Preemption, 24693-24694 [E9-12250]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 98 / Friday, May 22, 2009 / Presidential Documents
24693
Presidential Documents
Memorandum of May 20, 2009
Preemption
Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies
From our Nation’s founding, the American constitutional order has been
a Federal system, ensuring a strong role for both the national Government
and the States. The Federal Government’s role in promoting the general
welfare and guarding individual liberties is critical, but State law and national
law often operate concurrently to provide independent safeguards for the
public. Throughout our history, State and local governments have frequently
protected health, safety, and the environment more aggressively than has
the national Government.
An understanding of the important role of State governments in our Federal
system is reflected in longstanding practices by executive departments and
agencies, which have shown respect for the traditional prerogatives of the
States. In recent years, however, notwithstanding Executive Order 13132
of August 4, 1999 (Federalism), executive departments and agencies have
sometimes announced that their regulations preempt State law, including
State common law, without explicit preemption by the Congress or an otherwise sufficient basis under applicable legal principles.
The purpose of this memorandum is to state the general policy of my
Administration that preemption of State law by executive departments and
agencies should be undertaken only with full consideration of the legitimate
prerogatives of the States and with a sufficient legal basis for preemption.
Executive departments and agencies should be mindful that in our Federal
system, the citizens of the several States have distinctive circumstances
and values, and that in many instances it is appropriate for them to apply
to themselves rules and principles that reflect these circumstances and values.
As Justice Brandeis explained more than 70 years ago, ‘‘[i]t is one of the
happy incidents of the federal system that a single courageous state may,
if its citizens choose, serve as a laboratory; and try novel social and economic
experiments without risk to the rest of the country.’’
To ensure that executive departments and agencies include statements of
preemption in regulations only when such statements have a sufficient legal
basis:
1. Heads of departments and agencies should not include in regulatory
preambles statements that the department or agency intends to preempt
State law through the regulation except where preemption provisions are
also included in the codified regulation.
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
2. Heads of departments and agencies should not include preemption
provisions in codified regulations except where such provisions would be
justified under legal principles governing preemption, including the principles outlined in Executive Order 13132.
3. Heads of departments and agencies should review regulations issued
within the past 10 years that contain statements in regulatory preambles
or codified provisions intended by the department or agency to preempt
State law, in order to decide whether such statements or provisions are
justified under applicable legal principles governing preemption. Where the
head of a department or agency determines that a regulatory statement
of preemption or codified regulatory provision cannot be so justified, the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:54 May 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4790
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\22MYO0.SGM
22MYO0
24694
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 98 / Friday, May 22, 2009 / Presidential Documents
head of that department or agency should initiate appropriate action, which
may include amendment of the relevant regulation.
Executive departments and agencies shall carry out the provisions of this
memorandum to the extent permitted by law and consistent with their
statutory authorities. Heads of departments and agencies should consult
as necessary with the Attorney General and the Office of Management and
Budget’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs to determine how
the requirements of this memorandum apply to particular situations.
This memorandum is not intended to, and does not, create any right or
benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any
party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its
officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
The Director of the Office of Management and Budget is authorized and
directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.
THE WHITE HOUSE,
Washington, May 20, 2009
[FR Doc. E9–12250
Filed 5–21–09; 11:15 am]
VerDate Nov<24>2008
12:48 May 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4790
Sfmt 4790
E:\FR\FM\22MYO0.SGM
22MYO0
OB#1.EPS
sroberts on PROD1PC70 with PROPOSALS
Billing code 3110–01–P
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 98 (Friday, May 22, 2009)]
[Presidential Documents]
[Pages 24693-24694]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12250]
Presidential Documents
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 98 / Friday, May 22, 2009 /
Presidential Documents
[[Page 24693]]
Memorandum of May 20, 2009
Preemption
Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and
Agencies
From our Nation's founding, the American constitutional
order has been a Federal system, ensuring a strong role
for both the national Government and the States. The
Federal Government's role in promoting the general
welfare and guarding individual liberties is critical,
but State law and national law often operate
concurrently to provide independent safeguards for the
public. Throughout our history, State and local
governments have frequently protected health, safety,
and the environment more aggressively than has the
national Government.
An understanding of the important role of State
governments in our Federal system is reflected in
longstanding practices by executive departments and
agencies, which have shown respect for the traditional
prerogatives of the States. In recent years, however,
notwithstanding Executive Order 13132 of August 4, 1999
(Federalism), executive departments and agencies have
sometimes announced that their regulations preempt
State law, including State common law, without explicit
preemption by the Congress or an otherwise sufficient
basis under applicable legal principles.
The purpose of this memorandum is to state the general
policy of my Administration that preemption of State
law by executive departments and agencies should be
undertaken only with full consideration of the
legitimate prerogatives of the States and with a
sufficient legal basis for preemption. Executive
departments and agencies should be mindful that in our
Federal system, the citizens of the several States have
distinctive circumstances and values, and that in many
instances it is appropriate for them to apply to
themselves rules and principles that reflect these
circumstances and values. As Justice Brandeis explained
more than 70 years ago, ``[i]t is one of the happy
incidents of the federal system that a single
courageous state may, if its citizens choose, serve as
a laboratory; and try novel social and economic
experiments without risk to the rest of the country.''
To ensure that executive departments and agencies
include statements of preemption in regulations only
when such statements have a sufficient legal basis:
1. Heads of departments and agencies should not
include in regulatory preambles statements that the
department or agency intends to preempt State law
through the regulation except where preemption
provisions are also included in the codified
regulation.
2. Heads of departments and agencies should not
include preemption provisions in codified regulations
except where such provisions would be justified under
legal principles governing preemption, including the
principles outlined in Executive Order 13132.
3. Heads of departments and agencies should review
regulations issued within the past 10 years that
contain statements in regulatory preambles or codified
provisions intended by the department or agency to
preempt State law, in order to decide whether such
statements or provisions are justified under applicable
legal principles governing preemption. Where the head
of a department or agency determines that a regulatory
statement of preemption or codified regulatory
provision cannot be so justified, the
[[Page 24694]]
head of that department or agency should initiate
appropriate action, which may include amendment of the
relevant regulation.
Executive departments and agencies shall carry out the
provisions of this memorandum to the extent permitted
by law and consistent with their statutory authorities.
Heads of departments and agencies should consult as
necessary with the Attorney General and the Office of
Management and Budget's Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs to determine how the requirements of
this memorandum apply to particular situations.
This memorandum is not intended to, and does not,
create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural,
enforceable at law or in equity by any party against
the United States, its departments, agencies, or
entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any
other person.
The Director of the Office of Management and Budget is
authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in
the Federal Register.
(Presidential Sig.)
THE WHITE HOUSE,
Washington, May 20, 2009
[FR Doc. E9-12250
Filed 5-21-09; 11:15 am]
Billing code 3110-01-P