McNary and Umatilla National Wildlife Refuges, Benton, Walla Walla, and Franklin Counties, WA, and Morrow and Umatilla Counties, OR, 19975-19976 [E9-9325]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 82 / Thursday, April 30, 2009 / Notices
authorizes the funding for IRR. While
the list is long, those data elements can
also be helpful to tribes who coordinate
projects and transportation activities
with other public authorities. It is not
all required to be provided in order to
participate in the program; that is the
reason for default values in the CFR
tables. The commenter stated that there
is a difference in requested items from
region to region because of politics and
physical roadway characteristics, and
questioned the practical utility of some
requested information, suggesting a
committee evaluate the need further
since not all requested information is
listed in the CFR. The BIA participated
in many meetings of committees and
public hearings when the requirements
were developed—the result was a list of
requirements that covered all situations,
but not necessarily all requirements are
needed for each situation. The
commenter also stated that too much
information is required in certain
instances. The BIA has determined that,
in those instances, the additional data
are beneficial in supporting more
accurate decisions rather than using
default tables and that it is beneficial to
the tribe to include this information.
The commenter stated that they believe
that the time and cost of submitting
certain information far exceeds their
estimated amount. The time and cost
associated with data collection and
submission has been consistently
decreasing in the three years prior to
this request for comment as improved
methods of collection are developed.
The estimated time and cost of
submitting data indicates that the
commenters are increasingly successful
in assuring that data are provided for
purposes identified. Finally, the
commenter stated that use of automated
techniques does not abrogate the
physical collection of data and that a
technological solution may be available
with funds for equipment and staff to
maintain the automated equipment. In
response, the BIA notes that no special
equipment is necessary for this
information collection, and that more
advanced techniques are available but
this collection process does not require
their use. The BIA did not make any
changes to the information collection
request for approval in response to these
comments.
III. Request for Comments
The BIA requests your comments on
this collection concerning: (a) The
necessity of this information collection
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; (b) the accuracy of the
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:35 Apr 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
agency’s estimate of the burden (hours
and cost) of the collection of
information, including the validity of
the methodology and assumptions used;
(c) ways we could enhance the quality,
utility and clarity of the information to
be collected; and (d) ways we could
minimize the burden of the collection of
the information on the commenters,
such as through the use of automated
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Please note that an agency may not
sponsor or request, and an individual
need not respond to, a collection of
information unless it has a valid OMB
Control Number. OMB has up to 60 days
to make a decision on the submission
for renewal, but may make the decision
after 30 days. Therefore, to receive the
best consideration of your comments,
you should submit them closer to 30
days than 60 days.
It is our policy to make all comments
available to the public for review at the
location listed in the ADDRESSES section,
room 4516 MIB, during the hours of 8
a.m.–4:30 p.m., EST Monday through
Friday except for legal holidays. Before
including your address, phone number,
e-mail address or other personally
identifiable information, be advised that
your entire comment—including your
personally identifiable information—
may be made public at any time. While
you may request that we withhold your
personally identifiable information, we
cannot guarantee that we will be able to
do so. All comments from organizations
or representatives will be available for
review. We may withhold comments
from review for other reasons.
IV. Data
OMB Approval Number: 1076–0161.
Title: 25 CFR 170, Indian Reservation
Roads.
Brief Description of Collection: Some
of the information such as the
application of Indian Reservation Roads
High Priority Projects (IRRHPP) (25 CFR
170.210), the road inventory updates (25
CFR 170.443), the development of a long
range transportation plan (25 CFR
170.411 and 170.412), the development
of a tribal transportation improvement
program and priority list (25 CFR
170.420 and 170.421) are required to
maintain or obtain a benefit
(consideration of projects and for
program funding from the formula).
Some of the information such as public
hearing requirements are also required
to maintain or obtain a benefit and
provides public notification and the
opportunity for public involvement (25
CFR 170.437 and 170.439). While others
such as data appeals (25 CFR 170.231)
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19975
and requests for design exceptions (25
CFR 170.456) are voluntary information.
Type of Review: Renewal.
Respondents: Respondents include
Federally recognized Indian tribal
governments who have transportation
needs associated with the IRR Program
as described in 25 CFR 170.
Number of Respondents: Varies from
10 to 281.
Estimated Time per Response: The
reports require from 30 minutes to 40
hours to complete. An average would be
16 hours.
Frequency of Response: Annually or
on an as needed basis.
Total Annual Burden to Respondents:
19,628 hours.
Total Annual Cost to Respondents:
$0.
Dated: April 24, 2009.
Sanjeev ‘‘Sonny’’ Bhagowalia,
Chief Information Officer—DOI.
[FR Doc. E9–9921 Filed 4–29–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–4J–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS–R1–NWRS–2009–N0016;1265–0000–
10137–S3]
McNary and Umatilla National Wildlife
Refuges, Benton, Walla Walla, and
Franklin Counties, WA, and Morrow
and Umatilla Counties, OR
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service,
Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of the final
comprehensive conservation plan,
environmental assessment, and finding
of no significant impact.
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (Service), have
completed a comprehensive
conservation plan, environmental
assessment (CCP/EA), and finding of no
significant impact (FONSI) for the
McNary and Umatilla National Wildlife
Refuges (Refuges), which are part of the
Mid-Columbia River National Wildlife
Refuge Complex (Complex). The CCP/
EA was developed to provide a
foundation for the management and use
of the Refuges. We are furnishing this
notice to advise other agencies and the
public of the availability of the CCP/EA
and FONSI, and the decision to
implement Alternative 2 as described in
the CCP/EA. The Service’s Regional
Director for the Pacific Region selected
Alternative 2 for managing the Refuges
for the next 15 years. The Refuges are
located along the Columbia River in the
states of Oregon and Washington.
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
19976
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 82 / Thursday, April 30, 2009 / Notices
DATES: The CCP/EA and FONSI are
completed, implementation may begin
immediately.
ADDRESSES: The CCP/EA and FONSI are
available for viewing at Mid-Columbia
River National Wildlife Refuge
Complex, 64 Maple Street, Burbank, WA
99323, and copies on compact disk may
be obtained by visiting or writing to the
Refuge Complex. These documents are
also available for viewing and
downloading on the Internet at https://
pacific.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg
Hughes, Project Leader, Mid-Columbia
River National Wildlife Refuge
Complex, phone (509) 546–8300.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: With this
notice, we complete the CCP process for
the McNary and Umatilla National
Wildlife Refuges that began in 2004 (69
FR 29568, May 24, 2004). The McNary
and Umatilla Refuges are part of the
National Wildlife Refuge System
(NWRS) administered by the Service.
The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (Refuge
Administration Act), as amended,
requires all units of the NWRS to be
managed in accordance with an
approved CCP. A CCP provides
management direction, and identifies
refuge goals, objectives, and strategies
for achieving refuge purposes. We
prepared the CCP/EA and FONSI for the
McNary and Umatilla Refuges pursuant
to the National Environmental Policy
Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321–
4370d), as amended, and its
implementing regulations, the Refuge
Administration Act, and Service
policies.
McNary Refuge is located in Walla
Walla and Franklin Counties,
Washington, and Umatilla County,
Oregon. Umatilla Refuge is located in
Benton County, Washington, and
Morrow County, Oregon. Planning for
these Refuges was conducted
concurrently, because many of the same
physical characteristics, management
issues, and conservation opportunities
occur on, or are relevant to, the
management of each of the Refuges.
During the CCP planning process for
the Refuges many elements were
considered, including management of
the Refuges’ shrub-steppe, riparian,
wetland, and cliff-talus habitats for the
long-term conservation of native plants
and animals and migratory birds. We
identified appropriate actions in the
CCP for protecting and sustaining the
cultural and biological features of the
river islands, the Refuges’ wintering
waterfowl populations and habitats, the
growing migratory shorebird
populations that use the Refuges, and
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:35 Apr 29, 2009
Jkt 217001
threatened, endangered, or rare species.
Guidance for maintaining and
improving high quality public use
programs for hunting, fishing, wildlife
observation, photography,
environmental education, and
interpretation is also provided in the
CCP/EA.
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Public Comments and Changes to the
CCP
ACTION:
We identified and evaluated four
alternatives in the Draft CCP/EA for
managing the Refuges. The Draft CCP/
EA was available for a 30-day public
review and comment period, which
occurred January 23 through February
23, 2007 (January 29, 2007, 72 FR 4019).
Notification was sent to 700 individuals
and organizations on our mailing list for
this CCP, and public notice was
provided in local media and on the
Complex Web site.
The Service received 105 comment
letters, forms, or emails on the Draft
CCP, which were incorporated into, or
otherwise responded to, in the final
CCP. To address public comments,
minor changes and clarifications were
made to the final CCP/EA where we
considered it appropriate.
CCP Implementation
The Regional Director, U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service, Region 1, signed the
FONSI and approved the CCP/EA on
May 7, 2007. By implementing the CCP,
the Service will manage Refuge
resources for migratory birds and will
enhance populations of targeted special
status species and their habitats. Habitat
conditions for migratory waterfowl,
shorebirds, threatened and endangered
species, and other native wildlife will
be improved. The Refuges will
emphasize control and reduction of
weeds and improvement of riparian,
shrub-steppe, island, and cliff habitats.
Wildlife-dependent public use will be
emphasized with opportunities for
hunting, fishing, wildlife observation,
photography, interpretation, and
environmental education either
maintained or improved from present
conditions. A Washington State
pheasant augmentation/release program
will be phased out in two years and
camping will be discontinued at
Madame Dorion Park. Disturbance to
island resources will be reduced
through closure of all beach use on
Refuge islands.
Dated: January 13, 2009.
David J. Wesley,
Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. E9–9325 Filed 4–29–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310–55–P
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
National Park Service
Notice of Inventory Completion: New
York University College of Dentistry,
New York, NY
National Park Service, Interior.
Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is here given in accordance
with the Native American Graves
Protection and Repatriation Act
(NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. 3003, of the
completion of an inventory of human
remains in the possession of the New
York University College of Dentistry,
New York, NY. The human remains
were removed from Morton County, ND.
This notice is published as part of the
National Park Service’s administrative
responsibilities under NAGPRA, 25
U.S.C. 3003 (d)(3). The determinations
in this notice are the sole responsibility
of the museum, institution, or Federal
agency that has control of the Native
American human remains. The National
Park Service is not responsible for the
determinations in this notice.
A detailed assessment of the human
remains was made by New York
University College of Dentistry
professional staff in consultation with
representatives of the Three Affiliated
Tribes of the Fort Berthold Reservation,
North Dakota.
At an unknown date, human remains
representing a minimum of two
individuals were removed from On-ASlant Village, Ft. Abraham Lincoln, near
Bismarck, Morton County, ND, by an
unknown collector. In 1925, the human
remains were accessioned by the
Department of Physical Anthropology at
the Museum of the American Indian,
Heye Foundation. In 1956, the human
remains were transferred to Dr.
Theodore Kazamiroff, New York
University College of Dentistry. No
known individuals were identified. No
associated funerary objects are present.
Museum of the American Indian
records identify the provenience of the
human remains as ‘‘Ft. Abraham
Lincoln, near Bismarck, North Dakota.’’
Fort Abraham Lincoln is also the site of
a Historic Period Mandan Village
known as On-A-Slant Village (32MO26).
The cranium of one of the individuals
is painted with a red pigment matching
historically described and
archeologically confirmed mortuary
customs of the Mandan.
On-A-Slant Village is documented
historically, archeologically and by
tribal oral traditions as a village of the
Plains Village Period dating to A.D.
1450–1785, and occupied by the Nuitadi
E:\FR\FM\30APN1.SGM
30APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 82 (Thursday, April 30, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19975-19976]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9325]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR
Fish and Wildlife Service
[FWS-R1-NWRS-2009-N0016;1265-0000-10137-S3]
McNary and Umatilla National Wildlife Refuges, Benton, Walla
Walla, and Franklin Counties, WA, and Morrow and Umatilla Counties, OR
AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, Interior.
ACTION: Notice of availability of the final comprehensive conservation
plan, environmental assessment, and finding of no significant impact.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), have
completed a comprehensive conservation plan, environmental assessment
(CCP/EA), and finding of no significant impact (FONSI) for the McNary
and Umatilla National Wildlife Refuges (Refuges), which are part of the
Mid-Columbia River National Wildlife Refuge Complex (Complex). The CCP/
EA was developed to provide a foundation for the management and use of
the Refuges. We are furnishing this notice to advise other agencies and
the public of the availability of the CCP/EA and FONSI, and the
decision to implement Alternative 2 as described in the CCP/EA. The
Service's Regional Director for the Pacific Region selected Alternative
2 for managing the Refuges for the next 15 years. The Refuges are
located along the Columbia River in the states of Oregon and
Washington.
[[Page 19976]]
DATES: The CCP/EA and FONSI are completed, implementation may begin
immediately.
ADDRESSES: The CCP/EA and FONSI are available for viewing at Mid-
Columbia River National Wildlife Refuge Complex, 64 Maple Street,
Burbank, WA 99323, and copies on compact disk may be obtained by
visiting or writing to the Refuge Complex. These documents are also
available for viewing and downloading on the Internet at https://pacific.fws.gov/planning.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Greg Hughes, Project Leader, Mid-
Columbia River National Wildlife Refuge Complex, phone (509) 546-8300.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: With this notice, we complete the CCP
process for the McNary and Umatilla National Wildlife Refuges that
began in 2004 (69 FR 29568, May 24, 2004). The McNary and Umatilla
Refuges are part of the National Wildlife Refuge System (NWRS)
administered by the Service. The National Wildlife Refuge System
Administration Act of 1966 (Refuge Administration Act), as amended,
requires all units of the NWRS to be managed in accordance with an
approved CCP. A CCP provides management direction, and identifies
refuge goals, objectives, and strategies for achieving refuge purposes.
We prepared the CCP/EA and FONSI for the McNary and Umatilla Refuges
pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 (42
U.S.C. 4321-4370d), as amended, and its implementing regulations, the
Refuge Administration Act, and Service policies.
McNary Refuge is located in Walla Walla and Franklin Counties,
Washington, and Umatilla County, Oregon. Umatilla Refuge is located in
Benton County, Washington, and Morrow County, Oregon. Planning for
these Refuges was conducted concurrently, because many of the same
physical characteristics, management issues, and conservation
opportunities occur on, or are relevant to, the management of each of
the Refuges.
During the CCP planning process for the Refuges many elements were
considered, including management of the Refuges' shrub-steppe,
riparian, wetland, and cliff-talus habitats for the long-term
conservation of native plants and animals and migratory birds. We
identified appropriate actions in the CCP for protecting and sustaining
the cultural and biological features of the river islands, the Refuges'
wintering waterfowl populations and habitats, the growing migratory
shorebird populations that use the Refuges, and threatened, endangered,
or rare species. Guidance for maintaining and improving high quality
public use programs for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation,
photography, environmental education, and interpretation is also
provided in the CCP/EA.
Public Comments and Changes to the CCP
We identified and evaluated four alternatives in the Draft CCP/EA
for managing the Refuges. The Draft CCP/EA was available for a 30-day
public review and comment period, which occurred January 23 through
February 23, 2007 (January 29, 2007, 72 FR 4019). Notification was sent
to 700 individuals and organizations on our mailing list for this CCP,
and public notice was provided in local media and on the Complex Web
site.
The Service received 105 comment letters, forms, or emails on the
Draft CCP, which were incorporated into, or otherwise responded to, in
the final CCP. To address public comments, minor changes and
clarifications were made to the final CCP/EA where we considered it
appropriate.
CCP Implementation
The Regional Director, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Region 1,
signed the FONSI and approved the CCP/EA on May 7, 2007. By
implementing the CCP, the Service will manage Refuge resources for
migratory birds and will enhance populations of targeted special status
species and their habitats. Habitat conditions for migratory waterfowl,
shorebirds, threatened and endangered species, and other native
wildlife will be improved. The Refuges will emphasize control and
reduction of weeds and improvement of riparian, shrub-steppe, island,
and cliff habitats. Wildlife-dependent public use will be emphasized
with opportunities for hunting, fishing, wildlife observation,
photography, interpretation, and environmental education either
maintained or improved from present conditions. A Washington State
pheasant augmentation/release program will be phased out in two years
and camping will be discontinued at Madame Dorion Park. Disturbance to
island resources will be reduced through closure of all beach use on
Refuge islands.
Dated: January 13, 2009.
David J. Wesley,
Regional Director, Region 1, Portland, Oregon.
[FR Doc. E9-9325 Filed 4-29-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4310-55-P