Expansion of Enrollment in the VA Health Care System, 22832-22835 [E9-11400]
Download as PDF
22832
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 93 / Friday, May 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
13175, Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,
because it does not have a substantial
direct effect on one or more Indian
tribes, on the relationship between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this rule under
Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This rule does not use technical
standards. Therefore, we did not
consider the use of voluntary consensus
standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this rule under
Department of Homeland Security
Management Directive 023–01 and
Commandant Instruction M16475.lD,
which guide the Coast Guard in
complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have concluded this action is one of a
category of actions which do not
individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human
environment. This rule is categorically
excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph
(34)(d) of the Instruction and neither an
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:00 May 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
environmental assessment nor an
environmental impact statement is
required. This rule involves a temporary
safety zone that will be in effect for less
than one week. An ‘‘Environmental
Analysis Check List’’ supporting this
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ section of this preamble.
List of Subjects 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
■ For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33
CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6 and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
Duty Officer at Sector Hampton Roads
in Portsmouth, Virginia at telephone
number (757) 668–5555.
(4) The Coast Guard Representatives
enforcing the safety zone can be
contacted on VHF–FM marine band
radio channel 13 (165.65Mhz) and
channel 16 (156.8 Mhz).
(d) Enforcement Period: This
regulation will be in enforced from 10
a.m. to 4 p.m. daily from June 12, 2009
to June 14, 2009.
Dated: May 1, 2009.
M.S. Ogle,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port Hampton Roads.
[FR Doc. E9–11326 Filed 5–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900–AN23
Expansion of Enrollment in the VA
Health Care System
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
■
2. Add § 165.T05–0064 to read as
follows:
AGENCY:
§ 165.T05–0064 Safety Zone: Ocean City
Air Show, Atlantic Ocean, Ocean City, MD.
SUMMARY: This document amends the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
medical regulations regarding
enrollment in the VA health care
system. In particular, it establishes
additional sub-priorities within
enrollment priority category 8 and
provides that beginning on the effective
date of the rule, VA will begin enrolling
priority category 8 veterans whose
income exceeds the current means test
and geographic means test income
thresholds by 10 percent or less.
DATES: Effective date: This final rule is
effective June 15, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Tony Guagliardo, Director, Business
Policy, Chief Business Office (163),
Veterans Health Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810
Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20420, (202) 461–1591. (This is not a
toll free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a
document published in the Federal
Register (74 FR 3535) on January 21,
2009, we proposed amendments to 38
CFR 17.36 regarding enrollment of
veterans for purposes of VA hospital
and outpatient care. This document
adopts as a final rule, without change,
those proposed amendments.
This final rule amends regulations
implementing Public Law 104–262, the
Veterans’ Health Care Eligibility Reform
Act of 1996, which required VA to
(a) Regulated Area. The following area
is a safety zone: specified waters of the
Atlantic Ocean bound by the following
coordinates: 38°21′30″ N/075°03′32″ W,
38°21′39″ N/075°04′08″ W, 38°29′47″ N/
075°04′58″ W, 38°19′37″ N/075°04′20″
W (NAD 1983), in the vicinity of Ocean
City, Maryland.
(b) Definition: For the purposes of this
part, Captain of the Port Representative:
means any U.S. Coast Guard
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
who has been authorized by the Captain
of the Port, Hampton Roads, Virginia to
act on his behalf.
(c) Regulations: (1) In accordance with
the general regulations in § 165.23 of
this part, entry into this zone is
prohibited unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, Hampton Roads or
his designated representatives.
(2) The operator of any vessel in the
immediate vicinity of this safety zone
shall:
(i) Stop the vessel immediately upon
being directed to do so by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(ii) Proceed as directed by any
commissioned, warrant or petty officer
on shore or on board a vessel that is
displaying a U.S. Coast Guard Ensign.
(3) The Captain of the Port, Hampton
Roads can be reached through the Sector
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ACTION:
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 93 / Friday, May 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
establish a national enrollment system
to manage the delivery of inpatient
hospital care and outpatient medical
care, within available appropriated
resources. It directed that the
enrollment system be managed in such
a way as ‘‘to ensure that the provision
of care to enrollees is timely and
acceptable in quality,’’ and authorized
such sub-prioritization of the statutory
enrollment categories ‘‘as the Secretary
determines necessary.’’ The law also
provided that starting on October 1,
1998, most veterans had to enroll in the
VA health care system as a condition for
receiving VA hospital and outpatient
care.
We provided a 60-day comment
period, which ended on February 20,
2009. We received comments from one
individual who essentially expressed
concern about VA’s evaluation of his
service-connected disability and
recommended that VA amend the
current means test for VA medical care
to provide certain unspecified
exceptions. However, we did not
propose to amend any of the disability
evaluation regulations in 38 CFR part 3
or how VA administers the current
means test for VA medical care in 38
CFR 17.47(d) through (f). Accordingly,
the comments are not within the scope
of this rulemaking and we will not make
any changes based upon the comments.
Previous Interim Final Rule and
Responses to Comments
The proposed rule also noted that the
amendments would modify provisions
adopted in the interim final rule
published in the Federal Register on
January 17, 2003 (68 FR 2669), which
limited enrollment of veterans for VA
medical care under priority category 8.
We received five comments concerning
that interim final rule. All of the
commenters expressed disagreement
with VA’s decision to suspend
enrollment of additional veterans in
priority category 8. In that regard, each
of the commenters would support the
extension of priority 8 coverage in this
final rule.
Each of the commenters also generally
expressed the view that VA should
provide care to all veterans because they
served their country. However, as
discussed in the preambles to the 2003
interim final rule and 2009 proposed
rule, VA is required to assess available
resources and determine the number of
veterans it is able to enroll to ensure
that medical services provided are both
timely and acceptable in quality. An
enrollment system is necessary because
the provision of VA health care is
discretionary and can be provided only
to the extent that appropriated resources
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:00 May 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
are available for that purpose. The
enrollment decisions made in the
interim final rule and this final rule
were based on an assessment
concerning available resources, and we
did not receive any comments regarding
either rule suggesting that VA’s
assessment was incorrect.
Based on the rationale in the
proposed rule, we are adopting the
provisions of the proposed rule as a
final rule without change.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that agencies
prepare an assessment of anticipated
costs and benefits before issuing any
rule that may result in the expenditure
by State, local, and tribal governments,
in the aggregate, or by the private sector
of $100 million or more in any given
year. This rule would have no such
effect on State, local, or tribal
governments.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no provisions
constituting a new collection of
information, but would change, merely
by adding an option of a new method
of submission, a collection of
information that has been approved by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) in accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3521). OMB assigns a
control number for each collection of
information it approves. VA may not
conduct or sponsor, and a person is not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number.
The information collection provisions
affected by this rule have been approved
under control number 2900–0091.
Executive Order 12866 and
Congressional Review Act
This is an economically significant
regulatory action under Executive Order
12866 and constitutes a major rule
under the Congressional Review Act.
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity).
Executive Order 12866 classifies a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ requiring
review by OMB as any regulatory action
that is likely to result in a rule that may:
(1) Have an annual effect on the
economy of $100 million or more, or
adversely affect in a material way the
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22833
economy, a sector of the economy,
productivity, competition, jobs, the
environment, public health or safety, or
State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) create a serious
inconsistency or interfere with an action
taken or planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
entitlement recipients; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
VA has examined the economic,
interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this rule and has
concluded that it is an economically
significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866 because it may
have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more and may raise
novel legal or policy issues arising out
of legal mandates, the President’s
priorities, or the principles set forth in
the Executive Order. This rule is also a
major rule under the Congressional
Review Act because it is likely to result
in an annual effect on the economy of
$100 million or more.
VA has attempted to follow OMB
circular A–4 to the extent feasible in
this analysis. The circular first calls for
a discussion of the need for the
regulation. The Consolidated Security,
Disaster Assistance, and Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub. L. 110–
329) was enacted on September 30,
2008. The accompanying report
language stated that funding was
included to reopen priority category 8
enrollment. The preamble above
discusses the need for the regulation in
more detail. There are not any
alternatives to publishing this rule that
will accomplish the stated provisions in
the report language of the Consolidated
Security, Disaster Assistance, and
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009
(Pub. L. 110–329).
VA uses the Enrollee Health Care
Projection Model (Model), a health care
actuarial model, to project veteran
demand for VA health care. To project
enrollment and expenditures under this
proposed regulatory change, VA first
identified the number of non-enrolled
veterans whose income exceeds the
current VA means test and geographic
means test income thresholds by 10
percent or less. VA then projected the
number of those veterans who would
enroll based on historical priority
category 8 enrollment rates. The
projected health care service utilization
for these new enrollees was based on
the historical morbidity and reliance
rates of the current priority category 8
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
22834
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 93 / Friday, May 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
enrollee population. The projected
expenditures represent the cost to
provide the projected health care
services to these new enrollees.
Using the 2008 Model, VA projects
that this regulatory change would result
in an additional 258,705 priority
category 8 enrollees in FY 2009. The
projected increase in total health care
service expenditures associated with
this new enrollment is $485 million in
FY 2009. The revenues generated by the
first- and third-party collections are
projected to be $121 million,1 resulting
in a $364 million growth in net health
service expenditures for FY 2009, and
$375 million was provided in the
Consolidated Security, Disaster
Assistance, and Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub. L. 110–
329). VA’s expenditures related to this
proposed regulatory change are
projected to be approximately $2.931
billion for five years.2 These
expenditures exclude services such as
Long Term Care, Readjustment
Counseling, Spina Bifida, Foreign
Medical Programs, Non-Veteran Medical
Care and CHAMPVA.
1 The first party collections are based on
the projected health care service utilization
of the new Priority 8 enrollees. In the base
year (2007), we applied the appropriate copayment to the projected services. We then
balanced the resulting co-payment revenue
projections to the actual collections for 2007
for four categories (inpatient, outpatient,
residential rehabilitation, and pharmacy) and
by Veterans Integrated Service Network
(VISN) to account for the amount actually
collected. The resulting first-party revenue
per service developed for 2007 is applied to
the projected services in future years to
project the first-party revenue associated
with health care utilization of the new
Priority 8 enrollees. Further, the pharmacy
co-payment is increased over time based on
the legislated Consumer Price Index (CPI)
schedule.
To develop the third-party collections, we
calculated the percentage of third-party
revenue collected in 2007 as a percent of
2007 expenditures by VISN, priority level,
and two age bands (under and over age 65).
We then applied these percentages to the
projected expenditures for the new Priority 8
enrollees in future years. For 2010, the
percentages were increased to reflect VHA’s
initiatives to increase third-party revenue
collections.
2 Five Year Projection Table
($ in billions):
Present Value: (Future Value)/((1+i)∧n):
($ in billions) .....................................................................
Future Value (FV) ............................................................
3% discount rate (i) ..........................................................
7% discount rate (i) ..........................................................
Number of Years (n) ........................................................
Present Value (PV) at 3% ...............................................
Present Value (PV) at 7% ...............................................
FY 2009
$0.485
3.00%
7.00%
0
$0.485
$0.485
FY 2010
$0.533
3.00%
7.00%
1
$0.517
$0.498
FY 2011
$0.580
3.00%
7.00%
2
$0.546
$0.506
FY 2012
$0.631
3.00%
7.00%
3
$0.578
$0.515
FY 2013
$0.702
3.00%
7.00%
4
$0.624
$0.536
5 year
$2.931
....................
....................
....................
$2.751
$2.540
Regulatory Flexibility Act
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
The Secretary hereby certifies that the
adoption of this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities as
they are defined in the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. This
rule will not directly affect any small
entities. Only individuals will be
directly affected. Therefore, pursuant to
5 U.S.C. 605(b), this rule is exempt from
the final regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of section 604.
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug
abuse, Foreign relations, Government
contracts, Grant programs—health,
Grant programs—veterans, Health care,
Health facilities, Health professions,
Health records, Homeless, Medical and
dental schools, Medical devices,
Medical research, Mental health
programs, Nursing homes, Philippines,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Scholarships and
fellowships, Travel and transportation
expenses, Veterans.
§ 17.36 Enrollment—provision of hospital
and outpatient care to veterans.
*
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance numbers and titles for the
programs affected by this document are
64.005, Grants to States for the
Construction of State Homes; 64.007,
Blind Rehabilitation Centers; 64.008,
Veterans Domiciliary Care; 64.009,
Veterans Medical Care Benefits; 64.010,
Veterans Nursing Home Care; 64.011,
Veterans Dental Care; 64.012, Veterans
Prescription Service; 64.013, Veterans
Prosthetic Appliances; 64.014, Veterans
State Domiciliary Care; 64.015, Veterans
State Nursing Home Care; 64.016,
Veterans State Hospital Care; 64.018,
Sharing Specialized Medical Resources;
64.019, Veterans Rehabilitation Alcohol
and Drug Dependence; and 64.022,
Veterans Home Based Primary Care.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:00 May 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
Approved: April 15, 2009.
John R. Gingrich,
Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs amends 38 CFR part 17 as
follows:
■
PART 17—MEDICAL
1. The authority citation for part 17
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1721, and as
stated in specific sections.
2. Amend § 17.36 by revising
paragraphs (b)(8), (c)(1), (c)(2), and
(d)(1) and the authority citation to read
as follows:
■
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(8) Veterans not included in priority
category 4 or 7, who are eligible for care
only if they agree to pay to the United
States the applicable copayment
determined under 38 U.S.C. 1710(f) and
1710(g). This category is further
prioritized into the following
subcategories:
(i) Noncompensable zero percent
service-connected veterans who were in
an enrolled status on January 17, 2003,
or who are moved from a higher priority
category or subcategory due to no longer
being eligible for inclusion in such
priority category or subcategory and
who subsequently do not request
disenrollment;
(ii) Noncompensable zero percent
service-connected veterans not included
in paragraph (b)(8)(i) of this section and
whose income is not greater than ten
percent more than the income that
would permit their enrollment in
priority category 5 or priority category 7,
whichever is higher;
(iii) Nonservice-connected veterans
who were in an enrolled status on
January 17, 2003, or who are moved
from a higher priority category or
subcategory due to no longer being
eligible for inclusion in such priority
category or subcategory and who
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 93 / Friday, May 15, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
subsequently do not request
disenrollment;
(iv) Nonservice-connected veterans
not included in paragraph (b)(8)(iii) of
this section and whose income is not
greater than ten percent more than the
income that would permit their
enrollment in priority category 5 or
priority category 7, whichever is higher;
(v) Noncompensable zero percent
service-connected veterans not included
in paragraph (b)(8)(i) or paragraph
(b)(8)(ii) of this section; and
(vi) Nonservice-connected veterans
not included in paragraph (b)(8)(iii) or
paragraph (b)(8)(iv) of this section.
(c) * * *
(1) It is anticipated that each year the
Secretary will consider whether to
change the categories and subcategories
of veterans eligible to be enrolled. The
Secretary at any time may revise the
categories or subcategories of veterans
eligible to be enrolled by amending
paragraph (c)(2) of this section. The
preamble to a Federal Register
document announcing which priority
categories and subcategories are eligible
to be enrolled must specify the
projected number of fiscal year
applicants for enrollment in each
priority category, projected healthcare
utilization and expenditures for
veterans in each priority category,
appropriated funds and other revenue
projected to be available for fiscal year
enrollees, and projected total
expenditures for enrollees by priority
category. The determination should
include consideration of relevant
internal and external factors, e.g.,
economic changes, changes in medical
practices, and waiting times to obtain an
appointment for care. Consistent with
these criteria, the Secretary will
determine which categories of veterans
are eligible to be enrolled based on the
order of priority specified in paragraph
(b) of this section.
(2) Unless changed by a rulemaking
document in accordance with paragraph
(c)(1) of this section, VA will enroll the
priority categories of veterans set forth
in § 17.36(b) beginning [effective date of
regulation], except that those veterans in
subcategories (v) and (vi) of priority
category 8 are not eligible to be enrolled.
(d) * * *
(1) Application for enrollment. A
veteran may apply to be enrolled in the
VA healthcare system at any time. A
veteran who wishes to be enrolled must
apply by submitting a VA Form 10–
10EZ to a VA medical facility or via an
Online submission at https://
www.1010ez.med.va.gov/sec/vha/
1010ez/.
*
*
*
*
*
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:00 May 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1521, 1701,
1705, 1710, 1722)
[FR Doc. E9–11400 Filed 5–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320–01–P
POSTAL SERVICE
39 CFR Part 111
Standard Mail Volume Incentive
Program (aka Summer Sale)
Postal ServiceTM.
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Postal Service is revising
Mailing Standards of the United States
Postal Service, Domestic Mail Manual
(DMM®), to add section 709.2 which
introduces new standards for a special
volume incentive program for mailers of
Standard Mail® letters and flats with
mail volume exceeding their individual
USPSTM-determined threshold levels.
The program period will be from July 1,
2009 through September 30, 2009.
DATES: Effective Date: July 1, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kevin Gunther at 202–268–7208.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Postal
Service is implementing a volume
incentive program for qualified highvolume mailers of commercial or
Nonprofit Standard Mail letters and
flats, for volume mailed between July 1,
2009 and September 30, 2009, above
their USPS-determined threshold level.
This program encourages mailers to
provide new volume and to take
advantage of our current excess capacity
to process and deliver additional
volume.
To participate, mailers must be the
permit holder (i.e., owner) of a permit
imprint advance deposit account(s) or
the owner of qualifying mail volume
entered through the permit imprint
advance deposit account of a mail
service provider. Qualifying mailers
must be able to demonstrate volume of
at least one million pieces, within the
program qualification period of October
1, 2007 to March 31, 2008, for a permit
imprint advance deposit account(s),
precanceled stamp permit(s), postage
meter permit(s), or by a combination of
these methods. Applicants may also
qualify for the program with volume
mailed through an account(s) owned by
a mail service provider, when adequate
documentation is provided that
specifies the applicant is the owner of
the mail. Those mailers eligible to
participate in the program will be
notified in writing before June 1, 2009.
Mailers wishing to participate in the
program, who believe they meet the
PO 00000
Frm 00017
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22835
eligibility standards under DMM 709.2.2
and were not notified by letter, may
request a review of their eligibility by
contacting the USPS at
summersale@usps.gov.
The Postal Service has a process,
through its Business Service Network
(BSN), to review questions from
qualifying mailers regarding
calculations of their respective
threshold levels or their recorded
volume within the program period.
Qualifying mailers will be provided
with program details and the procedure
for questioning threshold calculations
by letter before June 1, 2009.
A Federal Register final rule,
published April 6, 2009 (74 FR 8009–
8033) implemented a saturation mail
volume incentive program encouraging
mailers to increase their saturation
Standard Mail letters or flats volume
within the period beginning on May 11,
2009 and ending May 10, 2010. This
program initially excluded mailers,
entering into the saturation mail volume
incentive program, from participating in
other Postal Service-sponsored
incentive programs. However, standards
have been revised to allow mailers to be
eligible for the Standard Mail volume
incentive program independently of
their status within the saturation mail
volume incentive program.
Participating mailers demonstrating
Standard Mail letter or flat volume
above their established threshold level
will receive a credit following the close
of the program period. Thresholds will
be calculated independently for each
applicant, by comparing the volume of
Standard Mail letters and flats mailed
within the period from October 1, 2007
to March 31, 2008 to the volume of
Standard Mail letters and flats mailed
within the period of October 1, 2008 to
March 31, 2009. The change in recorded
volume between these two periods will
represent the applicant’s volume trend.
Trends that show growth for the period
of October 1, 2008 to March 31, 2009,
versus that shown in the same period of
the prior year, will appear as a ratio
above 1.0 (expressed here in a decimal
format). A volume decline from October
1, 2008 to March 31, 2009 will appear
as a ratio below 1.0. The applicable ratio
will then be applied to the volume of
Standard Mail letters and flats, for all of
the applicant’s permit volume or other
qualifying volume recorded through the
permit(s) of a mail service provider,
demonstrated during the period from
July 1, 2008 through September 30,
2008. This result represents the USPSdetermined threshold level for an
individual applicant.
Mailers (applicants) are eligible to
participate in the program with
E:\FR\FM\15MYR1.SGM
15MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 93 (Friday, May 15, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22832-22835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11400]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 17
RIN 2900-AN23
Expansion of Enrollment in the VA Health Care System
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document amends the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
medical regulations regarding enrollment in the VA health care system.
In particular, it establishes additional sub-priorities within
enrollment priority category 8 and provides that beginning on the
effective date of the rule, VA will begin enrolling priority category 8
veterans whose income exceeds the current means test and geographic
means test income thresholds by 10 percent or less.
DATES: Effective date: This final rule is effective June 15, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tony Guagliardo, Director, Business
Policy, Chief Business Office (163), Veterans Health Administration,
Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC
20420, (202) 461-1591. (This is not a toll free number).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In a document published in the Federal
Register (74 FR 3535) on January 21, 2009, we proposed amendments to 38
CFR 17.36 regarding enrollment of veterans for purposes of VA hospital
and outpatient care. This document adopts as a final rule, without
change, those proposed amendments.
This final rule amends regulations implementing Public Law 104-262,
the Veterans' Health Care Eligibility Reform Act of 1996, which
required VA to
[[Page 22833]]
establish a national enrollment system to manage the delivery of
inpatient hospital care and outpatient medical care, within available
appropriated resources. It directed that the enrollment system be
managed in such a way as ``to ensure that the provision of care to
enrollees is timely and acceptable in quality,'' and authorized such
sub-prioritization of the statutory enrollment categories ``as the
Secretary determines necessary.'' The law also provided that starting
on October 1, 1998, most veterans had to enroll in the VA health care
system as a condition for receiving VA hospital and outpatient care.
We provided a 60-day comment period, which ended on February 20,
2009. We received comments from one individual who essentially
expressed concern about VA's evaluation of his service-connected
disability and recommended that VA amend the current means test for VA
medical care to provide certain unspecified exceptions. However, we did
not propose to amend any of the disability evaluation regulations in 38
CFR part 3 or how VA administers the current means test for VA medical
care in 38 CFR 17.47(d) through (f). Accordingly, the comments are not
within the scope of this rulemaking and we will not make any changes
based upon the comments.
Previous Interim Final Rule and Responses to Comments
The proposed rule also noted that the amendments would modify
provisions adopted in the interim final rule published in the Federal
Register on January 17, 2003 (68 FR 2669), which limited enrollment of
veterans for VA medical care under priority category 8. We received
five comments concerning that interim final rule. All of the commenters
expressed disagreement with VA's decision to suspend enrollment of
additional veterans in priority category 8. In that regard, each of the
commenters would support the extension of priority 8 coverage in this
final rule.
Each of the commenters also generally expressed the view that VA
should provide care to all veterans because they served their country.
However, as discussed in the preambles to the 2003 interim final rule
and 2009 proposed rule, VA is required to assess available resources
and determine the number of veterans it is able to enroll to ensure
that medical services provided are both timely and acceptable in
quality. An enrollment system is necessary because the provision of VA
health care is discretionary and can be provided only to the extent
that appropriated resources are available for that purpose. The
enrollment decisions made in the interim final rule and this final rule
were based on an assessment concerning available resources, and we did
not receive any comments regarding either rule suggesting that VA's
assessment was incorrect.
Based on the rationale in the proposed rule, we are adopting the
provisions of the proposed rule as a final rule without change.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the expenditure by State, local,
and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100 million or more in any given year. This rule would have no such
effect on State, local, or tribal governments.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This rule contains no provisions constituting a new collection of
information, but would change, merely by adding an option of a new
method of submission, a collection of information that has been
approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in accordance
with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521). OMB
assigns a control number for each collection of information it
approves. VA may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required
to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a
currently valid OMB control number. The information collection
provisions affected by this rule have been approved under control
number 2900-0091.
Executive Order 12866 and Congressional Review Act
This is an economically significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 12866 and constitutes a major rule under the
Congressional Review Act.
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). Executive
Order 12866 classifies a ``significant regulatory action'' requiring
review by OMB as any regulatory action that is likely to result in a
rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million
or more, or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of
the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public
health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or
communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or interfere with an
action taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially alter the
budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs
or the rights and obligations of entitlement recipients; or (4) raise
novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the
President's priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
VA has examined the economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and
policy implications of this rule and has concluded that it is an
economically significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866
because it may have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or
more and may raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President's priorities, or the principles set forth in
the Executive Order. This rule is also a major rule under the
Congressional Review Act because it is likely to result in an annual
effect on the economy of $100 million or more.
VA has attempted to follow OMB circular A-4 to the extent feasible
in this analysis. The circular first calls for a discussion of the need
for the regulation. The Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub. L. 110-329) was enacted on
September 30, 2008. The accompanying report language stated that
funding was included to reopen priority category 8 enrollment. The
preamble above discusses the need for the regulation in more detail.
There are not any alternatives to publishing this rule that will
accomplish the stated provisions in the report language of the
Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and Continuing
Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub. L. 110-329).
VA uses the Enrollee Health Care Projection Model (Model), a health
care actuarial model, to project veteran demand for VA health care. To
project enrollment and expenditures under this proposed regulatory
change, VA first identified the number of non-enrolled veterans whose
income exceeds the current VA means test and geographic means test
income thresholds by 10 percent or less. VA then projected the number
of those veterans who would enroll based on historical priority
category 8 enrollment rates. The projected health care service
utilization for these new enrollees was based on the historical
morbidity and reliance rates of the current priority category 8
[[Page 22834]]
enrollee population. The projected expenditures represent the cost to
provide the projected health care services to these new enrollees.
Using the 2008 Model, VA projects that this regulatory change would
result in an additional 258,705 priority category 8 enrollees in FY
2009. The projected increase in total health care service expenditures
associated with this new enrollment is $485 million in FY 2009. The
revenues generated by the first- and third-party collections are
projected to be $121 million,\1\ resulting in a $364 million growth in
net health service expenditures for FY 2009, and $375 million was
provided in the Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and
Continuing Appropriations Act, 2009 (Pub. L. 110-329). VA's
expenditures related to this proposed regulatory change are projected
to be approximately $2.931 billion for five years.\2\ These
expenditures exclude services such as Long Term Care, Readjustment
Counseling, Spina Bifida, Foreign Medical Programs, Non-Veteran Medical
Care and CHAMPVA.
\1\ The first party collections are based on the projected
health care service utilization of the new Priority 8 enrollees. In
the base year (2007), we applied the appropriate co-payment to the
projected services. We then balanced the resulting co-payment
revenue projections to the actual collections for 2007 for four
categories (inpatient, outpatient, residential rehabilitation, and
pharmacy) and by Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) to
account for the amount actually collected. The resulting first-party
revenue per service developed for 2007 is applied to the projected
services in future years to project the first-party revenue
associated with health care utilization of the new Priority 8
enrollees. Further, the pharmacy co-payment is increased over time
based on the legislated Consumer Price Index (CPI) schedule.
To develop the third-party collections, we calculated the
percentage of third-party revenue collected in 2007 as a percent of
2007 expenditures by VISN, priority level, and two age bands (under
and over age 65). We then applied these percentages to the projected
expenditures for the new Priority 8 enrollees in future years. For
2010, the percentages were increased to reflect VHA's initiatives to
increase third-party revenue collections.
\2\ Five Year Projection Table
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
($ in billions):
Present Value: (Future Value)/
((1+i)[supcaret]n):
($ in billions)................... FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 5 year
Future Value (FV)................. $0.485 $0.533 $0.580 $0.631 $0.702 $2.931
3% discount rate (i).............. 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% 3.00% ...........
7% discount rate (i).............. 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 7.00% ...........
Number of Years (n)............... 0 1 2 3 4 ...........
Present Value (PV) at 3%.......... $0.485 $0.517 $0.546 $0.578 $0.624 $2.751
Present Value (PV) at 7%.......... $0.485 $0.498 $0.506 $0.515 $0.536 $2.540
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that the adoption of this rule will
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5
U.S.C. 601-612. This rule will not directly affect any small entities.
Only individuals will be directly affected. Therefore, pursuant to 5
U.S.C. 605(b), this rule is exempt from the final regulatory
flexibility analysis requirements of section 604.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance numbers and titles for
the programs affected by this document are 64.005, Grants to States for
the Construction of State Homes; 64.007, Blind Rehabilitation Centers;
64.008, Veterans Domiciliary Care; 64.009, Veterans Medical Care
Benefits; 64.010, Veterans Nursing Home Care; 64.011, Veterans Dental
Care; 64.012, Veterans Prescription Service; 64.013, Veterans
Prosthetic Appliances; 64.014, Veterans State Domiciliary Care; 64.015,
Veterans State Nursing Home Care; 64.016, Veterans State Hospital Care;
64.018, Sharing Specialized Medical Resources; 64.019, Veterans
Rehabilitation Alcohol and Drug Dependence; and 64.022, Veterans Home
Based Primary Care.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 17
Administrative practice and procedure, Alcohol abuse, Alcoholism,
Claims, Day care, Dental health, Drug abuse, Foreign relations,
Government contracts, Grant programs--health, Grant programs--veterans,
Health care, Health facilities, Health professions, Health records,
Homeless, Medical and dental schools, Medical devices, Medical
research, Mental health programs, Nursing homes, Philippines, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements, Scholarships and fellowships, Travel
and transportation expenses, Veterans.
Approved: April 15, 2009.
John R. Gingrich,
Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs.
0
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Department of Veterans
Affairs amends 38 CFR part 17 as follows:
PART 17--MEDICAL
0
1. The authority citation for part 17 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 38 U.S.C. 501, 1721, and as stated in specific
sections.
0
2. Amend Sec. 17.36 by revising paragraphs (b)(8), (c)(1), (c)(2), and
(d)(1) and the authority citation to read as follows:
Sec. 17.36 Enrollment--provision of hospital and outpatient care to
veterans.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(8) Veterans not included in priority category 4 or 7, who are
eligible for care only if they agree to pay to the United States the
applicable copayment determined under 38 U.S.C. 1710(f) and 1710(g).
This category is further prioritized into the following subcategories:
(i) Noncompensable zero percent service-connected veterans who were
in an enrolled status on January 17, 2003, or who are moved from a
higher priority category or subcategory due to no longer being eligible
for inclusion in such priority category or subcategory and who
subsequently do not request disenrollment;
(ii) Noncompensable zero percent service-connected veterans not
included in paragraph (b)(8)(i) of this section and whose income is not
greater than ten percent more than the income that would permit their
enrollment in priority category 5 or priority category 7, whichever is
higher;
(iii) Nonservice-connected veterans who were in an enrolled status
on January 17, 2003, or who are moved from a higher priority category
or subcategory due to no longer being eligible for inclusion in such
priority category or subcategory and who
[[Page 22835]]
subsequently do not request disenrollment;
(iv) Nonservice-connected veterans not included in paragraph
(b)(8)(iii) of this section and whose income is not greater than ten
percent more than the income that would permit their enrollment in
priority category 5 or priority category 7, whichever is higher;
(v) Noncompensable zero percent service-connected veterans not
included in paragraph (b)(8)(i) or paragraph (b)(8)(ii) of this
section; and
(vi) Nonservice-connected veterans not included in paragraph
(b)(8)(iii) or paragraph (b)(8)(iv) of this section.
(c) * * *
(1) It is anticipated that each year the Secretary will consider
whether to change the categories and subcategories of veterans eligible
to be enrolled. The Secretary at any time may revise the categories or
subcategories of veterans eligible to be enrolled by amending paragraph
(c)(2) of this section. The preamble to a Federal Register document
announcing which priority categories and subcategories are eligible to
be enrolled must specify the projected number of fiscal year applicants
for enrollment in each priority category, projected healthcare
utilization and expenditures for veterans in each priority category,
appropriated funds and other revenue projected to be available for
fiscal year enrollees, and projected total expenditures for enrollees
by priority category. The determination should include consideration of
relevant internal and external factors, e.g., economic changes, changes
in medical practices, and waiting times to obtain an appointment for
care. Consistent with these criteria, the Secretary will determine
which categories of veterans are eligible to be enrolled based on the
order of priority specified in paragraph (b) of this section.
(2) Unless changed by a rulemaking document in accordance with
paragraph (c)(1) of this section, VA will enroll the priority
categories of veterans set forth in Sec. 17.36(b) beginning [effective
date of regulation], except that those veterans in subcategories (v)
and (vi) of priority category 8 are not eligible to be enrolled.
(d) * * *
(1) Application for enrollment. A veteran may apply to be enrolled
in the VA healthcare system at any time. A veteran who wishes to be
enrolled must apply by submitting a VA Form 10-10EZ to a VA medical
facility or via an Online submission at https://www.1010ez.med.va.gov/sec/vha/1010ez/.
* * * * *
(Authority: 38 U.S.C. 101, 501, 1521, 1701, 1705, 1710, 1722)
[FR Doc. E9-11400 Filed 5-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P