Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Races; San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA, 18990-18992 [E9-9537]

Download as PDF 18990 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 79 / Monday, April 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations particular, Sections 3, 5, 5c(a) and 8a(5) of the Act, the Commission hereby amends Part 38 of Title 17 of the Code of Federal Regulations as follows: (v) A contract market shall disclose to the Commission which members of its board are public directors, and the basis for those determinations. of Food and Drugs and redelegated to the Center for Veterinary Medicine, 21 CFR part 526 is amended as follows: * PART 38—DESIGNATED CONTRACT MARKETS Issued in Washington, DC, on April 21, 2009 by the Commission. David A. Stawick, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. E9–9508 Filed 4–24–09; 8:45 am] PART 526—INTRAMAMMARY DOSAGE FORMS 1. The authority citation for part 38 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 7 U.S.C. 2, 5, 6, 6c, 7, 7a–2, and 12a, as amended by Appendix E of Public Law 106–554, 114 Stat. 2763A–365. * * * * 1. The authority citation for 21 CFR part 526 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 21 U.S.C. 360b. § 526.1696a BILLING CODE P [Amended] 2. In paragraph (c) of § 526.1696a, remove ‘‘050604’’ and add in its place ‘‘061623’’. ■ 2. The stay is lifted on paragraph (b) of Core Principle 15 in Appendix B to 17 CFR Part 38. ■ 3. In Appendix B to Part 38 revise paragraphs (b)(2)(ii) through (b)(2)(v) of Core Principle 15 to read as follows: DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 21 CFR Part 526 Dated: April 17, 2009. Bernadette Dunham, Director, Center for Veterinary Medicine. [FR Doc. E9–9527 Filed 4–24–09; 8:45 am] Appendix B to Part 38—Guidance on, and Acceptable Practices in, Compliance With Core Principles [Docket No. FDA–2009–N–0665] BILLING CODE 4160–01–S ■ * * * * * Food and Drug Administration Intramammary Dosage Forms; Change of Sponsor AGENCY: ACTION: Food and Drug Administration, HHS. * dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES Core Principle 15 of section 5(d) of the Act: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST * * * * (b) * * * (2) * * * (ii) In addition, a director shall be considered to have a ‘‘material relationship’’ with the contract market if any of the following circumstances exist: (A) The director is an officer or employee of the contract market or an officer or employee of its affiliate. In this context, ‘‘affiliate’’ includes parents or subsidiaries of the contract market or entities that share a common parent with the contract market; (B) The director is a member of the contract market, or an officer or director of a member. ‘‘Member’’ is defined according to Section 1a(24) of the Commodity Exchange Act and Commission Regulation 1.3(q); (C) The director, or a firm with which the director is an officer, director, or partner, receives more than $100,000 in combined annual payments from the contract market, or any affiliate of the contract market (as defined in Subsection (2)(ii)(A)), for legal, accounting, or consulting services. Compensation for services as a director of the contract market or as a director of an affiliate of the contract market does not count toward the $100,000 payment limit, nor does deferred compensation for services prior to becoming a director, so long as such compensation is in no way contingent, conditioned, or revocable; (D) Any of the relationships above apply to a member of the director’s ‘‘immediate family,’’ i.e., spouse, parents, children and siblings. (iii) All of the disqualifying circumstances described in Subsection (2)(ii) shall be subject to a one-year look back. (iv) A contract market’s public directors may also serve as directors of the contract market’s affiliate (as defined in Subsection (2)(ii)(A)) if they otherwise meet the definition of public director in this Section (2). VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:31 Apr 24, 2009 Jkt 217001 Coast Guard Final rule. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal drug regulations to reflect a change of sponsor for an approved new animal drug application (NADA) from Merial Ltd. to Cross Vetpharm Group Ltd. SUMMARY: DATES: This rule is effective April 27, 2009. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: David R. Newkirk, Center for Veterinary Medicine (HFV–100), Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl., Rockville, MD 20855, 240–276–8307, e-mail: david.newkirk@fda.hhs.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Merial Ltd., 3239 Satellite Blvd., Bldg. 500, Duluth, GA 30096–4640, has informed FDA that it has transferred ownership of, and all rights and interest in, NADA 065–383 for Formula A–34 (procaine penicillin G) mastitis infusion tube to Cross Vetpharm Group Ltd., Broomhill Rd., Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland. Accordingly, the agency is amending the regulations in 21 CFR 526.1696a to reflect the transfer of ownership. This rule does not meet the definition of ‘‘rule’’ in 5 U.S.C. 804(3)(A) because it is a rule of ‘‘particular applicability.’’ Therefore, it is not subject to the congressional review requirements in 5 U.S.C. 801–808. List of Subjects in 21 CFR Part 526 Animal drugs. Therefore, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and under authority delegated to the Commissioner ■ PO 00000 Frm 00014 Fmt 4700 DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY Sfmt 4700 33 CFR Part 165 [Docket No. USCG–2009–0119] RIN 1625–AA00 Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Races; San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA Coast Guard, DHS. Temporary final rule. AGENCY: ACTION: SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the navigable waters of the San Diego Bay in support of the Red Bull Air Races. The safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the crew, spectators, participants and other vessels and users of the waterway. Persons and vessels will be prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within this safety zone unless authorized to do so by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative. DATES: This rule is effective from 10 a.m. on May 7, 2009 through 6 p.m. on May 10, 2009. ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in the docket are part of docket USCG–2009– 0119 and are available Online by going to https://www.regulations.gov, selecting the Advanced Docket Search option on the right side of the screen, inserting USCG–2009–0119 in the Docket ID box, pressing Enter, and then clicking on the item in the Docket ID column. They are also available for inspection or copying at two locations: the Docket Management Facility (M–30), U.S. Department of Transportation, West E:\FR\FM\27APR1.SGM 27APR1 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 79 / Monday, April 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays, and the U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego, 2710 N. Harbor Dr., San Diego, CA 92101 between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this temporary rule, call Petty Officer Kristen Beer, USCG, Waterways Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego at (619) 278–7262. If you have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–9826. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Regulatory Information The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those procedures are ‘‘impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.’’ Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) with respect to this rule because immediate action is necessary to ensure the safety of spectators, crew, participants, and other users and vessels of the waterway in the vicinity of the event on the dates and times this rule will be in effect and delay would be contrary to the public interest. Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), for the same reasons as stated above, the Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES Background and Purpose The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the navigable waters of the San Diego Bay in support of the Red Bull Air Races. This safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the crew, spectators, participants, and other users and vessels of the waterway. Discussion of Rule The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone that will be enforced from 10 a.m. on May 7, 2009 to 6 p.m. on May 10, 2009. This safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the crew, spectators, participants, and other users and vessels of the waterway. Persons and vessels VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:31 Apr 24, 2009 Jkt 217001 18991 will be prohibited from entering into, transiting through, or anchoring within the safety zone unless authorized to do so by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative. The limits of the safety zone include all navigable waters within the following coordinates: 32°42.69′ N, 117°10.54′ W; 32°41.95′ N, 117°09.55′ W; 32°41.75′ N, 117°09.91′ W; thence north along the shoreline to 32°42.18′ N, 117°10.85′ N; 32°42.44′ N, 117°10.93′ W; 32°42.69′ N, 117°10.54′ W. Coast Guard personnel will enforce this safety zone. The Coast Guard may be assisted by other Federal, State, or local agencies, including the Coast Guard Auxiliary. Vessels or persons violating this section will be subject to both criminal and civil penalties. This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit or anchor in a portion of the San Diego Bay from 10 a.m. on May 7, 2009 to 6 p.m. on May 10, 2009. This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. Although the safety zone will apply to the entire width of the bay, traffic will be allowed to pass through the zone with the permission of the Coast Guard patrol commander. Before the effective period, the Coast Guard will publish a local notice to mariners (LNM) and broadcast notice to mariners (BNM) via marine channel 16. Regulatory Analyses Assistance for Small Entities Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104–121), we offer to assist small entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process. Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and rates each agency’s responsiveness to small business. If you wish to comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1– 888–REG–FAIR (1–888–734–3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or action of the Coast Guard. We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders. Regulatory Planning and Review This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not reviewed it under that Order. We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. This determination is based on the size and location of the safety zone. Recreational vessels will not be allowed to transit through the established safety zone during the specified times unless authorized to do so by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative. Small Entities Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601–612), we have considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. The term ‘‘small entities’’ comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000. The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities. PO 00000 Frm 00015 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 Collection of Information This rule calls for no new collection of information under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 3520). Federalism A rule has implications for Federalism under Executive Order 13132, Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for Federalism. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531–1538) requires E:\FR\FM\27APR1.SGM 27APR1 18992 Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 79 / Monday, April 27, 2009 / Rules and Regulations Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble. Taking of Private Property This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property Rights. Civil Justice Reform This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden. Protection of Children We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule is not an economically significant rule and does not create an environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may disproportionately affect children. Indian Tribal Governments This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal Government and Indian tribes. dwashington3 on PROD1PC60 with RULES Energy Effects We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ‘‘significant energy action’’ under that order because it is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects under Executive Order 13211. VerDate Nov<24>2008 14:31 Apr 24, 2009 Jkt 217001 § 165.T11–156 Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Races; San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA. Technical Standards The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards. Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus standards. Environment We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security Management Directive 0023.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321–4370f), and have concluded that this action is one of a category of actions which do not individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human environment. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2–1, paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction from further environmental documentation. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical exclusion determination are available in the docket where indicated under ADDRESSES. List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165 Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways. For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 CFR part 165 as follows: ■ PART 165—REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS 1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows: ■ Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05–1, 6.04–1, 6.04–6, 160.5; Pub. L. 107–295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security Delegation No. 0170.1. (a) Location. The limits of the safety zone include all navigable waters within the following coordinates: 32°42.69′ N, 117°10.54′ W; 32°41.95′ N, 117°09.55′ W; 32°41.75′ N, 117°09.91′ W; thence north along the shoreline to 32°42.18′ N, 117°10.85′ N; 32°42.44′ N, 117°10.93′ W; 32°42.69′ N, 117°10.54′ W. (b) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. on May 7, 2009 through May 10, 2009. If the event concludes prior to the scheduled termination time, the Captain of the Port will cease enforcement of this safety zone and will announce that fact via Broadcast Notice to Mariners. (c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section: designated representative, means any commissioned, warrant, and petty officers of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard Auxiliary, and local, state, and Federal law enforcement vessels who have been authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port. (d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain of the Port of San Diego or his designated on-scene representative. (2) Mariners requesting permission to transit through the safety zone may request authorization to do so from the Patrol Commander (PATCOM). The PATCOM may be contacted on VHF–FM Channel 16. (3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated representative. (4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel shall proceed as directed. (5) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other Federal, state, or local agencies. Dated: April 13, 2009. T.H. Farris, Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego. [FR Doc. E9–9537 Filed 4–24–09; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4910–15–P 2. Add a new temporary zone § 165.T11–156 to read as follows: ■ PO 00000 Frm 00016 Fmt 4700 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\27APR1.SGM 27APR1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 79 (Monday, April 27, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18990-18992]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9537]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Coast Guard

33 CFR Part 165

[Docket No. USCG-2009-0119]
RIN 1625-AA00


Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Races; San Diego Bay, San Diego, CA

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS.

ACTION: Temporary final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the 
navigable waters of the San Diego Bay in support of the Red Bull Air 
Races. The safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the 
crew, spectators, participants and other vessels and users of the 
waterway. Persons and vessels will be prohibited from entering into, 
transiting through, or anchoring within this safety zone unless 
authorized to do so by the Captain of the Port or his designated 
representative.

DATES: This rule is effective from 10 a.m. on May 7, 2009 through 6 
p.m. on May 10, 2009.

ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this preamble as being available in 
the docket are part of docket USCG-2009-0119 and are available Online 
by going to https://www.regulations.gov, selecting the Advanced Docket 
Search option on the right side of the screen, inserting USCG-2009-0119 
in the Docket ID box, pressing Enter, and then clicking on the item in 
the Docket ID column. They are also available for inspection or copying 
at two locations: the Docket Management Facility (M-30), U.S. 
Department of Transportation, West

[[Page 18991]]

Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE., 
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 
except Federal holidays, and the U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego, 
2710 N. Harbor Dr., San Diego, CA 92101 between 8 a.m. and 3 p.m., 
Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If you have questions on this 
temporary rule, call Petty Officer Kristen Beer, USCG, Waterways 
Management, U.S. Coast Guard Sector San Diego at (619) 278-7262. If you 
have questions on viewing the docket, call Renee V. Wright, Program 
Manager, Docket Operations, telephone 202-366-9826.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Regulatory Information

    The Coast Guard is issuing this temporary final rule without prior 
notice and opportunity to comment pursuant to authority under section 
4(a) of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) (5 U.S.C. 553(b)). This 
provision authorizes an agency to issue a rule without prior notice and 
opportunity to comment when the agency for good cause finds that those 
procedures are ``impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public 
interest.'' Under 5 U.S.C. 553(b)(B), the Coast Guard finds that good 
cause exists for not publishing a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) 
with respect to this rule because immediate action is necessary to 
ensure the safety of spectators, crew, participants, and other users 
and vessels of the waterway in the vicinity of the event on the dates 
and times this rule will be in effect and delay would be contrary to 
the public interest.
    Under 5 U.S.C. 553(d)(3), for the same reasons as stated above, the 
Coast Guard finds that good cause exists for making this rule effective 
less than 30 days after publication in the Federal Register.

Background and Purpose

    The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone on the 
navigable waters of the San Diego Bay in support of the Red Bull Air 
Races. This safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the 
crew, spectators, participants, and other users and vessels of the 
waterway.

Discussion of Rule

    The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary safety zone that will 
be enforced from 10 a.m. on May 7, 2009 to 6 p.m. on May 10, 2009. This 
safety zone is necessary to provide for the safety of the crew, 
spectators, participants, and other users and vessels of the waterway. 
Persons and vessels will be prohibited from entering into, transiting 
through, or anchoring within the safety zone unless authorized to do so 
by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative. The limits 
of the safety zone include all navigable waters within the following 
coordinates: 32[deg]42.69' N, 117[deg]10.54' W; 32[deg]41.95' N, 
117[deg]09.55' W; 32[deg]41.75' N, 117[deg]09.91' W; thence north along 
the shoreline to 32[deg]42.18' N, 117[deg]10.85' N; 32[deg]42.44' N, 
117[deg]10.93' W; 32[deg]42.69' N, 117[deg]10.54' W.
    Coast Guard personnel will enforce this safety zone. The Coast 
Guard may be assisted by other Federal, State, or local agencies, 
including the Coast Guard Auxiliary. Vessels or persons violating this 
section will be subject to both criminal and civil penalties.

Regulatory Analyses

    We developed this rule after considering numerous statutes and 
executive orders related to rulemaking. Below we summarize our analyses 
based on 13 of these statutes or executive orders.

Regulatory Planning and Review

    This rule is not a significant regulatory action under section 3(f) 
of Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, and does not 
require an assessment of potential costs and benefits under section 
6(a)(3) of that Order. The Office of Management and Budget has not 
reviewed it under that Order.
    We expect the economic impact of this proposed rule to be so 
minimal that a full Regulatory Evaluation is unnecessary. This 
determination is based on the size and location of the safety zone. 
Recreational vessels will not be allowed to transit through the 
established safety zone during the specified times unless authorized to 
do so by the Captain of the Port or his designated representative.

Small Entities

    Under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601-612), we have 
considered whether this rule would have a significant economic impact 
on a substantial number of small entities. The term ``small entities'' 
comprises small businesses, not-for-profit organizations that are 
independently owned and operated and are not dominant in their fields, 
and governmental jurisdictions with populations of less than 50,000.
    The Coast Guard certifies under 5 U.S.C. 605(b) that this rule will 
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small 
entities.
    This rule will affect the following entities, some of which may be 
small entities: The owners or operators of vessels intending to transit 
or anchor in a portion of the San Diego Bay from 10 a.m. on May 7, 2009 
to 6 p.m. on May 10, 2009.
    This safety zone will not have a significant economic impact on a 
substantial number of small entities for the following reasons. 
Although the safety zone will apply to the entire width of the bay, 
traffic will be allowed to pass through the zone with the permission of 
the Coast Guard patrol commander. Before the effective period, the 
Coast Guard will publish a local notice to mariners (LNM) and broadcast 
notice to mariners (BNM) via marine channel 16.

Assistance for Small Entities

    Under section 213(a) of the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement 
Fairness Act of 1996 (Pub. L. 104-121), we offer to assist small 
entities in understanding the rule so that they can better evaluate its 
effects on them and participate in the rulemaking process.
    Small businesses may send comments on the actions of Federal 
employees who enforce, or otherwise determine compliance with, Federal 
regulations to the Small Business and Agriculture Regulatory 
Enforcement Ombudsman and the Regional Small Business Regulatory 
Fairness Boards. The Ombudsman evaluates these actions annually and 
rates each agency's responsiveness to small business. If you wish to 
comment on actions by employees of the Coast Guard, call 1-888-REG-FAIR 
(1-888-734-3247). The Coast Guard will not retaliate against small 
entities that question or complain about this rule or any policy or 
action of the Coast Guard.

Collection of Information

    This rule calls for no new collection of information under the 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501-3520).

Federalism

    A rule has implications for Federalism under Executive Order 13132, 
Federalism, if it has a substantial direct effect on State or local 
governments and would either preempt State law or impose a substantial 
direct cost of compliance on them. We have analyzed this rule under 
that Order and have determined that it does not have implications for 
Federalism.

Unfunded Mandates Reform Act

    The Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (2 U.S.C. 1531-1538) 
requires

[[Page 18992]]

Federal agencies to assess the effects of their discretionary 
regulatory actions. In particular, the Act addresses actions that may 
result in the expenditure by a State, local, or tribal government, in 
the aggregate, or by the private sector of $100,000,000 or more in any 
one year. Though this rule will not result in such an expenditure, we 
do discuss the effects of this rule elsewhere in this preamble.

Taking of Private Property

    This rule will not effect a taking of private property or otherwise 
have taking implications under Executive Order 12630, Governmental 
Actions and Interference with Constitutionally Protected Property 
Rights.

Civil Justice Reform

    This rule meets applicable standards in sections 3(a) and 3(b)(2) 
of Executive Order 12988, Civil Justice Reform, to minimize litigation, 
eliminate ambiguity, and reduce burden.

Protection of Children

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13045, Protection 
of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety Risks. This rule 
is not an economically significant rule and does not create an 
environmental risk to health or risk to safety that may 
disproportionately affect children.

Indian Tribal Governments

    This rule does not have tribal implications under Executive Order 
13175, Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribal Governments, 
because it does not have a substantial direct effect on one or more 
Indian tribes, on the relationship between the Federal Government and 
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities 
between the Federal Government and Indian tribes.

Energy Effects

    We have analyzed this rule under Executive Order 13211, Actions 
Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, 
Distribution, or Use. We have determined that it is not a ``significant 
energy action'' under that order because it is not a ``significant 
regulatory action'' under Executive Order 12866 and is not likely to 
have a significant adverse effect on the supply, distribution, or use 
of energy. The Administrator of the Office of Information and 
Regulatory Affairs has not designated it as a significant energy 
action. Therefore, it does not require a Statement of Energy Effects 
under Executive Order 13211.

Technical Standards

    The National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA) (15 
U.S.C. 272 note) directs agencies to use voluntary consensus standards 
in their regulatory activities unless the agency provides Congress, 
through the Office of Management and Budget, with an explanation of why 
using these standards would be inconsistent with applicable law or 
otherwise impractical. Voluntary consensus standards are technical 
standards (e.g., specifications of materials, performance, design, or 
operation; test methods; sampling procedures; and related management 
systems practices) that are developed or adopted by voluntary consensus 
standards bodies. This rule does not use technical standards. 
Therefore, we did not consider the use of voluntary consensus 
standards.

Environment

    We have analyzed this rule under Department of Homeland Security 
Management Directive 0023.1 and Commandant Instruction M16475.lD, which 
guide the Coast Guard in complying with the National Environmental 
Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) (42 U.S.C. 4321-4370f), and have concluded 
that this action is one of a category of actions which do not 
individually or cumulatively have a significant effect on the human 
environment. This rule is categorically excluded, under figure 2-1, 
paragraph (34)(g), of the Instruction from further environmental 
documentation. An environmental analysis checklist and a categorical 
exclusion determination are available in the docket where indicated 
under ADDRESSES.

List of Subjects in 33 CFR Part 165

    Harbors, Marine safety, Navigation (water), Reporting and 
recordkeeping requirements, Security measures, Waterways.


0
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Coast Guard amends 33 
CFR part 165 as follows:

PART 165--REGULATED NAVIGATION AREAS AND LIMITED ACCESS AREAS

0
1. The authority citation for part 165 continues to read as follows:

    Authority: 33 U.S.C. 1226, 1231; 46 U.S.C. Chapter 701, 3306, 
3703; 50 U.S.C. 191, 195; 33 CFR 1.05-1, 6.04-1, 6.04-6, 160.5; Pub. 
L. 107-295, 116 Stat. 2064; Department of Homeland Security 
Delegation No. 0170.1.


0
2. Add a new temporary zone Sec.  165.T11-156 to read as follows:


Sec.  165.T11-156  Safety Zone; Red Bull Air Races; San Diego Bay, San 
Diego, CA.

    (a) Location. The limits of the safety zone include all navigable 
waters within the following coordinates: 32[deg]42.69' N, 
117[deg]10.54' W; 32[deg]41.95' N, 117[deg]09.55' W; 32[deg]41.75' N, 
117[deg]09.91' W; thence north along the shoreline to 32[deg]42.18' N, 
117[deg]10.85' N; 32[deg]42.44' N, 117[deg]10.93' W; 32[deg]42.69' N, 
117[deg]10.54' W.
    (b) Enforcement Period. This section will be enforced from 10 a.m. 
to 6 p.m. on May 7, 2009 through May 10, 2009. If the event concludes 
prior to the scheduled termination time, the Captain of the Port will 
cease enforcement of this safety zone and will announce that fact via 
Broadcast Notice to Mariners.
    (c) Definitions. The following definition applies to this section: 
designated representative, means any commissioned, warrant, and petty 
officers of the Coast Guard on board Coast Guard, Coast Guard 
Auxiliary, and local, state, and Federal law enforcement vessels who 
have been authorized to act on the behalf of the Captain of the Port.
    (d) Regulations. (1) Entry into, transit through or anchoring 
within this safety zone is prohibited unless authorized by the Captain 
of the Port of San Diego or his designated on-scene representative.
    (2) Mariners requesting permission to transit through the safety 
zone may request authorization to do so from the Patrol Commander 
(PATCOM). The PATCOM may be contacted on VHF-FM Channel 16.
    (3) All persons and vessels shall comply with the instructions of 
the Coast Guard Captain of the Port or the designated representative.
    (4) Upon being hailed by U.S. Coast Guard patrol personnel by 
siren, radio, flashing light, or other means, the operator of a vessel 
shall proceed as directed.
    (5) The Coast Guard may be assisted by other Federal, state, or 
local agencies.

    Dated: April 13, 2009.
T.H. Farris,
Captain, U.S. Coast Guard, Captain of the Port San Diego.
[FR Doc. E9-9537 Filed 4-24-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-15-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.