Field Office Relocation, 20726-20727 [E9-10301]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
20726
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 5, 2009 / Notices
Activity/operator
Location
Shell Offshore, Inc., Initial Exploration Plan, SEA N–9317 ........
DeSoto Canyon, Block 939, Lease OCS–G 31591, located
133 miles from the nearest Louisiana shoreline, 173 miles
from the nearest Mississippi shoreline, 154 miles from the
nearest Alabama shoreline and 155 miles from the nearest
Florida shoreline.
Vermilion, Block 222, Lease OCS–G 02865, located 7 miles
from the nearest Louisiana shoreline.
Eugene Island, Block 256, Lease OCS–G 02102, located 53
miles from the nearest Louisiana shoreline.
South Marsh Island, Block 28, Lease OCS–G 09536, located
50 miles from the nearest Louisiana shoreline.
South Marsh Island, Block 123, Lease OCS–G 23845, located
31 miles from the nearest Louisiana shoreline.
Energy Resource Technology GOM, Inc., Structure Removal,
SEA ES/SR 09–020.
Energy XXI GOM, LLC, Structure Removal, SEA ES/SR 09–
023.
W & T Offshore, Inc., Structure Removal, SEA ES/SR 09–033
Energy Resource Technology GOM, Inc., Permit to Modify to
Remove Well 001 Using Explosive Severance Methods,
SEA ES/SR APM SM123–001.
McMoran Oil & Gas, LLC, Structure Removal, SEA ES/SR 09–
038.
Persons interested in reviewing
environmental documents for the
proposals listed above or obtaining
information about SEAs and FONSIs
prepared by the Gulf of Mexico OCS
Region are encouraged to contact MMS
at the address or telephone listed in the
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION section.
Dated: April 13, 2009.
Lars Herbst,
Regional Director, Gulf of Mexico OCS Region.
[FR Doc. E9–10293 Filed 5–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–MR–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R8–ES–2009–N0085; 1112–0000–
80221–F2]
Tehachapi Uplands Multiple Species
Habitat Conservation Plan, Kern
County, CA
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of extension of the public
comment period for the draft
environmental impact statement and
draft habitat conservation plan in
support of an incidental take permit
application.
SUMMARY: We the U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service (Service), advise the public that
we are extending the public comment
period for the Tejon Ranchcorp’s
incidental take application (ITP), draft
Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS),
and draft Tehachapi Uplands Multiple
Species Habitat Conservation Plan
(TUMSHCP). See SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION for details.
DATES: Submit comments on these
documents on or before July 7, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Kirkland, U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service, at 805–644–1766 extension 267.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
23:12 May 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
Ship Shoal, Block 139, Lease OCS–G 21115, located 21
miles from the nearest Louisiana shoreline.
We are
extending the public comment period
on the ITP application, DEIS, and
TUMSHCP (74 FR 6050, February 4,
2009), in response to requests from the
public for a 60-day extension, in order
to allow additional time for document
review. This extension also will provide
the public and Federal, State, Tribal,
and local agencies with an additional
opportunity to submit information and
comments on these draft documents.
Before including your address, phone
number, e-mail address, or other
personal identifying information in your
comment, you should be aware that
your entire comment—including your
personal identifying information—may
be made publicly available at any time.
While you may ask us in your comment
to withhold your personal identifying
information from public review, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so.
If you previously submitted
comments, you need not resubmit them;
we have already incorporated them into
the public record and will fully consider
them in finalizing these documents.
For background and more information
on the applicant’s proposed action, as
well as how to review the ITP
application, draft TUMSHCP, and draft
EIS and submit comments or
information, see our February 4, 2009,
notice (74 FR 6050). Please refer to TE–
204887–0 when requesting documents
or submitting comments.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Authority
We provide this notice under section
10(c) of the Endangered Species Act (16
U.S.C. 1531 et seq.) and its
implementing regulations (50 CFR
17.22) and the National Environmental
Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4371 et seq.) and
its implementing regulations (40 CFR
1506.6).
PO 00000
Frm 00056
Date
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
3/17/2009
3/17/2009
3/19/2009
3/24/2009
3/25/2009
3/31/2009
Dated: April 29, 2009.
Margaret Kolar,
Acting Deputy Regional Director, Pacific
Southwest Nevada Region, Sacramento,
California.
[FR Doc. E9–10286 Filed 5–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510–55–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[FBMS Charge Code L07770000.XG0000]
Field Office Relocation
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Relocation and Name
Change of the Bureau of Land
Management’s Folsom Office in Folsom,
CA.
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that
the Bureau of Land Management’s
(BLM) Folsom Field Office is moving
from its current location at 63 Natoma
St., Folsom, CA to a new building
located at 5152 Hillsdale Circle, El
Dorado Hills, CA 95762. The office
name will be the Mother Lode Field
Office effective with the move. The BLM
will move the weeks of May 4 and 11
and resume full operations at the new
office on Monday, May 18, 2009, at 7
a.m.
The BLM encourages the public to
arrange any work with BLM before May
1. The new telephone number is: (916)
941–3101 and is scheduled to be on line
by May 18.
Directions to the new BLM office:
from Highway 50 eastbound, take the
Latrobe Road exit. Go 2.4 miles and turn
right on Investment Boulevard. Go 0.1
miles and turn right on Robert J.
Matthews Parkway. Go 0.1 mile and
turn left on Hillsdale Circle. The office
is on the left in 0.2 mile. The new
address is: Bureau of Land Management,
Mother Lode Field Office, 5152
E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM
05MYN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 85 / Tuesday, May 5, 2009 / Notices
Hillsdale Circle, El Dorado Hills, CA
95762.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
BLM Folsom Field Office at (916) 985–
4474.
Dated: April 3, 2009.
William S. Haigh,
Field Office Manager.
[FR Doc. E9–10301 Filed 5–4–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Drug Enforcement Administration
[Docket No. 07–24]
Patrick W. Stodola, M.D.; Revocation of
Registration
On February 7, 2007, the Deputy
Assistant Administrator, Office of
Diversion Control, Drug Enforcement
Administration, issued an Order to
Show Cause to Patrick W. Stodola, M.D.
(Respondent), of Chicago, Illinois. The
Show Cause Order proposed the
revocation of Respondent’s DEA
Certificate of Registration, AS2352653,
as a practitioner, and proposed the
denial of his pending application to
renew his registration, on the ground
that his ‘‘continued registration is
inconsistent with the public interest.’’
Show Cause Order at 1.
The Show Cause Order specifically
alleged that while Respondent is
licensed as a physician only in Illinois,
he prescribed controlled substances, via
the internet, to persons located in
twenty-six other States. Id. The Order
alleged that Respondent’s prescribing
constituted the unauthorized practice of
medicine because he did not possess the
licenses required to practice medicine
(and prescribe) in these States, and that
the prescriptions he authorized ‘‘were
not issued in the usual course of
professional practice as required by 21
CFR 1306.04.’’ Id. at 1–2.
On March 14, 2007, Respondent filed
a request for a hearing and the matter
was placed on the docket of the
Agency’s Administrative Law Judges.
Following pre-hearing procedures, a
hearing was held on October 16, 2007,
in Chicago, Illinois. At the hearing, both
parties elicited testimony and
introduced documentary evidence for
the record. Following the hearing, both
parties submitted briefs containing their
proposed findings of fact, conclusions of
law and argument.
On September 16, 2008, the ALJ
issued her recommended decision (ALJ).
In evaluating Respondent’s experience
in dispensing controlled substances and
record of compliance with applicable
VerDate Nov<24>2008
23:12 May 04, 2009
Jkt 217001
laws, the ALJ concluded that
Respondent had violated the medical
practice standards adopted by multiple
States which specifically require that a
physician physically examine a patient
before prescribing a drug to him/her.
ALJ at 33–34. The ALJ further
concluded that Respondent had violated
the laws of numerous States by
prescribing to their residents without
holding the requisites licenses to
practice medicine and/or dispense
controlled substances. Id. at 34. While
the ALJ found that Respondent has
retained his Illinois medical license and
has not been convicted of a crime, she
further found that Respondent has
‘‘refus[ed] to acknowledge his
wrongdoing.’’ Id. at 32 & 34. The ALJ
thus ‘‘conclude[d] that Respondent is
unwilling or unable to accept the
responsibilities inherent in a DEA
registration,’’ and recommended that his
registration be revoked and that any
pending applications be denied. Id. at
35.
Respondent did not file exceptions to
the ALJ’s decision.1 Thereafter, the
record was forwarded to me for final
agency action.
Having considered the entire record
in this matter, I adopt the ALJ’s
conclusions of law with respect to the
public interest inquiry. I further adopt
the ALJ’s recommended sanction.
Accordingly, I will revoke Respondent’s
registration and deny his pending
application to renew the registration. I
make the following findings.
Findings
Respondent is the holder of DEA
Certificate of Registration, AS2352653,
which authorizes him to dispensing
controlled substances in schedules II
through V as a practitioner. According
to Respondent’s Certificate of
Registration, the expiration date of his
registration was February 28, 2006. It is
undisputed, however, that Respondent
filed a timely renewal application. I
therefore find that Respondent’s
registration has remained in effect
pending the issuance of this Order. See
5 U.S.C. 558(c).
Respondent holds a medical license
in Illinois. Tr. 85, 190–91. In his
testimony, Respondent acknowledged
that he is not licensed to practice
medicine in any other State, id. at 85 &
191, and that he has never obtained a
license to practice in any other State. Id.
at 85. Moreover, Respondent does not
hold a DEA registration for a location in
any State other than Illinois. Id. at 191.
1 While the Government filed exceptions, the
exceptions do not go to the merits of the
proceeding.
PO 00000
Frm 00057
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
20727
In early 2006, Respondent read an
advertisement which had been placed
by Just USA Meds 2 in the employment
section of the Chicago Tribune’s Web
site. Id. at 165. Respondent called the
phone number contained in the ad, and
spoke with Challen Sullivan, Just USA’s
owner, who told him that his business
‘‘was to be a provider of medical
services,’’ but not ‘‘a dispenser or a
vending machine of any particular
medications.’’ Id. at 87. Thereafter,
Respondent entered into an agreement
with the entity under which Just USA
Meds would arrange for customers, who
were seeking controlled substances, to
speak with him by telephone. Id. at 14.
Respondent was paid $20 per
consultation and would typically issue
a controlled-substance prescription for
the patient upon the conclusion of the
consultation. Id. The prescriptions were
then sent to pharmacies which had
entered into arrangements with Just
USA Meds to dispense the drugs to its
customers.
According to Respondent, a customer
would contact Just USA Meds, identify
himself, and provide a copy of the credit
card which he intended to use to pay
his bill. Id. at 91. Respondent asserted
that a customer would then be
interviewed by an employee of Just USA
Meds, who would ask him the name of
his doctor, what other drugs he was
taking, and whether he would agree not
to seek drugs from another source if
Respondent (or the other doctors
engaged by Just USA Meds) issued a
prescription for him. Id. at 92. Just USA
would then contact the customer’s
credit card company to verify whether
the card was valid and to request a precharge for the anticipated amount of the
services and drugs being provided. Id.
After Just USA obtained the pre-charge,
the customer would then be scheduled
for a consultation with Respondent or
another physician. Id. at 104.
Respondent admitted that he did not
physically examine any of the persons
who were referred to him by Just USA
Meds. Tr. 18 (testimony of DI); id. at 84
(testimony of Respondent).3 Rather,
Respondent asserted that the customers
were required to send in medical
records including the documentation of
a physical exam which had to be less
than one year old. Id. at 97–98. He also
maintained that persons who claimed
‘‘some sort of structural harm’’ were
2 In this decision, Just USA Meds will also be
referred to as ‘‘Just USA.’’
3 Respondent did not even physically examine
those persons he prescribed to who resided in the
Chicago area. See GX 34 at 24 (resident of Chicago);
GX 39 at 63 (resident of Highland Park, Il.); Id. at
133 (resident of Arlington Heights, Il.); Id. at 171
(resident of Hoffman Estates, Il.).
E:\FR\FM\05MYN1.SGM
05MYN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 85 (Tuesday, May 5, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 20726-20727]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-10301]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
[FBMS Charge Code L07770000.XG0000]
Field Office Relocation
AGENCY: Bureau of Land Management, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of Relocation and Name Change of the Bureau of Land
Management's Folsom Office in Folsom, CA.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Bureau of Land Management's
(BLM) Folsom Field Office is moving from its current location at 63
Natoma St., Folsom, CA to a new building located at 5152 Hillsdale
Circle, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762. The office name will be the Mother
Lode Field Office effective with the move. The BLM will move the weeks
of May 4 and 11 and resume full operations at the new office on Monday,
May 18, 2009, at 7 a.m.
The BLM encourages the public to arrange any work with BLM before
May 1. The new telephone number is: (916) 941-3101 and is scheduled to
be on line by May 18.
Directions to the new BLM office: from Highway 50 eastbound, take
the Latrobe Road exit. Go 2.4 miles and turn right on Investment
Boulevard. Go 0.1 miles and turn right on Robert J. Matthews Parkway.
Go 0.1 mile and turn left on Hillsdale Circle. The office is on the
left in 0.2 mile. The new address is: Bureau of Land Management, Mother
Lode Field Office, 5152
[[Page 20727]]
Hillsdale Circle, El Dorado Hills, CA 95762.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: BLM Folsom Field Office at (916) 985-
4474.
Dated: April 3, 2009.
William S. Haigh,
Field Office Manager.
[FR Doc. E9-10301 Filed 5-4-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
