Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request-Models of SNAP-Ed and Evaluation Study, 21619-21621 [E9-10745]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
21619
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 74, No. 88
Friday, May 8, 2009
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
May 5, 2009.
The Department of Agriculture has
submitted the following information
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Comments
regarding (a) Whether the collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(b) the accuracy of the agency’s estimate
of burden including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used; (c)
ways to enhance the quality, utility and
clarity of the information to be
collected; (d) ways to minimize the
burden of the collection of information
on those who are to respond, including
through the use of appropriate
automated, electronic, mechanical, or
other technological collection
techniques or other forms of information
technology should be addressed to: Desk
Officer for Agriculture, Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs,
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB),
OIRA_Submission@OMB.EOP.GOV or
fax (202) 395–5806 and to Departmental
Clearance Office, USDA, OCIO, Mail
Stop 7602, Washington, DC 20250–
7602. Comments regarding these
information collections are best assured
of having their full effect if received
within 30 days of this notification.
Copies of the submission(s) may be
obtained by calling (202) 720–8958.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:51 May 07, 2009
Jkt 217001
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
Agency Information Collection
Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request—Models of SNAPEd and Evaluation Study
Title: National Animal Health
Laboratory Network.
OMB Control Number: 0579–NEW.
Summary of Collection: The Animal
and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS) is proposing to add a new
database, entitled National Animal
Health Laboratory Network (NAHLN),
which will be used to support activities
conducted by the agency and maintain
records pursuant to its missions and
responsibilities authorized by the
Animal Health Protection Act (7 U.S.C.
8301–8317); Public Health Security and
Bioterrorism Preparedness and
Response Act of 2002, 116 Stat. 674–678
(Pub. L. 107–188); Homeland Security
Presidential Directive-7 (HSPD–7); and
Homeland Security Presidential
Directive-9 (HSPD–9). These
requirements include the development
of a national laboratory network for
veterinary health that integrates existing
Federal and State laboratory resources,
are interconnected, and utilize
standardized diagnostic protocols and
procedures.
Need and Use of the Information: The
purpose of NAHLN is to coordinate and
network Federal laboratory capacity
with the capacity and extensive
infrastructure (facilities, professional
expertise, and support) of State and
university laboratories. APHIS uses the
system to enhance early detection of
foreign animal disease agents and newly
emerging diseases, to better respond to
animal health emergencies (including
bioterrorist events) that threaten the
nation’s food supply and public health,
and to assist in assessing the nation’s
animal health status through targeted
surveillance and shared animal health
diagnostic data.
Description of Respondents: State,
Local or Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 89.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
On occasion.
Total Burden Hours: 8,056.
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–10771 Filed 5–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Food and Nutrition Service
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service
(FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
SUMMARY: In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and
other public agencies to comment on the
proposed collection of data for the
Models of SNAP-Ed and Evaluation
Study. This is a NEW information
collection. The goal of Supplemental
Nutrition Assistance Program Education
(SNAP-Ed) is to improve the likelihood
that SNAP participants and eligibles
will make healthy choices within a
limited budget and choose active
lifestyles consistent with the current
Dietary Guidelines for Americans and
the USDA Food Guidance System. With
limited resources, SNAP-Ed nutrition
educators attempt to tailor their
messages to fit the varying needs of
differing populations and evaluate the
extent to which their efforts result in
positive, voluntary changes in nutrition
behaviors.
The Models of SNAP-Ed and
Evaluation Study will conduct rigorous,
independent evaluations of four SNAPEd demonstration projects. Each of the
demonstration projects will also
conduct an impact evaluation
assessment which will be compared to
FNS’s more rigorous, independent
evaluation. The Models of SNAP-Ed and
Evaluation Study will provide FNS with
sound, independent estimates of the
effectiveness of four SNAP-Ed
approaches, and will provide SNAP-Ed
educators with examples of evaluation
designs that are both feasible and
scientifically robust.
DATES: Written comments must be
submitted on or before July 7, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on (a)
Whether the proposed data collection of
information is necessary for the proper
performance of the functions of the
agency, including whether the
information has practical utility; (b) the
accuracy of the agency’s estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of
information, including the validity of
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
21620
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 88 / Friday, May 8, 2009 / Notices
the methodology and assumptions that
were used; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the
information to be collected; and (d)
ways to minimize the burden of the
collection of information on those who
are to respond, including the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments may be sent to: Steven
Carlson, Director, Office of Research and
Analysis, U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Food and Nutrition Service,
3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1014,
Alexandria, VA 22302. Comments may
also be submitted via fax to the attention
of Steven Carlson at 703–305–2576 or
via email to
Steve.Carslon@fns.usda.gov. Comments
will also be accepted through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for
public inspection at the office of the
Food and Nutrition Service during
regular business hours (8:30 a.m. to 5
p.m., Monday through Friday) at Room
1014, 3101 Park Center Drive,
Alexandria, Virginia 22302.
All responses to this notice will be
summarized and included in the request
for Office of Management and Budget
approval. All comments will also be a
matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Requests for additional information
should be directed to Steven Carlson on
703–305–2017.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Models of SNAP-Ed and
Evaluation.
OMB Number: [not assigned].
Expiration Date: [not assigned].
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: The purposes of the Models
of SNAP-Ed and Evaluation Study are to
(1) demonstrate that nutrition education
through SNAP can bring about
meaningful behavioral change, and (2)
show that nutrition education
implementers can mount meaningful
intervention outcome evaluations.
In fiscal year 2009, four nutrition
education interventions were selected to
participate as demonstration projects for
this study. The four demonstration
projects that will be approved under
their States’ Annual SNAP-Ed Plan are:
The University of Nevada at Reno’s
‘‘All 4 Kids’’ intervention in Head Start
Childcare Centers. FNS will employ an
experimental evaluation design through
which pre and post-intervention
assessments will be conducted at 12
Head Start Centers with 6 serving as
treatment sites and 6 as controls.
Parents will be asked to report on the
eating behaviors of their children.
Additionally, educators at treatment
sites will be interviewed for their
impressions of the effectiveness of the
intervention and their recommendations
for improvement.
The Chickasaw Nation Nutrition
Service ‘‘Eagle Play’’ intervention,
tailored for Native American children.
The FNS evaluation will use a quasiexperimental design in which 6
Pontotoc County, Oklahoma elementary
schools will be demographically
matched to the 6 schools selected to
take part in the intervention. Pre and
post-intervention assessments will be
conducted at both treatment and control
schools. Parents will be surveyed about
the fruit and vegetable consumption of
their children. Educators at treatment
sites will be interviewed for their
impressions of the effectiveness of the
intervention and their recommendations
for improvement.
The Pennsylvania State University’s
‘‘Eating Competencies’’ web-based
nutrition education intervention for
SNAP eligible women, ages 18–45.
Using a randomized control design, FNS
will monitor the impact of the
intervention on fruit and vegetable
consumption as reported by participants
and control subjects. The Pennsylvania
State University nutrition educators will
be informally interviewed for their
Estimated
number of
respondents
Respondent
Responses
annually per
respondent
impressions of the practicality of the
intervention and their recommendations
for improvement.
The New York State Department of
Health’s intervention, ‘‘Eat Well, Play
Hard’’ in Child and Adult Care Food
Program Centers. The quasiexperimental FNS evaluation will
compare pre and post-intervention
responses at 18 treatment and 18 control
centers. Parents will be asked about the
availability of fruits, vegetables and lowfat dairy at home, and their children’s
willingness to consume them. Educators
and Dietitians at treatment sites will be
interviewed for their impressions of the
effectiveness of the intervention and
their recommendations for
improvement.
Affected Public: Individuals or
Households and State, Local or Tribal
Government: Respondent Type—
Parents, educators and dietitians in New
York State; and Parents and educators in
Potontoc County, Oklahoma, and Clark
County, Nevada. Low-income women,
ages 18–45, and educators in
Pennsylvania.
Estimated Number of Respondents:
5,489 (4,717 for parents; 772 for
educators/dietitians). 600 parents of
Head Start pre-school students and 80
educators in Clark County, Nevada;
1,377 parents of pre-K through 3rd grade
children and 90 educators in Pontotoc
County, Oklahoma; 580 women, ages
18–45, and 12 educators in
Pennsylvania; 2,160 parents of 3–4 year
old children and 590 educators and
dietitians in New York Child and Adult
Care Food Program centers.
See the table, below.
Estimated Number of Responses per
Respondent: 2 for parents; 1 for
educators/dietitians.
Estimated Total Annual Responses:
10,206.
Hours per Response: 0.25 for parents;
0.50 for educators/dietitians.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on
Respondents: 2,744.50 (2,358.5 hours
for parents; 386 for educators/
dietitians).
Total annual
responses
Estimated avg.
number of
hours per
response
Estimated total
hours
0.25
0.50
300.00
40.00
0.25
0.50
688.50
45.00
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
Reporting Burden, University of Nevada at Reno, ‘‘All 4 Kids’’
Parent survey .......................................................................
Educator interviews ..............................................................
600
80
2
1
1,200
80
Reporting Burden, Chickasaw Nation Nutrition Service, ‘‘Eagle Play’’
Parent survey .......................................................................
Educator interviews ..............................................................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:51 May 07, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00002
1,377
90
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
2
1
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
2,754
90
08MYN1
21621
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 88 / Friday, May 8, 2009 / Notices
Estimated
number of
respondents
Respondent
Responses
annually per
respondent
Total annual
responses
Estimated avg.
number of
hours per
response
Estimated total
hours
0.25
0.50
290.00
6.00
Reporting Burden, Pennsylvania State University, ‘‘Eating Competencies’’
Participant survey ................................................................
Educator interviews ..............................................................
580
12
2
1
1,160
12
Reporting Burden, New York State Dept. of Health, ‘‘Eat Well, Play Hard’’
Parent survey .......................................................................
Educator/Dietitian interviews ................................................
2,160
590
2
1
4,320
590
0.25
0.50
1,080.00
295.00
Total Reporting Burden ................................................
5,489
........................
10,206
........................
2,744.50
Dated: May 4, 2009.
E. Enrique Gomez,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition
Service.
[FR Doc. E9–10745 Filed 5–7–09; 8:45 am]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Notice of Meeting
AGENCY: Notice of Resource Advisory
Committee, Custer, SD, USDA Forest
Service.
ACTION: Notice of meeting.
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Deschutes Provincial Advisory
Committee (DPAC)
Forest Service, Department of
Agriculture.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Notice of meeting.
SUMMARY: The Deschutes Provincial
Advisory Committee will meet on May
27, 2009, starting at 8 a.m. at the
Deschutes National Forest Supervisor’s
Office, 1001 SW., Emkay Drive, Bend,
Oregon. There will be a 1-hour office
meeting to brief members on the
mapping effort for application of The
Nature Conservancy/Fire Learning
Network restoration principles. Then,
members will go to the field to the
Bend-Ft. Rock Ranger District to view
areas where principles are being
implemented. PAC members will help
identify and prioritize areas for future
restoration. The trip is scheduled to end
at 4:30 p.m. All Deschutes Province
Advisory Committee Meetings are open
to the public and an open public forum
is scheduled from 8:30 to 9 a.m.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
hsrobinson on PROD1PC76 with NOTICES
Chris Mickle, Province Liaison, Crescent
Ranger District, Highway 97, Crescent,
Oregon 97733, Phone (541) 433–3216.
John Allen,
Deschutes National Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E9–10135 Filed 5–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:51 May 07, 2009
Jkt 217001
SUMMARY: Pursuant to authorities in the
Federal Advisory Committee Act (Law
92–463) and Public Law 110–343,
enacted on October 3, 2008,
reauthorizing and amending the Secure
Rural Schools and Community Self
Determination Act of 2000 (Pub. L. 106–
393), the Black Hills National Forest
Custer County Resource Advisory
Committee will meet on Wednesday,
May 13, 2009 in Custer, South Dakota.
The meeting is open to the public.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
meeting on May 13, 2009 will begin at
5:30 p.m. at the Black Hills National
Forest Supervisor’s Office at 25041
North Highway 16, Custer, South
Dakota. Agenda topics will be Project
status update and general business.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Lynn Kolund, Hell Canyon District
Ranger and Designated Federal Official,
at 605–673–4853.
California. Agenda items to be covered
include: (1) Approval of minutes (2)
Handout Discussion (3) Public
Comment (4) Financial Report (5) Subcommittees (6) Matters before the group
(7) Discussion—approval of projects (8)
Next agenda and meeting date.
DATES: The meeting will be held on May
15, 2009, from 9 a.m. until 12 noon.
ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at
the Mendocino Willits Environmental
Center, 630 South Main, Willits,
California.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Roberta Hurt, Committee Coordinator,
USDA, Mendocino National Forest,
Covelo Ranger District, 78150 Covelo
Road, Covelo CA 95428. (707) 983–
6658; e-mail
windmill@willitsonline.com.
The
meeting is open to the public. Persons
who wish to bring matters to the
attention of the Committee may file
written statements with the Committee
staff by May 14, 2009. Public comment
will have the opportunity to address the
committee at the meeting.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Dated: April 29, 2009.
Lee Johnson,
Designated Federal Official.
[FR Doc. E9–10527 Filed 5–7–09; 8:45 am]
Lynn Kolund,
District Ranger.
[FR Doc. E9–10604 Filed 5–7–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–M
BILLING CODE M
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Foreign-Trade Zones Board
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Mendocino Resource Advisory
Committee
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Mendocino County
Resource Advisory Committee will meet
May 15, 2009 (RAC), in Willits,
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
[Docket 20–2009]
Foreign-Trade Zone 29—Louisville, KY;
Application for Subzone; Dow Corning
Corporation (Silicones); Carrollton,
Elizabethtown and Shepherdsville, KY
An application has been submitted to
the Foreign-Trade Zones Board (the
Board) by the Louisville and Jefferson
County Riverport Authority, grantee of
FTZ 29, requesting special-purpose
E:\FR\FM\08MYN1.SGM
08MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 88 (Friday, May 8, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 21619-21621]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10745]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Food and Nutrition Service
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection;
Comment Request--Models of SNAP-Ed and Evaluation Study
AGENCY: Food and Nutrition Service (FNS), USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, this
notice invites the general public and other public agencies to comment
on the proposed collection of data for the Models of SNAP-Ed and
Evaluation Study. This is a NEW information collection. The goal of
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education (SNAP-Ed) is to
improve the likelihood that SNAP participants and eligibles will make
healthy choices within a limited budget and choose active lifestyles
consistent with the current Dietary Guidelines for Americans and the
USDA Food Guidance System. With limited resources, SNAP-Ed nutrition
educators attempt to tailor their messages to fit the varying needs of
differing populations and evaluate the extent to which their efforts
result in positive, voluntary changes in nutrition behaviors.
The Models of SNAP-Ed and Evaluation Study will conduct rigorous,
independent evaluations of four SNAP-Ed demonstration projects. Each of
the demonstration projects will also conduct an impact evaluation
assessment which will be compared to FNS's more rigorous, independent
evaluation. The Models of SNAP-Ed and Evaluation Study will provide FNS
with sound, independent estimates of the effectiveness of four SNAP-Ed
approaches, and will provide SNAP-Ed educators with examples of
evaluation designs that are both feasible and scientifically robust.
DATES: Written comments must be submitted on or before July 7, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Comments are invited on (a) Whether the proposed data
collection of information is necessary for the proper performance of
the functions of the agency, including whether the information has
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the agency's estimate of the
burden of the proposed collection of information, including the
validity of
[[Page 21620]]
the methodology and assumptions that were used; (c) ways to enhance the
quality, utility, and clarity of the information to be collected; and
(d) ways to minimize the burden of the collection of information on
those who are to respond, including the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology.
Comments may be sent to: Steven Carlson, Director, Office of
Research and Analysis, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food and
Nutrition Service, 3101 Park Center Drive, Room 1014, Alexandria, VA
22302. Comments may also be submitted via fax to the attention of
Steven Carlson at 703-305-2576 or via email to
Steve.Carslon@fns.usda.gov. Comments will also be accepted through the
Federal eRulemaking Portal. Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow
the online instructions for submitting comments electronically.
All written comments will be open for public inspection at the
office of the Food and Nutrition Service during regular business hours
(8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday) at Room 1014, 3101 Park
Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia 22302.
All responses to this notice will be summarized and included in the
request for Office of Management and Budget approval. All comments will
also be a matter of public record.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Requests for additional information
should be directed to Steven Carlson on 703-305-2017.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Models of SNAP-Ed and Evaluation.
OMB Number: [not assigned].
Expiration Date: [not assigned].
Type of Request: New collection.
Abstract: The purposes of the Models of SNAP-Ed and Evaluation
Study are to (1) demonstrate that nutrition education through SNAP can
bring about meaningful behavioral change, and (2) show that nutrition
education implementers can mount meaningful intervention outcome
evaluations.
In fiscal year 2009, four nutrition education interventions were
selected to participate as demonstration projects for this study. The
four demonstration projects that will be approved under their States'
Annual SNAP-Ed Plan are:
The University of Nevada at Reno's ``All 4 Kids'' intervention in
Head Start Childcare Centers. FNS will employ an experimental
evaluation design through which pre and post-intervention assessments
will be conducted at 12 Head Start Centers with 6 serving as treatment
sites and 6 as controls. Parents will be asked to report on the eating
behaviors of their children. Additionally, educators at treatment sites
will be interviewed for their impressions of the effectiveness of the
intervention and their recommendations for improvement.
The Chickasaw Nation Nutrition Service ``Eagle Play'' intervention,
tailored for Native American children. The FNS evaluation will use a
quasi-experimental design in which 6 Pontotoc County, Oklahoma
elementary schools will be demographically matched to the 6 schools
selected to take part in the intervention. Pre and post-intervention
assessments will be conducted at both treatment and control schools.
Parents will be surveyed about the fruit and vegetable consumption of
their children. Educators at treatment sites will be interviewed for
their impressions of the effectiveness of the intervention and their
recommendations for improvement.
The Pennsylvania State University's ``Eating Competencies'' web-
based nutrition education intervention for SNAP eligible women, ages
18-45. Using a randomized control design, FNS will monitor the impact
of the intervention on fruit and vegetable consumption as reported by
participants and control subjects. The Pennsylvania State University
nutrition educators will be informally interviewed for their
impressions of the practicality of the intervention and their
recommendations for improvement.
The New York State Department of Health's intervention, ``Eat Well,
Play Hard'' in Child and Adult Care Food Program Centers. The quasi-
experimental FNS evaluation will compare pre and post-intervention
responses at 18 treatment and 18 control centers. Parents will be asked
about the availability of fruits, vegetables and low-fat dairy at home,
and their children's willingness to consume them. Educators and
Dietitians at treatment sites will be interviewed for their impressions
of the effectiveness of the intervention and their recommendations for
improvement.
Affected Public: Individuals or Households and State, Local or
Tribal Government: Respondent Type--Parents, educators and dietitians
in New York State; and Parents and educators in Potontoc County,
Oklahoma, and Clark County, Nevada. Low-income women, ages 18-45, and
educators in Pennsylvania.
Estimated Number of Respondents: 5,489 (4,717 for parents; 772 for
educators/dietitians). 600 parents of Head Start pre-school students
and 80 educators in Clark County, Nevada; 1,377 parents of pre-K
through 3rd grade children and 90 educators in Pontotoc County,
Oklahoma; 580 women, ages 18-45, and 12 educators in Pennsylvania;
2,160 parents of 3-4 year old children and 590 educators and dietitians
in New York Child and Adult Care Food Program centers.
See the table, below.
Estimated Number of Responses per Respondent: 2 for parents; 1 for
educators/dietitians.
Estimated Total Annual Responses: 10,206.
Hours per Response: 0.25 for parents; 0.50 for educators/
dietitians.
Estimated Total Annual Burden on Respondents: 2,744.50 (2,358.5
hours for parents; 386 for educators/dietitians).
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Estimated avg.
Estimated Responses Total annual number of Estimated
Respondent number of annually per responses hours per total hours
respondents respondent response
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reporting Burden, University of Nevada at Reno, ``All 4 Kids''
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parent survey................... 600 2 1,200 0.25 300.00
Educator interviews............. 80 1 80 0.50 40.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reporting Burden, Chickasaw Nation Nutrition Service, ``Eagle Play''
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parent survey................... 1,377 2 2,754 0.25 688.50
Educator interviews............. 90 1 90 0.50 45.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 21621]]
Reporting Burden, Pennsylvania State University, ``Eating Competencies''
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Participant survey.............. 580 2 1,160 0.25 290.00
Educator interviews............. 12 1 12 0.50 6.00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reporting Burden, New York State Dept. of Health, ``Eat Well, Play Hard''
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parent survey................... 2,160 2 4,320 0.25 1,080.00
Educator/Dietitian interviews... 590 1 590 0.50 295.00
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Reporting Burden...... 5,489 .............. 10,206 .............. 2,744.50
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dated: May 4, 2009.
E. Enrique Gomez,
Acting Administrator, Food and Nutrition Service.
[FR Doc. E9-10745 Filed 5-7-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-30-P
