Extension of Port Limits of St. Louis, MO, 23110-23111 [E9-11538]

Download as PDF 23110 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 94 / Monday, May 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations Federal Aviation Administration 14 CFR Part 39 [Docket No. FAA–2008–0731; Directorate Identifier 2008–NM–058–AD; Amendment 39–15812; AD 2009–04–06] RIN 2120–AA64 Airworthiness Directives; Boeing Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747–100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 747–400, 747–400D, 747– 400F, 747SR, and 747SP Series Airplanes AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), Department of Transportation (DOT). ACTION: Final rule; correction. SUMMARY: The FAA is correcting typographical errors in an existing airworthiness directive (AD) that was published previously in the Federal Register. The error resulted in two incorrect paragraph references. This AD applies to certain Boeing Model 747– 100, 747–100B, 747–100B SUD, 747– 200B, 747–200C, 747–200F, 747–300, 747–400, 747–400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes. This AD requires repetitive detailed inspections of the aft pressure bulkhead for indications of ‘‘oil cans’’ and previous oil can repairs at reduced compliance times, and corrective actions if necessary. Effective April 2, 2009. You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at http:// www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Management Facility between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The AD docket contains this AD, the regulatory evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The address for the Docket Office (telephone 800–647–5527) is the Document Management Facility, U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M–30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ivan Li, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe Branch, ANM–120S, FAA, Seattle Aircraft Certification Office, 1601 Lind Avenue, SW., Renton, Washington 98057–3356; telephone (425) 917–6437; fax (425) 917–6590. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On January 29, 2009, the FAA issued AD 2009–04–06, amendment 39–15812 (74 FR 8719, February 26, 2009), for certain DATES: cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES ADDRESSES: VerDate Nov<24>2008 13:54 May 15, 2009 Jkt 217001 Boeing Model 747–100, 747–100B, 747– 100B SUD, 747–200B, 747–200C, 747– 200F, 747–300, 747–400, 747–400D, 747–400F, 747SR, and 747SP series airplanes. This AD requires repetitive detailed inspections of the aft pressure bulkhead for indications of ‘‘oil cans’’ and previous oil can repairs at reduced compliance times, and corrective actions if necessary. As published, there are two locations in the AD that reference an incorrect paragraph identifier. No other part of the regulatory information has been changed; therefore, the final rule is not republished in the Federal Register. The effective date of this AD remains April 2, 2009. (DHS) regulations pertaining to Customs and Border Protection’s (CBP’s) field organization by extending the geographical limits of the port of St. Louis, Missouri to include the entire expanded Lambert-St. Louis International Airport. The change is part of CBP’s continuing program to more efficiently utilize its personnel, facilities, and resources, and to provide better service to carriers, importers, and the general public. DATES: Effective Date: June 17, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy M. Cooper, Office of Field Operations, 202–344–2057. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: § 39.13 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Bureau of Customs and Border Protection In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal Register (71 FR 47156) on August 16, 2006, CBP proposed to amend the list of CBP ports of entry at 19 CFR 101.3(b)(1) to extend the geographical limits of the St. Louis, Missouri port of entry. The current port limits of the St. Louis, Missouri, port of entry are described in Treasury Decision (T.D.) 69–224, effective September 27, 1969. In the NPRM, CBP explained that the Lambert-St. Louis International Airport was located within the boundaries of these port limits. However, at the time the NPRM was published, the airport had initiated an expansion project, which, when completed, would place part of the airport outside of the port’s current boundaries. Accordingly, so that the entire airport would be within the port’s boundaries and to make the boundaries more easily identifiable to the public, CBP proposed to extend the port limits of the port of St. Louis, Missouri in such a way that would align the port boundaries with the Federal Interstate Highways that encircle the St. Louis metropolitan area. CBP determined that this proposed change in the boundaries of the port of St. Louis, Missouri, would not result in a change in the service that is provided to the public by the port, nor would it require a change in the staffing or workload at the port. 19 CFR Part 101 II. Analysis of Comments and Conclusion [Corrected] In the Federal Register of February 26, 2009, on page 8721, in the first column, paragraph (i) of AD 2009–04– 06 is corrected to read as follows: * * * * * (i) If no crack is found during the eddy current inspection required by paragraph (h) of this AD, do the actions specified in paragraph (i)(1) or (i)(2) of this AD, as applicable. * * * * * In the Federal Register of February 26, 2009, on page 8721, in the second column, paragraph (j)(1) of AD 2009– 04–06 is corrected to read as follows: * * * * * (1) If no crack and no oil can are found, repeat the detailed inspection in accordance with paragraph (g) of this AD. * * * * * Issued in Renton, Washington, on May 6, 2009. Ali Bahrami, Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service. [FR Doc. E9–11280 Filed 5–15–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–13–P DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY [USCBP–2005–0035; CBP Dec. 09–16] Extension of Port Limits of St. Louis, MO AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection, DHS. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: This document amends the Department of Homeland Security PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 I. Background CBP did not receive any comments in response to the NPRM. With the expansion of the airport being completed as scheduled, CBP is extending the geographical limits of the port of St. Louis, Missouri, as proposed in the NPRM. CBP believes that the inclusion of the entire airport within the port limits and alignment of the port boundaries with the Federal Interstate E:\FR\FM\18MYR1.SGM 18MYR1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 94 / Monday, May 18, 2009 / Rules and Regulations highways that encircle the St. Louis area will enable CBP to more efficiently utilize its personnel, facilities, and resources, and to provide better service to carriers, importers, and the general public. The port of entry description of St. Louis, Missouri, will be revised as proposed in the NPRM. III. Port Description of St. Louis, Missouri The port limits of St. Louis, Missouri, are as follows: Beginning at the point where Federal Interstate Highway 270 crosses the Mississippi River; thence west, southwest, south and southeast, along Federal Interstate Highway 270 to the point where it becomes Federal Interstate Highway 255; thence southeast on Federal Interstate Highway 255 across the Mississippi River; thence north and east to the point where Federal Interstate Highway 255 intersects with Federal Interstate Highway 270; thence west along Federal Interstate Highway 270 to the Mississippi River, the point of beginning. IV. Authority This change is made under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 2, 66, and 1624; and 6 U.S.C. 203. cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with RULES B. Regulatory Flexibility Act The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires Federal agencies to examine the impact a rule would have on small entities. A small entity may be a small business (defined as any independently owned and operated business not dominant in its field that qualifies as a small business per the Small Business Act), a small notfor-profit organization, or a small governmental jurisdiction (locality with fewer than 50,000 people). This rule does not directly regulate small entities. The change is part of CBP’s continuing program to more Jkt 217001 The signing authority for this document falls under 19 CFR 0.2(a), because the port extension is not within the bounds of those regulations for which the Secretary of the Treasury has retained sole authority. Accordingly, this final rule may be signed by the Secretary of Homeland Security (or his or her delegate). Customs duties and inspection, Customs ports of entry, Exports, Imports, Organization and functions (Government agencies). A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review This rule is not considered to be an economically significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, because it will not result in the expenditure of over $100 million in any one year. The change is intended to expand the geographical boundaries of the Port of St. Louis, Missouri, and make it more easily identifiable to the public. There are no new costs to the public associated with this rule. Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866. 13:54 May 15, 2009 VI. Signing Authority List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 101 V. Statutory and Regulatory Reviews VerDate Nov<24>2008 efficiently utilize its personnel, facilities, and resources, and to provide better service to carriers, importers, and the general public. To the extent that all entities are able to more efficiently or conveniently access the facilities and resources within the expanded geographical area of the new port limits, this rule should confer benefits to CBP, carriers, importers, and the general public. Because this rule does not directly regulate small entities, CBP certifies that this rule does not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. Amendments to CBP Regulations For the reasons set forth above, part 101, CBP Regulations (19 CFR part 101) are amended as set forth below. ■ PART 101—GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. The general authority citation for part 101 and the specific authority citation for section 101.3 continue to read as follows: ■ Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 2, 66, 1202 (General Note 3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1623, 1624, 1646a. Sections 101.3 and 101.4 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1 and 58b; * * * * * 2. In the list of ports in section 101.3(b)(1), under the State of Missouri, the ‘‘Limits of port’’ column adjacent to ‘‘St. Louis’’ in the ‘‘Ports of entry’’ column is amended by removing the language ‘‘Including territory described in T.D.s 67–57 and 69–224’’ and adding in its place ‘‘CBP Dec. 09–16.’’ ■ Dated: May 13, 2009. Janet Napolitano, Secretary. [FR Doc. E9–11538 Filed 5–15–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 9111–14–P PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 23111 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY Office of Foreign Assets Control 31 CFR Part 596 Terrorism List Governments Sanctions Regulations AGENCY: Office of Foreign Assets Control, Treasury. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: The Office of Foreign Assets Control of the U.S. Department of the Treasury (‘‘OFAC’’) is amending the Terrorism List Governments Sanctions Regulations so that the schedule to which a prohibition section refers lists those countries that are currently designated as supporting international terrorism, instead of the countries that were designated as of the effective date of these regulations. This amendment also removes Iraq, Libya, and North Korea from the schedule, because these countries are no longer designated as state sponsors of terrorism. DATES: Effective Date: May 18, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Assistant Director for Compliance, Outreach & Implementation, tel.: 202/ 622–2490, Assistant Director for Licensing, tel.: 202/622–2480, Assistant Director for Policy, tel.: 202/622–4855, Office of Foreign Assets Control, or Chief Counsel (Foreign Assets Control), tel.: 202/622–2410, Office of the General Counsel, Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC 20220 (not toll free numbers). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Electronic and Facsimile Availability This document and additional information concerning OFAC are available from OFAC’s Web site (http://www.treas.gov/ofac) or via facsimile through a 24-hour fax-ondemand service, tel.: 202/622–0077. Background Section 321 of the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, 18 U.S.C. 2332d (the ‘‘Act’’), makes it a criminal offense for United States persons, except as provided in regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury in consultation with the Secretary of State, to engage in financial transactions with the governments of countries designated under section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act of 1979, 50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j) (the ‘‘EAA’’), as supporting international terrorism. To implement section 321 of the Act, OFAC promulgated the Terrorism List Governments Sanctions Regulations, 31 CFR part 596 (the E:\FR\FM\18MYR1.SGM 18MYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 94 (Monday, May 18, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 23110-23111]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11538]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Bureau of Customs and Border Protection

19 CFR Part 101

[USCBP-2005-0035; CBP Dec. 09-16]


Extension of Port Limits of St. Louis, MO

AGENCY: Customs and Border Protection, DHS.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document amends the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) 
regulations pertaining to Customs and Border Protection's (CBP's) field 
organization by extending the geographical limits of the port of St. 
Louis, Missouri to include the entire expanded Lambert-St. Louis 
International Airport. The change is part of CBP's continuing program 
to more efficiently utilize its personnel, facilities, and resources, 
and to provide better service to carriers, importers, and the general 
public.

DATES: Effective Date: June 17, 2009.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wendy M. Cooper, Office of Field 
Operations, 202-344-2057.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

I. Background

    In a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) published in the Federal 
Register (71 FR 47156) on August 16, 2006, CBP proposed to amend the 
list of CBP ports of entry at 19 CFR 101.3(b)(1) to extend the 
geographical limits of the St. Louis, Missouri port of entry.
    The current port limits of the St. Louis, Missouri, port of entry 
are described in Treasury Decision (T.D.) 69-224, effective September 
27, 1969. In the NPRM, CBP explained that the Lambert-St. Louis 
International Airport was located within the boundaries of these port 
limits. However, at the time the NPRM was published, the airport had 
initiated an expansion project, which, when completed, would place part 
of the airport outside of the port's current boundaries. Accordingly, 
so that the entire airport would be within the port's boundaries and to 
make the boundaries more easily identifiable to the public, CBP 
proposed to extend the port limits of the port of St. Louis, Missouri 
in such a way that would align the port boundaries with the Federal 
Interstate Highways that encircle the St. Louis metropolitan area. CBP 
determined that this proposed change in the boundaries of the port of 
St. Louis, Missouri, would not result in a change in the service that 
is provided to the public by the port, nor would it require a change in 
the staffing or workload at the port.

II. Analysis of Comments and Conclusion

    CBP did not receive any comments in response to the NPRM. With the 
expansion of the airport being completed as scheduled, CBP is extending 
the geographical limits of the port of St. Louis, Missouri, as proposed 
in the NPRM. CBP believes that the inclusion of the entire airport 
within the port limits and alignment of the port boundaries with the 
Federal Interstate

[[Page 23111]]

highways that encircle the St. Louis area will enable CBP to more 
efficiently utilize its personnel, facilities, and resources, and to 
provide better service to carriers, importers, and the general public. 
The port of entry description of St. Louis, Missouri, will be revised 
as proposed in the NPRM.

III. Port Description of St. Louis, Missouri

    The port limits of St. Louis, Missouri, are as follows: Beginning 
at the point where Federal Interstate Highway 270 crosses the 
Mississippi River; thence west, southwest, south and southeast, along 
Federal Interstate Highway 270 to the point where it becomes Federal 
Interstate Highway 255; thence southeast on Federal Interstate Highway 
255 across the Mississippi River; thence north and east to the point 
where Federal Interstate Highway 255 intersects with Federal Interstate 
Highway 270; thence west along Federal Interstate Highway 270 to the 
Mississippi River, the point of beginning.

IV. Authority

    This change is made under the authority of 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 
2, 66, and 1624; and 6 U.S.C. 203.

V. Statutory and Regulatory Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not considered to be an economically significant 
regulatory action under Executive Order 12866, because it will not 
result in the expenditure of over $100 million in any one year. The 
change is intended to expand the geographical boundaries of the Port of 
St. Louis, Missouri, and make it more easily identifiable to the 
public. There are no new costs to the public associated with this rule. 
Accordingly, this rule has not been reviewed by the Office of 
Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive Order 12866.

B. Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires 
Federal agencies to examine the impact a rule would have on small 
entities. A small entity may be a small business (defined as any 
independently owned and operated business not dominant in its field 
that qualifies as a small business per the Small Business Act), a small 
not-for-profit organization, or a small governmental jurisdiction 
(locality with fewer than 50,000 people).
    This rule does not directly regulate small entities. The change is 
part of CBP's continuing program to more efficiently utilize its 
personnel, facilities, and resources, and to provide better service to 
carriers, importers, and the general public. To the extent that all 
entities are able to more efficiently or conveniently access the 
facilities and resources within the expanded geographical area of the 
new port limits, this rule should confer benefits to CBP, carriers, 
importers, and the general public.
    Because this rule does not directly regulate small entities, CBP 
certifies that this rule does not have a significant economic impact on 
a substantial number of small entities.

VI. Signing Authority

    The signing authority for this document falls under 19 CFR 0.2(a), 
because the port extension is not within the bounds of those 
regulations for which the Secretary of the Treasury has retained sole 
authority. Accordingly, this final rule may be signed by the Secretary 
of Homeland Security (or his or her delegate).

List of Subjects in 19 CFR Part 101

    Customs duties and inspection, Customs ports of entry, Exports, 
Imports, Organization and functions (Government agencies).

Amendments to CBP Regulations

0
For the reasons set forth above, part 101, CBP Regulations (19 CFR part 
101) are amended as set forth below.

PART 101--GENERAL PROVISIONS

0
1. The general authority citation for part 101 and the specific 
authority citation for section 101.3 continue to read as follows:

    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 19 U.S.C. 2, 66, 1202 (General Note 
3(i), Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States), 1623, 1624, 
1646a.
    Sections 101.3 and 101.4 also issued under 19 U.S.C. 1 and 58b;
* * * * *

0
2. In the list of ports in section 101.3(b)(1), under the State of 
Missouri, the ``Limits of port'' column adjacent to ``St. Louis'' in 
the ``Ports of entry'' column is amended by removing the language 
``Including territory described in T.D.s 67-57 and 69-224'' and adding 
in its place ``CBP Dec. 09-16.''

    Dated: May 13, 2009.
Janet Napolitano,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E9-11538 Filed 5-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9111-14-P