Safety Zone; BWRC `300' Enduro; Lake Moolvalya, Parker, AZ, 19031-19034 [E9-9575]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 79 / Monday, April 27, 2009 / Proposed Rules
11–2A, Notice of Proposed Rulemaking
Distribution System, which describes
the application procedure.
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
The Proposal
This action proposes to amend Title
14, Code of Federal Regulations (14
CFR), Part 71 by changing the airport
name from Mansfield/Lahm Municipal
Airport to Mansfield/Lahm Regional
Airport; adding additional Class E
airspace for SIAPs operations at
Mansfield/Lahm Regional Airport,
Mansfield, OH; and would update the
geographic coordinates of Shelby
Community Airport and Willard
Airport.
The area would be depicted on
appropriate aeronautical charts.
Class E airspace areas are published
in Paragraph 6005 of FAA Order
7400.9S, dated October 3, 2008, and
effective October 31, 2008, which is
incorporated by reference in 14 CFR
71.1. The Class E airspace designation
listed in this document would be
published subsequently in the Order.
The FAA has determined that this
proposed regulation only involves an
established body of technical
regulations for which frequent and
routine amendments are necessary to
keep them operationally current. It,
therefore, (1) is not a ‘‘significant
regulatory action’’ under Executive
Order 12866; (2) is not a ‘‘significant
rule’’ under DOT Regulatory Policies
and Procedures (44 FR 11034; February
26, 1979); and (3) does not warrant
preparation of a Regulatory Evaluation
as the anticipated impact is so minimal.
Since this is a routine matter that will
only affect air traffic procedures and air
navigation, it is certified that this rule,
when promulgated, will not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities
under the criteria of the Regulatory
Flexibility Act. The FAA’s authority to
issue rules regarding aviation safety is
found in Title 49 of the U.S. Code.
Subtitle 1, Section 106 describes the
authority of the FAA Administrator.
Subtitle VII, Aviation Programs,
describes in more detail the scope of the
agency’s authority. This rulemaking is
promulgated under the authority
described in Subtitle VII, Part A,
Subpart I, Section 40103. Under that
section, the FAA is charged with
prescribing regulations to assign the use
of airspace necessary to ensure the
safety of aircraft and the efficient use of
airspace. This regulation is within the
scope of that authority as it would add
additional controlled airspace at
Mansfield/Lahm Regional Airport,
Mansfield, OH.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:06 Apr 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 71
Airspace, Incorporation by reference,
Navigation (air).
The Proposed Amendment
In consideration of the foregoing, the
Federal Aviation Administration
proposes to amend 14 CFR Part 71 as
follows:
PART 71—DESIGNATION OF CLASS A,
B, C, D, AND E AIRSPACE AREAS;
AIRWAYS; ROUTES; AND REPORTING
POINTS
1. The authority citation for Part 71
continues to read as follows:
19031
Issued in Fort Worth, TX, on April 15,
2009.
Anthony D. Roetzel,
Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO
Central Service Center.
[FR Doc. E9–9522 Filed 4–24–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4901–13–P
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2008–1180]
RIN 1625–AA00
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g); 40103, 40113,
40120; E.O. 10854, 24 FR 9565, 3 CFR, 1959–
1963 Comp., p. 389.
Safety Zone; BWRC ‘300’ Enduro; Lake
Moolvalya, Parker, AZ
§ 71.1
AGENCY:
[Amended]
2. The incorporation by reference in
14 CFR 71.1 of Federal Aviation
Administration Order 7400.9S, Airspace
Designations and Reporting Points,
dated October 3, 2008, and effective
October 31, 2008, is amended as
follows:
Paragraph 6005 Class E Airspace areas
extending upward from 700 feet or more
above the surface of the earth.
*
*
*
AGL OH E5
*
*
Mansfield, OH [Amended]
Mansfield, Mansfield Lahm Regional Airport,
OH
(Lat. 40°49′17″ N., long. 82°31′00″ W.)
Galion, Galion Municipal Airport, OH
(Lat. 40°45′12″ N., long. 82°43′26″ W.)
Shelby, Shelby Community Airport, OH
(Lat. 40°52′22″ N., long. 82°41′51″ W)
Willard, Willard Airport, OH
(Lat. 41°02′20″ N., long. 82°43′28″ W.)
Mansfield VORTAC
(Lat. 40°52′07″ N., long. 82°35′28″ W.)
That airspace extending upward from 700
feet above the surface within a 6.9-mile
radius of Mansfield Lahm Regional Airport
and within a 6.3-mile radius of Galion
Municipal Airport, and within a 6.3-mile
radius of Shelby Community Airport, and
within a 6.3-mile radius of Willard Airport,
and within 4 miles each side of the 137°
bearing from Mansfield Lahm Regional
Airport extending from the 6.9-mile radius to
11.1 miles southeast of the airport, and
within 4 miles each side of the 317° bearing
from Mansfield Lahm Regional Airport
extending from the 6.9-mile radius to 10.7
miles northwest of the airport, and within 6.1
miles each side of the Mansfield VORTAC
307° radial extending from the 6.9-mile
radius to 13.3 miles northwest of the
VORTAC, and within 4.4 miles each side of
the Mansfield VORTAC 130° radial extending
from the 6.9-mile radius to 13.8 miles
southeast of the VORTAC.
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00009
*
Fmt 4702
*
Sfmt 4702
ACTION:
Coast Guard, DHS.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes a
safety zone, on the navigable waters of
the Lake Moolvalya region on the lower
Colorado River in support of the
Bluewater Resort and Casino ‘300’
Enduro. This safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators,
participating vessels, and other vessels
and users of the waterway. Persons and
vessels are prohibited from entering
into, transiting through, or anchoring
within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or
his designated representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must either be submitted to our Online
docket via https://www.regulations.gov
on or before May 27, 2009 or reach the
Docket Management Facility by that
date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG–2008–1180 using any
one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329. To avoid duplication,
please use only one of these methods.
For instructions on submitting
comments, see the ‘‘Public Participation
and Request for Comments’’ portion of
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
27APP1
19032
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 79 / Monday, April 27, 2009 / Proposed Rules
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Petty Officer Shane Jackson,
USCG, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego at (619)
278–2767. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2008–1180),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online, or by fax, mail or hand
delivery, but please use only one of
these means. We recommend that you
include your name and a mailing
address, an e-mail address, or a phone
number in the body of your document
so that we can contact you if we have
questions regarding your submission.
To submit your comment Online, go
to https://www.regulations.gov, select the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert ‘‘USCG–
XXXX–XXXX’’ in the Docket ID box,
press Enter, and then click on the
balloon shape in the Actions column. If
you submit your comments by mail or
hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 81⁄2 by
11 inches, suitable for copying and
electronic filing. If you submit them by
mail and would like to know that they
reached the Facility, please enclose a
stamped, self-addressed postcard or
envelope. We will consider all
comments and material received during
the comment period and may change
the rule based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, select the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert USCG–
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:06 Apr 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
2008–1180 in the Docket ID box, press
Enter, and then click on the item in the
Docket ID column. You may also visit
either the Docket Management Facility
in Room W12–140 on the ground floor
of the Department of Transportation
West Building, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590,
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except Federal holidays;
or the U.S. Coast Guard Sector San
Diego, 2710 N. Harbor Drive, San Diego,
CA 92101 between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal
holidays. We have an agreement with
the Department of Transportation to use
the Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic
form of all comments received into any
of our dockets by the name of the
individual submitting the comment (or
signing the comment, if submitted on
behalf of an association, business, labor
union, etc.). You may review the
Department of Transportation’s Privacy
Act notice regarding our public dockets
in the January 17, 2008 issue of the
Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public
meeting. But you may submit a request
for one to the Docket Management
Facility at the address under ADDRESSES
explaining why one would be
beneficial. If we determine that one
would aid this rulemaking, we will hold
one at a time and place announced by
a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
RPM Racing Enterprises is sponsoring
the Bluewater Resort and Casino ‘300’
Enduro. The event is a closed boat
endurance race consisting of 30 to 50
powerboats ranging from 16 to 26 feet in
length. The sponsor will provide four
water rescue boats and eight patrol boats
for this event. This safety zone is
necessary to provide for the safety of the
participants, crew, spectators, sponsor
vessels, and other users of the
waterway.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes a safety
zone that would be enforced from 6 a.m.
to 6 p.m. on October 23, 2009 to October
25, 2009. The limits of the safety zone
would be as follows: The Headgate Dam
at 34°11.20 N., 114°13.74 W. following
the river northeast to 34°11.76 N.,
114°13.50 W.
This safety zone is necessary to
provide for the safety of the crews,
spectators, and participants of the event
and to protect other vessels and users of
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
the waterway. Persons and vessels will
be prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or anchoring within
this safety zone unless authorized by the
Captain of the Port, or his designated
representative.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after
considering numerous statutes and
executive orders related to rulemaking.
Below we summarize our analyses
based on 13 of these statutes or
executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a
‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866,
Regulatory Planning and Review, and
does not require an assessment of
potential costs and benefits under
section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office
of Management and Budget has not
reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of
this proposed rule to be so minimal that
a full Regulatory Evaluation is
unnecessary. This determination is
based on the size and location of the
safety zone. Commercial vessels will not
be hindered by the safety zone.
Recreational vessels will not be allowed
to transit through the designated safety
zone during the specified times.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act
(5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered
whether this proposed rule would have
a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities.
The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises
small businesses, not-for-profit
organizations that are independently
owned and operated and are not
dominant in their fields, and
governmental jurisdictions with
populations of less than 50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5
U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed rule
would not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
This proposed rule would affect the
following entities, some of which might
be small entities: The owners or
operators of vessels intending to transit
or anchor in the Lake Moolvalya region
on the lower Colorado River from 6 a.m.
to 6 p.m. on October 23, 2009 to October
25, 2009.
This safety zone would not have a
significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for
the following reasons. This rule would
be in effect for twelve hours for a period
of 3 days. Although the safety zone
would apply to the entire width of the
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
27APP1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 79 / Monday, April 27, 2009 / Proposed Rules
river, traffic would be allowed to pass
through the zone with the permission of
the Coast Guard patrol commander.
Before the effective period, we will
publish a local notice to mariners (LNM)
and will issue broadcast notice to
mariners (BNM) alerts via marine
channel 16 VFH before the safety zone
is enforced.
If you think that your business,
organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity
and that this rule would have a
significant economic impact on it,
please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it
qualifies and how and to what degree
this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small
Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121),
we want to assist small entities in
understanding this proposed rule so that
they can better evaluate its effects on
them and participate in the rulemaking.
If the rule would affect your small
business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions
concerning its provisions or options for
compliance, please contact Petty Officer
Kristen Beer, USCG, Waterways
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector
San Diego at (619) 278–7233. The Coast
Guard will not retaliate against small
entities that question or complain about
this rule or any policy or action of the
Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no
new collection of information under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501–3520.).
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
Federalism
A rule has implications for
Federalism under Executive Order
13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial
direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt
State law or impose a substantial direct
cost of compliance on them. We have
analyzed this proposed rule under that
Order and have determined that it does
not have implications for Federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires
Federal agencies to assess the effects of
their discretionary regulatory actions. In
particular, the Act addresses actions
that may result in the expenditure by a
State, local, or tribal government, in the
aggregate, or by the private sector of
$100,000,000 or more in any one year.
Though this proposed rule would not
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:06 Apr 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
result in such an expenditure, we do
discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere
in this preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a
taking of private property or otherwise
have taking implications under
Executive Order 12630, Governmental
Actions and Interference with
Constitutionally Protected Property
Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable
standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of
Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice
Reform, to minimize litigation,
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce
burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically
significant rule and would not create an
environmental risk to health or risk to
safety that might disproportionately
affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have
tribal implications under Executive
Order 13175, Consultation and
Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have
a substantial direct effect on one or
more Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Executive Order 13211, Actions
Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have
determined that it is not a ‘‘significant
energy action’’ under that order because
it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’
under Executive Order 12866 and is not
likely to have a significant adverse effect
on the supply, distribution, or use of
energy. The Administrator of the Office
of Information and Regulatory Affairs
has not designated it as a significant
energy action. Therefore, it does not
require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer
and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use
voluntary consensus standards in their
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
19033
regulatory activities unless the agency
provides Congress, through the Office of
Management and Budget, with an
explanation of why using these
standards would be inconsistent with
applicable law or otherwise impractical.
Voluntary consensus standards are
technical standards (e.g., specifications
of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling
procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or
adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use
technical standards. Therefore, we did
not consider the use of voluntary
consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule
under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 0023.1
and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast
Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969
(NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination
that this action is one of a category of
actions which do not individually or
cumulatively have a significant effect on
the human environment. A preliminary
‘‘Environmental Analysis Check List’’
supporting this preliminary
determination is available in the docket
where indicated under ADDRESSES. This
proposed rule involves regulations that
establish a temporary safety zone to
provide for the safety of personnel
during the BWRC ‘300’ Enduro. We seek
any comments or information that may
lead to the discovery of a significant
environmental impact from this
proposed rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation
(water), Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Security measures,
Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, the Coast Guard proposes to
amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION
AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165
continues to read as follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 122, 1231; 46 U.S.C.
Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195;
33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department
of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary safety zone
§ 165.T11–145 to read as follows:
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
27APP1
19034
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 79 / Monday, April 27, 2009 / Proposed Rules
§ 165.T11–145 Safety zone; BWRC ‘300’
Enduro; Lake Moolvalya, Parker, AZ.
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
(a) Location. The limits of the
proposed safety zone are as follows: the
Headgate Dam at 34°11.20 N., 114°13.74
W. following the river northeast to
34°11.76 N., 114°13.50 W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section
will be enforced from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m.
on October 23, 2009 through October 25,
2009. If the event concludes prior to the
scheduled termination time, the Captain
of the Port will cease enforcement of
this safety zone and will announce that
fact via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following
definition applies to this section:
designated representative means any
commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board
Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary,
and local, State, and Federal law
enforcement vessels who have been
authorized to act on the behalf of the
Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit
through or anchoring within this safety
zone is prohibited unless authorized by
the Captain of the Port of San Diego or
his designated on-scene representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to
transit through the safety zone may
request authorization to do so from the
Patrol Commander (PATCOM). The
PATCOM may be contacted on VHF–FM
Channel 16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall
comply with the instructions of the
Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the
designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast
Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio,
flashing light, or other means, the
operator of a vessel shall proceed as
directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted
by other Federal, State, or local
agencies.
Dated: February 13, 2009.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the
Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. E9–9575 Filed 4–24–09; 8:45 am]
dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with PROPOSALS
BILLING CODE 4910–15–P
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:06 Apr 24, 2009
Jkt 217001
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0120]
RIN 1625–AA00
Safety Zone; Coronado Fourth of July
Fireworks; San Diego Bay, San Diego,
CA
Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes
establishing a temporary safety zone on
the navigable waters of the San Diego
Bay in support of the Coronado Fourth
of July Fireworks. This temporary safety
zone is necessary to provide for the
safety of crew, spectators, and other
users and vessels of the waterway.
Persons and vessels are prohibited from
entering into, transiting through, or
anchoring within this temporary safety
zone unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port or his designated
representative.
DATES: Comments and related material
must be received by the Coast Guard on
or before May 27, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
identified by docket number USCG–
2009–0120 using any one of the
following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal:
https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202–493–2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility
(M–30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground
Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey
Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590–
0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail
address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays. The telephone number
is 202–366–9329.
To avoid duplication, please use only
one of these methods. See the ‘‘Public
Participation and Request for
Comments’’ portion of the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section
below for instructions on submitting
comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Petty Officer Kristen Beer,
USCG, Waterways Management, U.S.
Coast Guard Sector San Diego at (619)
278–7262. If you have questions on
viewing or submitting material to the
docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone
202–366–9826.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for
Comments
We encourage you to participate in
this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All
comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov and will include
any personal information you have
provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please
include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG–2009–0120),
indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment
applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You
may submit your comments and
material online (via https://
www.regulations.gov) or by fax, mail or
hand delivery, but please use only one
of these means. If you submit a
comment online via https://
www.regulations.gov, it will be
considered received by the Coast Guard
when you successfully transmit the
comment. If you fax, hand delivery or
mail your comment, it will be
considered as having been received by
the Coast Guard when it is received at
the Docket Management Facility. We
recommend that you include your name
and a mailing address, an e-mail
address, or a telephone number in the
body of your document so that we can
contact you if we have questions
regarding your submission.
To submit your comment online, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, select the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert ‘‘USCG–
2009–0120’’ in the Docket ID box, press
Enter, and then click on the balloon
shape in the Actions column. If you
submit your comments by mail or hand
delivery, submit them in an unbound
format, no larger than 81⁄2 by 11 inches,
suitable for copying and electronic
filing. If you submit them by mail and
would like to know that they reached
the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We
will consider all comments and material
received during the comment period
and may change the rule based on your
comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as
documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to
https://www.regulations.gov, select the
Advanced Docket Search option on the
right side of the screen, insert USCG–
2009–0120 in the Docket ID box, press
E:\FR\FM\27APP1.SGM
27APP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 79 (Monday, April 27, 2009)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19031-19034]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9575]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 165
[Docket No. USCG-2008-1180]
RIN 1625-AA00
Safety Zone; BWRC `300' Enduro; Lake Moolvalya, Parker, AZ
AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Coast Guard proposes a safety zone, on the navigable
waters of the Lake Moolvalya region on the lower Colorado River in
support of the Bluewater Resort and Casino `300' Enduro. This safety
zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the participants, crew,
spectators, participating vessels, and other vessels and users of the
waterway. Persons and vessels are prohibited from entering into,
transiting through, or anchoring within this safety zone unless
authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his designated
representative.
DATES: Comments and related material must either be submitted to our
Online docket via https://www.regulations.gov on or before May 27, 2009
or reach the Docket Management Facility by that date.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments identified by Coast Guard docket
number USCG-2008-1180 using any one of the following methods:
(1) Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
(2) Fax: 202-493-2251.
(3) Mail: Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. Department of
Transportation, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590-0001.
(4) Hand delivery: Same as mail address above, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. The telephone
number is 202-366-9329. To avoid duplication, please use only one of
these methods. For instructions on submitting comments, see the
``Public Participation and Request for Comments'' portion of
[[Page 19032]]
the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section below.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this proposed
rule, call Petty Officer Shane Jackson, USCG, Waterways Management,
U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego at (619) 278-2767. If you have
questions on viewing or submitting material to the docket, call Renee
V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Public Participation and Request for Comments
We encourage you to participate in this rulemaking by submitting
comments and related materials. All comments received will be posted,
without change, to https://www.regulations.gov and will include any
personal information you have provided.
Submitting Comments
If you submit a comment, please include the docket number for this
rulemaking (USCG-2008-1180), indicate the specific section of this
document to which each comment applies, and provide a reason for each
suggestion or recommendation. You may submit your comments and material
online, or by fax, mail or hand delivery, but please use only one of
these means. We recommend that you include your name and a mailing
address, an e-mail address, or a phone number in the body of your
document so that we can contact you if we have questions regarding your
submission.
To submit your comment Online, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the
screen, insert ``USCG-XXXX-XXXX'' in the Docket ID box, press Enter,
and then click on the balloon shape in the Actions column. If you
submit your comments by mail or hand delivery, submit them in an
unbound format, no larger than 8\1/2\ by 11 inches, suitable for
copying and electronic filing. If you submit them by mail and would
like to know that they reached the Facility, please enclose a stamped,
self-addressed postcard or envelope. We will consider all comments and
material received during the comment period and may change the rule
based on your comments.
Viewing Comments and Documents
To view comments, as well as documents mentioned in this preamble
as being available in the docket, go to https://www.regulations.gov,
select the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the
screen, insert USCG-2008-1180 in the Docket ID box, press Enter, and
then click on the item in the Docket ID column. You may also visit
either the Docket Management Facility in Room W12-140 on the ground
floor of the Department of Transportation West Building, 1200 New
Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays; or the U.S. Coast Guard
Sector San Diego, 2710 N. Harbor Drive, San Diego, CA 92101 between 8
a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. We
have an agreement with the Department of Transportation to use the
Docket Management Facility.
Privacy Act
Anyone can search the electronic form of all comments received into
any of our dockets by the name of the individual submitting the comment
(or signing the comment, if submitted on behalf of an association,
business, labor union, etc.). You may review the Department of
Transportation's Privacy Act notice regarding our public dockets in the
January 17, 2008 issue of the Federal Register (73 FR 3316).
Public Meeting
We do not now plan to hold a public meeting. But you may submit a
request for one to the Docket Management Facility at the address under
ADDRESSES explaining why one would be beneficial. If we determine that
one would aid this rulemaking, we will hold one at a time and place
announced by a later notice in the Federal Register.
Background and Purpose
RPM Racing Enterprises is sponsoring the Bluewater Resort and
Casino `300' Enduro. The event is a closed boat endurance race
consisting of 30 to 50 powerboats ranging from 16 to 26 feet in length.
The sponsor will provide four water rescue boats and eight patrol boats
for this event. This safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety
of the participants, crew, spectators, sponsor vessels, and other users
of the waterway.
Discussion of Proposed Rule
The Coast Guard proposes a safety zone that would be enforced from
6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on October 23, 2009 to October 25, 2009. The limits of
the safety zone would be as follows: The Headgate Dam at 34[deg]11.20
N., 114[deg]13.74 W. following the river northeast to 34[deg]11.76 N.,
114[deg]13.50 W.
This safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the
crews, spectators, and participants of the event and to protect other
vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and vessels will be
prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within
this safety zone unless authorized by the Captain of the Port, or his
designated representative.
Regulatory Analyses
We developed this proposed rule after considering numerous statutes
and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our
analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.
Regulatory Planning and Review
This proposed rule is not a ``significant regulatory action'' under
section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review,
and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits
under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and
Budget has not reviewed it under that Order.
We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. This
determination is based on the size and location of the safety zone.
Commercial vessels will not be hindered by the safety zone.
Recreational vessels will not be allowed to transit through the
designated safety zone during the specified times.
Small Entities
Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have
considered whether this proposed rule would have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small
entities'' comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations
that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their
fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than
50,000.
The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this proposed
rule would not have a significant economic impact on a substantial
number of small entities.
This proposed rule would affect the following entities, some of
which might be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels
intending to transit or anchor in the Lake Moolvalya region on the
lower Colorado River from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. on October 23, 2009 to
October 25, 2009.
This safety zone would not have a significant economic impact on a
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. This
rule would be in effect for twelve hours for a period of 3 days.
Although the safety zone would apply to the entire width of the
[[Page 19033]]
river, traffic would be allowed to pass through the zone with the
permission of the Coast Guard patrol commander. Before the effective
period, we will publish a local notice to mariners (LNM) and will issue
broadcast notice to mariners (BNM) alerts via marine channel 16 VFH
before the safety zone is enforced.
If you think that your business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction qualifies as a small entity and that this rule would have
a significant economic impact on it, please submit a comment (see
ADDRESSES) explaining why you think it qualifies and how and to what
degree this rule would economically affect it.
Assistance for Small Entities
Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we want to assist small
entities in understanding this proposed rule so that they can better
evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking. If the
rule would affect your small business, organization, or governmental
jurisdiction and you have questions concerning its provisions or
options for compliance, please contact Petty Officer Kristen Beer,
USCG, Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego at (619)
278-7233. The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities
that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of
the Coast Guard.
Collection of Information
This proposed rule would call for no new collection of information
under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520.).
Federalism
A rule has implications for Federalism under Executive Order 13132,
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this proposed rule
under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications
for Federalism.
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act
The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538)
requires Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any
one year. Though this proposed rule would not result in such an
expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this
preamble.
Taking of Private Property
This proposed rule would not effect a taking of private property or
otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630,
Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected
Property Rights.
Civil Justice Reform
This proposed rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and
3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize
litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.
Protection of Children
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13045,
Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and would not
create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that might
disproportionately affect children.
Indian Tribal Governments
This proposed rule does not have tribal implications under
Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal
Governments, because it would not have a substantial direct effect on
one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and
responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.
Energy Effects
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Executive Order 13211,
Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects
under Executive Order 13211.
Technical Standards
The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress,
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus
standards bodies.
This proposed rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we
did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards.
Environment
We have analyzed this proposed rule under Department of Homeland
Security Management Directive 0023.1 and Commandant Instruction
M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National
Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and
have made a preliminary determination that this action is one of a
category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a
significant effect on the human environment. A preliminary
``Environmental Analysis Check List'' supporting this preliminary
determination is available in the docket where indicated under
ADDRESSES. This proposed rule involves regulations that establish a
temporary safety zone to provide for the safety of personnel during the
BWRC `300' Enduro. We seek any comments or information that may lead to
the discovery of a significant environmental impact from this proposed
rule.
List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165
Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard proposes
to amend 33 CFR part 165 as follows:
PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as
follows:
Authority: 33 U.S.C. 122, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306,
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, and 160.5;
Pub. L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security
Delegation No. 0170.1.
2. Add temporary safety zone Sec. 165.T11-145 to read as follows:
[[Page 19034]]
Sec. 165.T11-145 Safety zone; BWRC `300' Enduro; Lake Moolvalya,
Parker, AZ.
(a) Location. The limits of the proposed safety zone are as
follows: the Headgate Dam at 34[deg]11.20 N., 114[deg]13.74 W.
following the river northeast to 34[deg]11.76 N., 114[deg]13.50 W.
(b) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 6 a.m.
to 6 p.m. on October 23, 2009 through October 25, 2009. If the event
concludes prior to the scheduled termination time, the Captain of the
Port will cease enforcement of this safety zone and will announce that
fact via Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
(c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section:
designated representative means any commissioned, warrant, and petty
officers of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard
Auxiliary, and local, State, and Federal law enforcement vessels who
have been authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
(d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain
of the Port of San Diego or his designated on-scene representative.
(2) Mariners requesting permission to transit through the safety
zone may request authorization to do so from the Patrol Commander
(PATCOM). The PATCOM may be contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16.
(3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated representative.
(4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by
siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel
shall proceed as directed.
(5) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other Federal, State, or
local agencies.
Dated: February 13, 2009.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. E9-9575 Filed 4-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P