Amended Notice of Intent To Modify the Scope of the Environmental Impact Statement for the Abengoa Biorefinery Project Near Hugoton, KS, 19543-19546 [E9-9716]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 29, 2009 / Notices
(2) A mail receipt that is not dated by
the U.S. Postal Service.
If your application is postmarked after
the application deadline date, we will
not consider your application.
Note: The U.S. Postal Service does not
uniformly provide a dated postmark. Before
relying on this method, you should check
with your local post office.
c. Submission of Paper Applications
by Hand Delivery.
If you qualify for an exception to the
electronic submission requirement, you
(or a courier service) may deliver your
paper application to the Department by
hand. You must deliver the original and
two copies of your application, by hand,
on or before the application deadline
date, to the Department at the following
address: U.S. Department of Education,
Application Control Center, Attention:
(CFDA Number 84.116S), 550 12th
Street, SW., Room 7041, Potomac Center
Plaza, Washington, DC 20202–4260.
The Application Control Center
accepts hand deliveries daily between
8:00 a.m. and 4:30:00 p.m., Washington,
DC time, except Saturdays, Sundays,
and Federal holidays.
Note for Mail or Hand Delivery of Paper
Applications: If you mail or hand deliver
your application to the Department—
(1) You must indicate on the envelope
and—if not provided by the Department—in
Item 11 of the SF 424 the CFDA number,
including suffix letter, if any, of the
competition under which you are submitting
your application; and
(2) The Application Control Center will
mail to you a notification of receipt of your
grant application. If you do not receive this
grant notification within 15 business days
from the application deadline date, you
should call the U.S. Department of Education
Application Control Center at (202) 245–
6288.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
V. Application Review Information
Selection Criteria: The selection
criteria for evaluating the applications
for this program are from 34 CFR 75.210
and are listed in the application
package.
VI. Award Administration Information
1. Award Notices: If your application
is successful, we notify your U.S.
Representative and U.S. Senators and
send you a Grant Award Notification
(GAN). We may notify you informally,
also.
If your application is not evaluated or
not selected for funding, we notify you.
2. Administrative and National Policy
Requirements: We identify
administrative and national policy
requirements in the application package
and reference these and other
requirements in the Applicable
Regulations section of this notice.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:48 Apr 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
We reference the regulations outlining
the terms and conditions of an award in
the Applicable Regulations section of
this notice and include these and other
specific conditions in the GAN. The
GAN also incorporates your approved
application as part of your binding
commitments under the grant.
3. Reporting: At the end of your
project period, you must submit a final
performance report, including financial
information, as directed by the
Secretary. If you receive a multi-year
award, you must submit an annual
performance report that provides the
most current performance and financial
expenditure information as directed by
the Secretary under 34 CFR 75.118. The
Secretary may also require more
frequent performance reports under 34
CFR 75.720(c). For specific
requirements on reporting, please go to
https://www.ed.gov/fund/grant/apply/
appforms/appforms.html.
4. Performance Measures: Under the
Government Performance and Results
Act (GPRA), the Department will use the
following measures to assess the
performance of this program:
(a) The percentage of FIPSE grantees
reporting project dissemination to
others.
(b) The percentage of FIPSE projects
reporting institutionalization on their
home campuses.
If funded, you will be asked to collect
and report data on these measures in
your project’s annual performance
report (34 CFR 75.590). Applicants are
also advised to consider these two
measures in conceptualizing the design,
implementation, and evaluation of the
proposed project because of their
importance in the application review
process. Collection of data on these
measures should be part of the project
evaluation plan, along with any
measures of progress on goals and
objectives that are specific to your
project.
VII. Agency Contacts
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Krish Mathur, FIPSE—Fund for the
Improvement of Postsecondary
Education, 1990 K Street, NW., room
6155, Washington, DC 20006–8544.
Telephone: (202) 502–7512 or by e-mail:
krish.mathur@ed.gov.
If you use a TDD, call the FRS, toll
free, at 1–800–877–8339.
VIII. Other Information
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document
and a copy of the application package in
an accessible format (e.g., braille, large
print, audiotape, or computer diskette)
on request to the program contact
PO 00000
Frm 00059
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19543
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT in section VII
of
this notice.
Electronic Access to This Document:
You can view this document, as well as
all other documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Adobe Portable Document
Format (PDF) on the Internet at the
following site: https://www.ed.gov/news/
fedregister.
To use PDF, you must have Adobe
Acrobat Reader, which is available free
at this site. If you have questions about
using PDF, call the U.S. Government
Printing Office (GPO), toll free, at 1–
888–293–6498; or in the Washington,
DC, area at (202) 512–1530.
Note: The official version of this document
is the document published in the Federal
Register. Free Internet access to the official
edition of the Federal Register and the Code
of Federal Regulations is available on GPO
Access at: https://www.gpoaccess.gov/nara/
index.html.
Delegation of Authority: The Secretary
of Education has delegated authority to
Daniel T. Madzelan, Director,
Forecasting and Policy Analysis for the
Office of Postsecondary Education, to
perform the function of the Assistant
Secretary for Postsecondary Education.
Dated: April 24, 2009.
Daniel T. Madzelan,
Director, Forecasting and Policy Analysis.
[FR Doc. E9–9881 Filed 4–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Amended Notice of Intent To Modify
the Scope of the Environmental Impact
Statement for the Abengoa Biorefinery
Project Near Hugoton, KS
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, U.S. Department of
Energy.
ACTION: Amended notice of intent.
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of
Energy (DOE or the Department) is
providing this Amended Notice of
Intent to announce its intent to modify
the scope of an ongoing environmental
impact statement in which DOE is
assessing the potential environmental
impacts of a project proposed by
Abengoa Bioenergy Biomass of Kansas,
LLC (ABBK), to construct and operate a
biomass-to-ethanol and energy facility
near Hugoton, Kansas (Abengoa
Biorefinery Project). DOE issued its
original Notice of Intent on Aug. 25,
2008, for the proposed construction and
operation of a biomass-to-ethanol and
energy facility that was planned to be
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
19544
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 29, 2009 / Notices
integrated with a traditional grain-toethanol production facility on the same
site.
DATES: The public scoping period begins
today, and will end on May 29, 2009.
DOE will consider all comments
received or postmarked by May 29,
2009. DOE will consider late comments
to the extent practicable. DOE will hold
a public scoping meeting in Memorial
Hall at the Stevens County Courthouse,
200 East 6th St., Hugoton, Kansas
67951–2606, on May 19, 2009, from 6
p.m. to 8 p.m. DOE will give equal
weight to written and oral comments.
ADDRESSES: Please direct written
comments on the scope of the EIS to Ms.
Kristin Kerwin at the U.S. Department
of Energy, Golden Field Office, 1617
Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado,
80401. You also may contact Ms.
Kerwin by telephone at 303–275–4968,
by facsimile at 303–275–4790, or by email at kristin.kerwin@go.doe.gov.
Please label envelopes and the subject
line of e-mails with the heading
‘‘Abengoa EIS Scoping Comments.’’
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
information on the proposed project,
information on how to comment, or to
receive a copy of the Draft EIS when it
is issued, contact Ms. Kristin Kerwin by
any of the means described above under
the ‘‘ADDRESSES’’ section.
For further information on the DOE
Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Integrated
Biorefinery Program, contact: Ms. Valri
Lightner, Biomass Program Manager
(Acting), U.S. Department of Energy,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW., EE–
2E, Washington, DC 20585; telephone:
202–586–0937; facsimile: 202–586–
1640; e-mail: eere_biomass@ee.doe.gov.
For further information on DOE’s
Loan Guarantee Program, contact: Mr.
Daniel Tobin, Loan Guarantee Officer,
U.S. Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW., CF–1.3,
Washington, DC 20585; telephone: 202–
586–1940; facsimile: 202–586–4052; email: daniel.tobin@hq.doe.gov.
For further information on the U.S.
Department of Agriculture Rural
Business-Cooperative Service
Biorefinery Assistance Program contact:
Energy Branch, Attention: Biorefinery
Assistance Program, 1400 Independence
Avenue, SW., Mail Stop 3225,
Washington, DC 20250–3225; telephone:
202–720–1400.
For general information regarding the
DOE National Environmental Policy Act
(NEPA) process contact: Ms. Carol M.
Borgstrom, Director, Office of NEPA
Policy and Compliance, U.S.
Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW., GC–20,
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:48 Apr 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
Washington, DC 20585; e-mail
AskNEPA@hq.doe.gov; telephone 202–
586–4600; or leave a message at 1–800–
472–2756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: In September 2007, DOE
granted an initial award to ABBK to
advance the conceptual design, initiate
the permitting process, and support an
environmental review under NEPA for
ABBK’s proposed biomass-to-ethanol
and energy facility near Hugoton,
Kansas, pursuant to section 932 of
EPAct 2005. DOE requires completion of
the design, permitting, and
environmental review obligations prior
to deciding whether to co-fund the
construction and operation phase of the
project. The total anticipated cost of this
initial work was $37.5 million of which
DOE funded 40 percent ($15 million)
and ABBK provided 60 percent ($22.5
million). For additional information on
section 932 of EPAct 2005 and details
regarding DOE’s competitive solicitation
process for commercial-scale integrated
biorefineries, refer to the original NOI,
(73 FR 50001 (Aug. 25, 2008)).
In DOE’s original NOI, the
Department announced its intent to
prepare an EIS for the Abengoa
Biorefinery Project. DOE indicated that
it was proposing to negotiate a second
financial assistance agreement for
approximately $61 million for the final
design, construction, and operation of
the biomass-to-ethanol and energy
facility. This facility was planned to be
integrated with a traditional grain-toethanol production facility, and the
grain-to-ethanol facility was to be
constructed and operated using private
funds.
In January 2009, because of economic
viability concerns and anticipated
market conditions, ABBK notified DOE
that it no longer was considering the
construction and operation of the
traditional grain-to-ethanol facility, and,
further, was proposing to modify its
biomass-to-ethanol and energy
production facility by including a
steam-driven turbine to generate
electricity that would be supplied to the
regional power grid. In addition, ABBK
stated its intent to solicit loan
guarantees from the DOE Loan
Guarantee Program pursuant to Title
XVII of EPAct 2005 and from the USDA
RBC Biorefinery Assistance Program
pursuant to section 9003 of the 2008
Farm Bill.
EPAct 2005 (Title XVII) authorizes the
Department to issue loan guarantees to
eligible projects that ‘‘avoid, reduce, or
sequester air pollutants or
anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse
gases,’’ and ‘‘employ new or
PO 00000
Frm 00060
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
significantly improved technologies as
compared to commercial technologies in
service in the United States at the time
the guarantee is issued.’’ ABBK
submitted a DOE loan guarantee
application on February 26, 2009.
Section 9003 of the 2008 Farm Bill is
intended to assist in the development
and construction of commercial-scale
biorefineries and the retrofitting of
existing facilities using eligible
technology for the development of
advanced biofuels. ABBK has not
submitted an application to the USDA
RBC Biorefinery Assistance Program for
a loan guarantee under section 9003 of
the 2008 Farm Bill. After the receipt and
review of an application, the RBC may
decide to provide a loan guarantee to
ABBK. The RBC would only do so if the
application is for an eligible project that
provides for the development,
construction, and retrofitting of
commercial biorefineries using eligible
technology.
Previous Public Scoping Comments:
The Department received 14 scoping
comments during the public scoping
period that ended on October 9, 2008,
and received no comments after that
date. Commenters expressed support for
the proposed biorefinery project,
suggested there would be no adverse
environmental impacts from
constructing and operating the
biorefinery, requested information, or
asked that DOE include certain analyses
in the EIS. For example, the U.S.
Department of Agriculture Natural
Resources Conservation Service
requested an analysis of the potential
impacts from biomass production and
harvesting on soils, surface and
groundwater quality and quantity, air
quality, and upland wildlife habitat.
DOE will address these comments, as
well as those submitted during the
public comment period for this
Amended NOI, in the Abengoa
Biorefinery EIS.
Proposed Action: DOE is proposing to
provide cost-shared Federal funding,
only potentially, to issue a loan
guarantee for the Abengoa Biorefinery
Project. DOE would provide
approximately $61 million in Federal
funding pursuant to section 932 of
EPAct 2005 to ABBK for the final
design, construction, and initial
operation of a commercial-scale
biomass-to-ethanol and energy
production facility near Hugoton,
Kansas. The total estimated cost
(beyond the initial award) for final
design, construction, and initial
operation of the facility with the new
scope is approximately $290 million.
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 29, 2009 / Notices
DOE may also provide a loan guarantee
pursuant to Title XVII of EPAct 2005.1
The biomass-to-ethanol facility would
use an enzymatic hydrolysis process for
converting biomass feedstocks to
ethanol and co-products, and a
gasification technology to convert
biomass to synthesis gas. The synthesis
gas would be used to fire a gas-powered
boiler to generate steam that ultimately
would be used to produce electricity.
Biomass feedstock would be supplied
from waste products from the
production of crops produced near the
facility, and may include sorghum
stubble, corn stover, switchgrass, and
other opportunity feedstocks that are
available.
The estimated biomass usage (dry
metric tons per day) and output of
ethanol (million gallons per year) for the
biomass-to-ethanol facility, the project
site features and location, and
infrastructure requirements would
remain the same as outlined in the
original NOI. However, electricity
produced by the steam-powered turbine
would be sold to Pioneer Electric
Cooperative, Inc., for supply to the
regional power grid. As discussed in the
original NOI, the proposed project
would require a new transmission line
to bring electricity to the site. The
power produced by the steam-powered
turbine would be supplied back to the
regional power grid via this same new
transmission line. The line would run
from the proposed project location to
the east side of Road 11, then several
miles north to the existing substation.
In addition to processing an estimated
400 dry metric tons per day of biomass
for the biomass-to-ethanol facility (to
produce approximately 12 million
gallons per year of denatured ethanol),
the synthesis gas production facility
would process an estimated 300 dry
metric tons per day of biomass, and the
electric generation portion of the facility
would process and estimated 275 to 700
dry metric tons per day of biomass. The
entire facility would process
approximately 975 to 1400 dry metric
tons per day of biomass.
Alternatives: The Department
proposes to analyze the following
alternatives in detail in the EIS: (1) The
Abengoa Biorefinery Project as proposed
by ABBK; (2) the Abengoa Biorefinery
Project as proposed by ABBK without
supplying electricity to the regional
power grid; and (3) the No Action
alternative, which assumes that none of
the proposed facilities is constructed.
1 The amount requested for the loan guarantee is
not being disclosed at this time because it is
business sensitive. Moreover, should DOE approve
a loan guarantee, that amount may differ from the
original request.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:48 Apr 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
In addition, DOE plans to evaluate
ranges of options for implementing the
proposed project, including onsite
versus offsite storage of feedstock; wet
(unprotected or uncovered) versus dry
(protected or covered) storage of
feedstock; and smaller or larger boiler
sizes. DOE will also explore potential
mitigation measures that could be
implemented for any of the alternatives.
Preliminary Identification of
Environmental Issues: One purpose of
this Amended NOI is to solicit
comments and suggestions for DOE to
consider in preparing the EIS. As
background for public comment, the
Department tentatively has identified
the following list of potential
environmental issues for analysis. This
list identifies resource areas that may be
affected by construction and operation
of the proposed Abengoa Biorefinery
Project and that DOE plans to analyze in
the EIS. This list is not intended to be
all-inclusive or to imply any
predetermination of impacts. DOE
welcomes comments on these resource
areas and other suggestions on the scope
of the EIS.
1. Water resources: potential impacts
on surface and groundwater resources
and water quality, including effects of
water usage, wastewater management,
and storm water management.
2. Wetlands: potential impacts on
apparent isolated wetlands at the project
site.
3. Utility and transportation
infrastructure: requirements for delivery
of feedstocks and process chemicals to
the facility and distribution of products
from the facility to the marketplace.
4. Land use: changes in land use,
including the proposed site and the
geographical area that will provide
feedstock to the proposed facility.
5. Local and regional air quality:
changes in air quality.
6. Cultural resources: including
potential effects on historic and
archaeological resources and American
Indian tribal resources.
7. Ecological resources: terrestrial and
aquatic plants and animals including
state and Federally-listed threatened
and endangered species and other
protected resources.
8. Health and safety: including
construction-related safety and processrelated safety associated with handling
and management of process chemicals.
9. Noise: potential impacts resulting
from construction and operation of the
proposed plant and from transportation
of feedstocks, process materials, and
plant byproducts.
10. Socioeconomics: potential
socioeconomic impacts of plant
construction and operation, including
PO 00000
Frm 00061
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
19545
effects on public services and
infrastructure resulting from the influx
of construction personnel and plant
operating staff, and environmental
justice issues.
11. Aesthetic and scenic resources:
potential visual effects associated with
plant structures and operations.
12. Cumulative impacts that result
from the incremental impacts of the
proposed plant when added to the other
past, present, and reasonably
foreseeable future activities. This may
include potential impacts resulting from
widespread replication of this type of
technology, and from traditional grainto-ethanol production facilities.
13. Global climate change: potential
greenhouse gas emissions that may
result from this project.
Public Scoping Process: Interested
agencies, organizations, American
Indian tribes, and members of the public
are encouraged to submit comments or
suggestions concerning the proposed
content of the Abengoa Biorefinery EIS,
including the range of reasonable
alternatives and the potential
environmental impacts. DOE invites
written and oral comments and
suggestions at the public scoping
meeting. The public scoping period will
be open until May 29, 2009.
Please send written comments to Ms.
Kristin Kerwin, as described above
under the ‘‘ADDRESSES’’ section. The
public scoping meeting will be held at
the location, date, and time listed in the
‘‘DATES’’ and ‘‘ADDRESSES’’ sections of
this Amended NOI. This meeting will be
informal. A presiding officer designated
by DOE will establish procedures
governing the conduct of the meeting,
and DOE will provide an overview of
the proposed Abengoa Biorefinery
Project. DOE will not conduct the
meeting as an evidentiary hearing, and
those who choose to make statements
will not be cross-examined by other
speakers. However, DOE representatives
may ask speakers questions to help
ensure that DOE understands their
comments or suggestions.
For advanced registration to speak at
the meeting, please contact Ms. Kristin
Kerwin via telephone, mail, fax, or email as listed in the ‘‘ADDRESSES’’
section. For those persons who wish to
speak but do not register in advance,
DOE will provide an opportunity to
speak after previously scheduled
speakers have spoken, as time allows.
To ensure that everyone who wishes to
speak has a chance to do so, DOE will
allot at least five minutes to each
speaker. Persons wishing to speak on
behalf of an organization should
identify that organization when they
request to speak.
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
19546
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 81 / Wednesday, April 29, 2009 / Notices
DOE will retain a transcript of the
public scoping meeting and will make
the transcript available to the public for
review via the Golden Field Office
Online Public Reading Room at: https://
www.eere.energy.gov/golden/
Reading_Room.aspx. DOE will make
available additional copies of the public
scoping meeting transcripts during
business hours at the following location:
Stevens County Library, 500 S. Monroe
Street, Hugoton, Kansas 67951.
Schedule: DOE expects to issue the
Draft EIS in summer 2009 and will
announce the availability of the Draft
EIS in the Federal Register and local
media. DOE will consider comments on
the Draft EIS in preparing the Final EIS.
Interested parties who do not wish to
submit comments at this time, but who
would like to receive a copy of the Draft
EIS, should contact Kristin Kerwin, as
provided in the ‘‘ADDRESSES’’ section of
this notice.
Other Agency Involvement: The
Department has invited the U.S.
Department of Agriculture to become a
cooperating agency in the preparation of
this EIS. DOE anticipates that the U.S.
Department of Agriculture Rural
Business-Cooperative Service will assist
with the Department’s review process
and adopt the Abengoa Biorefinery EIS,
to the extent practicable, to satisfy that
agency’s NEPA-related requirements
and support its decisions under section
9003 of the 2008 Farm Bill.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 22,
2009.
Steven G. Chalk,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
[FR Doc. E9–9716 Filed 4–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
State Energy Advisory Board (STEAB)
Department of Energy.
Notice of Open Meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
Office, U.S. Department of Energy, 1617
Cole Boulevard, Golden, CO 80401,
Telephone 303–275–4801.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of the Board: To make
recommendations to the Assistant
Secretary for the Office of Energy
Efficiency and Renewable Energy
regarding goals and objectives,
programmatic and administrative
policies, and to otherwise carry out the
Board’s responsibilities as designated in
the State Energy Efficiency Programs
Improvement Act of 1990 (Pub. L. 101–
440).
Tentative Agenda: Discuss ways
STEAB can support DOE’s
implementation of the Economic
Recovery Act, support
commercialization efforts for both
energy efficiency and renewable energy,
consider potential collaborative
activities involving the State Energy
Offices, and update members on other
routine business matters.
Public Participation: The meeting is
open to the public. Members of the
public who wish to make oral
statements pertaining to agenda items
should contact Gary Burch at the
address or telephone number listed
above. Requests to make oral comments
must be received five days prior to the
teleconference; reasonable provisions
will be made to include requested
topic(s) on the agenda. Written
statements may be filed with the Board
either before or after the meeting. The
Chair of the Board is empowered to
conduct the meeting in a fashion that
will facilitate the orderly conduct of
business.
Minutes: The minutes of the meeting
will be available for public review and
copying within 60 days on the STEAB
Web site, https://www.steab.org.
Issued at Washington, DC, on April 22,
2009.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. E9–9762 Filed 4–28–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
This notice announces a
meeting of the State Energy Advisory
Board (STEAB). The Federal Advisory
Committee Act (Pub. L. 92–463; 86 Stat.
770) requires that public notice of these
meetings be announced in the Federal
Register.
DATES: June 23–25, 2009.
ADDRESSES: L’Enfant Plaza Hotel, 480
L’Enfant Plaza, SW. Washington, DC
20024.
pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gary
Burch, STEAB Designated Federal
Officer, Office of Commercialization and
Project Management, Golden Field
VerDate Nov<24>2008
17:48 Apr 28, 2009
Jkt 217001
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Environmental Management SiteSpecific Advisory Board, Savannah
River Site
Department of Energy.
Notice of open meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: This notice announces a
meeting of the Environmental
Management Site-Specific Advisory
Board (EM SSAB), Savannah River Site.
The Federal Advisory Committee Act
(Pub. L. No. 92–463, 86 Stat. 770)
PO 00000
Frm 00062
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
requires that public notice of this
meeting be announced in the Federal
Register.
DATES: Monday, May 18, 2009, 1 p.m.–
5 p.m.
Tuesday, May 19, 2009, 8:30 a.m.–
4 p.m.
ADDRESSES: The Mulberry Inn, 601 East
Bay Street, Savannah, Georgia 31401.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Gerri Flemming, Office of External
Affairs, Department of Energy,
Savannah River Operations Office, P.O.
Box A, Aiken, SC 29802; Phone: (803)
952–7886.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Purpose of the Board: The purpose of
the Board is to make recommendations
to DOE in the areas of environmental
restoration, waste management, and
related activities.
Tentative Agenda:
Monday, May 18, 2009
1 p.m. Combined Committee Session
5 p.m. Adjourn
Tuesday, May 19, 2009
8:30 a.m. Approval of Minutes,
Agency Updates, Public Comment
Session, Chair and Facilitator
Updates, Administrative Committee
Report, Strategic and Legacy
Management Committee Report,
Public Comment Session
12 p.m. Lunch Break
1 p.m. Waste Management Committee
Report, Facility Disposition and
Site Remediation Committee
Report, Nuclear Materials
Committee Report, Public Comment
Session
4 p.m. Adjourn
If needed, time will be allotted after
public comments for items added to the
agenda and administrative details. A
final agenda will be available at the
meeting Monday, May 18, 2009.
Public Participation: The EM SSAB,
Savannah River Site, welcomes the
attendance of the public at its advisory
committee meetings and will make
every effort to accommodate persons
with physical disabilities or special
needs. If you require special
accommodations due to a disability,
please contact Gerri Flemming at least
seven days in advance of the meeting at
the phone number listed above. Written
statements may be filed with the Board
either before or after the meeting.
Individuals who wish to make oral
statements pertaining to agenda items
should contact Gerri Flemming’s office
at the address or telephone listed above.
Requests must be received five days
prior to the meeting and reasonable
provision will be made to include the
E:\FR\FM\29APN1.SGM
29APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 81 (Wednesday, April 29, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 19543-19546]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9716]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
Amended Notice of Intent To Modify the Scope of the Environmental
Impact Statement for the Abengoa Biorefinery Project Near Hugoton, KS
AGENCY: Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, U.S.
Department of Energy.
ACTION: Amended notice of intent.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE or the Department) is
providing this Amended Notice of Intent to announce its intent to
modify the scope of an ongoing environmental impact statement in which
DOE is assessing the potential environmental impacts of a project
proposed by Abengoa Bioenergy Biomass of Kansas, LLC (ABBK), to
construct and operate a biomass-to-ethanol and energy facility near
Hugoton, Kansas (Abengoa Biorefinery Project). DOE issued its original
Notice of Intent on Aug. 25, 2008, for the proposed construction and
operation of a biomass-to-ethanol and energy facility that was planned
to be
[[Page 19544]]
integrated with a traditional grain-to-ethanol production facility on
the same site.
DATES: The public scoping period begins today, and will end on May 29,
2009. DOE will consider all comments received or postmarked by May 29,
2009. DOE will consider late comments to the extent practicable. DOE
will hold a public scoping meeting in Memorial Hall at the Stevens
County Courthouse, 200 East 6th St., Hugoton, Kansas 67951-2606, on May
19, 2009, from 6 p.m. to 8 p.m. DOE will give equal weight to written
and oral comments.
ADDRESSES: Please direct written comments on the scope of the EIS to
Ms. Kristin Kerwin at the U.S. Department of Energy, Golden Field
Office, 1617 Cole Boulevard, Golden, Colorado, 80401. You also may
contact Ms. Kerwin by telephone at 303-275-4968, by facsimile at 303-
275-4790, or by e-mail at kristin.kerwin@go.doe.gov. Please label
envelopes and the subject line of e-mails with the heading ``Abengoa
EIS Scoping Comments.''
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For information on the proposed
project, information on how to comment, or to receive a copy of the
Draft EIS when it is issued, contact Ms. Kristin Kerwin by any of the
means described above under the ``ADDRESSES'' section.
For further information on the DOE Office of Energy Efficiency and
Renewable Energy, Integrated Biorefinery Program, contact: Ms. Valri
Lightner, Biomass Program Manager (Acting), U.S. Department of Energy,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW., EE-2E, Washington, DC 20585; telephone:
202-586-0937; facsimile: 202-586-1640; e-mail: eere_biomass@ee.doe.gov.
For further information on DOE's Loan Guarantee Program, contact:
Mr. Daniel Tobin, Loan Guarantee Officer, U.S. Department of Energy,
1000 Independence Avenue, SW., CF-1.3, Washington, DC 20585; telephone:
202-586-1940; facsimile: 202-586-4052; e-mail: daniel.tobin@hq.doe.gov.
For further information on the U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural
Business-Cooperative Service Biorefinery Assistance Program contact:
Energy Branch, Attention: Biorefinery Assistance Program, 1400
Independence Avenue, SW., Mail Stop 3225, Washington, DC 20250-3225;
telephone: 202-720-1400.
For general information regarding the DOE National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) process contact: Ms. Carol M. Borgstrom, Director,
Office of NEPA Policy and Compliance, U.S. Department of Energy, 1000
Independence Avenue, SW., GC-20, Washington, DC 20585; e-mail
AskNEPA@hq.doe.gov; telephone 202-586-4600; or leave a message at 1-
800-472-2756.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background: In September 2007, DOE granted an initial award to ABBK
to advance the conceptual design, initiate the permitting process, and
support an environmental review under NEPA for ABBK's proposed biomass-
to-ethanol and energy facility near Hugoton, Kansas, pursuant to
section 932 of EPAct 2005. DOE requires completion of the design,
permitting, and environmental review obligations prior to deciding
whether to co-fund the construction and operation phase of the project.
The total anticipated cost of this initial work was $37.5 million of
which DOE funded 40 percent ($15 million) and ABBK provided 60 percent
($22.5 million). For additional information on section 932 of EPAct
2005 and details regarding DOE's competitive solicitation process for
commercial-scale integrated biorefineries, refer to the original NOI,
(73 FR 50001 (Aug. 25, 2008)).
In DOE's original NOI, the Department announced its intent to
prepare an EIS for the Abengoa Biorefinery Project. DOE indicated that
it was proposing to negotiate a second financial assistance agreement
for approximately $61 million for the final design, construction, and
operation of the biomass-to-ethanol and energy facility. This facility
was planned to be integrated with a traditional grain-to-ethanol
production facility, and the grain-to-ethanol facility was to be
constructed and operated using private funds.
In January 2009, because of economic viability concerns and
anticipated market conditions, ABBK notified DOE that it no longer was
considering the construction and operation of the traditional grain-to-
ethanol facility, and, further, was proposing to modify its biomass-to-
ethanol and energy production facility by including a steam-driven
turbine to generate electricity that would be supplied to the regional
power grid. In addition, ABBK stated its intent to solicit loan
guarantees from the DOE Loan Guarantee Program pursuant to Title XVII
of EPAct 2005 and from the USDA RBC Biorefinery Assistance Program
pursuant to section 9003 of the 2008 Farm Bill.
EPAct 2005 (Title XVII) authorizes the Department to issue loan
guarantees to eligible projects that ``avoid, reduce, or sequester air
pollutants or anthropogenic emissions of greenhouse gases,'' and
``employ new or significantly improved technologies as compared to
commercial technologies in service in the United States at the time the
guarantee is issued.'' ABBK submitted a DOE loan guarantee application
on February 26, 2009.
Section 9003 of the 2008 Farm Bill is intended to assist in the
development and construction of commercial-scale biorefineries and the
retrofitting of existing facilities using eligible technology for the
development of advanced biofuels. ABBK has not submitted an application
to the USDA RBC Biorefinery Assistance Program for a loan guarantee
under section 9003 of the 2008 Farm Bill. After the receipt and review
of an application, the RBC may decide to provide a loan guarantee to
ABBK. The RBC would only do so if the application is for an eligible
project that provides for the development, construction, and
retrofitting of commercial biorefineries using eligible technology.
Previous Public Scoping Comments: The Department received 14
scoping comments during the public scoping period that ended on October
9, 2008, and received no comments after that date. Commenters expressed
support for the proposed biorefinery project, suggested there would be
no adverse environmental impacts from constructing and operating the
biorefinery, requested information, or asked that DOE include certain
analyses in the EIS. For example, the U.S. Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service requested an analysis of the
potential impacts from biomass production and harvesting on soils,
surface and groundwater quality and quantity, air quality, and upland
wildlife habitat. DOE will address these comments, as well as those
submitted during the public comment period for this Amended NOI, in the
Abengoa Biorefinery EIS.
Proposed Action: DOE is proposing to provide cost-shared Federal
funding, only potentially, to issue a loan guarantee for the Abengoa
Biorefinery Project. DOE would provide approximately $61 million in
Federal funding pursuant to section 932 of EPAct 2005 to ABBK for the
final design, construction, and initial operation of a commercial-scale
biomass-to-ethanol and energy production facility near Hugoton, Kansas.
The total estimated cost (beyond the initial award) for final design,
construction, and initial operation of the facility with the new scope
is approximately $290 million.
[[Page 19545]]
DOE may also provide a loan guarantee pursuant to Title XVII of EPAct
2005.\1\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ The amount requested for the loan guarantee is not being
disclosed at this time because it is business sensitive. Moreover,
should DOE approve a loan guarantee, that amount may differ from the
original request.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The biomass-to-ethanol facility would use an enzymatic hydrolysis
process for converting biomass feedstocks to ethanol and co-products,
and a gasification technology to convert biomass to synthesis gas. The
synthesis gas would be used to fire a gas-powered boiler to generate
steam that ultimately would be used to produce electricity. Biomass
feedstock would be supplied from waste products from the production of
crops produced near the facility, and may include sorghum stubble, corn
stover, switchgrass, and other opportunity feedstocks that are
available.
The estimated biomass usage (dry metric tons per day) and output of
ethanol (million gallons per year) for the biomass-to-ethanol facility,
the project site features and location, and infrastructure requirements
would remain the same as outlined in the original NOI. However,
electricity produced by the steam-powered turbine would be sold to
Pioneer Electric Cooperative, Inc., for supply to the regional power
grid. As discussed in the original NOI, the proposed project would
require a new transmission line to bring electricity to the site. The
power produced by the steam-powered turbine would be supplied back to
the regional power grid via this same new transmission line. The line
would run from the proposed project location to the east side of Road
11, then several miles north to the existing substation.
In addition to processing an estimated 400 dry metric tons per day
of biomass for the biomass-to-ethanol facility (to produce
approximately 12 million gallons per year of denatured ethanol), the
synthesis gas production facility would process an estimated 300 dry
metric tons per day of biomass, and the electric generation portion of
the facility would process and estimated 275 to 700 dry metric tons per
day of biomass. The entire facility would process approximately 975 to
1400 dry metric tons per day of biomass.
Alternatives: The Department proposes to analyze the following
alternatives in detail in the EIS: (1) The Abengoa Biorefinery Project
as proposed by ABBK; (2) the Abengoa Biorefinery Project as proposed by
ABBK without supplying electricity to the regional power grid; and (3)
the No Action alternative, which assumes that none of the proposed
facilities is constructed.
In addition, DOE plans to evaluate ranges of options for
implementing the proposed project, including onsite versus offsite
storage of feedstock; wet (unprotected or uncovered) versus dry
(protected or covered) storage of feedstock; and smaller or larger
boiler sizes. DOE will also explore potential mitigation measures that
could be implemented for any of the alternatives.
Preliminary Identification of Environmental Issues: One purpose of
this Amended NOI is to solicit comments and suggestions for DOE to
consider in preparing the EIS. As background for public comment, the
Department tentatively has identified the following list of potential
environmental issues for analysis. This list identifies resource areas
that may be affected by construction and operation of the proposed
Abengoa Biorefinery Project and that DOE plans to analyze in the EIS.
This list is not intended to be all-inclusive or to imply any
predetermination of impacts. DOE welcomes comments on these resource
areas and other suggestions on the scope of the EIS.
1. Water resources: potential impacts on surface and groundwater
resources and water quality, including effects of water usage,
wastewater management, and storm water management.
2. Wetlands: potential impacts on apparent isolated wetlands at the
project site.
3. Utility and transportation infrastructure: requirements for
delivery of feedstocks and process chemicals to the facility and
distribution of products from the facility to the marketplace.
4. Land use: changes in land use, including the proposed site and
the geographical area that will provide feedstock to the proposed
facility.
5. Local and regional air quality: changes in air quality.
6. Cultural resources: including potential effects on historic and
archaeological resources and American Indian tribal resources.
7. Ecological resources: terrestrial and aquatic plants and animals
including state and Federally-listed threatened and endangered species
and other protected resources.
8. Health and safety: including construction-related safety and
process-related safety associated with handling and management of
process chemicals.
9. Noise: potential impacts resulting from construction and
operation of the proposed plant and from transportation of feedstocks,
process materials, and plant byproducts.
10. Socioeconomics: potential socioeconomic impacts of plant
construction and operation, including effects on public services and
infrastructure resulting from the influx of construction personnel and
plant operating staff, and environmental justice issues.
11. Aesthetic and scenic resources: potential visual effects
associated with plant structures and operations.
12. Cumulative impacts that result from the incremental impacts of
the proposed plant when added to the other past, present, and
reasonably foreseeable future activities. This may include potential
impacts resulting from widespread replication of this type of
technology, and from traditional grain-to-ethanol production
facilities.
13. Global climate change: potential greenhouse gas emissions that
may result from this project.
Public Scoping Process: Interested agencies, organizations,
American Indian tribes, and members of the public are encouraged to
submit comments or suggestions concerning the proposed content of the
Abengoa Biorefinery EIS, including the range of reasonable alternatives
and the potential environmental impacts. DOE invites written and oral
comments and suggestions at the public scoping meeting. The public
scoping period will be open until May 29, 2009.
Please send written comments to Ms. Kristin Kerwin, as described
above under the ``ADDRESSES'' section. The public scoping meeting will
be held at the location, date, and time listed in the ``DATES'' and
``ADDRESSES'' sections of this Amended NOI. This meeting will be
informal. A presiding officer designated by DOE will establish
procedures governing the conduct of the meeting, and DOE will provide
an overview of the proposed Abengoa Biorefinery Project. DOE will not
conduct the meeting as an evidentiary hearing, and those who choose to
make statements will not be cross-examined by other speakers. However,
DOE representatives may ask speakers questions to help ensure that DOE
understands their comments or suggestions.
For advanced registration to speak at the meeting, please contact
Ms. Kristin Kerwin via telephone, mail, fax, or e-mail as listed in the
``ADDRESSES'' section. For those persons who wish to speak but do not
register in advance, DOE will provide an opportunity to speak after
previously scheduled speakers have spoken, as time allows. To ensure
that everyone who wishes to speak has a chance to do so, DOE will allot
at least five minutes to each speaker. Persons wishing to speak on
behalf of an organization should identify that organization when they
request to speak.
[[Page 19546]]
DOE will retain a transcript of the public scoping meeting and will
make the transcript available to the public for review via the Golden
Field Office Online Public Reading Room at: https://www.eere.energy.gov/golden/Reading_Room.aspx. DOE will make available additional copies of
the public scoping meeting transcripts during business hours at the
following location: Stevens County Library, 500 S. Monroe Street,
Hugoton, Kansas 67951.
Schedule: DOE expects to issue the Draft EIS in summer 2009 and
will announce the availability of the Draft EIS in the Federal Register
and local media. DOE will consider comments on the Draft EIS in
preparing the Final EIS.
Interested parties who do not wish to submit comments at this time,
but who would like to receive a copy of the Draft EIS, should contact
Kristin Kerwin, as provided in the ``ADDRESSES'' section of this
notice.
Other Agency Involvement: The Department has invited the U.S.
Department of Agriculture to become a cooperating agency in the
preparation of this EIS. DOE anticipates that the U.S. Department of
Agriculture Rural Business-Cooperative Service will assist with the
Department's review process and adopt the Abengoa Biorefinery EIS, to
the extent practicable, to satisfy that agency's NEPA-related
requirements and support its decisions under section 9003 of the 2008
Farm Bill.
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 22, 2009.
Steven G. Chalk,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Energy Efficiency and Renewable
Energy.
[FR Doc. E9-9716 Filed 4-28-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P