WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding United States-Certain Country of Origin Labeling Requirements, 24059-24061 [E9-12004]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 98 / Friday, May 22, 2009 / Notices the Exchange’s request and designates the proposal operative upon filing.16 At any time within 60 days of the filing of such proposed rule change the Commission may summarily abrogate such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposal is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an e-mail to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File No. SR–BATS–2009–013 on the subject line. erowe on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES Paper Comments • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–BATS–2009–013. This file number should be included on the subject line if e-mail is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule changes between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for inspection and copying in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of such filing also will be available for inspection and copying at 16 For the purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has considered the proposed rule’s impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f). VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:18 May 21, 2009 Jkt 217001 24059 the principal office of BATS. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File No. SR–BATS–2009–013 and should be submitted on or before June 12, 2009. Dated: May 18, 2009. C. Miller Crouch, Acting Assistant Secretary for Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State. [FR Doc. E9–12017 Filed 5–21–09; 8:45 am] For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.17 Florence E. Harmon, Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. E9–11941 Filed 5–21–09; 8:45 am] [Docket No. WTO/DS384 and WTO/DS386] BILLING CODE 8010–01–P [Public Notice 6630] Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘James Ensor’’ SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236 of October 19, 1999, as amended, and Delegation of Authority No. 257 of April 15, 2003 [68 FR 19875], I hereby determine that the objects to be included in the exhibition ‘‘James Ensor,’’ imported from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at The Museum of Modern Art, New York, NY, from on or about June 28, 2009, until on or about September 21, 2009, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of these Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal Register. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a list of the exhibit objects, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State, telephone: (202–453–8050). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA– 44, 301 4th Street, SW., Room 700, Washington, DC 20547–0001. PO 00000 CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). Frm 00076 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding United States—Certain Country of Origin Labeling Requirements AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative. ACTION: Notice; request for comments. DEPARTMENT OF STATE 17 17 BILLING CODE 4710–05–P SUMMARY: The Office of the United States Trade Representative (‘‘USTR’’) is providing notice that the United States received additional requests for consultations under the Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization (‘‘WTO Agreement’’) concerning certain mandatory country of origin labeling (COOL) requirements from Canada and Mexico in separate letters dated May 7, 2009. Those requests may be found at https:// www.wto.org contained in documents designated as WT/DS384/1/Add.1 for Canada and WT/DS386/1/Add.1 for Mexico. USTR invites written comments from the public concerning the issues raised in these disputes. DATES: Although USTR will accept any comments received during the course of the dispute settlement proceedings, comments should be submitted on or before July 1, 2009, to be assured of timely consideration by USTR. ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted electronically to https:// www.regulations.gov, docket number USTR–2009–0004. If you are unable to provide submissions by https:// www.regulations.gov, please contact Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–9483 to arrange for an alternative method of transmission. If (as explained below), the comment contains confidential information, then the comment should be submitted by fax only to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–3640. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Priti Seksaria Agrawal, Associate General Counsel, Office of the United States Trade Representative, 600 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20508, (202) 395– 3150. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USTR is providing notice that consultations have been requested pursuant to the WTO Understanding on Rules and Procedures E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM 22MYN1 24060 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 98 / Friday, May 22, 2009 / Notices Governing the Settlement of Disputes (‘‘DSU’’). If such consultations should fail to resolve the matter and a dispute settlement panel is established pursuant to the DSU, such panel, which would hold its meetings in Geneva, Switzerland, would be expected to issue a report on its findings and recommendations within nine months after it is established. erowe on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES Major Issues Raised by Canada On December 1, 2008, Canada requested consultations regarding U.S. mandatory COOL, and consultations were held on December 16, 2008. In its December 1, 2008 consultations request, Canada challenged the COOL provisions in the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as amended by the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act, 2008 (2008 Farm Bill), and implemented in the U.S. Department of Agriculture (‘‘USDA’’) Interim Final Rule published on August 1, 2008. In Canada’s May 7, 2009 letter requesting further consultations, Canada noted that the Interim Final Rule had been replaced by a USDA Final Rule published on January 15, 2009, and that on February 20, 2009, the Secretary of Agriculture issued a letter regarding implementation of the Final Rule. Canada alleges that the U.S. measures appear to be inconsistent with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (‘‘GATT 1994’’), Articles III:4, IX:2, IX:4, and X:3, the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (‘‘TBT Agreement’’), Article 2 or in the alternative, the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (‘‘SPS Agreement’’), Articles 2, 5, and 7, and the Agreement on Rules of Origin, Article 2. Additionally, Canada alleges these violations nullify or impair the benefits accruing to Canada under those Agreements and further appear to nullify or impair the benefits accruing to Canada in the sense of GATT 1994, Article XXIII:1(b). Major Issues Raised by Mexico On December 17, 2008, Mexico requested consultations regarding U.S. mandatory COOL, and consultations were held on February 27, 2009. In its December 17, 2008 consultations request, Mexico challenged the COOL provisions in the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as amended by the Farm, Security, and Rural Investment Act of 2002 and the Food, Conservation, and Energy Act, 2008, and implemented by the regulations published in 7 CFR parts 60 and 65. In Mexico’s May 7, 2009 letter requesting further consultations, it explained that this request concerns VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:18 May 21, 2009 Jkt 217001 related measures and amendments adopted by the United States after Mexico’s initial request for consultations, including USDA’s Final Rule on COOL published on January 15, 2009 and the Secretary of Agriculture’s letter on COOL dated February 20, 2009. Mexico alleges that the U.S. measures appear to be inconsistent with the GATT 1994, Articles III, IX, and X, the TBT Agreement, Article 2 and 12 or in the alternative, the SPS Agreement, Articles 2, 5, and 7, and the Agreement on Rules of Origin, Article 2. Additionally, Mexico alleges these violations nullify or impair the benefits accruing to Mexico under those Agreements and further appear to nullify or impair the benefits accruing to Mexico in the sense of GATT 1994, Article XXIII:1(b). Public Comment: Requirements for Submissions Interested persons are invited to submit written comments concerning the issues raised in this dispute. Persons may submit public comments electronically to https:// www.regulations.gov docket number USTR–2009–0004. If you are unable to provide submissions by https:// www.regulations.gov, please contact Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–9483 to arrange for an alternative method of transmission. To submit comments via https:// www.regulations.gov, enter docket number USTR–2009–0004 on the home page and click ‘‘go.’’ The site will provide a search-results page listing all documents associated with this docket. Find a reference to this notice by selecting ‘‘Notice’’ under ‘‘Document Type’’ on the left side of the searchresults page, and click on the link entitled ‘‘Send a Comment or Submission.’’ (For further information on using the https://www.regulations.gov Web site, please consult the resources provided on the Web site by clicking on ‘‘How to Use This Site’’ on the left side of the home page.) The https://www.regulations.gov site provides the option of providing comments by filling in a ‘‘General Comments’’ field, or by attaching a document. It is expected that most comments will be provided in an attached document. If a document is attached, it is sufficient to type ‘‘See attached’’ in the ‘‘General Comments’’ field. A person requesting that information contained in a comment submitted by that person be treated as confidential business information must certify that such information is business confidential and would not customarily PO 00000 Frm 00077 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 be released to the public by the submitter. Confidential business information must be clearly designated as such and the submission must be marked ‘‘BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL’’ at the top and bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page. Any comment containing business confidential information must be submitted by fax to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–3640. A non-confidential summary of the confidential information must be submitted to https://www.regulations.gov. The nonconfidential summary will be placed in the docket and open to public inspection. Information or advice contained in a comment submitted, other than business confidential information, may be determined by USTR to be confidential in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of the Trade Act of 1974 (19 U.S.C. 2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that information or advice may qualify as such, the submitter— (1) Must clearly so designate the information or advice; (2) Must clearly mark the material as ‘‘SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE’’ at the top and bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page; and (3) Must provide a non-confidential summary of the information or advice. Any comment containing confidential information must be submitted by fax to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395–3640. A non-confidential summary of the confidential information must be submitted to https://www.regulations.gov or by fax. The non-confidential summary will be placed in the docket and open to public inspection. USTR will maintain a docket on this dispute settlement proceeding, accessible to the public. The public file will include non-confidential comments received by USTR from the public with respect to the dispute; if a dispute settlement panel is convened or in the event of an appeal from such a panel, the U.S. submissions, any nonconfidential submissions, or nonconfidential summaries of submissions, received from other participants in the dispute; the report of the panel; and, if applicable, the report of the Appellate Body. Comments will be placed in the docket and open to public inspection pursuant to 15 CFR 2006.13, except confidential business information exempt from public inspection in accordance with 15 CFR 2006.15 or information determined by USTR to be confidential in accordance with 19 U.S.C. 2155(g)(2). Comments open to E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM 22MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 98 / Friday, May 22, 2009 / Notices public inspection may be viewed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web site. Daniel Brinza, Assistant United States Trade Representative, for Monitoring and Enforcement. [FR Doc. E9–12004 Filed 5–21–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3190–W9–P DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Office of the Secretary [Docket No. OST–2009–0121] Notice of Request for Information Collection Approval Office of the Secretary. Notice. AGENCY: ACTION: erowe on PROD1PC63 with NOTICES SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) this notice announces the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (DOT) intention to renew the utilization of the individual employment discrimination complaint form when processing Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) discrimination complaints filed by applicants for employment with the Department. The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) approved the form in 2006 with its renewal required by July 31, 2009. DATES: Comments on this notice must be received by July 21, 2009. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments [identified by DOT Docket Number OST–2009–0121] by any of the following methods: • Web Site: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments on the DOT electronic docket site. • Fax: 202–493–2251. • Mail: Docket Operations, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590. VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:18 May 21, 2009 Jkt 217001 • Hand Delivery or Courier: West Building, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except on Federal holidays. • Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Instructions: All submissions must include the agency name (Office of the Secretary, DOT) and docket number for this rulemaking. You should provide two copies of your comments if you submit them by mail or courier. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to https:// www.regulations.gov, including any personal information provided, and will be available to Internet users. You may review DOT’s complete Privacy Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477) or you may visit https:// DocketsInfo.dot.gov. Docket: For Internet access to the docket to read background documents and comments received, go to https:// www.regulations.gov. Background documents and comments received may also be viewed at the U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Docket Operations, West Building, Room W12–140, Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal Holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tami Wright, Associate Director, Compliance Operations Division (S–34), Departmental Office of Civil Rights, Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, 202–366–9370 or (TTY) 202–366–0663. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Form Title: Individual Complaint of Employment Discrimination. OMB Control Number: OMB #2105– 0556. PO 00000 Frm 00078 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 24061 Type of Request: OMB renewal. Abstract: DOT will utilize the form to collect information necessary to process EEO discrimination complaints filed by individuals who are not Federal employees and are applicants for employment with the Department. These complaints are processed in accordance with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s regulations, 29 CFR part 1614, as amended. DOT will use the form to: (a) Request requisite information from the applicant for processing his/her EEO employment discrimination complaint; and (b) obtain information to identify an individual or his or her attorney or other representative, if appropriate. An applicant’s filing of an EEO employment complaint is solely voluntary. DOT estimates that it takes an applicant approximately one hour to complete the form. Respondents: Job Applicants filing EEO employment discrimination complaints. Estimated Number of Respondents: 10 per year. Estimated Total Burden on Respondents: 10 hours per year. Comments are invited on: (a) Whether the proposed collection of information is reasonable for the proper performance of the EEO functions of the Department, and (b) the accuracy of the Department’s estimate of the burden of the proposed information collection. All responses to the notice will be summarized and included in the request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments also will become a matter of public record. Issued in Washington, DC, on May 15, 2009. Mary N. Whigham Jones, Acting Director, Departmental Office of Civil Rights. BILLING CODE 4910–9X–P E:\FR\FM\22MYN1.SGM 22MYN1

Agencies

Office of the United States Trade Representative

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 98 (Friday, May 22, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 24059-24061]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-12004]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

[Docket No. WTO/DS384 and WTO/DS386]


WTO Dispute Settlement Proceeding Regarding United States--
Certain Country of Origin Labeling Requirements

AGENCY: Office of the United States Trade Representative.

ACTION: Notice; request for comments.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of the United States Trade Representative 
(``USTR'') is providing notice that the United States received 
additional requests for consultations under the Marrakesh Agreement 
Establishing the World Trade Organization (``WTO Agreement'') 
concerning certain mandatory country of origin labeling (COOL) 
requirements from Canada and Mexico in separate letters dated May 7, 
2009. Those requests may be found at https://www.wto.org contained in 
documents designated as WT/DS384/1/Add.1 for Canada and WT/DS386/1/
Add.1 for Mexico. USTR invites written comments from the public 
concerning the issues raised in these disputes.

DATES: Although USTR will accept any comments received during the 
course of the dispute settlement proceedings, comments should be 
submitted on or before July 1, 2009, to be assured of timely 
consideration by USTR.

ADDRESSES: Comments should be submitted electronically to https://www.regulations.gov, docket number USTR-2009-0004. If you are unable to 
provide submissions by https://www.regulations.gov, please contact Sandy 
McKinzy at (202) 395-9483 to arrange for an alternative method of 
transmission. If (as explained below), the comment contains 
confidential information, then the comment should be submitted by fax 
only to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-3640.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Priti Seksaria Agrawal, Associate 
General Counsel, Office of the United States Trade Representative, 600 
17th Street, NW., Washington, DC 20508, (202) 395-3150.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: USTR is providing notice that consultations 
have been requested pursuant to the WTO Understanding on Rules and 
Procedures

[[Page 24060]]

Governing the Settlement of Disputes (``DSU''). If such consultations 
should fail to resolve the matter and a dispute settlement panel is 
established pursuant to the DSU, such panel, which would hold its 
meetings in Geneva, Switzerland, would be expected to issue a report on 
its findings and recommendations within nine months after it is 
established.

Major Issues Raised by Canada

    On December 1, 2008, Canada requested consultations regarding U.S. 
mandatory COOL, and consultations were held on December 16, 2008. In 
its December 1, 2008 consultations request, Canada challenged the COOL 
provisions in the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as amended by the 
Food, Conservation, and Energy Act, 2008 (2008 Farm Bill), and 
implemented in the U.S. Department of Agriculture (``USDA'') Interim 
Final Rule published on August 1, 2008. In Canada's May 7, 2009 letter 
requesting further consultations, Canada noted that the Interim Final 
Rule had been replaced by a USDA Final Rule published on January 15, 
2009, and that on February 20, 2009, the Secretary of Agriculture 
issued a letter regarding implementation of the Final Rule.
    Canada alleges that the U.S. measures appear to be inconsistent 
with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (``GATT 1994''), 
Articles III:4, IX:2, IX:4, and X:3, the Agreement on Technical 
Barriers to Trade (``TBT Agreement''), Article 2 or in the alternative, 
the Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures 
(``SPS Agreement''), Articles 2, 5, and 7, and the Agreement on Rules 
of Origin, Article 2. Additionally, Canada alleges these violations 
nullify or impair the benefits accruing to Canada under those 
Agreements and further appear to nullify or impair the benefits 
accruing to Canada in the sense of GATT 1994, Article XXIII:1(b).

Major Issues Raised by Mexico

    On December 17, 2008, Mexico requested consultations regarding U.S. 
mandatory COOL, and consultations were held on February 27, 2009. In 
its December 17, 2008 consultations request, Mexico challenged the COOL 
provisions in the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as amended by the 
Farm, Security, and Rural Investment Act of 2002 and the Food, 
Conservation, and Energy Act, 2008, and implemented by the regulations 
published in 7 CFR parts 60 and 65. In Mexico's May 7, 2009 letter 
requesting further consultations, it explained that this request 
concerns related measures and amendments adopted by the United States 
after Mexico's initial request for consultations, including USDA's 
Final Rule on COOL published on January 15, 2009 and the Secretary of 
Agriculture's letter on COOL dated February 20, 2009.
    Mexico alleges that the U.S. measures appear to be inconsistent 
with the GATT 1994, Articles III, IX, and X, the TBT Agreement, Article 
2 and 12 or in the alternative, the SPS Agreement, Articles 2, 5, and 
7, and the Agreement on Rules of Origin, Article 2. Additionally, 
Mexico alleges these violations nullify or impair the benefits accruing 
to Mexico under those Agreements and further appear to nullify or 
impair the benefits accruing to Mexico in the sense of GATT 1994, 
Article XXIII:1(b).

Public Comment: Requirements for Submissions

    Interested persons are invited to submit written comments 
concerning the issues raised in this dispute. Persons may submit public 
comments electronically to https://www.regulations.gov docket number 
USTR-2009-0004. If you are unable to provide submissions by https://www.regulations.gov, please contact Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-9483 to 
arrange for an alternative method of transmission.
    To submit comments via https://www.regulations.gov, enter docket 
number USTR-2009-0004 on the home page and click ``go.'' The site will 
provide a search-results page listing all documents associated with 
this docket. Find a reference to this notice by selecting ``Notice'' 
under ``Document Type'' on the left side of the search-results page, 
and click on the link entitled ``Send a Comment or Submission.'' (For 
further information on using the https://www.regulations.gov Web site, 
please consult the resources provided on the Web site by clicking on 
``How to Use This Site'' on the left side of the home page.)
    The https://www.regulations.gov site provides the option of 
providing comments by filling in a ``General Comments'' field, or by 
attaching a document. It is expected that most comments will be 
provided in an attached document. If a document is attached, it is 
sufficient to type ``See attached'' in the ``General Comments'' field.
    A person requesting that information contained in a comment 
submitted by that person be treated as confidential business 
information must certify that such information is business confidential 
and would not customarily be released to the public by the submitter. 
Confidential business information must be clearly designated as such 
and the submission must be marked ``BUSINESS CONFIDENTIAL'' at the top 
and bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page. Any comment 
containing business confidential information must be submitted by fax 
to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-3640. A non-confidential summary of the 
confidential information must be submitted to https://www.regulations.gov. The non-confidential summary will be placed in the 
docket and open to public inspection.
    Information or advice contained in a comment submitted, other than 
business confidential information, may be determined by USTR to be 
confidential in accordance with section 135(g)(2) of the Trade Act of 
1974 (19 U.S.C. 2155(g)(2)). If the submitter believes that information 
or advice may qualify as such, the submitter--
    (1) Must clearly so designate the information or advice;
    (2) Must clearly mark the material as ``SUBMITTED IN CONFIDENCE'' 
at the top and bottom of the cover page and each succeeding page; and
    (3) Must provide a non-confidential summary of the information or 
advice. Any comment containing confidential information must be 
submitted by fax to Sandy McKinzy at (202) 395-3640. A non-confidential 
summary of the confidential information must be submitted to https://www.regulations.gov or by fax. The non-confidential summary will be 
placed in the docket and open to public inspection.
    USTR will maintain a docket on this dispute settlement proceeding, 
accessible to the public. The public file will include non-confidential 
comments received by USTR from the public with respect to the dispute; 
if a dispute settlement panel is convened or in the event of an appeal 
from such a panel, the U.S. submissions, any non-confidential 
submissions, or non-confidential summaries of submissions, received 
from other participants in the dispute; the report of the panel; and, 
if applicable, the report of the Appellate Body.
    Comments will be placed in the docket and open to public inspection 
pursuant to 15 CFR 2006.13, except confidential business information 
exempt from public inspection in accordance with 15 CFR 2006.15 or 
information determined by USTR to be confidential in accordance with 19 
U.S.C. 2155(g)(2). Comments open to

[[Page 24061]]

public inspection may be viewed on the https://www.regulations.gov Web 
site.

Daniel Brinza,
Assistant United States Trade Representative, for Monitoring and 
Enforcement.
[FR Doc. E9-12004 Filed 5-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3190-W9-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.