U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Proposed Rules Changes, 22898-22900 [E9-11324]
Download as PDF
22898
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 93 / Friday, May 15, 2009 / Notices
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
Individuals seeking to access records
about themselves contained in this
system of records should address
written inquiries to the Privacy Act
Office, Headquarters, Defense Logistics
Agency, ATTN: DGA, 8725 John J.
Kingman Road, Suite 1644, Fort Belvoir,
VA 22060–6221 or the Privacy Act
Office of the DLA field activity
involved. Official mailing addresses are
published as an appendix to DLA’s
compilation of systems of records
notices.
Written requests for information
should contain name, Social Security
Number (SSN), mailing address and
telephone number.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
The DLA rules for accessing records,
for contesting contents, and appealing
initial agency determinations are
contained in 32 CFR part 323, or may
be obtained from the Privacy Act Office,
Headquarters, Defense Logistics Agency,
ATTN: DGA, 8725 John J. Kingman
Road, Suite 1644, Fort Belvoir, VA
22060–6221.
RECORD SOURCE CATEGORIES:
Data is supplied by the individual and
public safety personnel. Data for child
identification badges is provided by the
parent.
EXEMPTIONS CLAIMED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None.
[FR Doc. E9–11354 Filed 5–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DOD–2009–OS–0061]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed
Forces Proposed Rules Changes
Department of Defense.
Notice of Proposed Changes to
the Rules of Practice and Procedure of
the United States Court of Appeals for
the Armed Forces and Implementation
of a New Electronic Filing Program.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This notice announces the
following proposed changes to Rules
19(a)(5), 20(e), 21(c)(2), 37(a), 37(b)(2),
and 40(b)(3) of the Rules of Practice and
Procedure, United States Court of
Appeals for the Armed Forces and
implementation of a new electronic
filing program for public notice and
comment. On April 30, 2009, at 74 FR
19947, the Department of Defense
published a notice of this same title.
The SUMMARY section stated that ‘‘new
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:43 May 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
language is in bold print’’ but the notice
did not contain bold print. This notice
identifies those changes made.
DATES: Comments on the proposed
changes must be received within 30
days of the date of this corrected notice.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments,
identified by docket number and/or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN)
and title by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov.
• Mail: Federal Docket Management
System Office, 1160 Defense Pentagon,
OSD Mailroom 3C843, Washington, DC
20301–1160.
Instructions: All submissions received
must include the agency name and
docket number or RIN for this Federal
Register document. The general policy
for comments and other submissions
from members of the public is to make
these submissions available for public
viewing on the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov as they are
received without change, including
personal identifiers or contact
information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
William A. DeCicco, Clerk of the Court,
telephone (202) 761–1448.
Dated: May 12, 2009.
Morgan E. Frazier,
Alternate OSD Federal Liaison Officer,
Department of Defense.
Rule 19(a)(5):
Amend Rule 19 (a)(5) by:
A. Removing the existing paragraphs
(A) and (B) which currently read:
‘‘(A) Article 62, UCMJ, appeals. In
cases involving a decision by a Court of
Criminal Appeals on appeal by the
United States under Article 62, UCMJ,
10 USC § 862, a supplement to the
petition establishing good cause in
accordance with Rule 21 shall be filed
no later than 20 days after the issuance
by the Clerk of a notice of docketing of
such a petition for grant of review. See
Rule 10(c). An appellee’s answer to the
supplement to the petition for grant of
review shall be filed no later than 10
days after the filing of such supplement.
A reply may be filed by the appellant no
later than 5 days after the filing of the
appellee’s answer.
(B) Other appeals. In all other appeal
cases, a supplement to the petition
establishing good cause in accordance
with Rule 21 shall be filed no later than
30 days after the issuance by the Clerk
of a notice of docketing of a petition for
grant of review. See Rule 10(c). An
appellee’s answer to the supplement to
the petition for grant of review may be
filed no later than 30 days after the
PO 00000
Frm 00018
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
filing of such supplement. See Rule
21(e). A reply may be filed by the
appellant no later than 10 days after the
filing of the appellee’s answer.’’
B. And by adding new paragraphs (A)
and (B) in their place, to read as follows:
(A) In all cases where the petition is
filed by counsel, a supplement to the
petition establishing good cause in
accordance with Rule 21 shall be filed
contemporaneously with the petition.
Motions for enlargement of time to file
the supplement, while disfavored, will
be granted for good cause shown. An
appellee’s answer to the supplement to
the petition, except for cases on appeal
by the United States under Article 62,
UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 862 (2000), may be
filed no later than 20 days after the
filing of the supplement. See Rule 21(e).
A reply may be filed by the appellant no
later than 5 days after the filing of
appellee’s answer. An appellee’s answer
to the supplement in a case under
appeal by the United States under
Article 62, UCMJ, may be filed no later
than 10 days after the filing of the
supplement; an appellant may file a
reply no later than 5 days after the filing
of appellee’s answer.
(B) In all cases where the petition is
filed by the appellant, a supplement to
the petition shall be filed by counsel no
later than 20 days after the issuance by
the Clerk of a notice of docketing of the
petition. See Rule 10(c). An appellee’s
answer to the supplement to the petition
and an appellant’s reply may be filed in
accordance with the time limits
contained in Rule 19(a)(5)(A).
Comment: The changes will accelerate
the case disposition process. The
accelerated time limits are accompanied
with a provision to obtain extensions for
good cause shown to address concerns
that there may be circumstances where
additional time may be justified.
Rule 20(e):
Amend Rule 20(e) by:
A. Removing the existing paragraph
(e) which currently reads:
‘‘(e) Upon issuance by the Clerk under
Rule 10(c) of a notice of docketing of a
petition for grant of review counsel for
the appellant shall file a supplement to
the petition in accordance with the
applicable time limit set forth in Rule
19(a)(5)(A) or(B), and the provisions of
Rule 21.’’
B. And by adding new paragraph (e)
in its place, to read as follows:
(e) Upon issuance by the Clerk under
Rule 10(c) of a notice of docketing of a
petition for grant of review filed
personally by an appellant, counsel for
the appellant shall file a supplement to
the petition in accordance with the
applicable time limit set forth in Rule
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 93 / Friday, May 15, 2009 / Notices
19(a)(5)(B), and the provisions of Rule
21.
Comment: This change is a
conforming amendment to bring Rule
20(e) into alignment with the change in
Rule 19(a)(5).
Rule 21(c)(2):
Amend Rule 21(c)(2) by:
A. Removing the existing paragraph
(c)(2) which currently reads:
‘‘(2) Answer/reply in other appeals.
An appellee’s answer to the supplement
to the petition for grant of review in all
other appeal cases may be filed no later
than 30 days after the filing of the
supplement; see Rule 21(e); (remainder
of paragraph is unchanged).’’
B. And by adding new paragraph
(c)(2) in its place, to read as follows:
(2) Answer/reply in other appeals. An
appellee’s answer to the supplement to
the petition for grant of review in all
other appeal cases may be filed no later
than 20 days after the filing of the
supplement; see Rule 21(e); (remainder
of paragraph is unchanged).
Comment: This change conforms Rule
21(c)(2) to the change in Rule 19(a)(5).
Rules 37(a) and 37(b)(2):
Amend Rules 37(a) and 37(b)(2) by:
A. Removing the existing paragraphs
37(a) and 37(b)(2) which currently read:
‘‘(a) Printing. Except for records of
trial and as otherwise provided by Rules
24(f) and 27(a)(4), all pleadings and
other papers relative to a case shall be
typewritten and double-spaced, printed
on one side only on white unglazed
paper, 8.5 by 11 inches in size, securely
fastened in the top left corner.
(b)(2) An original and 7 legible copies
of all pleadings or other papers relative
to a case shall be filed.’’
B. And by adding new paragraphs
37(a) and 37(b)(2) in their place, to read
as follows:
(a) Printing. Except for records of trial
and as otherwise provided by Rules
24(f) and 27(a)(4) or any order of the
Court regarding the electronic filing of
pleadings, all pleadings and other
papers relative to a case shall be
typewritten and double-spaced, printed
on one side only on white unglazed
paper, 8.5 by 11 inches in size, securely
fastened in the top left corner.
(b)(2) Except for electronically filed
pleadings, an original and 7 legible
copies of all pleadings or other papers
relative to a case shall be filed.
Comment: These changes are
proposed to account for orders of the
Court pertaining to electronic filing of
pleadings.
Rule 40(b)(3):
Amend Rule 40(b)(3) by:
A. Removing the existing paragraph
40(b)(3) which currently reads:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:43 May 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
‘‘(3) Time allowed. Each side will
normally be allotted 30 minutes to
present oral argument.’’
B. And by adding new paragraph
40(b)(3) in its place, to read as follows:
(3) Time allowed. Each side will
normally be allotted 20 minutes to
present oral argument.
Comment: This change is proposed to
bring the rule into conformance with
recent court practice.
And also by adding the following:
Proposed Order on Electronic Filing
Effective (date), the following
pleadings may be filed on paper or
electronically in accordance with the
guidelines attached to this Order:
(a) petitions for grant of review filed
by counsel under Rule 18(a)(1);
(b) supplements to petitions for grant
of review filed under Rule 21;
(c) answers (including 10-day letters
to the Clerk) and replies filed under
Rule 21(c); and
(d) motions filed under Rule 30 that
concern the pleadings described in
paragraphs (a)–(c), and replies thereto,
when such motions are filed prior to the
Court’s action granting or denying a
petition for grant of review.
It is further ordered that the Orders
pertaining to electronic filing issued on
May 8, 2003 (58 M.J. 282) and August
5, 2004 (60 M.J. 308) are hereby
rescinded, effective (date).
Proposed Guidelines for Electronic
Filing of Pleadings
1. Scope
The United States Court of Appeals
for the Armed Forces adopts the
following provisions to govern the filing
of the documents described in
paragraphs (a)–(d) of the order
(hereinafter collectively referred to as
‘‘petition documents’’):
a. This Order applies to all petition
documents filed electronically on or
after (date). An appendix to the
supplement to the petition for grant of
review (containing the decision of the
Court of Criminal Appeals, matters
submitted pursuant to United States v.
Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982)
and other required matter) is included
in this requirement to be filed
electronically unless it consists of more
than 50 pages. In such a case, the
appendix may be submitted on paper
and the supplement submitted
electronically. In lieu of submitting an
appendix in excess of 50 pages on
paper, counsel may submit it in a CD or
DVD format and note in the supplement
that it is being filed in that format under
separate cover. Record matters in the
form of video media on CD–ROM or
PO 00000
Frm 00019
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22899
DVD may be submitted in a separate
volume of the appendix that is filed in
accordance with Rule 21(b).
b. A petition for grant of review filed
personally by an appellant shall be filed
on paper as provided under Rule 20(a).
All subsequent petition documents filed
by counsel in such a case may be filed
on paper or electronically except as
provided in section 1.c of these
guidelines.
c. This Order does not provide for
electronic filing of documents
concerning other matters, such as
documents concerning certified cases;
mandatory review cases; writ-appeal
petitions; petitions for extraordinary
relief; petitions for new trial; and
petitions for reconsideration. In a case
arising under Article 67(a)(3), UCMJ,
(petitions for grant of review), the Order
permits electronic filing only with
respect to documents filed before the
Court issues an order granting or
denying review.
2. Electronic Filing Address
Counsel shall file petition and motion
documents at the following e-mail
address: (to be filled
in)@armfor.uscourts.gov.
For questions or help concerning the
electronic filing of pleadings, counsel
should contact the Clerk’s Office at
(202) 761–1448.
3. Procedure
a. The electronic filing of a petition
document shall be deemed filed as of
the date and time of the transmission of
the electronic mail message.
b. The electronic mail message shall
contain the following in the subject
block: (1) The name of the case; (2) the
docket number if a docket number has
been assigned; and (3) the words
‘‘electronic filing.’’ A description of
what is being attached will be included
in the body of the electronic mail
message.
c. The pleading shall be attached to
the electronic mail message in Portable
Document Format (PDF), and, when
printed, shall be in compliance with the
Rules of Practice and Procedure of the
Court.
d. Counsel shall send an electronic
copy of the message and all attachments
to opposing counsel to accomplish
service of the pleading under Rule 39.
This may be accomplished by listing
opposing counsel as a ‘‘cc’’ recipient of
the electronic message.
e. The pleading attached to an
electronic filing shall contain the
conformed signature (‘‘/s/’’) or digital
signature of the attorney of record. This
will comply with Rule 38.
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
22900
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 93 / Friday, May 15, 2009 / Notices
f. If a pleading is filed electronically
in accordance with this Order, the party
is not required to prepare and file
printed copies under Rules 37(a) and
37(b)(2). The Court will send a reply
electronic message to the sender
indicating receipt of the electronic
filing.
g. Classified material and material
under seal will not be filed
electronically. If such matters need to be
filed, they will be submitted to the
Court on paper as a supplemental filing
to the document in which they would
otherwise appear. In such cases, counsel
will include in the text of the electronic
mail message a notation that classified
or sealed material is being separately
submitted. The classified or sealed
material will be appropriately packaged,
marked and delivered, and will include
a notation that it accompanies an
electronic filing in the case. All
classified material will be handled in
accordance with Rule 12.
h. Counsel must refrain from
including and shall redact the following
personal data identifiers from
documents filed with the Court:
• Social security numbers
• Names of minors
• Dates of birth
• Financial account numbers
• Home addresses.
i. Upon the entry of an order granting
or denying an electronically filed
petition for grant of review, the Clerk
will electronically transmit a copy of the
order to counsel.
Comment: Appellate courts are
increasingly providing for electronic
filing of pleadings. This proposal will
permit electronic filing of pleadings at
the petition stage of cases before the
Court. By making the program optional,
the rules provide for circumstances in
which counsel may find it necessary to
file on paper.
[FR Doc. E9–11324 Filed 5–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of Navy
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
TRIDENT Support Facilities Explosives
Handling Wharf, Naval Base KitsapBangor, Silverdale, Kitsap County, WA
and To Announce Public Scoping
Meeting
Department of Navy, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102 of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:43 May 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
1969, and the regulations implemented
by the Council on Environmental
Quality (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), the
Department of Navy (Navy) announces
its intent to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate the
potential environmental impacts
associated with the construction and
operation of a proposed new Explosives
Handling Wharf (EHW) located adjacent
to, but separate from, the existing EHW
on Hood Canal, NBK-Bangor, WA, to
support TRIDENT submarines.
The proposed action consists of inwater and land-based construction
including a covered ordnance
operations area, a support building on
the wharf, and a warping wharf. A
warping wharf is a long narrow wharf
extension used to position submarines
prior to moving into the operations area
of the EHW.
As part of the U.S. Navy’s sea-based
strategic deterrence mission, the Navy
Strategic Systems Programs (SSP)
directs research, development,
manufacturing, test, evaluation, and
operational support of the TRIDENT
Fleet Ballistic Missile program. SSP is
the Action Proponent and the Navy is
the lead agency for this project.
On June 10, 2008, the Navy provided
notice in the Federal Register (73 FR
32682) of its intent to prepare an EIS for
a TRIDENT Support Facilities EHW and
to announce a public scoping meeting.
On June 30, 2008, the Navy provided
notice in the Federal Register (73 FR
36847) of its decision to cancel the June
10, 2008 Notice of Intent. The Notice of
Intent was cancelled to allow the Navy
the opportunity to review and validate
the need for the project and identify
other alternative solutions to the
proposed construction. After a thorough
review, the Navy has now revalidated
the requirement for a second EHW at
NAVBASE Kitsap Bangor.
The Navy will hold three public
scoping meetings for the purpose of
further identifying the scope of issues to
be addressed in the EIS. Federal, State,
and local agencies and the public are
invited to participate in the scoping
process for the EIS. Comments are being
solicited to help identify significant
issues or concerns related to the
proposed action, determine the scope of
issues to be addressed in the EIS, and
identify and refine alternatives to the
proposed action.
The Navy will conduct public scoping
meetings to receive oral and/or written
comments on environmental concerns
that should be addressed in the EIS. The
public scoping meetings will be
conducted in English and will be
arranged in an informal, open house
format. Attendees will be asked to sign
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in and will be directed to various
stations manned by Navy
representatives and technical staff who
will provide information and answer
questions. Several large display boards
will be located throughout the meeting
locations to assist attendees in
understanding the project and the
alternatives. A comment table, supplied
with comment sheets, will be placed in
an easily accessible and comfortable
location. Fact sheets about the project
and alternatives will be available to
participants.
DATES: Dates and Addresses: The public
scoping meetings will be held from 5:30
p.m. to 8:30 p.m. on the following dates
and locations:
1. June 23, 2009 at the Poulsbo Fire
Station Main Headquarters,
Multipurpose Room, 911 NE. Liberty
Road, Poulsbo, WA;
2. June 24, 2009 at the Port Ludlow
Fire Station 31, Training Room, 7650
Oak Bay Road, Port Ludlow, WA;
3. June 25, 2009 at the John Stanford
Center for Educational Excellence,
Auditorium, 2445 3rd Avenue South,
Seattle WA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Patrick Grzelak, Public Affairs Officer,
Department of the Navy, Strategic
Systems Programs, 2521 South Clark
Street, Suite 1000, Arlington, VA
22202–3930, telephone: 703–601–9008,
e-mail at: nbkehweis@ssp.navy.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the proposed action is to
support current and future TRIDENT
Fleet Ballistic Missile program
requirements at NAVBASE Kitsap
Bangor, WA. The proposed action is to
construct and operate a proposed new
EHW located adjacent to, but separate
from, the existing EHW on Hood Canal
to support TRIDENT submarines. A new
EHW is needed to ensure the Navy has
the facilities required to offload/load
missiles and perform routine operations
and upgrades necessary to maintain the
TRIDENT program.
As part of the U.S. Navy’s sea-based
strategic deterrence mission, the
TRIDENT submarines play a critical role
of great strategic importance for the U.S.
The Navy has only two Strategic
Weapons Facilities for TRIDENT
submarines. One in the Atlantic located
in Kings Bay, Georgia and one in the
Pacific located in Bangor, Washington.
The Bangor facility has over time been
upgraded, converted, and expanded, to
handle variations in missile systems.
Today’s modern missile is a much more
complex system, and takes more than
twice the time to maintain and handle
thus requiring additional Explosive
Handling Wharf facilities to meet the
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 93 (Friday, May 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22898-22900]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11324]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Office of the Secretary
[Docket ID: DOD-2009-OS-0061]
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Proposed Rules Changes
AGENCY: Department of Defense.
ACTION: Notice of Proposed Changes to the Rules of Practice and
Procedure of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
and Implementation of a New Electronic Filing Program.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice announces the following proposed changes to Rules
19(a)(5), 20(e), 21(c)(2), 37(a), 37(b)(2), and 40(b)(3) of the Rules
of Practice and Procedure, United States Court of Appeals for the Armed
Forces and implementation of a new electronic filing program for public
notice and comment. On April 30, 2009, at 74 FR 19947, the Department
of Defense published a notice of this same title. The SUMMARY section
stated that ``new language is in bold print'' but the notice did not
contain bold print. This notice identifies those changes made.
DATES: Comments on the proposed changes must be received within 30 days
of the date of this corrected notice.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by docket number and/or
Regulatory Information Number (RIN) and title by any of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Mail: Federal Docket Management System Office, 1160
Defense Pentagon, OSD Mailroom 3C843, Washington, DC 20301-1160.
Instructions: All submissions received must include the agency name
and docket number or RIN for this Federal Register document. The
general policy for comments and other submissions from members of the
public is to make these submissions available for public viewing on the
Internet at https://www.regulations.gov as they are received without
change, including personal identifiers or contact information.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: William A. DeCicco, Clerk of the
Court, telephone (202) 761-1448.
Dated: May 12, 2009.
Morgan E. Frazier,
Alternate OSD Federal Liaison Officer, Department of Defense.
Rule 19(a)(5):
Amend Rule 19 (a)(5) by:
A. Removing the existing paragraphs (A) and (B) which currently
read:
``(A) Article 62, UCMJ, appeals. In cases involving a decision by a
Court of Criminal Appeals on appeal by the United States under Article
62, UCMJ, 10 USC Sec. 862, a supplement to the petition establishing
good cause in accordance with Rule 21 shall be filed no later than 20
days after the issuance by the Clerk of a notice of docketing of such a
petition for grant of review. See Rule 10(c). An appellee's answer to
the supplement to the petition for grant of review shall be filed no
later than 10 days after the filing of such supplement. A reply may be
filed by the appellant no later than 5 days after the filing of the
appellee's answer.
(B) Other appeals. In all other appeal cases, a supplement to the
petition establishing good cause in accordance with Rule 21 shall be
filed no later than 30 days after the issuance by the Clerk of a notice
of docketing of a petition for grant of review. See Rule 10(c). An
appellee's answer to the supplement to the petition for grant of review
may be filed no later than 30 days after the filing of such supplement.
See Rule 21(e). A reply may be filed by the appellant no later than 10
days after the filing of the appellee's answer.''
B. And by adding new paragraphs (A) and (B) in their place, to read
as follows:
(A) In all cases where the petition is filed by counsel, a
supplement to the petition establishing good cause in accordance with
Rule 21 shall be filed contemporaneously with the petition. Motions for
enlargement of time to file the supplement, while disfavored, will be
granted for good cause shown. An appellee's answer to the supplement to
the petition, except for cases on appeal by the United States under
Article 62, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. Sec. 862 (2000), may be filed no later
than 20 days after the filing of the supplement. See Rule 21(e). A
reply may be filed by the appellant no later than 5 days after the
filing of appellee's answer. An appellee's answer to the supplement in
a case under appeal by the United States under Article 62, UCMJ, may be
filed no later than 10 days after the filing of the supplement; an
appellant may file a reply no later than 5 days after the filing of
appellee's answer.
(B) In all cases where the petition is filed by the appellant, a
supplement to the petition shall be filed by counsel no later than 20
days after the issuance by the Clerk of a notice of docketing of the
petition. See Rule 10(c). An appellee's answer to the supplement to the
petition and an appellant's reply may be filed in accordance with the
time limits contained in Rule 19(a)(5)(A).
Comment: The changes will accelerate the case disposition process.
The accelerated time limits are accompanied with a provision to obtain
extensions for good cause shown to address concerns that there may be
circumstances where additional time may be justified.
Rule 20(e):
Amend Rule 20(e) by:
A. Removing the existing paragraph (e) which currently reads:
``(e) Upon issuance by the Clerk under Rule 10(c) of a notice of
docketing of a petition for grant of review counsel for the appellant
shall file a supplement to the petition in accordance with the
applicable time limit set forth in Rule 19(a)(5)(A) or(B), and the
provisions of Rule 21.''
B. And by adding new paragraph (e) in its place, to read as
follows:
(e) Upon issuance by the Clerk under Rule 10(c) of a notice of
docketing of a petition for grant of review filed personally by an
appellant, counsel for the appellant shall file a supplement to the
petition in accordance with the applicable time limit set forth in Rule
[[Page 22899]]
19(a)(5)(B), and the provisions of Rule 21.
Comment: This change is a conforming amendment to bring Rule 20(e)
into alignment with the change in Rule 19(a)(5).
Rule 21(c)(2):
Amend Rule 21(c)(2) by:
A. Removing the existing paragraph (c)(2) which currently reads:
``(2) Answer/reply in other appeals. An appellee's answer to the
supplement to the petition for grant of review in all other appeal
cases may be filed no later than 30 days after the filing of the
supplement; see Rule 21(e); (remainder of paragraph is unchanged).''
B. And by adding new paragraph (c)(2) in its place, to read as
follows:
(2) Answer/reply in other appeals. An appellee's answer to the
supplement to the petition for grant of review in all other appeal
cases may be filed no later than 20 days after the filing of the
supplement; see Rule 21(e); (remainder of paragraph is unchanged).
Comment: This change conforms Rule 21(c)(2) to the change in Rule
19(a)(5).
Rules 37(a) and 37(b)(2):
Amend Rules 37(a) and 37(b)(2) by:
A. Removing the existing paragraphs 37(a) and 37(b)(2) which
currently read:
``(a) Printing. Except for records of trial and as otherwise
provided by Rules 24(f) and 27(a)(4), all pleadings and other papers
relative to a case shall be typewritten and double-spaced, printed on
one side only on white unglazed paper, 8.5 by 11 inches in size,
securely fastened in the top left corner.
(b)(2) An original and 7 legible copies of all pleadings or other
papers relative to a case shall be filed.''
B. And by adding new paragraphs 37(a) and 37(b)(2) in their place,
to read as follows:
(a) Printing. Except for records of trial and as otherwise provided
by Rules 24(f) and 27(a)(4) or any order of the Court regarding the
electronic filing of pleadings, all pleadings and other papers relative
to a case shall be typewritten and double-spaced, printed on one side
only on white unglazed paper, 8.5 by 11 inches in size, securely
fastened in the top left corner.
(b)(2) Except for electronically filed pleadings, an original and 7
legible copies of all pleadings or other papers relative to a case
shall be filed.
Comment: These changes are proposed to account for orders of the
Court pertaining to electronic filing of pleadings.
Rule 40(b)(3):
Amend Rule 40(b)(3) by:
A. Removing the existing paragraph 40(b)(3) which currently reads:
``(3) Time allowed. Each side will normally be allotted 30 minutes
to present oral argument.''
B. And by adding new paragraph 40(b)(3) in its place, to read as
follows:
(3) Time allowed. Each side will normally be allotted 20 minutes to
present oral argument.
Comment: This change is proposed to bring the rule into conformance
with recent court practice.
And also by adding the following:
Proposed Order on Electronic Filing
Effective (date), the following pleadings may be filed on paper or
electronically in accordance with the guidelines attached to this
Order:
(a) petitions for grant of review filed by counsel under Rule
18(a)(1);
(b) supplements to petitions for grant of review filed under Rule
21;
(c) answers (including 10-day letters to the Clerk) and replies
filed under Rule 21(c); and
(d) motions filed under Rule 30 that concern the pleadings
described in paragraphs (a)-(c), and replies thereto, when such motions
are filed prior to the Court's action granting or denying a petition
for grant of review.
It is further ordered that the Orders pertaining to electronic
filing issued on May 8, 2003 (58 M.J. 282) and August 5, 2004 (60 M.J.
308) are hereby rescinded, effective (date).
Proposed Guidelines for Electronic Filing of Pleadings
1. Scope
The United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces adopts the
following provisions to govern the filing of the documents described in
paragraphs (a)-(d) of the order (hereinafter collectively referred to
as ``petition documents''):
a. This Order applies to all petition documents filed
electronically on or after (date). An appendix to the supplement to the
petition for grant of review (containing the decision of the Court of
Criminal Appeals, matters submitted pursuant to United States v.
Grostefon, 12 M.J. 431 (C.M.A. 1982) and other required matter) is
included in this requirement to be filed electronically unless it
consists of more than 50 pages. In such a case, the appendix may be
submitted on paper and the supplement submitted electronically. In lieu
of submitting an appendix in excess of 50 pages on paper, counsel may
submit it in a CD or DVD format and note in the supplement that it is
being filed in that format under separate cover. Record matters in the
form of video media on CD-ROM or DVD may be submitted in a separate
volume of the appendix that is filed in accordance with Rule 21(b).
b. A petition for grant of review filed personally by an appellant
shall be filed on paper as provided under Rule 20(a). All subsequent
petition documents filed by counsel in such a case may be filed on
paper or electronically except as provided in section 1.c of these
guidelines.
c. This Order does not provide for electronic filing of documents
concerning other matters, such as documents concerning certified cases;
mandatory review cases; writ-appeal petitions; petitions for
extraordinary relief; petitions for new trial; and petitions for
reconsideration. In a case arising under Article 67(a)(3), UCMJ,
(petitions for grant of review), the Order permits electronic filing
only with respect to documents filed before the Court issues an order
granting or denying review.
2. Electronic Filing Address
Counsel shall file petition and motion documents at the following
e-mail address: (to be filled in)@armfor.uscourts.gov.
For questions or help concerning the electronic filing of
pleadings, counsel should contact the Clerk's Office at (202) 761-1448.
3. Procedure
a. The electronic filing of a petition document shall be deemed
filed as of the date and time of the transmission of the electronic
mail message.
b. The electronic mail message shall contain the following in the
subject block: (1) The name of the case; (2) the docket number if a
docket number has been assigned; and (3) the words ``electronic
filing.'' A description of what is being attached will be included in
the body of the electronic mail message.
c. The pleading shall be attached to the electronic mail message in
Portable Document Format (PDF), and, when printed, shall be in
compliance with the Rules of Practice and Procedure of the Court.
d. Counsel shall send an electronic copy of the message and all
attachments to opposing counsel to accomplish service of the pleading
under Rule 39. This may be accomplished by listing opposing counsel as
a ``cc'' recipient of the electronic message.
e. The pleading attached to an electronic filing shall contain the
conformed signature (``/s/'') or digital signature of the attorney of
record. This will comply with Rule 38.
[[Page 22900]]
f. If a pleading is filed electronically in accordance with this
Order, the party is not required to prepare and file printed copies
under Rules 37(a) and 37(b)(2). The Court will send a reply electronic
message to the sender indicating receipt of the electronic filing.
g. Classified material and material under seal will not be filed
electronically. If such matters need to be filed, they will be
submitted to the Court on paper as a supplemental filing to the
document in which they would otherwise appear. In such cases, counsel
will include in the text of the electronic mail message a notation that
classified or sealed material is being separately submitted. The
classified or sealed material will be appropriately packaged, marked
and delivered, and will include a notation that it accompanies an
electronic filing in the case. All classified material will be handled
in accordance with Rule 12.
h. Counsel must refrain from including and shall redact the
following personal data identifiers from documents filed with the
Court:
Social security numbers
Names of minors
Dates of birth
Financial account numbers
Home addresses.
i. Upon the entry of an order granting or denying an electronically
filed petition for grant of review, the Clerk will electronically
transmit a copy of the order to counsel.
Comment: Appellate courts are increasingly providing for electronic
filing of pleadings. This proposal will permit electronic filing of
pleadings at the petition stage of cases before the Court. By making
the program optional, the rules provide for circumstances in which
counsel may find it necessary to file on paper.
[FR Doc. E9-11324 Filed 5-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001-06-P