United States Standards for Whole Dry Peas and Split Peas, 17948-17950 [E9-9017]
Download as PDF
17948
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 74 / Monday, April 20, 2009 / Notices
identified in the CER. Substantive
comments received prior to by June 15,
2009 will be of the most value in
evaluating public response to the
adequacy of the need for change topics
outlined in the report and for
developing the initial proposed draft
plan. It is important to participate in the
plan revision process as only those
parties who participate in the planning
process through the submission of
written comments may submit an
objection later in the proposed plan
development process pursuant to 36
CFR 219.13(a). Comments received
during the planning process, including
names and addresses of those who
commented will be part of the public
record available for public inspection.
The Responsible Official shall accept
and consider comments submitted
anonymously.
Estimated Schedule
The forest plan revision process for
the Kaibab National Forest officially
begins with the publication of this
notice in the Federal Register. Public
meetings will be held following release
of the initial proposed draft plan, which
is scheduled for July 2009. The dates,
times, and locations of these meetings
will be posted on the forest’s Web site:
https://www.fs.fed.us/r3/kai/planrevision/. A more refined draft of the
proposed forest plan will be available
for predecisional review in the fall of
2009, with approval of the final plan
scheduled to occur in September 2010.
Responsible Official
The Forest Supervisor of the Kaibab
National Forest, Michael R. Williams, is
the Responsible Official (36 CFR
219.2(b)(1)).
(Authority: 36 CFR 219.9(b)(2)(i), 73 FR
21509, April 21, 2008)
Dated: April 14, 2009.
Michael R. Williams,
Forest Supervisor.
[FR Doc. E9–8999 Filed 4–17–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Request for Proposals for Two Special
Focus Grants From National Urban and
Community Forestry Advisory Council
Forest Service, USDA.
Announcement of request for
proposals for two special focus grants.
rmajette on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
AGENCY:
ACTION:
SUMMARY: The National Urban and
Community Foresty Advisory Council
(NUCFAC) is charged by law to provide
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:02 Apr 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
recommendations to the Secretary of
Agriculture on urban forestry related
issues and opportunities. Part of the
Council’s role is to recommend the
criteria for the Forest Service, U.S.
Department of Agriculture’s (Forest
Service) Urban and Community Forestry
(U&CF) Challenge Cost Share Grant
Program. NUCFAC has recommended
two special focus grant proposals for the
Forest Service’s 2009 U&CF Challenge
Cost Share Grant Program. Therefore,
the Forest Service is requesting
proposals for the following two grants:
Outreach Scholarships and Storm Event
Protocol. Each grant will be solicited
separately.
DATES: Grant proposal applications are
due no later than 11:59 p.m., Eastern
Time, June 5, 2009.
ADDRESSES: Grant proposal applications
must be submitted to https://
www.grants.gov. Electronic grant
instructions and applications are posted
on https://www.grants.gov. The
instructions also are posted on the
Forest Service Web site https://
www.fs.fed.us/ucf/nucfac. An
application must be registered in
grants.gov in order to submit an
application. The registration process
may take up to two weeks.
Hard copies of the applications are
available to applicants who do not have
access to a computer. For a copy,
contact Nancy Stremple, Executive Staff
to National Urban and Community
Forestry Advisory Council, 201 14th St.,
SW., Yates Building (1 Central) MS–
1151, Washington, DC 20250–1151. To
ensure timely submittal, it is
recommended that all hardcopy
applications be delivered through a
courier service to the adress noted
above.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Stremple or Pamela Williams,
U.S. Forest Service, Urban and
Community Forestry, 201 14th St., SW.,
Yates Building (1 Central) MS–1151,
Washington, DC 20250–1151, phone
202–205–1054.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Standard Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A brief
description of each of the special focus
grant proposals follow.
Outreach Scholarships. This grant
focuses on funding up to $100,000 for
proposals that provide scholarships to
non-traditional or underserved
participants, and requires significant
documentation of implementation of
PO 00000
Frm 00010
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
knowledge gained from the urban
forestry related event.
Storm Event Protocol. This grant
focuses on funding up to $50,000 for the
development of a new storm event
protocol that blends urban forest
programs with emergency management
operations. The purpose is to reduce the
impact of storms on urban forests,
lessen personal injuries and property
damage, and decrease emergency
management costs.
Dated: April 13, 2009.
Robin L. Thompson,
Associate Deputy Chief, State and Private
Forestry.
[FR Doc. E9–8954 Filed 4–17–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–11–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration
United States Standards for Whole Dry
Peas and Split Peas
AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and
Stockyards Administration, USDA.
ACTION: Notice; request for public
comment.
SUMMARY: The Department of
Agriculture’s (USDA) Grain Inspection,
Packers and Stockyards Administration
(GIPSA) is soliciting comments on the
proposed revisions to the United States
Standards for Whole Dry Peas and Split
Peas. The proposal would amend the
general definitions, ‘‘Whole Dry Peas’’
and ‘‘Split Peas,’’ and the following
specific definitions: ‘‘Smooth Green Dry
Peas,’’ ‘‘Smooth Yellow Dry Peas,’’
‘‘Wrinkled Dry Peas,’’ ‘‘Green Split
Peas’’ and ‘‘Yellow Split Peas.’’ In
addition, GIPSA proposes to modify the
classification term and associated
definitions, ‘‘Winter Dry Peas’’ and
‘‘Winter Split Peas.’’ These proposed
changes will help facilitate the
marketing of new winter pea variety
releases and help ensure the purity of
class for ‘‘Whole Dry Peas’’ and ‘‘Split
Peas.’’
DATES: GIPSA will consider comments
received by May 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your
written or electronic comments on this
notice to:
• Mail: Tess Butler, GIPSA, USDA,
1400 Independence Avenue, SW., Room
1643–S, Washington, DC 20250–3604.
• E-Mail comments to
comments.gipsa@usda.gov.
• Fax: (202) 690–2173
• Internet: Go to https://
www.regulations.gov and follow the On-
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 74 / Monday, April 20, 2009 / Notices
Line instruction for submitting
comments.
All comments will become a matter of
public record and should be identified
as ‘‘Whole Dry and Split Pea Notice
Comments,’’ making reference to the
date and page number of this issue of
the Federal Register. Comments will be
available for public inspection in the
above office during regular business
hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)). Please call the
GIPSA Management Support Staff at
(202) 720–7486 to make an appointment
to read comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Beverly A. Whalen at USDA, GIPSA,
FGIS, Market and Program Analysis
Staff, Beacon Facility, STOP 1404, P.O.
Box 419205, Kansas City, Missouri,
64141; Telephone (816) 823–4648; Fax
Number (816) 823–4644; e-mail
Beverly.A.Whalen@usda.gov.
rmajette on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 203(c) of the Agricultural
Marketing Act of 1946, as amended,
(AMA) (7 U.S.C. 1622(c)), directs and
authorizes the Secretary of Agriculture
‘‘To develop and improve standards of
quality, condition, quantity, grade, and
packaging, and recommend and
demonstrate such standards in order to
encourage uniformity and consistency
in commercial practices.’’ GIPSA is
committed to carrying out this authority
in a manner that facilitates the
marketing of agricultural commodities.
GIPSA establishes and maintains a
variety of quality and grade standards
for agricultural commodities that serve
as the fundamental starting point to
define commodity quality in the
domestic and global marketplace.
GIPSA provides official procedures for
how inspectors determine the various
grading factors in supporting
handbooks, such as the Pea and Lentil
Handbook, which is available on the
GIPSA Web site at https://
www.gipsa.usda.gov/GIPSA/
webapp?area=home&subject=
lr&topic=hb-pl.
The AMA standards and supporting
procedures are voluntary and used
widely in private contracts, government
procurement and marketing
communication. Standards developed
under the AMA include those for rice,
whole dry peas, split peas, feed peas,
lentils and beans. The U.S. standards for
whole dry peas, split peas, feed peas,
lentils and beans no longer appear in
the Code of Federal Regulations, but are
now maintained by USDA—GIPSA. The
process for developing or reviewing
these standards is specified in the AMA
regulations (7 CFR 868.102, Procedures
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:02 Apr 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
for establishing and revising grade
standards). The U.S. Standards for
Whole Dry Peas and Split Peas are
available from the GIPSA Website at
https://www.gipsa.usda.gov, or by phone,
fax or e-mail from the contact listed
above.
GIPSA representatives maintain an
ongoing working relationship with the
USA Dry Pea and Lentil Council
(USADPLC), a national organization of
producers, processors, and exporters of
U.S. dry peas, lentils, and chickpeas; the
US Dry Pea and Lentil Trade
Association (USPLTA), a national
association representing processors,
traders, and transporters in the pea and
lentil industry, as well as handlers and
merchandisers to ensure the
effectiveness of the U.S. Standards for
whole dry peas, split peas, and lentils
in today’s marketing environment.
According to information received by
GIPSA from the USADPLC and
USPLTA, the release of and the market’s
acceptance of new winter pea varieties
necessitate several changes in the
grading standards for winter dry peas
and split peas. As a result, GIPSA is
proposing changes to the whole dry and
split pea standards to enable new and
future winter pea variety releases to be
classified and marketed on the basis of
cotyledon color and desired usage, not
on the basis of growth habit. GIPSA also
proposes to modify classification terms
and broaden associated working
definitions to permit physically and
visually similar peas to be included in
a common class to help ensure purity.
Whole Dry Pea Definition and
Classification Changes
In discussions with pea breeders,
producers, processors, and
merchandisers, GIPSA is proposing
changing the way in which different
types and varieties of domestically
grown peas are classified and defined.
Doing so will improve the effectiveness
of the standards so they may better
facilitate product marketing. The advent
of new winter dry pea varieties, which
have improved seed size consistency
and lack the distinctive mottling or
patterning normally associated with
winter dry peas, will be able to compete
with smooth yellow and green peas for
a share of the food market instead of
being limited to feed and forage uses, as
has been the case in the past.
The current whole dry pea
classification standards serve as an
obstacle to marketing new and future
winter dry pea varieties as smooth
yellow or green peas. The wording used
to define ‘‘Winter Dry Peas’’ prohibits
new variety releases from being
included in the class ‘‘Smooth Yellow
PO 00000
Frm 00011
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
17949
Dry Peas’’ or ‘‘Smooth Green Dry Peas.’’
Although the cotyledon color of the new
releases is yellow or green, a
distinguishing trait for smooth dry peas,
it is not an attribute considered in the
classification of winter dry peas. In the
current classification, the most
important factor considered is the
planting date, since all ‘‘winter field
type’’ peas are now classified as ‘‘Winter
Dry Peas.’’ While the cotyledon color of
the new and future varietal releases may
meet the general inspection criteria for
smooth yellow or green peas, the fact
that they are planted in the fall requires
that they receive a winter dry pea
classification.
In the official inspection system,
GIPSA has found that the practical
application of this definition is difficult
particularly with regard to fall and
spring planted peas. In the past, the
distinguishing feature that most
inspectors relied on was the presence or
absence of a mottled or patterned seed
coat, a trait commonly associated with
traditional winter dry peas. However,
new releases have only faint mottling to
the extent that some refer to it as
‘‘ghost’’ mottling because it is difficult
to see. Furthermore, the faint mottling is
not uniform within a variety, as some
peas are free from any detectible
mottling. In addition, identification of
new releases as winter dry peas will
likely become more improbable in the
not too distant future as breeders have
indicated that future releases will be
void of any seed coat mottling or
patterning.
Also of concern has been the release
and marketing of a number of springplanted ‘‘miscellaneous pea’’ varieties
(i.e., maple peas) that mimic the visual
appearance of the conventionally
mottled winter dry peas. Because maple
peas and traditional winter dry peas
have similar shape and seed coat color,
they are difficult to distinguish.
In an effort to preserve class purity
and permit new and future winter dry
pea releases to be certified as being
smooth yellow or green dry peas, GIPSA
has reviewed the current marketing
standards, identified the restrictive
language, and rephrased the definitions
to be more inclusive. Due to the
broadening of the class definitions, the
classification term, ‘‘Mottled Peas,’’ has
been established for winter dry peas to
better reflect the type of peas that the
class represents.
Split Pea Definition and Classification
Changes
If adopted, the proposed definition
and classification changes for whole
winter dry peas from ‘‘Winter Dry Peas’’
to ‘‘Mottled Peas’’ would affect the
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
17950
Federal Register / Vol. 74, No. 74 / Monday, April 20, 2009 / Notices
rmajette on PRODPC74 with NOTICES
meaning of the split pea class, ‘‘Winter
Split Peas.’’ The introduction of an
amended whole dry pea class, ‘‘Mottled
Peas,’’ which includes both spring and
fall planted peas, requires that the
current winter split pea definition be
expanded to be more inclusive, and the
descriptive classification term be
changed to be more representative of the
whole peas used in the production of
this type of split pea. GIPSA believes
that the classification term,
‘‘Miscellaneous Split Peas,’’ would be
appropriate. Proposed changes in the
general definition of split peas, as well
as the specific classification definitions,
are also being made to bring them more
in line with those being proposed for
whole dry peas.
Proposed GIPSA Action
GIPSA is proposing to revise select
descriptive classification terms and
definitions to allow new and future
winter dry pea releases to be marketed
as smooth yellow or green dry peas, and
preserve purity of class by grouping
colored or distinctively mottled peas
(i.e., traditional winter dry and maple
peas), regardless of planting date. GIPSA
is proposing to revise the definitions for
the following classes as follows:
1. ‘‘Whole Dry Peas.’’ Threshed seeds
of the garden type pea plant (Pisum
sativum L. and Pisum sativum var.
arvense (L.) Poir.) which after the
removal of dockage, contain 50 percent
or more of whole peas and not more
than 10.0 percent of foreign material.
2. ‘‘Smooth Yellow Dry Peas.’’ Dry
peas which have smooth seed coats and
yellow cotyledons and contain not more
than 1.5 percent of other classes.
3. ‘‘Smooth Green Dry Peas.’’ Dry peas
which have smooth seed coats and
green cotyledons and contain not more
than 1.5 percent of other classes.
4. ‘‘Wrinkled Dry Peas.’’ Dry peas
which have wrinkled seed coats and
contain not more than 1.5 percent of
other classes.
5. ‘‘Split Peas.’’ Threshed seeds of the
garden type pea plant (Pisum sativum L.
and Pisum sativum var. arvense (L.)
Poir.) which have 50 percent or more of
the peas split into halves or smaller
pieces and contain not more than 10.0
percent of foreign material.
6. ‘‘Green Split Peas.’’ Split peas from
smooth green dry pea varieties.
7. ‘‘Yellow Split Peas.’’ Split peas
from smooth yellow dry pea varieties.
In addition, GIPSA proposes to
replace the classification term and
definition of ‘‘Winter Dry Peas’’ and
‘‘Winter Split Peas’’ with ‘‘Mottled Dry
Peas’’ and ‘‘Miscellaneous Split Peas,’’
respectively. The proposed changes read
as follows:
VerDate Nov<24>2008
15:02 Apr 17, 2009
Jkt 217001
1. ‘‘Mottled Dry Peas.’’ Dry peas of the
Austrian winter pea type and other peas
which have colored or distinctively
mottled seed coats which contain not
more than 1.5 percent of other classes.
2. ‘‘Miscellaneous Split Peas.’’ Split
peas from classes of whole peas other
than smooth green or smooth yellow dry
pea varieties.
Taking into account the nature of the
proposed changes, GIPSA will solicit
comments for 30 days in order to help
facilitate the marketing of whole dry
peas and split peas.
All comments received will be
considered by GIPSA before final action
is taken on the proposal.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621–1627.
Alan R. Christian,
Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection,
Packers and Stockyards Administration.
[FR Doc. E9–9017 Filed 4–17–09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–KD–P
DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE
International Trade Administration
[A–583–008]
Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel
Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan: Final
Rescission of Antidumping Duty
Administrative Review
AGENCY: Import Administration,
International Trade Administration,
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: In response to a request from
Allied Tube & Conduit Corporation, a
domestic interested party, the
Department of Commerce (the
Department) initiated an administrative
review of the antidumping duty order
on certain circular welded carbon steel
pipes and tubes from Taiwan. This
review covers one firm, Yieh Hsing
Enterprise Co., Ltd. (Yieh Hsing), for the
period May 1, 2007, through April 30,
2008. No interested party commented
on the Department’s intent to rescind
this review based upon its
determination that the party subject to
this review did not have entries of
subject merchandise during the period
of review (POR) on which to assess
antidumping duties.
EFFECTIVE DATE: April 20, 2009.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Steve Bezirganian or Robert James, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 7, Import
Administration, International Trade
Administration, U.S. Department of
Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution
Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230;
telephone: (202) 482–1131 or (202) 482–
0649, respectively.
PO 00000
Frm 00012
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On January 21, 2009, the Department
published a notice of its intent to
rescind this administrative review. See
Certain Circular Welded Carbon Steel
Pipes and Tubes from Taiwan: Notice of
Intent to Rescind Administrative
Review, 74 FR 3559 (January 21, 2009)
(Intent to Rescind). We invited
interested parties to comment on our
preliminary intent to rescind this review
based upon our determination that the
party subject to this review did not have
entries during the POR on which to
assess antidumping duties. No
interested party submitted comments.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order
is certain circular welded carbon steel
pipes and tubes from Taiwan, which are
defined as: welded carbon steel pipes
and tubes, of circular cross section, with
walls not thinner than 0.065 inch, and
0.375 inch or more but not over 4.5
inches in outside diameter, currently
classified under Harmonized Tariff
Schedule of the United States (HTSUS)
item numbers 7306.30.5025,
7306.30.5032, 7306.30.5040, and
7306.30.5055. Although the HTSUS
subheadings are provided for
convenience and customs purposes, the
written description of the scope of the
order is dispositive.
Rescission of Administrative Review
The Department issued the Intent to
Rescind because it was satisfied that
there were no U.S. entries of subject
merchandise from the respondent, Yieh
Hsing, during the POR as indicated by
the record. See Intent to Rescind, 74 FR
at 3560. As the Department received no
comments on its intent to rescind this
review, it continues to find that
rescission of the review is appropriate.
Therefore, pursuant to 19 CFR
351.213(d), the Department is
rescinding this review.
Assessment
The Department intends to issue
assessment instructions to U.S. Customs
and Border Protection (CBP) 15 days
after the date of publication of this
rescission of administrative review.
Because Yieh Hsing certified that it
made no POR shipments of subject
merchandise for which it had
knowledge of U.S. destination, we will
instruct CBP to liquidate any entries of
merchandise produced by Yieh Hsing at
the all–others rate established in the
less–than-fair–value investigation if
there is no rate for the exporter involved
in the transaction. See Antidumping
E:\FR\FM\20APN1.SGM
20APN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 74, Number 74 (Monday, April 20, 2009)]
[Notices]
[Pages 17948-17950]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E9-9017]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration
United States Standards for Whole Dry Peas and Split Peas
AGENCY: Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards Administration, USDA.
ACTION: Notice; request for public comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Grain Inspection,
Packers and Stockyards Administration (GIPSA) is soliciting comments on
the proposed revisions to the United States Standards for Whole Dry
Peas and Split Peas. The proposal would amend the general definitions,
``Whole Dry Peas'' and ``Split Peas,'' and the following specific
definitions: ``Smooth Green Dry Peas,'' ``Smooth Yellow Dry Peas,''
``Wrinkled Dry Peas,'' ``Green Split Peas'' and ``Yellow Split Peas.''
In addition, GIPSA proposes to modify the classification term and
associated definitions, ``Winter Dry Peas'' and ``Winter Split Peas.''
These proposed changes will help facilitate the marketing of new winter
pea variety releases and help ensure the purity of class for ``Whole
Dry Peas'' and ``Split Peas.''
DATES: GIPSA will consider comments received by May 20, 2009.
ADDRESSES: You may submit your written or electronic comments on this
notice to:
Mail: Tess Butler, GIPSA, USDA, 1400 Independence Avenue,
SW., Room 1643-S, Washington, DC 20250-3604.
E-Mail comments to comments.gipsa@usda.gov.
Fax: (202) 690-2173
Internet: Go to https://www.regulations.gov and follow the
On-
[[Page 17949]]
Line instruction for submitting comments.
All comments will become a matter of public record and should be
identified as ``Whole Dry and Split Pea Notice Comments,'' making
reference to the date and page number of this issue of the Federal
Register. Comments will be available for public inspection in the above
office during regular business hours (7 CFR 1.27(b)). Please call the
GIPSA Management Support Staff at (202) 720-7486 to make an appointment
to read comments.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Beverly A. Whalen at USDA, GIPSA,
FGIS, Market and Program Analysis Staff, Beacon Facility, STOP 1404,
P.O. Box 419205, Kansas City, Missouri, 64141; Telephone (816) 823-
4648; Fax Number (816) 823-4644; e-mail Beverly.A.Whalen@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Section 203(c) of the Agricultural Marketing Act of 1946, as
amended, (AMA) (7 U.S.C. 1622(c)), directs and authorizes the Secretary
of Agriculture ``To develop and improve standards of quality,
condition, quantity, grade, and packaging, and recommend and
demonstrate such standards in order to encourage uniformity and
consistency in commercial practices.'' GIPSA is committed to carrying
out this authority in a manner that facilitates the marketing of
agricultural commodities.
GIPSA establishes and maintains a variety of quality and grade
standards for agricultural commodities that serve as the fundamental
starting point to define commodity quality in the domestic and global
marketplace. GIPSA provides official procedures for how inspectors
determine the various grading factors in supporting handbooks, such as
the Pea and Lentil Handbook, which is available on the GIPSA Web site
at https://www.gipsa.usda.gov/GIPSA/webapp?area=home&subject=lr&topic=hb-pl.
The AMA standards and supporting procedures are voluntary and used
widely in private contracts, government procurement and marketing
communication. Standards developed under the AMA include those for
rice, whole dry peas, split peas, feed peas, lentils and beans. The
U.S. standards for whole dry peas, split peas, feed peas, lentils and
beans no longer appear in the Code of Federal Regulations, but are now
maintained by USDA--GIPSA. The process for developing or reviewing
these standards is specified in the AMA regulations (7 CFR 868.102,
Procedures for establishing and revising grade standards). The U.S.
Standards for Whole Dry Peas and Split Peas are available from the
GIPSA Website at https://www.gipsa.usda.gov, or by phone, fax or e-mail
from the contact listed above.
GIPSA representatives maintain an ongoing working relationship with
the USA Dry Pea and Lentil Council (USADPLC), a national organization
of producers, processors, and exporters of U.S. dry peas, lentils, and
chickpeas; the US Dry Pea and Lentil Trade Association (USPLTA), a
national association representing processors, traders, and transporters
in the pea and lentil industry, as well as handlers and merchandisers
to ensure the effectiveness of the U.S. Standards for whole dry peas,
split peas, and lentils in today's marketing environment. According to
information received by GIPSA from the USADPLC and USPLTA, the release
of and the market's acceptance of new winter pea varieties necessitate
several changes in the grading standards for winter dry peas and split
peas. As a result, GIPSA is proposing changes to the whole dry and
split pea standards to enable new and future winter pea variety
releases to be classified and marketed on the basis of cotyledon color
and desired usage, not on the basis of growth habit. GIPSA also
proposes to modify classification terms and broaden associated working
definitions to permit physically and visually similar peas to be
included in a common class to help ensure purity.
Whole Dry Pea Definition and Classification Changes
In discussions with pea breeders, producers, processors, and
merchandisers, GIPSA is proposing changing the way in which different
types and varieties of domestically grown peas are classified and
defined. Doing so will improve the effectiveness of the standards so
they may better facilitate product marketing. The advent of new winter
dry pea varieties, which have improved seed size consistency and lack
the distinctive mottling or patterning normally associated with winter
dry peas, will be able to compete with smooth yellow and green peas for
a share of the food market instead of being limited to feed and forage
uses, as has been the case in the past.
The current whole dry pea classification standards serve as an
obstacle to marketing new and future winter dry pea varieties as smooth
yellow or green peas. The wording used to define ``Winter Dry Peas''
prohibits new variety releases from being included in the class
``Smooth Yellow Dry Peas'' or ``Smooth Green Dry Peas.'' Although the
cotyledon color of the new releases is yellow or green, a
distinguishing trait for smooth dry peas, it is not an attribute
considered in the classification of winter dry peas. In the current
classification, the most important factor considered is the planting
date, since all ``winter field type'' peas are now classified as
``Winter Dry Peas.'' While the cotyledon color of the new and future
varietal releases may meet the general inspection criteria for smooth
yellow or green peas, the fact that they are planted in the fall
requires that they receive a winter dry pea classification.
In the official inspection system, GIPSA has found that the
practical application of this definition is difficult particularly with
regard to fall and spring planted peas. In the past, the distinguishing
feature that most inspectors relied on was the presence or absence of a
mottled or patterned seed coat, a trait commonly associated with
traditional winter dry peas. However, new releases have only faint
mottling to the extent that some refer to it as ``ghost'' mottling
because it is difficult to see. Furthermore, the faint mottling is not
uniform within a variety, as some peas are free from any detectible
mottling. In addition, identification of new releases as winter dry
peas will likely become more improbable in the not too distant future
as breeders have indicated that future releases will be void of any
seed coat mottling or patterning.
Also of concern has been the release and marketing of a number of
spring-planted ``miscellaneous pea'' varieties (i.e., maple peas) that
mimic the visual appearance of the conventionally mottled winter dry
peas. Because maple peas and traditional winter dry peas have similar
shape and seed coat color, they are difficult to distinguish.
In an effort to preserve class purity and permit new and future
winter dry pea releases to be certified as being smooth yellow or green
dry peas, GIPSA has reviewed the current marketing standards,
identified the restrictive language, and rephrased the definitions to
be more inclusive. Due to the broadening of the class definitions, the
classification term, ``Mottled Peas,'' has been established for winter
dry peas to better reflect the type of peas that the class represents.
Split Pea Definition and Classification Changes
If adopted, the proposed definition and classification changes for
whole winter dry peas from ``Winter Dry Peas'' to ``Mottled Peas''
would affect the
[[Page 17950]]
meaning of the split pea class, ``Winter Split Peas.'' The introduction
of an amended whole dry pea class, ``Mottled Peas,'' which includes
both spring and fall planted peas, requires that the current winter
split pea definition be expanded to be more inclusive, and the
descriptive classification term be changed to be more representative of
the whole peas used in the production of this type of split pea. GIPSA
believes that the classification term, ``Miscellaneous Split Peas,''
would be appropriate. Proposed changes in the general definition of
split peas, as well as the specific classification definitions, are
also being made to bring them more in line with those being proposed
for whole dry peas.
Proposed GIPSA Action
GIPSA is proposing to revise select descriptive classification
terms and definitions to allow new and future winter dry pea releases
to be marketed as smooth yellow or green dry peas, and preserve purity
of class by grouping colored or distinctively mottled peas (i.e.,
traditional winter dry and maple peas), regardless of planting date.
GIPSA is proposing to revise the definitions for the following classes
as follows:
1. ``Whole Dry Peas.'' Threshed seeds of the garden type pea plant
(Pisum sativum L. and Pisum sativum var. arvense (L.) Poir.) which
after the removal of dockage, contain 50 percent or more of whole peas
and not more than 10.0 percent of foreign material.
2. ``Smooth Yellow Dry Peas.'' Dry peas which have smooth seed
coats and yellow cotyledons and contain not more than 1.5 percent of
other classes.
3. ``Smooth Green Dry Peas.'' Dry peas which have smooth seed coats
and green cotyledons and contain not more than 1.5 percent of other
classes.
4. ``Wrinkled Dry Peas.'' Dry peas which have wrinkled seed coats
and contain not more than 1.5 percent of other classes.
5. ``Split Peas.'' Threshed seeds of the garden type pea plant
(Pisum sativum L. and Pisum sativum var. arvense (L.) Poir.) which have
50 percent or more of the peas split into halves or smaller pieces and
contain not more than 10.0 percent of foreign material.
6. ``Green Split Peas.'' Split peas from smooth green dry pea
varieties.
7. ``Yellow Split Peas.'' Split peas from smooth yellow dry pea
varieties.
In addition, GIPSA proposes to replace the classification term and
definition of ``Winter Dry Peas'' and ``Winter Split Peas'' with
``Mottled Dry Peas'' and ``Miscellaneous Split Peas,'' respectively.
The proposed changes read as follows:
1. ``Mottled Dry Peas.'' Dry peas of the Austrian winter pea type
and other peas which have colored or distinctively mottled seed coats
which contain not more than 1.5 percent of other classes.
2. ``Miscellaneous Split Peas.'' Split peas from classes of whole
peas other than smooth green or smooth yellow dry pea varieties.
Taking into account the nature of the proposed changes, GIPSA will
solicit comments for 30 days in order to help facilitate the marketing
of whole dry peas and split peas.
All comments received will be considered by GIPSA before final
action is taken on the proposal.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1621-1627.
Alan R. Christian,
Acting Administrator, Grain Inspection, Packers and Stockyards
Administration.
[FR Doc. E9-9017 Filed 4-17-09; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-KD-P