Reimbursement for Interment Costs, 22103-22104 [E9-10982]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 12, 2009 / Rules and Regulations remain on-scene to continue to enforce the security zone. * * * * * (e) Notice of security zone. The COTP will inform the public of the existence or status of the security zones around escorted vessels in the regulated area by broadcast notices to mariners, normally issued at 30-minute intervals while the security zones remains in effect. Escorted vessels will be identified by the presence of Coast Guard assets or other Federal, State or local law enforcement agency assets. * * * * * Dated: March 27, 2009. E.M. Stanton, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the Port Mobile. [FR Doc. E9–10969 Filed 5–11–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–15–P DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS 38 CFR Part 3 RIN 2900–AM98 Reimbursement for Interment Costs Department of Veterans Affairs. Final rule. AGENCY: erowe on PROD1PC64 with RULES ACTION: SUMMARY: This document amends the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) adjudication regulations on burial benefits to incorporate a change made by the Dr. James Allen Veteran Vision Equity Act of 2007. Specifically, this document eliminates a 2-year time limitation for States to file with VA claims for reimbursement of interment costs. The removal of this time limitation is necessary to conform the regulations to recent legislation and governing statutes. DATES: Effective Date: This amendment is effective May 12, 2009. Applicability Date: In accordance with section 202(a)(2) of the Dr. James Allen Veteran Vision Equity Act of 2007, this amendment will apply with respect to interments and inurnments of unclaimed remains of deceased veterans occurring on or after October 1, 2006. This amendment will apply to all other interments and inurnments occurring on or after the date of publication in the Federal Register. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Kniffen, Chief of Regulations Staff (211D), Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–9725. VerDate Nov<24>2008 13:58 May 11, 2009 Jkt 217001 Section 3.1604 of title 38, Code of Federal Regulations, governs VA burial benefits when non-VA sources have paid or contributed to burial expenses. Section 3.1604(d) governs payment of the plot or interment allowance to a State or political subdivision of a State. Section 3.1604(d)(2) governs claims for the plot or interment allowance, and the second sentence in § 3.1604(d)(2) requires that such a claim be filed with VA within 2 years after the permanent burial or cremation of the body. Section 202(a) of the Dr. James Allen Veteran Vision Equity Act of 2007, Public Law 110– 157, repealed this second sentence as it pertains to unclaimed remains of a deceased veteran. Although the legislation removed the 2-year time limit only for claims regarding the unclaimed remains of a deceased veteran, we have decided to eliminate the 2-year time limit on all claims for plot or interment allowances. Currently, 38 U.S.C. 2304 contains the only statutory time limitation on the filing of an application for burial benefits within title 38, United States Code. Section 2304 requires that applications for payment of the burial allowance for non-service-connected deaths under 38 U.S.C. 2302 must be filed within 2 years after the burial of the veteran. However, this time limit does not extend to the plot or interment allowance authorized by 38 U.S.C. 2303(b), the benefit § 3.1604(d)(2) governs. Therefore, we are removing the second and the third sentences of current § 3.1604(d)(2), which limit the time for filing claims for the plot or interment allowance under section 2303(b). SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Administrative Procedure Act This final rule merely conforms VA regulations governing burial benefits to a recent legislative change and relieves a restriction (eliminates a time limit). Accordingly, there is good cause for dispensing with the notice-andcomment and delayed-effective-date procedures otherwise required by 5 U.S.C. 553 because such procedures are impractical, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest. Paperwork Reduction Act This document contains no provisions constituting a collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501–3521). Regulatory Flexibility Act The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities as they are PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 22103 defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. The Secretary does acknowledge that this final rule may affect some States and political subdivisions of States, including a few political subdivisions of States that may be considered small entities; however, the economic impact is not significant. This final rule does not impose any new requirements on States or political subdivisions of States in order to receive the burial benefits governed by 38 CFR 3.1604. It merely eliminates the time restriction on when they may file for such benefits. To the extent that small entities are affected, the impact of this amendment is both minimal and entirely beneficial. Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this final rule is exempt from the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of sections 603 and 604. Executive Order 12866 Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits (including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Executive Order classifies a ‘‘significant regulatory action,’’ requiring review by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), as any regulatory action that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) create a serious inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by another agency; (3) materially alter the budgetary impact of entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy issues arising out of legal mandates, the President’s priorities, or the principles set forth in the Executive Order. The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy implications of this final rule have been examined, and it has been determined not to be a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866. Unfunded Mandates The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM 12MYR1 22104 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 12, 2009 / Rules and Regulations expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, or by the private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually for inflation) in any year. This final rule would have no such effect on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers and Titles The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers and titles for this rule are 64.101, Burial Expenses Allowance for Veterans; 64.201, National Cemeteries; 64.203, State Cemetery Grants. List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3 Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Disability benefits, Health care, Pensions, Radioactive materials, Veterans, Vietnam. Approved: April 9, 2009. John R. Gingrich, Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs. For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 38 CFR part 3 is amended as follows: ■ PART 3—ADJUDICATION Subpart B—Burial Benefits 1. The authority citation for part 3, subpart B continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 105 Stat. 386, 38 U.S.C. 501(a), 2302–2308, unless otherwise noted. § 3.1604 [Amended] 2. Amend § 3.1604(d)(2) by removing the second and third sentences. ■ [FR Doc. E9–10982 Filed 5–11–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION 47 CFR Part 1 [MD Docket No. 08–65; FCC 09–21] Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2008 erowe on PROD1PC64 with RULES AGENCY: Federal Communications Commission. ACTION: Final rule. SUMMARY: In this document, the Commission adopts a new methodology for calculating regulatory fees for international submarine cable operators. Beginning in FY 2009, the Commission will calculate regulatory fees for international submarine cable operators on a per cable landing license basis, with higher fees being assessed for larger submarine cable systems and VerDate Nov<24>2008 13:58 May 11, 2009 Jkt 217001 lower fees for smaller systems. However, this change in methodology does not amend the licensing rules regarding submarine cable systems, nor does it change the methodology on how the Commission calculates regulatory fees for terrestrial and satellite facilities—these facilities will continue to be assessed on a per 64 kbps circuit basis. DATES: Effective July 13, 2009, which pursuant to section 9(b)(3) of the Communications Act, is 90 days from date of notification to Congress. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark Stone, Office of Managing Director at (202) 418–0816. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Adopted: March 17, 2009. Released: March 24, 2009. By the Commission: Acting Chairman Copps and Commissioners Adelstein and McDowell issuing separate statements. I. Introduction 1. In this Second Report and Order, the Commission adopts a new methodology for calculating regulatory fees from international submarine cable operators.1 Beginning with Fiscal Year (‘‘FY’’) 2009, the Commission will calculate these regulatory fees on a per cable landing license basis, with higher fees for larger submarine cable systems and lower fees for smaller systems. In our FY 2008 regulatory fee Report and Order adopted on August 1, 2008 we agreed to evaluate further the issue of regulatory fees paid by submarine cable operators, which are a sub-set of carriers that pay International Bearer Circuit (‘‘IBC’’) fees, and release a Second Report and Order with a new regulatory fee methodology for submarine cable operators.2 The new methodology we 1 This regulatory fee methodology only applies to international submarine cable systems that connect the United States with international points, and not to submarine cable systems connecting points within the United States, such as systems connecting the Hawaiian Islands or Alaska to the mainland. 2 Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2008, MD Docket No. 08–65, RM– 11312, Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 08–182 (rel. Aug. 8, 2008) (‘‘FY 2008 Report and Order’’). We use the term ‘‘IBC’’ in this proceeding as a general way of referring to this regulatory fee category; however, as we discuss below, our per cable landing license methodology we adopt in this order does not apply to terrestrial and satellite facilities. Comments cited in this Second Report and Order are comments to our FY 2008 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking, see Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2008, MD Docket No. 08–65, RM–11312, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7987 (2008) (‘‘FY 2008 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking’’), and are listed in Appendix C to the FY 2008 Report and Order. PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 adopt here is based on a proposal (the ‘‘Consensus Proposal’’) by a large group of submarine cable operators, representing both common carriers and non-common carriers with both large and small submarine cable systems.3 The new methodology allocates IBC costs among service providers in an equitable and competitively neutral manner, without distinguishing between common carriers and non-common carriers, by assessing a flat per cable landing license fee for all submarine cable systems.4 In addition to being more equitable, we anticipate that the new methodology will encourage compliance with our regulatory fee requirements. II. Background 2. For several years, submarine cable operators have asked the Commission to revise the historic per circuit regulatory fee methodology for submarine cable systems. We discussed this issue in our FY 2004 regulatory fee proceeding where Tyco Telecommunications (US), Inc. challenged the Commission’s regulatory fee methodology, arguing, inter alia, that our capacity-based methodology was favoring older lower capacity submarine cable systems and that non-common carrier submarine cable operators should have their own separate category and pay a per-cable 3 See Letter from Kent D. Bressie, Harris, Wiltshire, and Grannis, to Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, FCC, Sept. 23, 2008 (attachment is the ‘‘Consensus Proposal’’). The parties to the Consensus Proposal are: AT&T, Verizon, Apollo Submarine Cable System, Ltd.; Brasil Telecom of America, Inc.; Columbus Networks USA, Inc.; ARCOS–1 USA, Inc.; A.SUR Net, Inc.; Level 3 Communications, LLC; Hibernia-Atlantic US LLC; Marine Cable Corp.; Pacific Crossing Limited and its subsidiary PC Landing Corp.; Reliance Globalcom Limited and its indirect subsidiary FLAG Network USA Limited; and Tata Communications (US) Inc. Qwest Communications International, Inc. (‘‘Qwest’’) also supports the Consensus Proposal. See Letter from Melissa E. Newman, Qwest, to Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, FCC, Sept. 29, 2008. GU Holdings, Inc., an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Google, Inc. also supports the Consensus Proposal. See Letter from Richard S. Whitt, Google, Inc., to Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, FCC, Oct. 3, 2008. Pacific Crossing Limited and PC Landing Corp. contend that the Commission should adopt the Consensus Proposal and also further examine the regulatory fee methodology in this docket or in the FY 2009 regulatory fee proceeding to determine if a portion of the regulatory fee burden should be directly allocated to international common carriers. See Letter from Martin L. Stern, K&L Gates LLP, to Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, FCC, Sept. 25, 2008. 4 Terrestrial and satellite facilities do not have cable landing licenses and will continue to pay regulatory fees on a per circuit basis, under our historic methodology, as clarified herein. We have not received comments or ex partes specifically requesting a change in the regulatory fee rules for these entities. E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM 12MYR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 12, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22103-22104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10982]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

38 CFR Part 3

RIN 2900-AM98


Reimbursement for Interment Costs

AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.

ACTION: Final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document amends the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) 
adjudication regulations on burial benefits to incorporate a change 
made by the Dr. James Allen Veteran Vision Equity Act of 2007. 
Specifically, this document eliminates a 2-year time limitation for 
States to file with VA claims for reimbursement of interment costs. The 
removal of this time limitation is necessary to conform the regulations 
to recent legislation and governing statutes.

DATES: Effective Date: This amendment is effective May 12, 2009.
    Applicability Date: In accordance with section 202(a)(2) of the Dr. 
James Allen Veteran Vision Equity Act of 2007, this amendment will 
apply with respect to interments and inurnments of unclaimed remains of 
deceased veterans occurring on or after October 1, 2006. This amendment 
will apply to all other interments and inurnments occurring on or after 
the date of publication in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Kniffen, Chief of Regulations 
Staff (211D), Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits 
Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, 
NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-9725.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3.1604 of title 38, Code of Federal 
Regulations, governs VA burial benefits when non-VA sources have paid 
or contributed to burial expenses. Section 3.1604(d) governs payment of 
the plot or interment allowance to a State or political subdivision of 
a State. Section 3.1604(d)(2) governs claims for the plot or interment 
allowance, and the second sentence in Sec.  3.1604(d)(2) requires that 
such a claim be filed with VA within 2 years after the permanent burial 
or cremation of the body. Section 202(a) of the Dr. James Allen Veteran 
Vision Equity Act of 2007, Public Law 110-157, repealed this second 
sentence as it pertains to unclaimed remains of a deceased veteran.
    Although the legislation removed the 2-year time limit only for 
claims regarding the unclaimed remains of a deceased veteran, we have 
decided to eliminate the 2-year time limit on all claims for plot or 
interment allowances.
    Currently, 38 U.S.C. 2304 contains the only statutory time 
limitation on the filing of an application for burial benefits within 
title 38, United States Code. Section 2304 requires that applications 
for payment of the burial allowance for non-service-connected deaths 
under 38 U.S.C. 2302 must be filed within 2 years after the burial of 
the veteran. However, this time limit does not extend to the plot or 
interment allowance authorized by 38 U.S.C. 2303(b), the benefit Sec.  
3.1604(d)(2) governs. Therefore, we are removing the second and the 
third sentences of current Sec.  3.1604(d)(2), which limit the time for 
filing claims for the plot or interment allowance under section 
2303(b).

Administrative Procedure Act

    This final rule merely conforms VA regulations governing burial 
benefits to a recent legislative change and relieves a restriction 
(eliminates a time limit). Accordingly, there is good cause for 
dispensing with the notice-and-comment and delayed-effective-date 
procedures otherwise required by 5 U.S.C. 553 because such procedures 
are impractical, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest.

Paperwork Reduction Act

    This document contains no provisions constituting a collection of 
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).

Regulatory Flexibility Act

    The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a 
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities 
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612. The Secretary does acknowledge that this final rule may affect 
some States and political subdivisions of States, including a few 
political subdivisions of States that may be considered small entities; 
however, the economic impact is not significant. This final rule does 
not impose any new requirements on States or political subdivisions of 
States in order to receive the burial benefits governed by 38 CFR 
3.1604. It merely eliminates the time restriction on when they may file 
for such benefits. To the extent that small entities are affected, the 
impact of this amendment is both minimal and entirely beneficial. 
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this final rule is exempt from 
the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of 
sections 603 and 604.

Executive Order 12866

    Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and 
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is 
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits 
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety, 
and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Executive 
Order classifies a ``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review 
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), as any regulatory action 
that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect 
on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a 
material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity, 
competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State, 
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) create a serious 
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by 
another agency; (3) materially alter the budgetary impact of 
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and 
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy 
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or 
the principles set forth in the Executive Order.
    The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy 
implications of this final rule have been examined, and it has been 
determined not to be a significant regulatory action under Executive 
Order 12866.

Unfunded Mandates

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and 
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the

[[Page 22104]]

expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate, 
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually 
for inflation) in any year. This final rule would have no such effect 
on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.

Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers and Titles

    The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers and 
titles for this rule are 64.101, Burial Expenses Allowance for 
Veterans; 64.201, National Cemeteries; 64.203, State Cemetery Grants.

List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3

    Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Disability benefits, 
Health care, Pensions, Radioactive materials, Veterans, Vietnam.

    Approved: April 9, 2009.
John R. Gingrich,
Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs.

0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 38 CFR part 3 is amended as 
follows:

PART 3--ADJUDICATION

Subpart B--Burial Benefits

0
1. The authority citation for part 3, subpart B continues to read as 
follows:

    Authority:  105 Stat. 386, 38 U.S.C. 501(a), 2302-2308, unless 
otherwise noted.

Sec.  3.1604  [Amended]

0
2. Amend Sec.  3.1604(d)(2) by removing the second and third sentences.

[FR Doc. E9-10982 Filed 5-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.