Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, North Coast Unified Air Quality Management District, 20877-20880 [E9-10521]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
agencies to evaluate existing technical
standards when developing a new
regulation. To comply with NTTAA,
EPA must consider and use ‘‘voluntary
consensus standards’’ (VCS) if available
and applicable when developing
programs and policies unless doing so
would be inconsistent with applicable
law or otherwise impractical.
The EPA believes that VCS are
inapplicable to this action. Today’s
action does not require the public to
perform activities conducive to the use
of VCS.
J. Congressional Review Act
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing these rules and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).
These rules will be effective July 6,
2009.
Dated: February 10, 2009.
Jane Diamond,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
Part 52, Chapter I, Title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
■
PART 52 [AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for Part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraph (c)(359)(i)(A)(3), (4)
and (5) to read as follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(359) * * *
(i) * * *
(A) * * *
(3) Rule 100, ‘‘General Provisions,’’
originally adopted on November 3, 1982
and amended on May 19, 2005.
(4) Rule 101, ‘‘Definitions,’’ originally
adopted on November 3, 1982 and
amended on May 19, 2005 and May 15,
2008.
(5) Rule 108, ‘‘Severability of Rules
and Regulations,’’ originally adopted on
May 19, 2005.
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. E9–10509 Filed 5–5–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
K. Petitions for Judicial Review
40 CFR Part 52
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by July 6, 2009.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of these rules for
the purposes of judicial review nor does
it extend the time within which a
petition for judicial review may be filed,
and shall not postpone the effectiveness
of such rule or action. This action may
not be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
[EPA–R09–OAR–2008–0891, FRL–8782–7]
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:14 May 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, North Coast
Unified Air Quality Management
District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the North
Coast Unified Air Quality Management
District (NCUAQMD) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). Under authority of the Clean Air
Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the
Act), we are approving local rules that
address particulate matter (PM–10)
emissions from general sources, fugitive
sources, and open burning and volatile
organic compound (VOC) emissions
from petroleum loading and storage.
DATES: This rule is effective on July 6,
2009 without further notice, unless EPA
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20877
receives adverse comments by June 5,
2009. If we receive such comment, we
will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public
that this rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number EPA–R09–
OAR–2008–0891, by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line
instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
www.regulations.gov is an ‘‘anonymous
access’’ system, and EPA will not know
your identity or contact information
unless you provide it in the body of
your comment. If you send e-mail
directly to EPA, your e-mail address
will be automatically captured and
included as part of the public comment.
If EPA cannot read your comment due
to technical difficulties and cannot
contact you for clarification, EPA may
not be able to consider your comment.
Docket: The index to the docket for
this action is available electronically at
www.regulations.gov and in hard copy
at EPA Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, California. While all
documents in the docket are listed in
the index, some information may be
publicly available only at the hard copy
location (e.g., copyrighted material), and
some may not be publicly available in
either location (e.g., CBI). To inspect the
hard copy materials, please schedule an
appointment during normal business
hours with the contact listed in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Alfred Petersen, EPA Region IX, (415)
947–4118, petersen.alfred@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM
06MYR1
20878
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
C. What are the purposes of the rule
revisions?
II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
C. EPA Recommendation to Further
Improve Rules
D. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
revised by the local air agency and
submitted by the California Air
Resources Board (CARB).
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rules we are
approving with the dates that they were
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULES
District
NCUAQMD
NCUAQMD
NCUAQMD
NCUAQMD
NCUAQMD
NCUAQMD
NCUAQMD
NCUAQMD
NCUAQMD
NCUAQMD
NCUAQMD
NCUAQMD
NCUAQMD
Rule No.
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
................................
104.2
104.3
104.4
104.10
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
On August 22, 2008, the submittal of
July 18, 2008 was found to meet the
completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51,
appendix V, which must be met before
formal EPA review.
B. Are there other versions of these
rules?
We approved the Rules 410 and 420
versions of NCUAQMD Rules 104.2 and
104.3 into the SIP on October 31, 1980
(45 FR 72147). We approved the Rules
430 and 482 versions of NCUAQMD
Rules 104.5 and 104.10 into the SIP on
August 2, 1978 (43 FR 33912).
We approved the Rules 2–100, 2–200,
2–300, 2–400, 2–500, versions of
NCUAQMD Rules 200 through 208 into
the SIP on January 29, 1985 (50 FR
3907). The Appendix A, Appendix B,
and Appendix C to the SIP rules were
approved on April 18, 1982 (47 FR
15784).
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
C. What are the purposes of the rule
revisions?
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires
states to submit regulations that control
volatile organic compounds, oxides of
nitrogen, particulate matter, and other
air pollutants which harm human health
and the environment. These rules were
developed as part of the local agency’s
program to control these pollutants.
The purpose of the amendment to
NCUAQMD Rule 104.2 is as follows:
• 104.2.3: A section is added to the
rule to prohibit a Kraft recovery furnace
from discharging into the atmosphere
gases with greater than 20% opacity,
except that this does not apply during
periods of start-up, shutdown, or
breakdown of a Kraft recovery furnace.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:14 May 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
Rule title
Revised
Visible Emissions ...........................................................................
Particulate Matter ..........................................................................
Fugitive Dist Emissions .................................................................
Petroleum Loading and Storage ...................................................
Effective Date and Definitions .......................................................
General Prohibitions and Exemptions for Selected Open Burning
Burn Hours and Notice of Ignition .................................................
General Burn Practices, Requirements, and Conditions ..............
Ignition Devices and Methods .......................................................
Certificates from Department of Fish and Game ..........................
Burning at Disposal Sites ..............................................................
Wildland Vegetation Management Burning ...................................
Burn Registration Program ............................................................
The purposes of amendments to
NCUAQMD Rule 104.3 are as follows:
• 104.3.4.1.2: A provision is added to
the rule to prohibit the emissions of
particulate matter from exceeding 0.025
grains per standard cubic foot of exhaust
gas from a new or modified Kraft
recovery furnace.
• 104.3.4.3.1: A provision is added to
the rule to prohibit the emissions of
particulate matter from exceeding 0.5
pounds per ton of Kraft pulp mill
production from any Kraft smelt
dissolving tank.
• 104.3.4.1.2: A provision is added to
the rule to prohibit the emissions of
particulate matter from exceeding 0.2
pounds per ton of black liquor solids
from a new or modified Kraft smelt
dissolving tank.
• 104.3.6: A formula is added to the
rule to calculate limits for particulate
emissions from geothermal wells.
The purpose of the amendment to
NCUAQMD Rule 104.4 is as follows:
• 104.4.1: The language of the
prohibition on handling materials with
unnecessary emission of particulates
was revised without any change in
meaning.
The purposes of the amendments to
NCUAQMD Rule 104.10 are as follows:
• 482.c.1 (SIP rule): The exemption
for stationary tanks installed prior to
December 31, 1970 is removed.
• 104.10.1: The reference to Federal
New Source Performance Standards
(NSPS) for all tanks in excess of 40,000
gallons is changed to Rule 104.11,
‘‘Federal New Source Performance
Standards.’’
The purposes of the amendments to
SIP NCUAQMD Rules 2–100, 2–200, 2–
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/19/08
05/15/08
05/17/07
05/15/08
05/15/08
05/15/08
07/18/03
12/16/04
05/15/08
05/15/08
Submitted
07/18/08
07/18/08
07/18/08
07/18/08
07/18/08
07/18/08
07/18/08
07/18/08
07/18/08
07/18/08
07/18/08
07/18/08
07/18/08
300, 2–400, 2–500, Appendix A,
Appendix B, and Appendix C are as
follows:
• These rules are completely revised
in numbering, content, and format to
become NCUAQMD Rules 200 through
208.
• 102.2.01 (SIP): The exemption for
an imminent fire hazard is removed.
• 102.5 (SIP): The exemption for fires
conducted in a mechanized burner is
removed.
• 200.2.0: Sixteen new definitions
were added to clarify new features in
the rule.
• 200.2.9: A limited exemption is
added for fire hazard reduction by
burning at multi-unit residential
facilities and commercial entities.
• 200.2.9: An exemption is added for
ceremonial fires.
• 201: Provisions are added to base a
Permissive-Burn Day decision on
meteorological conditions that will not
cause a violation of the National
Ambient Air Quality Standards or cause
excessive transport of pollutants. A
provision is added to the rules for a NoBurn Day for burn barrels if the risk of
a fire hazard is too great.
• 202: Revisions to burn hours and
the requirement to provide notice of
ignition are added.
• 203: Prohibitions on the use of burn
barrels are added in certain portions of
the District. Revisions to the rules
include drying requirements and the
arrangement of burnable waste.
• 204: Waste ignition requirements
are added to the rule.
• 205: Included is a revised
requirement for a certificate from the
California Fish and Game stating that
E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM
06MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
agricultural burning for the sole purpose
of habitat improvement is proper.
• 206: A prohibition is added for
burning rubbish or garbage at disposal
sites. An allowance is added for the
APCO to approve burning of natural
vegetation at disposal sites.
• 207: An expanded section for
Wildland Vegetation Management
Burning is provided that includes (a) a
burn plan, (b) an acreage limit per day,
and (c) an advance permissive-burn
notice.
• 208: A Burn Registration Program is
added for agricultural or prescribed
burning projects that includes (a) an
annual registration with the District of
planned burn projects, (b) a daily burn
authorization system operated by the
District, and (c) smoke management
planning that considers possible
remedial actions on various burning
contingencies listed in the rule.
II. EPA’s Evaluation and Action
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
Generally, SIP rules must be
enforceable (see section 110(a) of the
CAA), and must not relax existing
requirements (see sections 110(l) and
193). NCUAQMD is an attainment area
for PM–10 and for 8-hr ozone ambient
air quality standards.
Evaluation of the rules follows:
• NCUAQMD Rule 104.2: The rule
improves the SIP, because the rule
stringency is increased by adding an
opacity standard for emissions from a
Kraft recovery furnace. The rule is
enforceable and should be given full
approval.
• NCUAQMD Rule 104.3: The rule
improves the SIP, because four
provisions to limit particulate matter
emissions from Kraft process units and
recovery wells are added to the rule to
increase stringency. The rule is
enforceable and should be given full
approval.
• NCUAQMD Rule 104.4: The rule
improves the SIP by revising language to
improve clarity of requirements. The
rule is enforceable and should be given
full approval.
• NCUAQMD Rule 104.10: The rule
improves the SIP by removing the
exemption for tanks in excess of 40,000
gallons installed before December 31,
1970. The rule enforceability by EPA
may be limited, because federal NSPS
standards are referenced by NCUAQMD
Rule 104.11, ‘‘Federal NSPS,’’ which is
not in the SIP. References to rule
requirements should be in the SIP or in
publications available to the public.
This enforceablility issue also existed in
the current SIP rule approved by EPA.
Therefore, we will make a
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:14 May 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
recommendation for correction of the
enforceability issue in a future revision
of the rule, which should be given full
approval.
• NCUAQMD Rule 200–208: The
rules improve the SIP by adding various
requirements to increase the stringency
of the rules and by improving clarity.
The rules are enforceable and should be
given full approval.
Guidance and policy documents that
we used to help evaluate specific
enforceability requirements consistently
include the following:
1. Issues Relating to VOC Regulation
Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and Deviations,
EPA (May 25, 1988). [The Bluebook]
2. Guidance Document for Correcting
Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies, EPA Region 9 (August 21,
2001). [The Little Bluebook]
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation
criteria?
We believe that NCUAQMD Rules
104.2, 104.3, 104.4, 104.10, and 200
through 208 are consistent with the
relevant policy and guidance regarding
enforceability and SIP relaxations and
should be given full approval.
The TSD has more information on our
evaluation.
C. EPA Recommendation to Further
Improve Rules
A recommendation is made in the
TSD to improve NCUAQMD Rules 104.2
and 104.10 at the next rule revision
without affecting the current
approvability.
D. Public Comment and Final Action
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of
the CAA, EPA is fully approving
NCUAQMD Rules 104.2, 104.3, 104.4,
104.10, and 200 through 208 because we
believe they fulfill all relevant
requirements. We do not think anyone
will object to this approval, so we are
finalizing it without proposing it in
advance. However, in the Proposed
Rules section of this Federal Register,
we are simultaneously proposing
approval of the same submitted rules. If
we receive adverse comments by June 5,
2009, we will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register to
notify the public that the direct final
approval will not take effect and we will
address the comments in a subsequent
final action based on the proposal. If we
do not receive timely adverse
comments, the direct final approval will
be effective without further notice on
July 6, 2009. This will incorporate these
rules into the federally enforceable SIP.
Please note that if EPA receives
adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if
PO 00000
Frm 00013
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
20879
that provision may be severed from the
remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt
as final those provisions of the rule that
are not the subject of an adverse
comment.
III. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Pub. L. 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the national
government and the States, or on the
distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM
06MYR1
20880
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Dated: April 20, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides
that before a rule may take effect, the
agency promulgating the rule must
submit a rule report, which includes a
copy of the rule, to each House of the
Congress and to the Comptroller General
of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate,
the U.S. House of Representatives, and
the Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by July 6, 2009.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code
of Federal Regulations is amended as
follows:
■
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F—California
2. Section 52.220 is amended by
adding paragraphs (c)(359) to read as
follows:
■
§ 52.220
Identification of plan.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(359) New and amended regulations
were submitted on July 18, 2008, by the
Governor’s designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) North Coast Unified Air Quality
Management District.
(1) Rule 104.2, ‘‘Visible Emissions,’’
Rule 104.3, ‘‘Particulate Matter,’’ Rule
104.4, ‘‘Fugitive Dust Emissions,’’ and
Rule 104.10, ‘‘Petroleum Loading and
Storage,’’ originally adopted on
November 3, 1982 and revised on May
19, 2005.
(2) Rule 200, ‘‘Effective Date and
Definitions,’’ Rule 202, ‘‘Burn Hours
and Notice of Ignition,’’ Rule 203,
‘‘General Burn Practices, Requirements,
and Conditions,’’ Rule 204, ‘‘Ignition
Devices and Methods,’’ Rule 207,
‘‘Wildland Vegetation Management,’’
and Rule 208, ‘‘Burn Registration
Program,’’ originally adopted on July 18,
2003 and revised on May 15, 2005; Rule
201, ‘‘General Prohibitions and
Exemptions for Selected Open Burning’’
originally adopted on July 18, 2003 and
revised on May 17, 2007; Rule 205,
‘‘Certificates from Department of Fish
and Game,’’ adopted on July 18, 2003;
and Rule 206, ‘‘Burning at Disposal
Sites,’’ originally adopted on July 18,
2003 and revised on December 16, 2004.
[FR Doc. E9–10521 Filed 5–5–09; 8:45 am]
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations,
Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting
and recordkeeping requirements,
Volatile organic compounds.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:14 May 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00014
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2008–0839; FRL–8783–9]
Revisions to the California State
Implementation Plan, South Coast Air
Quality Management District
Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality
Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final
action to approve revisions to the South
Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) and Sacramento
Metropolitan Air Quality Management
District (SMAQMD) portion of the
California State Implementation Plan
(SIP). These revisions concern oxides of
nitrogen (NOx) emissions from boilers,
process heaters, steam generators and
residential water heaters. We are
approving local rules that regulate these
emission sources under the Clean Air
Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the
Act).
DATES: This rule is effective on July 6,
2009 without further notice, unless EPA
receives adverse comments by June 5,
2009. If we receive such comments, we
will publish a timely withdrawal in the
Federal Register to notify the public
that this direct final rule will not take
effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments,
identified by docket number [EPA–R09–
OAR–2008–0839], by one of the
following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
on-line instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel
(Air-4), U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street,
San Francisco, CA 94105–3901.
Instructions: All comments will be
included in the public docket without
change and may be made available
online at https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information
provided, unless the comment includes
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Information that
you consider CBI or otherwise protected
should be clearly identified as such and
should not be submitted through
https://www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
https://www.regulations.gov is an
‘‘anonymous access’’ system, and EPA
will not know your identity or contact
information unless you provide it in the
E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM
06MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 6, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20877-20880]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10521]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA-R09-OAR-2008-0891, FRL-8782-7]
Revisions to the California State Implementation Plan, North
Coast Unified Air Quality Management District
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the
North Coast Unified Air Quality Management District (NCUAQMD) portion
of the California State Implementation Plan (SIP). Under authority of
the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act), we are approving
local rules that address particulate matter (PM-10) emissions from
general sources, fugitive sources, and open burning and volatile
organic compound (VOC) emissions from petroleum loading and storage.
DATES: This rule is effective on July 6, 2009 without further notice,
unless EPA receives adverse comments by June 5, 2009. If we receive
such comment, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal
Register to notify the public that this rule will not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by docket number EPA-R09-OAR-
2008-0891, by one of the following methods:
1. Federal eRulemaking Portal: www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-
line instructions.
2. E-mail: steckel.andrew@epa.gov.
3. Mail or deliver: Andrew Steckel (Air-4), U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency Region IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, CA
94105-3901.
Instructions: All comments will be included in the public docket
without change and may be made available online at www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided, unless the comment
includes Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information
whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Information that you
consider CBI or otherwise protected should be clearly identified as
such and should not be submitted through www.regulations.gov or e-mail.
www.regulations.gov is an ``anonymous access'' system, and EPA will not
know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the
body of your comment. If you send e-mail directly to EPA, your e-mail
address will be automatically captured and included as part of the
public comment. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical
difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be
able to consider your comment.
Docket: The index to the docket for this action is available
electronically at www.regulations.gov and in hard copy at EPA Region
IX, 75 Hawthorne Street, San Francisco, California. While all documents
in the docket are listed in the index, some information may be publicly
available only at the hard copy location (e.g., copyrighted material),
and some may not be publicly available in either location (e.g., CBI).
To inspect the hard copy materials, please schedule an appointment
during normal business hours with the contact listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alfred Petersen, EPA Region IX, (415)
947-4118, petersen.alfred@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document, ``we,'' ``us'' and
``our'' refer to EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
[[Page 20878]]
C. What are the purposes of the rule revisions?
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
C. EPA Recommendation to Further Improve Rules
D. Public Comment and Final Action
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State's Submittal
A. What rules did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rules we are approving with the dates that they
were revised by the local air agency and submitted by the California
Air Resources Board (CARB).
Table 1--Submitted Rules
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
District Rule No. Rule title Revised Submitted
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
NCUAQMD................................ 104.2 Visible Emissions.............. 05/19/08 07/18/08
NCUAQMD................................ 104.3 Particulate Matter............. 05/19/08 07/18/08
NCUAQMD................................ 104.4 Fugitive Dist Emissions........ 05/19/08 07/18/08
NCUAQMD................................ 104.10 Petroleum Loading and Storage.. 05/19/08 07/18/08
NCUAQMD................................ 200 Effective Date and Definitions. 05/15/08 07/18/08
NCUAQMD................................ 201 General Prohibitions and 05/17/07 07/18/08
Exemptions for Selected Open
Burning.
NCUAQMD................................ 202 Burn Hours and Notice of 05/15/08 07/18/08
Ignition.
NCUAQMD................................ 203 General Burn Practices, 05/15/08 07/18/08
Requirements, and Conditions.
NCUAQMD................................ 204 Ignition Devices and Methods... 05/15/08 07/18/08
NCUAQMD................................ 205 Certificates from Department of 07/18/03 07/18/08
Fish and Game.
NCUAQMD................................ 206 Burning at Disposal Sites...... 12/16/04 07/18/08
NCUAQMD................................ 207 Wildland Vegetation Management 05/15/08 07/18/08
Burning.
NCUAQMD................................ 208 Burn Registration Program...... 05/15/08 07/18/08
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
On August 22, 2008, the submittal of July 18, 2008 was found to
meet the completeness criteria in 40 CFR part 51, appendix V, which
must be met before formal EPA review.
B. Are there other versions of these rules?
We approved the Rules 410 and 420 versions of NCUAQMD Rules 104.2
and 104.3 into the SIP on October 31, 1980 (45 FR 72147). We approved
the Rules 430 and 482 versions of NCUAQMD Rules 104.5 and 104.10 into
the SIP on August 2, 1978 (43 FR 33912).
We approved the Rules 2-100, 2-200, 2-300, 2-400, 2-500, versions
of NCUAQMD Rules 200 through 208 into the SIP on January 29, 1985 (50
FR 3907). The Appendix A, Appendix B, and Appendix C to the SIP rules
were approved on April 18, 1982 (47 FR 15784).
C. What are the purposes of the rule revisions?
Section 110(a) of the CAA requires states to submit regulations
that control volatile organic compounds, oxides of nitrogen,
particulate matter, and other air pollutants which harm human health
and the environment. These rules were developed as part of the local
agency's program to control these pollutants.
The purpose of the amendment to NCUAQMD Rule 104.2 is as follows:
104.2.3: A section is added to the rule to prohibit a
Kraft recovery furnace from discharging into the atmosphere gases with
greater than 20% opacity, except that this does not apply during
periods of start-up, shutdown, or breakdown of a Kraft recovery
furnace.
The purposes of amendments to NCUAQMD Rule 104.3 are as follows:
104.3.4.1.2: A provision is added to the rule to prohibit
the emissions of particulate matter from exceeding 0.025 grains per
standard cubic foot of exhaust gas from a new or modified Kraft
recovery furnace.
104.3.4.3.1: A provision is added to the rule to prohibit
the emissions of particulate matter from exceeding 0.5 pounds per ton
of Kraft pulp mill production from any Kraft smelt dissolving tank.
104.3.4.1.2: A provision is added to the rule to prohibit
the emissions of particulate matter from exceeding 0.2 pounds per ton
of black liquor solids from a new or modified Kraft smelt dissolving
tank.
104.3.6: A formula is added to the rule to calculate
limits for particulate emissions from geothermal wells.
The purpose of the amendment to NCUAQMD Rule 104.4 is as follows:
104.4.1: The language of the prohibition on handling
materials with unnecessary emission of particulates was revised without
any change in meaning.
The purposes of the amendments to NCUAQMD Rule 104.10 are as
follows:
482.c.1 (SIP rule): The exemption for stationary tanks
installed prior to December 31, 1970 is removed.
104.10.1: The reference to Federal New Source Performance
Standards (NSPS) for all tanks in excess of 40,000 gallons is changed
to Rule 104.11, ``Federal New Source Performance Standards.''
The purposes of the amendments to SIP NCUAQMD Rules 2-100, 2-200,
2-300, 2-400, 2-500, Appendix A, Appendix B, and Appendix C are as
follows:
These rules are completely revised in numbering, content,
and format to become NCUAQMD Rules 200 through 208.
102.2.01 (SIP): The exemption for an imminent fire hazard
is removed.
102.5 (SIP): The exemption for fires conducted in a
mechanized burner is removed.
200.2.0: Sixteen new definitions were added to clarify new
features in the rule.
200.2.9: A limited exemption is added for fire hazard
reduction by burning at multi-unit residential facilities and
commercial entities.
200.2.9: An exemption is added for ceremonial fires.
201: Provisions are added to base a Permissive-Burn Day
decision on meteorological conditions that will not cause a violation
of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards or cause excessive
transport of pollutants. A provision is added to the rules for a No-
Burn Day for burn barrels if the risk of a fire hazard is too great.
202: Revisions to burn hours and the requirement to
provide notice of ignition are added.
203: Prohibitions on the use of burn barrels are added in
certain portions of the District. Revisions to the rules include drying
requirements and the arrangement of burnable waste.
204: Waste ignition requirements are added to the rule.
205: Included is a revised requirement for a certificate
from the California Fish and Game stating that
[[Page 20879]]
agricultural burning for the sole purpose of habitat improvement is
proper.
206: A prohibition is added for burning rubbish or garbage
at disposal sites. An allowance is added for the APCO to approve
burning of natural vegetation at disposal sites.
207: An expanded section for Wildland Vegetation
Management Burning is provided that includes (a) a burn plan, (b) an
acreage limit per day, and (c) an advance permissive-burn notice.
208: A Burn Registration Program is added for agricultural
or prescribed burning projects that includes (a) an annual registration
with the District of planned burn projects, (b) a daily burn
authorization system operated by the District, and (c) smoke management
planning that considers possible remedial actions on various burning
contingencies listed in the rule.
II. EPA's Evaluation and Action
A. How is EPA evaluating the rules?
Generally, SIP rules must be enforceable (see section 110(a) of the
CAA), and must not relax existing requirements (see sections 110(l) and
193). NCUAQMD is an attainment area for PM-10 and for 8-hr ozone
ambient air quality standards.
Evaluation of the rules follows:
NCUAQMD Rule 104.2: The rule improves the SIP, because the
rule stringency is increased by adding an opacity standard for
emissions from a Kraft recovery furnace. The rule is enforceable and
should be given full approval.
NCUAQMD Rule 104.3: The rule improves the SIP, because
four provisions to limit particulate matter emissions from Kraft
process units and recovery wells are added to the rule to increase
stringency. The rule is enforceable and should be given full approval.
NCUAQMD Rule 104.4: The rule improves the SIP by revising
language to improve clarity of requirements. The rule is enforceable
and should be given full approval.
NCUAQMD Rule 104.10: The rule improves the SIP by removing
the exemption for tanks in excess of 40,000 gallons installed before
December 31, 1970. The rule enforceability by EPA may be limited,
because federal NSPS standards are referenced by NCUAQMD Rule 104.11,
``Federal NSPS,'' which is not in the SIP. References to rule
requirements should be in the SIP or in publications available to the
public. This enforceablility issue also existed in the current SIP rule
approved by EPA. Therefore, we will make a recommendation for
correction of the enforceability issue in a future revision of the
rule, which should be given full approval.
NCUAQMD Rule 200-208: The rules improve the SIP by adding
various requirements to increase the stringency of the rules and by
improving clarity. The rules are enforceable and should be given full
approval.
Guidance and policy documents that we used to help evaluate
specific enforceability requirements consistently include the
following:
1. Issues Relating to VOC Regulation Cutpoints, Deficiencies, and
Deviations, EPA (May 25, 1988). [The Bluebook]
2. Guidance Document for Correcting Common VOC & Other Rule
Deficiencies, EPA Region 9 (August 21, 2001). [The Little Bluebook]
B. Do the rules meet the evaluation criteria?
We believe that NCUAQMD Rules 104.2, 104.3, 104.4, 104.10, and 200
through 208 are consistent with the relevant policy and guidance
regarding enforceability and SIP relaxations and should be given full
approval.
The TSD has more information on our evaluation.
C. EPA Recommendation to Further Improve Rules
A recommendation is made in the TSD to improve NCUAQMD Rules 104.2
and 104.10 at the next rule revision without affecting the current
approvability.
D. Public Comment and Final Action
As authorized in section 110(k)(3) of the CAA, EPA is fully
approving NCUAQMD Rules 104.2, 104.3, 104.4, 104.10, and 200 through
208 because we believe they fulfill all relevant requirements. We do
not think anyone will object to this approval, so we are finalizing it
without proposing it in advance. However, in the Proposed Rules section
of this Federal Register, we are simultaneously proposing approval of
the same submitted rules. If we receive adverse comments by June 5,
2009, we will publish a timely withdrawal in the Federal Register to
notify the public that the direct final approval will not take effect
and we will address the comments in a subsequent final action based on
the proposal. If we do not receive timely adverse comments, the direct
final approval will be effective without further notice on July 6,
2009. This will incorporate these rules into the federally enforceable
SIP.
Please note that if EPA receives adverse comment on an amendment,
paragraph, or section of this rule and if that provision may be severed
from the remainder of the rule, EPA may adopt as final those provisions
of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have Federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the national government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
[[Page 20880]]
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the
Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally
provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating
the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule,
to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report containing this rule and other
required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of
Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior
to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot
take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal
Register. This action is not a ``major rule'' as defined by 5 U.S.C.
804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by July 6, 2009. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by
reference, Intergovernmental relations, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: April 20, 2009.
Laura Yoshii,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region IX.
0
Part 52, chapter I, title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations is
amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart F--California
0
2. Section 52.220 is amended by adding paragraphs (c)(359) to read as
follows:
Sec. 52.220 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(359) New and amended regulations were submitted on July 18, 2008,
by the Governor's designee.
(i) Incorporation by reference.
(A) North Coast Unified Air Quality Management District.
(1) Rule 104.2, ``Visible Emissions,'' Rule 104.3, ``Particulate
Matter,'' Rule 104.4, ``Fugitive Dust Emissions,'' and Rule 104.10,
``Petroleum Loading and Storage,'' originally adopted on November 3,
1982 and revised on May 19, 2005.
(2) Rule 200, ``Effective Date and Definitions,'' Rule 202, ``Burn
Hours and Notice of Ignition,'' Rule 203, ``General Burn Practices,
Requirements, and Conditions,'' Rule 204, ``Ignition Devices and
Methods,'' Rule 207, ``Wildland Vegetation Management,'' and Rule 208,
``Burn Registration Program,'' originally adopted on July 18, 2003 and
revised on May 15, 2005; Rule 201, ``General Prohibitions and
Exemptions for Selected Open Burning'' originally adopted on July 18,
2003 and revised on May 17, 2007; Rule 205, ``Certificates from
Department of Fish and Game,'' adopted on July 18, 2003; and Rule 206,
``Burning at Disposal Sites,'' originally adopted on July 18, 2003 and
revised on December 16, 2004.
[FR Doc. E9-10521 Filed 5-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P