act of 1995 (UMRA) (Pub. L. 104-4). In addition, this action does not
significantly or uniquely affect small governments or impose a
significant intergovernmental mandate, as described in sections 203 and
204 of UMRA. This rule also does not have a substantial direct effect
on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, as
specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000), nor
will it have substantial direct effects on the States, on the
relationship between the national government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of
governments, as specified by Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August
10, 1999). This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045 (62
FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it approves a State rule
implementing a Federal standard.
This technical correction action does not involve technical
standards; thus the requirements of section 12(d) of the National
Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do
not apply. The rule also does not involve special consideration of
environmental justice related issues as required by Executive Order
12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). In issuing this rule, EPA has
taken the necessary steps to eliminate drafting errors and ambiguity,
minimize potential litigation, and provide a clear legal standard for
affected conduct, as required by section 3 of Executive Order 12988 (61
FR 4729, February 7, 1996). EPA has complied with Executive Order 12630
(53 FR 8859, March 15, 1998) by examining the takings implications of
the rule in accordance with the ``Attorney General's Supplemental
Guidelines for the Evaluation of Risk and Avoidance of Unanticipated
Takings'' issued under the executive order. This rule does not impose
an information collection burden under the Paperwork Reduction Act of
1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq).
The Congressional Review Act (5 U.S.C. 801 et seq.), as added by
the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller
General of the United States. Section 808 allows the issuing agency to
make a rule effective sooner than otherwise provided by the CRA if the
agency makes a good cause finding that notice and public procedure is
impracticable, unnecessary or contrary to the public interest. This
determination must be supported by a brief statement. 5 U.S.C. 808(2).
As stated previously, EPA had made such a good cause finding, including
the reasons therefore, and established an effective date of May 26,
2009. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of
the rule in the Federal Register. This correction for 40 CFR part 52,
subpart V (Maryland) is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Volatile organic
compounds.
Dated: May 14, 2009.
William C. Early,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region III.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart V--Maryland
0
2. In Sec. 52.1070, the table in paragraph (c) is amended by revising
the entry for COMAR 26.11.19.02G to read as follows:
Sec. 52.1070 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
EPA-Approved Regulations in the Maryland SIP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Code of Maryland administrative State effective Additional explanation/citation at
regulations (COMAR) citation Title/subject date EPA approval date 40 CFR 52.1100
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26.11.19 Volatile Organic Compounds from Specific Processes
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
26.11.19.02...................... Applicability, 5/4/98, 12/10/01 3/25/09, 74 FR 12556................. (c) (174), (c) (175). On 2/27/03 (68
Determining FR 9012), EPA approved a revised
Compliance, rule citation with a State
Reporting, and effective date of 5/8/95
General [(c)(182)(i)(D)].
Requirements.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * *
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 24705]]
* * * * *
0
3. In Sec. 52.1072, paragraph (d) is removed and reserved.
0
4. In Sec. 52.1073, paragraph (e) is removed and reserved.
[FR Doc. E9-12139 Filed 5-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
