Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services 009 Compliance Tracking and Management System (CTMS), 23957-23958 [E9-11966]
Download as PDF
23957
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 74, No. 98
Friday, May 22, 2009
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS–2009–0013]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of
Exemptions; U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services 009 Compliance
Tracking and Management System
(CTMS)
Privacy Office, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
erowe on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS-1
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland
Security (DHS) is amending its
regulations to exempt portions of a
system of records from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974.
Specifically, DHS proposes to exempt
portions of the Compliance Tracking
and Management System (CTMS) from
one or more provisions of the Privacy
Act because of criminal, civil and
administrative enforcement
requirements. CTMS is a system of
records that DHS will use to support the
Verification Division of U.S. Citizenship
and Immigration Services (USCIS).
CTMS collects and uses information
necessary for DHS to support
monitoring and compliance activities
for researching and managing misuse,
abuse, discrimination, breach of
privacy, and fraudulent use of
information obtained through two
USCIS Verification Division programs:
Systematic Alien Verification for
Entitlements (SAVE); and E-Verify.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before June 22, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number [DHS–
2009–0013] by one of the following
methods:
• Federal e-Rulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 703–483–2999.
• Mail: Mary Ellen Callahan, Chief
Privacy Officer, Privacy Office,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
12:11 May 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528.
• Instructions: All submissions
received must include the agency name
and docket number for this rulemaking.
All comments received will be posted
without change to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information provided.
• Docket: For access to the docket to
read background documents or
comments received, go to https://
www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general questions please contact: Claire
Stapleton (202–358–7777), Verification
Division Privacy Branch Chief, or
Donald K. Hawkins (202–272–1400),
Citizenship and Immigration Services
Privacy Officer, 20 Massachusetts
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20529.
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services, Department of Homeland
Security, Washington, DC 20529. For
privacy issues please contact: Mary
Ellen Callahan (703–235–0780), Chief
Privacy Officer, Privacy Office, U.S.
Department of Homeland Security,
Washington, DC 20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: The Department of
Homeland Security (DHS), elsewhere in
this edition of the Federal Register,
published a Privacy Act system of
records notice describing records in the
Compliance Tracking and Management
System (CTMS). This system of records
is owned and operated by U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services
(USCIS). CTMS collects and uses
information necessary to support
monitoring and compliance for
researching and managing misuse,
abuse, discrimination, breach of
privacy, and fraudulent use of USCIS
Verification Division’s verification
programs: (1) Systematic Alien
Verification for Entitlements (SAVE);
and (2) E-Verify. SAVE and E-Verify are
both congressionally mandated
programs for the verification of
information about an individual based
on documents presented to either a
government agency or employer. EVerify, formerly known as the Basic
Pilot Program, was established under
the Illegal Immigration Reform and
Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996,
Public Law 104–208 section 401, 8
U.S.C. 1324a note. SAVE was
established under the Immigration and
Control Act of 1986, Public Law 100–
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
360 section 121(c).The specifics of the
SAVE and E-Verify Program can be
found on the DHS Web site and in the
Verification Information System (VIS)
System of Records Notice (SORN) and
Privacy Impact Assessments (PIA).
Congress further required that DHS
provide reasonable safeguards to
prevent these programs from misuse,
abuse, discrimination, breach of
privacy, and fraudulent use.
The Verification Division of USCIS
has established a Monitoring and
Compliance Branch to monitor and
research potential cases of misuse,
abuse, discrimination, breach of
privacy, and fraudulent use. CTMS is
the system that supports this effort. DHS
proposes to exempt portions of the
Compliance Tracking and Management
System (CTMS) from one or more
provisions of the Privacy Act because of
criminal, civil and administrative
enforcement requirements. The Privacy
Act allows Government agencies to
exempt certain records from the access
and amendment provisions. If an agency
claims an exemption, however, it must
issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
(NPRM) to make clear to the public the
reasons why a particular exemption is
claimed.
In this NPRM, DHS now is proposing
to exempt CTMS, in part, from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act. Some
information in CTMS is shared with and
contributes to law enforcement
activities of DHS components and other
Federal agencies. These exemptions are
needed to protect information relating to
DHS activities from disclosure to
subjects or others related to these
activities. Specifically, the exemptions
are required to preclude subjects of
these activities from frustrating USCIS
monitoring and compliance processes
and to avoid disclosure of research
techniques, as these processes and
techniques may inform law enforcement
investigations. Disclosure of information
to the subject of the inquiry could also
permit the subject to avoid detection or
apprehension.
The exemptions proposed here are
standard law enforcement and national
security exemptions exercised by a large
number of Federal law enforcement and
intelligence agencies. In appropriate
circumstances, where compliance
would not appear to interfere with or
adversely affect the law enforcement
purposes of this system and the overall
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
23958
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 98 / Friday, May 22, 2009 / Proposed Rules
law enforcement process, the applicable
exemptions may be waived.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Privacy, Freedom of information.
For the reasons stated in the
preamble, DHS proposes to amend
Chapter I of Title 6, Code of Federal
Regulations, as follows:
PART 5—DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS
AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for part 5
continues to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 107–296, 116 Stat.
2135, 6 U.S.C. 101 et seq.; 5 U.S.C. 301.
Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Add at the end of Appendix C to
Part 5, Exemption of Record Systems
under the Privacy Act, the following
new paragraph 14:
Appendix C to Part 5—DHS Systems of
Records Exempt From the Privacy Act
erowe on PROD1PC63 with PROPOSALS-1
*
*
*
*
*
14. The Department of Homeland Security
Compliance Tracking and Management
System (CTMS) consists of electronic and
paper files that will be used by DHS and its
components. This system of records will be
used to perform a range of information
management and analytic functions
involving minimizing misuse, abuse,
discrimination, breach of privacy, and
fraudulent use of SAVE and E-Verify.
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) of the Privacy
Act, this system is exempt from the following
provisions of the Privacy Act, subject to the
limitations set forth in those subsections: 5
U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1), (e)(4)(G),
(e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), and (f). Exemptions from
these particular subsections are justified, on
a case-by-case basis to be determined at the
time a request is made, for the following
reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for
Disclosures) because release of the
accounting of disclosures could alert the
subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation to the existence of the investigation,
and reveal investigative interest on the part
of DHS as well as the recipient agency.
Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
present a serious impediment to law
enforcement efforts and/or efforts to preserve
national security. Disclosure of the
accounting would also permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the
investigation, to tamper with witnesses or
evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension, which would undermine the
entire investigative process.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records)
because access to the records contained in
this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or
potential criminal, civil, or regulatory
violation, to the existence of the
investigation, and reveal investigative
interest on the part of DHS or another agency.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:40 May 21, 2009
Jkt 217001
Access to the records could permit the
individual who is the subject of a record to
impede the investigation, to tamper with
witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection
or apprehension. Amendment of the records
could interfere with ongoing investigations
and law enforcement activities and would
impose an impossible administrative burden
by requiring investigations to be
continuously reinvestigated. In addition,
permitting access and amendment to such
information could disclose security-sensitive
information that could be detrimental to
homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and
Necessity of Information) because in the
course of investigations into potential
violations of Federal law, the accuracy of
information obtained or introduced
occasionally may be unclear or the
information may not be strictly relevant or
necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interest of effective law enforcement, it is
appropriate to retain all information that may
aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(d) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I)
(Agency Requirements), and (f) (Agency
Rules) because portions of this system are
exempt from the individual access provisions
of subsection (d) for the reasons noted above,
and therefore DHS is not required to establish
requirements, rules, or procedures with
respect to such access. Providing notice to
individuals with respect to existence of
records pertaining to them in the system of
records or otherwise setting up procedures
pursuant to which individuals may access
and view records pertaining to themselves in
the system would undermine investigative
efforts and reveal the identities of witnesses,
and potential witnesses, and confidential
informants.
Dated: May 15, 2009.
Mary Ellen Callahan,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of
Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. E9–11966 Filed 5–21–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111–97–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Agricultural Marketing Service
7 CFR Part 945
[Doc. No. AMS–FV–08–0062; FV08–945–1
PR]
Irish Potatoes Grown in Certain
Designated Counties in Idaho, and
Malheur County, OR and Imported Irish
Potatoes; Relaxation of Size
Requirements
AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
relax the size requirements for potatoes
handled under the marketing order for
Idaho-Eastern Oregon potatoes and for
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
long type potatoes imported into the
United States. This rule would revise
the size requirements to allow: Creamer
size (3⁄4 inch to 15⁄8 inches diameter) for
all varieties of potatoes to be handled if
the potatoes otherwise meet U.S. No. 1
grade; and round type potatoes to be
handled without regard to size so long
as the size is specified on the container
in connection with the grade. The
proposed changes are intended to
improve the handling and marketing of
Idaho-Eastern Oregon potatoes and
increase returns to producers. The
proposed changes would also allow the
importation of Creamer size long type
potatoes under regulations as authorized
by section 8e of the Agricultural
Marketing Agreement Act of 1937.
DATES: Comments must be received by
July 21, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Interested persons are
invited to submit written comments
concerning this proposal. Comments
should be sent to the Docket Clerk,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Fax: (202) 720–8938; or
Internet: https://www.regulations.gov. All
comments should reference the
document number and the date and
page number of this issue of the Federal
Register and will be available for public
inspection in the office of the Docket
Clerk during regular business hours, or
can be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov. All comments
submitted in response to this rule will
be included in the record and will be
made available to the public. Please be
advised that the identity of the
individuals or entities submitting the
comments will be made public on the
Internet at the address provided above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Barry Broadbent or Gary D. Olson,
Northwest Marketing Field Office,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1220 SW Third Avenue,
Suite 385, Portland, OR 97204;
Telephone: (503) 326–2724, Fax: (503)
326–7440, or E-mail:
Barry.Broadbent@usda.gov or
GaryD.Olson@usda.gov.
Small businesses may request
information on complying with this
regulation by contacting Jay Guerber,
Marketing Order Administration
Branch, Fruit and Vegetable Programs,
AMS, USDA, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., STOP 0237, Washington,
DC 20250–0237; Telephone: (202) 720–
2491, Fax: (202) 720–8938, or E-mail:
Jay.Guerber@usda.gov.
E:\FR\FM\22MYP1.SGM
22MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 98 (Friday, May 22, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23957-23958]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11966]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 98 / Friday, May 22, 2009 / Proposed
Rules
[[Page 23957]]
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Office of the Secretary
6 CFR Part 5
[Docket No. DHS-2009-0013]
Privacy Act of 1974: Implementation of Exemptions; U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services 009 Compliance Tracking and
Management System (CTMS)
AGENCY: Privacy Office, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is amending its
regulations to exempt portions of a system of records from certain
provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974. Specifically, DHS proposes to
exempt portions of the Compliance Tracking and Management System (CTMS)
from one or more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal,
civil and administrative enforcement requirements. CTMS is a system of
records that DHS will use to support the Verification Division of U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). CTMS collects and uses
information necessary for DHS to support monitoring and compliance
activities for researching and managing misuse, abuse, discrimination,
breach of privacy, and fraudulent use of information obtained through
two USCIS Verification Division programs: Systematic Alien Verification
for Entitlements (SAVE); and E-Verify.
DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 22, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number [DHS-
2009-0013] by one of the following methods:
Federal e-Rulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
Fax: 703-483-2999.
Mail: Mary Ellen Callahan, Chief Privacy Officer, Privacy
Office, Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the
agency name and docket number for this rulemaking. All comments
received will be posted without change to https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to read background
documents or comments received, go to https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general questions please contact:
Claire Stapleton (202-358-7777), Verification Division Privacy Branch
Chief, or Donald K. Hawkins (202-272-1400), Citizenship and Immigration
Services Privacy Officer, 20 Massachusetts Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20529. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, Department of
Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20529. For privacy issues please
contact: Mary Ellen Callahan (703-235-0780), Chief Privacy Officer,
Privacy Office, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Washington, DC
20528.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), elsewhere in
this edition of the Federal Register, published a Privacy Act system of
records notice describing records in the Compliance Tracking and
Management System (CTMS). This system of records is owned and operated
by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). CTMS collects and
uses information necessary to support monitoring and compliance for
researching and managing misuse, abuse, discrimination, breach of
privacy, and fraudulent use of USCIS Verification Division's
verification programs: (1) Systematic Alien Verification for
Entitlements (SAVE); and (2) E-Verify. SAVE and E-Verify are both
congressionally mandated programs for the verification of information
about an individual based on documents presented to either a government
agency or employer. E-Verify, formerly known as the Basic Pilot
Program, was established under the Illegal Immigration Reform and
Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Public Law 104-208 section 401, 8
U.S.C. 1324a note. SAVE was established under the Immigration and
Control Act of 1986, Public Law 100-360 section 121(c).The specifics of
the SAVE and E-Verify Program can be found on the DHS Web site and in
the Verification Information System (VIS) System of Records Notice
(SORN) and Privacy Impact Assessments (PIA). Congress further required
that DHS provide reasonable safeguards to prevent these programs from
misuse, abuse, discrimination, breach of privacy, and fraudulent use.
The Verification Division of USCIS has established a Monitoring and
Compliance Branch to monitor and research potential cases of misuse,
abuse, discrimination, breach of privacy, and fraudulent use. CTMS is
the system that supports this effort. DHS proposes to exempt portions
of the Compliance Tracking and Management System (CTMS) from one or
more provisions of the Privacy Act because of criminal, civil and
administrative enforcement requirements. The Privacy Act allows
Government agencies to exempt certain records from the access and
amendment provisions. If an agency claims an exemption, however, it
must issue a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) to make clear to the
public the reasons why a particular exemption is claimed.
In this NPRM, DHS now is proposing to exempt CTMS, in part, from
certain provisions of the Privacy Act. Some information in CTMS is
shared with and contributes to law enforcement activities of DHS
components and other Federal agencies. These exemptions are needed to
protect information relating to DHS activities from disclosure to
subjects or others related to these activities. Specifically, the
exemptions are required to preclude subjects of these activities from
frustrating USCIS monitoring and compliance processes and to avoid
disclosure of research techniques, as these processes and techniques
may inform law enforcement investigations. Disclosure of information to
the subject of the inquiry could also permit the subject to avoid
detection or apprehension.
The exemptions proposed here are standard law enforcement and
national security exemptions exercised by a large number of Federal law
enforcement and intelligence agencies. In appropriate circumstances,
where compliance would not appear to interfere with or adversely affect
the law enforcement purposes of this system and the overall
[[Page 23958]]
law enforcement process, the applicable exemptions may be waived.
List of Subjects in 6 CFR Part 5
Privacy, Freedom of information.
For the reasons stated in the preamble, DHS proposes to amend
Chapter I of Title 6, Code of Federal Regulations, as follows:
PART 5--DISCLOSURE OF RECORDS AND INFORMATION
1. The authority citation for part 5 continues to read as follows:
Authority: Pub. L. 107-296, 116 Stat. 2135, 6 U.S.C. 101 et
seq.; 5 U.S.C. 301. Subpart A also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552.
Subpart B also issued under 5 U.S.C. 552a.
2. Add at the end of Appendix C to Part 5, Exemption of Record
Systems under the Privacy Act, the following new paragraph 14:
Appendix C to Part 5--DHS Systems of Records Exempt From the Privacy
Act
* * * * *
14. The Department of Homeland Security Compliance Tracking and
Management System (CTMS) consists of electronic and paper files that
will be used by DHS and its components. This system of records will
be used to perform a range of information management and analytic
functions involving minimizing misuse, abuse, discrimination, breach
of privacy, and fraudulent use of SAVE and E-Verify. Pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 552a(k)(2) of the Privacy Act, this system is exempt from the
following provisions of the Privacy Act, subject to the limitations
set forth in those subsections: 5 U.S.C. 552a(c)(3), (d), (e)(1),
(e)(4)(G), (e)(4)(H), (e)(4)(I), and (f). Exemptions from these
particular subsections are justified, on a case-by-case basis to be
determined at the time a request is made, for the following reasons:
(a) From subsection (c)(3) (Accounting for Disclosures) because
release of the accounting of disclosures could alert the subject of
an investigation of an actual or potential criminal, civil, or
regulatory violation to the existence of the investigation, and
reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS as well as the
recipient agency. Disclosure of the accounting would therefore
present a serious impediment to law enforcement efforts and/or
efforts to preserve national security. Disclosure of the accounting
would also permit the individual who is the subject of a record to
impede the investigation, to tamper with witnesses or evidence, and
to avoid detection or apprehension, which would undermine the entire
investigative process.
(b) From subsection (d) (Access to Records) because access to
the records contained in this system of records could inform the
subject of an investigation of an actual or potential criminal,
civil, or regulatory violation, to the existence of the
investigation, and reveal investigative interest on the part of DHS
or another agency. Access to the records could permit the individual
who is the subject of a record to impede the investigation, to
tamper with witnesses or evidence, and to avoid detection or
apprehension. Amendment of the records could interfere with ongoing
investigations and law enforcement activities and would impose an
impossible administrative burden by requiring investigations to be
continuously reinvestigated. In addition, permitting access and
amendment to such information could disclose security-sensitive
information that could be detrimental to homeland security.
(c) From subsection (e)(1) (Relevancy and Necessity of
Information) because in the course of investigations into potential
violations of Federal law, the accuracy of information obtained or
introduced occasionally may be unclear or the information may not be
strictly relevant or necessary to a specific investigation. In the
interest of effective law enforcement, it is appropriate to retain
all information that may aid in establishing patterns of unlawful
activity.
(d) From subsections (e)(4)(G), (H), and (I) (Agency
Requirements), and (f) (Agency Rules) because portions of this
system are exempt from the individual access provisions of
subsection (d) for the reasons noted above, and therefore DHS is not
required to establish requirements, rules, or procedures with
respect to such access. Providing notice to individuals with respect
to existence of records pertaining to them in the system of records
or otherwise setting up procedures pursuant to which individuals may
access and view records pertaining to themselves in the system would
undermine investigative efforts and reveal the identities of
witnesses, and potential witnesses, and confidential informants.
Dated: May 15, 2009.
Mary Ellen Callahan,
Chief Privacy Officer, Department of Homeland Security.
[FR Doc. E9-11966 Filed 5-21-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-97-P