Reimbursement for Interment Costs, 22103-22104 [E9-10982]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 12, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
remain on-scene to continue to enforce
the security zone.
*
*
*
*
*
(e) Notice of security zone. The COTP
will inform the public of the existence
or status of the security zones around
escorted vessels in the regulated area by
broadcast notices to mariners, normally
issued at 30-minute intervals while the
security zones remains in effect.
Escorted vessels will be identified by
the presence of Coast Guard assets or
other Federal, State or local law
enforcement agency assets.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: March 27, 2009.
E.M. Stanton,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard Captain of the
Port Mobile.
[FR Doc. E9–10969 Filed 5–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS
AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900–AM98
Reimbursement for Interment Costs
Department of Veterans Affairs.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
erowe on PROD1PC64 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This document amends the
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
adjudication regulations on burial
benefits to incorporate a change made
by the Dr. James Allen Veteran Vision
Equity Act of 2007. Specifically, this
document eliminates a 2-year time
limitation for States to file with VA
claims for reimbursement of interment
costs. The removal of this time
limitation is necessary to conform the
regulations to recent legislation and
governing statutes.
DATES: Effective Date: This amendment
is effective May 12, 2009.
Applicability Date: In accordance
with section 202(a)(2) of the Dr. James
Allen Veteran Vision Equity Act of
2007, this amendment will apply with
respect to interments and inurnments of
unclaimed remains of deceased veterans
occurring on or after October 1, 2006.
This amendment will apply to all other
interments and inurnments occurring on
or after the date of publication in the
Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Thomas Kniffen, Chief of Regulations
Staff (211D), Compensation and Pension
Service, Veterans Benefits
Administration, Department of Veterans
Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue, NW.,
Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461–9725.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:58 May 11, 2009
Jkt 217001
Section
3.1604 of title 38, Code of Federal
Regulations, governs VA burial benefits
when non-VA sources have paid or
contributed to burial expenses. Section
3.1604(d) governs payment of the plot or
interment allowance to a State or
political subdivision of a State. Section
3.1604(d)(2) governs claims for the plot
or interment allowance, and the second
sentence in § 3.1604(d)(2) requires that
such a claim be filed with VA within 2
years after the permanent burial or
cremation of the body. Section 202(a) of
the Dr. James Allen Veteran Vision
Equity Act of 2007, Public Law 110–
157, repealed this second sentence as it
pertains to unclaimed remains of a
deceased veteran.
Although the legislation removed the
2-year time limit only for claims
regarding the unclaimed remains of a
deceased veteran, we have decided to
eliminate the 2-year time limit on all
claims for plot or interment allowances.
Currently, 38 U.S.C. 2304 contains the
only statutory time limitation on the
filing of an application for burial
benefits within title 38, United States
Code. Section 2304 requires that
applications for payment of the burial
allowance for non-service-connected
deaths under 38 U.S.C. 2302 must be
filed within 2 years after the burial of
the veteran. However, this time limit
does not extend to the plot or interment
allowance authorized by 38 U.S.C.
2303(b), the benefit § 3.1604(d)(2)
governs. Therefore, we are removing the
second and the third sentences of
current § 3.1604(d)(2), which limit the
time for filing claims for the plot or
interment allowance under section
2303(b).
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Administrative Procedure Act
This final rule merely conforms VA
regulations governing burial benefits to
a recent legislative change and relieves
a restriction (eliminates a time limit).
Accordingly, there is good cause for
dispensing with the notice-andcomment and delayed-effective-date
procedures otherwise required by 5
U.S.C. 553 because such procedures are
impractical, unnecessary, and contrary
to the public interest.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions
constituting a collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44
U.S.C. 3501–3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that
this final rule will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities as they are
PO 00000
Frm 00015
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
22103
defined in the Regulatory Flexibility
Act, 5 U.S.C. 601–612. The Secretary
does acknowledge that this final rule
may affect some States and political
subdivisions of States, including a few
political subdivisions of States that may
be considered small entities; however,
the economic impact is not significant.
This final rule does not impose any new
requirements on States or political
subdivisions of States in order to receive
the burial benefits governed by 38 CFR
3.1604. It merely eliminates the time
restriction on when they may file for
such benefits. To the extent that small
entities are affected, the impact of this
amendment is both minimal and
entirely beneficial. Therefore, pursuant
to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this final rule is
exempt from the initial and final
regulatory flexibility analysis
requirements of sections 603 and 604.
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs
agencies to assess all costs and benefits
of available regulatory alternatives and,
when regulation is necessary, to select
regulatory approaches that maximize
net benefits (including potential
economic, environmental, public health
and safety, and other advantages;
distributive impacts; and equity). The
Executive Order classifies a ‘‘significant
regulatory action,’’ requiring review by
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB), as any regulatory action that is
likely to result in a rule that may: (1)
Have an annual effect on the economy
of $100 million or more or adversely
affect in a material way the economy, a
sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment,
public health or safety, or State, local,
or tribal governments or communities;
(2) create a serious inconsistency or
otherwise interfere with an action taken
or planned by another agency; (3)
materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan
programs or the rights and obligations of
recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel
legal or policy issues arising out of legal
mandates, the President’s priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive
Order.
The economic, interagency,
budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this final rule have been
examined, and it has been determined
not to be a significant regulatory action
under Executive Order 12866.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C. 1532, that
agencies prepare an assessment of
anticipated costs and benefits before
issuing any rule that may result in the
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
22104
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 90 / Tuesday, May 12, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
expenditure by State, local, and tribal
governments, in the aggregate, or by the
private sector, of $100 million or more
(adjusted annually for inflation) in any
year. This final rule would have no such
effect on State, local, and tribal
governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
Numbers and Titles
The Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance program numbers and titles
for this rule are 64.101, Burial Expenses
Allowance for Veterans; 64.201,
National Cemeteries; 64.203, State
Cemetery Grants.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and
procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Health care, Pensions, Radioactive
materials, Veterans, Vietnam.
Approved: April 9, 2009.
John R. Gingrich,
Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs.
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, 38 CFR part 3 is amended as
follows:
■
PART 3—ADJUDICATION
Subpart B—Burial Benefits
1. The authority citation for part 3,
subpart B continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 105 Stat. 386, 38 U.S.C. 501(a),
2302–2308, unless otherwise noted.
§ 3.1604
[Amended]
2. Amend § 3.1604(d)(2) by removing
the second and third sentences.
■
[FR Doc. E9–10982 Filed 5–11–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
47 CFR Part 1
[MD Docket No. 08–65; FCC 09–21]
Assessment and Collection of
Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2008
erowe on PROD1PC64 with RULES
AGENCY: Federal Communications
Commission.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: In this document, the
Commission adopts a new methodology
for calculating regulatory fees for
international submarine cable operators.
Beginning in FY 2009, the Commission
will calculate regulatory fees for
international submarine cable operators
on a per cable landing license basis,
with higher fees being assessed for
larger submarine cable systems and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
13:58 May 11, 2009
Jkt 217001
lower fees for smaller systems.
However, this change in methodology
does not amend the licensing rules
regarding submarine cable systems, nor
does it change the methodology on how
the Commission calculates regulatory
fees for terrestrial and satellite
facilities—these facilities will continue
to be assessed on a per 64 kbps circuit
basis.
DATES: Effective July 13, 2009, which
pursuant to section 9(b)(3) of the
Communications Act, is 90 days from
date of notification to Congress.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Mark Stone, Office of Managing Director
at (202) 418–0816.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Adopted: March 17, 2009.
Released: March 24, 2009.
By the Commission: Acting Chairman
Copps and Commissioners Adelstein
and McDowell issuing separate
statements.
I. Introduction
1. In this Second Report and Order,
the Commission adopts a new
methodology for calculating regulatory
fees from international submarine cable
operators.1 Beginning with Fiscal Year
(‘‘FY’’) 2009, the Commission will
calculate these regulatory fees on a per
cable landing license basis, with higher
fees for larger submarine cable systems
and lower fees for smaller systems. In
our FY 2008 regulatory fee Report and
Order adopted on August 1, 2008 we
agreed to evaluate further the issue of
regulatory fees paid by submarine cable
operators, which are a sub-set of carriers
that pay International Bearer Circuit
(‘‘IBC’’) fees, and release a Second
Report and Order with a new regulatory
fee methodology for submarine cable
operators.2 The new methodology we
1 This regulatory fee methodology only applies to
international submarine cable systems that connect
the United States with international points, and not
to submarine cable systems connecting points
within the United States, such as systems
connecting the Hawaiian Islands or Alaska to the
mainland.
2 Assessment and Collection of Regulatory Fees
for Fiscal Year 2008, MD Docket No. 08–65, RM–
11312, Report and Order and Further Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, FCC 08–182 (rel. Aug. 8,
2008) (‘‘FY 2008 Report and Order’’). We use the
term ‘‘IBC’’ in this proceeding as a general way of
referring to this regulatory fee category; however, as
we discuss below, our per cable landing license
methodology we adopt in this order does not apply
to terrestrial and satellite facilities.
Comments cited in this Second Report and Order
are comments to our FY 2008 Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking, see Assessment and Collection of
Regulatory Fees for Fiscal Year 2008, MD Docket
No. 08–65, RM–11312, Notice of Proposed
Rulemaking and Order, 23 FCC Rcd 7987 (2008)
(‘‘FY 2008 Notice of Proposed Rulemaking’’), and
are listed in Appendix C to the FY 2008 Report and
Order.
PO 00000
Frm 00016
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
adopt here is based on a proposal (the
‘‘Consensus Proposal’’) by a large group
of submarine cable operators,
representing both common carriers and
non-common carriers with both large
and small submarine cable systems.3
The new methodology allocates IBC
costs among service providers in an
equitable and competitively neutral
manner, without distinguishing between
common carriers and non-common
carriers, by assessing a flat per cable
landing license fee for all submarine
cable systems.4 In addition to being
more equitable, we anticipate that the
new methodology will encourage
compliance with our regulatory fee
requirements.
II. Background
2. For several years, submarine cable
operators have asked the Commission to
revise the historic per circuit regulatory
fee methodology for submarine cable
systems. We discussed this issue in our
FY 2004 regulatory fee proceeding
where Tyco Telecommunications (US),
Inc. challenged the Commission’s
regulatory fee methodology, arguing,
inter alia, that our capacity-based
methodology was favoring older lower
capacity submarine cable systems and
that non-common carrier submarine
cable operators should have their own
separate category and pay a per-cable
3 See Letter from Kent D. Bressie, Harris,
Wiltshire, and Grannis, to Marlene H. Dortch, Office
of the Secretary, FCC, Sept. 23, 2008 (attachment is
the ‘‘Consensus Proposal’’). The parties to the
Consensus Proposal are: AT&T, Verizon, Apollo
Submarine Cable System, Ltd.; Brasil Telecom of
America, Inc.; Columbus Networks USA, Inc.;
ARCOS–1 USA, Inc.; A.SUR Net, Inc.; Level 3
Communications, LLC; Hibernia-Atlantic US LLC;
Marine Cable Corp.; Pacific Crossing Limited and
its subsidiary PC Landing Corp.; Reliance
Globalcom Limited and its indirect subsidiary
FLAG Network USA Limited; and Tata
Communications (US) Inc. Qwest Communications
International, Inc. (‘‘Qwest’’) also supports the
Consensus Proposal. See Letter from Melissa E.
Newman, Qwest, to Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the
Secretary, FCC, Sept. 29, 2008. GU Holdings, Inc.,
an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Google, Inc.
also supports the Consensus Proposal. See Letter
from Richard S. Whitt, Google, Inc., to Marlene H.
Dortch, Office of the Secretary, FCC, Oct. 3, 2008.
Pacific Crossing Limited and PC Landing Corp.
contend that the Commission should adopt the
Consensus Proposal and also further examine the
regulatory fee methodology in this docket or in the
FY 2009 regulatory fee proceeding to determine if
a portion of the regulatory fee burden should be
directly allocated to international common carriers.
See Letter from Martin L. Stern, K&L Gates LLP, to
Marlene H. Dortch, Office of the Secretary, FCC,
Sept. 25, 2008.
4 Terrestrial and satellite facilities do not have
cable landing licenses and will continue to pay
regulatory fees on a per circuit basis, under our
historic methodology, as clarified herein. We have
not received comments or ex partes specifically
requesting a change in the regulatory fee rules for
these entities.
E:\FR\FM\12MYR1.SGM
12MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 90 (Tuesday, May 12, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 22103-22104]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10982]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
38 CFR Part 3
RIN 2900-AM98
Reimbursement for Interment Costs
AGENCY: Department of Veterans Affairs.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This document amends the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA)
adjudication regulations on burial benefits to incorporate a change
made by the Dr. James Allen Veteran Vision Equity Act of 2007.
Specifically, this document eliminates a 2-year time limitation for
States to file with VA claims for reimbursement of interment costs. The
removal of this time limitation is necessary to conform the regulations
to recent legislation and governing statutes.
DATES: Effective Date: This amendment is effective May 12, 2009.
Applicability Date: In accordance with section 202(a)(2) of the Dr.
James Allen Veteran Vision Equity Act of 2007, this amendment will
apply with respect to interments and inurnments of unclaimed remains of
deceased veterans occurring on or after October 1, 2006. This amendment
will apply to all other interments and inurnments occurring on or after
the date of publication in the Federal Register.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Thomas Kniffen, Chief of Regulations
Staff (211D), Compensation and Pension Service, Veterans Benefits
Administration, Department of Veterans Affairs, 810 Vermont Avenue,
NW., Washington, DC 20420, (202) 461-9725.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 3.1604 of title 38, Code of Federal
Regulations, governs VA burial benefits when non-VA sources have paid
or contributed to burial expenses. Section 3.1604(d) governs payment of
the plot or interment allowance to a State or political subdivision of
a State. Section 3.1604(d)(2) governs claims for the plot or interment
allowance, and the second sentence in Sec. 3.1604(d)(2) requires that
such a claim be filed with VA within 2 years after the permanent burial
or cremation of the body. Section 202(a) of the Dr. James Allen Veteran
Vision Equity Act of 2007, Public Law 110-157, repealed this second
sentence as it pertains to unclaimed remains of a deceased veteran.
Although the legislation removed the 2-year time limit only for
claims regarding the unclaimed remains of a deceased veteran, we have
decided to eliminate the 2-year time limit on all claims for plot or
interment allowances.
Currently, 38 U.S.C. 2304 contains the only statutory time
limitation on the filing of an application for burial benefits within
title 38, United States Code. Section 2304 requires that applications
for payment of the burial allowance for non-service-connected deaths
under 38 U.S.C. 2302 must be filed within 2 years after the burial of
the veteran. However, this time limit does not extend to the plot or
interment allowance authorized by 38 U.S.C. 2303(b), the benefit Sec.
3.1604(d)(2) governs. Therefore, we are removing the second and the
third sentences of current Sec. 3.1604(d)(2), which limit the time for
filing claims for the plot or interment allowance under section
2303(b).
Administrative Procedure Act
This final rule merely conforms VA regulations governing burial
benefits to a recent legislative change and relieves a restriction
(eliminates a time limit). Accordingly, there is good cause for
dispensing with the notice-and-comment and delayed-effective-date
procedures otherwise required by 5 U.S.C. 553 because such procedures
are impractical, unnecessary, and contrary to the public interest.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This document contains no provisions constituting a collection of
information under the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501-3521).
Regulatory Flexibility Act
The Secretary hereby certifies that this final rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
as they are defined in the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601-
612. The Secretary does acknowledge that this final rule may affect
some States and political subdivisions of States, including a few
political subdivisions of States that may be considered small entities;
however, the economic impact is not significant. This final rule does
not impose any new requirements on States or political subdivisions of
States in order to receive the burial benefits governed by 38 CFR
3.1604. It merely eliminates the time restriction on when they may file
for such benefits. To the extent that small entities are affected, the
impact of this amendment is both minimal and entirely beneficial.
Therefore, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 605(b), this final rule is exempt from
the initial and final regulatory flexibility analysis requirements of
sections 603 and 604.
Executive Order 12866
Executive Order 12866 directs agencies to assess all costs and
benefits of available regulatory alternatives and, when regulation is
necessary, to select regulatory approaches that maximize net benefits
(including potential economic, environmental, public health and safety,
and other advantages; distributive impacts; and equity). The Executive
Order classifies a ``significant regulatory action,'' requiring review
by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), as any regulatory action
that is likely to result in a rule that may: (1) Have an annual effect
on the economy of $100 million or more or adversely affect in a
material way the economy, a sector of the economy, productivity,
competition, jobs, the environment, public health or safety, or State,
local, or tribal governments or communities; (2) create a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interfere with an action taken or planned by
another agency; (3) materially alter the budgetary impact of
entitlements, grants, user fees, or loan programs or the rights and
obligations of recipients thereof; or (4) raise novel legal or policy
issues arising out of legal mandates, the President's priorities, or
the principles set forth in the Executive Order.
The economic, interagency, budgetary, legal, and policy
implications of this final rule have been examined, and it has been
determined not to be a significant regulatory action under Executive
Order 12866.
Unfunded Mandates
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 requires, at 2 U.S.C.
1532, that agencies prepare an assessment of anticipated costs and
benefits before issuing any rule that may result in the
[[Page 22104]]
expenditure by State, local, and tribal governments, in the aggregate,
or by the private sector, of $100 million or more (adjusted annually
for inflation) in any year. This final rule would have no such effect
on State, local, and tribal governments, or on the private sector.
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Numbers and Titles
The Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance program numbers and
titles for this rule are 64.101, Burial Expenses Allowance for
Veterans; 64.201, National Cemeteries; 64.203, State Cemetery Grants.
List of Subjects in 38 CFR Part 3
Administrative practice and procedure, Claims, Disability benefits,
Health care, Pensions, Radioactive materials, Veterans, Vietnam.
Approved: April 9, 2009.
John R. Gingrich,
Chief of Staff, Department of Veterans Affairs.
0
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 38 CFR part 3 is amended as
follows:
PART 3--ADJUDICATION
Subpart B--Burial Benefits
0
1. The authority citation for part 3, subpart B continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 105 Stat. 386, 38 U.S.C. 501(a), 2302-2308, unless
otherwise noted.
Sec. 3.1604 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 3.1604(d)(2) by removing the second and third sentences.
[FR Doc. E9-10982 Filed 5-11-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P