Establishment of the Lake Chelan Viticultural Area (2007R-103P), 19409-19416 [E9-9847]
Download as PDF
tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
an outer and immediate container of a
retail package, this warning must appear
on both the outer and immediate
containers.
(B) ‘‘Ask a doctor before use if [bullet]
stomach bleeding warning applies to
you [bullet] you have a history of
stomach problems, such as heartburn
[bullet] you have high blood pressure,
heart disease, liver cirrhosis, or kidney
disease [bullet] you are taking a
diuretic’’.
(C) ‘‘Stop use and ask a doctor if
[bullet] you experience any of the
following signs of stomach bleeding:’’
[add the following as second level of
statements: ‘‘[bullet] feel faint [bullet]
vomit blood [bullet] have bloody or
black stools [bullet] have stomach pain
that does not get better’’].
(iv) For products labeled only for
children under 12 years of age.
(A) Warnings. The labeling of the
product states the following warnings
under the heading ‘‘Warnings’’:
(1) ‘‘Stomach bleeding warning
[heading in bold type]: This product
contains a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID), which may
cause severe stomach bleeding. The
chance is higher if your child [bullet]
has had stomach ulcers or bleeding
problems [bullet] takes a blood thinning
(anticoagulant) or steroid drug [bullet]
takes other drugs containing
prescription or nonprescription NSAIDs
(aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen, or others)
[bullet] takes more or for a longer time
than directed’’. The ‘‘Stomach bleeding
warning’’ must appear after the ‘‘Reye’s
syndrome’’ and ‘‘Allergy alert’’
warnings in § 201.66(c)(5)(ii)(A) and
(c)(5)(ii)(B). If there is an outer and
immediate container of a retail package,
this warning must appear on both the
outer and immediate containers.
(2) ‘‘Ask a doctor before use if [bullet]
stomach bleeding warning applies to
your child [bullet] child has a history of
stomach problems, such as heartburn
[bullet] child has not been drinking
fluids [bullet] child has lost a lot of fluid
due to vomiting or diarrhea [bullet]
child has high blood pressure, heart
disease, liver cirrhosis, or kidney
disease [bullet] child is taking a
diuretic’’.
(3) ‘‘Stop use and ask a doctor if
[bullet] child experiences any of the
following signs of stomach bleeding:’’
[add the following as second level of
statements: [bullet] feels faint [bullet]
vomits blood [bullet] has bloody or
black stools [bullet] has stomach pain
that does not get better’’].
(B) Directions. The labeling of the
product contains the following
information under the heading
‘‘Directions’’: ‘‘this product does not
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:08 Apr 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
contain directions or complete warnings
for adult use’’ [in bold type].
(v) For products labeled for adults
and children under 12 years of age. The
labeling of the product states all of the
warnings in paragraphs (a)(2)(iii)(A)
through (a)(2)(iii)(C) of this section with
the following modifications:
(A) The Stomach bleeding warning
states ‘‘Stomach bleeding warning
[heading in bold type]: This product
contains a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID), which may
cause severe stomach bleeding. The
chance is higher if the user [bullet] has
had stomach ulcers or bleeding
problems [bullet] takes a blood thinning
(anticoagulant) or steroid drug [bullet]
takes other drugs containing
prescription or nonprescription NSAIDs
(aspirin, ibuprofen, naproxen, or others)
[bullet] takes more or for a longer time
than directed [bullet] is age 60 or older
[bullet] has 3 or more alcoholic drinks
everyday while using this product’’. The
‘‘Stomach bleeding warning’’ must
appear after the ‘‘Reye’s syndrome’’ and
‘‘Allergy alert’’ warnings in
§ 201.66(c)(5)(ii)(A) and (c)(5)(ii)(B). If
there is an outer and immediate
container of a retail package, this
warning must appear on both the outer
and immediate containers.
(B) The labeling states ‘‘Ask a doctor
before use if [bullet] stomach bleeding
warning applies to user [bullet] user has
history of stomach problems, such as
heartburn [bullet] user has high blood
pressure, heart disease, liver cirrhosis,
or kidney disease [bullet] user takes a
diuretic [bullet] user has not been
drinking fluids [bullet] user has lost a
lot of fluid due to vomiting or diarrhea’’.
(C) The labeling states ‘‘Stop use and
ask a doctor if [bullet] user experiences
any of the following signs of stomach
bleeding:’’ [add the following as second
level of statements: [bullet] feels faint
[bullet] vomits blood [bullet] has bloody
or black stools [bullet] has stomach pain
that does not get better’’].
(b) New warnings information
statement. The labeling of any drug
product subject to this section that is
initially introduced or initially
delivered for introduction into interstate
commerce before the effective date and
within 12 months after the effective date
of the final rule must bear on its PDP,
as defined in § 201.60, the statement
‘‘See new warnings information.’’ This
statement must appear highlighted (e.g.,
fluorescent or color contrast) or in bold
type, be in lines generally parallel to the
base on which the package rests as it is
designed to be displayed, and be in one
of the following sizes, whichever is
greater: (1) At least one-quarter as large
as the size of the most prominent
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19409
printed matter on the PDP, or (2) At
least as large as the size of the ‘‘Drug
Facts’’ title, as required in
§ 201.66(d)(2).
(c) Requirements to supplement
approved application. Holders of
approved applications for OTC drug
products that contain internal analgesic/
antipyretic active ingredients that are
subject to the requirements of paragraph
(a) of this section must submit
supplements under § 314.70(c) of this
chapter to include the required
information in the product’s labeling.
Such labeling may be put into use
without advance approval of FDA
provided it includes at least the exact
information included in paragraph (a) of
this section.
Dated: April 8, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E9–9684 Filed 4–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade
Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[TTB Docket No. 2008–0006; T.D. TTB–76;
Re: Notice No. 87]
RIN 1513–AB42
Establishment of the Lake Chelan
Viticultural Area (2007R–103P)
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and
Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION:
Final rule; Treasury decision.
SUMMARY: This Treasury decision
establishes the 24,040-acre ‘‘Lake
Chelan’’ American viticultural area in
Chelan County, Washington. It lies
within the larger Columbia Valley
viticultural area in north-central
Washington. We designate viticultural
areas to allow vintners to better describe
the origin of their wines and to allow
consumers to better identify wines they
may purchase.
DATES:
Effective Date: May 29, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Christopher Thiemann, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco
Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G Street,
NW., Room 200E, Washington, DC
20220; phone 202–927–8210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
19410
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol
Administration Act (FAA Act), 27
U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary
of the Treasury to prescribe regulations
for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits,
and malt beverages. The FAA Act
requires that these regulations, among
other things, prohibit consumer
deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels, and ensure that
labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity
and quality of the product. The Alcohol
and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
(TTB) administers the regulations
promulgated under the FAA Act.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR
part 4) allows the establishment of
definitive viticultural areas and the use
of their names as appellations of origin
on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR part 9) contains the
list of approved viticultural areas.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB
regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i)) defines
a viticultural area for American wine as
a delimited grape-growing region
distinguishable by geographical
features, the boundaries of which have
been recognized and defined in part 9
of the regulations. These designations
allow vintners and consumers to
attribute a given quality, reputation, or
other characteristic of a wine made from
grapes grown in an area to its
geographical origin. The establishment
of viticultural areas allows vintners to
describe more accurately the origin of
their wines to consumers and helps
consumers to identify wines they may
purchase. Establishment of a viticultural
area is neither an approval nor an
endorsement by TTB of the wine
produced in that area.
tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB
regulations outlines the procedure for
proposing an American viticultural area
and provides that any interested party
may petition TTB to establish a grapegrowing region as a viticultural area.
Section 9.3(b) of the TTB regulations
requires the petition to include—
• Evidence that the proposed
viticultural area is locally and/or
nationally known by the name specified
in the petition;
• Historical or current evidence that
supports setting the boundary of the
proposed viticultural area as the
petition specifies;
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:08 Apr 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
• Evidence relating to the
geographical features, such as climate,
soils, elevation, and physical features,
that distinguish the proposed
viticultural area from surrounding areas;
• A description of the specific
boundary of the proposed viticultural
area, based on features found on United
States Geological Survey (USGS) maps;
and
• A copy of the appropriate USGS
map(s) with the proposed viticultural
area’s boundary prominently marked.
Lake Chelan Petition
Alan J. Busacca, PhD, a geologist
licensed in Washington State and a
nationally certified professional soil
scientist with Vinitas Vineyard
Consultants, submitted a petition on
behalf of the Lake Chelan Wine Growers
Association to establish the 24,040-acre
Lake Chelan American viticultural area
in north-central Washington. Some of
the petition evidence and
documentation provided relies on the
previous research and writings of Dr.
Busacca. Additional petition resources
include Government-published climatic,
topographic, and soils data, as well as
maps, municipal resources, commercial
publications, personal correspondence,
and anecdotal information.
The Lake Chelan Valley lies about 112
miles east-northeast of Seattle,
according to USGS and commercial
maps. The petitioner explained that the
proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area
lies entirely within the large,
established Columbia Valley viticultural
area (27 CFR 9.74). TTB notes that the
Lake Chelan region lies to the east of the
Puget Sound viticultural area (27 CFR
9.151) and to the north of other
Washington State viticultural areas. The
proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area
neither borders nor includes any portion
of any other Washington State
viticultural area except the Columbia
Valley viticultural area.
The petitioner explained that the
proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area
includes the southern and eastern
portions of the large body of water
known as Lake Chelan and its
surrounding lands suitable for
viticulture. According to the petitioner,
at the time of the 2006 petition filing
with TTB, the proposed viticultural area
included 13 bonded wineries, 140 acres
of vineyards, and another 50 acres to be
planted to grape vines.
According to the petitioner,
distinguishing features of the proposed
Lake Chelan viticultural area include its
geology, geography, soils, and climate as
directly influenced by past alpine
glacial activity of the Cascade region.
Lake Chelan Valley is the only valley in
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
the Cascade Range in Oregon or
Washington that holds a natural lake of
its size. The climate of the agricultural
and viticultural lands surrounding the
lower (eastern) end of the lake is
strongly moderated by the thermal effect
of the lake on the air temperatures. The
glacier that formed during the last ice
age and traveled from the Cascade crest
to the eastern end of the modern lake
left a defining imprint on the landforms
of the Lake Chelan Valley. In addition,
the petitioner claimed that pumice and
ash from eruptions of volcanoes in the
Cascade Range, principally Glacier Peak
to the west of the proposed viticultural
area, formed soils that are ashier and
more pumiceous than those in any other
established viticultural area in
Washington State.
We summarize below the supporting
evidence submitted with the petition.
Name Evidence
The ‘‘Chelan’’ geographic name
derives from the name that Alexander
Ross, an American fur trader, in about
1824 used to describe the ‘‘Tsill-anes,’’
a native people living along the south
shore of Lake Chelan, according to
‘‘Chelan County—Thumbnail History,’’
an article from the Washington State
Department of Archeology and Historic
Preservation, The Online Encyclopedia
of Washington State History at https://
www.historylink.org.
The ‘‘Lake Chelan’’ name appears on
the USGS Chelan, Manson, and
Winesap quadrangle maps. The USGS
Chelan map, sections 11 and 12, T27N
and R23N, identifies an area to the
north-northwest of the small town of
Chelan as the ‘‘Lake Chelan Golf and
Country Club.’’ The DeLorme
Washington Atlas and Gazetteer
identifies ‘‘Lake Chelan’’ on page 83,
sections A7, B7, and B8. The American
Automobile Association map, Oregon
Washington State Series, identifies
‘‘Lake Chelan’’ as a long slender lake
extending northwest from the North
Cascades National Park southeast to the
Chelan Dam, approximately 2 miles
northwest of the Columbia River.
An article entitled ‘‘Chelan and
Stehekin, WA,’’ dated August 12, 2006,
on https://www.nwsource.com, a
northwest travel and outdoors Web site,
states that Lake Chelan is one of
Washington’s favorite summer
recreation areas.
Boundary Evidence
According to the petitioner and the
written boundary description, the
proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area
encompasses the southernmost and
easternmost 12 miles of the 55-mile-long
lake and surrounding lands. A bedrock
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES
ridge, with a pinnacle at a 1,526-foot
elevation, divides the approximately
1,200-foot elevation of the south Lake
Chelan region from the 707-foot
elevation of the Columbia River,
according to USGS maps of the area and
the petitioner. Lands to the east and
southeast of the proposed viticultural
area are within the Columbia River
airshed and watershed, and have
different climates, geology, and soils.
The upper 43 miles of Lake Chelan
and its shoreline lie outside of the
proposed viticultural area, according to
the written boundary description
provided in the petition. According to
the petitioner, in the northern lake
region the surrounding Cascade Range
provides significant downward cold air
drainage from peaks to valley floor and
blocks the sun from the adjacent valley
lands. The cold air and shade combine
with a steep shoreline terrain to create
a region unsuitable for grape growing.
Additionally, the North Cascades
National Park surrounds the north end
of Lake Chelan, and commercial
agricultural development is prohibited
within its borders.
Lands with viticultural potential in
the Lake Chelan Valley area, the
petitioner states, are generally at or
below 2,000 feet in elevation. High
mountains ridges, beyond the boundary
of the proposed Lake Chelan viticultural
area, rise over 5,000 feet in elevation to
the north and west and to 3,800 feet to
the south, cradling the Lake Chelan
Valley region on three sides, according
to the petitioner and USGS maps. The
petition explains that these high
mountains, which have cold climates
and forested terrain, are unsuited to
viticulture.
History of Viticulture
According to the Chelan Valley Mirror
dated May 1, 1947, Urban DeGrassi, a
Jesuit priest, spent several years in the
Lake Chelan region teaching Native
Americans about agriculture. Based on
Father DeGrassi’s teachings, in 1881,
John and Peter Wapato, Native
Americans of Chelan Valley, started
planting fruit eventually including
grapes and cherries.
According to an article in the August
6, 1891, edition of the Chelan Falls
Leader, Louis Conti, an Italian
immigrant, owned a 60-acre vineyard in
the Lake Chelan area. The article stated
that a colony of Italian immigrants,
living on the sunnier south side of the
lake, planted grape vines on their
claimed lands.
Two 1905 photographs from the
Chelan County Historical Society show
grapes growing in the Lake Chelan area.
A photo of grapes on the vine is labeled
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:08 Apr 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
‘‘Black Hamburg Grapes—Lake Chelan.’’
The petitioner explains that the
common name for those grapes is Black
Muscat. The other photo, which shows
a little boy sitting on the ground beside
grapes hanging heavily from a vine, is
labeled ‘‘Lake Chelan Grapes.’’
The Faletto family continued growing
grapes into the early 1900’s, according
to an e-mail dated November 22, 2005,
from family member Rich Faletto. Mr.
Faletto stated of his grandfather, ‘‘Old
John was the vintner and winery
operator in the valley, producing great
wine from [grapevines] brought to the
area by a group of Italians.’’
The Chelan and Manson areas, within
the proposed viticultural area,
comprised 154 acres of producing
vineyards, according to a November 17,
1949, newspaper article written by
Harry R. McMullen. According to the
article, that year grape growers received
2 cents a pound, or $40 a ton, from the
Welch Company.
Modern Viticulture
The petitioner states that in 1998,
Steve Kludt and Bob Christopher
replanted apple orchards to grapes
within the proposed Lake Chelan
viticultural area. Also, in 2000 the Kludt
family opened the first bonded winery
in the area and in 2001 started selling
wine. Vineyard production in the Lake
Chelan region increased from over 90
acres in 2004 to 140 acres by 2006.
According to the petitioner, 13 bonded
wineries operated in the Lake Chelan
area as of the 2006 petition submission
date.
Proposed Boundary Line
The petitioner explains that the
proposed boundary line uses a 2,000foot elevation line and USGS map
section lines in conjunction with roads,
mountain peaks, and other map
markings in providing a clear, simple
perimeter. The proposed Lake Chelan
viticultural area boundary line includes
lands adjacent to the southernmost 12
miles of the lake, according to the
petition.
In determining the proposed
boundary line, the petitioner included
in the proposed viticultural area only
the valley areas with a significant ‘‘lake
effect’’ climate. The lake affects
surrounding lands, the petitioner
explains, by favorably moderating the
climate, increasing the length of the
growing season, and reducing the
frequency of damaging or killing vine
freezes. The petitioner states that the
proposed boundary line excludes from
the proposed viticultural area the
surrounding mountainous areas and the
northern 43 miles of the lake and
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19411
adjacent lands, all unsuitable for
viticulture.
TTB notes that the northeast portion
of the boundary of the proposed Lake
Chelan viticultural area coincides with
17 miles of the 2,000-foot boundary line
of the Columbia Valley viticultural area.
When the petition was first submitted to
TTB, the proposed northeast boundary
line incorporated a series of map section
lines and 90-degree turns. After
discussions with TTB, the petitioner
modified the northeast portion of the
boundary line to coincide with the
boundary line of the Columbia Valley
viticultural area.
The petitioner provides an aerial
photo of agriculture within and
immediately outside of the proposed
Lake Chelan viticultural area. The
planted orchards and vineyards are
clustered on the low, flat elevations
adjoining the northern and southern
shorelines of the lake. The petitioner
explains that viticulture fails to thrive
outside the proposed boundary line
because of high elevations, steep terrain,
cold temperatures, and the absence of a
moderating lake-effect climate.
Other boundary line considerations
include properties of the soil, the
influences of the watershed and airshed,
the elevations of the surrounding
mountains, and the steepness of the
terrain.
Distinguishing Features
Cascade Range Geographic Province
The proposed Lake Chelan
viticultural area, a part of the Cascade
Range geographic province, the
petitioner explains, includes distinctive
geology, geography, soils, and climate
that contrast to those of the surrounding
areas. The geology, the petitioner notes,
includes the advance of Cascade alpine
glaciers that occurred 14,000 to 18,000
years ago.
The Cascade Mountain Range runs
north-south through Washington and
Oregon and divides western and eastern
Washington, the petitioner explains.
The range creates, to the east, a rain
shadow that limits precipitation in the
Lake Chelan Valley and on the
Columbia Plateau in eastern
Washington. The range protects areas to
its east from Arctic and Pacific winter
storms and further moderates climate.
Lake Chelan Valley is the only valley
that the Cascade glacier created in
Washington and Oregon and that holds
a large natural lake of Lake Chelan’s
size. The lake is the third deepest lake
in the U.S., the petitioner emphasizes.
The soils in the valley formed in glacial
sediments layered below the more
recent windblown deposition of
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
19412
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
volcanic pumice and ash. Also, the large
glacial lake acts as a heat reservoir to
produce a unique climate of
consistently moderated temperatures.
Columbia Plateau Geographic Province
Most Washington vineyards, the
petitioner states, lie on the Columbia
Plateau geographic province, the
features of which contrast significantly
in several important ways from the Lake
Chelan Valley in the Cascade Range
geographic province. The distinguishing
features of the Columbia Plateau include
the bedrock of Tertiary-age basaltic
lavas, sediments derived from
cataclysmic outburst floods of Lake
Missoula, and bench-and-riser
landforms that the recurrent Missoula
Floods created through erosion of the
lavas. The topography varies from near
moonscapes to megasized gravel bars
and slackwater terraces.
The petitioner states that another
distinguishing feature of the Columbia
Plateau is the predominant east-west
trending valley-and-ridge system that
affects the elevation, slope, aspect, heat
accumulation, winds, and air drainage
of the plateau. Also, plateau elevations
vary from 460 feet at the Wahluke Slope
viticultural area (27 CFR 9.192) to 970
feet at the Walla Walla Valley
viticultural area (27 CFR 9.91), a
topography with a significantly lower
elevation than that of the Lake Chelan
area of the Cascade Range.
The separate climates of the Columbia
Plateau viticultural areas share low
winter temperatures with complete vine
dormancy and significant fall daytime
and nighttime temperature variations.
The viticultural areas of the Columbia
Plateau lie within the rain shadow of
the Cascade Range, and have a drier
climate as compared to western
Washington. The combination of
distinguishing features in the
viticultural areas on the Columbia
Plateau, the petitioner concludes,
creates a unique annual growing season
that contrasts with the Lake Chelan
Valley region in the Cascade Range
geographic province.
Geology
The petitioner explains that the most
recent ice-age events of the Earth,
14,000 to 18,000 years ago, played
significant roles in creating the differing
geological records within the Cascade
Range and the Columbia Plateau.
The region encompassing the
proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area,
according to the petitioner, includes
camel-backed bedrock landforms that
the Cascade Range alpine glaciers
eroded into the dominantly granitic
bedrock of the Lake Chelan area, lake
sediments that the alpine glaciers
deposited, and bedrock that consists of
Cretaceous-age igneous and older
metamorphic rocks. The glaciers
crushed bedrock in the Lake Chelan
region, creating glacial till and outwash
sediments that have coarse sandy
textures and that are rich in biotite
mica. The glacial lake sediments, silty to
clayey in texture, include substantive
amounts of quartz and mica. As a result,
the soil’s deep rooting zone for grape
vines has distinguishable textures,
mineralogy, and nutrients.
The petitioner provides a geologic
map of the proposed Lake Chelan
viticultural area from the USGS
Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map
I–1661, Geologic Map of the Chelan, 30Minute by 60-Minute Quadrangle,
Washington, accessed online on June
26, 2006. The map identifies the
Cretaceous-age bedrock and the
Quaternary-age surface sediments in the
Lake Chelan Valley area. The
Cretaceous-age units consist of dark,
intrusive igneous tonalites, the
petitioner explains. TTB notes that
tonalite is an igneous plutonic
(intrusive) rock having greater than 20
percent quartz and quartz diorite with 5
to 20 percent quartz. Also, the
Quaternary-age units consist of glacial
moraines, terraces, lake deposits, and
postglacial landslides and alluvial
sediments.
According to the petitioner, the
Columbia Plateau geologic history, in
contrast, stems from the force of a lobe
of the western Canadian ice sheet that
blocked the Clark Fork River in Idaho
and created the huge glacial Lake
Missoula in Montana. When the glacial
ice dams repeatedly failed, the largest
floods of water ever documented on
Earth occurred. The floods
overwhelmed the Columbia River and
flowed across eastern Washington,
eroding channels in the basalt bedrock
and depositing gravel bars in the main
basins and fine sandy and silty
sediments in the river valleys.
Geography
Elevations vary from approximately
1,100 feet at lake level to 3,276 feet at
an unnamed peak in the northwest
portion of the proposed Lake Chelan
viticultural area, 1.8 miles northwest of
Lake Chelan State Park on the USGS
Manson quadrangle map. The lower
elevations, which have gently rising
slopes, are along the southern and
eastern shoreline of Lake Chelan, as
shown on the USGS maps of the region.
The petitioner explains that the lower
lakeside elevations are known for
successful fruit growing. The higher
elevations enveloping the Lake Chelan
Valley region generally correlate with
steep terrain, as shown on the USGS
maps of the proposed viticultural area.
According to the petitioner, when the
Cascade alpine glaciers descended from
the mountain crests to lower elevations,
they created the distinctive U-shaped
Lake Chelan Valley topography,
including the lake depression. The term
‘‘camel-backed’’ describes the landforms
of the Lake Chelan Valley at low
elevations and adjacent surrounding
mountains. The Cascade alpine glaciers
created other valleys in the region with
similar landscapes, including camelbacked topography, and layers of glacial
sediment, but not lake basins. Thus,
only Lake Chelan Valley, in contrast to
the other regional glacial valleys, has a
climate-moderating lake effect.
Climate
According to local growers and
temperature statistics, a lake effect
moderates air temperature extremes in
both summer and winter in the
proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area.
The combination of moderating summer
high and winter low temperatures
creates a suitable environment for both
viticulture and tree fruit agriculture.
According to the petitioner, the strong
lake effect moderates the air
temperatures of planted areas adjacent
north and south of the eastern part of
the lake. In those areas, the waters of
Lake Chelan create a heat reservoir that
absorbs warming solar energy in
summer and then reradiates heat energy
into cold air in winter. The table below
compares the climate in the areas along
Lake Chelan to that in similar areas
nearby but without lakes.
tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES
CLIMATIC INDICES FOR WINE GRAPES FOR THREE SITES IN WASHINGTON STATE, 1994–2003
Area *
Distance
from Lake
Chelan
(miles)
Lake Chelan .......................................................................................................
0 ..................
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:08 Apr 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Cool climate
viticulture suitability index **
(days)
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
244
29APR1
Number of
days a year
<32 °F
89.6
Number of
days a year
>95 °F
7.1
19413
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
CLIMATIC INDICES FOR WINE GRAPES FOR THREE SITES IN WASHINGTON STATE, 1994–2003—Continued
Area *
Distance
from Lake
Chelan
(miles)
Methow Valley ....................................................................................................
Wenatchee Valley ..............................................................................................
Cool climate
viticulture suitability index **
(days)
30, north ......
30, south .....
176
230
Number of
days a year
<32 °F
147.9
102.3
Number of
days a year
>95 °F
13.6
14.1
tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES
* Based on data from the National Climate Data Center.
** Number of days between <29 °F in spring and the first temperature <29 °F in fall.
The petitioner uses a cool-climate
viticultural suitability index (CCVSI)
formulated at Cornell University as an
analytical tool for the Lake Chelan
Valley climate. The CCVSI emphasizes
the impact of temperature moderation
on viticulture. The petitioner explains
that the CCVSI compiles the sum of the
days from the last occurrence of 29
degrees Fahrenheit or lower in spring
until the first occurrence of 29 degrees
Fahrenheit or lower in fall. The larger
total numbers, in days, generally
correlate to the better viticultural
regions.
For the Lake Chelan Valley region, the
CCVSI 10-year average of 244 days is
significantly higher than the glacially
formed Methow Valley in the Cascade
Range to the north and higher than the
Wanatchee Valley to the south.
In another measure of the lake effect
on the proposed Lake Chelan
viticultural area, the petitioner uses the
annual average number of days with
temperatures of 32 degrees Fahrenheit
or lower in winter and 95 degrees
Fahrenheit or higher in summer. The
petitioner compares the climates in Lake
Chelan Valley, Methow Valley, and
Wenatchee Valley using this method.
All three valleys are located within 60
miles of each other, were created
partially or wholly by Cascade alpine
glaciers, and have other similar
geographic features. Lake Chelan Valley
averages 7 days a year above 95 degrees
Fahrenheit, and Methow Valley and
Wenatchee Valley average 14 days a
year, according to data from the
National Climate Data Center included
with the petition. Fewer hot days in the
Lake Chelan Valley correlate with better
fruit quality, because temperatures
above 95 degrees shut down most
photosynthesis in grapes, according to
the petitioner. The Lake Chelan Valley
averages only 90 days a year colder than
32 degrees Fahrenheit in winter, while
the Methow Valley averages 148 days
and the Wenatchee Valley averages 102
days.
Northwest of the proposed viticultural
area, temperatures are too low for
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:08 Apr 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
viticulture because of cold air drainage
from the high Cascades and severe
shading from steep mountainsides close
to the lake. To the east and northeast of
the proposed viticultural area, a ridge
holds the lake-affected air masses in the
lake basin. That ridge is used as the
proposed eastern boundary.
To further demonstrate the
moderating lake effect, the petitioner
provides evidence concerning vinekilling freezes which, according to the
petitioner, occur less frequently in the
proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area
than in other viticultural areas in
eastern Washington State. Winemaker
Charles Ray Sandidge III, in an October
2, 2006, e-mail to the petitioner, states
that he conducted a study of weather
data in the period 1934–84 in the
regions of Wahluke Slope, Walla Walla,
Chelan, East Wenatchee, and Roosevelt.
Results, based on cold temperature
readings, indicated that the Lake Chelan
area averaged a killing freeze once in 17
years, while the other Washington
viticultural areas studied averaged 6 to
8 years between vine-killing freezes.
Mr. Sandidge states that Lake Chelan
averages a heavy crop loss and a light
vine loss every 17 years. Also, fall
temperatures cool more rapidly and
rains arrive about a week earlier than in
areas to the south. Mr. Sandidge
theorizes that while the Lake Chelan
area experiences milder winter
temperatures, the later spring bud break
relates to the close proximity of the
proposed viticultural area to the
surrounding mountains.
Soils
According to the petitioner, the soils
of the Lake Chelan Valley include layers
of glacial debris, sediment from normal
stream erosion and deposition after the
glacial age, and airborne volcanic and
nonvolcanic sediments. The lower parts
of the deeper soils, 20 to 60 inches
below the surface, predominantly
formed in glacial sediments. The upper
part of the soils formed in a mixture of
large amounts of airborne volcanic
pumice and ash from Glacier Peak and
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
very small amounts of loess (windtransported material) overlying the
glacial sediments. Thus, the soils
downwind from Glacier Peak and the
north Cascades, including the soils in
the proposed Lake Chelan viticultural
area, are rich, about 3 to 40 percent by
volume, in volcanic pumice and ash
from a massive eruption of the Glacier
Peak volcano about 12,000 years ago.
The petitioner explains that bedrock
in the proposed Lake Chelan viticultural
area consists of Cretaceous-age granitic
rocks and older metamorphic rocks,
including amphibolite, schist, and
biotite gneiss. Glaciers shattered and
crushed the Cascade crystalline
bedrock, creating glacial till and glacial
outwash sediments that include biotite
mica-rich cobbly, bouldery, gravelly,
and coarse sandy materials.
The soils in Lake Chelan Valley that
are close to the surface, according to the
petitioner, include sand- and fine
gravel-sized pumice from the volcanic
eruption of Glacier Peak to the
northwest. Soils that have significant
amounts of volcanic ash and pumice or
clays weathered from glass have an
unusually high available water capacity.
The petitioner believes that the high
content of volcanic material in the soils
is a significant contributory factor to the
successful regional viticulture and
pomology over the past 100 years.
The United States Department of
Agriculture, National Cooperative Soil
Survey, has identified 11 soil series
within the proposed Lake Chelan
viticultural area. Eight of these series
consist of soils derived from volcanic
glass, including ashy, cindery,
pumiceous, glassy, vitrandic, medial,
and amorphic soils, the petitioner
explains. Only the Margerum and
Dragoon series are silt loam, which is
common on the Columbia Plateau. The
information in the soil table below is
from the Official Soil Series
Descriptions accessed on October 18,
2006, at the U.S. Department of
Agriculture Web site, at: https://
soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/
osd/.
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
19414
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Soil series
Soil order
Margerum ..............................................................
Chelan ...................................................................
Springdale .............................................................
Kartar .....................................................................
Entiat .....................................................................
Dinkelman .............................................................
Tyee ......................................................................
Swakane ................................................................
Psuga ....................................................................
Mansonia ...............................................................
Dragoon .................................................................
Mollisols ................................................................
Mollisols ................................................................
Inceptisols .............................................................
Inceptisols .............................................................
Mollisols ................................................................
Mollisols ................................................................
Mollisols ................................................................
Mollisols ................................................................
Spodosols .............................................................
Mollisols ................................................................
Mollisols ................................................................
The petitioner explains that many
agricultural soils on the Columbia
Plateau are silt loam throughout the soil
profile, and are unlike those with a high
content of volcanic pumice and ash in
the Lake Chelan area and Cascade
Range. Also, the mineralogy of the
Columbia Plateau basalt sediments,
deposited as alluvium derived from
basaltic lavas, includes neither quartz
nor mica, which are commonly found in
the sediments in the Lake Chelan Valley
area.
A sampling of soils taken by the
petitioner across the Columbia Plateau
shows that the dominant parent
materials are loess and dunes and have
an average content of only 12 percent
volcanic glass. This is substantially
different from the high glass content of
soils in the proposed viticultural area.
The Pasco and Umatilla Basins, to the
south of the proposed viticultural area,
were the origins of most of the loess
throughout the Columbia Plateau. Over
the millennia the Lake Chelan Valley,
outside the path of most of the wind
transporting the loess, has received only
minor deposits of loess. The petitioner
asserts that the differences in soil
between the Lake Chelan Valley and the
Columbia Plateau impact infiltration
and runoff of water, aeration of the soils,
root penetration, and available water
capacity.
tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and
Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 87
regarding the proposed Lake Chelan
viticultural area in the Federal Register
(73 FR 46836) on August 12, 2008. In
that notice, TTB invited comments by
October 14, 2008, from all interested
persons. We solicited comments on the
sufficiency and accuracy of the name,
boundary, climatic, and other required
information submitted in support of the
petition. We also solicited comments on
the proposal to identify ‘‘Lake Chelan’’
and ‘‘Chelan’’ as terms of viticultural
significance. We expressed particular
interest in receiving comments on
whether the proposed area name, Lake
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:08 Apr 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
Excerpt from official description
Chelan, would result in a conflict with
currently used brand names. We
received four comments from
individuals in response to that notice.
All four comments supported the
establishment of the Lake Chelan
viticultural area as proposed. Further,
TTB is not aware of any conflict with
existing brand labels that would occur
if the viticultural area is established as
proposed.
TTB Determination
When the Columbia Valley
viticultural area was established in
1984, it was recognized as having the
following distinguishing geographical
features: (1) A growing season of over
150 days per year, with a high of 204
days per year; (2) a total degree day
average of over 2,000; (3) annual rainfall
of 15 inches or less; and (4) a
topography described as a broadly
undulating or rolling surface, cut by
rivers and broken by long sloping
basaltic uplifts extending generally eastwest. Although the proposed Lake
Chelan viticultural area shares some of
these characteristics, due to lake effect
temperature moderation its growing
season is significantly longer at an
average of 244 days annually and its
lakeside topography is significantly
different. TTB believes these differences
justify recognition of Lake Chelan as a
distinct viticultural area within the
Columbia Valley viticultural area.
Accordingly, after careful review of
the petition and the comments received,
TTB finds that the evidence submitted
supports the establishment of the
proposed viticultural area. Therefore,
under the authority of the Federal
Alcohol Administration Act and part 4
of our regulations, we establish the
‘‘Lake Chelan’’ viticultural area in
Chelan County, Washington, effective
30 days from the publication date of this
document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative boundary
description of the viticultural area in the
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Considerable pumice.
Volcanic ash and pumice.
Volcanic ash in the upper part.
Volcanic ash in the surface.
Volcanic ash.
A component of volcanic ash.
Volcanic ash.
Volcanic ash in the upper part.
Volcanic ash.
Volcanic ash and pumice.
Volcanic ash.
regulatory text published at the end of
this document.
Maps
The maps for determining the
boundary of the viticultural area are
listed below in the regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits
any label reference on a wine that
indicates or implies an origin other than
the wine’s true place of origin. With the
establishment of this viticultural area
and its inclusion in part 9 of the TTB
regulations, its name, ‘‘Lake Chelan,’’ is
recognized under 27 CFR 4.39(i)(3) as a
name of viticultural significance. The
text of the new regulation clarifies this
point.
In addition, based on the evidence
submitted, we believe that ‘‘Chelan’’
standing alone is locally and/or
nationally known as referring to the
region in Washington State
encompassed by the proposed ‘‘Lake
Chelan’’ viticultural area, and we
therefore believe that consumers and
vintners could reasonably attribute the
quality, reputation, or other
characteristic of wine made from grapes
grown in the proposed ‘‘Lake Chelan’’
viticultural area to the name ‘‘Chelan’’
itself. Therefore, the part 9 regulatory
text set forth in this document specifies
both ‘‘Lake Chelan’’ and ‘‘Chelan’’ as
terms of viticultural significance for
purposes of part 4 of the TTB
regulations.
Once this final rule becomes effective,
wine bottlers using ‘‘Lake Chelan’’ or
‘‘Chelan’’ in a brand name, including a
trademark, or in another label reference
as to the origin of the wine, will have
to ensure that the product is eligible to
use the viticultural area’s full name as
an appellation of origin.
For a wine to be labeled with a
viticultural area name or with a brand
name that includes a viticultural area
name or other term identified as being
viticulturally significant in part 9 of the
TTB regulations, at least 85 percent of
the wine must be derived from grapes
grown within the area represented by
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
that name or other term, and the wine
must meet the other conditions listed in
27 CFR 4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not
eligible for labeling with the viticultural
area name or other viticulturally
significant term and that name or term
appears in the brand name, then the
label is not in compliance and the
bottler must change the brand name and
obtain approval of a new label.
Similarly, if the viticultural area name
or other viticulturally significant term
appears in another reference on the
label in a misleading manner, the bottler
would have to obtain approval of a new
label. Accordingly, if a previously
approved label uses the name ‘‘Lake
Chelan’’ or ‘‘Chelan’’ for a wine that
does not meet the 85 percent standard,
the previously approved label will be
subject to revocation, upon the effective
date of the establishment of the Lake
Chelan viticultural area.
Different rules apply if a wine has a
brand name containing a viticultural
area name or other term of viticultural
significance that was used as a brand
name on a label approved before July 7,
1986. See 27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that this regulation will not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
This regulation imposes no new
reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit
derived from the use of a viticultural
area name is the result of a proprietor’s
efforts and consumer acceptance of
wines from that area. Therefore, no
regulatory flexibility analysis is
required.
Executive Order 12866
This rule is not a significant
regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866. Therefore, it
requires no regulatory assessment.
Drafting Information
Christopher Thiemann of the
Regulations and Rulings Division
drafted this notice.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, we amend title 27 CFR,
chapter I, part 9, as follows:
tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES
■
PART 9—AMERICAN VITICULTURAL
AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 9
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:08 Apr 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
Subpart C—Approved American
Viticultural Areas
2. Subpart C is amended by adding
§ 9.215 to read as follows:
■
§ 9.215
Lake Chelan.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural
area described in this section is ‘‘Lake
Chelan’’. For purposes of part 4 of this
chapter, ‘‘Lake Chelan’’ and ‘‘Chelan’’
are terms of viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The five United
States Geological Survey 1:24,000 scale
topographic maps used to determine the
boundary of the Lake Chelan viticultural
area are titled:
(1) Manson Quadrangle,
Washington—Chelan Co., 1968,
photorevised 1987;
(2) Cooper Ridge Quadrangle—
Washington, 1968, photorevised 1987;
(3) Chelan Quadrangle—Washington,
1968, photorevised 1987;
(4) Chelan Falls Quadrangle—
Washington, 1968, photorevised 1981;
and
(5) Winesap Quadrangle—
Washington, 1968, photorevised 1987.
(c) Boundary. The Lake Chelan
viticultural area is located in Chelan
County, Washington. The boundary of
the Lake Chelan viticultural area is as
described below:
(1) The beginning point is on the
Manson map at the intersection of the
east shore of Lake Chelan and the north
boundary line of section 15, T28N/
R21E, north of Greens Landing. From
the beginning point, proceed straight
east 1.6 miles along the northern
boundary line of sections 15 and 4 to its
intersection with the 2,000-foot
elevation line, T28N/R21E; then
(2) Follow the meandering 2,000-foot
elevation line generally southeast onto
the Cooper Ridge map, crossing
Purtterman Gulch; continue southeast
onto the Chelan map and follow the
meandering 2,000-foot elevation line
onto the Chelan Falls map, over the
Cagle Gulch, and then return to the
Chelan map; continue generally
southeast onto the Chelan Falls map and
follow the 2,000-foot elevation line to
section 8, T27N/R23E, to a point 0.3
mile due north of BM 1404 at the
intersection of U.S. Route 97 and State
Route 151, T27N/R23E; then
(3) Proceed in a straight southsoutheast line 1.35 miles to its
intersection with the section 20 north
boundary line and the 1,000-foot
elevation line, T27N/R23E; then
(4) Proceed south-southwest along the
1,000-foot contour line to its
intersection with the section 20 south
boundary line, south of Chelan Station
and immediately west of State Route
151, T27N/R23E; then
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
19415
(5) Proceed straight west along the
south boundary line of sections 20 and
19 for 0.75 mile to its intersection with
the light-duty Gorge Road, as identified
on the adjoining Chelan map, T27N/
R23E; then
(6) Proceed northwest along Gorge
Road, crossing onto the Chelan map, to
the southeast corner of section 13,
T27N/R22E; then
(7) Proceed straight west along the
south boundary line of sections 13, 14,
15, 16, 17, and 18, and crossing onto the
Winesap map in section 18, to its
intersection with the R21E/R22E line,
T27N; then
(8) Proceed straight north along the
R21E/R22E line to its intersection with
the south boundary line of section 13
and the 2,440-foot contour line, T27N/
R21E; then
(9) Proceed straight west to the
southwest corner of section 13, T27N/
R21E; then
(10) Proceed straight north along the
section 14 east boundary line to the
northeast corner of section 14, T27N/
R21E; then
(11) Proceed straight west along the
section 14 north boundary line to the
northwest corner of section 14, T27N/
R21E; then
(12) Proceed straight north along the
east boundary line of section 10 for 0.3
mile to its intersection with the 2,520foot contour line and a 90-degree turn
in the Wenatchee National Forest (WNF)
boundary line, T27N/R21E; then
(13) Proceed straight west along the
WNF boundary line 0.3 mile to its
intersection with the 2,600-foot contour
line and a 90-degree turn in the WNF
boundary line, T27N/R21E; then
(14) Proceed straight south along the
WNF boundary line 0.3 mile to its
intersection with the south boundary
line of section 10, T27N/R21E; then
(15) Proceed straight west along the
south boundary lines of sections 10 and
9 to the southeast corner of section 8,
T27N/R21E; then
(16) Proceed straight north along the
east boundary line of section 8 to the
northeast corner of section 8, T27N/
R21E; then
(17) Proceed straight west along the
north boundary line of section 8 to the
northwest corner of section 8, T27N/
R21E; then
(18) Proceed generally north along the
east boundary line of section 6, crossing
onto the Manson map, and continue
along the east boundary lines of sections
31 and 30, to the northeast corner of
section 30, T28N/R21E; then
(19) Proceed straight east along the
north boundary lines of sections 29 and
28 to the intersection with the east
shoreline of Lake Chelan; and
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
19416
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 29, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
(20) Proceed generally northwest and
northeast along the east shoreline of
Lake Chelan to the point of beginning.
Signed: February 24, 2009.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: March 26, 2009.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Tax, Trade, and
Tariff Policy.
[FR Doc. E9–9847 Filed 4–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810–31–P
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Fiscal Service
31 CFR Part 363
Regulations Governing Securities Held
in TreasuryDirect
AGENCY: Bureau of the Public Debt,
Fiscal Service, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: TreasuryDirect is an accountbased, book-entry, online system for
purchasing, holding, and conducting
transactions in Treasury securities. To
date, TreasuryDirect has only been
available for individual account owners.
This final rule will permit certain
specified entities to open accounts in
TreasuryDirect.
Effective date: April 24, 2009.
You can download this final
rule at the following Internet addresses:
https://www.publicdebt.treas.gov or
https://www.gpoaccess.gov/ecfr.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Elisha Whipkey, Director, Division of
Program Administration, Office of Retail
Securities, Bureau of the Public Debt, at
(304) 480–6319 or
elisha.whipkey@bpd.treas.gov.
Susan Sharp, Attorney-Adviser,
Elizabeth Spears, Senior Attorney,
Edward Gronseth, Deputy Chief
Counsel, Office of the Chief Counsel,
Bureau of the Public Debt, at (304) 480–
8692 or susan.sharp@bpd.treas.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
TreasuryDirect is an online accountbased system for individuals to
purchase, hold, and conduct
transactions in eligible Treasury
securities. To date, only individuals
have been permitted to open a
TreasuryDirect account. This final rule
will permit certain specified entities to
open accounts in TreasuryDirect and
conduct transactions in eligible
Treasury securities. A sole
proprietorship, partnership,
corporation, limited liability company
DATES:
tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:08 Apr 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
or professional limited liability
company, trust, decedent’s estate, estate
of an incompetent individual, and estate
of a minor will be able to open a
TreasuryDirect account. Treasury
believes that these forms of registrations
will serve most organizations and
fiduciaries wishing to open a
TreasuryDirect account. If, in the future,
there is a demonstrated need for other
forms of entity registrations, Treasury
will consider adding additional
registrations.
The account must be opened and
managed by an individual known as an
entity account manager who is
authorized to act alone on behalf of the
entity with regard to this account. Only
an individual is permitted to act as an
entity account manager. Initially, the
entity account manager will be the
individual who opens the
TreasuryDirect account. If the entity
subsequently wishes to change the
individual who acts as its entity account
manager, the entity account manager
may be changed using procedures
available on the TreasuryDirect Web
site. Only one individual may act as
entity account manager at any one time.
The identity of the entity account
manager will be verified using an online
verification service; the identity of the
entity may be verified using appropriate
evidence. The entity account manager
must certify online that he or she has
the authority to act alone on behalf of
the entity.
An entity will not be permitted to
open a minor linked account. An entity
cannot purchase gift savings bonds, and
a gift bond cannot be delivered to an
entity. However, an entity may transfer
an existing bond, which is already
registered in the entity’s name, to
another account (primary or linked)
owned by either an individual or an
entity. An entity may convert a
definitive savings bond to book-entry
form if the bond is registered in the
name of the entity.
Procedural Requirements
This final rule does not meet the
criteria for a ‘‘significant regulatory
action’’ as defined in Executive Order
12866. Therefore, a regulatory
assessment is not required.
Because this final rule relates to
matters of public contract and
procedures for United States securities,
notice and public procedure and
delayed effective date requirements are
inapplicable, pursuant to 5 U.S.C.
553(a)(2).
As no notice of proposed rulemaking
is required, the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.) does not
apply.
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
We ask for no new collections of
information in this final rule. Therefore,
the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C.
3507) does not apply.
List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 363
Bonds, Electronic funds transfer,
Federal Reserve system, Government
securities, Securities.
■ Accordingly, for the reasons set out in
the preamble, 31 CFR Chapter II,
Subchapter B, is amended as follows:
PART 363—REGULATIONS
GOVERNING SECURITIES HELD IN
TREASURYDIRECT
1. The authority citation for part 363
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 5 U.S.C. 301; 12 U.S.C. 391; 31
U.S.C. 3102, et seq.; 31 U.S.C. 3121, et seq.
2. Amend § 363.5 by revising
paragraph (c) to read as follows:
■
§ 363.5
How do I contact Public Debt?
*
*
*
*
*
(c) Letters should be addressed to the
address provided on our web site at
https://www.treasurydirect.gov/
write.htm.
■ 3. Amend § 363.6 by:
■ a. Adding the definitions of ‘‘Entity,’’
‘‘Entity account manager,’’ and
‘‘Incompetent individual or
Incompentent person’’ in alphabetical
order;
■ b. Revising the definitions of
‘‘Individual,’’ ‘‘Owner,’’ ‘‘Person,’’ and
‘‘Verification’’ to read as follows:
§ 363.6 What special terms do I need to
know to understand this part?
*
*
*
*
*
Entity means any owner of a
TreasuryDirect account that is not an
individual. Entity is a sole
proprietorship, partnership,
corporation, limited liability company
or professional limited liability
company, trust, the estate of a decedent,
or the estate of a living person such as
an incompetent or a minor.
Entity account manager is the
individual who initially opens the
TreasuryDirect account for an entity, or
his or her replacement; who is
authorized by the entity to act alone on
its behalf to open, access, and conduct
transactions with respect to the account;
and who certifies that he or she is so
authorized.
*
*
*
*
*
Incompetent individual or
incompetent person means an
individual who has been declared by a
court to be legally incompetent,
incapacitated, or otherwise unable to
manage his or her financial affairs.
E:\FR\FM\29APR1.SGM
29APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 29, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 19409-19416]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9847]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau
27 CFR Part 9
[TTB Docket No. 2008-0006; T.D. TTB-76; Re: Notice No. 87]
RIN 1513-AB42
Establishment of the Lake Chelan Viticultural Area (2007R-103P)
AGENCY: Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, Treasury.
ACTION: Final rule; Treasury decision.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: This Treasury decision establishes the 24,040-acre ``Lake
Chelan'' American viticultural area in Chelan County, Washington. It
lies within the larger Columbia Valley viticultural area in north-
central Washington. We designate viticultural areas to allow vintners
to better describe the origin of their wines and to allow consumers to
better identify wines they may purchase.
DATES: Effective Date: May 29, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher Thiemann, Regulations and
Rulings Division, Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau, 1310 G
Street, NW., Room 200E, Washington, DC 20220; phone 202-927-8210.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
[[Page 19410]]
Background on Viticultural Areas
TTB Authority
Section 105(e) of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act (FAA Act),
27 U.S.C. 205(e), authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prescribe
regulations for the labeling of wine, distilled spirits, and malt
beverages. The FAA Act requires that these regulations, among other
things, prohibit consumer deception and the use of misleading
statements on labels, and ensure that labels provide the consumer with
adequate information as to the identity and quality of the product. The
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) administers the
regulations promulgated under the FAA Act.
Part 4 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 4) allows the
establishment of definitive viticultural areas and the use of their
names as appellations of origin on wine labels and in wine
advertisements. Part 9 of the TTB regulations (27 CFR part 9) contains
the list of approved viticultural areas.
Definition
Section 4.25(e)(1)(i) of the TTB regulations (27 CFR 4.25(e)(1)(i))
defines a viticultural area for American wine as a delimited grape-
growing region distinguishable by geographical features, the boundaries
of which have been recognized and defined in part 9 of the regulations.
These designations allow vintners and consumers to attribute a given
quality, reputation, or other characteristic of a wine made from grapes
grown in an area to its geographical origin. The establishment of
viticultural areas allows vintners to describe more accurately the
origin of their wines to consumers and helps consumers to identify
wines they may purchase. Establishment of a viticultural area is
neither an approval nor an endorsement by TTB of the wine produced in
that area.
Requirements
Section 4.25(e)(2) of the TTB regulations outlines the procedure
for proposing an American viticultural area and provides that any
interested party may petition TTB to establish a grape-growing region
as a viticultural area. Section 9.3(b) of the TTB regulations requires
the petition to include--
Evidence that the proposed viticultural area is locally
and/or nationally known by the name specified in the petition;
Historical or current evidence that supports setting the
boundary of the proposed viticultural area as the petition specifies;
Evidence relating to the geographical features, such as
climate, soils, elevation, and physical features, that distinguish the
proposed viticultural area from surrounding areas;
A description of the specific boundary of the proposed
viticultural area, based on features found on United States Geological
Survey (USGS) maps; and
A copy of the appropriate USGS map(s) with the proposed
viticultural area's boundary prominently marked.
Lake Chelan Petition
Alan J. Busacca, PhD, a geologist licensed in Washington State and
a nationally certified professional soil scientist with Vinitas
Vineyard Consultants, submitted a petition on behalf of the Lake Chelan
Wine Growers Association to establish the 24,040-acre Lake Chelan
American viticultural area in north-central Washington. Some of the
petition evidence and documentation provided relies on the previous
research and writings of Dr. Busacca. Additional petition resources
include Government-published climatic, topographic, and soils data, as
well as maps, municipal resources, commercial publications, personal
correspondence, and anecdotal information.
The Lake Chelan Valley lies about 112 miles east-northeast of
Seattle, according to USGS and commercial maps. The petitioner
explained that the proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area lies entirely
within the large, established Columbia Valley viticultural area (27 CFR
9.74). TTB notes that the Lake Chelan region lies to the east of the
Puget Sound viticultural area (27 CFR 9.151) and to the north of other
Washington State viticultural areas. The proposed Lake Chelan
viticultural area neither borders nor includes any portion of any other
Washington State viticultural area except the Columbia Valley
viticultural area.
The petitioner explained that the proposed Lake Chelan viticultural
area includes the southern and eastern portions of the large body of
water known as Lake Chelan and its surrounding lands suitable for
viticulture. According to the petitioner, at the time of the 2006
petition filing with TTB, the proposed viticultural area included 13
bonded wineries, 140 acres of vineyards, and another 50 acres to be
planted to grape vines.
According to the petitioner, distinguishing features of the
proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area include its geology, geography,
soils, and climate as directly influenced by past alpine glacial
activity of the Cascade region. Lake Chelan Valley is the only valley
in the Cascade Range in Oregon or Washington that holds a natural lake
of its size. The climate of the agricultural and viticultural lands
surrounding the lower (eastern) end of the lake is strongly moderated
by the thermal effect of the lake on the air temperatures. The glacier
that formed during the last ice age and traveled from the Cascade crest
to the eastern end of the modern lake left a defining imprint on the
landforms of the Lake Chelan Valley. In addition, the petitioner
claimed that pumice and ash from eruptions of volcanoes in the Cascade
Range, principally Glacier Peak to the west of the proposed
viticultural area, formed soils that are ashier and more pumiceous than
those in any other established viticultural area in Washington State.
We summarize below the supporting evidence submitted with the
petition.
Name Evidence
The ``Chelan'' geographic name derives from the name that Alexander
Ross, an American fur trader, in about 1824 used to describe the
``Tsill-anes,'' a native people living along the south shore of Lake
Chelan, according to ``Chelan County--Thumbnail History,'' an article
from the Washington State Department of Archeology and Historic
Preservation, The Online Encyclopedia of Washington State History at
https://www.historylink.org.
The ``Lake Chelan'' name appears on the USGS Chelan, Manson, and
Winesap quadrangle maps. The USGS Chelan map, sections 11 and 12, T27N
and R23N, identifies an area to the north-northwest of the small town
of Chelan as the ``Lake Chelan Golf and Country Club.'' The DeLorme
Washington Atlas and Gazetteer identifies ``Lake Chelan'' on page 83,
sections A7, B7, and B8. The American Automobile Association map,
Oregon Washington State Series, identifies ``Lake Chelan'' as a long
slender lake extending northwest from the North Cascades National Park
southeast to the Chelan Dam, approximately 2 miles northwest of the
Columbia River.
An article entitled ``Chelan and Stehekin, WA,'' dated August 12,
2006, on https://www.nwsource.com, a northwest travel and outdoors Web
site, states that Lake Chelan is one of Washington's favorite summer
recreation areas.
Boundary Evidence
According to the petitioner and the written boundary description,
the proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area encompasses the southernmost
and easternmost 12 miles of the 55-mile-long lake and surrounding
lands. A bedrock
[[Page 19411]]
ridge, with a pinnacle at a 1,526-foot elevation, divides the
approximately 1,200-foot elevation of the south Lake Chelan region from
the 707-foot elevation of the Columbia River, according to USGS maps of
the area and the petitioner. Lands to the east and southeast of the
proposed viticultural area are within the Columbia River airshed and
watershed, and have different climates, geology, and soils.
The upper 43 miles of Lake Chelan and its shoreline lie outside of
the proposed viticultural area, according to the written boundary
description provided in the petition. According to the petitioner, in
the northern lake region the surrounding Cascade Range provides
significant downward cold air drainage from peaks to valley floor and
blocks the sun from the adjacent valley lands. The cold air and shade
combine with a steep shoreline terrain to create a region unsuitable
for grape growing. Additionally, the North Cascades National Park
surrounds the north end of Lake Chelan, and commercial agricultural
development is prohibited within its borders.
Lands with viticultural potential in the Lake Chelan Valley area,
the petitioner states, are generally at or below 2,000 feet in
elevation. High mountains ridges, beyond the boundary of the proposed
Lake Chelan viticultural area, rise over 5,000 feet in elevation to the
north and west and to 3,800 feet to the south, cradling the Lake Chelan
Valley region on three sides, according to the petitioner and USGS
maps. The petition explains that these high mountains, which have cold
climates and forested terrain, are unsuited to viticulture.
History of Viticulture
According to the Chelan Valley Mirror dated May 1, 1947, Urban
DeGrassi, a Jesuit priest, spent several years in the Lake Chelan
region teaching Native Americans about agriculture. Based on Father
DeGrassi's teachings, in 1881, John and Peter Wapato, Native Americans
of Chelan Valley, started planting fruit eventually including grapes
and cherries.
According to an article in the August 6, 1891, edition of the
Chelan Falls Leader, Louis Conti, an Italian immigrant, owned a 60-acre
vineyard in the Lake Chelan area. The article stated that a colony of
Italian immigrants, living on the sunnier south side of the lake,
planted grape vines on their claimed lands.
Two 1905 photographs from the Chelan County Historical Society show
grapes growing in the Lake Chelan area. A photo of grapes on the vine
is labeled ``Black Hamburg Grapes--Lake Chelan.'' The petitioner
explains that the common name for those grapes is Black Muscat. The
other photo, which shows a little boy sitting on the ground beside
grapes hanging heavily from a vine, is labeled ``Lake Chelan Grapes.''
The Faletto family continued growing grapes into the early 1900's,
according to an e-mail dated November 22, 2005, from family member Rich
Faletto. Mr. Faletto stated of his grandfather, ``Old John was the
vintner and winery operator in the valley, producing great wine from
[grapevines] brought to the area by a group of Italians.''
The Chelan and Manson areas, within the proposed viticultural area,
comprised 154 acres of producing vineyards, according to a November 17,
1949, newspaper article written by Harry R. McMullen. According to the
article, that year grape growers received 2 cents a pound, or $40 a
ton, from the Welch Company.
Modern Viticulture
The petitioner states that in 1998, Steve Kludt and Bob Christopher
replanted apple orchards to grapes within the proposed Lake Chelan
viticultural area. Also, in 2000 the Kludt family opened the first
bonded winery in the area and in 2001 started selling wine. Vineyard
production in the Lake Chelan region increased from over 90 acres in
2004 to 140 acres by 2006. According to the petitioner, 13 bonded
wineries operated in the Lake Chelan area as of the 2006 petition
submission date.
Proposed Boundary Line
The petitioner explains that the proposed boundary line uses a
2,000-foot elevation line and USGS map section lines in conjunction
with roads, mountain peaks, and other map markings in providing a
clear, simple perimeter. The proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area
boundary line includes lands adjacent to the southernmost 12 miles of
the lake, according to the petition.
In determining the proposed boundary line, the petitioner included
in the proposed viticultural area only the valley areas with a
significant ``lake effect'' climate. The lake affects surrounding
lands, the petitioner explains, by favorably moderating the climate,
increasing the length of the growing season, and reducing the frequency
of damaging or killing vine freezes. The petitioner states that the
proposed boundary line excludes from the proposed viticultural area the
surrounding mountainous areas and the northern 43 miles of the lake and
adjacent lands, all unsuitable for viticulture.
TTB notes that the northeast portion of the boundary of the
proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area coincides with 17 miles of the
2,000-foot boundary line of the Columbia Valley viticultural area. When
the petition was first submitted to TTB, the proposed northeast
boundary line incorporated a series of map section lines and 90-degree
turns. After discussions with TTB, the petitioner modified the
northeast portion of the boundary line to coincide with the boundary
line of the Columbia Valley viticultural area.
The petitioner provides an aerial photo of agriculture within and
immediately outside of the proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area. The
planted orchards and vineyards are clustered on the low, flat
elevations adjoining the northern and southern shorelines of the lake.
The petitioner explains that viticulture fails to thrive outside the
proposed boundary line because of high elevations, steep terrain, cold
temperatures, and the absence of a moderating lake-effect climate.
Other boundary line considerations include properties of the soil,
the influences of the watershed and airshed, the elevations of the
surrounding mountains, and the steepness of the terrain.
Distinguishing Features
Cascade Range Geographic Province
The proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area, a part of the Cascade
Range geographic province, the petitioner explains, includes
distinctive geology, geography, soils, and climate that contrast to
those of the surrounding areas. The geology, the petitioner notes,
includes the advance of Cascade alpine glaciers that occurred 14,000 to
18,000 years ago.
The Cascade Mountain Range runs north-south through Washington and
Oregon and divides western and eastern Washington, the petitioner
explains. The range creates, to the east, a rain shadow that limits
precipitation in the Lake Chelan Valley and on the Columbia Plateau in
eastern Washington. The range protects areas to its east from Arctic
and Pacific winter storms and further moderates climate.
Lake Chelan Valley is the only valley that the Cascade glacier
created in Washington and Oregon and that holds a large natural lake of
Lake Chelan's size. The lake is the third deepest lake in the U.S., the
petitioner emphasizes. The soils in the valley formed in glacial
sediments layered below the more recent windblown deposition of
[[Page 19412]]
volcanic pumice and ash. Also, the large glacial lake acts as a heat
reservoir to produce a unique climate of consistently moderated
temperatures.
Columbia Plateau Geographic Province
Most Washington vineyards, the petitioner states, lie on the
Columbia Plateau geographic province, the features of which contrast
significantly in several important ways from the Lake Chelan Valley in
the Cascade Range geographic province. The distinguishing features of
the Columbia Plateau include the bedrock of Tertiary-age basaltic
lavas, sediments derived from cataclysmic outburst floods of Lake
Missoula, and bench-and-riser landforms that the recurrent Missoula
Floods created through erosion of the lavas. The topography varies from
near moonscapes to megasized gravel bars and slackwater terraces.
The petitioner states that another distinguishing feature of the
Columbia Plateau is the predominant east-west trending valley-and-ridge
system that affects the elevation, slope, aspect, heat accumulation,
winds, and air drainage of the plateau. Also, plateau elevations vary
from 460 feet at the Wahluke Slope viticultural area (27 CFR 9.192) to
970 feet at the Walla Walla Valley viticultural area (27 CFR 9.91), a
topography with a significantly lower elevation than that of the Lake
Chelan area of the Cascade Range.
The separate climates of the Columbia Plateau viticultural areas
share low winter temperatures with complete vine dormancy and
significant fall daytime and nighttime temperature variations. The
viticultural areas of the Columbia Plateau lie within the rain shadow
of the Cascade Range, and have a drier climate as compared to western
Washington. The combination of distinguishing features in the
viticultural areas on the Columbia Plateau, the petitioner concludes,
creates a unique annual growing season that contrasts with the Lake
Chelan Valley region in the Cascade Range geographic province.
Geology
The petitioner explains that the most recent ice-age events of the
Earth, 14,000 to 18,000 years ago, played significant roles in creating
the differing geological records within the Cascade Range and the
Columbia Plateau.
The region encompassing the proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area,
according to the petitioner, includes camel-backed bedrock landforms
that the Cascade Range alpine glaciers eroded into the dominantly
granitic bedrock of the Lake Chelan area, lake sediments that the
alpine glaciers deposited, and bedrock that consists of Cretaceous-age
igneous and older metamorphic rocks. The glaciers crushed bedrock in
the Lake Chelan region, creating glacial till and outwash sediments
that have coarse sandy textures and that are rich in biotite mica. The
glacial lake sediments, silty to clayey in texture, include substantive
amounts of quartz and mica. As a result, the soil's deep rooting zone
for grape vines has distinguishable textures, mineralogy, and
nutrients.
The petitioner provides a geologic map of the proposed Lake Chelan
viticultural area from the USGS Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map
I-1661, Geologic Map of the Chelan, 30-Minute by 60-Minute Quadrangle,
Washington, accessed online on June 26, 2006. The map identifies the
Cretaceous-age bedrock and the Quaternary-age surface sediments in the
Lake Chelan Valley area. The Cretaceous-age units consist of dark,
intrusive igneous tonalites, the petitioner explains. TTB notes that
tonalite is an igneous plutonic (intrusive) rock having greater than 20
percent quartz and quartz diorite with 5 to 20 percent quartz. Also,
the Quaternary-age units consist of glacial moraines, terraces, lake
deposits, and postglacial landslides and alluvial sediments.
According to the petitioner, the Columbia Plateau geologic history,
in contrast, stems from the force of a lobe of the western Canadian ice
sheet that blocked the Clark Fork River in Idaho and created the huge
glacial Lake Missoula in Montana. When the glacial ice dams repeatedly
failed, the largest floods of water ever documented on Earth occurred.
The floods overwhelmed the Columbia River and flowed across eastern
Washington, eroding channels in the basalt bedrock and depositing
gravel bars in the main basins and fine sandy and silty sediments in
the river valleys.
Geography
Elevations vary from approximately 1,100 feet at lake level to
3,276 feet at an unnamed peak in the northwest portion of the proposed
Lake Chelan viticultural area, 1.8 miles northwest of Lake Chelan State
Park on the USGS Manson quadrangle map. The lower elevations, which
have gently rising slopes, are along the southern and eastern shoreline
of Lake Chelan, as shown on the USGS maps of the region. The petitioner
explains that the lower lakeside elevations are known for successful
fruit growing. The higher elevations enveloping the Lake Chelan Valley
region generally correlate with steep terrain, as shown on the USGS
maps of the proposed viticultural area.
According to the petitioner, when the Cascade alpine glaciers
descended from the mountain crests to lower elevations, they created
the distinctive U-shaped Lake Chelan Valley topography, including the
lake depression. The term ``camel-backed'' describes the landforms of
the Lake Chelan Valley at low elevations and adjacent surrounding
mountains. The Cascade alpine glaciers created other valleys in the
region with similar landscapes, including camel-backed topography, and
layers of glacial sediment, but not lake basins. Thus, only Lake Chelan
Valley, in contrast to the other regional glacial valleys, has a
climate-moderating lake effect.
Climate
According to local growers and temperature statistics, a lake
effect moderates air temperature extremes in both summer and winter in
the proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area. The combination of
moderating summer high and winter low temperatures creates a suitable
environment for both viticulture and tree fruit agriculture. According
to the petitioner, the strong lake effect moderates the air
temperatures of planted areas adjacent north and south of the eastern
part of the lake. In those areas, the waters of Lake Chelan create a
heat reservoir that absorbs warming solar energy in summer and then
reradiates heat energy into cold air in winter. The table below
compares the climate in the areas along Lake Chelan to that in similar
areas nearby but without lakes.
Climatic Indices for Wine Grapes for Three Sites in Washington State, 1994-2003
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cool climate
viticulture Number of days Number of days
Area * Distance from Lake Chelan suitability a year <32 a year >95
(miles) index ** [deg]F [deg]F
(days)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lake Chelan.......................... 0........................ 244 89.6 7.1
[[Page 19413]]
Methow Valley........................ 30, north................ 176 147.9 13.6
Wenatchee Valley..................... 30, south................ 230 102.3 14.1
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Based on data from the National Climate Data Center.
** Number of days between <29 [deg]F in spring and the first temperature <29 [deg]F in fall.
The petitioner uses a cool-climate viticultural suitability index
(CCVSI) formulated at Cornell University as an analytical tool for the
Lake Chelan Valley climate. The CCVSI emphasizes the impact of
temperature moderation on viticulture. The petitioner explains that the
CCVSI compiles the sum of the days from the last occurrence of 29
degrees Fahrenheit or lower in spring until the first occurrence of 29
degrees Fahrenheit or lower in fall. The larger total numbers, in days,
generally correlate to the better viticultural regions.
For the Lake Chelan Valley region, the CCVSI 10-year average of 244
days is significantly higher than the glacially formed Methow Valley in
the Cascade Range to the north and higher than the Wanatchee Valley to
the south.
In another measure of the lake effect on the proposed Lake Chelan
viticultural area, the petitioner uses the annual average number of
days with temperatures of 32 degrees Fahrenheit or lower in winter and
95 degrees Fahrenheit or higher in summer. The petitioner compares the
climates in Lake Chelan Valley, Methow Valley, and Wenatchee Valley
using this method. All three valleys are located within 60 miles of
each other, were created partially or wholly by Cascade alpine
glaciers, and have other similar geographic features. Lake Chelan
Valley averages 7 days a year above 95 degrees Fahrenheit, and Methow
Valley and Wenatchee Valley average 14 days a year, according to data
from the National Climate Data Center included with the petition. Fewer
hot days in the Lake Chelan Valley correlate with better fruit quality,
because temperatures above 95 degrees shut down most photosynthesis in
grapes, according to the petitioner. The Lake Chelan Valley averages
only 90 days a year colder than 32 degrees Fahrenheit in winter, while
the Methow Valley averages 148 days and the Wenatchee Valley averages
102 days.
Northwest of the proposed viticultural area, temperatures are too
low for viticulture because of cold air drainage from the high Cascades
and severe shading from steep mountainsides close to the lake. To the
east and northeast of the proposed viticultural area, a ridge holds the
lake-affected air masses in the lake basin. That ridge is used as the
proposed eastern boundary.
To further demonstrate the moderating lake effect, the petitioner
provides evidence concerning vine-killing freezes which, according to
the petitioner, occur less frequently in the proposed Lake Chelan
viticultural area than in other viticultural areas in eastern
Washington State. Winemaker Charles Ray Sandidge III, in an October 2,
2006, e-mail to the petitioner, states that he conducted a study of
weather data in the period 1934-84 in the regions of Wahluke Slope,
Walla Walla, Chelan, East Wenatchee, and Roosevelt. Results, based on
cold temperature readings, indicated that the Lake Chelan area averaged
a killing freeze once in 17 years, while the other Washington
viticultural areas studied averaged 6 to 8 years between vine-killing
freezes.
Mr. Sandidge states that Lake Chelan averages a heavy crop loss and
a light vine loss every 17 years. Also, fall temperatures cool more
rapidly and rains arrive about a week earlier than in areas to the
south. Mr. Sandidge theorizes that while the Lake Chelan area
experiences milder winter temperatures, the later spring bud break
relates to the close proximity of the proposed viticultural area to the
surrounding mountains.
Soils
According to the petitioner, the soils of the Lake Chelan Valley
include layers of glacial debris, sediment from normal stream erosion
and deposition after the glacial age, and airborne volcanic and
nonvolcanic sediments. The lower parts of the deeper soils, 20 to 60
inches below the surface, predominantly formed in glacial sediments.
The upper part of the soils formed in a mixture of large amounts of
airborne volcanic pumice and ash from Glacier Peak and very small
amounts of loess (wind-transported material) overlying the glacial
sediments. Thus, the soils downwind from Glacier Peak and the north
Cascades, including the soils in the proposed Lake Chelan viticultural
area, are rich, about 3 to 40 percent by volume, in volcanic pumice and
ash from a massive eruption of the Glacier Peak volcano about 12,000
years ago.
The petitioner explains that bedrock in the proposed Lake Chelan
viticultural area consists of Cretaceous-age granitic rocks and older
metamorphic rocks, including amphibolite, schist, and biotite gneiss.
Glaciers shattered and crushed the Cascade crystalline bedrock,
creating glacial till and glacial outwash sediments that include
biotite mica-rich cobbly, bouldery, gravelly, and coarse sandy
materials.
The soils in Lake Chelan Valley that are close to the surface,
according to the petitioner, include sand- and fine gravel-sized pumice
from the volcanic eruption of Glacier Peak to the northwest. Soils that
have significant amounts of volcanic ash and pumice or clays weathered
from glass have an unusually high available water capacity. The
petitioner believes that the high content of volcanic material in the
soils is a significant contributory factor to the successful regional
viticulture and pomology over the past 100 years.
The United States Department of Agriculture, National Cooperative
Soil Survey, has identified 11 soil series within the proposed Lake
Chelan viticultural area. Eight of these series consist of soils
derived from volcanic glass, including ashy, cindery, pumiceous,
glassy, vitrandic, medial, and amorphic soils, the petitioner explains.
Only the Margerum and Dragoon series are silt loam, which is common on
the Columbia Plateau. The information in the soil table below is from
the Official Soil Series Descriptions accessed on October 18, 2006, at
the U.S. Department of Agriculture Web site, at: https://soils.usda.gov/technical/classification/osd/.
[[Page 19414]]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Soil series Soil order Excerpt from official description
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margerum......................... Mollisols........... Considerable pumice.
Chelan........................... Mollisols........... Volcanic ash and pumice.
Springdale....................... Inceptisols......... Volcanic ash in the upper part.
Kartar........................... Inceptisols......... Volcanic ash in the surface.
Entiat........................... Mollisols........... Volcanic ash.
Dinkelman........................ Mollisols........... A component of volcanic ash.
Tyee............................. Mollisols........... Volcanic ash.
Swakane.......................... Mollisols........... Volcanic ash in the upper part.
Psuga............................ Spodosols........... Volcanic ash.
Mansonia......................... Mollisols........... Volcanic ash and pumice.
Dragoon.......................... Mollisols........... Volcanic ash.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The petitioner explains that many agricultural soils on the
Columbia Plateau are silt loam throughout the soil profile, and are
unlike those with a high content of volcanic pumice and ash in the Lake
Chelan area and Cascade Range. Also, the mineralogy of the Columbia
Plateau basalt sediments, deposited as alluvium derived from basaltic
lavas, includes neither quartz nor mica, which are commonly found in
the sediments in the Lake Chelan Valley area.
A sampling of soils taken by the petitioner across the Columbia
Plateau shows that the dominant parent materials are loess and dunes
and have an average content of only 12 percent volcanic glass. This is
substantially different from the high glass content of soils in the
proposed viticultural area. The Pasco and Umatilla Basins, to the south
of the proposed viticultural area, were the origins of most of the
loess throughout the Columbia Plateau. Over the millennia the Lake
Chelan Valley, outside the path of most of the wind transporting the
loess, has received only minor deposits of loess. The petitioner
asserts that the differences in soil between the Lake Chelan Valley and
the Columbia Plateau impact infiltration and runoff of water, aeration
of the soils, root penetration, and available water capacity.
Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Comments Received
TTB published Notice No. 87 regarding the proposed Lake Chelan
viticultural area in the Federal Register (73 FR 46836) on August 12,
2008. In that notice, TTB invited comments by October 14, 2008, from
all interested persons. We solicited comments on the sufficiency and
accuracy of the name, boundary, climatic, and other required
information submitted in support of the petition. We also solicited
comments on the proposal to identify ``Lake Chelan'' and ``Chelan'' as
terms of viticultural significance. We expressed particular interest in
receiving comments on whether the proposed area name, Lake Chelan,
would result in a conflict with currently used brand names. We received
four comments from individuals in response to that notice. All four
comments supported the establishment of the Lake Chelan viticultural
area as proposed. Further, TTB is not aware of any conflict with
existing brand labels that would occur if the viticultural area is
established as proposed.
TTB Determination
When the Columbia Valley viticultural area was established in 1984,
it was recognized as having the following distinguishing geographical
features: (1) A growing season of over 150 days per year, with a high
of 204 days per year; (2) a total degree day average of over 2,000; (3)
annual rainfall of 15 inches or less; and (4) a topography described as
a broadly undulating or rolling surface, cut by rivers and broken by
long sloping basaltic uplifts extending generally east-west. Although
the proposed Lake Chelan viticultural area shares some of these
characteristics, due to lake effect temperature moderation its growing
season is significantly longer at an average of 244 days annually and
its lakeside topography is significantly different. TTB believes these
differences justify recognition of Lake Chelan as a distinct
viticultural area within the Columbia Valley viticultural area.
Accordingly, after careful review of the petition and the comments
received, TTB finds that the evidence submitted supports the
establishment of the proposed viticultural area. Therefore, under the
authority of the Federal Alcohol Administration Act and part 4 of our
regulations, we establish the ``Lake Chelan'' viticultural area in
Chelan County, Washington, effective 30 days from the publication date
of this document.
Boundary Description
See the narrative boundary description of the viticultural area in
the regulatory text published at the end of this document.
Maps
The maps for determining the boundary of the viticultural area are
listed below in the regulatory text.
Impact on Current Wine Labels
Part 4 of the TTB regulations prohibits any label reference on a
wine that indicates or implies an origin other than the wine's true
place of origin. With the establishment of this viticultural area and
its inclusion in part 9 of the TTB regulations, its name, ``Lake
Chelan,'' is recognized under 27 CFR 4.39(i)(3) as a name of
viticultural significance. The text of the new regulation clarifies
this point.
In addition, based on the evidence submitted, we believe that
``Chelan'' standing alone is locally and/or nationally known as
referring to the region in Washington State encompassed by the proposed
``Lake Chelan'' viticultural area, and we therefore believe that
consumers and vintners could reasonably attribute the quality,
reputation, or other characteristic of wine made from grapes grown in
the proposed ``Lake Chelan'' viticultural area to the name ``Chelan''
itself. Therefore, the part 9 regulatory text set forth in this
document specifies both ``Lake Chelan'' and ``Chelan'' as terms of
viticultural significance for purposes of part 4 of the TTB
regulations.
Once this final rule becomes effective, wine bottlers using ``Lake
Chelan'' or ``Chelan'' in a brand name, including a trademark, or in
another label reference as to the origin of the wine, will have to
ensure that the product is eligible to use the viticultural area's full
name as an appellation of origin.
For a wine to be labeled with a viticultural area name or with a
brand name that includes a viticultural area name or other term
identified as being viticulturally significant in part 9 of the TTB
regulations, at least 85 percent of the wine must be derived from
grapes grown within the area represented by
[[Page 19415]]
that name or other term, and the wine must meet the other conditions
listed in 27 CFR 4.25(e)(3). If the wine is not eligible for labeling
with the viticultural area name or other viticulturally significant
term and that name or term appears in the brand name, then the label is
not in compliance and the bottler must change the brand name and obtain
approval of a new label. Similarly, if the viticultural area name or
other viticulturally significant term appears in another reference on
the label in a misleading manner, the bottler would have to obtain
approval of a new label. Accordingly, if a previously approved label
uses the name ``Lake Chelan'' or ``Chelan'' for a wine that does not
meet the 85 percent standard, the previously approved label will be
subject to revocation, upon the effective date of the establishment of
the Lake Chelan viticultural area.
Different rules apply if a wine has a brand name containing a
viticultural area name or other term of viticultural significance that
was used as a brand name on a label approved before July 7, 1986. See
27 CFR 4.39(i)(2) for details.
Regulatory Flexibility Act
We certify that this regulation will not have a significant
economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. This
regulation imposes no new reporting, recordkeeping, or other
administrative requirement. Any benefit derived from the use of a
viticultural area name is the result of a proprietor's efforts and
consumer acceptance of wines from that area. Therefore, no regulatory
flexibility analysis is required.
Executive Order 12866
This rule is not a significant regulatory action as defined by
Executive Order 12866. Therefore, it requires no regulatory assessment.
Drafting Information
Christopher Thiemann of the Regulations and Rulings Division
drafted this notice.
List of Subjects in 27 CFR Part 9
Wine.
The Regulatory Amendment
0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, we amend title 27 CFR,
chapter I, part 9, as follows:
PART 9--AMERICAN VITICULTURAL AREAS
0
1. The authority citation for part 9 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 27 U.S.C. 205.
Subpart C--Approved American Viticultural Areas
0
2. Subpart C is amended by adding Sec. 9.215 to read as follows:
Sec. 9.215 Lake Chelan.
(a) Name. The name of the viticultural area described in this
section is ``Lake Chelan''. For purposes of part 4 of this chapter,
``Lake Chelan'' and ``Chelan'' are terms of viticultural significance.
(b) Approved maps. The five United States Geological Survey
1:24,000 scale topographic maps used to determine the boundary of the
Lake Chelan viticultural area are titled:
(1) Manson Quadrangle, Washington--Chelan Co., 1968, photorevised
1987;
(2) Cooper Ridge Quadrangle--Washington, 1968, photorevised 1987;
(3) Chelan Quadrangle--Washington, 1968, photorevised 1987;
(4) Chelan Falls Quadrangle--Washington, 1968, photorevised 1981;
and
(5) Winesap Quadrangle--Washington, 1968, photorevised 1987.
(c) Boundary. The Lake Chelan viticultural area is located in
Chelan County, Washington. The boundary of the Lake Chelan viticultural
area is as described below:
(1) The beginning point is on the Manson map at the intersection of
the east shore of Lake Chelan and the north boundary line of section
15, T28N/R21E, north of Greens Landing. From the beginning point,
proceed straight east 1.6 miles along the northern boundary line of
sections 15 and 4 to its intersection with the 2,000-foot elevation
line, T28N/R21E; then
(2) Follow the meandering 2,000-foot elevation line generally
southeast onto the Cooper Ridge map, crossing Purtterman Gulch;
continue southeast onto the Chelan map and follow the meandering 2,000-
foot elevation line onto the Chelan Falls map, over the Cagle Gulch,
and then return to the Chelan map; continue generally southeast onto
the Chelan Falls map and follow the 2,000-foot elevation line to
section 8, T27N/R23E, to a point 0.3 mile due north of BM 1404 at the
intersection of U.S. Route 97 and State Route 151, T27N/R23E; then
(3) Proceed in a straight south-southeast line 1.35 miles to its
intersection with the section 20 north boundary line and the 1,000-foot
elevation line, T27N/R23E; then
(4) Proceed south-southwest along the 1,000-foot contour line to
its intersection with the section 20 south boundary line, south of
Chelan Station and immediately west of State Route 151, T27N/R23E; then
(5) Proceed straight west along the south boundary line of sections
20 and 19 for 0.75 mile to its intersection with the light-duty Gorge
Road, as identified on the adjoining Chelan map, T27N/R23E; then
(6) Proceed northwest along Gorge Road, crossing onto the Chelan
map, to the southeast corner of section 13, T27N/R22E; then
(7) Proceed straight west along the south boundary line of sections
13, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18, and crossing onto the Winesap map in
section 18, to its intersection with the R21E/R22E line, T27N; then
(8) Proceed straight north along the R21E/R22E line to its
intersection with the south boundary line of section 13 and the 2,440-
foot contour line, T27N/R21E; then
(9) Proceed straight west to the southwest corner of section 13,
T27N/R21E; then
(10) Proceed straight north along the section 14 east boundary line
to the northeast corner of section 14, T27N/R21E; then
(11) Proceed straight west along the section 14 north boundary line
to the northwest corner of section 14, T27N/R21E; then
(12) Proceed straight north along the east boundary line of section
10 for 0.3 mile to its intersection with the 2,520-foot contour line
and a 90-degree turn in the Wenatchee National Forest (WNF) boundary
line, T27N/R21E; then
(13) Proceed straight west along the WNF boundary line 0.3 mile to
its intersection with the 2,600-foot contour line and a 90-degree turn
in the WNF boundary line, T27N/R21E; then
(14) Proceed straight south along the WNF boundary line 0.3 mile to
its intersection with the south boundary line of section 10, T27N/R21E;
then
(15) Proceed straight west along the south boundary lines of
sections 10 and 9 to the southeast corner of section 8, T27N/R21E; then
(16) Proceed straight north along the east boundary line of section
8 to the northeast corner of section 8, T27N/R21E; then
(17) Proceed straight west along the north boundary line of section
8 to the northwest corner of section 8, T27N/R21E; then
(18) Proceed generally north along the east boundary line of
section 6, crossing onto the Manson map, and continue along the east
boundary lines of sections 31 and 30, to the northeast corner of
section 30, T28N/R21E; then
(19) Proceed straight east along the north boundary lines of
sections 29 and 28 to the intersection with the east shoreline of Lake
Chelan; and
[[Page 19416]]
(20) Proceed generally northwest and northeast along the east
shoreline of Lake Chelan to the point of beginning.
Signed: February 24, 2009.
John J. Manfreda,
Administrator.
Approved: March 26, 2009.
Timothy E. Skud,
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Tax, Trade, and Tariff Policy.
[FR Doc. E9-9847 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4810-31-P