Occupational Radiation Protection; Correction, 18116 [E9-9097]
Download as PDF
18116
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 75 / Tuesday, April 21, 2009 / Rules and Regulations
§ 145.14
*
Testing.
*
*
*
*
Done in Washington, DC, this 15th day of
April 2009.
Kevin Shea,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. E9–9098 Filed 4–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 835
[Docket No. HS–RM–09–835]
RIN 1901–AA95
Occupational Radiation Protection;
Correction
Department of Energy.
ACTION: Final rule; correcting
amendments.
AGENCY:
The Department of Energy
(DOE) corrects two errors in its
Occupational Radiation Protection
regulations. One error originated in a
final rulemaking (FR Doc. 98–27366),
which was published in the Federal
Register of Wednesday, November 4,
1998 (63 FR 59661). The second error
originated in a final rulemaking (FR
Doc. E7–10477), which was published
in the Federal Register of Friday, June
8, 2007 (72 FR 31903).
DATES: Effective Date: April 21, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Judith Foulke, (301) 903–5865, e-mail:
Judy.Foulke@hq.doe.gov.
SUMMARY:
mstockstill on PROD1PC66 with RULES
Background
DOE first published title 10, Code of
Federal Regulations, part 835,
Occupational Radiation Protection (part
835), as a final rule on December 14,
1993. In the November 4, 1998,
amendment to part 835, DOE, in part,
revised footnote 1 to appendix D. The
revised footnote references an exception
noted in footnote 5. The exception is
actually found in footnote 6. When DOE
proposed amending part 835 on August
10, 2006, DOE proposed correcting this
error; however, in the final rule
amending part 835 on June 8, 2007, the
correction was not made. Accordingly,
footnote 1 needs to be revised to
reference the exception in footnote 6.
When DOE proposed amending part
835 on August 10, 2006, DOE proposed
revising the definition of ‘‘absorbed
17:57 Apr 20, 2009
Jkt 217001
1 The values in this appendix, with the
exception noted in footnote 6 below, apply
to radioactive contamination deposited on,
but not incorporated into the interior or
matrix of, the contaminated item. Where
surface contamination by both alpha- and
beta-gamma-emitting nuclides exists, the
limits established for alpha- and beta-gammaemitting nuclides apply independently.
14 CFR Part 39
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 835
Federal buildings and facilities,
Nuclear energy, Nuclear materials,
Nuclear power plants and reactors,
Nuclear safety, Occupational safety and
health, Radiation protection, and
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements.
■ Accordingly, 10 CFR part 835 is
corrected by making the following
correcting amendments:
PART 835—OCCUPATIONAL
RADIATION PROTECTION
1. The authority citation for part 835
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2201, 7191; 50 U.S.C.
2410.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
dose’’ to read: ‘‘Absorbed dose (D)
means the average energy absorbed by
matter from ionizing radiation per unit
mass of irradiated material. The
absorbed dose is expressed in units of
rad (or gray) (1 rad = 0.01 gray).’’ During
the public comment period, a comment
was received that the definition should
be changed from ‘‘energy absorbed by
matter’’ to ‘‘energy imparted.’’ As noted
in the preamble to the June 8, 2007,
amendment, DOE agreed with the
comment and revised the definition to
read: ‘‘Absorbed dose (D) means the
average energy imparted by ionizing
radiation to the matter in a volume
element. The absorbed dose is expressed
in units of rad (or gray) (1 rad = 0.01
gray).’’ In making this revision, the
phrase ‘‘per unit mass of irradiated
material’’ was inadvertently deleted
from the end of the first sentence.
Need for Corrections
This correction revises the definition
of ‘‘absorbed dose’’ and changes the
reference to footnote 6 in footnote 1 of
appendix D to part 835.
2. Section 145.14 is amended by
revising the section heading to read as
follows:
■
2. In § 835.2(b), the definition of
‘‘absorbed dose’’ is corrected to read as
follows:
■
§ 835. 2
Definitions.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
Absorbed dose (D) means the average
energy imparted by ionizing radiation to
the matter in a volume element per unit
mass of irradiated material. The
absorbed dose is expressed in units of
rad (or gray) (1 rad = 0.01 gray).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 3. In appendix D, footnote 1 of the
table is corrected to read as follows:
Appendix D to Part 835—Surface
Contamination Values
*
PO 00000
*
*
Frm 00002
*
Fmt 4700
*
Sfmt 4700
*
*
*
*
*
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 13,
2009.
Glenn S. Podonsky,
Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer,
Office of Health, Safety and Security.
[FR Doc. E9–9097 Filed 4–20–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
[Docket No. FAA–2009–0126; Directorate
Identifier 2009–CE–003–AD; Amendment
39–15884; AD 2009–08–11]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; PILATUS
AIRCRAFT LTD. Models PC–12 and
PC–12/45 Airplanes
AGENCY: Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), Department of
Transportation (DOT).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: We are adopting a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for the
products listed above. This AD results
from mandatory continuing
airworthiness information (MCAI)
issued by an aviation authority of
another country to identify and correct
an unsafe condition on an aviation
product. The MCAI describes the unsafe
condition as:
This Airworthiness Directive (AD) is
prompted by some occurrences where the
Deice Pressure Regulator has vented too
much hot air into the forward compartment
damaging the oxygen cylinder ON/OFF cable,
the Ram-Air Scoop cable and the
Environmental Control System (ECS) firewall
shut-off valve cable.
If incorrectly adjusted, or defective, the
Deice Pressure Regulator can vent hot air into
the forward compartment. This situation can
cause overheating and failures of components
located inside the forward compartment,
which could result in potential loss of several
functions essential for safe flight.
We are issuing this AD to require
actions to correct the unsafe condition
on these products.
DATES: This AD becomes effective May
26, 2009.
On May 26, 2009, the Director of the
Federal Register approved the
E:\FR\FM\21APR1.SGM
21APR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 75 (Tuesday, April 21, 2009)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 18116]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9097]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY
10 CFR Part 835
[Docket No. HS-RM-09-835]
RIN 1901-AA95
Occupational Radiation Protection; Correction
AGENCY: Department of Energy.
ACTION: Final rule; correcting amendments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Energy (DOE) corrects two errors in its
Occupational Radiation Protection regulations. One error originated in
a final rulemaking (FR Doc. 98-27366), which was published in the
Federal Register of Wednesday, November 4, 1998 (63 FR 59661). The
second error originated in a final rulemaking (FR Doc. E7-10477), which
was published in the Federal Register of Friday, June 8, 2007 (72 FR
31903).
DATES: Effective Date: April 21, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Judith Foulke, (301) 903-5865, e-mail:
Judy.Foulke@hq.doe.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
DOE first published title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, part
835, Occupational Radiation Protection (part 835), as a final rule on
December 14, 1993. In the November 4, 1998, amendment to part 835, DOE,
in part, revised footnote 1 to appendix D. The revised footnote
references an exception noted in footnote 5. The exception is actually
found in footnote 6. When DOE proposed amending part 835 on August 10,
2006, DOE proposed correcting this error; however, in the final rule
amending part 835 on June 8, 2007, the correction was not made.
Accordingly, footnote 1 needs to be revised to reference the exception
in footnote 6.
When DOE proposed amending part 835 on August 10, 2006, DOE
proposed revising the definition of ``absorbed dose'' to read:
``Absorbed dose (D) means the average energy absorbed by matter from
ionizing radiation per unit mass of irradiated material. The absorbed
dose is expressed in units of rad (or gray) (1 rad = 0.01 gray).''
During the public comment period, a comment was received that the
definition should be changed from ``energy absorbed by matter'' to
``energy imparted.'' As noted in the preamble to the June 8, 2007,
amendment, DOE agreed with the comment and revised the definition to
read: ``Absorbed dose (D) means the average energy imparted by ionizing
radiation to the matter in a volume element. The absorbed dose is
expressed in units of rad (or gray) (1 rad = 0.01 gray).'' In making
this revision, the phrase ``per unit mass of irradiated material'' was
inadvertently deleted from the end of the first sentence.
Need for Corrections
This correction revises the definition of ``absorbed dose'' and
changes the reference to footnote 6 in footnote 1 of appendix D to part
835.
List of Subjects in 10 CFR Part 835
Federal buildings and facilities, Nuclear energy, Nuclear
materials, Nuclear power plants and reactors, Nuclear safety,
Occupational safety and health, Radiation protection, and Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements.
0
Accordingly, 10 CFR part 835 is corrected by making the following
correcting amendments:
PART 835--OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION PROTECTION
0
1. The authority citation for part 835 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 2201, 7191; 50 U.S.C. 2410.
0
2. In Sec. 835.2(b), the definition of ``absorbed dose'' is corrected
to read as follows:
Sec. 835. 2 Definitions.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
Absorbed dose (D) means the average energy imparted by ionizing
radiation to the matter in a volume element per unit mass of irradiated
material. The absorbed dose is expressed in units of rad (or gray) (1
rad = 0.01 gray).
* * * * *
0
3. In appendix D, footnote 1 of the table is corrected to read as
follows:
Appendix D to Part 835--Surface Contamination Values
* * * * *
\1\ The values in this appendix, with the exception noted in
footnote 6 below, apply to radioactive contamination deposited on,
but not incorporated into the interior or matrix of, the
contaminated item. Where surface contamination by both alpha- and
beta-gamma-emitting nuclides exists, the limits established for
alpha- and beta-gamma-emitting nuclides apply independently.
* * * * *
Issued in Washington, DC, on April 13, 2009.
Glenn S. Podonsky,
Chief Health, Safety and Security Officer, Office of Health, Safety and
Security.
[FR Doc. E9-9097 Filed 4-20-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P