Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Submitted Early Progress Plan for Clark County 8-hour Ozone for Transportation Conformity Purposes; Nevada, 22738-22739 [E9-11278]
Download as PDF
22738
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 92 / Thursday, May 14, 2009 / Notices
b. all other Western power and
transmission facilities.
4. Ensures that project beneficiaries
repay project costs.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
III. Project Funding
A. Applicability: All projects selected
for funding under this authority will be
governed by the principles, policies,
and practices outlined in this notice.
B. Policies and Practices:
1. Western will use generally accepted
accounting principles and practices in
recording and tracking all expenses and
revenue transactions for each project
selected.
2. Western will isolate these financial
accounting transactions in its existing
financial management system.
3. Western will look for public-private
partnerships to maximize the leveraging
of funds.
IV. Project Evaluation
A. Applicability: All projects to be
considered for funding under this
authority will be evaluated against the
minimum criteria outlined below.
B. Criteria: Project evaluation
includes feasibility of developing a
project that meets the following
minimum criteria:
1. Facilitates the delivery to market of
power generated by renewable resources
constructed or reasonably expected to
be constructed;
2. is in the public interest;
3. will not adversely impact system
reliability or operations, or other
statutory obligations;
4. establishes the reasonable
expectation that the project will
generate enough transmission service
revenue to repay the principal
investment; all operating costs,
including overhead; and the accrued
interest by the end of the project’s
service life;
5. has at least one terminus located
within Western’s service territory;
6. describes the economic
developmental benefits of the project,
including an estimate of how many and
the type, how fast, and where in the
country jobs are created;
7. gives priority to projects that satisfy
Western’s Open Access Transmission
Tariff or related requests;
8. addresses the technical merits and
feasibility of a project;
9. demonstrates the financial stability
and capability of all potential project
partners;
10. describes project readiness (e.g.,
permitting, local, state and/or regional
approval); and
11. describes all project partners’
participation in a region-wide
interconnection-wide planning group or
forum.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:37 May 13, 2009
Jkt 217001
C. Policies and Practices:
1. Western will establish additional
criteria to evaluate proposed projects as
necessary.
2. Western may, at its discretion, use
outside expertise to assist in evaluating
proposed projects seeking funding
under this authority. Western will use
its current acquisition practices to retain
any contractors to assist in project
evaluation and will use the specific
regulations in the FAR to address any
organizational conflicts of interest.
3. Western will treat data submitted
by project participants related to this
authority, including project
descriptions, participation and
financing arrangements by other parties,
as available to the public through the
FOIA. However, participants may
request confidential treatment of all or
part of a submitted document under
FOIA’s exemption for ‘‘Confidential
Business Information.’’ Materials so
designated and which meet the criteria
stipulated in the FOIA will be treated as
exempt from FOIA inquiries.
V. Project Development and Operations
and Maintenance
A. Applicability: All projects funded
under this authority.
B. Policies and Practices:
1. For study, facility development,
construction and any other related
purposes, where applicable, Western
will consider projects that are
constructed pursuant to its authority
under section 402 of the Recovery Act
separately from procedures and
requirements for arranging for
transmission service or interconnection
under its OATT, or related
interconnection agreements. Western
will use the appropriate project
management methods to initiate, plan,
execute, monitor, control and close all
transmission projects approved for
funding under this authority.
2. Available transfer capability
surplus to Western’s need will be made
available in a nondiscriminatory
manner consistent with FERC open
access transmission rules, Federal
statute, and Western policies.
3. Western will comply with all other
applicable Federal laws, regulations and
policies, including the National
Environmental Policy Act, the FAR, and
other applicable provisions of the
Recovery Act.
VI. Project Rates and Repayment
A. Applicability: All projects funded
under this authority.
B. Criteria: The repayment
requirements and applicable
transmission rates will be designed so
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
that proceeds from the project meet the
repayment obligation.
C. Policies and Practices:
1. Before project development,
Western will confirm the reasonable
likelihood that the project will generate
enough transmission service revenue to
meet Western’s financial repayment
obligations including principal
investment, operating costs including
overhead, accrued interest, and other
appropriate costs.
2. Transmission rates for transmission
capacity Western controls will be
developed in a public process following
the applicable requirements outlined in
10 CFR part 903 and RA6120.2, and set
by the Administrator as specified in
relevant DOE orders.
Environmental Compliance
In compliance with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321, et seq.), the
Council on Environmental Quality
Regulations for implementing NEPA (40
CFR parts 1500–1508) and the DOE
NEPA Implementing Procedures and
Guidelines (10 CFR part 1021).
Western has determined that this
action is categorically excluded from
further NEPA analysis. Future actions
under this authority will undergo
appropriate NEPA analysis.
Dated: April 21, 2009.
Timothy J. Meeks,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. E9–11299 Filed 5–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–R09–OAR–2008–0728; FRL–8905–2]
Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle
Emissions Budgets in Submitted Early
Progress Plan for Clark County 8-hour
Ozone for Transportation Conformity
Purposes; Nevada
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Adequacy.
SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is
notifying the public that the Agency has
found that the motor vehicle emissions
budgets for 8-hour ozone in the 8-hour
Ozone Early Progress Plan for Clark
County, Nevada (June 2008) (‘‘Clark
County Ozone EPP’’) are adequate for
transportation conformity purposes. The
Clark County Ozone EPP was submitted
to EPA on July 28, 2008 by the Nevada
Division of Environmental Protection
(NDEP) as a revision to the Nevada State
Implementation Plan (SIP). As a result
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 92 / Thursday, May 14, 2009 / Notices
of our adequacy findings, the Southern
Nevada Regional Transportation
Commission (RTC) and the U.S.
Department of Transportation must use
these budgets in future transportation
conformity analyses once the finding
becomes effective.
DATES: This finding is effective May 29,
2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Karina O’Connor, U.S. EPA, Region IX,
Air Division AIR–2, 75 Hawthorne
Street, San Francisco, CA 94105–3901;
(775) 833–1276 or
oconnor.karina@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, whenever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
EPA.
Today’s notice is simply an
announcement of a finding that we have
already made. EPA Region IX sent a
letter to NDEP on May 5, 2009 stating
that the motor vehicle emissions
budgets in the submitted Clark County
Ozone EPP for the year 2008 are
adequate. Receipt of the motor vehicle
emissions budgets in the Clark County
Ozone EPP was announced on EPA’s
transportation conformity Web site on
August 19, 2008. We received no
comments in response to the adequacy
review posting. The finding is available
at EPA’s conformity Web site: https://
www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/
transconf/adequacy.htm.
The adequate motor vehicle emissions
budgets are provided in the following
table:
Motor vehicle emissions budgets (Ozone
season)
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 5, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E9–11278 Filed 5–13–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
[EPA–HQ–OPP–2008–0156; FRL–8905–1]
Agency Information Collection
Activities; Submission to OMB for
Review and Approval; Comment
Request; Use of Consumer Research
in Developing Improved Labeling for
Pesticide Products, EPA ICR No.
2297.01, OMB Control No. 2070–NEW
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3501 et seq.), this document announces
Budget year
that an Information Collection Request
(ICR) has been forwarded to the Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) for
2008 ..................
64.2
76.1 review and approval. This is a request
for a new collection. This ICR describes
Transportation conformity is required the nature of the information collection
by Clean Air Act section 176(c). EPA’s
and its estimated burden and cost.
conformity rule requires that
DATES: Additional comments may be
transportation plans, transportation
submitted on or before June 15, 2009.
improvement programs, and projects
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
conform to state air quality
referencing docket ID number EPA–HQ–
implementation plans (SIPs) and
OPP–2008–0156, to (1) EPA Online to
establishes the criteria and procedures
for determining whether or not they do. https://www.regulations.gov (our
preferred method), or by mail to: Office
Conformity to an SIP means that
of Pesticide Programs (OPP) Regulatory
transportation activities will not
Public Docket (7502P), 1200
produce new air quality violations,
Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington,
worsen existing violations, or delay
DC 20460, and (2) OMB at: Office of
timely attainment of the national
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
ambient air quality standards.
The criteria by which we determine
Office of Management and Budget
whether an SIP’s motor vehicle
(OMB), Attention: Desk Officer for EPA,
emission budgets are adequate for
725 17th Street, NW., Washington, DC
conformity purposes are outlined in 40
20503.
Volatile
organic
compounds
(tons per
day)
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
CFR 93.118(e)(4) which was
promulgated in our August 15, 1997
final rule (62 FR 43780, 43781–43783).
We have described our process for
determining the adequacy of submitted
SIP budgets in our July 1, 2004
preamble starting at 69 FR 40038 and
we used the information in these
resources in making our adequacy
determination. Please note that an
adequacy review is separate from EPA’s
completeness review, and should not be
used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate
approval action for the SIP. Even if we
find a budget adequate, the SIP could
later be disapproved.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:37 May 13, 2009
Nitrogen
oxides
(tons per
day)
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
22739
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cameo Smoot, Field and External
Affairs Division, 7506P, Office of
Pesticide Programs, Environmental
Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania
Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460;
telephone number: (703) 305–5454; fax
number: (703) 305–5884; e-mail address:
smoot.cameo@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: EPA has
submitted the following ICR to OMB for
review and approval according to the
procedures prescribed in 5 CFR 1320.12.
On April 2, 2008 (73 FR 17971), EPA
sought comments on this ICR pursuant
to 5 CFR 1320.8(d). EPA received one
comment and has addressed the
comment received.
EPA has established a public docket
for this ICR under Docket ID No. EPA–
HQ–OPP–2008–0156, which is available
for Online viewing at https://
www.regulations.gov, or in person
viewing at the OPP Regulatory Public
Docket in Rm. S–4400, One Potomac
Yard (South Building), 2777 S. Crystal
Drive, Arlington, VA. The hours of
operation of this Docket Facility are
from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday
through Friday, excluding legal
holidays. The Docket telephone number
is (703) 305–5805.
Use EPA’s electronic docket and
comment system at https://
www.regulations.gov, to submit or view
public comments, access the index
listing of the contents of the docket, and
to access those documents in the docket
that are available electronically. Once in
the system, select ‘‘docket search,’’ then
key in the docket ID number identified
above. Please note that EPA’s policy is
that public comments, whether
submitted electronically or in paper,
will be made available for public
viewing at https://www.regulations.gov
as EPA receives them and without
change, unless the comment contains
copyrighted material, Confidential
Business Information (CBI), or other
information whose public disclosure is
restricted by statute. For further
information about the electronic docket,
go to https://www.regulations.gov.
Title: Use of Consumer Research in
Developing Improved Labeling for
Pesticide Products.
ICR Numbers: EPA ICR No. 2297.01,
OMB Control No. 2070–New.
ICR Status: This ICR is for a new
information collection activity. An
Agency may not conduct or sponsor,
and a person is not required to respond
to, a collection of information, unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number. The OMB control numbers for
EPA’s regulations in title 40 of the CFR,
after appearing in the Federal Register
E:\FR\FM\14MYN1.SGM
14MYN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 92 (Thursday, May 14, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22738-22739]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11278]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
[EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0728; FRL-8905-2]
Adequacy Status of Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets in Submitted
Early Progress Plan for Clark County 8-hour Ozone for Transportation
Conformity Purposes; Nevada
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Notice of Adequacy.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is notifying the public that the Agency
has found that the motor vehicle emissions budgets for 8-hour ozone in
the 8-hour Ozone Early Progress Plan for Clark County, Nevada (June
2008) (``Clark County Ozone EPP'') are adequate for transportation
conformity purposes. The Clark County Ozone EPP was submitted to EPA on
July 28, 2008 by the Nevada Division of Environmental Protection (NDEP)
as a revision to the Nevada State Implementation Plan (SIP). As a
result
[[Page 22739]]
of our adequacy findings, the Southern Nevada Regional Transportation
Commission (RTC) and the U.S. Department of Transportation must use
these budgets in future transportation conformity analyses once the
finding becomes effective.
DATES: This finding is effective May 29, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Karina O'Connor, U.S. EPA, Region IX,
Air Division AIR-2, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA 94105-3901;
(775) 833-1276 or oconnor.karina@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, whenever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean EPA.
Today's notice is simply an announcement of a finding that we have
already made. EPA Region IX sent a letter to NDEP on May 5, 2009
stating that the motor vehicle emissions budgets in the submitted Clark
County Ozone EPP for the year 2008 are adequate. Receipt of the motor
vehicle emissions budgets in the Clark County Ozone EPP was announced
on EPA's transportation conformity Web site on August 19, 2008. We
received no comments in response to the adequacy review posting. The
finding is available at EPA's conformity Web site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm.
The adequate motor vehicle emissions budgets are provided in the
following table:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Motor vehicle emissions budgets (Ozone season)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Volatile
organic Nitrogen
Budget year compounds oxides
(tons per (tons per
day) day)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
2008.......................................... 64.2 76.1
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Transportation conformity is required by Clean Air Act section
176(c). EPA's conformity rule requires that transportation plans,
transportation improvement programs, and projects conform to state air
quality implementation plans (SIPs) and establishes the criteria and
procedures for determining whether or not they do. Conformity to an SIP
means that transportation activities will not produce new air quality
violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of
the national ambient air quality standards.
The criteria by which we determine whether an SIP's motor vehicle
emission budgets are adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in
40 CFR 93.118(e)(4) which was promulgated in our August 15, 1997 final
rule (62 FR 43780, 43781-43783). We have described our process for
determining the adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in our July 1, 2004
preamble starting at 69 FR 40038 and we used the information in these
resources in making our adequacy determination. Please note that an
adequacy review is separate from EPA's completeness review, and should
not be used to prejudge EPA's ultimate approval action for the SIP.
Even if we find a budget adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved.
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Dated: May 5, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
[FR Doc. E9-11278 Filed 5-13-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P