Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of Tapentadol Into Schedule II, 23790-23793 [E9-11933]
Download as PDF
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
23790
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 97 / Thursday, May 21, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
imports, exports, engages in research or
conducts instructional activities with
lacosamide, or who desires to
manufacture, distribute, dispense,
import, export, engage in instructional
activities or conduct research with
lacosamide, must be registered to
conduct such activities in accordance
with Part 1301 of Title 21 of the Code
of Federal Regulations (CFR). Any
person who is currently engaged in any
of the above activities and is not
registered with DEA must submit an
application for registration on or before
June 22, 2009 and may continue their
activities until the DEA has approved or
denied the application.
Security. Lacosamide is subject to
schedule III–V security requirements
and must be manufactured, distributed,
and stored in accordance with
§§ 1301.71, 1301.72(b), (c), and (d),
1301.73, 1301.74, 1301.75(b) and (c),
1301.76, and 1301.77 of Title 21 of the
CFR on and after June 22, 2009.
Labeling and Packaging. All labels
and labeling for commercial containers
of lacosamide which are distributed on
or after June 22, 2009 must comply with
requirements of §§ 1302.03–1302.07 of
Title 21 of the Code of Federal
Regulations.
Inventory. Every registrant required to
keep records and who possesses any
quantity of lacosamide must keep an
inventory of all stocks of lacosamide on
hand pursuant to §§ 1304.03, 1304.04
and 1304.11 of Title 21 of the CFR on
or after June 22, 2009. Every registrant
who desires registration in schedule V
for lacosamide must conduct an
inventory of all stocks of the substance
on hand at the time of registration.
Records. All registrants must keep
records pursuant to §§ 1304.03, 1304.04,
1304.21, 1304.22, and 1304.23 of Title
21 of the Code of Federal Regulations on
or after June 22, 2009.
Prescriptions. All prescriptions for
lacosamide pharmaceutical products
must be issued pursuant to 21 CFR
1306.03–1306.06 and 1306.21, 1306.23–
1306.27 on or after June 22, 2009.
Importation and Exportation. All
importation and exportation of
lacosamide must be in compliance with
part 1312 of Title 21 of the CFR on or
after June 22, 2009.
Criminal Liability. Any activity with
lacosamide not authorized by, or in
violation of, the CSA or the Controlled
Substances Import and Export Act
occurring on or after June 22, 2009 shall
be unlawful.
Regulatory Certifications
Executive Order 12866
In accordance with the provisions of
the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(a)), this action
VerDate Nov<24>2008
12:12 May 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
is a formal rulemaking ‘‘on the record
after opportunity for a hearing.’’ Such
proceedings are conducted pursuant to
the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557
and, as such, are exempt from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
pursuant to Executive Order 12866,
§ 3(d)(1).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Deputy Administrator, in
accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), has
reviewed this final rule and by
approving it certifies that it will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Lacosamide pharmaceutical products
will be prescription drugs used for the
treatment of partial-onset seizures.
Handlers of lacosamide often handle
other controlled substances used in the
treatment of central nervous system
disorders which are already subject to
the regulatory requirements of the CSA.
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable
standards set forth in §§ 3(a) and 3(b)(2)
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform.
based companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and
procedure, Drug traffic control,
Narcotics, Prescription drugs.
■ Under the authority vested in the
Attorney General by section 201(a) of
the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(a)), and
delegated to the Administrator of DEA
by Department of Justice regulations (28
CFR 0.100), and redelegated to the
Deputy Administrator pursuant to Title
28, Part 0, Appendix to Subpart R,
Section 12, the Deputy Administrator
hereby amends 21 CFR part 1308 as
follows:
PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
1. The authority citation for 21 CFR
part 1308 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b)
unless otherwise noted.
2. Section 1308.15 is amended by
revising paragraph (e)(1) and adding a
new paragraph (e)(2) to read as follows:
■
§ 1308.15
Schedule V.
Executive Order 13132
*
*
*
*
*
(e) * * *
(1) Lacosamide [(R)-2-acetoamido-Nbenzyl-3-methoxy-propionamide]—2746
(2) Pregabalin [(S)-3-(aminomethyl)-5methylhexanoic acid]—2782
This rulemaking does not preempt or
modify any provision of State law; nor
does it impose enforcement
responsibilities on any state; nor does it
diminish the power of any state to
enforce its own laws. Accordingly, this
rulemaking does not have federalism
implications warranting the application
of Executive Order 13132.
Dated: May 12, 2009.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9–11927 Filed 5–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by state, local and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $120,000,000 or more
(adjusted for inflation) in any one year,
and will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under
provisions of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by § 804 of the Small Business
Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996 (Congressional Review Act). This
rule will not result in an annual effect
on the economy of $100,000,000 or
more; a major increase in costs or prices:
or significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or on the
ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA–319F]
Schedules of Controlled Substances:
Placement of Tapentadol Into Schedule
II
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement
Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: With the issuance of this final
rule, the Deputy Administrator of the
Drug Enforcement Administration
(DEA) places the substance tapentadol,
including its isomers, esters, ethers,
salts and salts of isomers, esters and
ethers whenever the existence of such
isomers, esters, ethers, and salts is
possible, into schedule II of the
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 97 / Thursday, May 21, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
Controlled Substances Act (CSA). As a
result of this rule, the regulatory
controls and criminal sanctions of
schedule II will be applicable to the
manufacture, distribution, dispensing,
importation, and exportation of
tapentadol and products containing
tapentadol.
DATES: Effective Date: June 22, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christine A. Sannerud, PhD, Chief, Drug
and Chemical Evaluation Section, Office
of Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, 8701 Morrissette Drive,
Springfield, Virginia 22152, Telephone:
(202) 307–7183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 20, 2008, the Food and
Drug Administration (FDA) approved
tapentadol for marketing in the United
States as a prescription drug product for
the treatment of moderate-to-severe
acute pain. Tapentadol is a new
molecular entity with centrally-acting
analgesic properties.
Tapentadol has dual modes of action,
namely mu (μ) opioid receptor agonistic
action and inhibition of reuptake of
norepinephrine at the norepinephrine
transporter. The chemical name of its
monohydrochloride salt form is 3[(1R,2R)-3-(dimethylamino)-1-ethyl-2methylpropyl]phenol hydrochloride.
Tapentadol shares substantial
pharmacological effects and abuse
potential with other schedule II opioid
analgesics, e.g., morphine, oxycodone,
and hydromorphone.
Since tapentadol is a new molecular
entity, there has been no evidence of
diversion, abuse, or law enforcement
encounters involving the drug.
On November 13, 2008, the Assistant
Secretary for Health, Department of
Health and Human Services (DHHS),
sent the Deputy Administrator of DEA a
scientific and medical evaluation and a
letter recommending that tapentadol be
placed into schedule II of the CSA.
Enclosed with the November 13, 2008,
letter was a document prepared by the
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
entitled, ‘‘Basis for the Recommendation
for Control of Tapentadol in Schedule II
of the Controlled Substances Act.’’ The
document contained a review of the
factors which the CSA requires the
Secretary to consider (21 U.S.C. 811(b)).
After a review of the available data,
including the scientific and medical
evaluation and the scheduling
recommendation from DHHS, the
Deputy Administrator of the DEA
published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking entitled ‘‘Schedules of
Controlled Substances: Placement of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
12:12 May 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
Tapentadol into Schedule II’’ on
February 17, 2009 (74 FR 7386), which
proposed placement of tapentadol into
schedule II of the CSA. The proposed
rule provided an opportunity for all
interested persons to submit their
written comments on or before March
19, 2009.
Comments Received
The DEA received three comments in
response to the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking. One comment was from a
consulting firm, one comment was from
a concerned citizen, and the last
comment was from a company which
does research and development on
pharmaceutical drugs.
The first commenter recommended
that the DEA expedite the issuance and
effective date of the Final Rule placing
tapentadol in schedule II. The
commenter stated that tapentadol will
provide a safe and effective substitute
for other schedule II analgesics and that
the conditions of public health
necessitate and justify this request. In
response, DEA believes that providing
30 days for this rule to become effective
is both expeditious and sufficient to
allow handlers to apply for registration
with DEA and to comply with the
regulatory requirements for handling
schedule II controlled substances.
A second commenter stated that since
tapentadol induces effects similar to
oxycodone and morphine, both
schedule II substances, then it should be
placed in schedule II of the Controlled
Substances Act based on tapentadol’s
abuse potential. Thus, the commenter
agreed with DHHS’ recommendation
and the action proposed by DEA. No
response from DEA is necessary to this
comment because it is consistent with
the DEA’s final action.
The third commenter had four
questions/comments regarding the
implementation of this Final Rule. Each
question/comment is addressed below.
The commenter requested that DEA
registrants be allowed enough time to
make the changes needed to carry out
handling tapentadol as a schedule II
substance, as dictated in 21 CFR
1301.51, 1301.71, and 1304.04. In
response to this comment, the effective
date of the Final Rule placing
tapentadol in schedule II of the
Controlled Substances Act will be thirty
(30) days from the date of publication of
the Final Rule, thus allowing ample
time for those that wish to handle
tapentadol to meet DEA regulatory
requirements for handling schedule II
substances. It has been DEA’s
experience that this is sufficient time to
meet the regulatory requirements
provided below.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
23791
The commenter asked if quantities of
tapentadol held by a DEA registrant
would have to be reported once the
scheduling of tapentadol as a schedule
II substance was finalized. In response,
the reporting and recordkeeping
requirements for handling schedule II
substances can be found in 21 CFR part
1304. Specifically, 21 CFR 1304.11(b)
states that ‘‘Every person required to
keep records shall take an inventory of
all stocks of controlled substances on
hand on the date he/she first engages in
the manufacture, distribution, or
dispensing of controlled substances
* * *’’ In order for a manufacturer to
handle a schedule II substance, a
manufacturing or procurement quota
has to be requested in accordance with
the requirements of 21 U.S.C. 826(c) and
21 CFR part 1303. The manufacturer’s
inventory of the substance is used, in
part, to determine the manufacturer’s
quota.
The commenter asked about the
process for adding the CSA drug code
for tapentadol to their registration. In
response, the regulatory process
required to obtain a DEA registration is
outlined generally in 21 CFR 1301.11
through 1301.19, and the process
required to modify an existing DEA
registration is outlined in 21 CFR
1301.51. Information relating to
registration may be found on the
Internet, https://
www.DEAdiversion.usdoj.gov, or by
contacting DEA’s Registration Call
Center, toll free at 1–800–882–9539.
Finally, the commenter inquired
about the process for establishing an
NDC number for tapentadol with the
Automation of Reports and
Consolidated Orders System (ARCOS).
National Drug Code (NDC) numbers are
assigned by the Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) in conjunction
with registration and drug listing
requirements of the Federal Food, Drug,
and Cosmetic Act. Accordingly, a
person manufacturing a product
containing tapentadol must obtain an
NDC number from FDA in accordance
with 21 CFR 207.35. Once the drug code
for tapentadol is added to an existing
manufacturer’s registration or a new
registration is issued to an applicant,
then that DEA-registered manufacturer
must provide the DEA’s ARCOS Unit
with its established NDC number for
their product containing tapentadol.
Once that information is obtained, it can
be used to report ARCOS reportable
transactions pursuant to 21 CFR
1304.33.
Scheduling of Tapentadol
Based on the recommendation of the
Assistant Secretary for Health, received
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
23792
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 97 / Thursday, May 21, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
in accordance with § 201(b) of the Act
(21 U.S.C. 811(b)), and the independent
review of the available data by DEA, and
after a review of the comments received
in response to the Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, the Deputy Administrator
of DEA, pursuant to §§ 201(a) and 201(b)
of the Act (21 U.S.C. 811(a) and 811(b)),
finds that:
(1) Tapentadol has a high potential for
abuse;
(2) Tapentadol has a currently
accepted medical use in treatment in the
United States; and
(3) Abuse of tapentadol may lead to
severe psychological or physical
dependence.
Based on these findings, the Deputy
Administrator of DEA concludes that
tapentadol, including its isomers, esters,
ethers, salts and salts of isomers, esters
and ethers whenever the existence of
such isomers, esters, ethers, and salts is
possible, warrants control in schedule II
of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 812(b)(2)).
Requirements for Handling Tapentadol
Registration. Any person who
manufactures, distributes, dispenses,
imports, exports, engages in research or
conducts instructional activities with
tapentadol, or who desires to
manufacture, distribute, dispense,
import, export, engage in instructional
activities or conduct research with
tapentadol, must be registered to
conduct such activities in accordance
with part 1301 of Title 21 of the Code
of Federal Regulations. Any person who
is currently engaged in any of the above
activities and is not registered with DEA
must submit an application for
registration on or before June 22, 2009
and may continue their activities until
DEA has approved or denied that
application.
Security. Tapentadol is subject to
schedule II security requirements and
must be manufactured, distributed, and
stored in accordance with §§ 1301.71,
1301.72(a), (c), and (d), 1301.73,
1301.74, 1301.75(b) and (c), 1301.76 and
1301.77 of Title 21 of the Code of
Federal Regulations on or after June 22,
2009.
Labeling and Packaging. All labels
and labeling for commercial containers
of tapentadol must comply with
requirements of §§ 1302.03 through
1302.07 of Title 21 of the Code of
Federal Regulations on or after June 22,
2009.
Quotas. Quotas for tapentadol must be
established pursuant to part 1303 of
Title 21 of the Code of Federal
Regulations.
Inventory. Every registrant required to
keep records and who possesses any
quantity of tapentadol must keep an
VerDate Nov<24>2008
12:12 May 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
inventory of all stocks of tapentadol on
hand pursuant to §§ 1304.03, 1304.04
and 1304.11 of Title 21 of the Code of
Federal Regulations on or after June 22,
2009. Every registrant who desires
registration in schedule II for tapentadol
must conduct an inventory of all stocks
of the substance on hand at the time of
registration.
Records. All registrants must keep
records pursuant to §§ 1304.03, 1304.04,
1304.21, 1304.22, and 1304.23 of Title
21 of the Code of Federal Regulations on
or after June 22, 2009.
Reports. All registrants required to
submit reports to the Automation of
Reports and Consolidated Order System
(ARCOS) in accordance with § 1304.33
of Title 21 of the Code of Federal
Regulations must do so for tapentadol.
Orders for Tapentadol. All registrants
involved in the distribution of
tapentadol must comply with the order
form requirements of part 1305 of Title
21 of the Code of Federal Regulations on
or after June 22, 2009.
Prescriptions. All prescriptions for
tapentadol or prescriptions for products
containing tapentadol must be issued
pursuant to §§ 1306.03 through 1306.06
and 1306.11 through 1306.15 of Title 21
of the Code of Federal Regulations on
and after June 22, 2009.
Importation and Exportation. All
importation and exportation of
tapentadol must be in compliance with
part 1312 of Title 21 of the Code of
Federal Regulations on or after June 22,
2009.
Criminal Liability. Any activity with
tapentadol not authorized by, or in
violation of, the CSA or the Controlled
Substances Import and Export Act shall
be unlawful on or after June 22, 2009.
Regulatory Certifications
Executive Order 12866
In accordance with the provisions of
the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(a)), this action
is a formal rulemaking ‘‘on the record
after opportunity for a hearing.’’ Such
proceedings are conducted pursuant to
the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557
and, as such, are exempt from review by
the Office of Management and Budget
pursuant to Executive Order 12866,
section 3(d)(1).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Deputy Administrator, in
accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), has
reviewed this final rule and by
approving it certifies that it will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Tapentadol products will be
prescription drugs used for the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
treatment of moderate-to-severe acute
pain. Handlers of tapentadol also handle
other controlled substances used to treat
pain which are already subject to the
regulatory requirements of the CSA.
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable
standards set forth in Sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 Civil
Justice Reform.
Executive Order 13132
This rulemaking does not preempt or
modify any provision of State law; nor
does it impose enforcement
responsibilities on any State; nor does it
diminish the power of any State to
enforce its own laws. Accordingly, this
rulemaking does not have federalism
implications warranting the application
of Executive Order 13132.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the
expenditure by State, local and Tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $120,000,000 or more
(adjusted for inflation) in any one year,
and will not significantly or uniquely
affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under
provisions of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule as
defined by section 804 of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Congressional
Review Act). This rule will not result in
an annual effect on the economy of
$100,000,000 or more; a major increase
in costs or prices; or significant adverse
effects on competition, employment,
investment, productivity, innovation, or
on the ability of United States-based
companies to compete with foreign
based companies in domestic and
export markets.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and
procedure, Drug traffic control,
Narcotics, Prescription drugs.
Under the authority vested in the
Attorney General by section 201(a) of
the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(a)), and
delegated to the Administrator of DEA
by Department of Justice regulations (28
CFR 0.100), and redelegated to the
Deputy Administrator pursuant to Title
28, Part 0, Appendix to Subpart R,
Section 12, the Deputy Administrator
hereby amends 21 CFR part 1308 as
follows:
■
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 97 / Thursday, May 21, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
■ 1. The authority citation for part 1308
through Friday, except Federal holidays.
continues to read as follows:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b),
you have questions on this rule, call or
unless otherwise noted.
e-mail CDR Joseph Snowden,
Prevention Department, Sector Detroit,
■ 2. Section 1308.12 is amended in the
Coast Guard; telephone (313) 568–9580,
table by adding a new paragraph (c)(28)
e-mail Joseph.H.Snowden@uscg.mil. If
to read as follows:
you have questions on viewing the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
§ 1308.12 Schedule II.
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
*
*
*
*
*
202–366–9826.
(c) * * *
(28) Tapentadol .................................
9780 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
*
*
*
*
*
On April 16, 2009, we published a
Dated: May 15, 2009.
notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM)
Michele M. Leonhart,
entitled Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Race,
Deputy Administrator.
Detroit River, Detroit, MI in the Federal
[FR Doc. E9–11933 Filed 5–20–09; 8:45 am]
Register (74 FR 17627). We received one
BILLING CODE 4410–09–P
comment on the proposed rule. No
public meeting was requested, and none
was held.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), the Coast
SECURITY
Guard finds that good cause exists for
making this rule effective less than 30
Coast Guard
days after publication in the Federal
Register. Delaying this rule would be
33 CFR Part 165
contrary to the public interest of
ensuring, to the extent practicable, the
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0089]
safety and security of the spectators and
RIN 1625–AA00
participants during this event and
immediate action is necessary to
Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Race, Detroit prevent possible injury, loss of life, or
River, Detroit, MI
property.
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
Background and Purpose
ACTION: Temporary final rule.
This temporary safety zone is
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES
PART 1308—SCHEDULES OF
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the Detroit River, Detroit, Michigan.
This zone will restrict vessels from
portions of the Detroit River during the
Red Bull Air Race. This temporary
safety zone is necessary to protect
spectators and vessels from the hazards
associated with air races.
DATES: This rule is effective from 9 a.m.
on June 11, 2009 through 6:30 p.m. on
June 14, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments and material
received from the public, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, are part
of docket USCG–2009–0089 and are
available online by going to https://
www.regulations.gov, selecting the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, inserting USCG–
2009–0089 in the Docket ID box,
pressing Enter, and then clicking on the
item in the Docket ID column. This
material is also available for inspection
or copying at the Docket Management
Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
VerDate Nov<24>2008
12:12 May 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
necessary to ensure, to the extent
practicable, the safety of vessels and
spectators from hazards associated with
an air race. The Captain of the Port
Detroit has determined air races in close
proximity to watercraft and
infrastructure pose significant risk to
public safety and property. The likely
combination of large numbers of
recreation vessels, possible alcohol use,
airplanes traveling at high speeds and
performing aerial acrobatics, and large
numbers of spectators in close
proximity to the water could easily
result in serious injuries or fatalities.
Establishing a safety zone around the
location of the race course will help
ensure the safety of persons and
property at these events and help
minimize the associated risks.
Discussion of Comments and Changes
We received one letter, containing
several comments on this rulemaking.
First, the commenter stated that closure
of the Detroit River for these air races
violates the Boundary Waters Treaty of
1909. The Coast Guard disagrees that
the Coast Guard’s action or the action by
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
23793
Canada violates this treaty. The
Boundary Waters Treaty does guarantee
that ‘‘navigation of all navigable
boundary waters’’ shall be ‘‘free and
open’’ to ‘‘inhabitants * * * ships,
vessels, and boats’’ of both the United
States and Canada, ‘‘subject, however, to
any laws and regulations of either
country.’’ Both the United States and
Canada have determined, pursuant to
each country’s laws and regulations,
that brief closures of the Detroit River
are reasonably necessary to protect
spectators and vessels from hazards
associated with these air races.
Moreover, under fundamental
principles of international law, only the
States that are a party to an international
agreement are generally entitled to
allege a breach of the terms of the
agreement by the other. For this event,
Canada has also agreed that a closure of
a small portion of the river for a short
period of time is a reasonable and
necessary measure.
Second, the commenter stated that the
proposed rule constituted a ‘‘public
taking’’ in contravention of the Fifth
Amendment to the United States
Constitution; in that vessel owners will
experience delays that will result in lost
profits. This commenter did not put
forward any specific company or vessel
that would be so affected. The Coast
Guard disagrees with this comment. In
general, a ‘‘taking’’ occurs when a
governmental entity uses its powers to
permanently deprive a person or entity
of property. The Captain of the Port has
considered the needs of port
stakeholders and the maritime
community and has determined that
this safety zone is necessary to protect
the public and maintain safety of
navigation. Further, the rule is only
temporary in nature, not permanent,
and in the event that this temporary
safety zone affects shipping, commercial
vessels may request permission from the
Captain of the Port Detroit to transit
through the safety zone. Moreover, the
safety zone will only be enforced for a
short period of time on the enforcement
dates. Lastly, the Coast Guard believes
vessel owners have had sufficient
advance notice of this safety zone, such
that they should be able to work vessel
schedules around the enforcement
periods of the proposed safety zone to
minimize or avoid lost profits.
Third, the commenter stated that the
race sponsor must be required to agree
in advance to reasonably compensate
vessel owners for losses incurred by
delays and post a bond sufficient to
cover anticipated vessel losses.
Otherwise, this commenter stated, there
is no incentive for race organizers to
work collaboratively with vessel
E:\FR\FM\21MYR1.SGM
21MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 97 (Thursday, May 21, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23790-23793]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11933]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
21 CFR Part 1308
[Docket No. DEA-319F]
Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of Tapentadol Into
Schedule II
AGENCY: Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Justice.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: With the issuance of this final rule, the Deputy Administrator
of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) places the substance
tapentadol, including its isomers, esters, ethers, salts and salts of
isomers, esters and ethers whenever the existence of such isomers,
esters, ethers, and salts is possible, into schedule II of the
[[Page 23791]]
Controlled Substances Act (CSA). As a result of this rule, the
regulatory controls and criminal sanctions of schedule II will be
applicable to the manufacture, distribution, dispensing, importation,
and exportation of tapentadol and products containing tapentadol.
DATES: Effective Date: June 22, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christine A. Sannerud, PhD, Chief,
Drug and Chemical Evaluation Section, Office of Diversion Control, Drug
Enforcement Administration, 8701 Morrissette Drive, Springfield,
Virginia 22152, Telephone: (202) 307-7183.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On November 20, 2008, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
approved tapentadol for marketing in the United States as a
prescription drug product for the treatment of moderate-to-severe acute
pain. Tapentadol is a new molecular entity with centrally-acting
analgesic properties.
Tapentadol has dual modes of action, namely mu ([mu]) opioid
receptor agonistic action and inhibition of reuptake of norepinephrine
at the norepinephrine transporter. The chemical name of its
monohydrochloride salt form is 3-[(1R,2R)-3-(dimethylamino)-1-ethyl-2-
methylpropyl]phenol hydrochloride. Tapentadol shares substantial
pharmacological effects and abuse potential with other schedule II
opioid analgesics, e.g., morphine, oxycodone, and hydromorphone.
Since tapentadol is a new molecular entity, there has been no
evidence of diversion, abuse, or law enforcement encounters involving
the drug.
On November 13, 2008, the Assistant Secretary for Health,
Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS), sent the Deputy
Administrator of DEA a scientific and medical evaluation and a letter
recommending that tapentadol be placed into schedule II of the CSA.
Enclosed with the November 13, 2008, letter was a document prepared by
the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) entitled, ``Basis for the
Recommendation for Control of Tapentadol in Schedule II of the
Controlled Substances Act.'' The document contained a review of the
factors which the CSA requires the Secretary to consider (21 U.S.C.
811(b)).
After a review of the available data, including the scientific and
medical evaluation and the scheduling recommendation from DHHS, the
Deputy Administrator of the DEA published a Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking entitled ``Schedules of Controlled Substances: Placement of
Tapentadol into Schedule II'' on February 17, 2009 (74 FR 7386), which
proposed placement of tapentadol into schedule II of the CSA. The
proposed rule provided an opportunity for all interested persons to
submit their written comments on or before March 19, 2009.
Comments Received
The DEA received three comments in response to the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking. One comment was from a consulting firm, one
comment was from a concerned citizen, and the last comment was from a
company which does research and development on pharmaceutical drugs.
The first commenter recommended that the DEA expedite the issuance
and effective date of the Final Rule placing tapentadol in schedule II.
The commenter stated that tapentadol will provide a safe and effective
substitute for other schedule II analgesics and that the conditions of
public health necessitate and justify this request. In response, DEA
believes that providing 30 days for this rule to become effective is
both expeditious and sufficient to allow handlers to apply for
registration with DEA and to comply with the regulatory requirements
for handling schedule II controlled substances.
A second commenter stated that since tapentadol induces effects
similar to oxycodone and morphine, both schedule II substances, then it
should be placed in schedule II of the Controlled Substances Act based
on tapentadol's abuse potential. Thus, the commenter agreed with DHHS'
recommendation and the action proposed by DEA. No response from DEA is
necessary to this comment because it is consistent with the DEA's final
action.
The third commenter had four questions/comments regarding the
implementation of this Final Rule. Each question/comment is addressed
below.
The commenter requested that DEA registrants be allowed enough time
to make the changes needed to carry out handling tapentadol as a
schedule II substance, as dictated in 21 CFR 1301.51, 1301.71, and
1304.04. In response to this comment, the effective date of the Final
Rule placing tapentadol in schedule II of the Controlled Substances Act
will be thirty (30) days from the date of publication of the Final
Rule, thus allowing ample time for those that wish to handle tapentadol
to meet DEA regulatory requirements for handling schedule II
substances. It has been DEA's experience that this is sufficient time
to meet the regulatory requirements provided below.
The commenter asked if quantities of tapentadol held by a DEA
registrant would have to be reported once the scheduling of tapentadol
as a schedule II substance was finalized. In response, the reporting
and recordkeeping requirements for handling schedule II substances can
be found in 21 CFR part 1304. Specifically, 21 CFR 1304.11(b) states
that ``Every person required to keep records shall take an inventory of
all stocks of controlled substances on hand on the date he/she first
engages in the manufacture, distribution, or dispensing of controlled
substances * * *'' In order for a manufacturer to handle a schedule II
substance, a manufacturing or procurement quota has to be requested in
accordance with the requirements of 21 U.S.C. 826(c) and 21 CFR part
1303. The manufacturer's inventory of the substance is used, in part,
to determine the manufacturer's quota.
The commenter asked about the process for adding the CSA drug code
for tapentadol to their registration. In response, the regulatory
process required to obtain a DEA registration is outlined generally in
21 CFR 1301.11 through 1301.19, and the process required to modify an
existing DEA registration is outlined in 21 CFR 1301.51. Information
relating to registration may be found on the Internet, https://www.DEAdiversion.usdoj.gov, or by contacting DEA's Registration Call
Center, toll free at 1-800-882-9539.
Finally, the commenter inquired about the process for establishing
an NDC number for tapentadol with the Automation of Reports and
Consolidated Orders System (ARCOS). National Drug Code (NDC) numbers
are assigned by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in conjunction
with registration and drug listing requirements of the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Accordingly, a person manufacturing a product
containing tapentadol must obtain an NDC number from FDA in accordance
with 21 CFR 207.35. Once the drug code for tapentadol is added to an
existing manufacturer's registration or a new registration is issued to
an applicant, then that DEA-registered manufacturer must provide the
DEA's ARCOS Unit with its established NDC number for their product
containing tapentadol. Once that information is obtained, it can be
used to report ARCOS reportable transactions pursuant to 21 CFR
1304.33.
Scheduling of Tapentadol
Based on the recommendation of the Assistant Secretary for Health,
received
[[Page 23792]]
in accordance with Sec. 201(b) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 811(b)), and the
independent review of the available data by DEA, and after a review of
the comments received in response to the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking,
the Deputy Administrator of DEA, pursuant to Sec. Sec. 201(a) and
201(b) of the Act (21 U.S.C. 811(a) and 811(b)), finds that:
(1) Tapentadol has a high potential for abuse;
(2) Tapentadol has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in
the United States; and
(3) Abuse of tapentadol may lead to severe psychological or
physical dependence.
Based on these findings, the Deputy Administrator of DEA concludes
that tapentadol, including its isomers, esters, ethers, salts and salts
of isomers, esters and ethers whenever the existence of such isomers,
esters, ethers, and salts is possible, warrants control in schedule II
of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 812(b)(2)).
Requirements for Handling Tapentadol
Registration. Any person who manufactures, distributes, dispenses,
imports, exports, engages in research or conducts instructional
activities with tapentadol, or who desires to manufacture, distribute,
dispense, import, export, engage in instructional activities or conduct
research with tapentadol, must be registered to conduct such activities
in accordance with part 1301 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal
Regulations. Any person who is currently engaged in any of the above
activities and is not registered with DEA must submit an application
for registration on or before June 22, 2009 and may continue their
activities until DEA has approved or denied that application.
Security. Tapentadol is subject to schedule II security
requirements and must be manufactured, distributed, and stored in
accordance with Sec. Sec. 1301.71, 1301.72(a), (c), and (d), 1301.73,
1301.74, 1301.75(b) and (c), 1301.76 and 1301.77 of Title 21 of the
Code of Federal Regulations on or after June 22, 2009.
Labeling and Packaging. All labels and labeling for commercial
containers of tapentadol must comply with requirements of Sec. Sec.
1302.03 through 1302.07 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations
on or after June 22, 2009.
Quotas. Quotas for tapentadol must be established pursuant to part
1303 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations.
Inventory. Every registrant required to keep records and who
possesses any quantity of tapentadol must keep an inventory of all
stocks of tapentadol on hand pursuant to Sec. Sec. 1304.03, 1304.04
and 1304.11 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations on or after
June 22, 2009. Every registrant who desires registration in schedule II
for tapentadol must conduct an inventory of all stocks of the substance
on hand at the time of registration.
Records. All registrants must keep records pursuant to Sec. Sec.
1304.03, 1304.04, 1304.21, 1304.22, and 1304.23 of Title 21 of the Code
of Federal Regulations on or after June 22, 2009.
Reports. All registrants required to submit reports to the
Automation of Reports and Consolidated Order System (ARCOS) in
accordance with Sec. 1304.33 of Title 21 of the Code of Federal
Regulations must do so for tapentadol.
Orders for Tapentadol. All registrants involved in the distribution
of tapentadol must comply with the order form requirements of part 1305
of Title 21 of the Code of Federal Regulations on or after June 22,
2009.
Prescriptions. All prescriptions for tapentadol or prescriptions
for products containing tapentadol must be issued pursuant to
Sec. Sec. 1306.03 through 1306.06 and 1306.11 through 1306.15 of Title
21 of the Code of Federal Regulations on and after June 22, 2009.
Importation and Exportation. All importation and exportation of
tapentadol must be in compliance with part 1312 of Title 21 of the Code
of Federal Regulations on or after June 22, 2009.
Criminal Liability. Any activity with tapentadol not authorized by,
or in violation of, the CSA or the Controlled Substances Import and
Export Act shall be unlawful on or after June 22, 2009.
Regulatory Certifications
Executive Order 12866
In accordance with the provisions of the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(a)),
this action is a formal rulemaking ``on the record after opportunity
for a hearing.'' Such proceedings are conducted pursuant to the
provisions of 5 U.S.C. 556 and 557 and, as such, are exempt from review
by the Office of Management and Budget pursuant to Executive Order
12866, section 3(d)(1).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Deputy Administrator, in accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), has reviewed this final rule and by
approving it certifies that it will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. Tapentadol products
will be prescription drugs used for the treatment of moderate-to-severe
acute pain. Handlers of tapentadol also handle other controlled
substances used to treat pain which are already subject to the
regulatory requirements of the CSA.
Executive Order 12988
This regulation meets the applicable standards set forth in
Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988 Civil Justice
Reform.
Executive Order 13132
This rulemaking does not preempt or modify any provision of State
law; nor does it impose enforcement responsibilities on any State; nor
does it diminish the power of any State to enforce its own laws.
Accordingly, this rulemaking does not have federalism implications
warranting the application of Executive Order 13132.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
This rule will not result in the expenditure by State, local and
Tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of
$120,000,000 or more (adjusted for inflation) in any one year, and will
not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. Therefore, no
actions were deemed necessary under provisions of the Unfunded Mandates
Reform Act of 1995.
Congressional Review Act
This rule is not a major rule as defined by section 804 of the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996
(Congressional Review Act). This rule will not result in an annual
effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; a major increase in
costs or prices; or significant adverse effects on competition,
employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of
United States-based companies to compete with foreign based companies
in domestic and export markets.
List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 1308
Administrative practice and procedure, Drug traffic control,
Narcotics, Prescription drugs.
0
Under the authority vested in the Attorney General by section 201(a) of
the CSA (21 U.S.C. 811(a)), and delegated to the Administrator of DEA
by Department of Justice regulations (28 CFR 0.100), and redelegated to
the Deputy Administrator pursuant to Title 28, Part 0, Appendix to
Subpart R, Section 12, the Deputy Administrator hereby amends 21 CFR
part 1308 as follows:
[[Page 23793]]
PART 1308--SCHEDULES OF CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES
0
1. The authority citation for part 1308 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 21 U.S.C. 811, 812, 871(b), unless otherwise noted.
0
2. Section 1308.12 is amended in the table by adding a new paragraph
(c)(28) to read as follows:
Sec. 1308.12 Schedule II.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(28) Tapentadol................................................. 9780
* * * * *
Dated: May 15, 2009.
Michele M. Leonhart,
Deputy Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9-11933 Filed 5-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4410-09-P