Substances Prohibited From Use in Animal Food or Feed; Confirmation of Effective Date of Final Rule, 18626-18628 [E9-9466]
Download as PDF
18626
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 78 / Friday, April 24, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
Applicability
These special conditions will apply
only to the GEnx–2B series turbofan
engine models. If GE applies later for a
change to the type certificate to include
another model incorporating the same
novel or unusual fan blade design
features, these special conditions may
also become part of the type
certification basis of that engine model
series as well.
Conclusion
This action affects only the carbon
fiber composite fan blade design
features on the GEnx–2B series turbofan
engine models. It is not a rule of general
applicability, and it affects only the
General Electric Company which has
applied to the FAA for certification of
these fan blade design features.
List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 33
Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation
safety, Safety.
The authority citation for these
special conditions continues to read as
follows:
tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES
Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701–
44702, 44704.
The Special Conditions
Accordingly, pursuant to the
authority delegated to me by the
Administrator, the following special
conditions are issued as part of the type
certification basis for the derivative
GEnx–2B series turbofan engines.
1. In lieu of the fan blade containment
test with the fan blade failing at the
outermost retention groove as specified
in § 33.94(a)(1), complete the following
requirements:
(a) Conduct a fan blade containment
test that is acceptable to the
Administrator, with the fan blade failing
at the inner annulus flow path line.
(b) Substantiate by test and analyses,
or other methods acceptable to the
Administrator, that the engine is
capable of containing damage without
catching fire and without failure of its
mounting attachments when operated
for at least 15 seconds, unless the
resulting engine damage induces a self
shutdown that initiates within 15
seconds of the fan blade failure.
(c) Substantiate by test and analyses,
or other methods acceptable to the
Administrator, that a minimum material
properties fan disk and fan blade
retention system can withstand without
failure a centrifugal load equal to two
times the maximum load which the
retention system could experience
within approved engine operating
limitations.
(d) Using a procedure approved by the
Administrator, establish an operating
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:46 Apr 23, 2009
Jkt 217001
limitation that specifies the maximum
allowable number of start-stop stress
cycles for the fan blade retention
system. The life evaluation shall include
the combined effects of high cycle and
low cycle fatigue. If the operating
limitation is less than 100,000 cycles,
that limitation must be specified in
Chapter 05 of the Engine Manual
Airworthiness Limitation Section. The
fan blade retention system includes the
portion of the fan blade from the inner
annulus flow path line inward to the
blade dovetail, the blade retention
components, and the fan disk and fan
blade attachment features.
(e) Substantiate that, during the
service life of the engine, the total
probability of the occurrence of a
hazardous engine effect defined in
§ 33.75 due to an individual blade
retention system failure resulting from
all possible causes will be extremely
improbable, with a cumulative
calculated probability of failure of less
than 10 per engine flight hour.
(f) Substantiate by test or analysis
acceptable to the Administrator that not
only will the engine continue to meet
the requirements of § 33.75 following a
lightning strike on the composite fan
blade structure, but the lightning strike
will also not cause damage to the fan
blades that would prevent continued
safe operation of the affected engine.
(g) Account for the effects of inservice deterioration, manufacturing
variations, minimum material
properties, and environmental effects
during the tests and analyses required
by paragraphs (a), (b), (c), (d), (e), and
(f) of these special conditions.
(h) Propose fleet leader monitoring
and field sampling programs for the
GEnx–2B engine fan blades that will
monitor the effects of usage on fan blade
and retention system integrity. The
sampling program should use the
experience gained on current GE90 and
GEnx–1B engine model series
monitoring programs, and must be
approved by the FAA prior to
certification of the GEnx–2B engine
models.
Issued in Burlington, Massachusetts, on
April 13, 2009.
Peter A. White,
Acting Manager, Engine and Propeller
Directorate, Aircraft Certification Service.
[FR Doc. E9–9262 Filed 4–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910–13–M
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 589
[Docket No. FDA–2002–N–0031] (formerly
Docket No. 2002N–0273)
RIN 0910–AF46
Substances Prohibited From Use in
Animal Food or Feed; Confirmation of
Effective Date of Final Rule
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration,
HHS.
ACTION: Final rule; confirmation of
effective date.
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) is confirming the
effective date of April 27, 2009, for the
final rule that published in the Federal
Register of April 25, 2008 (73 FR
22720), entitled ‘‘Substances Prohibited
From Use in Animal Food or Feed.’’ The
agency is also establishing a compliance
date of October 26, 2009, for this rule in
order to allow additional time for
renderers to comply with the new
requirements. This additional time will
also give other affected persons,
including cattle producers and packers,
more time to identify appropriate
methods for disposing of material
prohibited from use in animal feed by
this rule.
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date
of the final rule published in the
Federal Register of April 25, 2008 (73
FR 22720), is April 27, 2009.
Compliance Date: The compliance
date is October 26, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Burt
Pritchett, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–222), Food and Drug
Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240–453–6860,
e-mail: burt.pritchett@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of April 25,
2008, FDA published a final rule
entitled ‘‘Substances Prohibited From
Use in Animal Food or Feed’’ (referred
to herein as the April 25, 2008, final
rule), that would become effective 1
year after the April 27, 2009, date of
publication. These measures were
established to further strengthen
existing safeguards against bovine
spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). FDA
recently became aware that some
affected persons are experiencing
difficulties modifying their operations
to comply with the new requirements
contained in the April 25, 2008, final
E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM
24APR1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 78 / Friday, April 24, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
rule and, therefore, may not be in full
compliance by the April 27, 2009,
effective date. Accordingly, in the
Federal Register of April 9, 2009 (74 FR
16160) (referred to herein as the April
9, 2009, proposal), FDA published a
proposal that would delay the effective
date of the April 25, 2008, final rule for
60 days and provided a period for
public comment on this proposal of 7
days.
tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES
II. Comments
The agency received comments from
over 400 organizations and individuals
on the April 9, 2009, proposal. Many
comments were received from state and
national cattle producer organizations,
as well as from individual cattle
producers. A large number of individual
consumers also submitted comments.
Comments were also received from
renderers, meat processors, dairy
organizations, and State agriculture
agencies.
Those opposed to a delay of the
effective date primarily cited a
heightened risk of BSE to U.S.
consumers and the U.S. cattle herd from
imports of live Canadian cattle,
particularly those cattle over 30 months
of age. Most of these comments also
noted that the current U.S. feed ban
implemented in 1997 is comparable to
the initial Canadian feed ban, also
implemented in 1997, which, according
to these comments, has proven to be
ineffective at preventing the spread of
BSE in Canada. This position was
echoed in the many comments received
from persons concerned with
Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease.
Those in favor of a delay of the
effective date cited the need for more
time to identify alternative methods of
disposal of cattle material prohibited in
animal feed (CMPAF) from slaughter
and dead stock cattle in areas of the
country where rendering services are
curtailed or no longer available because
of the rule. Some renderers and dead
stock haulers commented that they were
choosing to discontinue picking up
dead cattle due to difficulties complying
with the new rule. Many of the
comments suggested that the proposed
60-day delay was not adequate with
some comments suggesting delays of 6
months to 1 year. Also, a number of
comments asked that the effective date
be delayed indefinitely until the carcass
disposal problem was more fully
resolved. Several comments urged FDA
to work with other Government agencies
to develop a disposal plan for CMPAF
and dead stock cattle before
implementing the rule.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:46 Apr 23, 2009
Jkt 217001
III. Discussion
FDA continues to believe that the new
measures contained in the April 25,
2008, final rule are necessary to further
strengthen existing safeguards against
BSE. The underlying bases for these
new measures were fully considered
through the notice and comment
rulemaking process. (See the October 6,
2005, proposed rule (70 FR 58570) and
the April 25, 2008, final rule).
The April 9, 2009, proposal to delay
the effective date was issued solely for
the purpose of considering whether a
delay should be provided to allow time
to address concerns that some entities
were not adequately prepared to comply
with the April 25, 2008, final rule and
that adequate alternative carcass
disposal methods had not been
developed. Therefore, any delay in the
implementation of this rule is intended
to help address these concerns and is
not intended to signal that the agency is
reconsidering the final rule. Based on
the significant number of comments that
oppose delaying the effective date of the
April 25, 2008, final rule due to public
and animal health concerns, FDA is
confirming the original April 27, 2009,
effective date of the final rule. However,
although the final rule is effective on
April 27, 2009, FDA has decided to
establish a compliance date of October
26, 2009, for those who need it, to help
address the compliance and
implementation concerns.
In its rulemaking, FDA acknowledged
that alternative disposal methods for
CMPAF and dead stock cattle would be
needed for a substantial volume of
material that would be diverted from
animal feed use by the new
requirements. Accordingly, the rule
provided a 12–month delayed effective
date to allow sufficient time to arrange
for alternative disposal. Where services
to remove brain and spinal cord will not
be available, such arrangements might
include composting dead stock cattle, or
disposing of dead stock cattle in
landfills. To some extent, we believe the
rendering, livestock, meat, and animal
feed industries have addressed many of
the compliance and carcass disposal
challenges and are prepared to meet the
April 27, 2009, effective date of the final
rule.
By affirming the April 27, 2009,
effective date, renderers can begin
putting the new BSE safeguards into
place by removing the prohibited cattle
materials from the animal feed chain.
However, it is apparent from the
comments that a significant number of
other stakeholders will not be ready to
deal effectively with the new regulation
when it goes into effect on April 27,
PO 00000
Frm 00007
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
18627
2009. In particular, smaller entities such
as dead stock haulers, small meat
processors, and some livestock
producers have only recently become
aware that their current disposal
arrangements will no longer be
available, or will be available at
increased cost, as a result of the April
25, 2008, final rule. In addition,
comments from certain State agencies
have indicated that adequate alternative
measures have not yet been developed
for disposing of animal carcasses,
particularly in areas where rendering is
limited or may no longer be available.
Generally, the disposal of animal
carcasses is regulated at the State and
local level. For example, State law may
dictate whether dead animals can be
buried or composted, or whether an
incinerator needs to be approved before
one is built. Furthermore, some landfill
operators have indicated that they do
not intend to accept dead animals or
CMPAF because they consider it to be
hazardous material. FDA has consulted
with the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) on this issue and EPA has
recently published a statement on its
Web site stating that, under the
Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA), EPA considers CMPAF to
be solid waste, not hazardous waste
(https://www.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/
municipal/landfill/cattle.htm). (FDA
has verified the Web site address, but
FDA is not responsible for any
subsequent changes to the Web site after
this document publishes in the Federal
Register.)
Based on a consideration of all
comments received in response to the
April 9, 2009, proposal, FDA believes
the most appropriate action is to
confirm the April 27, 2009, effective
date, and delay compliance until
October 26, 2009. Confirming the April
27, 2009, effective date conveys the
agency’s clear intent to move forward
with the implementation of the new
measures. As stated previously, some
affected parties are prepared to begin
implementation. Providing for a 6–
month delay for compliance
acknowledges the significant number of
affected stakeholders who will require
more time to comply with the new
regulation or adjust to the loss of
rendering service. For renderers, who
are directly impacted by this regulation,
this means modifying their operations to
effectively separate and dispose of
CMPAF. For cattle producers, who are
also impacted by this regulation, this
may mean finding alternative means of
disposing of dead stock cattle if
rendering services are no longer
available to them.
E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM
24APR1
18628
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 78 / Friday, April 24, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
FDA acknowledges that carcass
disposal problems exist in certain states
or regions and that developing and
implementing adequate solutions to
these problems is challenging.
Furthermore, FDA recognizes that in
certain circumstances it may be
particularly challenging to address such
disposal problems by the October 26,
2009, compliance date. FDA intends to
finalize the Draft Small Entities
Compliance Guide for Renderers that
was issued on November 26, 2008. In
addition, FDA intends to engage in
further outreach to the rendering
industry, pertinent State agencies, and
others affected by the rule. FDA is
committed to working with all affected
parties to the extent possible to assist
efforts in mitigating the impacts
associated with implementation of the
rule.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Director Charles B. Shotwell, Office of
Defense Trade Controls Policy,
Department of State, Telephone (202)
663–2792 or Fax (202) 261–8199; e-mail
DDTCResponseTeam@state.gov. ATTN:
Regulatory Change, Category XII.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
Department of State published a final
rule (Public Notice 4723) in the Federal
Register of May 21, 2004, amending
Category XII of the United States
Munitions List. This document restores
the language in the note after Category
XII(c).
IV. Conclusion
PART 121—THE UNITED STATES
MUNITIONS LIST
At this time, the agency is confirming
the April 27, 2009, effective date of the
final rule published in the Federal
Register of April 25, 2008, entitled
‘‘Substances Prohibited From Use in
Animal Food or Feed.’’ The agency is
also establishing a compliance date of
October 26, 2009, for this rule in order
to allow additional time for affected
persons to comply with the new
requirements.
Dated: April 21, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and
Planning.
[FR Doc. E9–9466 Filed 4–22–09; 11:15 am]
List of Subjects in 22 CFR Part 121
Arms and munitions, Exports, U.S.
Munitions List.
■ Accordingly, 22 CFR part 121 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendment:
1. The authority citation for part 121
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: Secs. 2, 38, and 71, Public Law
90–629, 90 Stat. 744 (22 U.S.C. 2752, 2778,
2797); E.O. 11958, 42 FR 4311; 3 CFR, 1977
Comp. p. 79; 22 U.S.C. 2651a; Public Law
105–261, 112 Stat. 1920.
2. In § 121.1(c), Category XII, amend
after paragraph (c) by adding a note to
read as follows:
■
§ 121.1 General. The United States
Munitions List.
*
(c) * * *
*
*
*
*
BILLING CODE 4160–01–S
Category XII—Fire Control, Range
Finder, Optical and Guidance and
Control Equipment
DEPARTMENT OF STATE
*
22 CFR Part 121
[Public Notice 6589]
Amendment to the International Arms
Traffic in Arms Regulations: The
United States Munitions List;
Correction
Department of State.
Correcting amendment.
AGENCY:
tjames on PRODPC75 with RULES
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Department of State
published a final rule in the Federal
Register on May 21, 2004 (69 FR 29222),
revising Category XII(c) of the United
States Munitions List. A technical error
in that rule resulted in the unintended
removal of language in a note after
Category XII paragraph (c). This
document corrects the final regulations
by restoring the language in the note.
DATES: Effective on April 24, 2009.
VerDate Nov<24>2008
14:46 Apr 23, 2009
Jkt 217001
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
Note: Special Definition. For purposes of
this subparagraph, second and third
generation image intensification tubes are
defined as having:
A peak response within the 0.4 to 1.05
micron wavelength range and incorporating a
microchannel plate for electron image
amplification having a hold pitch (center-tocenter spacing) of less than 25 microns and
having either:
(a) An S–20, S–25 or multialkali
photocathode; or
(b) A GaAs, GaInAs, or other
compound semiconductor
photocathode.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: April 13, 2009.
Frank J. Ruggiero,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Political
Military Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. E9–9291 Filed 4–23–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710–25–P
PO 00000
Frm 00008
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND
SECURITY
Coast Guard
33 CFR Part 117
[Docket No. USCG–2009–0132]
RIN 1625–AA09
Drawbridge Operation Regulation;
Keweenaw Waterway, Houghton, MI
Coast Guard, DHS.
Temporary final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The Commander, Ninth Coast
Guard District, has approved a
temporary deviation from the
regulations governing the operation of
the U.S. 41 (Sheldon Avenue) Lift
Bridge, at Mile 16.0, across the
Keweenaw Waterway, in Houghton, MI.
Under this temporary deviation, the
U.S. 41 (Sheldon Avenue) Lift Bridge
will be allowed to remain in the closedto-navigation position during specific
dates and times. The deviation is
necessary to perform reconstruction to
the city streets that access the U.S. 41
(Sheldon Avenue) Lift Bridge.
DATES: This temporary final rule is
effective from 6 a.m. on April 15, 2009,
to 6 p.m. on November 15, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Documents indicated in this
preamble as being available in the
docket, are part of docket USCG–2009–
0132 and are available online by going
to https://www.regulations.gov, selecting
the Advanced Docket Search option on
the right side of the screen, inserting
USCG–2009–0132 in the Docket ID box,
pressing Enter, and then clicking on the
item in the Docket ID column. This
material is also available for inspection
or copying at two locations: the Docket
Management Facility (M–30), U.S.
Department of Transportation, West
Building Ground Floor, Room W12–140,
1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.,
Washington, DC 20590, between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If
you have questions on this temporary
rule, call or e-mail Blair Stanifer, Bridge
Management Specialist, Ninth Coast
Guard District, at (216) 902–6086, e-mail
William.B.Stanifer@uscg.mil. If you
have questions on viewing the docket,
call Renee V. Wright, Program Manager,
Docket Operations, telephone 202–366–
9826.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Regulatory Information
The Coast Guard is issuing this
temporary final rule without prior
notice and opportunity to comment
E:\FR\FM\24APR1.SGM
24APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 78 (Friday, April 24, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18626-18628]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9466]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Food and Drug Administration
21 CFR Part 589
[Docket No. FDA-2002-N-0031] (formerly Docket No. 2002N-0273)
RIN 0910-AF46
Substances Prohibited From Use in Animal Food or Feed;
Confirmation of Effective Date of Final Rule
AGENCY: Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION: Final rule; confirmation of effective date.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is confirming the
effective date of April 27, 2009, for the final rule that published in
the Federal Register of April 25, 2008 (73 FR 22720), entitled
``Substances Prohibited From Use in Animal Food or Feed.'' The agency
is also establishing a compliance date of October 26, 2009, for this
rule in order to allow additional time for renderers to comply with the
new requirements. This additional time will also give other affected
persons, including cattle producers and packers, more time to identify
appropriate methods for disposing of material prohibited from use in
animal feed by this rule.
DATES: Effective Date: The effective date of the final rule published
in the Federal Register of April 25, 2008 (73 FR 22720), is April 27,
2009.
Compliance Date: The compliance date is October 26, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Burt Pritchett, Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV-222), Food and Drug Administration, 7519 Standish Pl.,
Rockville, MD 20855, 240-453-6860, e-mail: burt.pritchett@fda.hhs.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
In the Federal Register of April 25, 2008, FDA published a final
rule entitled ``Substances Prohibited From Use in Animal Food or Feed''
(referred to herein as the April 25, 2008, final rule), that would
become effective 1 year after the April 27, 2009, date of publication.
These measures were established to further strengthen existing
safeguards against bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE). FDA recently
became aware that some affected persons are experiencing difficulties
modifying their operations to comply with the new requirements
contained in the April 25, 2008, final
[[Page 18627]]
rule and, therefore, may not be in full compliance by the April 27,
2009, effective date. Accordingly, in the Federal Register of April 9,
2009 (74 FR 16160) (referred to herein as the April 9, 2009, proposal),
FDA published a proposal that would delay the effective date of the
April 25, 2008, final rule for 60 days and provided a period for public
comment on this proposal of 7 days.
II. Comments
The agency received comments from over 400 organizations and
individuals on the April 9, 2009, proposal. Many comments were received
from state and national cattle producer organizations, as well as from
individual cattle producers. A large number of individual consumers
also submitted comments. Comments were also received from renderers,
meat processors, dairy organizations, and State agriculture agencies.
Those opposed to a delay of the effective date primarily cited a
heightened risk of BSE to U.S. consumers and the U.S. cattle herd from
imports of live Canadian cattle, particularly those cattle over 30
months of age. Most of these comments also noted that the current U.S.
feed ban implemented in 1997 is comparable to the initial Canadian feed
ban, also implemented in 1997, which, according to these comments, has
proven to be ineffective at preventing the spread of BSE in Canada.
This position was echoed in the many comments received from persons
concerned with Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease.
Those in favor of a delay of the effective date cited the need for
more time to identify alternative methods of disposal of cattle
material prohibited in animal feed (CMPAF) from slaughter and dead
stock cattle in areas of the country where rendering services are
curtailed or no longer available because of the rule. Some renderers
and dead stock haulers commented that they were choosing to discontinue
picking up dead cattle due to difficulties complying with the new rule.
Many of the comments suggested that the proposed 60-day delay was not
adequate with some comments suggesting delays of 6 months to 1 year.
Also, a number of comments asked that the effective date be delayed
indefinitely until the carcass disposal problem was more fully
resolved. Several comments urged FDA to work with other Government
agencies to develop a disposal plan for CMPAF and dead stock cattle
before implementing the rule.
III. Discussion
FDA continues to believe that the new measures contained in the
April 25, 2008, final rule are necessary to further strengthen existing
safeguards against BSE. The underlying bases for these new measures
were fully considered through the notice and comment rulemaking
process. (See the October 6, 2005, proposed rule (70 FR 58570) and the
April 25, 2008, final rule).
The April 9, 2009, proposal to delay the effective date was issued
solely for the purpose of considering whether a delay should be
provided to allow time to address concerns that some entities were not
adequately prepared to comply with the April 25, 2008, final rule and
that adequate alternative carcass disposal methods had not been
developed. Therefore, any delay in the implementation of this rule is
intended to help address these concerns and is not intended to signal
that the agency is reconsidering the final rule. Based on the
significant number of comments that oppose delaying the effective date
of the April 25, 2008, final rule due to public and animal health
concerns, FDA is confirming the original April 27, 2009, effective date
of the final rule. However, although the final rule is effective on
April 27, 2009, FDA has decided to establish a compliance date of
October 26, 2009, for those who need it, to help address the compliance
and implementation concerns.
In its rulemaking, FDA acknowledged that alternative disposal
methods for CMPAF and dead stock cattle would be needed for a
substantial volume of material that would be diverted from animal feed
use by the new requirements. Accordingly, the rule provided a 12-month
delayed effective date to allow sufficient time to arrange for
alternative disposal. Where services to remove brain and spinal cord
will not be available, such arrangements might include composting dead
stock cattle, or disposing of dead stock cattle in landfills. To some
extent, we believe the rendering, livestock, meat, and animal feed
industries have addressed many of the compliance and carcass disposal
challenges and are prepared to meet the April 27, 2009, effective date
of the final rule.
By affirming the April 27, 2009, effective date, renderers can
begin putting the new BSE safeguards into place by removing the
prohibited cattle materials from the animal feed chain. However, it is
apparent from the comments that a significant number of other
stakeholders will not be ready to deal effectively with the new
regulation when it goes into effect on April 27, 2009. In particular,
smaller entities such as dead stock haulers, small meat processors, and
some livestock producers have only recently become aware that their
current disposal arrangements will no longer be available, or will be
available at increased cost, as a result of the April 25, 2008, final
rule. In addition, comments from certain State agencies have indicated
that adequate alternative measures have not yet been developed for
disposing of animal carcasses, particularly in areas where rendering is
limited or may no longer be available. Generally, the disposal of
animal carcasses is regulated at the State and local level. For
example, State law may dictate whether dead animals can be buried or
composted, or whether an incinerator needs to be approved before one is
built. Furthermore, some landfill operators have indicated that they do
not intend to accept dead animals or CMPAF because they consider it to
be hazardous material. FDA has consulted with the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) on this issue and EPA has recently published a
statement on its Web site stating that, under the Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (RCRA), EPA considers CMPAF to be solid waste, not
hazardous waste (https://www.epa.gov/epawaste/nonhaz/municipal/landfill/cattle.htm). (FDA has verified the Web site address, but FDA is not
responsible for any subsequent changes to the Web site after this
document publishes in the Federal Register.)
Based on a consideration of all comments received in response to
the April 9, 2009, proposal, FDA believes the most appropriate action
is to confirm the April 27, 2009, effective date, and delay compliance
until October 26, 2009. Confirming the April 27, 2009, effective date
conveys the agency's clear intent to move forward with the
implementation of the new measures. As stated previously, some affected
parties are prepared to begin implementation. Providing for a 6-month
delay for compliance acknowledges the significant number of affected
stakeholders who will require more time to comply with the new
regulation or adjust to the loss of rendering service. For renderers,
who are directly impacted by this regulation, this means modifying
their operations to effectively separate and dispose of CMPAF. For
cattle producers, who are also impacted by this regulation, this may
mean finding alternative means of disposing of dead stock cattle if
rendering services are no longer available to them.
[[Page 18628]]
FDA acknowledges that carcass disposal problems exist in certain
states or regions and that developing and implementing adequate
solutions to these problems is challenging. Furthermore, FDA recognizes
that in certain circumstances it may be particularly challenging to
address such disposal problems by the October 26, 2009, compliance
date. FDA intends to finalize the Draft Small Entities Compliance Guide
for Renderers that was issued on November 26, 2008. In addition, FDA
intends to engage in further outreach to the rendering industry,
pertinent State agencies, and others affected by the rule. FDA is
committed to working with all affected parties to the extent possible
to assist efforts in mitigating the impacts associated with
implementation of the rule.
IV. Conclusion
At this time, the agency is confirming the April 27, 2009,
effective date of the final rule published in the Federal Register of
April 25, 2008, entitled ``Substances Prohibited From Use in Animal
Food or Feed.'' The agency is also establishing a compliance date of
October 26, 2009, for this rule in order to allow additional time for
affected persons to comply with the new requirements.
Dated: April 21, 2009.
Jeffrey Shuren,
Associate Commissioner for Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. E9-9466 Filed 4-22-09; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-01-S