Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska-2010-11 and 2011-12 Subsistence Taking of Wildlife Regulations, 22867-22870 [E9-11130]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 93 / Friday, May 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
transactions with the Bank after the
effective date of its termination of
membership, the Bank shall not redeem
or repurchase any Bank stock that is
required to support the indebtedness or
the business transactions until after all
such indebtedness and business
transactions have been extinguished or
settled.
Subpart H—Reacquisition of
Membership
§ 1263.30
Readmission to membership.
Subpart I—Bank Access to Information
Reports and examinations.
As a condition precedent to Bank
membership, each member:
(a) Consents to such examinations as
the Bank or FHFA may require for
purposes of the Bank Act;
(b) Agrees that reports of
examinations by local, state or federal
agencies or institutions may be
furnished by such authorities to the
Bank or FHFA upon request;
(c) Agrees to give the Bank or the
appropriate Federal banking agency,
upon request, such information as the
Bank or the appropriate Federal banking
agency may need to compile and
publish cost of funds indices and to
publish other reports or statistical
summaries pertaining to the activities of
Bank members;
(d) Agrees to provide the Bank with
calendar year-end financial data each
year, for purposes of making the
calculation described in § 1263.22(b)(1);
and
(e) Agrees to provide the Bank with
copies of reports of condition and
operations required to be filed with the
member’s appropriate Federal banking
agency, if applicable, within 20 calendar
days of filing, as well as copies of any
annual report of condition and
operations required to be filed.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:20 May 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
§ 1263.32
Official membership insignia.
Members may display the approved
insignia of membership on their
documents, advertising and quarters,
and likewise use the words ‘‘Member
Federal Home Loan Bank System.’’
Dated: May 7, 2009.
James B. Lockhart III,
Director, Federal Housing Finance Agency.
[FR Doc. E9–11329 Filed 5–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8070–01–P
(a) In general. An institution that has
withdrawn from membership or
otherwise has had its membership
terminated and which has divested all
of its shares of Bank stock, may not be
readmitted to membership in any Bank,
or acquire any capital stock of any Bank,
for a period of 5 years from the date on
which its membership terminated and it
divested all of its shares of Bank stock.
(b) Exceptions. An institution that
transfers membership between two
Banks without interruption shall not be
deemed to have withdrawn from Bank
membership or had its membership
terminated.
§ 1263.31
Subpart J—Membership Insignia
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 242
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 100
[FWS–R7–SM–2009–0001; 70101–1261–
0000L6]
RIN 1018–AW30
Subsistence Management Regulations
for Public Lands in Alaska—2010–11
and 2011–12 Subsistence Taking of
Wildlife Regulations
AGENCIES: Forest Service, Agriculture;
Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would
establish regulations for hunting and
trapping seasons, harvest limits,
methods, and means related to taking of
wildlife for subsistence uses during the
2010–11 and 2011–12 regulatory years.
The Federal Subsistence Board
completes the biennial process of
revising subsistence hunting and
trapping regulations in even-numbered
years and subsistence fishing and
shellfish regulations in odd-numbered
years; public proposal and review
processes take place during the
preceding year. The Board also
addresses customary and traditional use
determinations during the applicable
biennial cycle. When final, the resulting
rulemaking will replace the existing
subsistence wildlife taking regulations,
which expire on June 30, 2010. This
rule would also amend the customary
and traditional use determinations of
the Federal Subsistence Board and the
general regulations on subsistence
taking of fish and wildlife.
DATES: Public meetings: The Federal
Subsistence Regional Advisory Councils
PO 00000
Frm 00027
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22867
will hold public meetings to receive
comments and make proposals to
change this proposed rule on several
dates between August 25 and October
28, 2009, and then hold another round
of public meetings to discuss and
receive comments on the proposals, and
make recommendations on the
proposals to the Federal Subsistence
Board, on several dates between
February and April, 2010. The Board
will discuss and evaluate proposed
regulatory changes during a public
meeting in Anchorage, AK, on May 4,
2010. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
for specific information on dates and
locations of the public meetings.
Public comments: Comments and
proposals to change this proposed rule
must be received or postmarked by
November 5, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Public meetings: The
Federal Subsistence Board and the
Regional Advisory Councils’ public
meetings will be held at various
locations in Alaska. See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for specific information on
dates and locations of the public
meetings.
Public comments: You may submit
comments by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• U.S. mail or hand-delivery to:
USFWS, Office of Subsistence
Management, 1011 East Tudor Road, MS
121, Attn: Theo Matuskowitz,
Anchorage, AK 99503–6199.
• Hand delivery to the Designated
Federal Official attending any of the
Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory
Council public meetings. See
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
additional information on locations of
the public meetings.
We will post all comments on https://
www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal
information you provide us (see the
Public Review Process section below for
more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Chair, Federal Subsistence Board, c/o
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Attention: Peter J. Probasco, Office of
Subsistence Management; (907) 786–
3888 or subsistence@fws.gov. For
questions specific to National Forest
System lands, contact Calvin Casipit,
Regional Subsistence Program Leader,
USDA, Forest Service, Alaska Region;
(907) 586–7918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\15MYP1.SGM
15MYP1
22868
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 93 / Friday, May 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Background
Under Title VIII of the Alaska
National Interest Lands Conservation
Act (ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111–3126),
the Secretary of the Interior and the
Secretary of Agriculture (Secretaries)
jointly implement the Federal
Subsistence Management Program. This
program grants a preference for
subsistence uses of fish and wildlife
resources on Federal public lands and
waters in Alaska. The Secretaries first
published regulations to carry out this
program in the Federal Register on May
29, 1992 (57 FR 22940). The Program
has subsequently amended these
regulations several times. Because this
program is a joint effort between Interior
and Agriculture, these regulations are
located in two titles of the Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR): Title 36,
‘‘Parks, Forests, and Public Property,’’
and Title 50, ‘‘Wildlife and Fisheries,’’
at 36 CFR 242.1–28 and 50 CFR 100.1–
28, respectively. The regulations contain
subparts as follows: Subpart A, General
Provisions; Subpart B, Program
Structure; Subpart C, Board
Determinations; and Subpart D,
Subsistence Taking of Fish and Wildlife.
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Region
Federal Subsistence Board
Consistent with subpart B of these
regulations, the Departments established
a Federal Subsistence Board to
administer the Federal Subsistence
Management Program. The Board is
made up of:
• Chair appointed by the Secretary of
the Interior with concurrence of the
Secretary of Agriculture;
• Alaska Regional Director, U.S. Fish
and Wildlife Service;
• Alaska Regional Director, U.S.
National Park Service;
• Alaska State Director, U.S. Bureau
of Land Management;
• Alaska Regional Director, U.S.
Bureau of Indian Affairs; and
• Alaska Regional Forester, U.S.
Forest Service.
Through the Board, these agencies
participate in the development of
regulations for subparts A, B, and C,
which set forth the basic program, and
they continue to work together on
regularly revising the subpart D
regulations, which, among other things,
set forth specific harvest seasons and
limits.
1—Southeast Regional Council ................................................................
2—Southcentral Regional Council ............................................................
3—Kodiak/Aleutians Regional Council .....................................................
4—Bristol Bay Regional Council ..............................................................
5—Yukon–Kuskokwim Delta Regional Council ........................................
6—Western Interior Regional Council ......................................................
7—Seward Peninsula Regional Council ...................................................
8—Northwest Arctic Regional Council .....................................................
9—Eastern Interior Regional Council .......................................................
10—North Slope Regional Council ...........................................................
During November 2009, the written
proposals to change subpart D hunting
and trapping regulations and subpart C
customary and traditional use
determinations will be compiled and
distributed for public review. During the
30-day public comment period, which is
presently scheduled to end on
December 31, 2009, written public
comments will be accepted on the
distributed proposals.
The Board, through the Regional
Councils, will hold a second series of
meetings in February through April
2010, to receive comments on specific
proposals and to develop
recommendations to the Board. Meeting
dates and locations will be published in
the Federal Register prior to those
meetings:
A notice will be published of specific
dates, times, and meeting locations in
local and statewide newspapers prior to
both series of meetings. Locations and
dates may change based on weather or
local circumstances. The amount of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:20 May 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
Frm 00028
Fmt 4702
In administering the program, the
Secretaries divided Alaska into 10
subsistence resource regions, each of
which is represented by a Regional
Council. The Regional Councils provide
a forum for rural residents with personal
knowledge of local conditions and
resource requirements to have a
meaningful role in the subsistence
management of fish and wildlife on
Federal public lands in Alaska. The
Regional Council members represent
varied geographical, cultural, and user
diversity within each region.
Public Review Process—Comments,
Proposals, and Public Meetings
The Regional Councils have a
substantial role in reviewing this
proposed rule and making
recommendations for the final rule. The
Federal Subsistence Board (Board),
through the Regional Councils, will
hold meetings on this proposed rule at
the following locations in Alaska, on the
following dates:
Yakutat ..................................................
Cooper Landing .....................................
Kodiak ...................................................
Naknek ..................................................
TBA .......................................................
Aniak .....................................................
Nome .....................................................
Kotzebue ...............................................
Central ...................................................
Barrow ...................................................
work on each Regional Council’s agenda
determines the length of each Regional
Council meeting.
The Board will discuss and evaluate
proposed changes to the subsistence
management regulations during a public
meeting scheduled to be held in
Anchorage, AK, on May 4, 2010. The
Council Chairs, or their designated
representatives, will present their
respective Councils’ recommendations
at the Board meeting. Additional oral
testimony may be provided on specific
proposals before the Board at that time.
At that public meeting, the Board will
deliberate and take final action on
proposals received that request changes
to this proposed rule.
Proposals to the Board to modify
wildlife harvest regulations and
customary and traditional use
determinations must include the
following information:
a. Name, address, and telephone
number of the requestor;
PO 00000
Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory
Councils
Sfmt 4702
October 6, 2009.
October 13, 2009.
September 10, 2009.
October 27, 2009.
October 1, 2009.
October 6, 2009.
October 1, 2009.
September 2, 2009.
October 13, 2009.
August 25, 2009.
b. Each section and/or paragraph
designation in this proposed rule for
which changes are suggested;
c. A statement explaining why each
change is necessary;
d. Proposed wording changes; and
e. Any additional information that
you believe will help the Board in
evaluating the proposed change.
The Board rejects proposals that fail
to include the above information, or
proposals that are beyond the scope of
authorities in § l .24, subpart C (the
regulations governing customary and
traditional use determinations), and
§§ l .25, and l .26, subpart D (the
general and specific regulations
governing the subsistence take of
wildlife). During the May 4, 2010,
meeting, the Board may defer review
and action on some proposals to allow
time for local cooperative planning
efforts, or to acquire additional needed
information. The Board may elect to
defer taking action on any given
proposal if the workload of staff,
E:\FR\FM\15MYP1.SGM
15MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 93 / Friday, May 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
Regional Councils, or the Board
becomes excessive. These deferrals may
be based on recommendations by the
affected Regional Council(s) or staff
members, or on the basis of the Board’s
intention to do least harm to the
subsistence user and the resource
involved. The Board may consider and
act on alternatives that address the
intent of a proposal while differing in
approach.
Tribal Consultation and Comment
As expressed in Executive Order
13175, ‘‘Consultation and Coordination
with Indian Tribal Governments,’’ the
Federal officials that have been
delegated authority by the Secretaries
are committed to honoring the unique
government-to-government political
relationship that exists between the
Federal Government and Federally
Recognized Indian tribes (tribes) as
listed in 73 FR 18533 (April 4, 2008).
The Alaska National Interest Lands
Conservation Act does not specifically
provide rights to tribes for the
subsistence taking of wildlife, fish, and
shellfish. However, because tribal
members are affected by subsistence
fishing, hunting, and trapping
regulations, the Secretaries have elected
to provide tribes an opportunity to
consult on this rule.
The Secretaries will engage in
outreach efforts for this rule, including
a notification letter, to ensure that tribes
are advised of the mechanisms by which
they can participate. The Board
provides a variety of opportunities for
consultation: Proposing changes to the
existing rule; commenting on proposed
changes to the existing rule; engaging in
dialogue at the Regional Advisory
Council meetings; engaging in dialogue
at the Board’s meetings; and providing
input in person, by mail, email, or
phone at any time during the rulemaking process. The Secretaries will
commit to efficiently and adequately
reviewing the government-togovernment consultation process with
regard to subsistence rulemaking.
The Board will consider tribes’
information, input, and
recommendations, and address their
concerns as much as practicable.
However, in keeping with ANILCA
§ 805(c), the Board shall follow
recommendations of the Regional
Advisory Councils for the taking of fish
and wildlife unless their
recommendation is determined to be not
supported by substantial evidence,
violates recognized principles of fish
and wildlife conservation, or would be
detrimental to the satisfaction of
subsistence needs. The Board will
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:20 May 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
inform the tribes how their
recommendations were considered.
Developing the 2010–12 Wildlife
Seasons and Harvest Limit Regulations
Subpart D regulations are subject to
periodic review and revision. The
Federal Subsistence Board completes
the biennial process of revising
subsistence hunting and trapping
regulations in even-numbered years and
subsistence fishing and shellfish
regulations in odd-numbered years;
public proposal and review processes
take place during the preceding year.
The Board also addresses customary and
traditional use determinations during
the applicable biennial cycle.
The text of the final rule published
June 24, 2008 (73 FR 35726) for the
2008–10 subparts C and D regulations is
the text of this proposed rule. These
regulations will take effect on July 1,
2010, unless subsequent Board action
changes elements as a result of the
public review process outlined above in
this document.
Compliance With Statutory and
Regulatory Authorities
National Environmental Policy Act
A Draft Environmental Impact
Statement (DEIS) that described four
alternatives for developing a Federal
Subsistence Management Program was
distributed for public comment on
October 7, 1991. The Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS)
was published on February 28, 1992.
The Record of Decision (ROD) on
Subsistence Management for Federal
Public Lands in Alaska was signed April
6, 1992. The selected alternative in the
FEIS (Alternative IV) defined the
administrative framework of an annual
regulatory cycle for subsistence
regulations.
A 1997 environmental assessment
dealt with the expansion of Federal
jurisdiction over fisheries and is
available at the office listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The
Secretary of the Interior, with
concurrence of the Secretary of
Agriculture, determined that expansion
of Federal jurisdiction does not
constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the human
environment and, therefore, signed a
Finding of No Significant Impact.
Section 810 of ANILCA
An ANILCA Section 810 analysis was
completed as part of the FEIS process on
the Federal Subsistence Management
Program. The intent of all Federal
subsistence regulations is to accord
subsistence uses of fish and wildlife on
PO 00000
Frm 00029
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22869
public lands a priority over the taking
of fish and wildlife on such lands for
other purposes, unless restriction is
necessary to conserve healthy fish and
wildlife populations. The final section
810 analysis determination appeared in
the April 6, 1992, ROD and concluded
that the Federal Subsistence
Management Program, under
Alternative IV with an annual process
for setting subsistence regulations, may
have some local impacts on subsistence
uses, but will not likely restrict
subsistence uses significantly.
During the subsequent environmental
assessment process for extending
fisheries jurisdiction, an evaluation of
the effects of this rule was conducted in
accordance with section 810. That
evaluation also supported the
Secretaries’ determination that the rule
will not reach the ‘‘may significantly
restrict’’ threshold that would require
notice and hearings under ANILCA
section 810(a).
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection
requirements contained in this rule have
been approved by the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) under
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and assigned
OMB control number 1018–0075, which
expires October 31, 2009. We may not
conduct or sponsor, and you are not
required to respond to, a collection of
information unless it displays a current
valid OMB control number.
Regulatory Planning and Review
(Executive Order 12866)
The Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) has determined that this rule is
not significant and has not reviewed
this rule under Executive Order 12866.
OMB bases its determination upon the
following four criteria:
a. Whether the rule will have an
annual effect of $100 million or more on
the economy or adversely affect an
economic sector, productivity, jobs, the
environment, or other units of the
government.
b. Whether the rule will create
inconsistencies with other agencies’
actions.
c. Whether the rule will materially
affect entitlements, grants, user fees,
loan programs, or the rights and
obligations of their recipients.
d. Whether the rule raises novel legal
or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980
(5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) requires
preparation of flexibility analyses for
rules that will have a significant effect
E:\FR\FM\15MYP1.SGM
15MYP1
22870
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 93 / Friday, May 15, 2009 / Proposed Rules
on a substantial number of small
entities, which include small
businesses, organizations, or
governmental jurisdictions. In general,
the resources to be harvested under this
rule are already being harvested and
consumed by the local harvester and do
not result in an additional dollar benefit
to the economy. However, we estimate
that 2 million pounds of meat are
harvested by subsistence users annually
and, if given an estimated dollar value
of $3.00 per pound, this amount would
equate to about $6 million in food value
statewide. Based upon the amounts and
values cited above, the Departments
certify that this rulemaking will not
have a significant economic effect on a
substantial number of small entities
within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act
Under the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act (5 U.S.C. 801
et seq.), this rule is not a major rule. It
does not have an effect on the economy
of $100 million or more, will not cause
a major increase in costs or prices for
consumers, and does not have
significant adverse effects on
competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability
of U.S.-based enterprises to compete
with foreign-based enterprises.
Executive Order 12630
Title VIII of ANILCA requires the
Secretaries to administer a subsistence
priority on public lands. The scope of
this program is limited by definition to
certain public lands. Likewise, these
regulations have no potential takings of
private property implications as defined
by Executive Order 12630.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Secretaries have determined and
certify pursuant to the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et
seq., that this rulemaking will not
impose a cost of $100 million or more
in any given year on local or State
governments or private entities. The
implementation of this rule is by
Federal agencies and there is no cost
imposed on any State or local entities or
tribal governments.
Executive Order 12988
The Secretaries have determined that
these regulations meet the applicable
standards provided in Sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988,
regarding civil justice reform.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:20 May 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
Executive Order 13132
List of Subjects
In accordance with Executive Order
13132, the rule does not have sufficient
Federalism implications to warrant the
preparation of a Federalism Assessment.
Title VIII of ANILCA precludes the State
from exercising subsistence
management authority over fish and
wildlife resources on Federal lands
unless it meets certain requirements.
36 CFR Part 242
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
Executive Order 13175
The Alaska National Interest Lands
Conservation Act does not specifically
provide rights to tribes for the
subsistence taking of wildlife, fish, and
shellfish. And while, for this rule, EO
13175 does not require the agencies to
consult with tribes, the Secretaries have
elected to provide tribes an opportunity
to consult on this rule. The Board will
provide a variety of opportunities for
consultation through: Proposing
changes to the existing rule;
commenting on proposed changes to the
existing rule; engaging in dialogue at the
Regional Advisory Council meetings;
engaging in dialogue at the Board’s
meetings; and providing input in
person, by mail, e-mail, or phone at any
time during the rulemaking process.
50 CFR Part 100
Administrative practice and
procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Wildlife.
For the reasons set out in the
preamble, the Federal Subsistence
Board proposes to amend 36 CFR 242
and 50 CFR 100 for the 2010–11 and
2011–12 regulatory years.
Dated: May 4, 2009.
Peter J. Probasco,
Acting Chair, Federal Subsistence Board.
Dated: May 1, 2009.
Calvin Casipit,
Acting Subsistence Program Leader, USDAForest Service.
[FR Doc. E9–11130 Filed 5–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P, 4310–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
Executive Order 13211
On May 18, 2001, the President issued
Executive Order 13211 on regulations
that significantly affect energy supply,
distribution, or use. This Executive
Order requires agencies to prepare
Statements of Energy Effects when
undertaking certain actions. This rule is
not a significant regulatory action under
Executive Order 13211, affecting energy
supply, distribution, or use, and no
Statement of Energy Effects is required.
Drafting Information
Theo Matuskowitz drafted these
regulations under the guidance of Peter
J. Probasco of the Office of Subsistence
Management, Alaska Regional Office,
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service,
Anchorage, Alaska. Additional
assistance was provided by:
• Daniel Sharp, Alaska State Office,
Bureau of Land Management;
• Sandy Rabinowitch and Nancy
Swanton, Alaska Regional Office,
National Park Service;
• Drs. Warren Eastland and Glenn
Chen, Alaska Regional Office, Bureau of
Indian Affairs;
• Jerry Berg and Carl Jack, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service; and
• Calvin Casipit, Alaska Regional
Office, U.S. Forest Service.
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
50 CFR Part 17
[FWS–R1–ES–2009–0005; 92220–1113–
0000–C6]
RIN 1018–AW42
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife
and Plants; Proposed Rule To
Reclassify the Oregon Chub
(Oregonichthys crameri) From
Endangered to Threatened
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
SUMMARY: Under the authority of the
Endangered Species Act of 1973, as
amended (Act), we, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), propose to
reclassify the Oregon chub
(Oregonichthys crameri) from
endangered to threatened. This proposal
is based on a thorough review of the
best available scientific data, which
indicate that the species’ status has
improved such that it is not currently in
danger of extinction throughout all or a
significant portion of its range. We seek
information, data, and comments from
the public regarding the Oregon chub
and this proposal.
DATES: We will accept comments
received on or before July 14, 2009.
Public hearing requests must be
received by June 29, 2009.
E:\FR\FM\15MYP1.SGM
15MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 93 (Friday, May 15, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22867-22870]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11130]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
36 CFR Part 242
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
50 CFR Part 100
[FWS-R7-SM-2009-0001; 70101-1261-0000L6]
RIN 1018-AW30
Subsistence Management Regulations for Public Lands in Alaska--
2010-11 and 2011-12 Subsistence Taking of Wildlife Regulations
AGENCIES: Forest Service, Agriculture; Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This proposed rule would establish regulations for hunting and
trapping seasons, harvest limits, methods, and means related to taking
of wildlife for subsistence uses during the 2010-11 and 2011-12
regulatory years. The Federal Subsistence Board completes the biennial
process of revising subsistence hunting and trapping regulations in
even-numbered years and subsistence fishing and shellfish regulations
in odd-numbered years; public proposal and review processes take place
during the preceding year. The Board also addresses customary and
traditional use determinations during the applicable biennial cycle.
When final, the resulting rulemaking will replace the existing
subsistence wildlife taking regulations, which expire on June 30, 2010.
This rule would also amend the customary and traditional use
determinations of the Federal Subsistence Board and the general
regulations on subsistence taking of fish and wildlife.
DATES: Public meetings: The Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory
Councils will hold public meetings to receive comments and make
proposals to change this proposed rule on several dates between August
25 and October 28, 2009, and then hold another round of public meetings
to discuss and receive comments on the proposals, and make
recommendations on the proposals to the Federal Subsistence Board, on
several dates between February and April, 2010. The Board will discuss
and evaluate proposed regulatory changes during a public meeting in
Anchorage, AK, on May 4, 2010. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for
specific information on dates and locations of the public meetings.
Public comments: Comments and proposals to change this proposed
rule must be received or postmarked by November 5, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Public meetings: The Federal Subsistence Board and the
Regional Advisory Councils' public meetings will be held at various
locations in Alaska. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for specific
information on dates and locations of the public meetings.
Public comments: You may submit comments by one of the following
methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
U.S. mail or hand-delivery to: USFWS, Office of
Subsistence Management, 1011 East Tudor Road, MS 121, Attn: Theo
Matuskowitz, Anchorage, AK 99503-6199.
Hand delivery to the Designated Federal Official attending
any of the Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory Council public
meetings. See SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION for additional information on
locations of the public meetings.
We will post all comments on https://www.regulations.gov. This generally
means that we will post any personal information you provide us (see
the Public Review Process section below for more information).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Chair, Federal Subsistence Board, c/o
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Attention: Peter J. Probasco, Office of
Subsistence Management; (907) 786-3888 or subsistence@fws.gov. For
questions specific to National Forest System lands, contact Calvin
Casipit, Regional Subsistence Program Leader, USDA, Forest Service,
Alaska Region; (907) 586-7918.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 22868]]
Background
Under Title VIII of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation
Act (ANILCA) (16 U.S.C. 3111-3126), the Secretary of the Interior and
the Secretary of Agriculture (Secretaries) jointly implement the
Federal Subsistence Management Program. This program grants a
preference for subsistence uses of fish and wildlife resources on
Federal public lands and waters in Alaska. The Secretaries first
published regulations to carry out this program in the Federal Register
on May 29, 1992 (57 FR 22940). The Program has subsequently amended
these regulations several times. Because this program is a joint effort
between Interior and Agriculture, these regulations are located in two
titles of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR): Title 36, ``Parks,
Forests, and Public Property,'' and Title 50, ``Wildlife and
Fisheries,'' at 36 CFR 242.1-28 and 50 CFR 100.1-28, respectively. The
regulations contain subparts as follows: Subpart A, General Provisions;
Subpart B, Program Structure; Subpart C, Board Determinations; and
Subpart D, Subsistence Taking of Fish and Wildlife.
Federal Subsistence Board
Consistent with subpart B of these regulations, the Departments
established a Federal Subsistence Board to administer the Federal
Subsistence Management Program. The Board is made up of:
Chair appointed by the Secretary of the Interior with
concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture;
Alaska Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service;
Alaska Regional Director, U.S. National Park Service;
Alaska State Director, U.S. Bureau of Land Management;
Alaska Regional Director, U.S. Bureau of Indian Affairs;
and
Alaska Regional Forester, U.S. Forest Service.
Through the Board, these agencies participate in the development of
regulations for subparts A, B, and C, which set forth the basic
program, and they continue to work together on regularly revising the
subpart D regulations, which, among other things, set forth specific
harvest seasons and limits.
Federal Subsistence Regional Advisory Councils
In administering the program, the Secretaries divided Alaska into
10 subsistence resource regions, each of which is represented by a
Regional Council. The Regional Councils provide a forum for rural
residents with personal knowledge of local conditions and resource
requirements to have a meaningful role in the subsistence management of
fish and wildlife on Federal public lands in Alaska. The Regional
Council members represent varied geographical, cultural, and user
diversity within each region.
Public Review Process--Comments, Proposals, and Public Meetings
The Regional Councils have a substantial role in reviewing this
proposed rule and making recommendations for the final rule. The
Federal Subsistence Board (Board), through the Regional Councils, will
hold meetings on this proposed rule at the following locations in
Alaska, on the following dates:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Region 1--Southeast Regional Yakutat........ October 6, 2009.
Council.
Region 2--Southcentral Cooper Landing. October 13, 2009.
Regional Council.
Region 3--Kodiak/Aleutians Kodiak......... September 10, 2009.
Regional Council.
Region 4--Bristol Bay Naknek......... October 27, 2009.
Regional Council.
Region 5--Yukon-Kuskokwim TBA............ October 1, 2009.
Delta Regional Council.
Region 6--Western Interior Aniak.......... October 6, 2009.
Regional Council.
Region 7--Seward Peninsula Nome........... October 1, 2009.
Regional Council.
Region 8--Northwest Arctic Kotzebue....... September 2, 2009.
Regional Council.
Region 9--Eastern Interior Central........ October 13, 2009.
Regional Council.
Region 10--North Slope Barrow......... August 25, 2009.
Regional Council.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
During November 2009, the written proposals to change subpart D hunting
and trapping regulations and subpart C customary and traditional use
determinations will be compiled and distributed for public review.
During the 30-day public comment period, which is presently scheduled
to end on December 31, 2009, written public comments will be accepted
on the distributed proposals.
The Board, through the Regional Councils, will hold a second series
of meetings in February through April 2010, to receive comments on
specific proposals and to develop recommendations to the Board. Meeting
dates and locations will be published in the Federal Register prior to
those meetings:
A notice will be published of specific dates, times, and meeting
locations in local and statewide newspapers prior to both series of
meetings. Locations and dates may change based on weather or local
circumstances. The amount of work on each Regional Council's agenda
determines the length of each Regional Council meeting.
The Board will discuss and evaluate proposed changes to the
subsistence management regulations during a public meeting scheduled to
be held in Anchorage, AK, on May 4, 2010. The Council Chairs, or their
designated representatives, will present their respective Councils'
recommendations at the Board meeting. Additional oral testimony may be
provided on specific proposals before the Board at that time. At that
public meeting, the Board will deliberate and take final action on
proposals received that request changes to this proposed rule.
Proposals to the Board to modify wildlife harvest regulations and
customary and traditional use determinations must include the following
information:
a. Name, address, and telephone number of the requestor;
b. Each section and/or paragraph designation in this proposed rule
for which changes are suggested;
c. A statement explaining why each change is necessary;
d. Proposed wording changes; and
e. Any additional information that you believe will help the Board
in evaluating the proposed change.
The Board rejects proposals that fail to include the above
information, or proposals that are beyond the scope of authorities in
Sec. -- .24, subpart C (the regulations governing customary and
traditional use determinations), and Sec. Sec. -- .25, and -- .26,
subpart D (the general and specific regulations governing the
subsistence take of wildlife). During the May 4, 2010, meeting, the
Board may defer review and action on some proposals to allow time for
local cooperative planning efforts, or to acquire additional needed
information. The Board may elect to defer taking action on any given
proposal if the workload of staff,
[[Page 22869]]
Regional Councils, or the Board becomes excessive. These deferrals may
be based on recommendations by the affected Regional Council(s) or
staff members, or on the basis of the Board's intention to do least
harm to the subsistence user and the resource involved. The Board may
consider and act on alternatives that address the intent of a proposal
while differing in approach.
Tribal Consultation and Comment
As expressed in Executive Order 13175, ``Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments,'' the Federal officials
that have been delegated authority by the Secretaries are committed to
honoring the unique government-to-government political relationship
that exists between the Federal Government and Federally Recognized
Indian tribes (tribes) as listed in 73 FR 18533 (April 4, 2008). The
Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act does not specifically
provide rights to tribes for the subsistence taking of wildlife, fish,
and shellfish. However, because tribal members are affected by
subsistence fishing, hunting, and trapping regulations, the Secretaries
have elected to provide tribes an opportunity to consult on this rule.
The Secretaries will engage in outreach efforts for this rule,
including a notification letter, to ensure that tribes are advised of
the mechanisms by which they can participate. The Board provides a
variety of opportunities for consultation: Proposing changes to the
existing rule; commenting on proposed changes to the existing rule;
engaging in dialogue at the Regional Advisory Council meetings;
engaging in dialogue at the Board's meetings; and providing input in
person, by mail, email, or phone at any time during the rule-making
process. The Secretaries will commit to efficiently and adequately
reviewing the government-to-government consultation process with regard
to subsistence rulemaking.
The Board will consider tribes' information, input, and
recommendations, and address their concerns as much as practicable.
However, in keeping with ANILCA Sec. 805(c), the Board shall follow
recommendations of the Regional Advisory Councils for the taking of
fish and wildlife unless their recommendation is determined to be not
supported by substantial evidence, violates recognized principles of
fish and wildlife conservation, or would be detrimental to the
satisfaction of subsistence needs. The Board will inform the tribes how
their recommendations were considered.
Developing the 2010-12 Wildlife Seasons and Harvest Limit Regulations
Subpart D regulations are subject to periodic review and revision.
The Federal Subsistence Board completes the biennial process of
revising subsistence hunting and trapping regulations in even-numbered
years and subsistence fishing and shellfish regulations in odd-numbered
years; public proposal and review processes take place during the
preceding year. The Board also addresses customary and traditional use
determinations during the applicable biennial cycle.
The text of the final rule published June 24, 2008 (73 FR 35726)
for the 2008-10 subparts C and D regulations is the text of this
proposed rule. These regulations will take effect on July 1, 2010,
unless subsequent Board action changes elements as a result of the
public review process outlined above in this document.
Compliance With Statutory and Regulatory Authorities
National Environmental Policy Act
A Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) that described four
alternatives for developing a Federal Subsistence Management Program
was distributed for public comment on October 7, 1991. The Final
Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) was published on February 28,
1992. The Record of Decision (ROD) on Subsistence Management for
Federal Public Lands in Alaska was signed April 6, 1992. The selected
alternative in the FEIS (Alternative IV) defined the administrative
framework of an annual regulatory cycle for subsistence regulations.
A 1997 environmental assessment dealt with the expansion of Federal
jurisdiction over fisheries and is available at the office listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. The Secretary of the Interior, with
concurrence of the Secretary of Agriculture, determined that expansion
of Federal jurisdiction does not constitute a major Federal action
significantly affecting the human environment and, therefore, signed a
Finding of No Significant Impact.
Section 810 of ANILCA
An ANILCA Section 810 analysis was completed as part of the FEIS
process on the Federal Subsistence Management Program. The intent of
all Federal subsistence regulations is to accord subsistence uses of
fish and wildlife on public lands a priority over the taking of fish
and wildlife on such lands for other purposes, unless restriction is
necessary to conserve healthy fish and wildlife populations. The final
section 810 analysis determination appeared in the April 6, 1992, ROD
and concluded that the Federal Subsistence Management Program, under
Alternative IV with an annual process for setting subsistence
regulations, may have some local impacts on subsistence uses, but will
not likely restrict subsistence uses significantly.
During the subsequent environmental assessment process for
extending fisheries jurisdiction, an evaluation of the effects of this
rule was conducted in accordance with section 810. That evaluation also
supported the Secretaries' determination that the rule will not reach
the ``may significantly restrict'' threshold that would require notice
and hearings under ANILCA section 810(a).
Paperwork Reduction Act
The information collection requirements contained in this rule have
been approved by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) and assigned
OMB control number 1018-0075, which expires October 31, 2009. We may
not conduct or sponsor, and you are not required to respond to, a
collection of information unless it displays a current valid OMB
control number.
Regulatory Planning and Review (Executive Order 12866)
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has determined that this
rule is not significant and has not reviewed this rule under Executive
Order 12866. OMB bases its determination upon the following four
criteria:
a. Whether the rule will have an annual effect of $100 million or
more on the economy or adversely affect an economic sector,
productivity, jobs, the environment, or other units of the government.
b. Whether the rule will create inconsistencies with other
agencies' actions.
c. Whether the rule will materially affect entitlements, grants,
user fees, loan programs, or the rights and obligations of their
recipients.
d. Whether the rule raises novel legal or policy issues.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Regulatory Flexibility Act of 1980 (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.)
requires preparation of flexibility analyses for rules that will have a
significant effect
[[Page 22870]]
on a substantial number of small entities, which include small
businesses, organizations, or governmental jurisdictions. In general,
the resources to be harvested under this rule are already being
harvested and consumed by the local harvester and do not result in an
additional dollar benefit to the economy. However, we estimate that 2
million pounds of meat are harvested by subsistence users annually and,
if given an estimated dollar value of $3.00 per pound, this amount
would equate to about $6 million in food value statewide. Based upon
the amounts and values cited above, the Departments certify that this
rulemaking will not have a significant economic effect on a substantial
number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act.
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
Under the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act (5
U.S.C. 801 et seq.), this rule is not a major rule. It does not have an
effect on the economy of $100 million or more, will not cause a major
increase in costs or prices for consumers, and does not have
significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment,
productivity, innovation, or the ability of U.S.-based enterprises to
compete with foreign-based enterprises.
Executive Order 12630
Title VIII of ANILCA requires the Secretaries to administer a
subsistence priority on public lands. The scope of this program is
limited by definition to certain public lands. Likewise, these
regulations have no potential takings of private property implications
as defined by Executive Order 12630.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Secretaries have determined and certify pursuant to the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act, 2 U.S.C. 1502 et seq., that this
rulemaking will not impose a cost of $100 million or more in any given
year on local or State governments or private entities. The
implementation of this rule is by Federal agencies and there is no cost
imposed on any State or local entities or tribal governments.
Executive Order 12988
The Secretaries have determined that these regulations meet the
applicable standards provided in Sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive
Order 12988, regarding civil justice reform.
Executive Order 13132
In accordance with Executive Order 13132, the rule does not have
sufficient Federalism implications to warrant the preparation of a
Federalism Assessment. Title VIII of ANILCA precludes the State from
exercising subsistence management authority over fish and wildlife
resources on Federal lands unless it meets certain requirements.
Executive Order 13175
The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act does not
specifically provide rights to tribes for the subsistence taking of
wildlife, fish, and shellfish. And while, for this rule, EO 13175 does
not require the agencies to consult with tribes, the Secretaries have
elected to provide tribes an opportunity to consult on this rule. The
Board will provide a variety of opportunities for consultation through:
Proposing changes to the existing rule; commenting on proposed changes
to the existing rule; engaging in dialogue at the Regional Advisory
Council meetings; engaging in dialogue at the Board's meetings; and
providing input in person, by mail, e-mail, or phone at any time during
the rulemaking process.
Executive Order 13211
On May 18, 2001, the President issued Executive Order 13211 on
regulations that significantly affect energy supply, distribution, or
use. This Executive Order requires agencies to prepare Statements of
Energy Effects when undertaking certain actions. This rule is not a
significant regulatory action under Executive Order 13211, affecting
energy supply, distribution, or use, and no Statement of Energy Effects
is required.
Drafting Information
Theo Matuskowitz drafted these regulations under the guidance of
Peter J. Probasco of the Office of Subsistence Management, Alaska
Regional Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Anchorage, Alaska.
Additional assistance was provided by:
Daniel Sharp, Alaska State Office, Bureau of Land
Management;
Sandy Rabinowitch and Nancy Swanton, Alaska Regional
Office, National Park Service;
Drs. Warren Eastland and Glenn Chen, Alaska Regional
Office, Bureau of Indian Affairs;
Jerry Berg and Carl Jack, Alaska Regional Office, U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service; and
Calvin Casipit, Alaska Regional Office, U.S. Forest
Service.
List of Subjects
36 CFR Part 242
Administrative practice and procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wildlife.
50 CFR Part 100
Administrative practice and procedure, Alaska, Fish, National
forests, Public lands, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements,
Wildlife.
For the reasons set out in the preamble, the Federal Subsistence
Board proposes to amend 36 CFR 242 and 50 CFR 100 for the 2010-11 and
2011-12 regulatory years.
Dated: May 4, 2009.
Peter J. Probasco,
Acting Chair, Federal Subsistence Board.
Dated: May 1, 2009.
Calvin Casipit,
Acting Subsistence Program Leader, USDA-Forest Service.
[FR Doc. E9-11130 Filed 5-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-11-P, 4310-55-P