WTO Agricultural Safeguard Trigger Levels, 22512-22514 [E9-11108]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
22512
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 13, 2009 / Notices
facilities at the mine include a locked
explosives storage shed, lighting,
ventilation fans, one or more stormwater
ponds, and a field office. The proposed
Federal action is to approve Laramide
Resources (USA), Inc.’s Plan of
Operations with mitigations needed to
protect other non-mineral surface
resources consistent with Forest Plan,
regulations, and other applicable laws.
Possible Alternatives
1. No Action. 2. Approve the Plan as
presented. 3. Approve the Plan as
presented by Laramide Resources
(USA), Inc., with stipulations necessary
to protect the non-mineral resources of
the area.
Responsible Official
Nancy Rose, Forest Supervisor, Cibola
National Forest. 2113 Osuna Road, NE.,
Albuquerque, NM 87113.
Nature of Decision To Be Made
The Forest Supervisor will use the EIS
process to develop the necessary
information to make an informed
decision on whether or not to approve
the proposed Plan as submitted, or to
decide what additional mitigations are
needed to protect other resources as
provided for in 36 CFR 228.8.
Scoping Process
Scoping will include this NOI, listing
in the Quarterly Schedule of Proposed
Actions, letters to interested and
affected individuals, agencies, and
organizations, and legal notices, and the
open houses in Grants and Gallup, New
Mexico. Additional information about
the project, schedule, permits and
approvals, and opportunities for public
involvement will be available at the
open houses. The intent of scoping is to
solicit comments on issues and
alternatives that agencies and the public
feel should be addressed in the EIS.
Authority: 40 CFR 1501.7 and 1508.22; 36
CFR 220.4.
Dated: April 30, 2009.
Nancy Rose,
Forest Supervisor, Cibola National Forest.
[FR Doc. E9–11223 Filed 5–12–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Notice of Southwest Idaho Resource
Advisory Committee Meeting
ACTION:
One preliminary issue has been
identified: the development of the La
Jara Mesa Mine may affect the
characteristics that make the Mount
Taylor Traditional Cultural Property
eligible for the National Register of
Historic Places. Other issues may
include groundwater contamination,
natural resources, economics and health
and safety issues.
Permits or Licenses Required
The approved Plan of Operations
authorizes mining. Operations must be
consistent with Forest Service
Conditions of Approval, and other
applicable laws and regulations,
18:44 May 12, 2009
Comment Requested
This notice of intent initiates the
scoping process which guides the
development of the environmental
impact statement. Comments are
solicited and are welcome for the 30-day
comment period initiating on the
publication date of this notice.
It is important that reviewers provide
their comments at such times and in
such a way that they are useful to the
Agency’s preparation of the EIS.
Therefore, comments should be
provided prior to the close of the
comment period and should clearly
articulate the reviewer’s concerns and
contentions. The submission of timely
and specific comments can affect a
reviewer’s ability to participate in
subsequent administrative review or
judicial review. Comments received in
response to this solicitation, including
names and addresses of those who
comment, will be part of the public
record for this proposed action.
Comments submitted anonymously will
be accepted and considered; however,
anonymous comments will not provide
the respondent with standing to
participate in subsequent administrative
review or judicial review.
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
Preliminary Issues
VerDate Nov<24>2008
including state permits for mining in
New Mexico.
Jkt 217001
SUMMARY: Pursuant to the authorities in
the Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. 92–463) and under the Secure
Rural Schools and Community SelfDetermination Act of 2000, as amended,
(Pub. L. 110–343), the Boise and Payette
National Forests’ Southwest Idaho
Resource Advisory Committee will
conduct a business meeting. The
meeting is open to the public.
DATES: Wednesday, May 20, 2009
beginning at 10:30 a.m.
ADDRESSES: Council Ranger District,
2092 Highway 95, Council, Idaho 83612.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Agenda
topics will include review and approval
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
of project proposals, and is an open
public forum.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Kimberly Brandel, Designated Federal
Official, at (208) 347–0301 or e-mail
kbrandel@fs.fed.us.
Dated: April 22, 2009.
Suzanne C. Rainville,
Forest Supervisor, Payette National Forest.
[FR Doc. E9–11125 Filed 5–12–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Foreign Agricultural Service
WTO Agricultural Safeguard Trigger
Levels
AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service,
USDA.
ACTION: Notice of product coverage and
trigger levels for safeguard measures
provided for in the World Trade
Organization (WTO) Agreement on
Agriculture.
SUMMARY: This notice lists the updated
quantity trigger levels for products
which may be subject to additional
import duties under the safeguard
provisions of the WTO Agreement on
Agriculture. This notice also includes
the relevant period applicable for the
trigger levels on each of the listed
products.
DATES: Effective Date: May 13, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lana Bennett, Import Policies and
Export Reporting Division, Foreign
Agricultural Service, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Stop 1021, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250–1021, telephone
at (202) 720–0638, or e-mail
itspd@fas.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Article 5
of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture
provides that additional import duties
may be imposed on imports of products
subject to tariffication as a result of the
Uruguay Round, if certain conditions
are met. The agreement permits
additional duties to be charged if the
price of an individual shipment of
imported products falls below the
average price for similar goods imported
during the years 1986–88 by a specified
percentage. It also permits additional
duties to be imposed if the volume of
imports of an article exceeds the average
of the most recent 3 years for which data
are available by 5, 10, or 25 percent,
depending on the article. These
additional duties may not be imposed
on quantities for which minimum or
current access commitments were made
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
22513
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 13, 2009 / Notices
during the Uruguay Round negotiations,
and only one type of safeguard, price or
quantity may be applied at any given
time to an article.
Section 405 of the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act requires that the
President cause to be published in the
Federal Register information regarding
the price and quantity safeguards,
including the quantity trigger levels,
which must be updated annually based
upon import levels during the most
recent 3 years. The President delegated
this duty to the Secretary of Agriculture
in Presidential Proclamation No. 6763,
dated December 23, 1994, 60 FR 1005
(Jan. 4, 1995). The Secretary of
Agriculture further delegated the duty to
the Administrator of the Foreign
Agricultural Service (7 CFR 2.43 (a)(2)
(2007)). The Annex to this notice
contains the updated quantity trigger
levels.
Additional information on the
products subject to safeguards and the
additional duties which may apply can
be found in subchapter IV of Chapter 99
of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of
the United States (2007) and in the
Secretary of Agriculture’s Notice of
Uruguay Round Agricultural Safeguard
Trigger Levels, published in the Federal
Register at 60 FR 427 (Jan. 4, 1995).
Notice: As provided in section 405 of
the Uruguay Round Agreements Act,
consistent with Article 5 of the
Agreement on Agriculture, the safeguard
quantity trigger levels previously
notified are superceded by the levels
indicated in the Annex to this notice.
The definitions of these products were
provided in the Notice of Uruguay
Round Agricultural Safeguard Trigger
Levels, published in the Federal
Register, at 60 FR 427 (Jan. 4, 1995).
Issued at Washington, DC, this 29th day of
April 2009.
Patricial R. Sheikh,
Acting Administrator, Foreign Agricultural
Service.
ANNEX
QUANTITY-BASED SAFEGUARD TRIGGER
Product
Trigger level
Period
Beef ..............................................................................
Mutton ...........................................................................
Cream ...........................................................................
Evaporated or Condensed Milk ....................................
Nonfat Dry Milk .............................................................
Dried Whole Milk ..........................................................
Dried Cream .................................................................
Dried Whey/Buttermilk ..................................................
Butter ............................................................................
Butter Oil and Butter Substitutes ..................................
Dairy Mixtures ...............................................................
Blue Cheese .................................................................
Cheddar Cheese ..........................................................
American-Type Cheese ................................................
Edam/Gouda Cheese ...................................................
Italian-Type Cheese .....................................................
Swiss Cheese with Eye Formation ..............................
Gruyere Process Cheese .............................................
Lowfat Cheese ..............................................................
NSPF Cheese ...............................................................
Peanuts .........................................................................
317,662 mt ..............................................
6,808 mt ..................................................
1,125,550 liters .......................................
5,234,255 kilograms ...............................
219,775 kilograms ..................................
2,239,115 kilograms ...............................
29,393 kilograms ....................................
19,998 kilograms ....................................
7,514,294 kilograms ...............................
6,541,513 kilograms ...............................
52,092,707 kilograms .............................
5,229,457 kilograms ...............................
12,279,311 kilograms .............................
8,841,320 kilograms ...............................
8,013,001 kilograms ...............................
23,312,030 kilograms .............................
30,506,943 kilograms .............................
5,517,302 kilograms ...............................
956,596 kilograms ..................................
50,252,329 kilograms .............................
12,096 mt ................................................
15,172 mt ................................................
4,183 mt ..................................................
1,462,968 mt ...........................................
1,407,556 mt ...........................................
175,217 mt ..............................................
191,180 mt ..............................................
72 mt .......................................................
107 mt .....................................................
669 mt .....................................................
578 mt .....................................................
16,759 mt ................................................
15,617 mt ................................................
1,329 mt ..................................................
1,249 mt ..................................................
9,296,789 kilograms ...............................
229,577 kilograms ..................................
9,173 kilograms ......................................
243 mt .....................................................
315 mt .....................................................
128 mt .....................................................
176 mt .....................................................
2,810,259 liters .......................................
23,363 kilograms ....................................
669,917 kilograms ..................................
699,482 kilograms ..................................
0 kilograms .............................................
0 kilograms .............................................
1,723,796 kilograms ...............................
688,341 kilograms ..................................
4,416,936 kilograms ...............................
3,656,233 kilograms ...............................
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
April 1, 2008 to March 31, 2009.
April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
September 20, 2008 to September 19, 2009.
September 20, 2009 to September 19, 2010.
August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2009.
August 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010.
August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2009.
August 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010.
August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2009.
August 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010.
Peanut Butter/Paste .....................................................
Raw Cane Sugar ..........................................................
Refined Sugar and Syrups ...........................................
Blended Syrups ............................................................
Articles Over 65% Sugar ..............................................
Articles Over 10% Sugar ..............................................
Sweetened Cocoa Powder ...........................................
Chocolate Crumb ..........................................................
Lowfat Chocolate Crumb ..............................................
Infant Formula Containing Oligosaccharides ...............
Mixes and Doughs ........................................................
Mixed Condiments and Seasonings .............................
Ice Cream .....................................................................
Animal Feed Containing Milk .......................................
Short Staple Cotton ......................................................
Harsh or Rough Cotton ................................................
Medium Staple Cotton ..................................................
Extra Long Staple Cotton .............................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:44 May 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
22514
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 91 / Wednesday, May 13, 2009 / Notices
QUANTITY-BASED SAFEGUARD TRIGGER—Continued
Product
Trigger level
Cotton Waste ................................................................
70,768 kilograms ....................................
395,745 kilograms ..................................
10,205 kilograms ....................................
3,995 kilograms ......................................
Cotton, Processed, Not Spun .......................................
[FR Doc. E9–11108 Filed 5–12–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–10–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
(A–201–830)
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping
Duty Changed Circumstances Review:
Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire
Rod from Mexico
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: The Department of Commerce
(the Department) has determined that
Ternium Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
(Ternium) is the successor–in-interest to
Hylsa S.A. de C.V. (Hylsa) and, as a
result, should be accorded the same
treatment previously accorded to Hylsa
in regard to the antidumping duty order
on carbon and certain alloy steel wire
rod (wire rod) from Mexico as of the
date of publication of this notice in the
Federal Register.
EFFECTIVE DATE: May 13, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jolanta Lawska, AD/CVD Operations,
Office 3, Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th and
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington,
DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–8362.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On September 3, 2008, Ternium
requested that the Department conduct
a changed circumstances review of the
antidumping duty order on wire rod
from Mexico to determine whether
Ternium is the successor–in-interest to
Hylsa. On November 12, 2008, the
Department initiated a changed
circumstances review of the
antidumping duty order on wire rod
from Mexico. See Notice of Initiation of
Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review: Carbon and
Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from
Mexico, 73 FR 66839 (November 12,
2008) (Notice of Initiation). On April 2,
2009, the Department made its
preliminary determination that Ternium
VerDate Nov<24>2008
18:44 May 12, 2009
Jkt 217001
Period
is the successor–in-interest to Hylsa and
should be treated as such for
antidumping duty cash deposit
purposes. See Notice of Preliminary
Results of Antidumping Duty Changed
Circumstances Review: Carbon and
Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from
Mexico, 74 FR 14957 (April 2, 2009)
(Preliminary Results). In the Preliminary
Results, we stated that interested parties
could request a hearing no later than 10
days or submit case briefs to the
Department no later than 14 days after
the publication of the Preliminary
Results in the Federal Register, and
submit rebuttal briefs, limited to the
issues raised in those case briefs, seven
days subsequent to the case briefs due
date. We did not receive any hearing
requests or comments on the
Preliminary Results.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise subject to this order
is certain hot–rolled products of carbon
steel and alloy steel, in coils, of
approximately round cross section, 5.00
mm or more, but less than 19.00 mm. in
solid cross-sectional diameter.
Specifically excluded are steel
products possessing the above–noted
physical characteristics and meeting the
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the
United States (HTSUS) definitions for
(a) stainless steel; (b) tool steel; (c) high
nickel steel; (d) ball bearing steel; (e)
concrete reinforcing bars and rods; and
(f) free machining steel products (i.e.,
products that contain by weight one or
more of the following elements: 0.03
percent or more of lead, 0.05 percent or
more of bismuth, 0.08 percent or more
of sulfur, more than 0.04 percent of
phosphorus, more than 0.05 percent of
selenium, or more than 0.01 percent of
tellurium).
Also excluded from the scope are
1080 grade tire cord quality wire rod
and 1080 grade tire bead quality wire
rod. This grade 1080 tire cord quality
rod is defined as: (i) grade 1080 tire cord
quality wire rod measuring 5.0 mm or
more but not more than 6.0 mm in
cross-sectional diameter; (ii) with an
average partial decarburization of no
more than 70 microns in depth
(maximum individual 200 microns); (iii)
having no non–deformable inclusions
greater than 20 microns and no
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
September
September
September
September
20,
20,
11,
11,
2008
2009
2008
2009
to
to
to
to
September
September
September
September
19,
19,
10,
10,
2009.
2010.
2009.
2010.
deformable inclusions greater than 35
microns; (iv) having a carbon
segregation per heat average of 3.0 or
better using European Method NFA 04–
114; (v) having a surface quality with no
surface defects of a length greater than
0.15 mm; (vi) capable of being drawn to
a diameter of 0.30 mm or less with 3 or
fewer breaks per ton, and (vii)
containing by weight the following
elements in the proportions shown: (1)
0.78 percent or more of carbon, (2) less
than 0.01 percent of aluminum, (3)
0.040 percent or less, in the aggregate,
of phosphorus and sulfur, (4) 0.006
percent or less of nitrogen, and (5) not
more than 0.15 percent, in the aggregate,
of copper, nickel and chromium.
This grade 1080 tire bead quality rod
is defined as: (i) grade 1080 tire bead
quality wire rod measuring 5.5 mm or
more but not more than 7.0 mm in
cross-sectional diameter; (ii) with an
average partial decarburization of no
more than 70 microns in depth
(maximum individual 200 microns); (iii)
having no non–deformable inclusions
greater than 20 microns and no
deformable inclusions greater than 35
microns; (iv) having a carbon
segregation per heat average of 3.0 or
better using European Method NFA 04–
114; (v) having a surface quality with no
surface defects of a length greater than
0.2 mm; (vi) capable of being drawn to
a diameter of 0.78 mm or larger with 0.5
or fewer breaks per ton; and (vii)
containing by weight the following
elements in the proportions shown: (1)
0.78 percent or more of carbon, (2) less
than 0.01 percent of soluble aluminum,
(3) 0.040 percent or less, in the
aggregate, of phosphorus and sulfur, (4)
0.008 percent or less of nitrogen, and (5)
either not more than 0.15 percent, in the
aggregate, of copper, nickel and
chromium (if chromium is not
specified), or not more than 0.10 percent
in the aggregate of copper and nickel
and a chromium content of 0.24 to 0.30
percent (if chromium is specified).
For purposes of the grade 1080 tire
cord quality wire rod and the grade
1080 tire bead quality wire rod, an
inclusion will be considered to be
deformable if its ratio of length
(measured along the axis - that is, the
direction of rolling - of the rod) over
thickness (measured on the same
E:\FR\FM\13MYN1.SGM
13MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 91 (Wednesday, May 13, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 22512-22514]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-11108]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Foreign Agricultural Service
WTO Agricultural Safeguard Trigger Levels
AGENCY: Foreign Agricultural Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of product coverage and trigger levels for safeguard
measures provided for in the World Trade Organization (WTO) Agreement
on Agriculture.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This notice lists the updated quantity trigger levels for
products which may be subject to additional import duties under the
safeguard provisions of the WTO Agreement on Agriculture. This notice
also includes the relevant period applicable for the trigger levels on
each of the listed products.
DATES: Effective Date: May 13, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lana Bennett, Import Policies and
Export Reporting Division, Foreign Agricultural Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Stop 1021, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW.,
Washington, DC 20250-1021, telephone at (202) 720-0638, or e-mail
itspd@fas.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Article 5 of the WTO Agreement on
Agriculture provides that additional import duties may be imposed on
imports of products subject to tariffication as a result of the Uruguay
Round, if certain conditions are met. The agreement permits additional
duties to be charged if the price of an individual shipment of imported
products falls below the average price for similar goods imported
during the years 1986-88 by a specified percentage. It also permits
additional duties to be imposed if the volume of imports of an article
exceeds the average of the most recent 3 years for which data are
available by 5, 10, or 25 percent, depending on the article. These
additional duties may not be imposed on quantities for which minimum or
current access commitments were made
[[Page 22513]]
during the Uruguay Round negotiations, and only one type of safeguard,
price or quantity may be applied at any given time to an article.
Section 405 of the Uruguay Round Agreements Act requires that the
President cause to be published in the Federal Register information
regarding the price and quantity safeguards, including the quantity
trigger levels, which must be updated annually based upon import levels
during the most recent 3 years. The President delegated this duty to
the Secretary of Agriculture in Presidential Proclamation No. 6763,
dated December 23, 1994, 60 FR 1005 (Jan. 4, 1995). The Secretary of
Agriculture further delegated the duty to the Administrator of the
Foreign Agricultural Service (7 CFR 2.43 (a)(2) (2007)). The Annex to
this notice contains the updated quantity trigger levels.
Additional information on the products subject to safeguards and
the additional duties which may apply can be found in subchapter IV of
Chapter 99 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States
(2007) and in the Secretary of Agriculture's Notice of Uruguay Round
Agricultural Safeguard Trigger Levels, published in the Federal
Register at 60 FR 427 (Jan. 4, 1995).
Notice: As provided in section 405 of the Uruguay Round Agreements
Act, consistent with Article 5 of the Agreement on Agriculture, the
safeguard quantity trigger levels previously notified are superceded by
the levels indicated in the Annex to this notice. The definitions of
these products were provided in the Notice of Uruguay Round
Agricultural Safeguard Trigger Levels, published in the Federal
Register, at 60 FR 427 (Jan. 4, 1995).
Issued at Washington, DC, this 29th day of April 2009.
Patricial R. Sheikh,
Acting Administrator, Foreign Agricultural Service.
ANNEX
Quantity-Based Safeguard Trigger
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Product Trigger level Period
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beef............................ 317,662 mt......... January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Mutton.......................... 6,808 mt........... January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Cream........................... 1,125,550 liters... January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Evaporated or Condensed Milk.... 5,234,255 kilograms January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Nonfat Dry Milk................. 219,775 kilograms.. January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Dried Whole Milk................ 2,239,115 kilograms January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Dried Cream..................... 29,393 kilograms... January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Dried Whey/Buttermilk........... 19,998 kilograms... January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Butter.......................... 7,514,294 kilograms January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Butter Oil and Butter 6,541,513 kilograms January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Substitutes.
Dairy Mixtures.................. 52,092,707 January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
kilograms.
Blue Cheese..................... 5,229,457 kilograms January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Cheddar Cheese.................. 12,279,311 January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
kilograms.
American-Type Cheese............ 8,841,320 kilograms January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Edam/Gouda Cheese............... 8,013,001 kilograms January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Italian-Type Cheese............. 23,312,030 January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
kilograms.
Swiss Cheese with Eye Formation. 30,506,943 January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
kilograms.
Gruyere Process Cheese.......... 5,517,302 kilograms January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Lowfat Cheese................... 956,596 kilograms.. January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
NSPF Cheese..................... 50,252,329 January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
kilograms.
Peanuts......................... 12,096 mt.......... April 1, 2008 to March 31, 2009.
15,172 mt.......... April 1, 2009 to March 31, 2010.
Peanut Butter/Paste............. 4,183 mt........... January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Raw Cane Sugar.................. 1,462,968 mt....... October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
1,407,556 mt....... October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
Refined Sugar and Syrups........ 175,217 mt......... October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
191,180 mt......... October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
Blended Syrups.................. 72 mt.............. October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
107 mt............. October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
Articles Over 65% Sugar......... 669 mt............. October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
578 mt............. October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
Articles Over 10% Sugar......... 16,759 mt.......... October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
15,617 mt.......... October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
Sweetened Cocoa Powder.......... 1,329 mt........... October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
1,249 mt........... October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
Chocolate Crumb................. 9,296,789 kilograms January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Lowfat Chocolate Crumb.......... 229,577 kilograms.. January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Infant Formula Containing 9,173 kilograms.... January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Oligosaccharides.
Mixes and Doughs................ 243 mt............. October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
315 mt............. October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
Mixed Condiments and Seasonings. 128 mt............. October 1, 2008 to September 30, 2009.
176 mt............. October 1, 2009 to September 30, 2010.
Ice Cream....................... 2,810,259 liters... January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Animal Feed Containing Milk..... 23,363 kilograms... January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009.
Short Staple Cotton............. 669,917 kilograms.. September 20, 2008 to September 19, 2009.
699,482 kilograms.. September 20, 2009 to September 19, 2010.
Harsh or Rough Cotton........... 0 kilograms........ August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2009.
0 kilograms........ August 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010.
Medium Staple Cotton............ 1,723,796 kilograms August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2009.
688,341 kilograms.. August 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010.
Extra Long Staple Cotton........ 4,416,936 kilograms August 1, 2008 to July 31, 2009.
3,656,233 kilograms August 1, 2009 to July 31, 2010.
[[Page 22514]]
Cotton Waste.................... 70,768 kilograms... September 20, 2008 to September 19, 2009.
395,745 kilograms.. September 20, 2009 to September 19, 2010.
Cotton, Processed, Not Spun..... 10,205 kilograms... September 11, 2008 to September 10, 2009.
3,995 kilograms.... September 11, 2009 to September 10, 2010.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.[FR Doc. E9-11108 Filed 5-12-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-10-P
