Safety Zone; Copper Canyon Clean Up; Lake Havasu, AZ, 24701-24703 [E9-12062]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction, from further
environmental documentation because
this rule establishes a safety zone.
An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion
determination are available in the
docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
permitted by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(3) Vessel operators desiring to enter
or operate within the safety zone must
contact the COTP or the COTP’s
representative to obtain permission to
do so. Vessel operators given permission
to enter or operate in the safety zone
must comply with all directions given to
them by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative. Persons and
vessels may request permission to enter
the safety zone by contacting the Patrol
Commander on VHF–16 or through the
Coast Guard Command Center at
telephone (415) 399–3547.
(d) Effective period. This section is
effective from 9 a.m. to 11 p.m., each
day, May 5, 8, 19, 22; June 9, 11, 30; July
2, 14, 17, 28, 31; and every Tuesday,
Thursday, and Friday from August 1,
2009 to December 31, 2009.
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Dated: May 1, 2009.
P.M. Gugg,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Francisco.
[FR Doc. E9–12064 Filed 5–22–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
2. Add temporary § 165.T11–194 to
read as follows:
33 CFR Part 165
■
§ 165.T11–194 Safety Zone; Coast Guard
Air Station San Francisco Airborne Use of
Force Judgmental Training Flights.
(a) Location. The following area is a
safety zone: All waters of San Pablo Bay,
California from surface to bottom,
encompassed by lines connecting the
following points: Beginning at 38°05′11″
N, 122°22′10″ W; thence to 38°03′44″ N,
122°20′12″ W; thence to 38°00′41″ N,
122°25′28″ W; thence to 38°01′45″ N,
122°26′38″ W; thence back to 38°05′11″
N, 122°22′10″ W (NAD 83).
(b) Definitions. As used in this
section, ‘‘designated representative’’
means a Coast Guard Patrol
Commander, including a Coast Guard
coxswain, petty officer, or other officer
operating a Coast Guard vessel or a
Federal, State, or local officer assisting
the Captain of the Port (COTP) San
Francisco in the enforcement of the
safety zone.
(c) Regulations. (1) Under the general
regulations in § 165.23 of this title, entry
into, transiting, or anchoring within this
safety zone is prohibited unless
authorized by the COTP or the COTP’s
designated representative.
(2) The safety zone is closed to all
vessel traffic, except as may be
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:39 May 22, 2009
Jkt 217001
Coast Guard
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0242]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Copper Canyon Clean Up;
Lake Havasu, AZ
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a safety zone upon the
navigable waters of Lake Havasu in
support of the Copper Canyon Clean up.
This safety zone is necessary to provide
for the safety of the participants, crew,
spectators, participating vessels, and
other vessels and users of the waterway.
Persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or
his designated representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m.
through 11 a.m. on May 26, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket are part of docket USCG–2009–
0242 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, selecting
the Advanced Docket Search option on
the right side of the screen, inserting
USCG–2009–0242 in the Docket ID box,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
24701
pressing Enter, and then clicking on the
item in the Docket ID column. They are
also available for inspection or copying
at two locations: The Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays, and the Coast
Guard Sector San Diego, 2710 N. Harbor
Drive, San Diego, CA 92101–1064
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call Petty Officer Shane Jackson,
Waterways Management, U.S. Coast
Guard Sector San Diego, CA at
telephone (619) 278–7262. If you have
questions on viewing the docket, call
Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
pursuant to authority under section 4(a)
of the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision
authorizes an agency to issue a rule
without prior notice and opportunity to
comment when the agency for good
cause finds that those procedures are
‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary
to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that
good cause exists for not publishing a
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because
immediate action is necessary to ensure
the safety of spectators, crew,
participants, and other users and vessels
of the waterway in the vicinity of the
event on the dates and times this rule
will be in effect and delay would be
contrary to the public interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Any delay in the effective date
of this rule would expose the divers to
danger from transiting vessels.
Background and Purpose
The Lake Havasu Divers Association
is sponsoring the Copper Canyon Clean
up, which will involve 40 divers
cleaning the river bottom in Lake
Havasu. The safety zone will be a 500
foot radius around the divers as they
move along the river bottom.
E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM
26MYR1
24702
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
This temporary safety zone is
necessary to prevent vessels from
transiting the area and to protect the
divers and equipment from potential
damage and injury.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a
safety zone that will be enforced from 7
a.m. to 11 a.m. on May 26, 2009. The
limits of the safety zone will include all
waters of Copper Canyon extending
from the surface to the river bottom,
within 500 feet of the divers. The safety
zone is necessary to provide for the
safety of the crew, spectators,
participants, and other vessels and users
of the waterway. Persons and vessels are
prohibited from entering into, transiting
through, or anchoring within this safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port, or his designated
representative.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action under section 3(f) of
Executive Order 12866, Regulatory
Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs
and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that
Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that
Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this rule to be so minimal that a full
Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary.
This determination is based on the size
and location of the safety zone.
Commercial vessels will not be
hindered by the safety zone.
Recreational vessels will not be allowed
to transit through the designated safety
zone during the specified times.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this rule would have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:39 May 22, 2009
Jkt 217001
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
This rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities for the
following reasons: Vessel traffic can
pass safely around the safety zone.
Before the effective period, the coast
Guard will publish a local notice to
mariners (LNM) and will issue
broadcast notice to mariners (BNM)
alerts via marine channel 16 VHF before
the safety zone is enforced.
Though this rule will not result in such
an expenditure, we do discuss the
effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we offer to assist small entities in
understanding the rule so that they can
better evaluate its effects on them and
participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments
on the actions of Federal employees
who enforce, or otherwise determine
compliance with, Federal regulations to
the Small Business and Agriculture
Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman
and the Regional Small Business
Regulatory Fairness Boards. The
Ombudsman evaluates these actions
annually and rates each agency’s
responsiveness to small business. If you
wish to comment on actions by
employees of the Coast Guard, call
1–888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247).
The Coast Guard will not retaliate
against small entities that question or
complain about this rule or any policy
or action of the Coast Guard.
This rule meets applicable standards
in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to
minimize litigation, eliminate
ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection
of information under the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501–
3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism
under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct
effect on State or local governments and
would either preempt State law or
impose a substantial direct cost of
compliance on them. We have analyzed
this rule under that Order and have
determined that it does not have
implications for federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of
private property or otherwise have
taking implications under Executive
Order 12630, Governmental Actions and
Interference with Constitutionally
Protected Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13045, Protection of
Children from Environmental Health
Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not
an economically significant rule and
does not create an environmental risk to
health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal
implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination
With Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations that
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM
26MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 99 / Tuesday, May 26, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one
of a category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule
involves the establishment of a safety
zone to provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators,
participating vessels, and other vessels
and users of the waterway. An
environmental analysis checklist and a
categorical exclusion determination are
available in the docket where indicated
under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
[EPA–R03–OAR–2009–0058; FRL–8909–5]
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
(a) Location. The limits of the safety
zone will include all waters of Copper
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:39 May 22, 2009
Jkt 217001
Approval and Promulgation of Air
Quality Implementation Plans;
Maryland; Reasonably Available
Control Technology Requirements for
Volatile Organic Compounds:
Correction
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendment.
AGENCY:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
§ 165.T11–179 Safety zone; Copper
Canyon Clean up; Lake Havasu, Arizona
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
40 CFR Part 52
■
2. Add new temporary zone
§ 165.T11–179 to read as follows:
Dated: May 4, 2009.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. E9–12062 Filed 5–22–09; 8:45 am]
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
■
Canyon extending from the surface to
the river bottom, within 500 feet of the
divers.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced from 7 a.m. to 11 a.m.
on May 26, 2009. If the event concludes
prior to the scheduled termination time,
the Captain of the Port will cease
enforcement of this safety zone.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
Designated representative, means any
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, state, and federal law
enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the
Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of San Diego or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the
designated representative.
(3) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(4) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other federal, state, or local agencies.
SUMMARY: This document corrects errors
in the amendatory instructions
regarding EPA’s action to convert
Maryland regulations governing volatile
organic compound (VOC) reasonable
available control technology (RACT)
from conditional limited approval to
full approval.
PO 00000
Frm 00009
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DATE:
24703
Effective Date: May 26, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jacqueline Lewis, (215) 814–2037, or by
e-mail at lewis.jacqueline@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we’’ or ‘‘our’’ are used we mean EPA.
On March 25, 2009 (74 FR 12556), we
published a final rulemaking action
announcing our approval of State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions to
Maryland regulations (COMAR
26.11.19.02G and COMAR 26.11.06.06)
governing VOC RACT. In that
document, we provided an incorrect
amendatory instruction on page 12559
regarding the removal of nonexistent
tables in paragraphs 52.1072(d) and
52.1073(e). This action corrects the
erroneous amendatory instruction in
part 52 for these paragraphs.
In the Rule document E9–6654
published in the Federal Register on
March 25, 2009 (74 FR 12556),
Amendatory Instruction Numbers 3 and
4 on page 12559, second and third
columns respectively are revised to read
as follows:
‘‘3. In § 52.1072, paragraph (d) is
removed and reserved.
4. In § 52.1073, paragraph (e) is
removed and reserved.’’
Section 553 of the Administrative
Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B),
provides that, when an agency for good
cause finds that notice and public
procedure are impracticable,
unnecessary or contrary to the public
interest, the agency may issue a rule
without providing notice and an
opportunity for public comment. We
have determined that there is good
cause for making today’s rule final
without prior proposal and opportunity
for comment because this rule is not
substantive and imposes no regulatory
requirements, but merely corrects a
citation in a previous action. Thus,
notice and public procedure are
unnecessary. We find that this
constitutes good cause under 5 U.S.C.
553(b)(B).
Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order (E.O.) 12866
(58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ and is therefore not subject to
review by the Office of Management and
Budget. For this reason, this action is
also not subject to Executive Order
13211, ‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations
That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355 (May
22, 2001)). Because the agency has made
a ‘‘good cause’’ finding that this action
is not subject to notice-and-comment
requirements under the Administrative
E:\FR\FM\26MYR1.SGM
26MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 99 (Tuesday, May 26, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 24701-24703]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12062]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2009-0242]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; Copper Canyon Clean Up; Lake Havasu, AZ
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone upon the
navigable waters of Lake Havasu in support of the Copper Canyon Clean
up. This safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators, participating vessels, and other
vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and vessels are prohibited
from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within this safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his designated
representative.
DATES: This rule is effective from 7 a.m. through 11 a.m. on May 26,
2009.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in
the docket are part of docket USCG-2009-0242 and are available online
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, selecting the Advanced Docket
Search option on the right side of the screen, inserting USCG-2009-0242
in the Docket ID box, pressing Enter, and then clicking on the item in
the Docket ID column. They are also available for inspection or copying
at two locations: The Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, and the Coast
Guard Sector San Diego, 2710 N. Harbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92101-1064
between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this
temporary rule, call Petty Officer Shane Jackson, Waterways Management,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego, CA at telephone (619) 278-7262. If
you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
with respect to this rule because immediate action is necessary to
ensure the safety of spectators, crew, participants, and other users
and vessels of the waterway in the vicinity of the event on the dates
and times this rule will be in effect and delay would be contrary to
the public interest.
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast Guard finds that good cause
exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after
publication in the Federal Register. Any delay in the effective date of
this rule would expose the divers to danger from transiting vessels.
Background and Purpose
The Lake Havasu Divers Association is sponsoring the Copper Canyon
Clean up, which will involve 40 divers cleaning the river bottom in
Lake Havasu. The safety zone will be a 500 foot radius around the
divers as they move along the river bottom.
[[Page 24702]]
This temporary safety zone is necessary to prevent vessels from
transiting the area and to protect the divers and equipment from
potential damage and injury.
Discussion of Rule
The Coast Guard is establishing a safety zone that will be enforced
from 7 a.m. to 11 a.m. on May 26, 2009. The limits of the safety zone
will include all waters of Copper Canyon extending from the surface to
the river bottom, within 500 feet of the divers. The safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of the crew, spectators,
participants, and other vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of
the Port, or his designated representative.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f)
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this rule to be so minimal that a
full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. This determination is based
on the size and location of the safety zone. Commercial vessels will
not be hindered by the safety zone. Recreational vessels will not be
allowed to transit through the designated safety zone during the
specified times.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities''
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields,
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This rule will not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons: Vessel
traffic can pass safely around the safety zone. Before the effective
period, the coast Guard will publish a local notice to mariners (LNM)
and will issue broadcast notice to mariners (BNM) alerts via marine
channel 16 VHF before the safety zone is enforced.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or
action of the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This rule calls for no new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).
Federalism
A rule has implications for federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for
federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order
13175, Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations that Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of
[[Page 24703]]
Management and Budget, with an explanation of why using these standards
would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g.,
specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test
methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices)
that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 0023-01 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have concluded that this action is one of a category of actions which
do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the
human environment. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-
1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction. This rule involves the
establishment of a safety zone to provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators, participating vessels, and other
vessels and users of the waterway. An environmental analysis checklist
and a categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
0
2. Add new temporary zone Sec. 165.T11-179 to read as follows:
Sec. 165.T11-179 Safety zone; Copper Canyon Clean up; Lake Havasu,
Arizona
(a) Location. The limits of the safety zone will include all waters
of Copper Canyon extending from the surface to the river bottom, within
500 feet of the divers.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 7 a.m.
to 11 a.m. on May 26, 2009. If the event concludes prior to the
scheduled termination time, the Captain of the Port will cease
enforcement of this safety zone.
(c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section:
Designated representative, means any commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, and local, state, and federal law enforcement vessels who
have been authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port of San Diego or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated representative.
(3) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed.
(4) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other federal, state, or
local agencies.
Dated: May 4, 2009.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. E9-12062 Filed 5-22-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P