Removal of T 37 Jet Trainer Aircraft and Parts From the Commerce Control List, 20870-20871 [E9-10468]
Download as PDF
20870
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
Area 531), thus the associated
controlled airspace is being modified to
incorporate the portion of the final that
is affected. Controlled airspace
extending upward from the surface of
the Earth is required to encompass the
airspace necessary for instrument
approaches for aircraft operating under
Instrument Flight Rules (IFR).
Designations for Class D and E airspace
areas extending upward from the
surface of the Earth are published in
FAA Order 7400.9S, signed October 3,
2008, and effective October 31, 2008,
which is incorporated by reference in 14
CFR part 71.1. The Class D and E
designations listed in this document
will be published subsequently in the
Order.
Agency Findings
The regulations adopted herein will
not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the
national government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among various levels of
government. Therefore, it is determined
that this final rule does not have
federalism implications under Executive
Order 13132.
The FAA has determined that this
regulation only involves an established
body of technical regulations for which
frequent and routine amendments are
necessary to keep them operationally
current, is non-controversial and
unlikely to result in adverse or negative
comments. It, therefore, (1) is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
Executive Order 12866; (2) is not a
‘‘significant rule’’ under DOT
Regulatory Policies and Procedures (44
FR 11034; February 26, 1979); and (3)
does not warrant preparation of a
Regulatory Evaluation as the anticipated
impact is so minimal. Since this is a
routine matter that will only affect air
traffic procedures and air navigation, it
is certified that this rule, when
promulgated, will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities under the
criteria of the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
The FAA’s authority to issue rules
regarding aviation safety is found in
Title 49 of the United States Code.
Subtitle I, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority.
This rulemaking is promulgated
under the authority described in
Subtitle VII, Part A, Subpart I, Section
40103. Under that section, the FAA is
charged with prescribing regulations to
assign the use of airspace necessary to
ensure the safety of aircraft and the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:14 May 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
efficient use of airspace. This regulation
is within the scope of that authority as
it modifies controlled airspace at
Albemarle, NC.
Lists of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (Air).
Issued in College Park, Georgia, on March
19, 2009.
Barry A. Knight,
Acting Manager, Operations Support Group,
Eastern Service Center, Air Traffic
Organization.
[FR Doc. E9–10397 Filed 5–5–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–P
Adoption of the Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
amends 14 CFR Part 71 as follows:
■
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Part 774
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D AND E AIRSPACE AREAS; AIR
TRAFFIC SERVICE ROUTES; AND
REPORTING POINTS
[Docket No. 090406632–9631–01]
RIN 0694–AC74
■
Removal of T 37 Jet Trainer Aircraft
and Parts From the Commerce Control
List
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and
Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
§ 71.1
SUMMARY: This rule removes the T 37 jet
trainer aircraft and specially designed
component parts from under the
Department of Commerce’s licensing
jurisdiction on the Commerce Control
List (CCL). T 37 jet trainer aircraft
appear on the CCL administered by the
Department of Commerce, Bureau of
Industry and Security (BIS). However,
the Department of State, Directorate of
Defense Trade Controls (DDTC) reviews
license applications for these aircraft
and parts. BIS is removing these aircraft
and parts from the CCL to avoid
potentially overlapping coverage and
reduce the possibility of confusion by
the public.
DATES: This rule is effective: May 6,
2009.
1. The authority citation for Part 71
continues to read as follows:
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9S, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
signed October 3, 2008, effective
October 31, 2008, is amended as
follows:
■
Paragraph 5000
Class D Airspace.
*
*
*
ASO NC D
*
*
Albemarle, NC [REVISED]
Stanly County Airport, NC
(Lat. 35°25′0.101″ N., long 80°09′03″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from the
surface to and including 3,100 feet MSL
within a 5.8-mile radius of Stanly County
Airport and within 1.5 miles each side of the
043 degree bearing from Stanly County
Airport to 7.8 miles Northeast. This Class D
airspace area is effective during the specific
dates and times established in advance by a
Notice to Airmen. The effective date and time
will thereafter be continuously published in
the Airport/Facility Directory.
*
*
*
*
*
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace Areas
Extending Upward from 700 feet or More
Above the Surface of the Earth.
*
*
*
ASO NC E5
*
*
Albemarle, NC [REVISED]
Stanly County Airport, NC
(Lat. 35°25′0.101″ N., long 80°09′03″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within an 8-mile radius
of Stanly County Airport.
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00004
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gene Christiansen in the Office of
National Security and Technology
Transfer Controls, Bureau of Industry
and Security, U.S. Department of
Commerce at (202) 482–2984.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Both DDTC and BIS exercise licensing
jurisdiction over certain exports and
reexports. The policy for designating an
item as being subject to the International
Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22
CFR parts 120–130) and, therefore,
subject to DDTC licensing jurisdiction is
described in 22 CFR 120.3. Generally,
that policy is to apply DDTC licensing
jurisdiction to items that are specifically
designed, developed, configured,
adapted or modified for a military
application. Items not subject to DDTC
E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM
06MYR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 86 / Wednesday, May 6, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
3. This rule does not contain policies
with Federalism implications as that
term is defined under E.O. 13132.
4. The provisions of the
Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) requiring notice of proposed
rulemaking, the opportunity for public
participation, and a delay in effective
date, are inapplicable because this
regulation involves a military and
foreign affairs function of the United
States (5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). Further, no
other law requires that a notice of
proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment be
given for this final rule. Because a
notice of proposed rulemaking and an
opportunity for public comment are not
required to be given for this rule under
the Administrative Procedure Act or by
any other law, the analytical
requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are
not applicable. Therefore, this
regulation is issued in final form.
Although there is no formal comment
period, public comments on this
regulation are welcome on a continuing
basis. Comments should be submitted to
William Arvin, Office of Exporter
Services, Bureau of Industry and
Security, Department of Commerce,
Room H2705, Washington, DC 20230.
Rulemaking Requirements
rwilkins on PROD1PC63 with RULES
licensing jurisdiction or to the exclusive
licensing jurisdiction of another
government agency are subject to the
Export Administration Regulations
(EAR) and BIS’s licensing jurisdiction.
The T 37 jet trainer was designed as
a military trainer aircraft. Such aircraft
are subject to the ITAR unless excluded
under the provisions of 22 CFR 121.3(b),
which relate to the engine type and
power of the trainer aircraft. The T 37
and its specially designed component
parts do not meet the terms of that
exclusion. However, the T 37 jet trainer
aircraft and their specially designed
component parts have been listed on the
CCL (found in 15 CFR Part 774, Supp.
No. 1) since at least 1993. As such,
under a strict interpretation of ITAR and
the CCL as currently drafted, the T 37
jet trainer aircraft could fall within the
jurisdiction of both DDTC and BIS,
potentially causing members of the
public to conclude incorrectly that an
export license is required from both
agencies for this item. By removing T 37
jet trainer aircraft from the CCL, this
rule clarifies that export licenses should
not be obtained from BIS, avoids
potentially overlapping coverage and
reduces the possibility of confusion on
the part of the public. Export and
reexport license applications for the T
37 jet trainer aircraft and parts should
be directed to DDTC.
■
1. This rule has been determined to be
not significant for purposes of E.O.
12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other
provision of law, no person is required
to respond to, nor is subject to a penalty
for failure to comply with, a collection
of information, subject to the
requirements of the Paperwork
Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501
et seq.) (PRA), unless that collection of
information displays a currently valid
Office of Management and Budget
(OMB) Control Number. This regulation
involves a collection previously
approved by the OMB under control
number 0694–0088, ‘‘Multi-Purpose
Application,’’ which carries a burden
hour estimate of 58 minutes to prepare
and submit form BIS–748.
Miscellaneous and recordkeeping
activities account for 12 minutes per
submission. BIS believes that this rule
will have no impact on the burden
associated with that collection because
the Department of State exercises
licensing jurisdiction over the aircraft or
parts affected by this rule and BIS has
not issued a license for them in recent
years.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:14 May 05, 2009
Jkt 217001
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 774
Exports, Foreign trade.
Accordingly, part 774 of the Export
Administration Regulations (15 CFR
parts 730 through 774) is amended as
follows:
PART 774—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR
part 774 continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50
U.S.C. 1701 et seq.; 10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C.
7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c, 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq., 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u);
42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42 U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C.
1354; 46 U.S.C. app. 466c; 50 U.S.C. app. 5;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O.
13026, 61 FR 58767, 3 CFR, 1996 Comp., p.
228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001
Comp., p. 783; Notice of July 23, 2008, 73 FR
43603 (July 25, 2008).
2. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774,
Category 9—Propulsion Systems, Space
Vehicles and Related Equipment, Export
Control Classification Number 9A018,
revise paragraph a. of the Items
paragraph of the List of Items Controlled
section to read as follows:
■
Items: a. Military trainer aircraft bearing
‘‘T’’ designations:
a.1. Using reciprocating engines; or
a.2. Turbo prop engines with less than 600
horse power (h.p.); and
a.3. Specially designed component parts.
*
*
*
*
*
*
Frm 00005
Fmt 4700
AGENCY FOR INTERNATIONAL
DEVELOPMENT
22 CFR Part 215
RIN 0412–AA61
Privacy Act of 1974, Implementation of
Exemptions
AGENCY: United States Agency for
International Development.
ACTION:
Final rule; delay effective date.
SUMMARY: This document delays the
effective date by 90 days for the final
rule exempting portions of the Partner
Vetting System from one or more
provisions of the Privacy Act, as
published in the Federal Register on
January 2, 2009 and delayed on
February 2, 2009, and on April 2, 2009.
DATES: The effective date for the final
rule published on January 2, 2009 (74
FR 9) and delayed on February 2, 2009
(74 FR 5808), and on April 2, 2009 (74
FR 14931) is further delayed until
August 4, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general questions, please contact Jeff
Denale, Chief, Counterterrorism and
Information Security Division, Office of
Security, United States Agency for
International Development, Ronald
Reagan Building, 1300 Pennsylvania
Avenue, NW., Washington, DC 20523,
or by phone on (202) 712–1264.
Dated: May 4, 2009.
Mark Webb,
Acting Director, Office of Security.
[FR Doc. E9–10531 Filed 5–4–09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE P
*
Sfmt 4700
*
BILLING CODE 3510–33–P
List of Items Controlled
* * *
PO 00000
*
Dated: April 29, 2009.
Matthew S. Borman,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Export
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–10468 Filed 5–5–09; 8:45 am]
9A018 Equipment on the Wassenaar
Arrangement Munitions List
*
20871
E:\FR\FM\06MYR1.SGM
06MYR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 86 (Wednesday, May 6, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 20870-20871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10468]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
Bureau of Industry and Security
15 CFR Part 774
[Docket No. 090406632-9631-01]
RIN 0694-AC74
Removal of T 37 Jet Trainer Aircraft and Parts From the Commerce
Control List
AGENCY: Bureau of Industry and Security, Commerce.
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This rule removes the T 37 jet trainer aircraft and specially
designed component parts from under the Department of Commerce's
licensing jurisdiction on the Commerce Control List (CCL). T 37 jet
trainer aircraft appear on the CCL administered by the Department of
Commerce, Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). However, the
Department of State, Directorate of Defense Trade Controls (DDTC)
reviews license applications for these aircraft and parts. BIS is
removing these aircraft and parts from the CCL to avoid potentially
overlapping coverage and reduce the possibility of confusion by the
public.
DATES: This rule is effective: May 6, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gene Christiansen in the Office of
National Security and Technology Transfer Controls, Bureau of Industry
and Security, U.S. Department of Commerce at (202) 482-2984.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Both DDTC and BIS exercise licensing jurisdiction over certain
exports and reexports. The policy for designating an item as being
subject to the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR
parts 120-130) and, therefore, subject to DDTC licensing jurisdiction
is described in 22 CFR 120.3. Generally, that policy is to apply DDTC
licensing jurisdiction to items that are specifically designed,
developed, configured, adapted or modified for a military application.
Items not subject to DDTC
[[Page 20871]]
licensing jurisdiction or to the exclusive licensing jurisdiction of
another government agency are subject to the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR) and BIS's licensing jurisdiction.
The T 37 jet trainer was designed as a military trainer aircraft.
Such aircraft are subject to the ITAR unless excluded under the
provisions of 22 CFR 121.3(b), which relate to the engine type and
power of the trainer aircraft. The T 37 and its specially designed
component parts do not meet the terms of that exclusion. However, the T
37 jet trainer aircraft and their specially designed component parts
have been listed on the CCL (found in 15 CFR Part 774, Supp. No. 1)
since at least 1993. As such, under a strict interpretation of ITAR and
the CCL as currently drafted, the T 37 jet trainer aircraft could fall
within the jurisdiction of both DDTC and BIS, potentially causing
members of the public to conclude incorrectly that an export license is
required from both agencies for this item. By removing T 37 jet trainer
aircraft from the CCL, this rule clarifies that export licenses should
not be obtained from BIS, avoids potentially overlapping coverage and
reduces the possibility of confusion on the part of the public. Export
and reexport license applications for the T 37 jet trainer aircraft and
parts should be directed to DDTC.
Rulemaking Requirements
1. This rule has been determined to be not significant for purposes
of E.O. 12866.
2. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person is
required to respond to, nor is subject to a penalty for failure to
comply with, a collection of information, subject to the requirements
of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.) (PRA),
unless that collection of information displays a currently valid Office
of Management and Budget (OMB) Control Number. This regulation involves
a collection previously approved by the OMB under control number 0694-
0088, ``Multi-Purpose Application,'' which carries a burden hour
estimate of 58 minutes to prepare and submit form BIS-748.
Miscellaneous and recordkeeping activities account for 12 minutes per
submission. BIS believes that this rule will have no impact on the
burden associated with that collection because the Department of State
exercises licensing jurisdiction over the aircraft or parts affected by
this rule and BIS has not issued a license for them in recent years.
3. This rule does not contain policies with Federalism implications
as that term is defined under E.O. 13132.
4. The provisions of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C.
553) requiring notice of proposed rulemaking, the opportunity for
public participation, and a delay in effective date, are inapplicable
because this regulation involves a military and foreign affairs
function of the United States (5 U.S.C. 553(a)(1)). Further, no other
law requires that a notice of proposed rulemaking and an opportunity
for public comment be given for this final rule. Because a notice of
proposed rulemaking and an opportunity for public comment are not
required to be given for this rule under the Administrative Procedure
Act or by any other law, the analytical requirements of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) are not applicable. Therefore,
this regulation is issued in final form. Although there is no formal
comment period, public comments on this regulation are welcome on a
continuing basis. Comments should be submitted to William Arvin, Office
of Exporter Services, Bureau of Industry and Security, Department of
Commerce, Room H2705, Washington, DC 20230.
List of Subjects in 15 CFR Part 774
Exports, Foreign trade.
0
Accordingly, part 774 of the Export Administration Regulations (15 CFR
parts 730 through 774) is amended as follows:
PART 774--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for 15 CFR part 774 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 50 U.S.C. app. 2401 et seq.; 50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.;
10 U.S.C. 7420; 10 U.S.C. 7430(e); 22 U.S.C. 287c, 22 U.S.C. 3201 et
seq., 22 U.S.C. 6004; 30 U.S.C. 185(s), 185(u); 42 U.S.C. 2139a; 42
U.S.C. 6212; 43 U.S.C. 1354; 46 U.S.C. app. 466c; 50 U.S.C. app. 5;
22 U.S.C. 7201 et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 7210; E.O. 13026, 61 FR 58767, 3
CFR, 1996 Comp., p. 228; E.O. 13222, 66 FR 44025, 3 CFR, 2001 Comp.,
p. 783; Notice of July 23, 2008, 73 FR 43603 (July 25, 2008).
0
2. In Supplement No. 1 to Part 774, Category 9--Propulsion Systems,
Space Vehicles and Related Equipment, Export Control Classification
Number 9A018, revise paragraph a. of the Items paragraph of the List of
Items Controlled section to read as follows:
9A018 Equipment on the Wassenaar Arrangement Munitions List
* * * * *
List of Items Controlled
* * *
Items: a. Military trainer aircraft bearing ``T'' designations:
a.1. Using reciprocating engines; or
a.2. Turbo prop engines with less than 600 horse power (h.p.);
and
a.3. Specially designed component parts.
* * * * *
Dated: April 29, 2009.
Matthew S. Borman,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-10468 Filed 5-5-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-33-P