Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for TRIDENT Support Facilities Explosives Handling Wharf, Naval Base Kitsap-Bangor, Silverdale, Kitsap County, WA and To Announce Public Scoping Meeting, 22900-22901 [E9-11004]
Download as PDF
22900
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 93 / Friday, May 15, 2009 / Notices
f. If a pleading is filed electronically
in accordance with this Order, the party
is not required to prepare and file
printed copies under Rules 37(a) and
37(b)(2). The Court will send a reply
electronic message to the sender
indicating receipt of the electronic
filing.
g. Classified material and material
under seal will not be filed
electronically. If such matters need to be
filed, they will be submitted to the
Court on paper as a supplemental filing
to the document in which they would
otherwise appear. In such cases, counsel
will include in the text of the electronic
mail message a notation that classified
or sealed material is being separately
submitted. The classified or sealed
material will be appropriately packaged,
marked and delivered, and will include
a notation that it accompanies an
electronic filing in the case. All
classified material will be handled in
accordance with Rule 12.
h. Counsel must refrain from
including and shall redact the following
personal data identifiers from
documents filed with the Court:
• Social security numbers
• Names of minors
• Dates of birth
• Financial account numbers
• Home addresses.
i. Upon the entry of an order granting
or denying an electronically filed
petition for grant of review, the Clerk
will electronically transmit a copy of the
order to counsel.
Comment: Appellate courts are
increasingly providing for electronic
filing of pleadings. This proposal will
permit electronic filing of pleadings at
the petition stage of cases before the
Court. By making the program optional,
the rules provide for circumstances in
which counsel may find it necessary to
file on paper.
[FR Doc. E9–11324 Filed 5–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of Navy
Notice of Intent To Prepare an
Environmental Impact Statement for
TRIDENT Support Facilities Explosives
Handling Wharf, Naval Base KitsapBangor, Silverdale, Kitsap County, WA
and To Announce Public Scoping
Meeting
Department of Navy, DoD.
Notice.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102 of the
National Environmental Policy Act of
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:43 May 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
1969, and the regulations implemented
by the Council on Environmental
Quality (40 CFR parts 1500–1508), the
Department of Navy (Navy) announces
its intent to prepare an Environmental
Impact Statement (EIS) to evaluate the
potential environmental impacts
associated with the construction and
operation of a proposed new Explosives
Handling Wharf (EHW) located adjacent
to, but separate from, the existing EHW
on Hood Canal, NBK-Bangor, WA, to
support TRIDENT submarines.
The proposed action consists of inwater and land-based construction
including a covered ordnance
operations area, a support building on
the wharf, and a warping wharf. A
warping wharf is a long narrow wharf
extension used to position submarines
prior to moving into the operations area
of the EHW.
As part of the U.S. Navy’s sea-based
strategic deterrence mission, the Navy
Strategic Systems Programs (SSP)
directs research, development,
manufacturing, test, evaluation, and
operational support of the TRIDENT
Fleet Ballistic Missile program. SSP is
the Action Proponent and the Navy is
the lead agency for this project.
On June 10, 2008, the Navy provided
notice in the Federal Register (73 FR
32682) of its intent to prepare an EIS for
a TRIDENT Support Facilities EHW and
to announce a public scoping meeting.
On June 30, 2008, the Navy provided
notice in the Federal Register (73 FR
36847) of its decision to cancel the June
10, 2008 Notice of Intent. The Notice of
Intent was cancelled to allow the Navy
the opportunity to review and validate
the need for the project and identify
other alternative solutions to the
proposed construction. After a thorough
review, the Navy has now revalidated
the requirement for a second EHW at
NAVBASE Kitsap Bangor.
The Navy will hold three public
scoping meetings for the purpose of
further identifying the scope of issues to
be addressed in the EIS. Federal, State,
and local agencies and the public are
invited to participate in the scoping
process for the EIS. Comments are being
solicited to help identify significant
issues or concerns related to the
proposed action, determine the scope of
issues to be addressed in the EIS, and
identify and refine alternatives to the
proposed action.
The Navy will conduct public scoping
meetings to receive oral and/or written
comments on environmental concerns
that should be addressed in the EIS. The
public scoping meetings will be
conducted in English and will be
arranged in an informal, open house
format. Attendees will be asked to sign
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
in and will be directed to various
stations manned by Navy
representatives and technical staff who
will provide information and answer
questions. Several large display boards
will be located throughout the meeting
locations to assist attendees in
understanding the project and the
alternatives. A comment table, supplied
with comment sheets, will be placed in
an easily accessible and comfortable
location. Fact sheets about the project
and alternatives will be available to
participants.
DATES: Dates and Addresses: The public
scoping meetings will be held from 5:30
p.m. to 8:30 p.m. on the following dates
and locations:
1. June 23, 2009 at the Poulsbo Fire
Station Main Headquarters,
Multipurpose Room, 911 NE. Liberty
Road, Poulsbo, WA;
2. June 24, 2009 at the Port Ludlow
Fire Station 31, Training Room, 7650
Oak Bay Road, Port Ludlow, WA;
3. June 25, 2009 at the John Stanford
Center for Educational Excellence,
Auditorium, 2445 3rd Avenue South,
Seattle WA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Patrick Grzelak, Public Affairs Officer,
Department of the Navy, Strategic
Systems Programs, 2521 South Clark
Street, Suite 1000, Arlington, VA
22202–3930, telephone: 703–601–9008,
e-mail at: nbkehweis@ssp.navy.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the proposed action is to
support current and future TRIDENT
Fleet Ballistic Missile program
requirements at NAVBASE Kitsap
Bangor, WA. The proposed action is to
construct and operate a proposed new
EHW located adjacent to, but separate
from, the existing EHW on Hood Canal
to support TRIDENT submarines. A new
EHW is needed to ensure the Navy has
the facilities required to offload/load
missiles and perform routine operations
and upgrades necessary to maintain the
TRIDENT program.
As part of the U.S. Navy’s sea-based
strategic deterrence mission, the
TRIDENT submarines play a critical role
of great strategic importance for the U.S.
The Navy has only two Strategic
Weapons Facilities for TRIDENT
submarines. One in the Atlantic located
in Kings Bay, Georgia and one in the
Pacific located in Bangor, Washington.
The Bangor facility has over time been
upgraded, converted, and expanded, to
handle variations in missile systems.
Today’s modern missile is a much more
complex system, and takes more than
twice the time to maintain and handle
thus requiring additional Explosive
Handling Wharf facilities to meet the
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 93 / Friday, May 15, 2009 / Notices
current mission. The new EHW is
needed to maintain operational
availability of the TRIDENT Program in
the Pacific. The purpose of the proposed
action is to meet current and future
technical program requirements for the
TRIDENT mission.
Alternatives for the proposed action
were identified based on capability for
meeting TRIDENT Program mission
requirements, ability to avoid or
minimize environmental impacts, siting
requirements including proximity to
existing infrastructure, availability of
waterfront property, constructability of
essential project features, and
explosives safety restrictions.
Alternatives currently under
consideration include: (1) Deep-Water
Trestle EHW; (2) Onshore Trestle EHW;
(3) No Action Alternative. For both
action alternatives, the EHW would be
located in deep water, parallel to and
600 feet from the shore, and placement
of structures over the intertidal zone
would be minimized. The new EHW
would include a covered operations area
approximately 600 feet long and 250
feet wide, supplemented by an
uncovered wharf extension
approximately 700 feet long and 35 feet
wide.
The wharf would either be an
anchored floating structure or a
structure supported by piles. Separate
pile-supported entrance and exit
trestles, or bridges, would provide a
roadway for missile transport vehicles
to travel from shore to the EHW and
back to shore. For both action
alternatives, the entrance trestle would
be constructed from the end of the
existing EHW access road to connect to
the north end of the new EHW. The two
action alternatives differ in the location
of the exit trestle, which would connect
the south end of the new EHW to the
existing EHW access road.
Under the Deep-Water Trestle
alternative, parallel entry and exit
trestles would be constructed to
transport ordnance to and from the
wharf. The exit trestle would be
constructed over deep water to the
extent possible, crossing the intertidal
zone and returning to land at the
existing EHW access road. The DeepWater Trestle alternative would require
approximately 900 feet of additional inwater construction but would avoid
construction of a road on the steep
embankment adjacent to the proposed
EHW site.
For the Onshore Trestle alternative,
the exit trestle would be constructed to
take the shortest distance to shore from
the south end of the new EHW. This
alternative would require extension of
the exit trestle approximately 1,400 feet
VerDate Nov<24>2008
16:43 May 14, 2009
Jkt 217001
22901
along the edge of the steep embankment
on the shore, away from the intertidal
zone, to connect to the existing access
road.
No decision will be made to
implement any alternative until the EIS
process is complete, with the release of
the Record of Decision. Phased
construction of the project would be
completed in four years.
The impacts to be evaluated include,
but will not be limited to, impacts on
fish and marine mammals, essential fish
habitat, effects on endangered and
threatened species, impacts relating to
underwater sound and underwater
habitat, impacts to the migratory and
transient movement of fish along the
shore, impacts on cultural resources,
reduction in water quality, impacts on
wetlands, terrestrial impacts, effects on
Tribal resources, and human health and
public safety.
The analysis will include an
evaluation of direct, indirect, short term,
and long term impacts from the
construction and operation of the new
EHW and will account for cumulative
impacts from other Navy and non-Navy
activities in the project area.
The Navy is initiating the scoping
process to identify community concerns
and local issues to be addressed in the
EIS. Federal agencies, State agencies,
local agencies, and interested persons
are encouraged to provide written
comments in addition to, or in lieu of,
oral comments at scheduled public
scoping meetings.
Written comments must be
postmarked by midnight July 17, 2009
and should be submitted to: Mr. Patrick
Grzelak, Public Affairs Officer,
Department of the Navy, Strategic
Systems Programs, 2521 South Clark
Street, Suite 1000, Arlington, VA
22202–3930, telephone: 703–601–9008,
e-mail: nbkehweis@ssp.navy.mil.
SUMMARY: The Department of Air Force
is deleting a system of records notice
from its inventory of record systems
subject to the Privacy Act of 1974 (5
U.S.C. 552a), as amended.
DATES: The proposed action will be
effective on June 15, 2009 unless
comments are received that would
result in a contrary determination.
ADDRESSES: Send comments to the Air
Force Privacy Act Officer, Office of
Warfighting Integration and Chief
Information Officer, SAF/XCISI, 1800
Air Force Pentagon, Suite 220,
Washington, DC 20330–1800.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
Ben Swilley, 703–696–6172.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of the Air Force system of
records notices subject to the Privacy
Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as
amended, have been published in the
Federal Register and are available from
the address above.
The Department of the Air Force
proposes to delete a system of records
notice from its inventory of record
systems subject to the Privacy Act of
1974 (5 U.S.C. 552a), as amended. The
proposed deletion is not within the
purview of subsection (r) of the Privacy
Act of 1974, (5 U.S.C. 552a), as
amended, which requires the
submission of a new or altered system
report.
Dated: May 11, 2009.
T.M. Cruz,
Lieutenant Commander, Alternate Federal
Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–11004 Filed 5–14–09; 8:45 am]
REASON:
BILLING CODE 3810–FF–P
Dated: May 12, 2009.
Morgan E. Frazier,
Alternate OSD Federal Register Liaison
Officer, Department of Defense.
F036 AETC T
DELETION:
SYSTEM NAME:
Flying Training Records—Nonstudent
(June 11, 1997, 62 FR 31793).
The records contained in this system
of records are no longer required.
Accordingly, this Privacy Act System of
Records Notice will be deleted from the
Air Force’s inventory.
[FR Doc. E9–11347 Filed 5–14–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 5001–06–P
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of the Air Force
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
[Docket ID: USAF–2009–0031]
Office of the Secretary
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records
AGENCY:
Department of the Air Force,
DoD.
ACTION: Notice to delete a system of
records.
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Docket ID: DOD–2009–OS–0066]
Privacy Act of 1974; System of
Records
AGENCY: Defense Information Systems
Agency, DoD.
E:\FR\FM\15MYN1.SGM
15MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 93 (Friday, May 15, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22900-22901]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11004]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Department of Navy
Notice of Intent To Prepare an Environmental Impact Statement for
TRIDENT Support Facilities Explosives Handling Wharf, Naval Base
Kitsap-Bangor, Silverdale, Kitsap County, WA and To Announce Public
Scoping Meeting
AGENCY: Department of Navy, DoD.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 102 of the National Environmental Policy
Act of 1969, and the regulations implemented by the Council on
Environmental Quality (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), the Department of Navy
(Navy) announces its intent to prepare an Environmental Impact
Statement (EIS) to evaluate the potential environmental impacts
associated with the construction and operation of a proposed new
Explosives Handling Wharf (EHW) located adjacent to, but separate from,
the existing EHW on Hood Canal, NBK-Bangor, WA, to support TRIDENT
submarines.
The proposed action consists of in-water and land-based
construction including a covered ordnance operations area, a support
building on the wharf, and a warping wharf. A warping wharf is a long
narrow wharf extension used to position submarines prior to moving into
the operations area of the EHW.
As part of the U.S. Navy's sea-based strategic deterrence mission,
the Navy Strategic Systems Programs (SSP) directs research,
development, manufacturing, test, evaluation, and operational support
of the TRIDENT Fleet Ballistic Missile program. SSP is the Action
Proponent and the Navy is the lead agency for this project.
On June 10, 2008, the Navy provided notice in the Federal Register
(73 FR 32682) of its intent to prepare an EIS for a TRIDENT Support
Facilities EHW and to announce a public scoping meeting. On June 30,
2008, the Navy provided notice in the Federal Register (73 FR 36847) of
its decision to cancel the June 10, 2008 Notice of Intent. The Notice
of Intent was cancelled to allow the Navy the opportunity to review and
validate the need for the project and identify other alternative
solutions to the proposed construction. After a thorough review, the
Navy has now revalidated the requirement for a second EHW at NAVBASE
Kitsap Bangor.
The Navy will hold three public scoping meetings for the purpose of
further identifying the scope of issues to be addressed in the EIS.
Federal, State, and local agencies and the public are invited to
participate in the scoping process for the EIS. Comments are being
solicited to help identify significant issues or concerns related to
the proposed action, determine the scope of issues to be addressed in
the EIS, and identify and refine alternatives to the proposed action.
The Navy will conduct public scoping meetings to receive oral and/
or written comments on environmental concerns that should be addressed
in the EIS. The public scoping meetings will be conducted in English
and will be arranged in an informal, open house format. Attendees will
be asked to sign in and will be directed to various stations manned by
Navy representatives and technical staff who will provide information
and answer questions. Several large display boards will be located
throughout the meeting locations to assist attendees in understanding
the project and the alternatives. A comment table, supplied with
comment sheets, will be placed in an easily accessible and comfortable
location. Fact sheets about the project and alternatives will be
available to participants.
DATES: Dates and Addresses: The public scoping meetings will be held
from 5:30 p.m. to 8:30 p.m. on the following dates and locations:
1. June 23, 2009 at the Poulsbo Fire Station Main Headquarters,
Multipurpose Room, 911 NE. Liberty Road, Poulsbo, WA;
2. June 24, 2009 at the Port Ludlow Fire Station 31, Training Room,
7650 Oak Bay Road, Port Ludlow, WA;
3. June 25, 2009 at the John Stanford Center for Educational
Excellence, Auditorium, 2445 3rd Avenue South, Seattle WA.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Patrick Grzelak, Public Affairs
Officer, Department of the Navy, Strategic Systems Programs, 2521 South
Clark Street, Suite 1000, Arlington, VA 22202-3930, telephone: 703-601-
9008, e-mail at: nbkehweis@ssp.navy.mil.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the proposed action is to
support current and future TRIDENT Fleet Ballistic Missile program
requirements at NAVBASE Kitsap Bangor, WA. The proposed action is to
construct and operate a proposed new EHW located adjacent to, but
separate from, the existing EHW on Hood Canal to support TRIDENT
submarines. A new EHW is needed to ensure the Navy has the facilities
required to offload/load missiles and perform routine operations and
upgrades necessary to maintain the TRIDENT program.
As part of the U.S. Navy's sea-based strategic deterrence mission,
the TRIDENT submarines play a critical role of great strategic
importance for the U.S. The Navy has only two Strategic Weapons
Facilities for TRIDENT submarines. One in the Atlantic located in Kings
Bay, Georgia and one in the Pacific located in Bangor, Washington. The
Bangor facility has over time been upgraded, converted, and expanded,
to handle variations in missile systems. Today's modern missile is a
much more complex system, and takes more than twice the time to
maintain and handle thus requiring additional Explosive Handling Wharf
facilities to meet the
[[Page 22901]]
current mission. The new EHW is needed to maintain operational
availability of the TRIDENT Program in the Pacific. The purpose of the
proposed action is to meet current and future technical program
requirements for the TRIDENT mission.
Alternatives for the proposed action were identified based on
capability for meeting TRIDENT Program mission requirements, ability to
avoid or minimize environmental impacts, siting requirements including
proximity to existing infrastructure, availability of waterfront
property, constructability of essential project features, and
explosives safety restrictions.
Alternatives currently under consideration include: (1) Deep-Water
Trestle EHW; (2) Onshore Trestle EHW; (3) No Action Alternative. For
both action alternatives, the EHW would be located in deep water,
parallel to and 600 feet from the shore, and placement of structures
over the intertidal zone would be minimized. The new EHW would include
a covered operations area approximately 600 feet long and 250 feet
wide, supplemented by an uncovered wharf extension approximately 700
feet long and 35 feet wide.
The wharf would either be an anchored floating structure or a
structure supported by piles. Separate pile-supported entrance and exit
trestles, or bridges, would provide a roadway for missile transport
vehicles to travel from shore to the EHW and back to shore. For both
action alternatives, the entrance trestle would be constructed from the
end of the existing EHW access road to connect to the north end of the
new EHW. The two action alternatives differ in the location of the exit
trestle, which would connect the south end of the new EHW to the
existing EHW access road.
Under the Deep-Water Trestle alternative, parallel entry and exit
trestles would be constructed to transport ordnance to and from the
wharf. The exit trestle would be constructed over deep water to the
extent possible, crossing the intertidal zone and returning to land at
the existing EHW access road. The Deep-Water Trestle alternative would
require approximately 900 feet of additional in-water construction but
would avoid construction of a road on the steep embankment adjacent to
the proposed EHW site.
For the Onshore Trestle alternative, the exit trestle would be
constructed to take the shortest distance to shore from the south end
of the new EHW. This alternative would require extension of the exit
trestle approximately 1,400 feet along the edge of the steep embankment
on the shore, away from the intertidal zone, to connect to the existing
access road.
No decision will be made to implement any alternative until the EIS
process is complete, with the release of the Record of Decision. Phased
construction of the project would be completed in four years.
The impacts to be evaluated include, but will not be limited to,
impacts on fish and marine mammals, essential fish habitat, effects on
endangered and threatened species, impacts relating to underwater sound
and underwater habitat, impacts to the migratory and transient movement
of fish along the shore, impacts on cultural resources, reduction in
water quality, impacts on wetlands, terrestrial impacts, effects on
Tribal resources, and human health and public safety.
The analysis will include an evaluation of direct, indirect, short
term, and long term impacts from the construction and operation of the
new EHW and will account for cumulative impacts from other Navy and
non-Navy activities in the project area.
The Navy is initiating the scoping process to identify community
concerns and local issues to be addressed in the EIS. Federal agencies,
State agencies, local agencies, and interested persons are encouraged
to provide written comments in addition to, or in lieu of, oral
comments at scheduled public scoping meetings.
Written comments must be postmarked by midnight July 17, 2009 and
should be submitted to: Mr. Patrick Grzelak, Public Affairs Officer,
Department of the Navy, Strategic Systems Programs, 2521 South Clark
Street, Suite 1000, Arlington, VA 22202-3930, telephone: 703-601-9008,
e-mail: nbkehweis@ssp.navy.mil.
Dated: May 11, 2009.
T.M. Cruz,
Lieutenant Commander, Alternate Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. E9-11004 Filed 5-14-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P