Airworthiness Directives; Dowty Propellers Models R354/4-123-F/13, R354/4-123-F/20, R375/4-123-F/21, R389/4-123-F/25, R389/4-123-F/26, and R390/4-123-F/27 Propellers, 23129-23131 [E9-11423]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 94 / Monday, May 18, 2009 / Proposed Rules
AMS has reviewed all comments and
we note that improvements in packaging
for table grapes have occurred.
Nonetheless, there were conflicting
comments received that specifically
raised questions regarding: (1)
Marketability and subsequent shrink,
due to changes in packaging; and (2) the
effect this proposed rule would have on
individual businesses. Further, we note
that there is a lack of independent data
available to clarify these issues. In such
circumstances, there continues to be no
clear consensus among industry
segments to support a proposed rule.
Accordingly AMS will not proceed with
this action. However, AMS will
continue to work with the industry to
revise the current U.S. Grade standards
to better reflect the current marketing of
this and other agricultural products.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
Dated: May 12, 2009.
Robert C. Keeney,
Acting Associate Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9–11491 Filed 5–15–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–02–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0545; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NE–16–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dowty
Propellers Models R354/4–123–F/13,
R354/4–123–F/20, R375/4–123–F/21,
R389/4–123–F/25, R389/4–123–F/26,
and R390/4–123–F/27 Propellers
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM);
reopening of the comment period.
13:53 May 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
A number of propeller blade outer sleeves
have been found with cracks since 1996.
Testing has shown that blade retention
integrity is not affected by this cracking.
However, this condition, if not detected and
corrected, can lead to blade counterweight
release, possibly resulting in damage to the
aircraft and injury to occupants or persons on
the ground.
We are proposing this AD to prevent
blade counterweight release, which
could result in injury or damage to the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by June 17, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
Examining the AD Docket
SUMMARY: This supplemental NPRM
revises an earlier proposed
airworthiness directive (AD), applicable
to Dowty Propellers Models R354/4–
123–F/13, R354/4–123–F/20, R375/4–
123–F/21, R389/4–123–F/25, R389/4–
123–F/26, and R390/4–123–F/27
propellers. That proposed AD would
have required initial and repetitive
visual inspections of propeller blade
root outer sleeves for cracks, and
removal before further flight of propeller
blades with cracked blade root outer
sleeves. That proposed AD resulted
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by the European Aviation Safety
VerDate Nov<24>2008
Agency (EASA) to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on certain Dowty
propellers. This supplemental NPRM
revises the proposed AD to correct the
listing of propeller models affected. This
supplemental NPRM results from the
discovery that we need to correct one of
the propeller model numbers affected,
and to remove an erroneous propeller
model number. We are proposing this
AD to prevent blade counterweight
release, which could result in injury or
damage to the airplane. The MCAI
describes the unsafe condition as:
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is the
same as the Mail address provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terry Fahr, Aerospace Engineer, Boston
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
23129
terrance.fahr@faa.gov; telephone (781)
238–7155; fax (781) 238–7170.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–0545; Directorate Identifier
2008–NE–16–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of the Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including, if provided, the name of the
individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review the DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477–78).
Discussion
EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA AD 2008–
0033, dated February 19, 2008, to
correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The EASA AD
states:
A number of propeller blade outer sleeves
have been found with cracks since 1996.
Testing has shown that blade retention
integrity is not affected by this cracking.
However, this condition, if not detected and
corrected, can lead to blade counterweight
release, possibly resulting in damage to the
aircraft and injury to occupants or persons on
the ground.
You may obtain further information
by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Dowty Propellers has issued Alert
Service Bulletin No. SF340–61–A106,
Revision 1, dated March 20, 2008. The
actions described in this service
information are intended to correct the
unsafe condition identified in the
MCAI.
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
23130
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 94 / Monday, May 18, 2009 / Proposed Rules
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of the United
Kingdom, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the United
Kingdom, they have notified us of the
unsafe condition described in the MCAI
and service information referenced
above. We are proposing this AD
because we evaluated all information
provided by EASA and determined the
unsafe condition exists and is likely to
exist or develop on other products of the
same type design. This Supplemental
NPRM requires initial and repetitive
visual inspections of propeller blade
root outer sleeves for cracks, and
removal before further flight of propeller
blades with cracked blade root outer
sleeves.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to
participate in developing this AD. We
considered the comments received on
the original NPRM.
Request to Reference the Latest Service
Bulletin
One commenter, Colgan Air, requests
that we reference the latest service
bulletin, which is Dowty Propellers
Alert Service Bulletin No. SF340–61–
A106, Revision 1, dated March 20, 2008.
We agree and changed that reference
in this Supplemental NPRM.
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Request to Clarify Airplane
Manufacturer
One commenter, SAAB AB, SAAB
Aerosystems, requests that we clarify
that ‘‘340B airplanes’’ should be referred
to as ‘‘SAAB 340B airplanes’’.
We agree and clarified that reference
in this Supplemental NPRM.
Need To Correct the Listing of Propeller
Models Affected
We discovered the need to correct the
listing of the propeller models affected
that was included in the original NPRM
published in the Federal Register on
June 30, 2008 (73 FR 36819). That
listing, which is Dowty Propellers
models R354/4–123–F/13, R354/4–123–
F/20, R354/4–123–F/21, R375/4–123–F/
21, R389/4–123–F/25, R354/4–123–F/
26, and R390/4–123–F/27 propellers, is
changed in this Supplemental NPRM to
Dowty Propellers Models R354/4–123–
F/13, R354/4–123–F/20, R375/4–123–F/
21, R389/4–123–F/25, R389/4–123–F/
26, and R390/4–123–F/27 propellers.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data,
including the comments received, and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:53 May 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
determined that air safety and the
public interest require making the
changes described previously. We
determined that these changes will not
increase the economic burden on any
operator or increase the scope of the
Supplemental NPRM.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we
estimate that this proposed AD would
affect about 292 propellers installed on
airplanes of U.S. registry. We also
estimate that it would take 0.5 workhour per propeller to visually inspect
for cracks. The average labor rate is $80
per work hour. Based on these figures,
we estimate the cost of the proposed AD
on U.S. operators to be $11,680.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code
specifies the FAA’s authority to issue
rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I,
section 106, describes the authority of
the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII:
Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more
detail the scope of the Agency’s
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under
the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII,
Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701:
General requirements.’’ Under that
section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in
air commerce by prescribing regulations
for practices, methods, and procedures
the Administrator finds necessary for
safety in air commerce. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority
because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on
products identified in this rulemaking
action.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation
of the estimated costs to comply with
this proposed AD and placed it in the
AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority
delegated to me by the Administrator,
the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part
39 as follows:
PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS
DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
§ 39.13
[Amended]
2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding
the following new AD:
Dowty Propellers: Docket No. FAA–2008–
0545; Directorate Identifier 2008–NE–
16–AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by June 17,
2009.
Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dowty Propellers
Models R354/4–123–F/13, R354/4–123–F/20,
R375/4–123–F/21, R389/4–123–F/25, R389/
4–123–F/26, and R390/4–123–F/27
propellers. These propellers are installed on,
but not limited to, Saab AB, Saab
Aerosystems SF340A and SAAB SF340B
airplanes.
Regulatory Findings
Reason
We determined that this proposed AD
would not have federalism implications
under Executive Order 13132. This
proposed AD would not have a
substantial direct effect on the States, on
the relationship between the national
Government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I
certify this proposed regulation:
1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ under Executive Order 12866;
2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the
DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures
(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant
economic impact, positive or negative,
on a substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
(d) European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA) AD No. 2008–0033, dated February
19, 2008, states:
A number of propeller blade outer sleeves
have been found with cracks since 1996.
Testing has shown that blade retention
integrity is not affected by this cracking.
However, this condition, if not detected and
corrected, can lead to blade counterweight
release, possibly resulting in damage to the
aircraft and injury to occupants or persons on
the ground.
This AD requires initial and repetitive
visual inspections of propeller blade root
outer sleeves for cracks, and removal before
further flight of propeller blades with cracked
blade root outer sleeves. We are issuing this
AD to prevent blade counterweight release,
which could result in injury or damage to the
airplane.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Actions and Compliance
(e) Unless already done, do the following
actions.
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 94 / Monday, May 18, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Propeller Blade Root Outer Sleeve Visual
Inspections
(1) At the next 1,600 flight hours (FH)
aircraft check after the effective date of this
AD, or, after any blade accumulates 15,000
FH time-in-service, whichever occurs later,
visually inspect all propeller blade root outer
sleeves for cracks.
(2) Thereafter, at intervals not to exceed
1,600 FH, visually inspect all propeller blade
root outer sleeves for cracks.
(3) Before further flight, remove any
propeller blades found with cracked root
outer sleeves during the visual inspections in
paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
(f) None.
Alternative Methods of Compliance
(AMOCs)
(g) The Manager, Boston Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and
Propeller Directorate, has the authority to
approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested
using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19.
Related Information
(h) Refer to European Aviation Safety
Agency AD 2008–0033, dated February 19,
2008, and Dowty Propellers Alert Service
Bulletin No. SF340–61–A106, Revision 1,
dated March 20, 2008, for related
information.
(i) Contact Terry Fahr, Aerospace Engineer,
Boston Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA
01803; e-mail: terry.fahr@faa.gov; telephone
(781) 238–7155; fax (781) 238–7170, for more
information about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
May 8, 2009.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–11423 Filed 5–15–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2008–0545; Directorate
Identifier 2008–NE–16–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
cprice-sewell on PRODPC61 with PROPOSALS
Airworthiness Directives; Dowty
Propellers Models R354/4–123–F/13,
R354/4–123–F/20, R375/4–123–F/21,
R389/4–123–F/25, R389/4–123–F/26,
and R390/4–123–F/27 Propellers
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of
proposed rulemaking (NPRM);
reopening of the comment period.
SUMMARY: This supplemental NPRM
revises an earlier proposed
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:53 May 15, 2009
Jkt 217001
airworthiness directive (AD), applicable
to Dowty Propellers Models R354/4–
123–F/13, R354/4–123–F/20, R375/4–
123–F/21, R389/4–123–F/25, R389/4–
123–F/26, and R390/4–123–F/27
propellers. That proposed AD would
have required initial and repetitive
visual inspections of propeller blade
root outer sleeves for cracks, and
removal before further flight of propeller
blades with cracked blade root outer
sleeves. That proposed AD resulted
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by the European Aviation Safety
Agency (EASA) to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on certain Dowty
propellers. This supplemental NPRM
revises the proposed AD to correct the
listing of propeller models affected. This
supplemental NPRM results from the
discovery that we need to correct one of
the propeller model numbers affected,
and to remove an erroneous propeller
model number. We are proposing this
AD to prevent blade counterweight
release, which could result in injury or
damage to the airplane. The MCAI
describes the unsafe condition as:
A number of propeller blade outer sleeves
have been found with cracks since 1996.
Testing has shown that blade retention
integrity is not affected by this cracking.
However, this condition, if not detected and
corrected, can lead to blade counterweight
release, possibly resulting in damage to the
aircraft and injury to occupants or persons on
the ground.
We are proposing this AD to prevent
blade counterweight release, which
could result in injury or damage to the
airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by June 17, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
• Mail: Docket Management Facility,
U.S. Department of Transportation, 1200
New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building
Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
Washington, DC 20590–0001.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
• Fax: (202) 493–2251.
23131
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is the
same as the Mail address provided in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Terry Fahr, Aerospace Engineer, Boston
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12
New England Executive Park,
Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
terrance.fahr@faa.gov; telephone (781)
238–7155; fax (781) 238–7170.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2008–0545; Directorate Identifier
2008–NE–16–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this proposed AD. We will
consider all comments received by the
closing date and may amend this
proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact with FAA
personnel concerning this proposed AD.
Using the search function of the Web
site, anyone can find and read the
comments in any of our dockets,
including, if provided, the name of the
individual who sent the comment (or
signed the comment on behalf of an
association, business, labor union, etc.).
You may review the DOT’s complete
Privacy Act Statement in the Federal
Register published on April 11, 2000
(65 FR 19477–78).
Discussion
Examining the AD Docket
EASA, which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Community, has issued EASA AD 2008–
0033, dated February 19, 2008, to
correct an unsafe condition for the
specified products. The EASA AD
states:
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov; or in person at the
Docket Operations office between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
A number of propeller blade outer sleeves
have been found with cracks since 1996.
Testing has shown that blade retention
integrity is not affected by this cracking.
However, this condition, if not detected and
corrected, can lead to blade counterweight
release, possibly resulting in damage to the
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\18MYP1.SGM
18MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 94 (Monday, May 18, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 23129-23131]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11423]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA-2008-0545; Directorate Identifier 2008-NE-16-AD]
RIN 2120-AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Dowty Propellers Models R354/4-123-F/
13, R354/4-123-F/20, R375/4-123-F/21, R389/4-123-F/25, R389/4-123-F/26,
and R390/4-123-F/27 Propellers
AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM); reopening of
the comment period.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This supplemental NPRM revises an earlier proposed
airworthiness directive (AD), applicable to Dowty Propellers Models
R354/4-123-F/13, R354/4-123-F/20, R375/4-123-F/21, R389/4-123-F/25,
R389/4-123-F/26, and R390/4-123-F/27 propellers. That proposed AD would
have required initial and repetitive visual inspections of propeller
blade root outer sleeves for cracks, and removal before further flight
of propeller blades with cracked blade root outer sleeves. That
proposed AD resulted from mandatory continuing airworthiness
information (MCAI) issued by the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
to identify and correct an unsafe condition on certain Dowty
propellers. This supplemental NPRM revises the proposed AD to correct
the listing of propeller models affected. This supplemental NPRM
results from the discovery that we need to correct one of the propeller
model numbers affected, and to remove an erroneous propeller model
number. We are proposing this AD to prevent blade counterweight
release, which could result in injury or damage to the airplane. The
MCAI describes the unsafe condition as:
A number of propeller blade outer sleeves have been found with
cracks since 1996. Testing has shown that blade retention integrity
is not affected by this cracking. However, this condition, if not
detected and corrected, can lead to blade counterweight release,
possibly resulting in damage to the aircraft and injury to occupants
or persons on the ground.
We are proposing this AD to prevent blade counterweight release,
which could result in injury or damage to the airplane.
DATES: We must receive comments on this proposed AD by June 17, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the instructions for sending your
comments electronically.
Mail: Docket Management Facility, U.S. Department of
Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12-140, Washington, DC 20590-0001.
Hand Delivery: Deliver to Mail address above between 9
a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
Fax: (202) 493-2251.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on the Internet at https://www.regulations.gov; or in person at the Docket Operations office
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. The AD docket contains this proposed AD, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and other information. The street
address for the Docket Operations office (telephone (800) 647-5527) is
the same as the Mail address provided in the ADDRESSES section.
Comments will be available in the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Terry Fahr, Aerospace Engineer, Boston
Aircraft Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate,
12 New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
terrance.fahr@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238-7155; fax (781) 238-7170.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written relevant data, views, or
arguments about this proposed AD. Send your comments to an address
listed under the ADDRESSES section. Include ``Docket No. FAA-2008-0545;
Directorate Identifier 2008-NE-16-AD'' at the beginning of your
comments. We specifically invite comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy aspects of this proposed AD. We
will consider all comments received by the closing date and may amend
this proposed AD based on those comments.
We will post all comments we receive, without change, to https://www.regulations.gov, including any personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each substantive verbal contact
with FAA personnel concerning this proposed AD. Using the search
function of the Web site, anyone can find and read the comments in any
of our dockets, including, if provided, the name of the individual who
sent the comment (or signed the comment on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the DOT's complete Privacy
Act Statement in the Federal Register published on April 11, 2000 (65
FR 19477-78).
Discussion
EASA, which is the Technical Agent for the Member States of the
European Community, has issued EASA AD 2008-0033, dated February 19,
2008, to correct an unsafe condition for the specified products. The
EASA AD states:
A number of propeller blade outer sleeves have been found with
cracks since 1996. Testing has shown that blade retention integrity
is not affected by this cracking. However, this condition, if not
detected and corrected, can lead to blade counterweight release,
possibly resulting in damage to the aircraft and injury to occupants
or persons on the ground.
You may obtain further information by examining the MCAI in the AD
docket.
Relevant Service Information
Dowty Propellers has issued Alert Service Bulletin No. SF340-61-
A106, Revision 1, dated March 20, 2008. The actions described in this
service information are intended to correct the unsafe condition
identified in the MCAI.
[[Page 23130]]
FAA's Determination and Requirements of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by the aviation authority of the
United Kingdom, and is approved for operation in the United States.
Pursuant to our bilateral agreement with the United Kingdom, they have
notified us of the unsafe condition described in the MCAI and service
information referenced above. We are proposing this AD because we
evaluated all information provided by EASA and determined the unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or develop on other products of
the same type design. This Supplemental NPRM requires initial and
repetitive visual inspections of propeller blade root outer sleeves for
cracks, and removal before further flight of propeller blades with
cracked blade root outer sleeves.
Comments
We gave the public the opportunity to participate in developing
this AD. We considered the comments received on the original NPRM.
Request to Reference the Latest Service Bulletin
One commenter, Colgan Air, requests that we reference the latest
service bulletin, which is Dowty Propellers Alert Service Bulletin No.
SF340-61-A106, Revision 1, dated March 20, 2008.
We agree and changed that reference in this Supplemental NPRM.
Request to Clarify Airplane Manufacturer
One commenter, SAAB AB, SAAB Aerosystems, requests that we clarify
that ``340B airplanes'' should be referred to as ``SAAB 340B
airplanes''.
We agree and clarified that reference in this Supplemental NPRM.
Need To Correct the Listing of Propeller Models Affected
We discovered the need to correct the listing of the propeller
models affected that was included in the original NPRM published in the
Federal Register on June 30, 2008 (73 FR 36819). That listing, which is
Dowty Propellers models R354/4-123-F/13, R354/4-123-F/20, R354/4-123-F/
21, R375/4-123-F/21, R389/4-123-F/25, R354/4-123-F/26, and R390/4-123-
F/27 propellers, is changed in this Supplemental NPRM to Dowty
Propellers Models R354/4-123-F/13, R354/4-123-F/20, R375/4-123-F/21,
R389/4-123-F/25, R389/4-123-F/26, and R390/4-123-F/27 propellers.
Conclusion
We reviewed the available data, including the comments received,
and determined that air safety and the public interest require making
the changes described previously. We determined that these changes will
not increase the economic burden on any operator or increase the scope
of the Supplemental NPRM.
Costs of Compliance
Based on the service information, we estimate that this proposed AD
would affect about 292 propellers installed on airplanes of U.S.
registry. We also estimate that it would take 0.5 work-hour per
propeller to visually inspect for cracks. The average labor rate is $80
per work hour. Based on these figures, we estimate the cost of the
proposed AD on U.S. operators to be $11,680.
Authority for This Rulemaking
Title 49 of the United States Code specifies the FAA's authority to
issue rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, section 106, describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator. ``Subtitle VII: Aviation
Programs,'' describes in more detail the scope of the Agency's
authority.
We are issuing this rulemaking under the authority described in
``Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: General
requirements.'' Under that section, Congress charges the FAA with
promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in air commerce by prescribing
regulations for practices, methods, and procedures the Administrator
finds necessary for safety in air commerce. This regulation is within
the scope of that authority because it addresses an unsafe condition
that is likely to exist or develop on products identified in this
rulemaking action.
Regulatory Findings
We determined that this proposed AD would not have federalism
implications under Executive Order 13132. This proposed AD would not
have a substantial direct effect on the States, on the relationship
between the national Government and the States, or on the distribution
of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.
For the reasons discussed above, I certify this proposed
regulation:
1. Is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under Executive Order
12866;
2. Is not a ``significant rule'' under the DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); and
3. Will not have a significant economic impact, positive or
negative, on a substantial number of small entities under the criteria
of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
We prepared a regulatory evaluation of the estimated costs to
comply with this proposed AD and placed it in the AD docket.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation safety, Safety.
The Proposed Amendment
Accordingly, under the authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 39 as follows:
PART 39--AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVES
1. The authority citation for part 39 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701.
Sec. 39.13 [Amended]
2. The FAA amends Sec. 39.13 by adding the following new AD:
Dowty Propellers: Docket No. FAA-2008-0545; Directorate Identifier
2008-NE-16-AD.
Comments Due Date
(a) We must receive comments by June 17, 2009.
Affected Airworthiness Directives (ADs)
(b) None.
Applicability
(c) This AD applies to Dowty Propellers Models R354/4-123-F/13,
R354/4-123-F/20, R375/4-123-F/21, R389/4-123-F/25, R389/4-123-F/26,
and R390/4-123-F/27 propellers. These propellers are installed on,
but not limited to, Saab AB, Saab Aerosystems SF340A and SAAB SF340B
airplanes.
Reason
(d) European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) AD No. 2008-0033,
dated February 19, 2008, states:
A number of propeller blade outer sleeves have been found with
cracks since 1996. Testing has shown that blade retention integrity
is not affected by this cracking. However, this condition, if not
detected and corrected, can lead to blade counterweight release,
possibly resulting in damage to the aircraft and injury to occupants
or persons on the ground.
This AD requires initial and repetitive visual inspections of
propeller blade root outer sleeves for cracks, and removal before
further flight of propeller blades with cracked blade root outer
sleeves. We are issuing this AD to prevent blade counterweight
release, which could result in injury or damage to the airplane.
Actions and Compliance
(e) Unless already done, do the following actions.
[[Page 23131]]
Propeller Blade Root Outer Sleeve Visual Inspections
(1) At the next 1,600 flight hours (FH) aircraft check after the
effective date of this AD, or, after any blade accumulates 15,000 FH
time-in-service, whichever occurs later, visually inspect all
propeller blade root outer sleeves for cracks.
(2) Thereafter, at intervals not to exceed 1,600 FH, visually
inspect all propeller blade root outer sleeves for cracks.
(3) Before further flight, remove any propeller blades found
with cracked root outer sleeves during the visual inspections in
paragraphs (e)(1) and (e)(2) of this AD.
FAA AD Differences
(f) None.
Alternative Methods of Compliance (AMOCs)
(g) The Manager, Boston Aircraft Certification Office, FAA,
Engine and Propeller Directorate, has the authority to approve AMOCs
for this AD, if requested using the procedures found in 14 CFR
39.19.
Related Information
(h) Refer to European Aviation Safety Agency AD 2008-0033, dated
February 19, 2008, and Dowty Propellers Alert Service Bulletin No.
SF340-61-A106, Revision 1, dated March 20, 2008, for related
information.
(i) Contact Terry Fahr, Aerospace Engineer, Boston Aircraft
Certification Office, FAA, Engine and Propeller Directorate, 12 New
England Executive Park, Burlington, MA 01803; e-mail:
terry.fahr@faa.gov; telephone (781) 238-7155; fax (781) 238-7170,
for more information about this AD.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on May 8, 2009.
Peter A. White,
Assistant Manager, Engine and Propeller Directorate, Aircraft
Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9-11423 Filed 5-15-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P